T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1687.1 | If you don't like this place, why must we find another. | CADSYS::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Tue Jun 23 1992 13:56 | 14 |
| We don't need a file for those who aren't serious about dejavu topics
-- we already have one: DEJAVU which is also a file for those who *are*
serious about the topics here. It's a richer more interesting place to
be because there is a wide variety of attitudes and opinions. Its
frequently the most sincerely interested who make the light remarks. I
see no reason to believe that relaxed humor interferes with serious
answers -- if no one makes a serious remark about something, it is
probably because no one has something serious to say that they consider
worth saying.
This is an extended conversation amoung friends and aquaintenances, not
a seminar or a church meeting.
Topher
|
1687.2 | What behaviour d'ya mean exactly? | FORTY2::CADWALLADER | Reaping time has come... | Tue Jun 23 1992 14:29 | 19 |
| � NOTHING TO DO OTHER THAN EXTRAPOLATE BS
What do you mean by this exactly: (seriously)
Put forward wacky ideas as gospel?
Argue against all & sundry for the hell of it?
Just use the notesfile to crack jokes? (oops - sounds like me :-) )
Antagonise believers with pushed skepticism & argument?
Can you clarify?
Got to go now....
Regards,
- JIM CAD*
|
1687.3 | My 2 pennies | MR4DEC::LSIGEL | That was just a dream | Tue Jun 23 1992 15:27 | 3 |
| I think this notesfile is the most interesting, and informative, and I
learned a lot from it, from serious noters that are serious about the
subject matter and that is no joke.
|
1687.4 | My experience | VS2K::GENTILE | Teamlinks for Windows | Wed Jun 24 1992 10:22 | 13 |
| I may have had the attitude expressed in .0 when I first came in. I wondered
why there wasn't serious disussion about some topics I was passionate in and
why everyone didn't think exactly like me. I have since gone to dinner with
members of this conference and found them to be some of the nicest and most
interesting people that I ever known. I found that if I asked things in a
good way and people had something to say about the topic, they responded and
helped. If people don't know, they won't. I also am starting to find that
humor is important. It is something that I was missing in my life and I have
prayed to get back.
People will appear when it is right for you to know something.
Sam
|
1687.5 | | VS2K::GENTILE | Teamlinks for Windows | Wed Jun 24 1992 10:24 | 7 |
| P.S> I have also learned that it is valuable to hear all opinions about
something. There is no use in banning people from this notes conference who
don't agree or think differntly. There are lessons to be learned from all
people.
Sam
|
1687.6 | | FORTY2::CADWALLADER | Reaping time has come... | Wed Jun 24 1992 10:55 | 10 |
| RE: .4
Hmmm... I think I agree too now you've reminded me, when I first entered nobody
seemed to bother answering anything I put in and there just seemed to be
"cliquey" chat between people that obviously knew each other. Then I got to
realise that people here *are* nice enough, they just didn't answer because they
didn't know and possibly because I hadn't (and haven't - {blush} ) bothered to
sign in to be recognised as a new regular reader!
- JIM CAD*
|
1687.8 | My thoughts on this... | WLDWST::WARD_FR | Seeking more mystical adventure | Wed Jun 24 1992 12:44 | 43 |
| Well, also it has to do with available time and motivation.
I don't have the time I used to; also, too many things are repetitive
and have been discussed in the past and simply aren't that interesting
on a personal level anymore. For instance, I dislike talking about
everyone's dreams so I mostly don't read about them. I also dislike
astrology and don't read most of that stuff. We've already discussed
God a zillion times but I find that I occasionally like to say
something. I still like sex so I may find myself saying something
around that.
You know, we all grow in different ways. Most of us, however,
can recognize that an infant may be far more interested in its
navel than we, as grown-ups/adults, care to be. Nothing's wrong
with contemplating the navel, but most of us have done it already
and aren't interested in repeating the experience. If we believe
and accept concepts such as reincarnation, then we can appreciate
the fact that we probably already had lifetimes wherein we
experienced loads of other things. If we learn how to tap into
them (reincarnational lifetimes,) then we can "own" them and not
need to re-experience them.
There are fine balances all over the place; for example, how
to distinguish between compassion and attaching to someone else's
drama, whether to be an observer or whether to be a participant,
whether to direct events in our lives or allow ourselves to be
directed, whether to read in DEJAVU or to also read/write/respond,
etc.
As for humor, it's difficult to judge or assess it based on
one or two entries. There can be lots of reasons for humor.
When the humor hurts someone, then it's not likely to be adult
humor. Adult humor is valuable but it is different than the
child's or adolescent's. When skepticism becomes cynicism things
go downhill rapidly, too.
I feel that newcomers should not necessarily expect that their
information will be seized as long-awaited food for the starving.
Rather, they can survey the territory already covered and can
either add to it or question it or can come up with fresh new
information or a new perspective, etc. But to expect people to
jump on someone's dream and to demand to have it analyzed, for
example, seems too much to me---at any rate, it's not something
I would want to do.
Frederick
|
1687.9 | not that this is what you actually *meant* ;-) | BTOVT::BEST_G | not | Wed Jun 24 1992 12:54 | 14 |
|
re: .8 (Frederick)
>We've already discussed God a zillion times....
Ha ha ha ha! I love it!
"Where have you been....we've already discussed this God character
and the subject is really quite pointless, you know....we figured
out His game a long time ago..."
;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-)
guy
|
1687.11 | what brought that on? | CARTUN::MISTOVICH | | Wed Jun 24 1992 13:45 | 8 |
| Dougie,
Personal attacks on people are generally considered unacceptable in
Notes files. Frederick was attacking any individual -- just stating
his perceptions and opinions about feelings and behaviors of people
in a general way.
Mary
|
1687.12 | Obligatory Bloody Smiley | WELLIN::NISBET | Let me see that Hymn sheet ... | Wed Jun 24 1992 14:32 | 4 |
| ah.... Perhaps I forgot the OBS ...
dougie
|
1687.13 | | WELLIN::NISBET | Let me see that Hymn sheet ... | Wed Jun 24 1992 14:33 | 2 |
| OK Mary- it's gone.
|
1687.14 | | WELLIN::NISBET | Let me see that Hymn sheet ... | Wed Jun 24 1992 14:40 | 9 |
| For the benefit of the "What did .10 say" brigade, I inferred that
Frederick's comments on cynicisms were somewhat hypocritical.
I have found Frederick's notes a tad condescending, and the contemptous
undertones distasteful. My interpretation off course.
pip pip
Dougie
|
1687.15 | Re.-1 | TNPUBS::PAINTER | Mark Russell for pres | Wed Jun 24 1992 16:13 | 4 |
|
All part of Valuing Differences, Dougie.
Cindy
|
1687.16 | Humor, etc. | TNPUBS::PAINTER | Mark Russell for pres | Wed Jun 24 1992 16:21 | 21 |
|
As for .0
Something similar happens over in the Dave Barry file, for some
God-only-knows reason. The guy is by far one of the best humor writers
being published today, and it would seem to follow that the people who
access that conference have similar senses of humor and be rather
easy-going about the whole thing.
But NOOOOO. If anyone starts a 'friendly chat' -- anything beyond
Dave's writings or announcing an upcoming appearance, then all hell
breaks loose, people whine and complain, and then the moderator
automatically writelocks the topic, along with a harsh 'reminder'. [One
is left wondering if the whiners actually laugh when they read DB, or
- to follow DB style - if they even have a sense of humor -...but that's
for speculation.]
Please don't try to make DEJAVU like that. I couldn't bear it. I
might even cry or something.
Cindy (now noting here for close to 5 years now)
|
1687.17 | No place like DEJAVU | ESMAIL::ESOMS | Trusting in the Universe | Wed Jun 24 1992 16:35 | 17 |
| Dejavu is the best conferences we have. The people here are
wonderful and many do know each other (you're always welcome
to attend one of the gatherings tho I've let it slide a bit -
we'll do another dinner soon) but new comers and readers are
also welcome and respected.
Everyone's style, ability, and situation is different. We
need these differences to build on. I enjoy the humor, the
serious writings, and even the off the wall material. I
do care for Frederick and I do enjoy his writings (especially
the Lazarus material). Each add to what this place is. We
share and learn together and what challenges us, might just be
the place we need to check out and work on.
Hang in there, there is no place like DEJAVU.
Joanne
|
1687.18 | Where is John Mitchell these days, anyway? :-) | WLDWST::WARD_FR | Seeking more mystical adventure | Wed Jun 24 1992 17:15 | 14 |
| re: Dougie-somewhere-back
Really? Odd, isn't it? Odd, because I would or could have
said the same about you and your contributions in here.
Re: .17 (Joanne)
Thanks. By the way, it's LazarIs, not LazarUs. ;-)
Frederick
|
1687.19 | Side talk | REGENT::BROOMHEAD | Don't panic -- yet. | Thu Jun 25 1992 13:44 | 9 |
| Why the Dave Barry conference cuts discussion short:
A lot of DB readers open the DB conference only when their automated
processes show an unseen note. They then dash in, hoping for one of
Dave's gems. If it's only aimless chitchat, they are *very*
disappointed, so aimless chitchat is vigorously squelched. Useful
and/or entertaining comments are tolerated.
Ann B.
|
1687.21 | Keep it going !!! | MR4DEC::LSIGEL | Ride the Painted Pony | Thu Jun 25 1992 17:30 | 2 |
| I think the seriousness is great, and the humor lightens it up! Keep on
pluggn' DEJAVU you guys are great!
|
1687.22 | | PLAYER::BROWNL | Let them go | Fri Jun 26 1992 05:13 | 4 |
| I'm with Ann on this one. I like the way DAVE_BARRY is moderated, and I
don't need the chit-chat, even if it is DB related.
Laurie.
|
1687.23 | | SALSA::MOELLER | UN*X - vwl cnsmr, mnd bndr | Fri Jun 26 1992 15:32 | 5 |
| I'd like to hear more from the author of .0, COMET::ANDERSONA, about
what triggered the fairly heated, all-caps topic, and what s/he thinks
about the replies thus far.
karl
|
1687.24 | An enlightening conference | COMET::FARMER | | Thu Jul 09 1992 20:42 | 8 |
| Although I do not know any of the noters in this conference, I am
very interested with what you all have to say. It is an enlightening
conference to be sure. Many points of view are brought out here with
which many I would never have contemplated. Thank you all and keep
the notes (and humor) flowin.
Drew
|
1687.25 | A couple of pennies for ya.... | NEST::REED | Safe Sax & Violins | Wed Jul 15 1992 13:32 | 17 |
| Thanks to DEJAVU I've met some wonderful, warm, caring, enlightened
people. I've also been able to expand my knowledge, experiences and
growth due to the information that has been shared here. Though I
haven't been able to read and respond as much as I'd like, I do find
the varying philosophies, ideas, beliefs, experiences, etc. enriching
and thoroughly enjoy the conversations that take place. I don't have to
agree with everyone...I take what I need (whether it's what I *want* or
not ;^) and leave the rest.
I'm thankful for this notesfile and all the people who participate even
if it's on a read-only basis. It has provided me with so much. And I
find the humor is sometimes just the break you need to step back and
take a better look at yourself. Life is too short to be taken so
seriously all the time....plus laughter gives you fewer wrinkles. ;^D
TTFN,
Roslyn
|