T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1709.1 | Anyone out there know the black veiled figure | ASABET::ESOMS | Manifesting a Dream | Fri Aug 14 1992 20:47 | 7 |
| Shelob is the spider in I believe the Trilogy. The figure of
Shelob in the Pyramid Book catalog is really not Shelob. I
checked with a distributor at one of the gift shows on that one.
He couldn't give me the figures name at the time. Now I'm
even more curious to know who she is.
Joanne
|
1709.2 | | NAC::MANY | | Tue Aug 18 1992 14:52 | 8 |
|
Joanne,
That's interesting, I wonder why they have it as Shelob in the catalog.
If you find out, please let me know.
Ann
|
1709.3 | Will check it out | ASABET::ESOMS | Manifesting a Dream | Tue Aug 18 1992 16:31 | 10 |
| Ann,
I'll see the distributor again in September. Will ask again and
press for an answer. I do like the figure myself and would like
to know more about it.
Ann, do tell us more about your sightings. I'm also interested
in them.
Joanne
|
1709.4 | | NAC::MANY | | Tue Aug 18 1992 19:22 | 14 |
|
Like I said I only saw her three times. I was sitting at my table
outside enjoying a blazing fire in the pit. I felt that someone was
in the yard other than myself and a friend. So I turned to see who it
was and it was the black hooded figure, just casually walking through
the yard, and to myself I said oh wow. I wasn't frightend by her.
At first I thought my eyes were playing tricks on me but when I saw
her the second time I knew it wasn't my eyes. I felt the same every
time I saw her. But you said this distributor said it isn't Shelob.
I think I'll call the catalogs 800, 24 hour number and see what they
can tell me.
A
|
1709.5 | Trilogy fans, help out | ASABET::ESOMS | Manifesting a Dream | Tue Aug 18 1992 20:16 | 26 |
| Ann,
I did that already too. The person I spoke to didn't have
a clue. I also spoke to someone at the store who also didn't
have a clue.
The only reason I know this figure wasn't Shelob was be-
cause I picked the figure up and spoke to the distributor
and he told me which figure was Shelob but couldn't tell
me this figures name (not a very important character, just
interesting in design). I verified this with a Trilogy
expert here who is long gone. He sort of guessed at who
the figure might be, but I can't remember the name.
Anyone out there familiar with the Trilogy and the various
characters? This character is shown as a black hooded
figure (face is covered) and holds a crystal ball and I
believe has one at it's feet.
Also, Trilogy fans, who exactly is Shelob? I know the
figure is a spider, but what does Shelob represent?
Is there another file that deals with the Trilogy? I'm
getting really curious.
Joanne
|
1709.6 | Maybe Shelob, maybe not!? | NAC::MANY | | Tue Aug 18 1992 21:34 | 18 |
|
Joanne,
I called and what they told me was it was a figure someone came up
with and took the name from Dungions and Dragons. They liked the
name so that's what they named it.
Who else is a black hooded figure? Other than the grim reaper?
This has really got me baffeled now.
Now, another thing is, I like spiders, they are very fasinating.
I have a poster of a spider in my living room which covers almost
the whole wall. I have other spiders in my apt., I also have one
hanging from my rear view mirror. Maybe it's a connection with the
spiders and not Shelob. I don't know.
A
|
1709.7 | some answers | CUPMK::WAJENBERG | Patience, and shuffle the cards. | Wed Aug 19 1992 10:06 | 22 |
| Re .5:
See WOOK::TOLKIEN for a conference on Tolkien and his works.
The most notable black-robed figures in Tolkien's "Lord of the Rings"
are the nine Ringwraiths, the chief servants of the villain, Sauron.
Shelob, so far as I can tell from the book or from Tolkien's own
declarations, doesn't symbolize anything, at least no more than any
other horrific monster. She happens to be a giant spider and to fit
into a short genealogy of spider-monsters in Tolkien's stories. She is
the mother of the spiders of Mirkwood (appearing in "The Hobbit," the
companion work to "Lord of the Rings) and "the last child of Ungoliant
to trouble the unhappy world" (Ungoliant being a demon who took spider
shape, appearing in "The Silmarillion," another Tolkien work).
Sounds to me, though, like this art figure was simply designed to be
sorcerously sinister, with no particular connection to Tolkien, and
named at whim.
Earl Wajenberg
|
1709.8 | | VERGA::STANLEY | what a long strange trip it's been | Wed Aug 19 1992 10:55 | 1 |
| There is a hooded figure holding a lantern in Tarot, isn't there?
|
1709.9 | | MILKWY::ED_ECK | Rambo Among the Roses | Wed Aug 19 1992 11:28 | 3 |
|
Possibly Sauron with the palantir (sp? cyrstal globes used to see
far off events?)
|
1709.10 | | REGENT::BROOMHEAD | Don't panic -- yet. | Wed Aug 19 1992 13:01 | 4 |
| No, no. *Saruman* with the palantir. He often went hooded and cloaked.
(Gandalf wore a hat, not a hood.)
Ann B.
|
1709.11 | | NOPROB::JOLLIMORE | In the Concrete Jungle | Wed Aug 19 1992 13:48 | 7 |
| .10 Ann
But Saruman was not black-hooded. (Was he?) He was Saruman the
White (or Saruman the many-colored) until Gandalf (the Grey)
banished him.
Jay
|
1709.12 | Who is the hooded figure in Pyramid's catalog? | ASABET::ESOMS | Manifesting a Dream | Wed Aug 19 1992 15:28 | 21 |
| Earl,
This figure is one of many figures offered. The line is many
characters from the Trilogy. This one particular figure is
a specific character with a name as are each of the others.
Basically everything in this line is a dull black and often
the pieces have Austrian crystal as part of the statue. I
don't know if the figure is really suppost to be black.
The figure really looks better in the catalog. It's very
interesting to look at, but lacks something when you really
see it. Pyramid did the naming, they just named it wrong.
One would think the real name would be on the order blank.
Maybe one should speak to the owner/buyer but try to get
to that person. I'll find out in September when I see this
line again (if they're still at the show and I'm still at
DEC).
Joanne who's been trying to figure this out for over a
year and is glad someone else is interested
|
1709.13 | | SITBUL::GRIFFIN | Practice random kindness and senseless acts of beauty | Wed Aug 19 1992 19:05 | 5 |
| Re: .8
This is the usual representation for the Hermit in the Tarot.
Beth
|
1709.14 | | CARTUN::BERGGREN | movers and shakers | Wed Aug 19 1992 19:57 | 11 |
| Hmmm. It's possible this character may not be a specific
individual, but rather an archetypal manifestation. If so,
it may be helpful to conisder what dark hooded figures
tend to symbolize. They are definately prominent throughout
many cultures and in many stories and legends. Commonly they
signify one who has access to hidden, esoteric knowledge which
can be used for either "good" or "ill" purposes.
(Remember the garb of Obie-One-Canobie in Stars Wars...?)
Karen
|
1709.15 | | MILKWY::ED_ECK | Rambo Among the Roses | Thu Aug 20 1992 09:43 | 13 |
|
(It's been a while; please forgive spellings...)
While Saruman had a palanir at Orthanc, it was Sauron who made the
palantir for the Numimoreans. Sauron also controlled the palantir;
all Sam (?) could see in the Orthanc palantir was the eye of Sauron
(didn't Gandalf wrestle control of that palantir away from Sauron?).
The only crystaline things associted with Sauron (who wore a black
cloak to hide his disfigured face [now there's an archetype for you])
are the palantir.
Ed E.
|
1709.16 | "I didn't _eat_ any chicken salad!" | MILKWY::ED_ECK | Rambo Among the Roses | Thu Aug 20 1992 09:48 | 8 |
|
Dark hooded figures? Odin (also with a disfigured face, having
only one eye)
Moses' face was covered (or otherwise obscured) when he came down from
Mt. Sinai (not by a darkness, though)
(And, of course, Death, in _The Meaning of Life_)
|
1709.17 | time to go back | NAC::MANY | | Thu Aug 20 1992 20:51 | 7 |
|
If noone is living at the old residence, for my landlord was going
to sell the house, I think I'm going to go back, as many nights as it
takes and see if it appears and try to communicate this time.
A
|
1709.18 | | NAC::MANY | | Mon Aug 24 1992 20:25 | 7 |
|
Well, on Saturday I took a ride by the old house and someone is indeed
living their. I don't think it's a good idea to go back.
A
|
1709.19 | Could it be the hermit? | DNEAST::BERLINGER_MA | LIFE IN THE ASTRAL PLANE | Thu Sep 03 1992 12:55 | 11 |
|
re. .06
"who else wears a black hood?" In some tarot decks The
Hermit is pictured that way.
Later,
Mark
|
1709.20 | Sauron | ASABET::ESOMS | Manifesting a Dream | Mon Sep 14 1992 12:22 | 9 |
| Got to speak to a Distibutor this weekend. The figure is actually
named SAURON. Does anyone know about this character?
Sauron is now a piece in a chess set. It's the King and the figure
has taken on a different look, done in pewter and painted black and
has diamond cuts in it and has lost one of the crystal balls. It's
not as interesting as the original.
Joanne
|
1709.21 | About Sauron | CUPMK::WAJENBERG | Superficially normal. | Mon Sep 14 1992 15:17 | 10 |
| Re .20: "Does anyone know about this character?"
Sauron is the chief villain and title character of "The Lord of the Rings"
and is a blend of demon, wizard, and dictator. He hardly appears "on
stage" at all; the viewpoint characters encounter only his goons and
flunkeys. He does own a magical crystal ball, like the figure you
describe, but his most famous possession is the Ring of Power, which is
the center of attention for the whole novel.
Earl Wajenberg
|
1709.22 | Read it. | CADSYS::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Mon Sep 14 1992 16:23 | 17 |
| It hardly seems necessary, but ...
I really do recommend that you read the Trilogy. It may not make you a
better person, but it is fun, and it is at the very least an important
footnote on our cultural heritage at this point. Keep in mind, while
you read it, that many of the elements that you may find "trite" have
become so only because it is such a widely imitated work.
If you enjoy children's literature (but only if you do) you might want
to start with the "prequal", The Hobbit. It is a great story, and does
set some of the background, but it is written to children which turns
some adults off. You don't really need it to appreciate the Lord of
the Rings. Even if you don't like children's literature in general, if
you get "hooked" by the Lord of the Rings, you might want to read The
Hobbit afterwards.
Topher
|
1709.23 | | WMOIS::CONNELL | and still the balefire FLASHES! | Mon Sep 14 1992 17:11 | 18 |
| And if you get hooked by LOTR and/or read the Hobbit, (BTW I heartily
endorse these books and reccommend getting hook on any of Tolkien's
stuff) then you might want to read the Silmarillion, (His creation
epic) or any of the other books he wrote. Many of these are being
released as Lost Tales and Unfinished Tales. They're being edited by
his son. I also reccommend Smith of Wooten-Major and Farmer Giles of
Ham, (All one title) and Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. (Both
Non-Middle Earth books and The Adventures of Tom Bombadil. (Which does
take place on Middle-Earth. Bombadil is kind of an ancient Earth Spirit
who has retired to the Old Forest near the land of the Hobbitts. Here
he has adventures and takes care of that part of the world. It's all he
can manage. He's a Trickster at times and at times he's a friend and a
rescuer. Don't be fooled by his manner. In his domain he is all
powerful. He just chooses not to exercise that power most of the time.
He's my favorite character in Middlearth, next to the Bright Lady
Galadriel and the Ents.
PJ
|
1709.24 | | ASABET::ESOMS | Manifesting a Dream | Mon Sep 14 1992 17:23 | 10 |
| HHHHHHHHHHHHOOOOOOOOOLLLLLLLLLDDDDDDDDDDDDDD on PJ. Got so many things
lined up to read now. Topher, I intro to LOTR was the opera against my
will and every minute was sheer agony so I never picked the books up to
read. Just couldn't do it; however, since you recommend them, I'll
try to squeeze them in. Will start with the Hobbits, I love children's
books.
Thanks,
Joanne
|
1709.25 | | WMOIS::CONNELL | and still the balefire FLASHES! | Mon Sep 14 1992 17:59 | 15 |
| Well, Joanne. If you really don't want to get the full flavor. :-) Just
teasing friend.
Tolkien was very prolific. He didn't finish a lot of stuff, but he sure
got started. I really don't think you should dive into his works like
that. Hobbitt and LOTR (if your of a mind) should suffice and then if
you're interested go on. I was just using this string to spout of on my
favorite characters in the books and on Tolkien in general. I haven't
read the stuff in years as It's to familiar to me and I find myself
skipping to favorite parts and losing the full flavor of the writings.
It's kind of spoiled for me for now. Maybe in another decade or so.
I got a lot to read too.
PJ
|
1709.26 | | HOO78C::ANDERSON | The wettest drought on record. | Tue Sep 15 1992 03:15 | 10 |
| Re .20
>Sauron is now a piece in a chess set. It's the King and the figure
>has taken on a different look, done in pewter and painted black and
>has diamond cuts in it and has lost one of the crystal balls.
Now that is interesting. Hitler was also a Dictator who was reputed to
suffer from cryptorchidism. I wonder if there in any connection.
Jamie.
|
1709.27 | | NOPROB::JOLLIMORE | kids'ey dance and shake der bones | Tue Sep 15 1992 08:20 | 9 |
| LOTR is also available on cassette tapes. There's two
productions; one from Mind's Eye, and one from NPR Playhouse from
the BBC. The BBC one recently became available. I'd taped it off
public radio in the US a number of years ago. It's 26 half hour
episodes, and while it's extremely well done, reading the book is
recommended first. I've read the books 3 times and listened to
the tapes about a dozen times. A great story!
Jay
|
1709.28 | Tolkien Trivia | CUPMK::WAJENBERG | Superficially normal. | Tue Sep 15 1992 09:48 | 24 |
| Re .23:
Just as a small point of information, "Gawain and the Green Knight" is
not an original work of Tolkien's; instead, it is Tolkien's translation
of an anonymous work in (I think) Middle English, written in
alliterative verse. Tolkien's translation preserves the meter, the
alliteration, and the occasional rhyming. It's a brilliant job of
translation. The story itself is one of the tales of the knights of
King Arthur's Round Table.
Re .26:
"The Lord of the Rings" was written, at least partly, during World War II,
so it is certainly possible that Hitler in particular or dictators in
general supplied Tolkien with his imagery for his villains. However,
many people have gone on to suppose the the One Ring of Power is an
image of the A-bomb. This is not possible unless you want to suppose
Tolkien was prescient, since he invented the Ring before the A-bomb
became common knowledge, much less a commonly recognized problem.
(I believe Tolkien sent installments of the story to his son while the
latter was stationed with the RAF in Africa.)
Earl Wajenberg
|
1709.29 | | WMOIS::CONNELL | and still the balefire FLASHES! | Tue Sep 15 1992 13:59 | 26 |
| Earl, I knew that about Sir Gawain. Just forgot or didn't think it
relevant to the conversation. Actually it is relevant as some might
enjoy the Middle English version. I was in high school during my 1st
reading of it and only wanted words I could understand. :-) Love the
story though. Thanks for pointing out that it is a translation.
Now as to WWII, again I read this stuff in high school. My 1st copies
were the Ballantine edition. In the LOTR intro, Tolkien has stated that
it's not about WWII. He goes on to make some comparisons and shows that
they are not. I think the Hitler/Sauron - Ring/A-bomb thing is one.
Hobbitts as Jews is another that he blows out of the water.
My Oppinion is that he was very influenced from events around him and
either subconciously or not, created and molded the story to parallel
but not match the events of WWII history, both before and a bit after
this time also. Of course the metaphysical part of it is that this is
all real in a parallel universe and this is their version of WWII. The
Silmarillion does bear some resemblance to Biblical and other creation
stories. Not completely but some.
Then again, it had many influences. The Riders of Rohan as the old West
cavalry for one. I'm sure there are others, but am out of time and
maybe we need a new note. One to discuss fiction in general or Tolkien
in particular and whether it's reality or not.
PJ
|
1709.30 | | BTOVT::BEST_G | disk 3 of 2 | Tue Sep 15 1992 18:25 | 10 |
|
re: .26
Yes, it is disappointing when a figurine loses the balls it originally
had...
;-)
guy
|
1709.31 | Men!!!! | ASABET::ESOMS | Manifesting a Dream | Wed Sep 16 1992 11:24 | 7 |
| .30
Guy,
I'm not going to comment on that one. :^)
Joanne
|
1709.32 | | HOO78C::ANDERSON | The wettest drought on record. | Wed Sep 16 1992 11:36 | 2 |
| Jamie giggles and exits stage left whistling the theme tune from the
film, "Bridge on the River Kwai."
|
1709.33 | longtime Tolkien fan from my Houghton Mifflin days | ATSE::FLAHERTY | Ro Reinke | Wed Sep 30 1992 17:03 | 11 |
| Hi Joanne,
As well as the audio cassettes that Jay mentioned (and which I have a
copy), there are animated video versions of both. I can lend you either or
all, but I also recommend reading the books first. Afterall Joanne,
you have visited Middle Earth and know some hobbits personally...
Ro Reinke ;')
|
1709.34 | A change and another mistake | ASABET::ESOMS | Manifesting a Dream | Wed Oct 07 1992 15:33 | 7 |
| Just got a new Pyramid Catalog last night and the statue
was again offered. They dropped the Shelob name and re-
placed it with Queen of Middle Earth. Won't they get it
straight. Now I wonder about the other things they offer
there, do they have any idea about them?
Joanne
|
1709.35 | | HOO78C::ANDERSON | The wettest drought on record. | Thu Oct 08 1992 05:02 | 6 |
| Re .34
Goodness me Joanne, you are not suggesting that the publishers of the
catalog are charlatans just out to make a quick buck from the gullible.
Jamie, currently shocked to the core at the very idea.
|
1709.36 | | ASABET::ESOMS | Manifesting a Dream | Thu Oct 08 1992 10:43 | 6 |
| Jamie,
No, I just like people to get things straight. If they mess up
on this one, what do they do to other things they sell?
Joanne who likes to know what the item is "really"
|
1709.37 | | VERGA::STANLEY | what a long strange trip it's been | Thu Oct 08 1992 10:47 | 4 |
|
> Joanne who likes to know what the item is "really"
Ohhhhhhhhhhh... that's a murky swamp to get into, Joanne... ;-)
|