| Title: | C++ |
| Notice: | Read 1.* and use keywords (e.g. SHOW KEY/FULL KIT_CXX_VAX_VMS) |
| Moderator: | DECCXX::AMARTIN |
| Created: | Fri Nov 06 1987 |
| Last Modified: | Thu Jun 05 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 3604 |
| Total number of notes: | 18242 |
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2498.1 | customer code and commentary | ALFAXP::FORD | Atlanta CSC; UNIX Applications | Tue Mar 28 1995 19:06 | 173 |
| 2498.2 | CSC32::D_DERAMO | Dan D'Eramo, Customer Support Center | Tue Mar 28 1995 19:50 | 8 | |
| 2498.3 | The operator= is a red herring... | OOTOOL::HIGGS | SQL is a camel in disguise | Wed Mar 29 1995 10:14 | 123 |
| 2498.4 | MOIRA::FAIMAN | Alternately stone in you and star | Wed Mar 29 1995 13:35 | 11 | |
| 2498.5 | The lack of a copy constructor is NOT a bug | OOTOOL::HIGGS | SQL is a camel in disguise | Wed Mar 29 1995 14:48 | 24 |
| 2498.6 | MOIRA::FAIMAN | Alternately stone in you and star | Wed Mar 29 1995 18:06 | 73 | |
| 2498.7 | Sounds like we're basically agreeing... | OOTOOL::HIGGS | SQL is a camel in disguise | Thu Mar 30 1995 10:35 | 27 |
| 2498.8 | CSC32::D_DERAMO | Dan D'Eramo, Customer Support Center | Thu Mar 30 1995 12:40 | 5 | |
| 2498.12 | problem with initializing arrays of objects | RHETT::LOH | Mon Apr 17 1995 11:34 | 104 | |
| 2498.13 | CSC32::D_DERAMO | Dan D'Eramo, Customer Support Center | Mon Apr 17 1995 13:02 | 13 | |
| 2498.14 | MOIRA::FAIMAN | Alternately stone in you and star | Mon Apr 17 1995 13:21 | 1 | |
| 2498.9 | Noted | DECCXX::AMARTIN | Alan H. Martin | Mon May 01 1995 10:07 | 11 |
| 2498.10 | It depends... | OOTOOL::HIGGS | SQL is a camel in disguise | Mon May 01 1995 13:52 | 66 |
| 2498.11 | I don't practice what I preach ... | DECCXX::AMARTIN | Alan H. Martin | Mon May 01 1995 15:19 | 8 |
| 2498.15 | Why can "typically the call to the copy constructor" be eliminated? | RDGENG::BERENT | Anthony Berent | Tue May 02 1995 07:25 | 50 |
| 2498.16 | MOIRA::FAIMAN | Alternately stone in you and star | Tue May 02 1995 11:55 | 15 | |
| 2498.17 | Copy constructors definitely have special requirements | DECCXX::AMARTIN | Alan H. Martin | Tue May 02 1995 12:00 | 8 |
| 2498.18 | Comments, and more questions, on .16 and .17 | RDGENG::BERENT | Anthony Berent | Tue May 02 1995 15:14 | 80 |
| 2498.19 | MOIRA::FAIMAN | Alternately stone in you and star | Tue May 02 1995 15:43 | 8 | |
| 2498.20 | Copy constructors must merely copy, at least in some places | DECCXX::AMARTIN | Alan H. Martin | Tue May 02 1995 15:54 | 22 |
| 2498.21 | generation function is funny | TKTV30::HASEGAWA | Wed Jul 10 1996 23:54 | 118 | |
| 2498.22 | try newer compiler | DECC::SEIGEL | Thu Jul 11 1996 09:34 | 22 | |
| 2498.23 | Classes which call new and delete always need copy constructors | DECCXX::AMARTIN | Alan H. Martin | Thu Jul 11 1996 15:37 | 5 |
| 2498.24 | Thanks | TKTV30::HASEGAWA | Fri Jul 12 1996 09:50 | 5 |