T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1876.1 | "Ashtar Commmand" | SALEM::BOUTHILLIER | | Tue Sep 07 1993 09:58 | 2 |
| Try conference WIDGET::UFOS note 187.
|
1876.2 | Thank you! | ABACUS::RODENHISER | Shall We?? | Tue Sep 07 1993 12:13 | 3 |
| Thanks!!
Dick
|
1876.7 | Thank you, Marco | POWDML::RAMSAY | | Fri Jul 15 1994 11:47 | 1 |
| Marcos, thank you so much for entering that info.
|
1876.10 | | POWDML::RAMSAY | | Thu Jul 21 1994 15:28 | 3 |
| Marcos, thank you very much for entering that information.
*Susan*/*Stella*
|
1876.11 | | PERLE::glantz | Mike, soon-to-close Paris Research Lab, 776-2836 | Fri Jul 22 1994 04:45 | 5 |
| Marcos, I note that these news flashes are posted somewhat out of
order. Is this just the order you happen to receive them in, or is
there another reason for posting in this order?
Just curious. Thanks for posting. I enjoy reading them.
|
1876.13 | other Ashtar blurbs | POWDML::RAMSAY | | Fri Jul 22 1994 15:03 | 4 |
| I think Ashtar Command is mentioned elsewhere in Dejavu also --
Talligai's notes -- but I'm not adept enough to know how to
search for it!
|
1876.16 | | POWDML::RAMSAY | | Wed Jul 27 1994 15:42 | 2 |
| Thanks, Marcos, for that food for thought.
|
1876.19 | | HOO78C::ANDERSON | Hooray for our team! | Mon Aug 01 1994 11:49 | 11 |
| Re .17
>GREENWICH TIME will cease to exist in reality.
Er um, cough. GMT ceased to exist in reality many years ago. It was
replaced by UST which comes from an atomic clock somewhere in Germany.
My watch has a radio link to this clock and it appears to be totally
unaffected by the time shifts.
Jamie.
|
1876.20 | | MKOTS3::JOLLIMORE | jes mite be ur kinda zoo! | Mon Aug 01 1994 11:59 | 10 |
| Well, Jamie, it looks like confrontation time for you.
It would seem to me that you are in denial.
Prepare to deflate your ego.
Oh yeah, and Ashtar Command Central has intercepted your radio
link to UST. That's why it is unaffected by the time shifts.
;-)
Jay
|
1876.21 | Inconsistency | SWAM1::MILLS_MA | To Thine own self be True | Mon Aug 01 1994 12:09 | 9 |
| I find it interesting that Ashtar is very articulate in some notes and
can't even spell in others (Jupiture?!?) What are these worlds coming
to?
;^),
Marilyn
|
1876.23 | atomic clock link | TNPUBS::PAINTER | Planet Crayon | Tue Aug 02 1994 11:51 | 7 |
|
Re.19
How does the watch work, Jamie? Would it work if you were located
as far away as the US? Is it expensive?
Cindy
|
1876.24 | | HOO78C::ANDERSON | Hooray for our team! | Wed Aug 03 1994 02:47 | 38 |
| OK it works like this. Somewhere in Germany they have this super
accurate atomic clock. Attached to it is a very very low frequency
radio transmitter (I think it is as low as 16 Khz). Every minute it
transmits the date and time.
Under normal circumstances my watch will activate its receiver just
before 02:00 and listen for the signal and reset itself to the atomic
clock. Should it fail the first time it will try a further twice at
02:01 and 02:02. If this fails it powers down the receiver and tries
again between 03:00 and 03:02.
However I can force it to clear itself and listen until it receives the
time at which point the hands will move to the correct time and the
digital display will show the date, day of the week and seconds.
We also have a digital clock that works in the same manner.
When I go to the UK, one time zone back, I press a button and the watch
subtracts an hour from the time signal. Should I go East I can push a
second button and it will add an hour. It can accept a �2 hour
variation from the time signal.
I think, but am not sure, that a similar transmitter covers the USA but
it works on a different frequency so my watch could not receive the
signals and would just work as a normal watch there and correct itself
when I got home.
One of the disadvantages is, it doesn't work too well in Newfoundland.
It is amusing to watch the minute hand move exactly in time with the
last pip of the time signal on the radio and I never have to remember
to put it on an hour or back as we move from winter time to summer
time.
It was a present but I believe it cost around $400.
Jamie.
|
1876.25 | | MKOTS3::JOLLIMORE | jes mite be ur kinda zoo! | Wed Aug 03 1994 09:22 | 5 |
| Oooh, I want one of those watches. :-)
I have to set mine, manually, to Peter Jennings.
(Network TV news ;-)
Jay
|
1876.29 | | BIGQ::GARDNER | justme....jacqui | Wed Aug 03 1994 10:58 | 6 |
|
Is this the Don Allen of bee pollen fame?
inquiring minds etc.....
|
1876.30 | wonder watch | TNPUBS::PAINTER | Planet Crayon | Wed Aug 03 1994 12:07 | 7 |
|
Thanks Jamie. I'm with Jay - sounds like a neat toy! (;^)
(Sorry for the diversion, Marcos...now back to our regularly scheduled
topic.)
Cindy
|
1876.31 | | HOO78C::ANDERSON | Hooray for our team! | Thu Aug 04 1994 03:24 | 6 |
| >Is this the Don Allen of bee pollen fame?
I doubt it. Anything Don Allen wrote looked like a call for the
unconditional surrender of the English language.
Jamie.
|
1876.32 | | SUPER::WTHOMAS | | Thu Aug 04 1994 09:53 | 3 |
|
;-)
|
1876.33 | What? | COMET::SCHWARZMAN | | Fri Aug 12 1994 11:36 | 2 |
| Am I stupid or is this stuff off the wall and not making a whole lot
of sense? Somebody needs to explain? And yes I am open to teaching.
|
1876.34 | | HOO78C::ANDERSON | The plums have started! | Mon Aug 15 1994 03:29 | 8 |
| Re .33
>Am I stupid or is this stuff off the wall and not making a whole lot
>of sense? Somebody needs to explain? And yes I am open to teaching.
Are you daring to suggest that the King is actually naked?
Jamie.
|
1876.35 | ??? | TNPUBS::PAINTER | Planet Crayon | Mon Aug 15 1994 12:17 | 6 |
|
Re.33
Can you be a little more specific?
Cindy
|
1876.36 | | HOO78C::ANDERSON | The plums have started! | Tue Aug 16 1994 02:24 | 7 |
| >Can you be a little more specific?
He thinks that it is complete and utter rubbish from beginning to end?
If this is so, I suspect that he is far from being alone.
Jamie.
|
1876.37 | Huhhh? | COMET::SCHWARZMAN | | Tue Aug 16 1994 11:20 | 2 |
| Make no conclusions! I am trying to understand... there is no
explanation as to what you are discussing...
|
1876.38 | | HOO78C::ANDERSON | The plums have started! | Tue Aug 16 1994 11:34 | 8 |
| Ah! I'm afraid that if you require an explanation, you are incapable of
understanding the issue at hand. I think that you are making an
attempt to make some sense out of it. I doubt if you will succeed.
Fortunately the designers of Easynotes foresaw this problem and I think
that if you press the comma key on your numeric keyboard the problem
will instantly be solved.
Jamie.
|
1876.39 | LAME EXCUSE | COMET::SCHWARZMAN | | Tue Aug 16 1994 12:00 | 5 |
| Sound's like a cop out to me. Come on explain to me what it is that
you are talking about. Your first response is to condemn me for
something that I dont understand. In that case I think that any
body who reads this note has to be a sceptic!
LATER ON AND LIKE MUCH.....
|
1876.40 | once again | TNPUBS::PAINTER | Planet Crayon | Tue Aug 16 1994 12:11 | 18 |
|
Re.33 (Schwarzman)
Jamie's comments aside this time...I'll ask again.
*** Can you be more specific as to what you are not understanding? ***
I'm happy to try to explain whatever it is you have a question on, but
I need to know a bit more first. Do you not understand the:
- entire notestring?
- an individual note in this string?
- a paragraph or so in an individual note?
- a particular statement that was made?
Please elaborate.
Cindy
|
1876.41 | | WMOIS::CONNELL | I will do thee mischief in the wood. | Tue Aug 16 1994 12:37 | 14 |
| I thought it was quite clear. Jamie, Cindy, and Jay are discussing
Jamie's nifty chronotoy. I want one also. Marcos is posting stuff he
receives from someone who channels it through the entity known as
Ashstar, however the majority of the discussion is still about the
watch. I have a question on the watch. Some people can't wear watches
as their internal chemistry, magnetic field, or aura or energy or
whatever one wishes to call it causes the watch to not keep proper
time. How would this affect the Atomic Watch? Would it constantly
correct itself or would it just keep spinning around? Not critical,
just being curious.
Bright Blessings
PJ
|
1876.42 | | STOWOA::JOLLIMORE | jes mite be ur kinda zoo! | Tue Aug 16 1994 12:50 | 19 |
| PJ,
The atomic watch, I'm afraid, would try to correct you instead.
^ ^
0 0
c
O
(just kiddin ;')
|
1876.43 | | WMOIS::CONNELL | I will do thee mischief in the wood. | Tue Aug 16 1994 13:06 | 5 |
| Politically or in some other way?
Bright Blessings
PJ
|
1876.46 | | HOO78C::ANDERSON | The plums have started! | Wed Aug 17 1994 04:39 | 29 |
| >I have a question on the watch. Some people can't wear watches as
>their internal chemistry, magnetic field, or aura or energy or whatever
>one wishes to call it causes the watch to not keep proper time. How
>would this affect the Atomic Watch?
The watch is not atomic, it is powered by a battery.
Essentially it is the front part of a normal watch, and hour hand and a
minute hand. This is mechanical and is driven by a pulse once a minute
from the electronic half.
There is a small LCD showing the day of the month, the month, the
seconds and the day of the week.
Do these people have trouble with digital watches?
Personally I can't get a mechanical self winding watch to keep working
for more that a week on my wrist. I got one for my 21st and despite
trying several different types I could not find one that would keep
running. No other type of watch gives me any trouble.
>Would it constantly correct itself or would it just keep spinning
>around?
It would correct itself when it thought that it was 2 am. But I doubt
if it would fail.
Jamie.
|
1876.47 | | STOWOA::JOLLIMORE | jes mite be ur kinda zoo! | Wed Aug 17 1994 08:52 | 5 |
| > Politically or in some other way?
You'll want to buy all of Rush's books!
;-)
|
1876.48 | | BIGQ::GARDNER | justme....jacqui | Wed Aug 17 1994 10:39 | 12 |
|
THE GREAT WHITE BROTHERHOOD ??????????
Is this a Southern-type organization?
justme....jacqui
|
1876.50 | Great White LIGHT | POWDML::RAMSAY | | Wed Aug 17 1994 12:36 | 7 |
| re .48 jacqui
Great White Brotherhood is explained in one of Talligai's strings.
I'm sorry I do not know how to find it for you. But the term
has to do with white light. Nothing southern.
*Stella*
|
1876.51 | | WMOIS::CONNELL | I will do thee mischief in the wood. | Wed Aug 17 1994 12:38 | 18 |
| Jay, no I won't. Check out womannotes for more on Rush Limbaugh. :-)
Bleeehhh and he's going to be on WRKO AM talk radio (Boston station for
you out of towners) for 3 hours every afternoon starting in September.
Guess I stop listening to that station.
Jamie, thanks for more info on the watch. My calling it an Atomic Watch
was a small (very small) attempt at a bit of humor. As far as folks not
being able to wear digital (not us :-) ) watches, I'm not sure either.
Marcos, I think a number of us are having some fun with this string
lately. The poster of the basenote does seem to want some serious
answers about the Ashtar information. The rest of us have degraded
(risen?) into downright silliness. Some of us need some silliness right
now.
Bright Blessings
PJ
|
1876.52 | GWB | TNPUBS::PAINTER | Planet Crayon | Wed Aug 17 1994 18:43 | 10 |
|
Welcome back again, Stella! (;^)
Jacqui, the GWB is also mentioned in the Alice Bailey material that she
channelled and wrote back in the earlier part of this century.
However, I have since forgotten what exactly it was that they are.
Nothing like a bunch of men who get together, smoke cigars, wear funny
hats and have secret handshakes and moose calls though. (;^)
Cindy
|
1876.53 | | BIGQ::GARDNER | justme....jacqui | Thu Aug 18 1994 17:50 | 11 |
|
Calling it the GWB tends to come across, to me, as being not very
diversity-sensitive. Issues such as these need clarification for
those of us not in the know so that we don't jump to sometimes rash
thoughts.
Thanks to all who clarified for us members who read here.
justme....jacqui
|
1876.54 | Don't look for offense where there is none | SWAM1::MILLS_MA | To Thine own self be True | Thu Aug 18 1994 20:05 | 9 |
| FWIW, I think the Great White Brotherhood has been talked about in
Rosicrucian literature, et al. for a long time. The White in
Brotherhood, as someone already noted, deals with the white light of
spirituality, not with any racial connotations anyone may have with
this. Since this term is quite old, I think, it predates any PC
issues people may have with it.
Marilyn
|
1876.55 | | BIGQ::GARDNER | justme....jacqui | Fri Aug 19 1994 12:22 | 17 |
| > -< Don't look for offense where there is none >-
IF people do not challenge statements that appear to have sensi-
tivity issues related to them and ask for clarification, then
in some cases there are persons who accept them in the present-
day genre. This, then, perpetuates the wrong message.
It was quite interesting to see George Wallace trying to over-
come his place in history last night on one of the news talk
shows. He is known as THE racist leader of the South. He is
now apparently getting ready to meet his maker and wants to
show the public that his past was in arrears.
justme....jacqui
|
1876.56 | | WMOIS::CONNELL | I will do thee mischief in the wood. | Fri Aug 19 1994 12:44 | 22 |
| Exactly, Jacqui. People must challenge and not blindly follow. A lot of
stuff comes through as being rather sinister. Some because it is and
some because it just sounds that way. When I first heard about GWB, I
thought of the folks in pointy-headed sheets also. Recently I've been
reading Journey of Souls. (Author's name escapes me at the moment.)
It's about people who've been hypnotised as in Past Life Regression,
but stopped in between lives to describe the Afterlife. He (the author)
claims to get a lot of striking similarity of experience in his
subjects stories. He seems to combine some of the myth of "heaven" that
a lot of us have grown up with along with some Hindu sounding beliefs,
plus school. Now I was quite put off by the talk of groups of souls not
associating with other groups. It sounded extremely snobbish in how it
was described. This may be because "No human words can describe it" or
it may be outright untruth by the author or it may be our limited human
understanding. Hey maybe Heaven is really a bunch of snobs sticking
with specific souls for eternity. (Somehow, I doubt it:-) ) Point is to
question authority and to alway authorize questioning and you are
right.
Bright Blessings
PJ
|
1876.57 | gwb, gbs... | TNPUBS::PAINTER | Planet Crayon | Fri Aug 19 1994 23:11 | 15 |
|
"Great Black Sisterhood" conjures up some interesting images too...(;^)
Just looked through a few Alice Bailey books and couldn't find a direct
reference to the GWB in the indexes or toc's, but there are entries for
the Hierarchy and Great White Lodge...it's been a while since I've seen
the GWB reference itself. Will keep watch out for it though.
Y'know...I think the answer lies within this conference...if anyone has
time, search for author=Lackey...I'm certain I asked Jeff this question
in the conference since I had the same reaction many years ago and
think Jeff was the one who mentioned it, hence my association with the
Bailey works.
Cindy
|
1876.58 | comprehensive list ... | STOWOA::JOLLIMORE | jes mite be ur kinda zoo! | Mon Aug 22 1994 09:32 | 34 |
| Using the SEARCH utility I found these references to "The Great
White Brotherhood" ...
Note Title Comment
407.2 St Germain Earliest reference; Jul, 1987
1199.5 Maitreya This string was introduced by Atkinson
.10 (then Altraea) and discusses Lord Maitreya
.15 and his connections to the GWB. Cindy asked
.19 about a tie to Roscrucians. Reply .143 is a
.143 very lengthy posting from Marcos.
1235.1 1199.24 Note was started from discussions in 1199.
.2 Reply .2 has a pointer to 1199.30
.5
1460.8 Welcome Talligai Atkinson now noting as Talligai.
.137
.148
.151
.166
1541.12 ...Samurai Writer Lengthy postings from a former noter (Lenny
.46 "something") Reply .12 is 2,671 lines and .12
is 798 lines.
1705.114 The End Of This reply is a News posting by Jamie Anderson
The World where the end of the world is called off.
1876.15 Ashtar Command This is the currrent discussion.
.45
.48
Jay
|
1876.63 | | TNPUBS::PAINTER | Planet Crayon | Wed Dec 07 1994 15:26 | 8 |
|
No plea for money at the end this time, Jamie. (;^)
I'm still puzzled why they keep referencing Krishna and Shiva for
Hinduism when the avatar for this age is Lord Kalki (per *real*
Hinduism).
Cindy
|
1876.64 | | HOO78C::ANDERSON | What's that in air miles, Clyde? | Thu Dec 08 1994 03:53 | 3 |
| If their copy writer gets paid by the word he must be rich.
Jamie.
|
1876.65 | Marcos, Talligai thanks you | POWDML::RAMSAY | | Tue Dec 13 1994 11:25 | 8 |
| Marcos
I saw Talligai last evening at the 12:12 celebration. She asked me
to thank you for keeping us all posted with your Ashtar et al.
notes and she sends you Namasthe.
Namasthe from moi aussi
*Stella*
|
1876.67 | hehheh! | TNPUBS::PAINTER | Planet Crayon | Tue Dec 13 1994 16:54 | 6 |
|
It's open season on your notes from now on, Marcos. (;^)
Cindy
PS. I'll be in Rio in February...on a preplanned tour.
|
1876.68 | | POWDML::RAMSAY | | Fri Dec 16 1994 14:37 | 12 |
| re .66 Marcos
You have posted only part of Talligai's note. What is this called ...
taking it out of context? I do not know how to get it and put it here
for everyone to read her entire posting. It seems to me that you are
using the part you choose to use for your own benefit and ignoring the
part that states she (we all) have the ability to transcend our
physical bodies at will. Talligai got "raptured up" and "vaporized
into etheric realms," as you say, at will. She returns to the physical
earth plane at will also.
I AM not speaking for Talligai. I simply read her note 1775 which you
refer to.
|
1876.69 | | HOO78C::ANDERSON | What's that in air miles, Clyde? | Mon Dec 19 1994 01:42 | 7 |
| >You have posted only part of Talligai's note. What is this called ...
>taking it out of context?
Given Marcos's talent for filling this disk, I think I can forgive him
just this once.
Jamie.
|
1876.71 | | REGENT::BROOMHEAD | Don't panic -- yet. | Wed Apr 05 1995 17:55 | 8 |
| I didn't even bother to finish reading the <noun> in the previous
entry.
"Ashtar" is an older deity than the manufactured "Ashtaroth". Ashtar
is Ishtar; "Ashtaroth" is the plural of "Ashereh", the Semitic form
of the name.
Ann B.
|
1876.72 | and if you take away the 'a'... | TNPUBS::PAINTER | Planet Crayon | Thu Apr 06 1995 12:19 | 4 |
|
"UFOnauts" - it may be an old word, but it's a new one for me. (;^)
Cindy
|