T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1453.1 | | RIPPLE::GRANT_JO | lifted waters walk and leap | Fri Apr 12 1991 10:46 | 7 |
| re: .0
I'm already about 99.9% happy. But you can help me achieve
that last .1% by giving us the punch line here.
Joel
|
1453.2 | Don't be greedy. ;-) | SML1DR::STARK | | Fri Apr 12 1991 12:44 | 5 |
| re: .1,
Sounds like you've got more than your share of happiness,
Joel.
todd
|
1453.3 | and thank you very much | HKFINN::STANLEY | What a long strange trip it's been... | Fri Apr 12 1991 15:21 | 9 |
| *world peace
*freedom for all mankind
*a decent standard of living for all mankind
*a healthy and happy planet teaming with life
*new, creative and interestng things to do...like exploring reality and
the stars
mary stanley
|
1453.4 | | TRCO01::FINNEY | Keep cool, but do not freeze | Fri Apr 12 1991 18:47 | 3 |
| ... finishing this device driver on schedule ...
Scooter
|
1453.5 | | RIPPLE::GRANT_JO | lifted waters walk and leap | Fri Apr 12 1991 18:56 | 8 |
| re: .2 (Todd)
I should have said: when I'm not at work! ;^)
Now does anyone have any idea what is going on?
Joel
|
1453.6 | ??????? | COMET::ESTLICK | I AM, THEREFORE I THINK I AM | Fri Apr 12 1991 22:55 | 7 |
|
RE .0
To be wealthy, healthy and wise ? ;-)
Mike
|
1453.7 | Becoming dis-illusioned | ESSB::BROCKLEBANK | Looking at/for the more subtle things | Mon Apr 15 1991 09:48 | 13 |
| Re 5
I'd like to know whats hoing on too! When I saw the original
preceeding note I thought "Oh no!, .........". Anyhow if
Spence_g doesn't make us happy by speaking plain english I'll
make a guess and finish in the dots above.
Hopefully its just some joke that we havn't understood yet.
As far as my intuition tells me, no genuine offer of help is
worded as in the opening note(s).
Dave
|
1453.8 | 'I am He who has come' ? | DWOVAX::STARK | Boldly into the meaningless | Mon Apr 15 1991 12:57 | 13 |
| re: .0,
> Last offer over,
>
> I am here without boundaries. I am here to help you. What would make
> you happy.
Seriously, if this is not a joke or a cute point of some kind, then it
appears that it might be a theistic delusion. Not uncommon, and
usually treatable. Have you tried TERZA::PSYCHOLOGY for other
opinions ?
todd
|
1453.9 | ????? | RAVEN1::PINION | Hard Drinking Calypso Poet | Tue Apr 16 1991 04:55 | 10 |
| Curiosity got to me and....
Node: Ships is @ location SBP
There is no Spence_G in the Spence's in ELF, but there is one very good
possibility. I won't put that person name in here because I'm not
sure.
Spence_G, what's the deal? I saw the note in UFO's also.
Capt. Scott
|
1453.10 | | ENABLE::GLANTZ | Mike 227-4299 DECtp TAY Littleton MA | Tue Apr 16 1991 09:32 | 1 |
| Is everyone in this conference too young or too old to recognize LSD?
|
1453.11 | Maybe no joke | SHALOT::LACKEY | Birth...the leading cause of death | Tue Apr 16 1991 09:54 | 13 |
|
> I am here without boundaries. I am here to help you. What would make
> you happy.
Hmmm... Did you ever think that maybe it's neither a joke nor LSD?
Sounds like it could be a UNIX marketing manager who happened into the
wrong conference.
...just kidding; couldn't resist. :-)
Jeff
|
1453.12 | I hate that little flap of skin after biting my cheek | MISERY::WARD_FR | Going HOME---as an Adventurer! | Tue Apr 16 1991 11:45 | 18 |
| re: .11 (Jeff)
I don't know if *what* would make me happy or hoppy
or not. What is a *what*?
> . What would make you happy.
This does not say "What would make you happy?" Rather it
STATES that "What would make you happy." Therefore I am led to
believe that I should have some WHAT in my life. Is this person
giving "WHAT"s out? If so, should I take one?
Life is full of these wonderful onederful gem-quality little
itty bitty bitesized morsels or moronic information. Ain't life
just the grandest little 'ol thing?
Frederick
;-)
|
1453.13 | there is my shot | KAOFS::J_GREGOIRE | | Tue Apr 16 1991 12:06 | 4 |
|
Well for me " WHAT " would make me happy will be to
stop been afraid.
|
1453.14 | fear, Gracie ? | DWOVAX::STARK | Boldly into the meaningless | Tue Apr 16 1991 13:08 | 5 |
| re: .13, re: afraid,
Well, at least this seems to hold more promise than the base note.
Is this general anxiety, or a specific fear you might be looking for
help in facing ?
todd
|
1453.15 | | KAOFS::J_GREGOIRE | | Tue Apr 16 1991 17:07 | 7 |
|
ref:14
NO just fear!
just imagine what you could do in in life without
having fear of any kind.
|
1453.16 | fear not | DWOVAX::STARK | Boldly into the meaningless | Tue Apr 16 1991 17:27 | 15 |
| re: .15,
> just imagine what you could do in in life without
> having fear of any kind.
I could get myself into a whole peck of trouble, or fun, or
both. Some days, I probably wouldn't wanna do anything at all.
Some of my fear seems to keep me from doing dangerous
things, or motivates me to do useful things. If I got rid of it, I'd
sure have to become a whole lot more discriminating about where I
stuck my nose and so on, but I guess it could work. Just for fun,
got a suggestion on how to eliminate fear from the human experience ?
todd
|
1453.17 | fear | KAOFS::J_GREGOIRE | | Tue Apr 16 1991 17:50 | 10 |
|
REF:16
I guest you are right about getting in trouble but also
imagine all the time you wanted do something but was too
afraid to do it, so i think if i put wisdom with not having
fear of any kind that should be the right combination.
Jean.
|
1453.18 | A few pointers | CGVAX2::PAINTER | And on Earth, cooperation... | Tue Apr 16 1991 18:02 | 12 |
|
There is a wonderful book out entitled:
"Love Is Letting Go Of Fear", by Gerald Jambolsky
(think his last name is spelled relatively correctly).
It has helped me on many occasions.
Then there's the Biblical quote, "Perfect love casteth out fear."
Cindy
|
1453.19 | The ramblings explained - by the author | SHIPS::SPENCE_G | If time catches us up, why run away? | Wed Apr 17 1991 06:37 | 70 |
| Thank you all for your responses to my notes of last Thursday night.
I do owe you an explantion. Bear with me, it's not easy.
Thursday night saw the end of a 23 hour day working in information
analysis I had been doing for a Customer. It was not the first long
day in the past few weeks. The problems in the analysis had been
deepening in complexity and importance. The situation was compounded by
personal issues and concerns that had been plaguing me for some two
months. Closing in to midnight something happened that I find difficult
to explain ... but I will try.
It may have been lack of sleep, it may have been pressures, stress,
whatever but I reached a point where I felt the loneliest, most "hard
done by" individual anywhere. I forgot the plight of others far worse
off or less fortunate than myself and compressed thinking into a small
churning ball of self pity.
I slumped back in my chair and staring at the terminal sighed to my
self: "What to do? I can't get to the bottom of this." and then I sat
in silence.
Everything was quite at that time of night and all I could send, if
anything, was a shallow rushing sound in my ears; half way between wind
and water movement with a ringing modality to it. Then my thoughts went
something like:
"What is never spoken may not be heard. What is never asked for may not
be received."
I had been reading DEJAVU and UFO new notes earlier in the day and
thought of them though no topic in particular. Feelings and thoughts
rushed through my mind with no structure or form although certainly not
ones of self pity or sadness, more of creativity and release. A very,
very strange feeling.
"Write a note." I thought "Whatever, about anything; it doesn't matter.
It will help. Someone may help. Write about nothing but whats on your
mind, the confusion you feel. Write whats appropriate, what takes your
fancy."
So I did, three times! I felt the first was not enough, there was more.
So I dumped more and felt an increasing release and freedom from
pressures which earlier had seemed so heavy.
I have noted only once before in a small private conference on a
training course. I have been read only for some time in key notes of
interest such as DEJAVU and have taken great comfort in the free giving
of information and ideas. This then was to be the vehicle for my
assistance. An ashamedly selfish act.
To those who were frustrated by my ramblings, I apologise.
For those who were concerned, offered help or curiousity; I thank you
and I hope I have clarified things.
To whoever did whatever on Sunday afternoon around 14:00 Hrs UK time;
abundant thanks. My personal dilema is resolved, I bit the bullet I
had been rejecting for so long.
I am sorry it has taken so long to reply, I have only just plucked up
the courage to do so but felt I owed you an explanation.
Love yourself and a quiet mind,
Grahame
Oh, to those still curious, the words really do mean something to me.
Just not in that order or in the same context as each other!
|
1453.20 | | ENABLE::GLANTZ | Mike 227-4299 DECtp TAY Littleton MA | Wed Apr 17 1991 09:49 | 19 |
| For those interested in the conventional analysis of this experience,
it would probably be described as an isolated psychotic episode. These
can be fantastically healthy and constructive for relieving stress (as
Grahame demonstrated), and, in most people, occur only occasionally.
They're scary, both for the person and for observers, but are normal
and ok.
On the other hand, they can also be precipitated by hallucinogenic
drugs, and when intentionally induced in an excessive pattern, can
lead to deeper problems. In isolation, the episodes induced by drugs
are indistinguishable from the naturally occurring ones. At one time,
researchers (such as Timothy Leary in his respectable days) hoped that
these drugs would provide powerful insights into the workings of the
mind, and might offer clues to the cure of chronic psychosis and other
disorders. They might have been right, but we'll have to wait until we
emerge from the "dark ages" of drug-abuse paranoia to find out.
Thanks for the explanation, Grahame, and glad to hear your "in good
spirits" :-).
|
1453.21 | healthy psychosis sounds funny, huh ? | DWOVAX::STARK | Boldly into the meaningless | Wed Apr 17 1991 10:20 | 17 |
| re: .19, .20,
Thanks for the explanation, Grahame. I hope everything
is going well for you. As far as *I'm* concerned, your
rationale is completely understandable. I'm glad you entered
those Notes. I think it's important to have comment's like Mike's,
too, to help balance your perspective and evaluate the meaning
of your experience.
re: fear,
Isn't there a distinction between feeling fear and acting on it ?
Are we talking about not feeling fear, or feeling it but acting
on other kinds of feelings ? The latter seems more likely to
be something we can do NOW, the former something that would take
a lifetime of facing and defeating personal demons to do. Maybe
both are valuable ?
todd
|
1453.22 | got a bad cold today ... | ENABLE::GLANTZ | Mike 227-4299 DECtp TAY Littleton MA | Wed Apr 17 1991 10:57 | 21 |
| > <<< Note 1453.21 by DWOVAX::STARK "Boldly into the meaningless" >>>
> -< healthy psychosis sounds funny, huh ? >-
Interesting point, but an important one! A lot of what increases the
frustration (beyond what we already have to deal with) of people who
experience literally ANYTHING out of the completely ordinary "normal"
realm of experience is that they're told that they're "sick" or
"crazy" (or "possessed"?).
Isolated incidents are not only normal, but probably essential to
survival! I get a little worried about people who lead apparently
model lives, with no evidence of even the slightest aberration. No
depression, no neurosis, no psychosis, no anxiety. Perfectly healthy
little specimens. Do you believe it?
It's a big problem that we're just not allowed to show any signs of
mental weakness. "Career limiting move", you know. You can have a
wicked flu and be out of work for a week and a half, but try taking a
"mental health" day and see what happens.
Oh well. I guess we know what's gonna happen at MY next review :-).
|
1453.23 | Over-responding to single data points. | DWOVAX::STARK | Boldly into the meaningless | Wed Apr 17 1991 13:31 | 11 |
| re: .22,
Thanks, Mike. I've been thinking about that a lot myself,
and that helped put some things into perspective. I tend to
make rigid rules about things, and then expect not only
me but everyone else to adhere to them. A little break
from our own standards of behavior seems well justified at times.
Otherwise, It's too easy to attach some kind of negative
connotation or even mystical significance to an isolated incident, and
just create a new unfounded rule. I know I tend to do that at times.
todd
|
1453.24 | Reply | CGVAX2::PAINTER | And on Earth, cooperation... | Wed Apr 17 1991 13:53 | 28 |
|
Hi Grahame,
Welcome! I was actually reading something similar to this a few months
ago in a book by E.J. Gold and using the human body for transformation
(or some such thing). The book belonged to a friend of mine, so I
can't look it up, however there was a story of a woman who experienced
something like what you described - overwork, stress, etc. She called
it "approaching her chronic", and that's when she can truly
breakthrough to new levels of consciousness - when she can recognize it
and witness it instead of simply being caught up in it. ???
The other thing I read recently, hanging on the outside of a friend's
cubicle was this article entitled:
"Writing It Out is Good Therapy, Studies Show" (NY Times, 3/26/91)
A few excerpted sentences:
"New studies suggest that people who are able to write about their
inner thoughts and feelings may enjoy better mental and physical
health. ... It reduces the physical and mental stress involved
in inhibiting thoughts, "Pennebaker said. But more importantly
writing is a powerful tool to organize overwhelming events and make
them manageable. The mind torments itself by thinking about
unresolved issues." ...
Cindy
|
1453.25 | On the threshold of a dream.... | IJSAPL::ELSENAAR | Fractal of the universe | Wed Apr 17 1991 15:35 | 6 |
|
Congrats, Grahame!
And thanks for writing it here.
Arie
|
1453.26 | You are write | SHIPS::SPENCE_G | If time catches us up, why run away? | Wed Apr 17 1991 16:51 | 21 |
| Re: 24
Cindy,
Has anyone told you how nice it is the way you 'welcome' people. Makes
me feel very comfortable.
The research you mention is substanciated by my experience in two ways.
The earlier one was a release, a letting go and it's own way very
fulfilling.
Writing about the experience was theraputic itself. My thoughts were
around couching the words in terms that would 'bring to life' the
experience in terms that people would understand. In so doing, I
re-evaulated and analysed what had happened to my satisfaction. Before
writing the note, during the 'no! I can't' phase I still had a great
deal of confusion and disbelief.
Writing it down (better, writing it down for others) works for me.
Grahame
|
1453.27 | | RAVEN1::PINION | Hard Drinking Calypso Poet | Thu Apr 18 1991 03:49 | 7 |
| Hi Graeham,
Congratulations...sounds as if you have had a transforming
experience. I can relate... Altraea, you got anything interesting to
add to this? Peace, y'all.
Capt. Scott
|
1453.28 | Better late than never | ESSB::BROCKLEBANK | Looking at/for the more subtle things | Thu Apr 18 1991 06:43 | 40 |
| Hi Grahame,
I guess it took some courage to write in your explanation yesterday....
congrats! I must admit that my initial reaction was that the original
note was trying to deceive. On seeing your explanation I realize that
it was written in a fairly stressed condition. Probably the most
important thing is that you tried to put your feelings & confusion
into writing. I'v always found this experience 'magical' as it can
transform confused emotional mis-mash of thoughts and feelings into
someting concrete which doesn't twist and turn when trying to graple
with it. Then the situation usually becomes clearer and ofter
an over generalisation or exageration is seen in the logic being
thought.
When the situation is completely behind you I'd be very interested
to know what you meant in note 1452 no matter how imaginative it
was. However if you'd rather not I understand your feelings. Anyhow
welcome again.
Re Mike
Yes I also agree with an openness which would bring about the end
of the dark ages of drug paranoia.
Re Other notes on fear
To give my tuppence worth on fear...... I don't anyone should try
to eliminate fear. Its an extreemely important emotion which has
enabled us (and the other feeling animals) to survive so long.
I think that the point of view which advocates its elimination comes
from an extension of the western world view to 'be happy and not
suffer and only have a good time' (hope this sounded cynical enough!)
Fear is a real emotion and as such very much part of ourselves and
our experience.
However sometimes fear gets out of hand and is applied to (or evoked
by) inappropriate situations. This is where the problem is. To
identify in-appropriate fears and to eliminate those by whatever means
one chooses.
Time to stop rambling and get back to earning bread...
Dave
|
1453.29 | Congratulations on making contact! | ASDS::ATKINSON | | Fri Apr 19 1991 16:03 | 28 |
| Re: .19
Good afternoon Grahame,
For your edification, the sound of rushing wind and water was direct contact
with your causal body(your I AM Presence, aka your piece of divinity)
...which sent you the message "What is never spoken may not be heard.
What is never asked for may not be received."
In simplicity it communicated to you that you are in a free will area of this
universe and if you don't ask for help you can never receive it....the Master
Jesus said it simply "ask and ye shall receive". All the great beings
of light, including your own I AM presence (your piece of divinity) is always
ready and willing to help you with whatever, but since you live in a free will
universe you "must ask" for this help and assistance or they are unable to
interfere in your reality in any shape, way or form.
Congratulations on making contact! and a hearty welcome to this conference
and Earth's acceleration into light.
With Love and Light
I AM
Talligai (aka Altraea)
P.S. Next time you need assistance you won't have to wait till you get to
melt down..there are much easier ways of contacting your presence..happy
creating!
|
1453.30 | Taking the contact further | SHIPS::SPENCE_G | If time catches us up, why run away? | Mon Apr 22 1991 08:07 | 24 |
| Re: .29
Talligai,
Thanks for entering the explanation of direct contact with my causal
body and for your welcome, it is much appreciated.
It was a strange yet satisfying experience and couching it in terms of
"contact" and "help", that was exactly what the experience turned out
to be. It is very supportive to be able to recognise that I don't
always need to turn to others for help, I have a source within me.
I can see tremendous opportunities in the exploration of contact with
my I AM presence and would appreciate you expanding on your PS "..there
are much easier ways of contacting your presence..happy creating". I
don't want to go through the painful precursers of a week and a half
ago!
I look forward to your guidance.
A little flame, getting brighter (I think). :-)
Grahame
|
1453.31 | Introducing "Beloved I AM"! | ASDS::ATKINSON | | Wed Apr 24 1991 11:50 | 31 |
| Re:.30
You are very welcome, Grahame.
Here is a descriptive and easy method of contact with your presence.
Your I AM presence (or light body) is a blazing rainbow of light. When
you arise and get in the shower (if that is your a.m. routine) visualize
in your mind's eye yourself above you enveloped in this blazing rainbow
of light...stretch your physical arms up over your head and visualize
your presence stretching it's arms down to meet yours....clasp hands
with your presence and draw it to yourself asking it: "Beloved presence
draw near me, envelope me and guide me for this 24hour period". Feel the
mergence, the surge of energy and wellbeing that come over you.
You can do this without the shower, however, the shower cleans and recharges
your auric field helping facilitate the process as a result. (Any swiftly
moving water does this, it is why we feel rejuvenated in its presence...
ie: showers, water falls, ocean, etc.)
Happy creating a new reality and I will be interested to know how you make
out.
Remember, this is your eternal internal source of love, friendship, energy,
manifestation...etc. Your personal piece of DIVINITY. The real you!
In Light and Love,
I AM
Talligai
|
1453.32 | neat | ENABLE::GLANTZ | Mike 227-4299 DECtp TAY Littleton MA | Wed Apr 24 1991 13:20 | 2 |
| Talligai, is this method specifically for Grahame? Will it work
equally well for others (such as me)?
|
1453.33 | Your I AM Presence Awaits Thee! | ASDS::ATKINSON | | Wed Apr 24 1991 15:52 | 11 |
| Re:.32
Good afternoon Mike,
It will work for everyone that is interested enough and enthusiastic enough
to try it with a sincere heart.
I'm sure that applies to you!
Namasthe,
Talligai
|
1453.34 | more questions | ENABLE::GLANTZ | Mike 227-4299 DECtp TAY Littleton MA | Wed Apr 24 1991 17:16 | 26 |
| Actually, I asked partly because some of the most gentle, useful
insights come to me during morning washing-up-for-work, so your method
seemed particularly coincidental. But sometimes (not as often),
similar thoughts also come in the evening. Do you have any evening
exercises which would benefit these moments?
Also one other interesting sensation (if you could call it that) I
hope you might be able to comment on (or maybe it's just an "ordinary
emotion"): sometimes, when another person in the room is demonstrating
or showing me something in a relaxed context or complete trust (i.e.,
they don't feel that they're being evaluated or judged), I experience
a strong, clear feeling of peace and relaxation, almost as if that
person's sense of ease is being transmitted to me. It used to happen
fairly regularly when a particular high school friend (male) played
some simple tune for me on a piano (always that particular tune), and
now it happens with almost perfect reliability when my older daughter
does any sort of pretend play in front of me (such as having a tea
party for her dolls). It doesn't happen when my younger daughter does
it! I used to not pay much attention to it (though always noticed it),
but since it's so strong and repeatable with my daughter, I've been
wondering a bit about it. Have you got any thoughts or comments on
this? Has anyone else had similar sensations? Is it in some way
similar to the contacting of one's presence, only contacting the other
person's presence?
Thanks very much for any thoughts on this.
|
1453.35 | EMPATHY? | DNEAST::BERLINGER_MA | LIFE IN THE ASTRAL PLANE | Thu Apr 25 1991 13:03 | 15 |
|
re.34
When the sensation you describe happens to me I tend
to call it empathy- EMotional telePATHY. The key point, for me, is that
were it not for the other person, place, thing, situation I probably
would not be feeling that way.
I.M.H.O.
Later,
Mark
|
1453.36 | WOW! Thanks, Mark! Excellent insight. | CGVAX2::PAINTER | give the world laughter | Thu Apr 25 1991 14:13 | 1 |
|
|
1453.37 | reminds me of the secret life of plants | DWOVAX::STARK | Caution: easily confused | Thu Apr 25 1991 15:03 | 8 |
| re: Mark,
Yeah, that was interesting. Kinda reminds me of that
infamous research some folks did a while back to try to determine
how people's emotional states affected plants. I'm not sure
whatever became of that (invalidated, followed-up, reinterpreted,
?).
todd
|
1453.38 | LOVE is GRAND | ASDS::ATKINSON | | Thu Apr 25 1991 16:57 | 16 |
|
Re: .34
Mark,
You are experiencing an expansion of the heart chakra and the figure
eight flow and exchange of love energy (unconditional love) through
the heart. It is a most remarkable sensation. You can experience this
with persons of either sex since there are no sexual overtones or
connotations attached to this emotion....this is what unconditional
love feels like.
Congratulations Mark!
Namasthe,
Talligai
|
1453.39 | | DSSDEV::GRIFFIN | Throw the gnome at it | Thu Apr 25 1991 18:59 | 14 |
|
Mark,
Odds are, that if you are capable of feeling the "good" emotions of people,
you can feel the "bad" from people as well. I don't know about chakra and
stuff, but it is a neat feeling when the flow of good feelings becomes a
feedback between you and the other person.
You may not feel things from the younger child for several reasons: she
doesn't enjoy pretend tea parties as much, or she has natural "barriers"
against people reading her (or from projecting her own feelings). Or maybe
you are still learning how to read her?
Beth
|
1453.40 | | ENABLE::GLANTZ | Mike 227-4299 DECtp TAY Littleton MA | Fri Apr 26 1991 11:19 | 37 |
| > <<< Note 1453.39 by DSSDEV::GRIFFIN "Throw the gnome at it" >>>
>Mark,
Oops, sounds like you're talking about me, Mike. No matter. I've been
called worse :-).
It's a puzzling thing, all right, because I can, at times, reproduce
this peaceful sensation while alone, by recalling a previous time
during which I felt it. Not as strong, though. I use it sometimes to
get some perspective in the middle of a hectic work day.
As to why it happens only with the older daughter, and not the
younger, I was able to feel it very strongly with the older from when
she was younger then the little one is now, so I don't think it's a
question of age or learning. They have much different personalities,
and the older one is definitely more analytical -- she inspects and
thinks about things intensely -- similar to myself. The little one is
much less so, and generally has a less intellectual personality. She
doesn't engage in as as much "thought-play" as the older one. She's
more inclined to have "direct", active experiences.
As far as feeling the bad emotions of other people, as well as the
good, that may be true, but if it is, the effect is such that I feel
badly, too, and rather than become consciously aware of it, I just
experience it and become unpleasant. One thing I've noticed: when I'm
in a *really* lousy mood (like, because something's going wrong on a
project at work), a *lot* of things and people around be seem to go
wrong, sort of like my bad mood spreads to them. So it's hard to say
(and I somehow doubt it matters) whether the emotion spreads from one
person to another, and in which direction, or whether it sort of just
occurs like a "field" in several people and things at the same time,
maybe stronger in some places or people than others.
By the way, I tried the shower exercise yesterday morning, but the
kids were screaming in the bathroom (beating each other up), so was a
little too distracted to be aware of anything. This morning, I didn't
remember to try.
|
1453.41 | I feel the need to explain | DNEAST::BERLINGER_MA | LIFE IN THE ASTRAL PLANE | Fri Apr 26 1991 13:49 | 40 |
| re. 37
Todd,
I remember a "cult" movie called _The_Secret_Life
_of_Plants. It was about a guy in a florists shop. He planted an
alien seed which sprouted and grew into a flesh eater. At first the
plant was content with the owners own blood. The plot thickens when
the plant developes a voice and *demands* that the man bring it
"*More*". .....I also rember the study you spoke of and also cannot
remember what the conclution was.
re. .36, .38
Cindy, Talligai,
Thank you for the kind words. My most
vivid recolection of an empathetic reaction was once when in high
school. I was in the audience watching the senior play (a musical)
the leading man began a song. Less than half way through his voice
cracked and went flat. (In the true spirit of show business) He
finished the song way off key. I sat in my seat and died of embar-
esment for him. I'm not sure if this is a good thing or a good way
for me to be in the normal course of things. I'm not certain that
I've yet explained myself fully/properly so I'll continue. When I
said "...were it not for the other person, thing, situation I might
not feel...." I was describing a lack of personal boundry. That is to
say that upon examination it is not clear if I am *me* feeling this or
if I am the other person, thing, .... feeling this; and if I *am me*
feeling this would I still feel this were it not for the other person,
place, thing, situation? In and of itself empathy is neither good nor
bad. When it is not clear to me whoes feelings I am experiencing then
I have to stop and take an emotional/mental inventory (whats mine whats
not mine and what do I do with each). The times when empathy is im-
portant to me is during a heart to heart conversation and when reading
tarot.
I hope I have not muddied the waters.
Later,
Mark
|
1453.42 | Are you sure about that movie? | ATSE::WAJENBERG | | Fri Apr 26 1991 14:16 | 5 |
| Re .41
The movie you describe wounds like "Little Shop of Horrors."
Earl Wajenberg
|
1453.43 | Secret Life of the Little Shop | CADSYS::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Fri Apr 26 1991 17:05 | 52 |
| RE: Secret life of plants.
I agree, this sounds like "Little Shop of Horrors". This is a great
"bad" film. It was produced by Roger Corman -- the king of the low
budget horror movies. It was quite literally made in the evenings
while another film was being made, so as not to "waste" the rental of
the film production equipment. Some people who see it consider it
simply a poor, cheap film. Others, myself included, see it as a
wonderful spoof of cheap horror films. That it was itself what it was
spoofing -- that it was a *self* parody -- helps rather than hinders
its quality as a spoof. Among other items of note, this film was one
of the first appearances of Jack Nicholson (he plays Wilber Force, the
pain junkie).
A few years ago, a broadway musical was based on this film. It was
turned into a successful film, starring Rick Morraines (sp?) and a
marvelous piece of Jim Henson wizardry, with Steve Martin in a
supporting role. As good a film as it is, the large budget, slick
production loses some of the sense of "gritty unreality" of the
original. I recommend both films independently (it would be
interesting to see them back-to-back: I believe that they are both
available on videotape -- I've seen the original retailing for $4).
It is possible that there was a release of the original "Little Shop"
as "The Secret Life of Plants", though I don't know of it. In that
case, it was (re)titled after a best selling "non-fiction" book.
That book covered a lot of subjects, but especially the work by
polygraph "expert" Cleve Backster, which is almost certainly what todd
was referring to in .37. Backster, who is still at it in his own lab
in San Diego, hooks a polygraph up to a plant and then thinks nasty
or nice thoughts at the plant. Supposedly he gets correlations.
The parapsychological literature contains a number of analyses, and
attempted replications. The "Backster Effect" is shown as conclusively
as can be done to be due to serious flaws in Backster's methods. When
those flaws are included apparent (but spurious) replication of his
results occur. When they are eliminated the effect vanishes. If there
is a Backster Effect, Backster has never demonstrated it.
Unfortunately, Ray Hyman, in his report for the NRC on parapsychology,
used Backster's lab to good effect in his campaign against
parapsychology. He included Backster's lab amoung those
"parapsychology" labs which he analyzed. Of course, he ripped it to
shreds, leaving the impression that this was somehow representative of
the state of parapsychological research. Needless to say, there is no
mention that the literature of parapsychology is universally critical
of Backster's work, and no citation of any of those negative
parapsychological reviews, though he is most certainly knowledgable
enough with the literature to be aware of them.
Topher
|
1453.44 | | RIPPLE::GRANT_JO | lifted waters walk and leap | Fri Apr 26 1991 17:16 | 13 |
| re: .43 (Topher)
Well, that just does it! I'm taking my Ray Hyman collection
and feeding it to a man-eating plant! ;^)
More seriously, I was interested to read that there was an
older, "grittier" version of "Little Shop." I liked the
Rick Moranis/Steve Martin one and I usually don't care
to much for movies. Wonder if the older version is generally
available on videotape?
Joel
|
1453.45 | maybe closing this rathole ... | LESCOM::KALLIS | Pumpkins -- Nature's greatest gift. | Fri Apr 26 1991 17:27 | 8 |
| Re .44 (Joel):
The original can be found in EP mode (the slowest/cheapest) in the
"audio/video" departments of larger chain stores and some dime stores
(what a misnomer these days!!) for as little as $5.00 new. I think
there may even be a colorized version.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
1453.46 | | DSSDEV::GRIFFIN | Throw the gnome at it | Fri Apr 26 1991 17:56 | 15 |
|
Re: .41 Personal boundaries (or the lack there of): Seems to be a common
problem for sensitive empaths - I grew up having feelings I usually couldn't
explain, and didn't really learn how to seperate *them* from me until I was
in my mid-20s. (Others don't necessarily take that long to figure it out, but
I grew up with parents who may not know it but are sensitive, and protected
me and my sisters extremely well - I lived with their defenses until I moved
out on my own, and didn't even know I was using their shields)
With "practice", you learn to detect sources very easily, however, that doesn't
seem to prevent the extreme emotions from taking you over anyway (you can
only filter out so much input, and with the "volume" cranked up, you "hear" it
anyway).
Beth
|
1453.47 | Thoughts on boundaries | CGVAX2::PAINTER | give the world laughter | Sun Apr 28 1991 22:38 | 40 |
|
Re: boundaries
I've had problems with this one too. I grew up in a house where
personal boundaries weren't exactly allowed (rather, we were told what
to think and how we were feeling vs. being allowed to express our
thoughts and feelings freely). Most sensitive empaths that I've met
have come from this kind of a background as well. Or, the opposite is
true - the others coming from this background have almost *no* ability
to empathize at all. (The first group falls typically in the 'victim'
category, with the others falling in the 'aggressor' category. If
John Bradshaw is correct (see the Adult Children topic in this file),
the majority of the population falls within the unhealthy boundary
sector.
I believe there are healthy and unhealthy empath experiences, and this
correlates directly with the amount of ego boundary we each managed (or
were allowed to) build up in the transition from childhood to
adulthood. If our ego boundaries aren't established, then there is no
line and we 'become' the other person we are empathizing with
(unhealthy). Whereas if we establish the boundaries, then we can
consciously choose to go beyond them to reach to the 'other', yet
remain within our self enough to view the entire process from a detached
witness state (healthy).
Though I'm quite a few years into the process of forming and letting go
consciously of ego boundaries, it's still a struggle. There are lots
of people in the world who are most willing to take your power/energy,
and these are the people you have the most difficult time with when you
decide to claim your power for your own and create your own boundaries.
The key is to...
Know thyself. Ask the question of yourself, "Who am I?", and listen to
the quiet loving voice within you. Do this continuously. Once you
realize who you truly are, then there will be no problem distinguishing
between yourself and the other, and nobody will be able to claim your
power for their own again. Then you will truly be free.
Cindy
|
1453.48 | THE SECRET LIF OF PLANTS | SQM::HARQUAIL | Woof Woof! | Mon Apr 29 1991 08:57 | 8 |
|
In case anyones interested, I saw what looked like a new book, titled
The Secret Life of Plants, last week in the Booksmith on Boylston
street downtown Boston, I didn't really check ir out and don't
remember the author, I did notice it wasn't at the booksmith in the
nashua mall.
terry
|
1453.49 | Backster's stoic plants | DWOVAX::STARK | Caution: easily confused | Mon Apr 29 1991 10:51 | 11 |
| re: .43,
> polygraph "expert" Cleve Backster, which is almost certainly what todd
> was referring to in .37. Backster, who is still at it in his own lab
>... results occur. When they are eliminated the effect vanishes. If
> there is a Backster Effect, Backster has never demonstrated it.
Yes, that is the work to which I was referring. Thanks for the
reply.
todd
|
1453.50 | Talligai to Grahame, come in please... | ASDS::ATKINSON | | Mon Apr 29 1991 17:28 | 8 |
|
Bye the way, Grahame,
Have you had a chance to try out my little exercise? How did you make
out???
Namasthe,
Talligai
|
1453.51 | | DSSDEV::GRIFFIN | Throw the gnome at it | Tue Apr 30 1991 16:21 | 18 |
|
Re .47
Actually, my family was one of neither case you stated. I did learn a strong
sense of self, and was fairly indepedent of family opinions, however, I never
had to protect my self boundaries because my parents protected them (and did
NOT restrict them). I just didn't realize how much they did so until I went
away to college and had to start dealing with those people who try to force
their opinions upon you by strength of will alone, without the protections of
parents.
The ability to protect my boundaries has improved, but is still difficult from
time to time, especially if I become insecure about something. (My defense to
insecurity is to tell myself I can handle it anyway, and ignore the unfounded
fears - as recommended, always questioning why I feel something, is it really
me).
Beth
|
1453.52 | "Awakening" the chakras in the shower" | LASCPM::BARNETTE | Not Ready for Prime Time Noter | Fri May 24 1991 13:32 | 19 |
|
Another shower exercise. It helps if you have the kind of shower head
that can focus a fairly narrow beam of water on a specific region of
the body:
After getting used to the temperature of the water, turn your
back to the shower head. Position yourself so that the water
is aimed at the base of your spine, and visualize bright red
light emanating from the root chakra. The light expands out
to fill your body, then the shower stall, then the bathroom,
until everything within your range of perception is filled
with the red.
Move closer to the shower head. The water is now focused on the
next chakra (help me out here, I don't know the name of this
one, call it the "orange" chakra %^). LET THE LIGHT
|
1453.53 | continued | LASCPM::BARNETTE | Not Ready for Prime Time Noter | Fri May 24 1991 13:36 | 11 |
|
Sorry about the break-off in the last reply. I'm using the world's
worst terminal emulator.
Anyway, repeat the exercise, training the water on each chakra in turn.
Visualize the light expanding from each. When you emerge from the
shower, you will feel vibrant, balanced and centered.
Enjoy!
Neal/B
|