[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference hydra::dejavu

Title:Psychic Phenomena
Notice:Please read note 1.0-1.* before writing
Moderator:JARETH::PAINTER
Created:Wed Jan 22 1986
Last Modified:Tue May 27 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:2143
Total number of notes:41773

969.0. "Find the Sufi" by AYOV18::BCOOK (Zaman, makan, ikhwan) Fri Jan 27 1989 12:02

    You enter a room. Inside the room sit a Madman, a Fool and a Sufi.
    How would you go about telling which was which?
    
    (Please feel free to be as serious or as amusing as you like...)
    
    Brian
    
    PS (Whilst it's possible that there is only one person in the room
    I'm assuming here that there's three!)
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
969.1Odd man outDNEAST::CHRISTENSENLFri Jan 27 1989 12:515
    The Fool and the Madman never stop talking. Only the Fool can be 
    believed.
    
    L.
    
969.2There seem to be lots of idiot savants in this worldWRO8A::WARDFRGoing HOME--as an AdventurerFri Jan 27 1989 12:5417
    re: .0
     
         Brian, give me a hint.  Does it have anything to do
    with cults?  Are they in a barber shop?   Does the room
    have plants in it?  Is the room a place of reverence?
    Is there any food in the room?  Is it a bathroom (same as
    a place of reverence, perhaps)?  Can you tell by their
    feet/shoes (same as bathroom/place of reverence)?  Is any
    of them making any sounds (same as feet, et al)?  Am
    I whistling as I enter the room?  Am I in a wheelchair or
    on crutches as I enter?  
    
         I'm sorry, insufficient data for a response...
    
    
    Frederick
    
969.3RAINBO::HARDYFri Jan 27 1989 13:245
    Ask each one.  The Sufi is the one who is lying.
    
    Pat
    
969.4How does each approach reality?CADSYS::COOPERTopher CooperFri Jan 27 1989 14:2111
    Ask each "What is 2+2?".
    
    The fool won't know, though he might say that perhaps it is 5.
    
    The madman would know for sure that it is 5.
    
    The Sufi will tell you a seemingly irrelevant story (the story will be,
    in fact, irrelevant, but the mental effort you will make convincing
    yourself of its irrelevance will be very worthwhile).
    
    					Topher
969.5Hee hee!CGVAX2::PAINTERWage PeaceFri Jan 27 1989 15:1210
    Re.-1                           
    
    Topher,
    
    That was PERFECT!  (;^)  I just figured something out as a result
    of your answer.  Thank you.
         
    True elegance is simplicity. 
    
    Cindy
969.6whats the problem?USACSB::OPERATOR_CB20-20 ChaosSat Jan 28 1989 07:327
    
    RE: .0   Shoot two of the people in the room...and TELL the remaining
    one he is a Sufi.  
    
    	The other two are dead.
                      
    Craig
969.7say wha'?WAV12::CHAPLAINSat Jan 28 1989 14:453
    Ignorant as hell and proud of it!  What the hell is a Sufi?
    
    - Yeh, ME
969.8MOSAIC::HARDYSun Jan 29 1989 18:186
    Re .7
    
    See?   Told ya so!
    
    Pat
    
969.9The SufisAYOV18::BCOOKZaman, makan, ikhwanMon Jan 30 1989 07:5710
    Re.7
    
    There was a discussion a while back on Sufis and Sufism but it decayed
    regretably. If anyone's interested I'll start a new note in which
    we could share our knowledge in a constructive manner. I'm no expert
    but I'm willing to take a stab at explaining their view of the world.
    
    Anyone interested?
    
    Brian
969.10I thought it was raw fish.USWAV1::CHAPLAINMon Jan 30 1989 08:023
    re .9
    
    Go ahead. Make my day.
969.11difficult question.....IJSAPL::ELSENAARFractal of the universeMon Jan 30 1989 08:3712
RE -2 (Brian)

>                                 -< The Sufis >-
>    (...)
>    Anyone interested?
    
How can I say I am not interested until I have found out what you wanted me to
tell about Sufi? 

And how do I know that you are not telling lies, then?

Arie (;-)
969.12A Long Sufi StoryCIMNET::PIERSONMilwaukee Road Track InspectorMon Jan 30 1989 19:3134
     I have no idea if the following story is "correct", or "valid"
    in its presentation of a Sufi.  It was presented as valid, and I
    would like to know if it is.  I, too, would be interested in some
    more about Sufi.
    thanks
    dave pierson
    
    A Sufi owned a magnificent horse.  One night it ran off, and the
    next day the villagers came to express their sympathy:
    
    	"OH! What a terrible thing, to lose so fine a horse"
    they said.
    
    	"Perhaps, perhaps", said the Sufi, "It is early yet..."
    
    The following day, the horse returned, accompanied by TEN other
    horses.  The villagers gathered to congratulate the Sufi:
    
    	"OH, how wonderful", the villagers said, "Such fine horses"

      	"Perhaps, perhaps", said the Sufi, "It is early yet..."

    On the _next_ day, the Sufi's eldest son was trying to ride the
    wildest of the new horses.  He was thrown, and his leg broken.
    As word spread, the villagers came again, to express their sympathy:
    
    	"How terrible this is, such a fine son, and his leg broken."

    	"Perhaps, perhaps", said the Sufi, "It is early yet..."


    On the _next_ day, the king's men came, for he was at war, and took
    all the able bodied young men for the army....
969.13Truth and Validity?DNEAST::CHRISTENSENLTue Jan 31 1989 08:2117
The story may be true and it is typical of Sufi teaching
storys having many levels or layers of thought.  One element
of the story illustrates the difference in the Sufi mind and
the Villager's mind.

Other points might be:
was the Sufi psychic?
did the Sufi take the missing horse as a Divine sign?
did the Sufi plot this whole scenario to save his son from the draft?
was the horse the Real Sufi in this story?


At another level of understanding the story illustrates the principal of
Right Action, it illustrates the folly of foutune and mis-fortune (luck),
and it illustrates the difference between reaction and response.

L.
969.14no 'moral' hereAYOV18::BCOOKZaman, makan, ikhwanTue Jan 31 1989 08:567
    Yes, it's a fairly typical Sufi teaching story. However, where normal
    parables etc have a 'moral' to be extracted, Sufi stories are important
    only in the effect that they have on the reader. Does it change
    you/ make you more aware? Who did you like in the story and why?
    Who didn't you like in the story and why? etc etc
    
    Brian
969.15I think it might work this way...JOUST::YERAZUNISThis is _intense_!Tue Jan 31 1989 22:5719
    Back to the original question:
    
    Watch the three interact...
    
    The madmen are sure of everything and so state;
    	The fools are sure of nothing and so state;
    		The sufi are sure that the goings-on are interesting.
    
    -----or-----
    
    Ask each of them to point to the sufis:
    
    	The mandman will point to someone;
    	the fool will point to someone;
    	the sufi will point at you.
    
    
    
     
969.16Good one!AYOV18::BCOOKZaman, makan, ikhwanWed Feb 01 1989 03:295
    Re. .15
    
    I like it. Thanks.
    
    Brian
969.17GENRAL::DANIELMon Feb 06 1989 17:324
...and here I thought Sufi was the raw fish that we ate at the Yakitori 
Restaurant on Saturday nights.

If your mouth is full of rice, it's Sufi...
969.18TANIS::HARDYThu Aug 03 1989 18:5012
A man passed away, and his soul found itself approaching the Gates
of Paradise.  Suddenly, his way was barred by an angel of light.

"Prove thy worth," the angel said, "else thou shall not enter into Paradise."

"Now just a minute," the man responded.  "How do I know that this is not
really just some kind of hallucination, a delirium of my dying mind?"

The Angel was about to reply, but a loud voice boomed from beyond
the Gates of Paradise.  "Open the door!  He's one of us!"

- Sufi fable, recounted in Robert Anton Wilson's COSMIC TRIGGER
969.19sometimes I think I'm waking upFREEBE::TURNERWed Aug 15 1990 10:277
    there actually was a sufi tradition where they acted as madmen.In
    another tradition they deliberately acted in such ways as to bring
    the hatred of society upon them. Many sufi tradition are just dead
    forms,  no longer suited to modern conditions. Soooo perhaps all three
    are sufis. Or none of them. Are you awake enough to tell? 
    
    					John Turner