T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1377.1 | | BTOVT::BEST_G | you are living in eternal wind | Wed Oct 24 1990 10:58 | 12 |
| Part 1:
I'd say that just hearing what a psychic says is sometimes enough
to change the person's mind, and thus the outcome of the struggle.
Of course, it may be the opposite of what was predicted.
Part 2:
Synchronicity.....
guy
|
1377.2 | | BSS::VANFLEET | It's only life after all | Wed Oct 24 1990 13:59 | 4 |
| I agree with Guy. The future is always mutable and anything, including
a reading, could influence that future.
Nanci
|
1377.3 | RE: .1 & .2 | LACV01::USHER | | Wed Oct 24 1990 15:47 | 11 |
| I'm not sure I'm sure what .1 and .2 are saying. As the struggle is
not with the man and with woman, she isn't being influenced by the
reading. I guess what I'm asking is how does a reader go past the
struggle and say "yes, this is what I see happening but when there is
a struggle (free will?) she cant be sure. Maybe one of you
who "reads" can answer this. Maybe a general overview would help
me understand. Whats the point of a reading when everything can
change when you walk out the door. Is it just potential?
Curious and now confused
|
1377.4 | | BTOVT::BEST_G | you are living in eternal wind | Wed Oct 24 1990 16:25 | 20 |
|
re: .3
I see what you mean, since the man had the reading and not the woman,
but if these two are in a relationship, I take it they are having some
sort of contact, no?
How the man chooses to interact with the woman (based on what he was
told) could have an affect on her decision. Maybe he will try to help
her resolve her struggle, she will resent it want out. Or maybe he
will try to use her indecision to his advantage and try to sway her
one way or the other. Who knows?
I'd say that a reading IS potential, and not set in molybdenum(sp?).
I've certainly never had a reading that didn't end up being trashed
in one way or another. Some of them did open my eyes to some valuable
insights (though there was as much, if not more, useless stuff).
guy
|
1377.5 | Readings are useful as a self-evaluation. | MISERY::WARD_FR | Going HOME--as an Adventurer | Wed Oct 24 1990 17:58 | 30 |
| re: .3
What's the point of a reading? The point is that that is
where your energies are aligned at the time of the reading. If you
like the alignment, you do what you want to keep it in place.
If you don't like it, you do whatever it takes to change it.
One of the problems we all seem to have (until we think about
it for a while) is that we all want to believe that someone/something
knows everything and by virtue of that probably even sets things
up for us. ("It's God's will.") Wrong. As has been mentioned in
here in DEJAVU before, what's the point if there is such a thing as
predestination? I mean, really, if everything is already laid out
end to end, in concrete as it were, then why bother? No matter what
you do it'll always be right or it will always be wrong. No matter
what you have no power, no control, no influence and, of course,
zero responsibility. It's all a game and guess what, you lose!
Time is non-existant beyond the physical plane. All eternity
does exist. But within all possibility exists a tiny little speck
of a lifetime. A lifetime that can draw to it from the vastness of
eternity. A lifetime that can and does control all around it. A
lifetime that makes order out of the chaos. You are scriptwriter,
director, and featured star. Others can look at your "play" and
tell you what you've written, then it's up to you to decide whether
to keep it or alter it.
It isn't really such a big mystery. It's more like a big
decision.
Frederick
|
1377.6 | Foggy..... ;-) | IJSAPL::ELSENAAR | Fractal of the universe | Wed Oct 24 1990 18:10 | 13 |
| RE .3 ("Curious")
It's been explained to me that the future, in some cases is seen as a "fork
in the road". The reader can see the two (or even more...) "directions"; it
can even see what circumstances influence the future choice, but they cannot
"look beyond" because of a "fog" further on.
I would say most readers influence the future choice because of the
credibility they build up by telling the facts of the circumstances, and
then telling the most probable direction. The reader you mentioned in .0
appears to me as a very "honest" one.... ;-)
Arie
|
1377.7 | Thick as pea soup... :-) | BSS::VANFLEET | It's only life after all | Wed Oct 24 1990 18:50 | 11 |
| re: -1 (Arie)
That was my point exactly. The future is always mutable. There may be
any number of possible futures but what the reader usually picks up on
is the most likely of those probably futures. That's why I don't
usually read "futures" per se. I read where the person is right now,
where they are likely to go if they continue on the same course and
what tools they carry with them to use along the way as well as
possible stumbling blocks.
Nanci
|
1377.8 | | WILLEE::FRETTS | wooing of the wind.... | Thu Oct 25 1990 12:08 | 8 |
|
I agree with the last few. A person can be gifted to read the
"energies" of another to see past and present, and then is able
to see the "possible" futures that can be created. The choice
of just what that future is, is always left to the individual.
Carole
|
1377.9 | | ELWOOD::BATES | G-l-o-r-i-a | Mon Oct 29 1990 12:30 | 17 |
| From time to time I visit my friend Donna Caramello for a reading.
Each time, she says the same thing - "From where you are now, we're
looking at tendencies, probabilities, likelihoods. If you don't like
it, change it."
I've often considered her ability to be akin to that of, say, someone
who can perform incredibly complex mathematic calculations mentally, in
seconds. Rather, in seconds her mind defines the range of probabilities
radiating out from a point in time/space, determines the highest
probability path, and defines that one as the likelihood, for that
time. It's as Frederick says, but less clearly, perhaps.
What I'm at a loss to figure out is how she's able to tune into
specifics of my current reality at the same time, without my giving her
any overt verbal clues...
gloria
|
1377.10 | Question on methods | LACV01::USHER | | Mon Oct 29 1990 15:16 | 7 |
| Now that my curiousity is peaked, I have another question. Whats
the difference (if any) in a reader that is talking to "guides/spirits"
and one who is going by their own psychic ability. Is one known
to be more accurate then the other. In my reading, she would ask
questions of "them" as she put it and then extrapalate from what
they told her. She also used I feels, like she was using her own
ability. Any claifications.
|
1377.11 | clarification hopefully | CARTUN::BERGGREN | Go now and do heart work... | Mon Oct 29 1990 15:58 | 33 |
| .10,
The difference is this. When a reader makes a direct link to the
sitter and acquires information that way the reader is using their own
"psychic" abilities:
Reader <-----------------> Sitter
When the reader goes to a guide or someone else in spirit, the one in
spirit is the one who establishes a psychic link with the sitter, if
you will, and the reader then acts as a medium (or channeler if you
prefer) and directs his/her consciousness to the person in spirit for
the information:
Spirit person
/ \
/ \
/ \
/ \
/ \
Medium/Channel Sitter
Ocassionally during this type of sitting, the medium also links
directly with the sitter and receives information psychically. It is
not unusually for the medium to go back and forth between both ways of
receiving information. But a knowledgeable medium and one who works
with integrity, will be aware when they are making this shift, and imo,
will inform the sitter.
I hope this is helpful.
Karen
|
1377.12 | Work with it...evaluate...build a rapport and trust | MISERY::WARD_FR | Going HOME--as an Adventurer | Mon Oct 29 1990 16:12 | 47 |
| re: .10
That's a good question with possibly complex answers...
but if I can I will answer from where I presently stand. Which
is to say that you are coming from within no matter what...but
what is within? It depends...it depends on the level you are accessing.
One can access their own intelligence, e.g. strictly from
a conscious mind (and in saying it was from some other place would
therefore clearly be lying.) Or, one could access their sub-conscious
mind, which is reliant on information from this lifetime (also
intelligence) or from our own personal heritage or ancestry (this
is *NOT* from all those who are the same race...this is from the
heritage of the lifetimes that relate to this one...that is, this
may be the first lifetime as a Chinese and that person's heritage
may very well be Atlantean or African or European...heritage is
NOT limited to whatever this lifetime is.) Now, if from heritage
and sub-conscious, the information can come from those individuals
within that heritage whom you have access to...teachers, shamans,
etc. If from the unconscious mind, however, the information if
virtually endless in possibility. The information could be provided
from masses of sources, including archetypal energies, beings from
other realities, etc. If the information somehow comes from other
realities, then it has a different perspective than information
coming from within this reality.
Which is better and why? Astral level (the realm of probability)
energies can vary in "wisdom." Some are lousy and some are very
good. Causal level (realm of all possibilities) energies are far
more valuable, mental level (all that is impossible) energies are
not likely to be grokked. That is, their awareness is more than we
can handle, so information may be dependent on your willingness to
absorb? Information from beyond those levels is unlikely...the only
one I will vouch for is Lazaris.
(Is Lazaris psychic? The most! Just yesterday I became aware
of a couple of people who approached him during what is called "the
crystal ceremony" and he addressed them by name before they even
touched or greeted him with their own name...try this sometime with
*your* eyes shut and see how far you get in a room of 400 people...
:-) )
Anyway, I'm not sure how accurate what I'm saying is...what I
can say, however, is that there are many possible sources within.
WHich is better seems to me to depend on the level of communication
and trust which has been established within there. As for dealing
with someone else's "insights" (not from you but from them) I
believe it is a matter of just as much if not more, trust.
Frederick
|
1377.13 | Not a good experience | BPOV02::BRACCIALE | | Tue Nov 27 1990 11:16 | 28 |
1377.14 | RE: .13 | LACV01::USHER | | Tue Nov 27 1990 15:19 | 8 |
| I am familiar with her shop and have seen her on numerous TV programs
when I lived in Mass. Did you know of anyone that had seen her and
was pleased with her reading? $75 for 1/2 hour is pretty steep. The
woman I went to is by donation only. When she read you did you tell
her she was off base? Sometimes I have noticed that they are very
general with what they tell you and you could apply it to almost
anything ... or was she just completly wrong.
|
1377.15 | explanation | LESCOM::KALLIS | Pumpkins -- Nature's greatest gift. | Wed Nov 28 1990 08:10 | 8 |
| Set mode=moderator.
I've set .13 hidden. It may violate policy about
commenting on unsatisfactory business service.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
1377.16 | My experience | SUBURB::PARKERA | The cabbage killer | Fri Dec 07 1990 09:35 | 31 |
| After reading through some of the notes in this conference I thought
this may be the best topic to reply to....
I have regular 'readings' usually while attending a 'psychic fair',
when seeing different people using a variety of methods you realise
that some of them are excellent while others very poor.
My best readings have come from a lady who was psychic and who was very
talented in tarot cards and rune readings. Her past, present and future
predictions were unbelievably accurate.
Another lady I saw had contact with a spirit who would answer questions
she put forward for you, her answers came in the form of writing
backwards or drawing diagrams. Again this was very accurate, plus it
was possible to retain the writing and read it for yourself while looking
in a mirror.
But I have also had bad readers, who were obviously just trying to make
money.
I agree with what was said before, about readings for the future,
allowing the individual to change what has been told if they so wish.
By the way, my name's Angela, working in Reading England. I beleive in
'fortune tellers' and am myself 'psychic' to a degree. I can predict
through dreams various actions that will take place in the near future,
and also have an interest in tarot cards, palmistry and healing by
means of gem stones.
Ang.
|