T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1490.1 | | WILLEE::FRETTS | mm-mM-MM!!!! | Tue Jun 25 1991 16:51 | 8 |
|
Hmmmm....it was sounding good until they mentioned UNIX and C. How
the heck can we trust them now?
;^)
Carole
|
1490.2 | Doubtful... | WBC::BAKER | Joy and fierceness... | Wed Jun 26 1991 13:34 | 17 |
| re: .0
That's an interesting notion, but what about all the
documentary evidence of Mr Bell's existence -- like his
birth certificate, and *LOTS* of photos (from newspapers
and other sources). A.G.Bell is just close enough to
contemporary times that there exists a lot of evidence
proving his reality -- as well as the reality of his work
with telephony and with the deaf.
Sounds like someone's imagination has been working overtime.
By the way, the text of the famous quotation is:
"Mr Watson, come here, I want you !"
-Art
|
1490.3 | | ENABLE::GLANTZ | Mike 227-4299 DECtp TAY Littleton MA | Wed Jun 26 1991 14:49 | 13 |
| Personally, I agree with you and find the story dubious. However the
interesting point, for me, was that this story illustrates that if you
or I *today* wanted to prove that Bell existed, we would have a tough
time doing it. A determined and ingenious collaborative effort could,
in principle, have created the history (and birth records) as it now
reads in the books. Trying to disprove that such a hoax was
perpetrated might be impossible. Possibly the strongest evidence you
could come up with that Bell actually existed would be to find someone
still alive today who had met him (and you'd still have to trust that
person's word). Any evidence short of that could, in principle, have
been fabricated. The probability is small today, but would increase in
the future. Sort of the way, today, the entire Jesus story is
considered by many to be fiction or at best highly distorted fact.
|
1490.4 | Naaah. . . | TNPUBS::STEINHART | Pixillated | Wed Jun 26 1991 15:03 | 22 |
| Hey guys (and gals?) - how can you prove that anyone or anything
existed if you didn't see it yourself? You can drive yourself nuts
with this line of thinking.
The standard historical methods rely on birth/baptismal/burial records,
correspondence, published papers and books, and other written records.
For someone as recent as Bell, this is easy.
Occasionally, historical research causes a revision of known facts -
witness the recent exhumation of (I forget which - oops) an earlier
President who is now believed to have been poisoned. But outright hoaxes
and conspiracies are few and far between. (Remember Piltdown Man?)
As you go farther back in time, things get harder to prove. Most proof
rests on written records. It's easy to research Roman emperors, but
much harder to research a relative unknown at that time - as Jesus was.
Written records disintigrate, burn, and are otherwise lost. And in the
days before paper and printing, a lot less was recorded.
Personally, I wouldn't get hung up on this theory.
Laura
|
1490.5 | I wonder... 8-) | CURRNT::GURRAN | My reality or yours ? | Fri Jun 28 1991 05:20 | 14 |
|
Dateline: January 11 2001
DIGITAL LIGHTS THE WAY
Today Digital demonstrated their faster than light processor, which has turned
computing on its head. At the demonstration its inventor, Jeanne Atkinson, was
able to put the new processor into perspective, as it completed the most
complex bench mark tests in one thousandth of the fastest previous time.
A competitor was heard to remark that "this system is out of this world".
8-)
|
1490.6 | how fast is it, johnny? | ENABLE::GLANTZ | Mike 227-4299 DECtp TAY Littleton MA | Fri Jun 28 1991 09:27 | 3 |
| Hmmm, that reminds me of a rumor I heard many years ago about a
soon-to-be-announced new processor from IBM ... "it's so fast, it
executes infinite loops in under two minutes".
|
1490.7 | are court records considered proof? | HOCUS::FERGUSON | Zappa for President in 92 | Sat Jun 29 1991 20:43 | 11 |
| I read a story about Alexander Graham Bell being sued for patenting the
telephone by someone who claimed to have done all the initial
research. I"ll have to dig up the book and find the name. As the story
goes, this guy couldn't get it to work and gave up. Bell then took all
of his research and added a one-quarter turn to a screw connecting the
wires and presto! it worked.
The judge ruled against the person suing because he said that the
quarter turn was what made the phone work, not the initial research.
~vf
|
1490.8 | Who was that masked man ??? | WBC::BAKER | Joy and fierceness... | Mon Jul 01 1991 12:11 | 12 |
| re: .3
> the future. Sort of the way, today, the entire Jesus story is
> considered by many to be fiction or at best highly distorted fact.
Except that here the situation is reversed: The evidence from
biblical archaeologists and various other historical sources
tends to refute Christian accounts of Jesus' life -- the
commonly accepted version apparently being a fabrication of
St Paul which was later codified by the Nicene council. But
that's a topic for another note.... ;-}
|
1490.9 | Get your kicks | TNPUBS::STEINHART | Pixillated | Mon Jul 01 1991 14:52 | 18 |
| RE: .7
My (engineer) hubby's favorite engineer tale:
The experts have gathered around the malfunctioning machine. They've
been working on it day and night, but no luck yet. Finally the oldest
expert walks up and looks at it carefully. He gives it a swift kick in
the pants, and the dang thing starts working. He then asks for an
enormous fee. The customer pays.
Later at the bar, the frustrated experts ask the senior, "How can you
ask - and get - so much money just for kicking the machine?"
The senior replies, "I wasn't paid for the kick. I was paid for
knowing where to kick."
Laura
|
1490.10 | | CSLALL::FARNHAM | | Mon Aug 26 1991 14:28 | 3 |
|
|
1490.11 | Hello . . . .Hello . . . . | CSLALL::FARNHAM | | Mon Aug 26 1991 14:31 | 2 |
| One wonders how the existence of the telephone has helped "the club" to
guide human development.???
|
1490.12 | | MACROW::GLANTZ | Mike 227-4299 DECtp TAY Littleton MA | Mon Aug 26 1991 14:43 | 2 |
| I dunno, maybe the dial tone, ring tone, and busy signal have
subliminal messages encoded in them ("buy pepsi").
|