T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1143.1 | A simple digression | CSC32::MORGAN | Cybernetic Society Arrives Today! | Wed Oct 04 1989 13:12 | 15 |
| Reply to .0, Barnette,
First we need to ask ourselves why we think we live in the Aquarian
Age. What indiciators are there? What proof? Are we living in sky
castles of our own design?
I for one think we ARE NOT living in the Aquarian Age. What most fits
this time is the so called Age of Flowers. The age of shallow
movements, limited thinking and unrealistic expectations of what is to
come.
And there is some discussion as to when the Aquarian Age really
starts. Some think it will occur some 400 years from now. Perhaps our
astrological participants could explain this. As fo now I see nothing
but diminishing Picean Age energies.
|
1143.2 | pointer to somewhere??? | USAT05::KASPER | Life's a gift, learn to accept it | Wed Oct 04 1989 13:14 | 10 |
| I think we're in the Piscean Age right now. As a point of interest as
it relates to your questions, somewhere in here I entered an article by
a university professor that compares the dawn of the Aquarian age with
the dawn on the Piscean age (around the birth of Christ) and how it
manifested itself in the symbols and practices of the time. Unfortunately,
I don't remember which note it was in reply to. I think it had something
to do with Harmonic Convergence. If you're interested I can mail you
a hard copy.
Terry
|
1143.3 | did you read my postscript? | NAAD::BARNETTE | Reaching for my distant Destiny... | Wed Oct 04 1989 13:26 | 17 |
|
Re .1, I was kinda addressing the basenote to those (in this
conference) for whom the Aquarian Age is a reality. I didn't
want to discourage input form those that scoff at such a thing,
but I was hoping that they would register their opinions with
humor, with "feathers not flames". Your note *seems* a little
p!ssed-off, or maybe it's just my perception?
I respect the things you believe in (as given in some of your
other notes), and I don't see you as inferior just because you
believe diffreently than I do. I left a postscript to note .0,
asking those who believe differently for their patience.
If it seems like .0 is getting people steamed, I will be happy
to delete it.
Neal/B
|
1143.4 | can you...feel a...brand new Age? | NAAD::BARNETTE | Reaching for my distant Destiny... | Wed Oct 04 1989 13:39 | 22 |
|
Re .2, I'm sure I'll find it, after all there are only 1143
notes and their replies to read ;^).
Seriously, though, yeah I would like to read the hardcopy.
> I think we're in the Piscean Age right now. As a point of interest as
Sometimes, when there is a warm spell in mid-March, people
call it "Spring" even though calendar Spring has yet to occur.
Similiarly, cold, snowy days in April are "Winter". In any case,
I can feel that we are on a cusp of some sort. (No Mikie I can't
"prove" it, in all the years of my life I have yet to see a
single spiritual concept that can be empirically "proven").
There are Crocuses, those little flowers that blossom in February,
poking their little heads above the snow of greed, agression,
bigotry and hate that is the general reality of today's world.
I see them, and I think "Aquarius".
Peace be among us all!
Neal/B
|
1143.5 | | CSC32::MORGAN | Cybernetic Society Arrives Today! | Wed Oct 04 1989 14:05 | 20 |
| Reply to the last -.2, Neal,
Yes I think we are on the cusp of a different time. That's why I refer
to it as the Age of Flowers. I see it as a time of trying new and
different ideas, new paths, new technologies, new psychologies, etc.
But only the best and most realistic will survive, all the rest will
wither.
Nah, I ain't pissed. B^) It seems to serve us well to speculate, but we
need to realize that it's all specualtion. If we, the community of
Dejavuers, are slowly putting something together we need to design
something that is well built, something that will last a while.
To me personally much of the Aquarian Age stuff is poo-poo, simply
fluff that falls outta' peoples brains. Some of it, that critical 10%,
is very important, perhaps life changing. And one percent of that total
might even be world changing.
Sp please go on and speculate what and how you like. I enjoy it. But
I'd like to ask a few questions along the way. B^) Tee-hee.
|
1143.6 | 'scuse me... | NAAD::BARNETTE | Reaching for my distant Destiny... | Wed Oct 04 1989 14:19 | 31 |
|
Re .5,
> Yes I think we are on the cusp of a different time. That's why I refer
> to it as the Age of Flowers. I see it as a time of trying new and
Different names, same thing? I sometimes see the different belief
systems among us as being analogous to different languages. What
is the word for "flower" in French? "Fleur"? To a Frenchman, calling
a fleur a flower probably sounds vulgar and ignorant.
> need to realize that it's all specualtion. If we, the community of
> Dejavuers, are slowly putting something together we need to design
> something that is well built, something that will last a while.
Oh. I thought we were here to share our experiences, feelings,
speculations etc. I didn't know I stepped into the middle of
a project in progress.
> To me personally much of the Aquarian Age stuff is poo-poo, simply
> fluff that falls outta' peoples brains. Some of it, that critical 10%,
Many people who don't believe as I do simply dismiss my ideas
as blathering idiocy. They don't know that I love them for that.
Why? because it is so much better than being beheaded, burned
at the stake, starved to death or any of the other hideous ends
I have come to in previous lives for speaking of such things
(again, no proof!).
Neal/B
|
1143.7 | | CSC32::MORGAN | Cybernetic Society Arrives Today! | Wed Oct 04 1989 14:23 | 4 |
| Reply to .6, Neal,
Dejavu can do what it likes. It still is made up of people like you and
me. So you wanna' create something positive or ...?
|
1143.8 | cusp = bridge | ATSE::FLAHERTY | Nothing is by chance! | Wed Oct 04 1989 14:27 | 21 |
| Hi Neal,
I attended a retreat last weekend where most of the people could be
described as believers in the Aquarian Age (me among them). Your base
note pretty much reflects my personal beliefs.
One of the speakers gave a lecture about the last 10 years and the
upcoming 10 years. She spoke a bit about how the previous ten had been
spent by most of the participants as laying the foundation or platform
of the bridge. She saw the next 10 as the actual building of the
'bridge' into the future. A tape was made of her talk. Hopefully, if
I get a copy and can transcribe it, I would be happy to Email it to those
interested. (Donald, did the tape come out ok? Will I be able to get
copies??!)
Thanks Neal for starting this note.
In love and peace,
Ro
|
1143.9 | The Ages of the Zodiac | DOCS::DOCSVS | | Wed Oct 04 1989 14:30 | 22 |
| As for whether the Aquarian Age is upon us and whether it's
well-defined, think of the "definitions" of certain decades. For
example, "the 60s" as we think of them didn't really take on their
"atmosphere" until the mid-to-latter years of the decade. It may
well be the same with an "Age" -- we don't know we're in it until
we've been there for a long while.
Technically, the Age of Aquarius is supposed to start in the year
2000. Each "Age" lasts 2000 years; the Piscean Age started at the
birth of Christ. The Age of Aries (2000 BC to 1 AD) marked the
rise of western civilization as we know it, including all the famous
wars in classical literature. Before that, the Age of Taurus
(4000-2000 BC) marked the rise of civilization in Egypt, Mesopotamia,
and the ancient Mycenaean and Minoan civilizations. Remember the
Cretan bull-leapers?
These are all just gross generalizations, of course, and the
definitions look awfully neat. (Somehow I have trouble visualizing
an ancient Roman astrologer talking about being in the Age of Aries,
but that's just me.) Here they are, though, for what it's worth.
--Karen
|
1143.10 | astral-projecting acroos that bridge... | NAAD::BARNETTE | Reaching for my distant Destiny... | Wed Oct 04 1989 14:40 | 11 |
|
Hi Ro (do people really call you that?). What do you think about
the age beyond, which I think is Saggitarius? Is it too early
to think or speak of such things? Being the curious type (most
would say 'nosy' 8^), I ponder what kind a future might lie
ahead in say, 4,000 years. Might we be creators of whole worlds
then, rather than individual realities? Will such things as
psychic powers be universal, rather than manifested in so few?
Will we even have need of physical, three-dimensional form?
Neal/B (no they don't call me neal-slash-b 8^)
|
1143.11 | | CSC32::MORGAN | Cybernetic Society Arrives Today! | Wed Oct 04 1989 14:47 | 11 |
| Reply to .9, Karen,
Thanx fo the info.
Here's a neat question. If in the Taurian Age bulls were the objects
of adoration AND sacrifice, and if in the Areian Age goats/sheep were
the objects of adoration AND sacrifice, what will be the object of
adoration AND sacrifice of the Aquraian Age? [This is kinda' a trick
question as the object of adoration AND sacrifice of the Picean Age
wasn't fishes. B^]
|
1143.12 | The Age of Enlightenment! | CSC32::ENTLER | The Wizard | Wed Oct 04 1989 14:54 | 35 |
| RE: .1 "Age of Flowers", Hey Mikey, come on, grow up kid!
(:>)
I call it the age of enlightenment! If you think about it people in
many different countries, Nationalities, lifestyles, religions, etc.
are becoming more aware of other movements, and openness around them.
In Russia you have Glasnost! In South Africa, you have the Apartheid
(sp) movement. In Western Europe, & the satelite counties of Russia we
have vast changes in Governments, People by the thousands are leaving
their countries for more open, Democratic societies. In China, we have
the recent, (and I'm sure not yet over, probably underground) attempts
to bring about a more democratic state. In Central America, we have the
recent attempt to overthrow General Noriega and his government in
Panama. In Bolivia, and much of South America, we have the War or
Drugs. World wide we have the International movements to eliminate
Nucleur Weapons, ( that finally seems to be working), particularly
between the U.S. and the U.S.S.R. Also, the elimination of Chemical
weapons.
In the U. S. we see all kinds of changes: renewal of Black
and other ethnic movements, where the government has failed to educate
and overcome racisms. The right to Life and Anti-Abortion Groups. The
Gay rights movements. The War on Drugs in our own country and the
educational movements towards our youth to fight it. The recent fall
of some of the large Religious movements and organizations from grace,
such as the PTL, Jim Baker, etc.,
In the medical world, we have numerous new advances in medicine and
treatments, cures, and are learning more and more everyday about our
own bodies and the effects of our enviroment and foods on them.
These are only a few, of what I'm sure are hundreds of changes that
either have or are still unfolding in todays world. How long will it
take to complete this cycle. Your guess is as good as mine. I'm just
glad to see a lot of it finally coming about.
Dan
|
1143.13 | how long is a season? | NAAD::BARNETTE | Reaching for my distant Destiny... | Wed Oct 04 1989 14:55 | 27 |
|
Re .9 Hi Karen,
> As for whether the Aquarian Age is upon us and whether it's
> well-defined, think of the "definitions" of certain decades. For
> example, "the 60s" as we think of them didn't really take on their
> "atmosphere" until the mid-to-latter years of the decade. It may
> well be the same with an "Age" -- we don't know we're in it until
> we've been there for a long while.
I picture the ages as being more in the nature of seasons, gradually
fading from one to the next, their actual start/end dates being
useful only for historical perspective. In New England at least,
the seasons are of disparate length - Spring usually lasts only
about eight weeks or so, whereas Winter seems to last about five
months. So it is with ages, or at least I would think it would be.
Different sources differ (ha-ha) upon how long, in years, an "age"
lasts. I've seen 2,000 years, 2,100, 2,200 and 2,400. With apologies
to Mikie, I think something epoch-marking very definitely happened
~2,000 years ago, and I sense something building again. I don't
think that the actual year .a.d. 2000 will seem markedly different
than 1999, any more than last September 22 seemed different than
September 21. But I can see the buds on the trees of our existence,
emerging even through the ice of mankind's winter.
Neal/B
|
1143.14 | have you read One by Richard Bach?! | ATSE::FLAHERTY | Nothing is by chance! | Wed Oct 04 1989 15:00 | 22 |
| Yes Neal that's what they call me, among other things ;')
I know I've read somewhere about that next age, but I can't remember
the source or details. I guess I tend to concentrate on the 'now' and
identifying my soul's purpose for this incarnation. Also, if I have a
choice (and I believe I do), I'd choose this to be my last incarnation.
Unless I got real 'curious' as to how life in the Aquarian Age was
going and I had some cleanup work to do.
Bet Frederick will have a good answer for your question on whether we
would be 'creators of whole worlds, rather than individual realities?'
I think psychic powers will become universal in the Aquarian Age. At
the retreat I mentioned earlier, I was surrounded by people of varying
degrees of psychic powers and gifts. It seems more and more ordinary
folks are developing their latent psychic talents.
And finally, I for one would be happy to throw away the need/desire for
the physcial form and believe that too will come about sometime
(probably towards the end) of the Aquarian Age.
Ro (which is a nickname for Rosetta)
|
1143.15 | a riddle worthy of the sphinx! | NAAD::BARNETTE | Reaching for my distant Destiny... | Wed Oct 04 1989 15:03 | 16 |
|
> Here's a neat question. If in the Taurian Age bulls were the objects
> of adoration AND sacrifice, and if in the Areian Age goats/sheep were
> the objects of adoration AND sacrifice, what will be the object of
> adoration AND sacrifice of the Aquraian Age? [This is kinda' a trick
> question as the object of adoration AND sacrifice of the Picean Age
> wasn't fishes. B^]
Hmmm. Water bearers? Water?
"...and the sea was no more..." Revelations (somewhere)
yuk yuk!
Neal/B
|
1143.16 | | CSC32::MORGAN | Cybernetic Society Arrives Today! | Wed Oct 04 1989 15:07 | 35 |
| To answer, or attempt to answer, the base notes' question I'd say that
what lies beyond the Aquarian Age depends heavily upon what we do and
learn today.
Personally I see a vastly different society and federation of soceities
than what is notmally perceived today.
I see a reality in which people live as long as they want. Thousands of
years perhaps, where people can tap into information and resource
networks which provide their basic needs (perceived today as mystical
connections with the All), including sexual needs, where artificial
intelligence rivals the best amplified human intelligences (taping into
the higher minds, Adepts, Superior Beings), a reality where transport
of physical materials is not necessary as neurolgical transferences
will be a routine daily occurance (perceived today as telepathy and
telekinesis).
But most _frightening_ and most _promising_ is the perception that the
human animal will be seen as a sentinent biological machine which can
be programed and reengineered to better specs, just as any other item
or thing can be reengineered. I see amplified thoughts, amplified
bodies, amplified feelings, amplified perceptions, amplified
sensations, and new orders of "busyness" (ya' gotta' have something to
do with all that ability). Nanotechnology, mature human based
sciences, amplified psychologies, amplified loves and desires should be
the norm.
What we wish for today in precognisence and telepathy will be a daily
necessity in that reality. We should encounter and engage discarnate
life forms, communicating with them via devices like telephones.
Perhaps we'll meet energyforms passing through our little dimension,
call them Gods if you like. Some will be friends and enemies, others
will be pets. (Rover, go see who's in the kitchen.) I see a vastly
different future shaping. And I see much alignment troubles.
|
1143.17 | The AGE of Capricorn follows Aquarius | AICAD::DOLLIVER | Watching my life go by ... | Wed Oct 04 1989 15:07 | 26 |
| The Earth's axis of rotation wobbles very slightly. Thus, if we drew a
line from the South Pole through the North Pole and out into space, that
line would not point directly at the North Star, but rather would slowly
encircle it once every 24000+ years or so (or about 2000+ years to
pass through each of 12 zodiac signs). This process is called the
"precession" of the Earth's axis.
If the North Star is assumed to be a central point which falls within no
sign (or all signs) then the current AGE is called the AGE of Pisces
because the Earth's axis line is currently directed towards a point
within the zodiac section called Pisces relative to the North Star.
The precession of the Earth's axis follows a "clockwise" direction
around the zodiac, while the zodiac is ordered in a "counter-clockwise"
direction. The absolute clock-face directions don't really matter
except to show that it precesses in reverse of the standard astrological
zodiac organization. Thus, while typically the signs progress from
..Aries to Taurus to Gemini.. the precession of the axis transits from
..Aries to Pisces to Aquarius to Capricorn..
Thus the Earth's axis currently points to a zodiac position identified
as the very _beginning_ of Pisces (between 0 and 1 degrees of Pisces)
and is about to precess into Aquarius, which is then to be followed by
the AGE of Capricorn, and then the AGE of Sagittarius, Scorpio, Libra...
Todd
|
1143.18 | | CSC32::MORGAN | Cybernetic Society Arrives Today! | Wed Oct 04 1989 15:14 | 8 |
| Reply to .14, Neal,
> Hmmm. Water bearers? Water?
You got it. And it's not particularly an illogical conception of
reality. The Aquarian Age will probably adore AND sacrifice human
nature. We will be seen as Gods of the past while the New Human will
live other programs.
|
1143.19 | Whatever. 8^) | NAAD::BARNETTE | Reaching for my distant Destiny... | Wed Oct 04 1989 15:15 | 8 |
|
Thanks for the info Todd! (Shows how much I know about astrology 8^).
I've also read that the Earth's "wobble" takes ~26,000 years
to complete - thus accounting for the differing views on how
long an "age" is.
Neal/B
|
1143.20 | | CSC32::MORGAN | Cybernetic Society Arrives Today! | Wed Oct 04 1989 15:20 | 16 |
| Reply to .17, Todd,
Thanx Todd,
> Thus the Earth's axis currently points to a zodiac position identified
> as the very _beginning_ of Pisces (between 0 and 1 degrees of Pisces)
> and is about to precess into Aquarius, which is then to be followed by
> the AGE of Capricorn, and then the AGE of Sagittarius, Scorpio,
> Libra...
And approx. when will the pole actually move into Aquarius? Another
question involves the different astrological systems emerging today.
One system shows Libra (my sign, snicker B^) taking only half a house
while two other constellations are impinging the Zodiac. Are there any
new constellations forcing their way into the Zodiac at this point in
time?
|
1143.21 | Holy Aldous-Huxley-Isaac-Asimov, Batman! | NAAD::BARNETTE | Reaching for my distant Destiny... | Wed Oct 04 1989 15:21 | 9 |
|
Re .18,
> nature. We will be seen as Gods of the past while the New Human will
> live other programs.
Interesting Mikie. What is a 'program', in this context?
Neal/B
|
1143.23 | | CSC32::MORGAN | Cybernetic Society Arrives Today! | Wed Oct 04 1989 15:27 | 11 |
| Reply to .21, Neal,
The program is the individuals neurogenetic social complex. All the
factors including genetics, genetic disposition, type and level of
thought, materials consumed (emotionally and physically) which modify
the neurogenetic complex. The body is the mind is the body. Any affect
upon the body is an affect upon the mind which becomes the newer
program.
New programs will emerge. Of their types and kinds I can only guess. I
will say that economics will play it's usual part.
|
1143.24 | I found it | USAT05::KASPER | Life's a gift, learn to accept it | Wed Oct 04 1989 15:30 | 7 |
| re: .1 (Me)
I found (whew!) the note I entered that talks about the Piscean and
Aquarian Ages. If you're intertested see 827.8 (an article by a
university professor).
Terry
|
1143.25 | | CSC32::MORGAN | Cybernetic Society Arrives Today! | Wed Oct 04 1989 15:33 | 21 |
| reply to .22, Handy,
> re:morgan
> I can see why you ask the questions you do!!Concepts,concepts,
> will get you nowhere.The future cannot be developed with the mind.
> Where do you get your authority???Fluff!!!!!
Say what you like, the human mind _will_ create our futures. Either we
take control of the process by taking control of our minds or we suffer
the effects of a horribly skewed process.
My authoirty is ME. Don't forget it. B^)
You make a _deadly_ assumption in even assuming that a spirit exists.
We cannot even assume a human future exists at this point. We can
however strive to build one though.
What if spirit does not exist? Where will you be? The Void? I sense
some real dogma here. And I just happen to have a peck of catma on
hand...
|
1143.26 | hee hee hee | NAAD::BARNETTE | Reaching for my distant Destiny... | Wed Oct 04 1989 15:37 | 12 |
|
Re .24, that's why response time has been so slow. Terry Kasper
has been doing a Search on the DEJAVU conference for the string,
"ages". 8^)
Re .23,
%BARNETTE-F-POLYSYLLABLE, reply contains a word with too many syllables
(looks like i need a software upgrade now!)
Neal/B
|
1143.27 | fascinating. | NAAD::BARNETTE | Reaching for my distant Destiny... | Wed Oct 04 1989 15:53 | 17 |
|
Just read 827.8. Have a powerful urge to cross-post it in IOSG::YOU_
KNOW_WHERE. Someone talk me out of it! Quick!
Seriously though, "coincidences" like some of those in 827.8 have
a kind of ring to them, with me - maybe I just like the sound of
them, or maybe there's something to them - at this point I lean
toward the latter. Interesting thought, that Aquarian religious
thought might supplant Christianity. Did the ancient Pagans resist
their subjugation as vigorously as the Fundamentalists are fighting
against "New-Ageism" now? Also, Christianity kinda went on the
offensive (in a very physical way, I might add) against the ancient
beliefs. I think the Aquarian age will be more Yin in nature (if
I use the term correctly), and note of a nature to force things
down people's throats.
Neal/B
|
1143.28 | | PACKER::HANDY | | Wed Oct 04 1989 16:04 | 9 |
| re:25
The human mind enlightened by the spirit will create.Once a
majority of the people are outside of this thing called Karma,and
become thier own stars.Very few people controll their minds,most are
reacting to emotional programing.Yours i can feel is full of fear and
confusion.Limited human ego is no authority!Blind.One more murmering
soul.?
I dont assume anything!I KNOW...Just like that.
You to could have knowing, its available to all.
|
1143.29 | are we not One? | NAAD::BARNETTE | Reaching for my distant Destiny... | Wed Oct 04 1989 16:24 | 6 |
|
Re PACKER::HANDY (I don't know your name), do you believe then that
there are no "ages" as such, stages of progression for the human
race as a whole?
Neal/B
|
1143.30 | | CSC32::MORGAN | Cybernetic Society Arrives Today! | Wed Oct 04 1989 16:30 | 42 |
| RE: <<< Note 1143.27 by NAAD::BARNETTE "Reaching for my distant Destiny..." >>>
> Just read 827.8. Have a powerful urge to cross-post it in IOSG::YOU_
> KNOW_WHERE. Someone talk me out of it! Quick!
Ok, don't do it. It'll backfire anyway. B^)
> Seriously though, "coincidences" like some of those in 827.8 have
> a kind of ring to them, with me - maybe I just like the sound of
> them, or maybe there's something to them - at this point I lean
> toward the latter.
Although I disagree with what doomed the Greek and Roman Empires I will
agree with the premise of the article.
> Interesting thought, that Aquarian religious thought might supplant
> Christianity. Did the ancient Pagans resist their subjugation as
> vigorously as the Fundamentalists are fighting against "New-Ageism"
> now? Also, Christianity kinda went on the offensive (in a very physical
> way, I might add) against the ancient beliefs. I think the Aquarian age
> will be more Yin in nature (if I use the term correctly), and note of a
> nature to force things down people's throats.
The ancient pagans didn't fight the emerging metaphors the way the
fundamentalists do today. There's was more a political question than
religious. Rome was famous for tolerance of other religious structures.
But over time, due to health concerns, criminal elements in government,
and general public disinterest (sounds like today??) Rome, like it's
predesessors, lost the race to cultural immortality. Politically one had
to venerate, worship the Emperors genus, which I take was his spirit or
divinity. Mostly it was just his 'greatness" that was worhiped.
Our local neighborhood Christians wouldn't worship it. Then it was a
political crime, not a religious crime, and became a kind of litmus
test. Another problem perceived was that the Romans thought the
Christain Cult abhorent because of human sacrifice. Long before,
perhaps some centuries Romans and Greeks turned to animal and vegetable
sacrifice as human sacrifice was thought to be bad.
And yes there will be troubles now as new forces align and confront
each other.
|
1143.31 | | CSC32::MORGAN | Cybernetic Society Arrives Today! | Wed Oct 04 1989 16:36 | 4 |
| Reply to .28, Handy,
I disagree. I perceive that we assume that we know. There is a
difference.
|
1143.32 | Stop to consider | DNEAST::CHRISTENSENL | Keeper of the Myth | Wed Oct 04 1989 16:47 | 9 |
|
Consider, possibly, there are cultural boundries being crossed
here and with those a real set-up for mis-communication.
Let us just say for a moment that myth and experience are identical.
Yes, both valid, and yes pointing at a higher truth.
l
|
1143.33 | I feel the blindness is part of a greater harmony | BOOKIE::ENGLAND | I'm a part of It's a part of me | Wed Oct 04 1989 17:14 | 26 |
| Re: .28 (Handy)
There's something about the way you present your feelings and
"knowings" that doesn't seem natural for me. I hope you don't
mind me mentioning it. I agree with many of the things you say,
yet your "position" seems to be one of being greater than others --
and I get the visual image of you shouting down from your "elevation",
at those you see as lesser. This, in no way encourages me to join you.
I think if someone is truly focused on talking about their "elevation",
then they can't be experiencing it very fully. There must be much
better things to do (in exploring that new space) than in shouting down
at others.
As for helping others reach certain heights...I think it's done
naturally with love and understanding. People usually won't do what
you tell them to do...so telling them what they should be doing, may
make them turn away. It also doesn't show any respect for their
Godliness. Loving them, and encouraging them to question for
themselves, may be much better in aiding them to stop whatever dramas
they may be interested in stopping. But it's up to them...and being
pushed only works for people who do what others tell them to do.
Just some thoughts...
Jerri
|
1143.34 | Fishy.. | PCOJCT::SCHEIBEL | Temporary Insanity | Wed Oct 04 1989 17:35 | 11 |
| RE. .11; .15; et al
In response to the statement that although bulls were
worship/sacrificial figures in the Taurean Age, and sheep and goats
in the Arian Age - well, hello, Piscean - the fish is a symbol for
Christ, used from the time of the Early Christian Church to today.
Remember your "Honk if you love..." bumper stickers?
All professional water bearers please take note...
|
1143.35 | I'll trade two fish for a 386 clone... | CSC32::MORGAN | Cybernetic Society Arrives Today! | Wed Oct 04 1989 17:53 | 19 |
| Reply to .34, Scheibel,
A fishy deal indeed...
That symbol system should have appropraited the fish as the symbol of
adoration and sacrifice. However a step back to times of human
sacrifice combined the so called final sacrifice with the sacrifical
fishes, hence a human soter.
Although fictions like STRANGER IN A STRANGE LAND and SOYLENT GREEN are
precursors to sacrifical water bearers I doubt that neither civil law
nor human consciousness will allow it. Therfore I postulate a loss of
human nature over a loss of human life. and such seems to be happening
today. Everything changes, the changes are threatening but unavoidable.
And it follows in human history that whatever is worshiped is generally
lost in and to suceeding cultures. The profane becomes sacred, the
sacred profane and both are lost in the march of history.
|
1143.36 | | CSC32::MORGAN | Cybernetic Society Arrives Today! | Wed Oct 04 1989 17:56 | 4 |
| And a further thought I had...
Evolutionary pressure dictates which way a species will mutate. What
are our evolutionary pressures today? What will they be tomorrow?
|
1143.37 | Note 1143.0 - my own thoughts | NAAD::BARNETTE | Chillybean does California! | Thu Oct 05 1989 11:15 | 66 |
|
We will be much less bound by those aspects of reality that
we currently regard as physical laws. Astral travel
will be common. The distances between places will therefore
become meaningless.
What I shall call "extended" psychic powers (those beyond
the mere ability to read Akashic records and peer into the
past and future) will be the favored field of psychic study.
The ability to time-travel. To pass through solid objects.
To illuminate a dark room just by thinking about it. To
heal instantly an injury.
Technology, vehicles, buildings, will disappear, along with
their attendant destructive effect upon the environment.
Those who require dwellings for whatever reason will chose
those things such as caves which naturally occur in the
environment - and will find them much more comfortable
and satisfying than houses constructed of slain trees.
Communication with other forms of life will begin to be
common. The realization that many things have awareness
(that had not been thought to before) will begin to gain
acceptance during the Aquarian years. By the Capricornian,
these things will be commonplace.
Those that are advanced now, e.g. practicing psychics, will
be aware of their dual nature as male and female, and the
androgenous human will appear. As fewer and fewer persons
have need of incarnation in this world, more and more will
embrace celibacy, many will also be incapable of producing
offspring (this by choice). Those who have twin souls that
were once one, will begin to merge back together, appearing
as the androgenous beings given above.
The Earth is our gracious host for whatever time we require
her. She did not, however, come to be for the sole purpose of
our permenent dwelling, nor were we created to live upon her
forever. The time must come when we say our fond farewell
to this lovely place which many have come to regard as Mother.
One day we must leave the nest, even as we leave our earthly
parents today, and go forth into the world and create our own
nests.
Wild flights of fancy? Bizarre speculation? Ravings of a lunatic?
Fluff from whatever it is that passes for a brain in this Neal
person? I leave it for you to decide. But it gives me enjoyment
to ponder such things, and share my ponderings and hear those
of others. Take it for what it's worth to you.
And what good does it do? It gives a vision of hope, a future
to look forward to. It's something more positive than a belief
that we are blind slaves to the mechanism of earth-evolution.
An ideal that we are more than just animals. For the CYOR folks,
it's a creation of a reality in which we rejoice in our Oneness
and truly embrace each other in love, knowing that it is ourself
that we are embracing. That too is why I don't mind if some
who read this consider me a goofball. I hope it gives them a
good laugh! I mean it! If it does, then I have found some small
way of blessing their day, of bringing a smile to their face.
To all, have a splendid, magnificent day!
Neal/B
|
1143.38 | Sounds so familiar... | ATSE::FLAHERTY | Nothing is by chance! | Thu Oct 05 1989 11:25 | 12 |
| Neal (.37),
Lovely thoughts. They made me smile and think of an imminent future or
is it a distant past...
As I mentioned earlier, I spent the weekend at a retreat with similar
minded folks so it sounds very sane to me ;')
Love to you,
Ro
|
1143.39 | This is the dawning of the Age of Aquarius... | CGVAX2::PAINTER | I'm enlightened and you're... | Thu Oct 05 1989 12:34 | 12 |
| Re.(Barnette)
Hi Neal,
Hey, sounds good to me!
As for IOSG:: - nah, don't do it. Just observe.
Enjoy...
Cindy
|
1143.40 | Crossposted from 'Inspirational Lyrics' note. | CGVAX2::PAINTER | One small step... | Thu Oct 05 1989 12:49 | 23 |
|
Aquarius/Let The Sun Shine
--------------------------
When the moon is in the 7th house
And Jupiter's aligned with Mars
Then peace will guide the planet
And love will steer the stars.
This is the dawning of the Age of Aquarius, the Age of Aquarius,
Aquarius, Aquarius.
Harmony and understanding
Sympathy and trust abounding.
No more falsehoods or derisions
Golden living dreams of visions
Mystic crystal revelations
And the mind's true liberation, Aquarius.
Let the sun shine, let the sun shine.
Open up your heart and let it shine on in.
Recorded by: The 5th Dimension
|
1143.41 | Hindu Cycle of Ages | CIMAMT::TOLAA | | Thu Oct 05 1989 13:10 | 78 |
|
It's said that the ages are a cycle, not a forever-upward sequence.
I don't know about the ages as they relate to the Zodiacal cycle,
but there is also the concept of the Yugas in India. The Hindus
believed that the refinement of life on earth revolves through a
cycle of four Yugas, or ages -- Kali, Dwapara, Treta, and Satya.
o Kali Yuga is the age of chaos, darkness, and destruction.
o Dwapara Yuga is the age of dawning light.
o Treta Yuga is the age of mature knowledge and wisdom.
o Satya Yuga is the age of perfection.
There are different opinions regarding which age we are in now and
how long the ages last. I think that most adherents of this system
believe that we are now in Kali Yuga and that this age lasts for
a very, very, very long time. I'm not sure, but I believe the
figure is several hundred thousands of years.
Others, namely Sri Yukteswar, the Guru
of Paramahansa Yogananda (one of the first yogis to teach in America),
believe that this traditional interpretation is wrong and that the
ages are much shorter -- four to 12 thousand years, and that we
are now fully out of Kali Yuga and in the beginning of Dwapara
Yuga. (Certainly a less depressing theory!) In this system,
on the ascending half of the cycle, Kali Yuga lasts 500 years,
and each successive ascending age is longer than the last.
Satya Yuga being four thousand years long (I think). The
ages are the same length on the descending side.
So there's a gradual build up toward an apex of perfection then
a slow, almost imperceptible slide back downward into confusion.
The entire cycle is 24,000 years in length.
Sri Yuktesar offers a most interesting reason for this cycle.
He says that human consciousness is affected by spiritual emanations
from the center of the galaxy and that there is a regular variation
in the distance of our solar system from the galactic core. The
further we are from the center, the more confused and dark our minds
are. The closer we are, the clearer, stronger and more harmonious
our minds are. The rise and fall, not only of civilization, but of the
general quality of human consciousness, corresponds to our distance
from center of the galaxy. (A timely coincidence: Just last night I
read about a speculation that there may be "white holes" at the
centers of a galaxies, from which energy streams into this universe.)
He also says the progression of the Yugas is more like a spiral than
a closed circle. Each Kali Yuga is a little less dark than the previous
Kali Yuga. Each Satya Yuga is a little more sublime than the last.
He also says that this is a world cycle. Individuals evolve at their
own rate and may "get off the wheel" in any age. It's said that
although life and inner work are far more difficult in the darker
times, the dark days provide more impulse and opportunity for
growth than more harmonious eras. (Who wants to grow when life
is naturally easy and pleasant?)
So, according to this model, there have been many rises and falls
in human history. Currently, we're on a very long period of overall
ascent (though there may be partial and temporary regresssions) that will
culminate in a golden age around 12,000 A.D.
But the celebration parties at that distant time will probably
include a touch of irony, because immediately after the crest of
the cycle, the long slide back downward will begin. (Maybe we
should buy a nice bottle of something and bury it in a time capsule for them.
Just think -- 10,000 year old cognac at the peak of perfection. Then again,
those perfect goody-two-shoes probably don't drink!)
--- For what it's worth to you...
Fred
|
1143.42 | Maybe we'll sacrifice buckets of water! | DOCS::DOCSVS | | Thu Oct 05 1989 13:52 | 13 |
| re: .11
Trick question, eh? Well, as you recall the fish was extensively
used as a symbol of the Christian church, and that for many years
afterward good Christians (and later good Catholics) ate fish on
meatless days... so they might not be objects of adoration and
sacrifice, but they certainly were symbols.
In the Aquarian Age? Hmmm. Very good question. Streams of water?
Water jugs? Waves? I guess we won't know till we're there, but
it's certainly fun to think about.
--Karen
|
1143.43 | Wet-n-Wild | USAT05::KASPER | Life's a gift, learn to accept it | Thu Oct 05 1989 13:55 | 5 |
| re: .11
Maybe we'll have ritual water balloon fights! Squirt guns too!
Terry
|
1143.44 | Hindu Cycle of Ages | BOOKIE::ENGLAND | I'm a part of It's a part of me | Thu Oct 05 1989 15:19 | 7 |
| Re: .41 (Fred)
That was interesting reading! It certainly *would* be nice to
leave a bottle of something for those dear souls who live at
the peak. :-)
Jerri
|
1143.45 | just how long is that wobble, anyway? | NAAD::BARNETTE | Chillybean does California! | Thu Oct 05 1989 15:21 | 18 |
|
>So there's a gradual build up toward an apex of perfection then
>a slow, almost imperceptible slide back downward into confusion.
>The entire cycle is 24,000 years in length.
There it is again, that 24,000 year figure which corresponds to
the "wobble" of the Earth. Perhaps what we are seeing here is the
equivalent of different cultures' measurements of a 'year' - Native
peoples of what is now North America counted the passing of "moons",
whereas those who came later to this land counted "seasons", in
determining when to plant crops. Twelve moons, four seasons - still
amounting to a year (although there was the concept of months also).
Re (Cindy), nice, I always loved that song, even before I knew what
it meant (I was 11 when it came out). But - we're talking about
the age of Capricorn, not Aquarius! 8^)
Neal/B
|
1143.46 | maybe only one bottle will be left 8^) | NAAD::BARNETTE | Chillybean does California! | Thu Oct 05 1989 15:27 | 11 |
|
> That was interesting reading! It certainly *would* be nice to
> leave a bottle of something for those dear souls who live at
> the peak. :-)
Maybe better lay in a few hundred cases of French '89, which I hear
is expected to be one of the all-time vintage years of the century.
One bottle wouldn't go very far - they would think us terribly stingy.
8^)
Neal/B
|
1143.47 | Not again! I missed the point entirely... | CGVAX2::PAINTER | One small step... | Thu Oct 05 1989 15:55 | 8 |
| Re. Capricorn Age - Oh Rats! Sorry, Neal.
OK, I'll try the Scorpionic Age. "Metaphysical Sex" by Julius Evola
(author of said book).
Suppose we could just skip a few ages inbetween?
Cindy
|
1143.48 | could think of some good jokes about that one... | NAAD::BARNETTE | Creating a California reality! | Thu Oct 05 1989 16:49 | 10 |
|
> OK, I'll try the Scorpionic Age. "Metaphysical Sex" by Julius Evola
Something to look forward to, if we ever get to the Age of Scorpio!
> Suppose we could just skip a few ages inbetween?
I was wondering if we have to go through all of 'em.
8^)
|
1143.49 | Mark your calendar | CIMAMT::TOLAA | | Thu Oct 05 1989 18:25 | 21 |
|
Everyone:
Lets bury that case of '89 French wine along a bunch of gazoos and whistles,
some confetti and firecrackers and all agree to meet at the crowning moment
of the Golden Age and have a good ol' rock'n roll party. Who cares if
they stare?
That might be a difficult date to keep, though --
And about that precious memory you think you need to save...
Write it in your notebook, the yellowed pages blow away.
Write in on the wall, the building falls, is condemned, and razed.
Keep it firmly in mind? Only till your brain is a dustbag in the grave.
Next thing you know you don't know nuthin, you're a babbling little babe.
:).. (drool)
Maybe we can't do it, but it would be a grand pledge.
|
1143.50 | Wanna' make some money? | CSC32::MORGAN | Cybernetic Society Arrives Today! | Thu Oct 05 1989 18:41 | 14 |
| I've had an idea for a few years that could provide some money for
the business minded.
Create a series of unique codes with location, id number and birth
date, then imprint this code deeply into the human psyche. From here
you could have the individual write a message to their future selves
with general stuff, a little history, etc. Then press the message into
a thin but solid tablet of longlived plastic. Store the tablet at the
coded location and wait for the person the be reborn with the deeply
imprinted code.
Call them Rebirth Messages if you like and haul the money in. The only
problem is in storing the plastic tablets out of sunlight. Anyone
wanna' put up a couple grand to start the project?? B^)
|
1143.51 | | USWAV1::JOLLIMORE | | Fri Oct 06 1989 09:13 | 7 |
| Neal/B
You're a goofball!
So am I. ;')
Jay
|
1143.52 | Sometimes Perception is Reality!!! | CIMNET::ATKINSON | | Fri Oct 06 1989 10:49 | 29 |
| re:37 Neal
Your perceptions of the coming age are fairly accurate ....nice to see
that you are tapping in to the Universal flux... however as was
mentioned in one of the other replies, it does hinge on the overall
progression of consciousness as a whole here. As each individual begins
to get a more accurate perception of their unlimited potential as a
divine being the will elevate mass consciousness and things will change
dramatically. And if you progress sufficiently you will be doing the
"Creator God" routine elsewhere. Now there's something to contemplate!!!
as for symbols....the age of aquarius = Waterbearer (the water of life)
= Water force (water elementals = ondines) = Emotional body = learning
balance of emotions. Emotions charge all phases of your lifeflow either
negatively or positively and are the cement between the bricks that
create your reality...if you balance your emotions it does not mean that
there is no charge to them, it just means that you balance your lifeflow
and are able to go into beingness (centered) from which point you can
create and manifest instanteously...so you will be sacrificing emotional
disbalance. Aslo, since Aquarius is an Air Sign = Mental Body = ( Air
Elementals = Sylphs) = learning balance of the mental functions. Since
thoughtforms (mental body = bricks) are then qualified by emotions
(Emotional body = cement) creating your current reality you will be
sacrificing mental and emotional disbalance and learning about
beingness and divine creation! Alchemy...Not too shabby!
In Light and Love,
Zeffel
|
1143.53 | Bricks and cement | CGVAX2::PAINTER | One small step... | Fri Oct 06 1989 12:13 | 14 |
|
Zeffel,
That's interesting you should mention bricks and cement. I had a dream
about 8-10 months ago about building a wall with a firm foundation. On
the various bricks were the names of people close to me I could count
on in case of an emergency. The cement, of course, is Love.
Of course this all ties in with my unstable feelings about life before
these current times, given my chaotic childhood and life up to now, etc.,
etc., and there are lots of other things which can be drawn from the
dream above, however this is by far the most significant.
Cindy
|
1143.54 | HUH? | SMD72J::VEACH | SEA WITCH | Thu Oct 12 1989 17:21 | 5 |
| NEAL,
WHAT DOES 8^ MEAN?
KITTY
|
1143.55 | where did you see it? | NAAD::BARNETTE | | Thu Oct 12 1989 18:35 | 10 |
|
> NEAL,
>
> WHAT DOES 8^ MEAN?
>
> KITTY
Looks like a smiley-face without the smile.
|
1143.56 | symbol | MARKER::AREGO | | Mon Oct 16 1989 13:50 | 6 |
| .42
Aquarian age, rules intelligence and humanity. The actual symbol
is that of a human pouring knowledge...
Carol
|
1143.57 | The future and beyond | CGVAX2::PAINTER | One small step... | Mon Oct 16 1989 19:07 | 21 |
|
Re.56 (Arego)
Interesting. Just took a look back through the first bunch of notes
and in .10 Neal mentions something about collective CYOR.
Perhaps with the intelligence and the (focus on?) humanity during the
Aquarian Age, poverty, starvation and other sufferings on the physical
plane will be eliminated and all souls will be enlightened and raised
to such a level of 'knowing' that we can indeed work as a collective
group to go forward from there and create new worlds, be they physical
or something we cannot even comprehend at the moment.
But first we have to work in small groups to get into practice for the
bigger leap. As Mother Teresa said when asked about what one man could
do to best assist in accomplishing world peace, she replied, "Go home
and love your family."
In hope,
Cindy
|
1143.58 | | MARKER::AREGO | | Tue Oct 17 1989 10:12 | 15 |
| .57
I have also read that some believe that there will be one world
government, no more wars, however; before we accomplish this the
world's population will decrease significantly. (Don't know how,
quakes, plagues, or other natural disasters or a final war?) But, I
personally believe that the focus will be on humanity and peace.
The Piscean age, came in with many fears and illusionism. Also,
deceptions, and on the positive side - service.
Guess we will wait to see...
Carol
|
1143.59 | Mother Teresa is right on | CARTUN::BERGGREN | | Tue Oct 17 1989 11:17 | 17 |
| Cindy re.57
Mother Teresa's advice of what one person *can* do to best assist
the accomplishment of world peace - "Go home and love your family",
is right on the mark.
Too often we think we are powerless as individuals to do anything
to affect such a grand thing as world peace. This is not true. To
believe otherwise results in powerlessness, frustration, and apathy.
Reminds me of an old Chinese proverb (one of my favorites):
If every man swept in front of his own door, the whole earth
would be clean.
Kb
|
1143.60 | Hiding in Lompoc, eh? | SWAM2::BRADLEY_RI | | Wed May 30 1990 21:07 | 4 |
| Hmmm. This appears to be the Neal I'll be visiting tomorrow. A fellow
Aquarian-Ager.
RB
|