T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1176.1 | konifer killing | BTOVT::BEST_G | in the available light | Tue Dec 05 1989 13:05 | 3 |
|
I'm going to make a ritual sacrifice out of it.....;-)
|
1176.2 | artificial has advantages | LESCOM::KALLIS | Efts have feelings, too. | Tue Dec 05 1989 14:13 | 13 |
| Re .0 (Mikie?):
Some years ago, my wife and I decided to get an artificial tree.
We haver a beauty -- Looks nearly real (with lights, etc. on it,
even more so).
Cost == $125.00
Amortized over a decade, $12.50 per year.
Better than killing real trees, and more cost-effective.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
1176.3 | Warm Winter Solstice Wishes! | SMD72J::VEACH | SEA WITCH | Tue Dec 05 1989 14:42 | 10 |
| If one must have a real (as opposed to artificial) evergreen tree for
the festivities, live trees are a good alternative to slain trees.
They provide the same visual and olfactory stimulus as their dead
counterparts and can be replanted afterward.
Happy Yule,
kitty
|
1176.4 | | CSC32::MORGAN | Agent General of Chaos | Tue Dec 05 1989 16:15 | 9 |
| Thanx Steve,
I just think it's a _little_ strange killing a live entity to celebrate
a season of birth and happiness. And with all the tree killing going on
in the world...
Other than smell, I think artifical trees look better. After all, how
are the forest deities going to get all that great looking tinsel on
the tree? Magic?
|
1176.5 | Tree Farms | EXIT26::SAARINEN | | Tue Dec 05 1989 16:26 | 12 |
| When I use to live up in Maine...I had some people who were
tree farmers as friends. They had a good deal of land and planted
mostly fir trees that they grew to be your 100% authentic real live
Christmas Tree. They didn't make large amounts of money out
of this enterprise...but it seemed a worthy enterprise just
the same. For every tree they cut down, they planted two.
For myself I never had any problems with celebrating the
christmas season with a live tree. Especially with all that
reindeer meat I have in the freezer downstairs.
-Arthur
|
1176.6 | | CSC32::GORTMAKER | whatsa Gort? | Wed Dec 06 1989 01:40 | 4 |
| Mikie,
I agree I plan to buy a live potted tree and add it to the landscape after
the holiday is over.
Dead trees don't make oxygen,-j
|
1176.7 | cautionary | LESCOM::KALLIS | Efts have feelings, too. | Wed Dec 06 1989 09:13 | 15 |
| Re .3 (Kitty):
>If one must have a real (as opposed to artificial) evergreen tree for
>the festivities, live trees are a good alternative to slain trees.
Good idea -- however, I've talked to nurserymen about it. If you
want to go that route, you've got to take a lot of precautions if
the tree is to survive. The shock of going from a Winter environment
to a household one, and then back again, can be too much for a tree.
Check with a good nurseryman to determine how, given your conditions,
this can be done. He or she may be able to come up with a plan
that will enable you to do this.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
1176.8 | | BSS::BLAZEK | see you dancing, romancing what I want | Wed Dec 06 1989 09:38 | 6 |
|
I would like to wish you all a positive and special holiday
season.
Carla
|
1176.9 | little effort a bit of care. | BLKWDO::KELLOGG | East Coast Beaches | Wed Dec 06 1989 17:45 | 14 |
| to all
we had live trees for 4 or 5 years in Connecticut. The only precautions
we took were to :
a. keep the temperature as low as possible in that room. It was the
family room of a raised ranch which helped.
b. it was a custom to raise and decorate the tree on Christmas Eve.
SO the tree was in the house for maybe 5 days MAX.
c. lights on only when you were in the room admiring the tree.
d. the tree was in a 5 ft diameter aluminum something (like a beer
tub.) which always had water in it.
I drove by that house last June for the first time in many many moons
and all those pine trees were taller than the house! go for it.
|
1176.10 | 'Tis the Season to be :-) | CADSYS::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Thu Dec 07 1989 11:12 | 109 |
| A couple of days ago a copy of "Funny Times: The Newspaper That's Fun"
arrived in my mailbox for unknown reasons -- I presume someone not yet
revealed has given us a subscription for the holidays. It consists of
various selected columns and cartoons, mostly from newspaper
syndicates. Anyway the following column appears in it (quoted without
permission, for "purposes of review" of course ;-)).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Christmas Trees & Planetary Guilt
by Stephanie Brush [really! TC]
My Christmas tree has been barking at me again. But I guess I should
start back at the beginning.
I am basically the perennial winner of the Bleeding-Heart-Sucker-of-
the-Year Award. All of my seasonal mail reads essentially like: "Dear
Miss Resident Occupant Addressee -- Won't you take a moment during this
holiday season to think about the humpbacked wolverine?"
So, I do. Then my checkbook hand starts twitching in a horrifying,
palsied way.
Which leads me to why my Christmas tree is unusually animated this
year. Because it is, in fact, A-LIVE. I do not mean that it was "once
alive" (which is what they usually mean when they say "Live Christmas
Trees"). My Christmas tree is laughing-and-scratchingly alive now,
which means that it still has the roots attached, even as it sits in
the living room. In about five days, Bob and I are going to take it
out in the yard and plant it again, because we are too wracked with
planetary guilt to do otherwise.
Every year, millions of Americans drag the decomposing corpses of
once-alive trees out of their living rooms. I just couldn't stand
feeling like Tony Perkins in "Psycho" anymore: wrapping the prickly old
body in a shower curtain, throwing it in the trunk of a Volkswagen,
sinking the whole thing in a swamp, sweeping up the needles and waiting
for the police to arrive.
Plus, I got into the following heavy-duty conversation about Christmas
trees, with a fellow environmentalist, at a party. "You're a murdering
tree-killer," she said festively. "There aren't enough trees left on
the planet as it is, and you would kill one just to turn it into a sort
of designer coat rack for tinsel."
This was when I realized that the politicization of Christmas trees was
complete and inevitable.
"We don't just go and kill a Christmas tree for fun," I said, quite
abashed. "We always eat it afterwards."
You may have noticed that there's been a shift in the world's political
climate. Hence, all the famous rock musicians have run out of causes
to sing about, because there aren't any wars going on worth protesting.
So what they are doing now, mostly, is musically saving trees.
It is an indisputable fact that the Amazon Rain Forest is being turned
into a giant Grand Union, with parking for 700 million. Jerry Garcia
of the Grateful Dead was recently quoted as saying, "Somebody needs to
do something. It's just incredibly pathetic that it has to be us."
And what can one do, but concur? If you cut down trees, you're bad. If
you invite trees (and their baggage) to live in your house, you're
good. Although having any conifer you've barely been introduced to in
your house is a very strange concept, if you ask me: utterly not the
same as a human house guest.
Having a living tree -- with the roots still attached -- is like
sharing quarters with an extremely irritable water buffalo. The tree
has more round-the-clock needs than any pet or child. The tree, and my
home computer, between them, have about $5,000-worth of climate-control
devices to share. The tree needs humidity. The tree needs
fertilization. The tree needs to have great literature read to it.
The tree weighs 400 pounds. The tree doesn't actually weigh 400 pounds
-- the enormous amount of frozen dirt, wrapped in leaking burlap, which
the tree came equipped with, weighs 399 pounds -- and I have no idea
how we ever dead-lifted the thing into the house, because I blocked out
the experience. I think that what we will probably do is chop a hole
in the floor when we are done with the tree, so that the roots will
just grow down naturally.
I apologize to this tree nearly every day, as it is, that my house
somehow got in its way. And the tree kind of sits there and
photosynthesizes in that superior way that trees have.
I know that this column is going to cause ideological arguments in
households all across America, because it already has: My best friend's
husband told me I was an idiot for refusing to cut down a tree,
because, he said, "They have farms where they raise these trees
deliberately to give up their little lives for Santa. The trees don't
know any better."
"They have farms where they raise minks," I said. "I don't think the
minks sign up to be fur coats voluntarily."
Anyway, I have decided to avoid the entire issue next year, and abide
by the gospel according to Jerry Garcia. It posits that artificial
(once know [sic TC] as "fake and yucchy") trees are good, and not only
"good" but groovy.
I'll be setting up a fake tree: something pink-and-nylon '50s and
frilly and about eight inches tall.
It will be like living with a small transvestite poodle But, unlike my
conscience, it will not bark when I'm trying to sleep.
copyright 1988 Washington Post Writers Group.
|
1176.11 | | CARTUN::JANOWSKI | CitizensAgainstContinentalDrift | Thu Dec 07 1989 13:02 | 3 |
|
If dead Christmas trees were outlawed then only outlaws would have dead
Christmas trees.
|
1176.12 | | CSC32::MORGAN | Agent General of Chaos | Thu Dec 07 1989 13:12 | 2 |
| Probably true, but then, those persons who just have to kill a tree
will recognize their obsession. <Snicker>
|
1176.13 | Confused Infrequent Noter Wants to Know: | CGHUB::WILSON | You CAN Tuna friend's nose! | Mon Dec 11 1989 12:10 | 18 |
| I'm not sure I understand the issue here. Is it the destruction
of "life" of any kind that is being recommended against? In that
case, should we refrain from eating veggies, having cut flowers
as centerpieces, sending greeting cards (made from Wood products,
you know), etc. etc.??
Or is the issue denuding our forests? From what I understand, many
Xmas trees come from Vermont, New Hampshire and Maine. I know NH
is among the most forested states in the U.S. In addition, trees
raised for use at Xmas are a crop, and are replanted every year.
Or is there some sort of religious deference to the killing of trees?
If that is the case, I certainly respect the rights of persons who
adhere to that particular religion, although I don't know what/who
they are.
Jack (Who does not intend to have a Xmas tree, but who has a *LIVE*
Poinsettia in the *Living* room! ;')
|
1176.14 | clarifications, kinda | LESCOM::KALLIS | Efts have feelings, too. | Mon Dec 11 1989 13:19 | 27 |
| Re .13 (Jack):
>I'm not sure I understand the issue here. Is it the destruction
>of "life" of any kind that is being recommended against? In that
>case, should we refrain from eating veggies, having cut flowers
>as centerpieces, sending greeting cards (made from Wood products,
>you know), etc. etc.??
I can't speak for others, but for myself, it's a matter of philosophy
and aesthetics. A Christmas Tree is an appropriate festal decoration
around this time of year, but buying a tree that will be tossed
out in a few weeks seems a waste. Also, left alone, it would live
for many more years. An artificial has (or can have) the same visual
appeal without unnecessarily destroying a live tree. Also,
financially, it makes far more sense: an artificial tree lasts and
generally costs no more thanb three times the price of a natural
one. Our tree's paid for itself in terms of natural ones, and half
of this year and all subsequent years will be "free."
On the absolute right to life: until we can exist without eating
anything, we will have to eat at least vegetables.
>Or is there some sort of religious deference to the killing of trees?
To some.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
1176.15 | No harm done | SALEM::HART | | Mon Dec 11 1989 13:40 | 8 |
|
Christmas trees are grown on farms set up for specificaly that purpose.
Most of the trees around here are grown in Canada on huge tree farms
that replant them every year.
If you want one in your house, they smell great, don't think that
nature will be deprived.
Kevin
|
1176.16 | Not so simple | CADSYS::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Mon Dec 11 1989 14:15 | 29 |
| I certainly don't think that anyone is a "monster" or anything for
using a dead tree. For that matter I'm not sure where I actually
stand on the issue. It's not clear to me that the arguments on one
side outweigh the valid arguments on the other (its a moot point since
we do not celebrate the holiday within my home).
But taking the side of "no dead trees":
1) There is a serious question as to whether taking a life which will
not contribute to warmth, shelter or sustenance is a good symbol for
what the day is supposed to commemorate.
2) The farm-bred issue is somewhat of a red herring. Those farms exist
and are maintained at the cost of resources which would otherwise
plausibly remain in the natural biosphere. If the farms were not
producing trees they would either be left wild, or be being used for
food production which would in turn free other areas now being used
for food production (including marginal lands which are being destroyed
for all non-intensively-supported growth). Fertilizers -- whether
natural (unlikely) or artificial -- are very costly on the environment.
Plus whatever is being done to prevent pest damage.
You grow a tree on a farm only at the cost of trees, other plants,
and animals elsewhere. The life of *this* tree may mean nothing, but
what does mean something is the life or lives that never were so that
this tree could be grown and killed. Those lives are lost as much
as if they had been rape-logged from the wild.
Topher
|
1176.17 | | CSC32::MORGAN | Agent General of Chaos | Mon Dec 11 1989 16:27 | 31 |
| Along with the points Topher and Steve made I think my greatest concern
is that something like a tree is killed for a _celebration_ of
life--the returning sun. This shows that something in our minds is
programmed to think that a death is _appropriate_ for a celebration.
Of course all this goes against the grain of the (quite illusionary)
American Dream. But what messages to ourselves and our young are we
perpetuating?
Now the samething is appliable to meat foods and vegies. I can do
without the turkey and hams. I can even do without the celebration. I
now find myself reacting against the wave of Christmas adds amd music
which pervade my environment. Kill! Eat! Consume!
When Willie Nelson comes on the radio singing "White Christmas" I
salute him with the raised middle finger.
We won't have a tree at my house however we may give small handmade
gifts to each other. Dec. 25th is just another day for me. I think it's
a damn shame that many millions feel alienated for feeling different
about Christmas, and that many millions will be depressed by the
Christsmas season.
But there is a positive note. I sense the tide turning. Many that I
know don't celebrate a commerical gift giving Christmas. They have their
own ways of celebrating, but it isn't Christmas. And to me it feels
better.
BTW, I'm not the Grinch!
For all those, including our Jewish friends, I say happy holidays.
|
1176.18 | | HKFINN::STANLEY | What a long, strange trip its been | Tue Dec 12 1989 13:04 | 41 |
|
We will have a real tree in our home this christmas.
We've moved so far away from nature into our own detached worlds
of plastic trees and manmade shelters. We choose to forget that
death is a part of the experience of life. Without death there
would be no life at all. Every morsel we eat, every particle that
we breath is life sacrificed to maintain life. All of reality is
life feeding upon itself, changing and moving in endless patterns
to create and maintain the atomic illusions of our universe.
If there is a purpose to life at all, it must be to experience it
to the fullest. To enjoy it and partake of it while we are able.
And when it is over, we are planted in the ground to nourish the
trees and all of nature comes together in an unending dance while
life moves through and around and beyond reality.
So there will be a tree in our home this year. And we will smell
it and stare at the lights on cold snowy nights, and the new puppy
will tug on its branches and the children will sit under it dreaming
about christmas morning. We bring the tree into our homes because
of tradition and because somewhere deep in my subliminal, primordial
mind, I've always lived among the trees. I love the trees.
After its all over I'll clean up the needles and put it out with the trash.
Sort of a metaphor for all of us really_:-) We are born and we
contribute what we can. We laugh and love and smell and hurt and
when it is all over, someone will clean up after us and put us out
in the trash._:-)
But the experience... ah the experience of it all.
It will be wonderful. And we will love and admire and appreciate
our tree together. It will be another memory, another of the many
experiences that make life worth living for any being, sentient
or otherwise, who manages to manifest itself here.... maybe even
including the tree itself.
Have a wonderful holiday everyone. I wish you all the happiness
in the world.
Mary
|
1176.19 | real but alive too | BLKWDO::KELLOGG | East Coast Beaches | Wed Dec 13 1989 11:45 | 11 |
| nice nice very nice reply Mary!!! makes me want to RUN out and
get my tree.....I think that I will get a LIVE tree like we use
to for a few years in a row. Then when Christmas is over we can
plant it outside. I remember that everytime I looked at our old
Christmas trees planted out front, it brought back all the sweet
wonderfully special moments of that Christmas! I think those trees
liked hanging around our house too, because they grew like weeds!
try it next year.
r.k.
|
1176.20 | another opinion | NAC::P_RICKARD | | Wed Dec 13 1989 16:45 | 20 |
| Mary, your reply is just beautiful. I've been reading this note with
interest and dismay because I have had many arguments with myself over
the issue of whether or not I wanted to get a Christmas tree. I went
without a tree for about 20 years but my new husband likes them so we bought
one a couple of years ago. This year we talked about it at length and
finally decided that there are people on this planet in remote areas
that need to make a living and some of those folks grow Christmas trees.
True they chose to be where they are and could choose to move to Boston
or L.A. or wherever and do something else, but they are raising Christmas
trees. I felt wonderful buying the tree this year, it is beautiful and
has been grown with great care. I felt even better when it was decorated
and I turned on the lights. My kitties like it too, they bat the
ornaments all over the house! It seems to me that the decision
to have a "dead" tree or a live tree or no tree or a plastic tree is a
very personal one. When I think of all the reasons for me not to get a
tree I'm suddenly giving up my books, and all my food, and my house. So,
I have a tree, I'm happy, and I'm past my fear of writing about my feelings
in this notes file.
Pam Rickard, until now just a reader.
|
1176.21 | Yet another alternative | CGVAX2::PAINTER | Pray for peace, people everywhere. | Wed Dec 13 1989 17:25 | 7 |
|
My own approach to this is to purchase a wreath made of branches of
a tree from a local church 'green' sale. The wonderful aroma of pine
still fills my home and the proceeds go to a worthy cause.
Cindy
|
1176.22 | Waste not, want not | DOCS::DOCSVS | | Thu Dec 14 1989 13:04 | 5 |
| Of course, people with fireplaces need not waste a perfectly good
tree. While it's green, the tree can cheer you up. When it's brown,
it can keep you warm.
--Karen
|
1176.23 | Doesn't work that way, generally. | CADSYS::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Thu Dec 14 1989 13:56 | 11 |
| RE: .22 (Karen)
Sorry, Karen. This will work if you have a wood-buring stove and for
a small percentage of modern fireplaces, but for most fireplaces,
more heat from the room goes up the flue than the fire puts back into
the room. There is a net loss of heat from the house from a fire
in those fireplaces. It may be cheery and provide *emotional* warmth,
but in the long run, the furnace will burn more fuel than if the
fire weren't burnt.
Topher
|
1176.24 | add in a few more calories | BTOVT::BEST_G | in the available light | Thu Dec 14 1989 17:48 | 6 |
|
Yes, Topher, but those of us up here in the sticks know that wood
also warms a person when they carry it, cut it, etc....;-)
Guy
|
1176.25 | Christmas trees | DISCVR::RICHARD | | Thu Dec 14 1989 18:47 | 30 |
|
Had to add my $.02
I've had both types when growing up and both have their
advantages and disadvantages.
One episode of WKRP, Johnny said " and in the spirt of
Christmas I killed a tree for you ", it sort of made
an impression.
But to clear my conscience and to help inform;
Last year I started a small Christmass Tree farm, planted 350 trees.
Next spring I hope to plant 3000 seedlings.
I had a forester walk the land with me and point out all the
dead/dying trees that needed to come down to make room for the
seedlings. A few good trees will have to be removed, but even
those will be used, nice firewood. With proper management I think
I'm helping the environment. Yes, in 8 years I will be killing
thousands of trees but I intend to replace them all and even increase
the plantings.
Hope everyone enjoys their tree, whether real or not, and has a
MERRY CHRISTMAS
later
Ken
|
1176.26 | | AOXOA::STANLEY | Too much of everything is just enuf... | Tue Dec 19 1989 14:54 | 4 |
| All of this has made me wonder, how many people are eating artificial turkeys
this year? :-)
Dave
|
1176.27 | ... or there's Tobin's .. | LESCOM::KALLIS | Efts have feelings, too. | Tue Dec 19 1989 15:09 | 9 |
| Re .26 (Dave):
A Perdue Oven-Stuffer roaster is an artificial turkey. ;-)
Steve Kallis, Jr.
[For those outside the Maine-Washington,D.C. region, Frank Purdue raises
chickens. The Oven-Stuffer roaster is a l_a_r_g_e chicken that's as good
as any turkey.]
|
1176.28 | I love it! | BTOVT::BEST_G | The Guyzer | Tue Dec 19 1989 15:11 | 6 |
|
re: .26 (Dave)
ho ho ho ! ;-)
Guy
|
1176.29 | Yuck! | CUPCSG::JAMES | | Tue Dec 19 1989 16:25 | 3 |
| oh my goodness, even worse -- *live* turkeys....
Estelle
|
1176.30 | Dejavu Makes a Difference! | EXIT26::SAARINEN | | Wed Dec 20 1989 12:31 | 9 |
| Well last night I celebrated by decorating my Christmas Tree,
putting on popcorn strings, flashing lights and bulbs, and
the whole works. And Yes This Conference Can Make A Difference
because I decorated my 4-1/2 foot high *Rubber Plant* instead
of a using anything than what I had in my own living room.
Kind of like Christmas in Jamaica...
-Arthur
|
1176.31 | Early bird... | BSS::VANFLEET | Living my Possibilities | Wed Dec 20 1989 13:17 | 6 |
| Well - I cooked my turkey Monday night. It defrosted prematurely.
Anybody want to start on leftovers a little early?
:-)
Nanci
|
1176.32 | | BSS::BLAZEK | mirror mirror reflects me hazy | Thu Dec 21 1989 09:33 | 8 |
|
Nanci,
"It defrosted prematurely" sums it up so neatly! I can't stop
laughing!
Carla
|
1176.33 | Merry Christmas One and All !! | AYOU28::TRORISON | I'm just sittin' here bustin my @$$ | Thu Dec 21 1989 09:58 | 14 |
| Hello everyone,
After reading all the replies in this note, I thought that it was
time for someone across the pond to pass on the Christmas greeting.
We have just been handed our turkey and box of cakes, as happens
every year, and now it's time to wind down. Tomorrow is a half
day and we close up about 12.00 pm.
So merry christmas to everyone over there and a very Guid New Year.
Best wishes for '90.
Tracy
|