T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1667.1 | | CGVAX2::CONNELL | It's my party and I'll scry if I want to. | Mon May 11 1992 12:52 | 5 |
| Written Communication - Electronic
Do you want more or is that enough?
PJ
|
1667.2 | all of the above | DSSDEV::GRIFFIN | Practice random kindness and senseless acts of beauty | Mon May 11 1992 14:12 | 0 |
1667.3 | try that again | DSSDEV::GRIFFIN | Practice random kindness and senseless acts of beauty | Mon May 11 1992 14:14 | 7 |
| Actually, I believe that the most direct method is determined on a
person to person basis, as well as the information being transmitted.
If you know the person well enough, the best is Oral, face to face. Or
you may know them well enough that best is written, electronic or
paper. IMHO, there is no one best way to communicate.
Beth
|
1667.4 | | ENABLE::glantz | Mike @TAY 227-4299 TP Eng Littleton | Mon May 11 1992 16:14 | 2 |
| You left out "other". I can think of several.
|
1667.5 | "There are many ways of speaking" | YOSMTE::WILKES_EL | | Mon May 11 1992 16:51 | 7 |
| I tend to agree with Mike.
It depends on the type of communication.
For example sometimes body language says more than verbage.
Ellen
|
1667.6 | | ENABLE::glantz | Mike @TAY 227-4299 TP Eng Littleton | Mon May 11 1992 17:07 | 12 |
| Actually, oral face-to-face is a mode in which body-language
communication could occur. But mentioning it points out the some of the
limitations of the question as phrased in the base note.
I was thinking more along the lines of the following other
possibilities, which were not listed:
- video-conferencing
- recording technologies (audio, video)
- physical contact (guess :-)
- paranormal (e.g. "telepathic", etc)
|
1667.7 | | CAPITN::WILKES_EL | | Tue May 12 1992 16:22 | 27 |
|
RE: BASE NOTE
To rate these forms of communication as you have presented them, I feel
that oral communication is the first in my rating because in involves
being in the now with the person if open communication is to really
take place. It also has the most risk because the communication can
involve not only the language but the tonality of the voice, phrasing
can come into play and body language can also be interpreted (to name a
few).
My second choice would be by telephone. Again I feel there is more of
an opportunity to pick up on cues from tonality and phrasing. However,
the body language is not involved.
Third would be electronic. Because most of us have limited time with
this form of communication, we tend to transmit our thoughts as they
are received.
My final choice would be writing, basically because of the opportunity
to rewrite. However, this could also be number one because if done
properly, it's an opportunity to really express our feelings.
I don't know if this is what you are looking for, but if it is, I hope
it helps.
Ellen
|
1667.8 | | ASSURE::SYBIL | | Thu May 14 1992 03:58 | 29 |
|
I had to really think about answering your question...
I started out to say I'm frank and direct all the time
with all these modes of communication but in reality it
is sooo EASY communicate on the terminal in a detatched
indirect way and very hard to communicate face to face
indirectly/detached.
It's funny you asked such a question today because just
today I was talking to a friend on the phone while write
a note to him on the phone function about something
completely different. We wanted to see if we could carry
two conversations at once. One by audio and the other visually.
I was really silly after a while because we saw each other
all day and talking twice as much made it harder to think of
new things to say during BOTH conversations.
Michelle
P.S.- I use to have a rule when talking on the phone that
the other person turn the TV off because no MATTER WHAT
it will grab your attention from the phone conversation.
I don't really mind it now because I have noticed I am
able to process many different types of communication
better now that I have been by communicating in this forum.
You make since of it...
|
1667.9 | | HOO78C::ANDERSON | Sold to the man in the silly hat. | Mon May 18 1992 10:15 | 16 |
| It depends on what you are communicating.
Face to face with massive aid of body language conveys the most
information about what the speaker is saying and how you are receiving.
It is also bi-directional, in that you can ask questions and receive
instant answers. However written communication can be referred to at a
later. Also written communications have the additional dimension of
graphics.
Electronics have the advantage of speed, letting you communicate at a
distance. The telephone and video conference convey some but not all
body language. The notefile conveys none, but it has its place in that
it can often put you in direct contact with an expert.
Jamie.
|
1667.10 | use the Vulcan MindMeld wherever possible | SALSA::MOELLER | snarling NETcrank | Mon May 18 1992 16:17 | 6 |
| I've a big sign over my desk, created with DECwrite, that says
"Neither MINDREADING nor the WRITTEN WORD are effective forms of
communication."
karl
|
1667.11 | | WMOIS::VAILLANCOURT | love my passion | Tue May 26 1992 13:21 | 6 |
|
I think it all depends on WHAT you want to communicate and with WHOM.
Diane
|