T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1810.1 | | HOO78C::ANDERSON | I know a secret! | Wed Mar 03 1993 02:56 | 5 |
| Have you thought of hiring yourself out to the electronic repair
industry? You could walk through an office and drum up business for
them!
Jamie.
|
1810.2 | Any patterns that might help ? | DWOVAX::STARK | ambience through amphigory | Wed Mar 03 1993 08:31 | 17 |
| re: .0,
I'm curious ...
What's the timing of the failures like ? Same time of day, evenly
spaced out, random ?
Anything else that is happening at the same time as all or most of them ?
Do you remember what everyone in the house was doing at the time ?
Notice any change in the lights or odd sounds just before equipment
fails ?
Any odd odors from any of the equipment after it fails ?
todd
|
1810.3 | | HOO78C::ANDERSON | I know a secret! | Wed Mar 03 1993 08:51 | 10 |
| As a field service engineer I used to notice the exact opposite. I
would get called to a site, ask what the problem was, the operator
would say, "Just watch this!" and the equipment would work flawlessly.
We call it an intermittent fault, these you can usually induce to
appear by altering something else.
The operators however were convinced that I could scare computers into
working.
Jamie.
|
1810.5 | | VERGA::STANLEY | what a long strange trip it's been | Wed Mar 03 1993 09:13 | 2 |
| You're one of those people, Ruth... I know other people like that.. who
effect electronic equipment that way... and street lights and things..
|
1810.6 | you're not alone | TNPUBS::PAINTER | angel pranks, swan songs | Wed Mar 03 1993 10:59 | 5 |
|
In her books, Shirley MacLaine often writes about these sorts of things
happening around her too.
Cindy
|
1810.7 | Ectoplasmic E-fields | WELLER::FANNIN | Chocolate is bliss | Wed Mar 03 1993 18:49 | 34 |
|
Re: .2
>>What's the timing of the failures like ? Same time of day, evenly
spaced out, random ? ----> random
>>Anything else that is happening at the same time as all or most of
them ? ----> You mean like someone turning on the blender or
something? Not that I can think of.
>>Do you remember what everyone in the house was doing at the time ?
-----> I share my home only with my 2-year old daughter and
several domesticated mammals.
>>Notice any change in the lights or odd sounds just before equipment
fails ? ----> Nope. That would be a lark, eh?!
>>Any odd odors from any of the equipment after it fails ?
----> I see you are favoring the deceased hacker from
beyond theory. No odors.
Actually, It has cost me quite a bit a money. Maybe I should get Jamie
to come over and scare it into working!
And I had no idea that Shirley MacLaine said this happens to her. I've
never read any of her books. But she and I both have red hair. Maybe
our hair picks up a certain light frequency that somehow activates our
respective pineal glands into creating personal auras that disrupt our
equipment!
Cindy--Does Shirley say how she *stops* it from happening?
Ruth
|
1810.8 | | HOO78C::ANDERSON | I know a secret! | Thu Mar 04 1993 03:04 | 10 |
| Re .7
>But she and I both have red hair. Maybe our hair picks up a certain
>light frequency that somehow activates our respective pineal glands
>into creating personal auras that disrupt our equipment!
The colour of your hair is the frequencies it reflects rather than the
frequencies it absorbs.
Jamie.
|
1810.9 | | KERNEL::BELL | Hear the softly spoken magic spell | Thu Mar 04 1993 06:43 | 6 |
|
... so bearing in mind that the absorbed frequencies are the complement of
the reflected ones and given both people reflect the same frequencies, it
follows that for a set source spectra they will absorb the same frequencies.
Frank
|
1810.10 | | HOO78C::ANDERSON | I know a secret! | Thu Mar 04 1993 06:49 | 5 |
| Yes Frank, but it is a common misconception that an object which
appears to be red absorbs red light, whilst the exact opposite is the
case. This is the point that I was trying to make.
Jamie.
|
1810.11 | Dead hackers and burned resistors | DWOVAX::STARK | ambience through amphigory | Thu Mar 04 1993 09:28 | 21 |
| Thanks, Ruth.
> >>Notice any change in the lights or odd sounds just before equipment
> fails ? ----> Nope. That would be a lark, eh?!
I thought maybe before settling on a paranormal hypothesis,
nanites, or EMP experiments from NORAD we might consider power supply
fluctuations. Blinking lights or buzzing or whirring might indicate that
other equipment in the house was being influenced by a power dip or spike.
This wouldn't affect the battery operated equipment obviously,
but such a large collection of failures might have some small percentage
of coincidences.
The odd smell I was asking about, besides a malodorous hacker spirit
was to look for a characteristic sign of power flux, resistors
being burned out. Of course, even if that happened, it doesn't
mean you couldn't have influenced it somehow, possibly.
Are there any similar reports from neighbors ?
todd
|
1810.12 | | TNPUBS::PAINTER | angel pranks, swan songs | Thu Mar 04 1993 11:23 | 7 |
| Re.7
Ruth,
No, she doesn't.
Cindy
|
1810.13 | Medusa revisited | WELLER::FANNIN | Chocolate is bliss | Thu Mar 04 1993 13:22 | 25 |
| re .9
>>... so bearing in mind that the absorbed frequencies are the complement
>>of the reflected ones and given both people reflect the same
>>frequencies, it follows that for a set source spectra they will absorb
>>the same frequencies.
!! I'm absorbing the same frequencies as Shirley MacLaine. Well folks,
you heard it here first. Maybe I should phone Shirley up and ask her
for her hair bandwidth specifications. My own hair is far from
monochromatic.
re .11
Todd, I haven't talked to any of my neighbors to see if they are
experiencing lots of equipment failures...might be a good idea. I
haven't noticed any signs of gross power fluctuations -- no digital
clocks blinking etc.
Whether or not this is a case of hackers who have uploaded (bad hackers
get downloaded) is yet to be seen. But I like the theory. I think as
more and more hackers grow old and die they will try to make contact
the best way they know how -- in our logic circuits.
...And we think computer viruses are a nuisance!
|
1810.14 | It would be less expensive to fly Jamie over. | WELLER::FANNIN | Chocolate is bliss | Sun Mar 07 1993 17:03 | 9 |
| sigh. one more appliance bites the dust.
7. The garbage disposal motor makes a funny noise and won't work.
--Ruth
|
1810.15 | | HOO78C::ANDERSON | I've got a LA50! | Mon Mar 08 1993 05:21 | 7 |
| Re .14
>The garbage disposal motor makes a funny noise and won't work.
Switch off the power and remove the obstruction.
Jamie.
|
1810.16 | duh | WELLER::FANNIN | Chocolate is bliss | Mon Mar 08 1993 11:18 | 4 |
| re: Switch off the power and remove the obstruction.
That was kinda like the first thing I tried.
|
1810.17 | | HOO78C::ANDERSON | I've got a LA50! | Tue Mar 09 1993 02:34 | 18 |
| Recently we had a spate of breakdown of the domestic appliances. Out of
these two were genuine breakdowns. The rest were things that we had, or
had not done. Failing to remove the lint from the filter of the clothes
drier caused it to switch off. A one small coin in the impeller blades
of the pump of the washing machine stopped it going into a spin cycle.
A wooden toothpick lodged itself in the pump of the dishwasher and
stopped it from pumping out. The vacuum cleaner picked up a piece of
string and wrapped it round its belt bringing it to a shuddering halt.
That is just the last year or so. The more equipment you have the more
there is to go wrong.
One of our customers is turning in terminals with broken keyboards at a
fantastic rate, about 10 per day. You might think that there is some
psychic person wandering round zapping them merely by standing next to
them, but I strongly suspect that he has a problem with static
electricity.
Jamie.
|
1810.18 | Pixies' Tech Manuals | WELLER::FANNIN | Chocolate is bliss | Tue Mar 09 1993 14:24 | 22 |
| Hi Jamie,
Of course I understand that equipment breaks down. But what's
happening in my life right now involves a much higher-than-normal rate
of failure. It's also virtually all electronic.
I'm having some diagnostics done on my home power supply by the utility
company (soon as they can send a guy out) to see if it's a power problem.
But, my sister is convinced that *I* am doing it on a psychic,
supernatural sort of level. That's why I entered this note in this
conference. I'm doing everything I can think of to prevent equipment
failure by normal acceptable methods.
But this is DEJAVU! This is a conference on psychic stuff! So I want
to play in the sandbox here. My repair people will tell me if I have
dirty power or chicken bones in the disposal.
I want to hear about ektoplasmic phenomena, love triangles with ghosts,
Brownian motion spirits reorganizing the molecular structure!
Jeez-Louise! This is entertainment!
|
1810.19 | | TNPUBS::PAINTER | angel pranks, swan songs | Wed Mar 10 1993 15:04 | 4 |
|
It *was* a full moon yesterday...
Cindy
|
1810.20 | | HOO78C::ANDERSON | I've got a LA50! | Thu Mar 11 1993 02:41 | 6 |
| Yes and the moon was the closest to the Earth that it has been this
century. Flood alerts were out in case of a repeat of the 1953 disaster
but as the wind was blowing in the opposite direction there was no
danger.
Jamie.
|
1810.21 | Photons bouncin' off the moon | WELLER::FANNIN | Chocolate is bliss | Thu Mar 11 1993 10:08 | 5 |
| I think the full moon has been affecting my brain-type equipment!
I'm sorry for being so "short" in the last couple of messages.
-- Ruth
|
1810.22 | | ERIS::GALE_J | | Sun Mar 14 1993 18:42 | 3 |
| Mercury in retrograde is never good for machines, or so I have heard.
Janet
|
1810.23 | | HOO78C::ANDERSON | I've got a LA50! | Mon Mar 15 1993 05:01 | 5 |
| Mercury in retrograde, is just an illusion, it doesn't really go
backwards. So could you explain how it affects machines? BTW we do not
tend to get more repair calls during this period.
Jamie.
|
1810.24 | JUST A GUESS | STRATA::THOMAS | | Wed Mar 31 1993 08:02 | 21 |
| DEAR RUTH,
I'M NEW HERE AT THE HUDSON FACILITY,SO YOU MAY TAKE THIS AT
WHAT VALUE YOU WISH.
MY EXPERENCE IN THE FEILD OF PARANORMAL ACTIVITIES IS
LIMITED, BUT IT HAS BEEN A GROWING INTEREST SINCE I WAS IN GRADE
SCHOOL.
RESEARCH HAS PROVEN THAT EACH PERSON HAS THERE ON
ELECTORMAGNETIC FIELD,WHICH SOME CALL AN AURA.THIS FIELD IS EFFECTED
BY ONES EMOTINAL MOOD.SOME MORE SENSITIVE PERSON EVOKE A GREAT DEGREE
OF FORCE WHEN EMOTINALLY DISTRESSED. THIS CAN CAUSE REACTIONS IN
ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS.
IN OTHER WORDS, IF YOU ARE HAVING A REAL BAD HAIR DAY, IT MIGHT
EFFECT MORE SENSITIVE ELECTRONIC DEVICES.
SCIENCE HAS ALSO PROVEN THAT CHILDREN,NOT BEING IN FULL
CONTROL OF THIER EMOTION,CAN PRODUCE THE MOST POWERFUL PSYCH
OUTPUT.ALSO KNOWN AS A POLTERGIEST.( THE SPELLING MAY BE WRONG.)
ALL IN ALL, THIS JUST OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD. I'LL LOOK MORE
INTO IT AND SEE WHAT I CAN FIND.
THOMAS
|
1810.25 | | ENABLE::glantz | Mike @TAY 227-4299 TP Eng Littleton | Wed Mar 31 1993 09:56 | 1 |
| My gawd, I know times are tough, but are we still using VT05's in Hudson?
|
1810.26 | What research ? | DWOVAX::STARK | Rogue's scholar | Wed Mar 31 1993 10:09 | 24 |
| > Research has proven that each person has there on
> electormagnetic field,which some call an aura.this field is effected
_Please_ cite your source for this research when you make this
sort of claim here (the claim of 'research has proven', not
neccessarily the claim that an aura exists).
Based on the literature selling poor quality overpriced
"New Age" technologies I often receive in the mail, still based
on Russian literature that turned out to have been partly a hoax,
and based on poor experimental methodologies, I'd say the only 'research'
people who still argue that there is literally a 'biofield' are the ones
that sell the devices and make spectacular profits on them. I could be
wrong, quite honestly, but that's based on what I've seen so far.
I really wish I could find some actual research on this topic,
it's been an interest of mine for years as well.
Btw, I won't argue it's usefulness as a clinical metaphor in healing,
I think that's pretty well established.
kind regards,
todd
|
1810.28 | Conductor not generator. | CADSYS::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Wed Mar 31 1993 12:16 | 30 |
| RE: .27
A fairly reasonable model of a human being (for some purposes :-)) is
as a large, oddly shaped bag of salt water -- something of a conductor
though not a great one by electronic standards. Most electrical
affects on the environment that you see in connection with the human
body -- static electric sparks on dry days, affects on gas discharge
tubes, position in room affecting TV or radio reception, and Kirlian
photography (though this last requires non-uniform conduction not
implied by the bag-of-salt-water model, and a certain amount of
chemical interaction with sweat for some effects to be explained) --
are explainable this way.
Of course, the human body does have an electrical field associated with
it. A lot of our internal mechanism, especially but not exclusively
neural mechanisms, consist of chemically pumping ions from one place
to another, and moving ions create electrical fields. Also our bones
are piezoelectric and so every time we put or release pressure on a
bone a minute electrical current is created. But these electrical
fields are very, very small. It takes a lot of hard work at very close
range to detect them (good enough detection to get any really
high-quality information out of them requires the use of a Faraday
Cage and other mechanisms to screen out the grossly larger
environmental -- including natural -- electrical fields).
That doesn't mean that there is no such thing as the human aura. It
does mean that it has virtually no practical significance if it is
electrical in nature.
Topher
|
1810.30 | Ugly bags of mostly water | DWOVAX::STARK | Canary in a coalmine | Wed Mar 31 1993 15:43 | 8 |
| re: .28,
(Topher compares the body to a conductor of electromagnetic
effects vs. a generator).
That's an interesting way of looking at it. Thanks for the
useful metaphor.
todd
|
1810.31 | another trekkie, huh? | VERGA::STANLEY | what a long strange trip it's been | Wed Mar 31 1993 15:44 | 1 |
| Ugly bags of mostly water... :-)
|
1810.32 | Not that I'd admit. :-) | DWOVAX::STARK | Canary in a coalmine | Wed Mar 31 1993 16:37 | 5 |
| re: .31,
'Trekker' please. 'Trekkies' have pointy false ears and
carry squeaking fluff balls around and debate the wisdom of
Dr. Daistrom using his own engrams for the M-5 prototype.
We Trekkers are way beyond all that silly trivia. ;-) :-)
|
1810.33 | | VERGA::STANLEY | what a long strange trip it's been | Wed Mar 31 1993 17:03 | 6 |
|
Oh... that's right... I forgot... :-)
-< Not that I'd admit. :-) >-
... too late now.. :-)
|
1810.34 | What metaphor? | CADSYS::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Wed Mar 31 1993 17:31 | 16 |
| RE: .30 (todd)
> -< Ugly bags of mostly water >-
I never said ugly! I find many of those bags of water very attractive!
> Thanks for the useful metaphor.
Your welcome, but I don't think I would describe it as a metaphor.
It's somewhere between a model ("start with a spherical cow...") and
a grossly simplified and somewhat distorted literal description --
it just leaves out all the details which are irrelvant to the
discussion. Now if I had said that humans were simply rabbit ear
TV antennas with feet *that* would be a metaphor.
Topher ;-)
|
1810.35 | pointer to material on auras, etc. | TNPUBS::PAINTER | angel pranks, swan songs | Wed Mar 31 1993 18:52 | 12 |
| Re.30
Todd,
You may wish to take a look at "Hands Of Light", by former NASA
physicist Barbara Brennan, a work I've recommended to you and
others many times in this conference.
Unfortunately time has not allowed me to enter contents from that
book or more on Dr.Chopra's work as well.
Cindy
|
1810.36 | | HOO78C::ANDERSON | I've got a LA50! | Thu Apr 01 1993 05:33 | 13 |
| The electrical fields in the body really are very weak. When I was
still running on my own heart I was interested in the ECG (EKG for
Americans) machines. I got some of the conductive pads, stuck them on
my chest and connected them up to an oscilloscope. Now this was a
reasonably sensitive oscilloscope and could measure minute voltages,
but even with it at its most sensitive settings I could barely get a
reading.
Now if it could not move an oscilloscope trace, when provided with a
good connection, I think that the idea of it jumping a gap and
zapping equipment is a bit far fetched.
Jamie.
|
1810.37 | WEIRD VIBES | STRATA::THOMAS | | Thu Apr 01 1993 07:41 | 25 |
| JAMIE,
TRY YOUR EXPARAMENT AGAIN. MAKE SURE YOU HAVE A GOOD CONECTION.
USE SOME CONDUCTIVE GEL, LIKE THAT OF THE STUFF THEY MAY HAVE PUT ON
YOU AT THE HOSPITAL, TO MEASURE YOUR HEART RATE. ALSO MAKE SURE THEY
ARE IN THE CORRECT LOCATIONS.
QUESTION: ARE EKG'S (OR ECG'S) DESIGN THE SAME AS YOUR
OSCILLOSCOPE? THEY PREFORM A SIMILIAR FUNCTION,BUT THEY ARE TOO BOTH
SPACIFICALLY DESIGNED INSTRUMENTS.
AFTER YOU HAVE YOUR SELF ALL RIGED UP TRY SOME EMOTIONAL
EXCERCISES. SEE IF YOU GET A VARIANT IN YOUR READINGS.
TRY TO THINK OF SOME THING EXTREMLY SAD,THEN HAPPY AND SO FORTH.
PLEASE DON'T TAKE THIS THE WRONG WAY, BUT HAVE SOME ONE HIT YOU.
ANGER IS A VERY STRONG EMOTION.
THESE ARE ALL JUST IDEAS, AND THE POINT TO THIS CONFERANCE, I
THOUGHT, WAS TO SPARK DISCUSSION.
THE NEW GUY,LA50,
THOMAS
|
1810.38 | | HOO78C::ANDERSON | I've got a LA50! | Thu Apr 01 1993 08:21 | 16 |
| The pads come with connective gel and were correctly positioned. The
ECG is basically a specialised oscilloscope with very sensitive
amplifiers.
The electrical signals from the body are extremely weak and could not
affect electrical equipment.
I could see the heart beat but only just.
Changing my emotions will have absolutely no effect on my heart beat.
The nerve that is used by the brain to control the heart rate has been
severed.
BTW does you terminal support lowercase?
Jamie.
|
1810.39 | I sing the body electric ... | DWOVAX::STARK | Canary in a coalmine | Thu Apr 01 1993 15:27 | 34 |
| re: .35,
Thanks again for the recommendation, Cindy.
re: Electrical signals,
The claimed biofield I've seen in most literature selling
technology to detect it is NOT the kinds
of low level piezoelectric signals or neural field effects or
magnetic field effects that Topher was referring to,
in my opinion. I don't see how the kind of sensitivity of
those kinds of devices could possibly reliably pick up
such small signals. Influencing the body's electromagnetic
field characteristics is I think a separate topic from detecting them.
It might not even make sense to consider it a 'field' in that
regard, but a receiver of and responder to external fields ?
Is anyone familiar with the device sold as two metallic
screens connected by a conductor, and designed to
be placed on the body to form electrical circuits ?
The ads for it claimed effectiveness in various
psychoactive and healing effects in double blind studies,
but as usual, no references were supplied, and the
person who did the research mysteriously appears as a member
of the organization selling the device, presumably because
he was so impressed by its effectiveness.
re: Topher,
Sorry, I didn't mean to imply that you said 'ugly,'
It was an out of context Star Trek NG reference from
a show when a race of 'nanites,' nanotechnology-like
in organisms, gave their amusing perspective of human beings.
kind regards,
todd
|
1810.40 | | HOO78C::ANDERSON | I've got a LA50! | Fri Apr 02 1993 03:40 | 22 |
| A friend of ours has a rather large library and it contains a wide
range of books, whenever I visit I seem to spend most of my time
reading. One of the books that I read was about Victorian Patient
Medicine Machines.
Back then electricity was just making its entrance to our lives and
bringing many wonders with it. Nearly all the machines contained a
battery for power, a buzzer used to raise the low voltage to a much
higher voltage, a rheostat to provide control and two electrodes to
connect to the patient. Usually there was a lot of decorative extras.
In reality these devices gave a mild, and usually harmless, electric
shock, however the the claims of what they can do are truly wonderful.
You name it, they cured it!
Of course now in this enlightened age we can look back and laugh at the
simple na�ve Victorians, who swallowed it hook line and sinker, spending
their hard earned cash on useless machines. It's a good job that we
now know so much more than they do and we wouldn't waste our money on
such rubbish, would we?
Jamie.
|
1810.41 | this little light of mine... | SAHQ::CAGLE | | Thu Apr 15 1993 12:06 | 25 |
| re: Basenote
And now for something totally different...
Everyone is a channel (not like a medium/channeller, but rather like
a conduit) through which spirit (god) influences the lower planes. As
a channel, the is a certain normal flow rate through each; a vibration.
Everything that that person (channel) is regularly around is permiated
by that vibration. A balance is achieved between the channel/person and
their surroundings. If the person achieves a higher level of
awareness/conciousness, then they become a clearer channel for spirit.
The vibration increases. Karma speeds up. Many thing go wrong;
illness, equipment screws up, other people react to a difference in the
person without understanding why, etc. Eventually, it all settles down
as a new norm is established. The invidual gets accustomed to the new
vibe.
The change in the owner's vibe rate would also be a factor when
acquiring new possessions; especially if they were "used" and owned by
someone with a considerably different vibe.
The bottomline to all this is that we all effect everyone and
everything without even making an effort by being a channel for spirit.
tc
|
1810.42 | | HOO78C::ANDERSON | I've got a LA50! | Fri Apr 16 1993 05:40 | 3 |
| This will come as joyous news to your average repair man.
Jamie.
|
1810.43 | Harder to exorcise a 'complexity' :-) | DWOVAX::STARK | Skin of a living thought | Fri Apr 16 1993 09:50 | 9 |
| > This will come as joyous news to your average repair man.
Nah, they know it. That's why many repair vans in my area have the bumper
sticker that says "S--t Happens" <expletive deleted>. You fix one
problem and cause another one. Spirits are as good an explanation
as 'complexity' or 'insufficient information,' I guess. At least you can
sometimes exorcise a spirit. Complexity just gets you frustrated. :-)
todd
|
1810.44 | waiting for the Angel of Unemployment | SAHQ::CAGLE | | Fri Apr 16 1993 16:14 | 9 |
| .42 It does.
.43 It would be easier to exercise your warranties. (ps: spirit
#:-) not spirits)
.41 OR... it could be ELECTROMAGNETIC GREMLINS... film at 11 #:-)
tc
|