T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1105.1 | a closed mind is a terrible thing for haste | FREEBE::TURNER | | Mon Aug 20 1990 17:40 | 13 |
| This doesn't prove a thing. Who was looking over his shoulder while
he encrypted it? Guardian angels or familiar spirits might have
a vested interest in this. In the bible the first lie was "Ye shall
not surely die" said to Eve. I was always taught that this lie is
still being told. Just because a "spirit says he's someone doesn't
make it so. How do you know? What are your assumptions? Just because
a spirit knows info that no one else would know but the dead, doesn't
constitute proof. Jesus spoke of death a a sleep, shich makes a
lot of sense to me. All it takes is a tiny bit of damage to the
reticular activating system and a person never wakes up again. Rotting
away to dust is major damage by comparison.
john
|
1105.2 | | REGENT::WAGNER | | Tue Aug 21 1990 09:50 | 19 |
| john:
Shades of paranoia; I'm sure that making sure no one was around at
the time was the easiest part of the experiment. If no one was aware
of the experiment when he encoded it, no one would have been tempted
to "look over his shoulder." Speaking of temptation, I'm not sure what
the rest of your paragraph has to do with what was discussed in .0 but
one comment I would like to make on that part of your paragraph:
Actually, it must have been Adam who said the first lie since, when
God asked him, he was the one who passed responsibility and blame to eve
for his own misdeeds. Then Eve turned around and shirked her
responsibility by blaming the serpent. From MY perspective, the serpent
was the only one telling the truth; there is no death except for physical
death. Just my opinion(and a workable one.)
Ernie,
Ernie
|
1105.3 | Serpent told a half-truth | XLIB::JACKSON | Collis Jackson | Tue Aug 21 1990 11:45 | 1 |
| ...which is much more dangerous than any lie...
|
1105.4 | And the Whole Truth? | REGENT::WAGNER | | Wed Aug 22 1990 09:36 | 5 |
| And in some circumstances, the whole truth can be even more dangerous;
especially when it involves those of us who refuse to hear it (:'> ).
Ernie
|
1105.5 | Worthwhile nevertheless... | CADSYS::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Wed Aug 22 1990 13:41 | 13 |
| RE: .1 (john)
I quite agree. Obtaining veridical information, supposedly from the
spirits of the dead, can never eliminate the possability that the
information was obtained from other sources -- including noncorporeal
observers and some information gathering ability intrinsic to the
living medium (ESP). The hope is that by gathering many different
kinds of evidence and looking at the patterns within that evidence that
post-mortem survival of the personality may emerge as the most
plausible of the alternate hypotheses. As a piece of that larger
effort, therefore, I support this research program.
Topher
|
1105.6 | Got it ! | WBC::BAKER | Whatever happened to Fay Wrey... | Fri Nov 16 1990 12:24 | 11 |
| I've got the secret word !!! I know what Barber said:
R O S E B U D
;}
~art
|