T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1510.1 | | AOXOA::STANLEY | My dog he turned to me and he said... | Fri Jul 26 1991 16:15 | 7 |
| Sure, I really enjoyed the Castenada series myself. When I got to "The Eagle's
Gift", I went back and reread everything from "The Teachings of Don Juan" on up
just to refamiliarize myself. These books had the greatest impact on my
esoteric outlook. I don't know if they're true or not either but that doesn't
negate the enjoyment I got from them.
Dave
|
1510.3 | | AOXOA::STANLEY | No time to hate... | Wed Jul 31 1991 16:55 | 8 |
| re: tonal and nagual
I meant to reply to this sooner and was reminded by your sign in note. Anyway,
it is my understanding that tonal refers to anything in this physical world.
Nagual is the unknown or things outside of this world. I'll have to go back to
the book to refresh my memory of Don Juan's explaination.
Dave
|
1510.4 | Thanks and More Questions | BCSE::SUEIZZ::GENTILE | ALL-IN-1 FILECAB TOOLKIT FOR MS/DOS | Wed Jul 31 1991 17:23 | 11 |
|
Thanks for your response Dave. I had also forgotten to reply to this note. I
talked to someone by phone about it and the answers were quite similar to what
you wrote.
tonal - thing in the physical world that attention is focused on
nagual - all of the other possibilities there are.
I am fascinated with Carlos "seeing" people as "luminous eggs". How is
this done? I know that they used the drugs on him first because of his
sturborness. Also what is meant by the concept of non-doing? I think it
has something to do with not pre-conceiving?
|
1510.5 | Not-doing Defined | TEAM01::TEAM10::SCHNEIDER | | Wed Jul 31 1991 18:39 | 27 |
| re: .4
>>> what is meant by the concept of non-doing? I think it has something to
>>> do with not pre-conceiving?
Doing is the process of focusing the will to assemble a physical
reality. The natural laws of the physical reality are a direct
consequence of the "doing" of all of the lumious beings who assemble in
it.
The process of "not-doing" is the defocusing of the will from a
physical reality and results in a shift (usually subtle) in the
assemblage point. This shift in the assemblage point is referred to as
"stopping the world" in Casteneda's books. When this partial detachment
from the reality occurs, the laws of the reality are suspended directly
in proportion to the "size" of the shift.
>>> I am fascinated with Carlos "seeing" people as "luminous eggs". How is
>>> this done?
Luminous eggs are seen by doing the "seeing" technique exactly as
described in "Tales of Power". As a hint: the are not "egg" shaped.
|
1510.6 | More and more questions!! | BCSE::SUEIZZ::GENTILE | ALL-IN-1 FILECAB TOOLKIT FOR MS/DOS | Thu Aug 01 1991 09:40 | 12 |
|
Thanks for your answer. As I continue to read, I just keep on generating more
and more questions. I am about 3/4 of the way thru THe Eagle's Gift and I all
confused. I could follow about half the book but now I am lost. Carlos seems
to be dreaming and remembering back to when he met the Silvio Manuel and other
members of the Nagual's party. I don't understand this. Why would he remember
now and not back then(when it happened) and out it in his earlier books? Does
it have something to do with the right side/left side teachings? Also, what is
meant by dreaming in this context? It doesn't seem to be the kind of dreaming
I am used to. He seems to not be doing it when he is sleeping.
Sam
|
1510.7 | read them many times | GAIN::SHUMAKER | All in the mind of the Buddha... | Thu Aug 01 1991 14:14 | 28 |
| I have read his books many times over. I recommend that you read all
the books through the last one, "Power of Silence." Power of Silence is
more clear. Carlos was sorting a lot of things out for himself in the
earlier books, although there is a lot of useful information in them if
you can side step Carlos' own obsessions and focus on the messages from
don Juan, etc..
Also, try reading "Hands of Light" by Barbara Brennen for information
on the luminous cocoon - aura. Her new book coming out in the fall -
"Light Emerging" - talks of levels beyond the aura: the hara line -
ie. the level of intention; and the core star - ie. the level of
localized individuated god or essence. In my opinion, the aura is the
level for mastering awareness and the hara line is the level for
mastering intent.
I believe the nagual and the tonal are used to describe the nature of
our self identity. We tend to define ourselves with our "inventory of
the mind." The nagual is a way of pointing to reality beyond our
rational/linear mind and inventory, that is available to us when we
learn to silence the mind (internal dialogue) and go beyond our
self-definitions. It is the un-named reality.
I got the impression, from Power of Silence, that their might be 2
more books to cover the remaining "abstract cores." I also heard a
rumor that Carlos was on a plane to South America that crashed. Any
substance to these rumors?
Wayne
|
1510.8 | Luminous Egg .ne. Aura | TEAM01::TEAM10::SCHNEIDER | | Thu Aug 01 1991 15:15 | 7 |
| re: .7 (Wayne)
The luminous egg and the aura are two different layers, not the same
thing. The aura is actually a maifestation of the "dreaming body" in
Casteneda's terminology.
Kevin
|
1510.9 | | ATSE::FLAHERTY | Enlighten up!! | Thu Aug 01 1991 15:50 | 7 |
| Kevin (.8),
I agree with Wayne's terminology - the whole 7? layers being the aura.
The 'dreaming body' I would suspect is the astral body.
Ro
|
1510.10 | | WILLEE::FRETTS | I'm part of you/you're part of me | Thu Aug 01 1991 15:58 | 6 |
|
Or the etheric body. I was never quite sure what it was when he
referred to his 'double' actually doing things and taking action.
Carole
|
1510.11 | I'm confused again - so what else is new | BCSE::SUEIZZ::GENTILE | ALL-IN-1 FILECAB TOOLKIT FOR MS/DOS | Thu Aug 01 1991 16:00 | 7 |
|
You people have lost me in the last few notes. I am a beginer in this area.
Can someone explain auras? What is the 'dreaming body'? How is a luminous
egg different than an aura? What is maent by crossing the eyes in reference
to 'Seeing'?
Sam
|
1510.12 | Terminology differences | TEAM01::TEAM10::SCHNEIDER | | Thu Aug 01 1991 16:20 | 16 |
| re .9, .10
The statement made in .8 is based upon my apprenticeship in Warrior
traditions that used the same terminology as Carlos.
As part of my apprenticeship, I rode the web and explored the layers of
the body, on a detailed basis, and I carefully noted the
interconnections and the order in which they occur. The statements
which I made in .8 are correct based upon the terminology of the
Southwestern traditions in which Carlos trained. The etherial body and
the astral body are not the luminous egg as alluded to in .9 and .10.
I have seen all three, and they are different.
To avoid getting into a rathole, I will be happy to discuss the
difference, offline, with anyone who has direct experience seeing the
luminous egg and differs with my opinion.
|
1510.13 | | WILLEE::FRETTS | I'm part of you/you're part of me | Thu Aug 01 1991 17:01 | 14 |
|
RE: .12
Hi there,
My .10 was only a suggestion. I don't know what the luminous egg
is in relation to our subtle bodies. If you know, please share it
here. Can you tell us what the luminous egg is? Can you tell us
what the "double" is? Do they have *any* relationship to the astral
body or any of the other subtle bodies?
Thanks,
Carole
|
1510.14 | gosh, maybe some pointers? | SFCPMO::CABANYA | | Thu Aug 01 1991 18:27 | 15 |
| RE: 12
I, too, would be VERY interested in whatever information you could
share
regarding this process. Did you have a guide - (maybe you discussed
that and I missed it), is this something we can do by ourselves? I've
only managed to do lucid dreaming from reading his books.
Would REALLY appreciate some pointers from someone whose had
actual experience!
Thanks!
Mary
|
1510.15 | Information on Warriorship Training | TEAM01::TEAM10::SCHNEIDER | | Thu Aug 01 1991 19:22 | 44 |
| re: .13 & .14 (Mary & Carole, I think?)
The process of "seeing" these layers and precisely defining them was
one of the last steps that I had to do for my benefactor. This all
occurred as part of a 5 year apprenticeship which I completed in
November of 1989, in a tradition which is simply called "Warriorship".
My benefactor was N'dolka, a Warrior from the Tucson area. He was
awakened by Bees Koon (Phillip Cassedore), the late spiritual leader of
the San Carlos Tineh (Apache), and by Don Felice, the warrior trainer
of the Aymura Indians of South America.
Learning the layers of the body is something that one can practice
alone. However, it is not the important part of the path. The
important part of the path, just as it was in Carlos' case, is to
become "human" by stopping personal indulgence. The "seeing" of the
layers is simply one of a series of empowerment activities that a
student undertakes. It is a "parlor trick" for lack of a better
description.
If you are interested in the things that I studied, I can be reached
offline at the above mail address. If you are interested, you can
reach N'dolka at the following:
N'dolka
c/o Warriorship
Box 11801
Tucson, Az.
I suggest you reference my name (Tagliato) and this notes conference in
your letter to him. It will help him to know that he can get in touch
with me if he has any questions on the things we have discussed in this
note.
To the rest of the readers... Sorry for the divergence from the topic
at hand!
Y'elan,
Kevin
p.s. all of the usual dislaimers apply... I do not profit in any way
(except personal spiritual growth) from any association with the above
organization, and the address above is provided solely for the
information of the readers of this conference, etc. etc. etc.
|
1510.16 | Warriorship sounds intriguing | GAIN::SHUMAKER | All in the mind of the Buddha... | Fri Aug 02 1991 12:14 | 50 |
|
.re .8, .11 Hi Kevin.
If you read the complete description of the human energy field - HEF -
(aura) in Barbara Brennan's book, I think it could qualify as the luminous
cocoon per Carlos Castanada's descriptions, although I admit I am
speculating. In Barbara's book there is a description, of the 7 layers of
the HEF. The outer layer (7th) looks like an egg shape, almost with a skin
about 1/2 inch thick. The astral body would be one layer, 4th layer, of the
HEF and would correspond to the dreaming body or astral body.
Seeing, as I understand it, would correspond to High Sense Perception in
Barbara's book. My belief is that if Barbara Brennan is somewhat scientific
in her approach, ie. tries to be objective about what she sees and knows,
then she will come up with similar results as other serious spiritual
disciplines (.vs. religions). Hence I feel comfortable in equating the two,
but I would prefer to be able to see for myself. I am particularly
fascinated with the "idea" of the assemblage point and as of yet, have not
see a clear corollary in other traditions (other than "states of mind").
My own practice has not focused that much on the HEF. ZEN tends to down
play most phenomenon and visions and focus on clearing your mind. That is
also why I feel Zen, in comparison, which focuses almost exclusively on the
hara point, corresponds to the hara line that Barbara Brennan talks about
in her soon-to-be-release new book. The hara line - the level of intention
- is a level (dimension) deeper than the HEF and no longer at the level of
personality. At least, that is my understanding. According to Barbara, most
Americans have their hara lines bent and disconnected from the hara point
(place of power 1-2 inches below the navel) and the seat of spiritual
longing (just above the heart chakra). They have lost their spiritual
purpose and tend to discredit most true spiritual activities. (They are in
spiritual pain.) I believe, and again I am speculating, that reconnecting
with intent (Castanada) is the same as realigning the hara line (Brennan).
Barbara said that people she has observed who do serious spiritual practice
tend to have a straight and connected hara line.
I am always interested in spiritual paths. Carlos Castanada's books have
resonated with me long before Zen did. I prefer a path that can integrate
as much as possible. I have seen very good teachers try to discredit
another's path (especially within Zen and Christianity - the two I have had
the most exposure to). Maybe they had good reasons, I don't know. Who is to
say what is right for an individual - power decides right? All we do is
learn to acquiesce. At some point you have to believe in your own
connection.
Any info you can give, off-line or on-line I would greatly appreciate. I am
most interested in practical experience .vs. technical knowledge.
Thanks,
Wayne
|
1510.17 | Thoughts on Brennan and God | TEAM01::TEAM10::SCHNEIDER | | Fri Aug 02 1991 13:15 | 35 |
| re: .16 (Wayne)
>>> If you read the complete description of the human energy field - HEF -
>>> (aura) in Barbara Brennan's book, I think it could qualify as the
>>> luminous cocoon per Carlos Castanada's descriptions...
I have read her book and studied it for comparison. In my experience
and in the terminaolgy of S/W Indian Warriorship, they are different.
>>> My belief is that if Barbara Brennan is somewhat scientific in her
>>> approach, ie. tries to be objective about what she sees and knows, then
>>> she will come up with similar results as other serious spiritual
>>> disciplines
Agreed. In fact the pictures she uses and most of the text agree with
my experience (which occurred before I read the book.
>>> I am particularly fascinated with the "idea" of the assemblage point
>>> and as of yet, have not see a clear corollary in other traditions
The assemblage point is a literal physical point of focus in the
luminous egg. It is clearly releated to a space-time intersection in
modern physics, particularly superstring theory.
>>> most Americans have their hara lines bent and disconnected from the
>>> hara point (place of power 1-2 inches below the navel) and the seat of
>>> spiritual longing (just above the heart chakra). They have lost their
>>> spiritual purpose and tend to discredit most true spiritual activities.
Yes, or to put it in Warriorship terms, they have lost the direct
connection to God.
|
1510.18 | | VERGA::STANLEY | What a long strange trip it's been... | Fri Aug 02 1991 14:23 | 3 |
| I think we found it again though.
Mary
|
1510.19 | Not the America I know... | TEAM01::TEAM10::SCHNEIDER | | Fri Aug 02 1991 14:41 | 11 |
| re: .18
If you are referring to the connection with God, and to most Americans,
I disagree based upon the observable evidence as defined by my
tradition.
We are all part of God, but not all people are connected back to God.
In fact most are not!
Y'elan
Kevin
|
1510.20 | Lost dreams and found dreams in America.. our America.. | VERGA::STANLEY | What a long strange trip it's been... | Fri Aug 02 1991 16:39 | 12 |
| I'm not familiar with your tradition, Kevin... but you may be right
that not all Americans are connected back to God yet... but a link
has been made... and from that link shall grow a whole new reality.
From one little ethernet shall many clusters grow :-).
God loves the American people and all of humanity... I know that to
be true... and they will know it too in time... as soon as they
wake up to whom and what they truly are... as soon as they find their
place and purpose in this mystery we call existence.
Mary
|