T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
904.1 | since you ask ... | MARKER::KALLIS | Anger's no replacement for reason | Thu Nov 03 1988 11:55 | 29 |
| Re .0 (Cheryl):
First, you might want to check note 154, "An Icy Grave for Atlantis,"
which discusses aspects of it in some detail. I was tempted to
move this note there, but since you hit on something else ...
>Ok.....yesterday I took an atlas of the world and cut out the coast
>of Africa and lined it up to the coast of South America. I had
>heard that it would line up and so it did. Is this just coincendental
>or is that more than possible that there two continents may have
>been one?
This is part of what's called the theory of "continental drift,"
which fairly recently got a boost through a relatively new discipline,
plate tectonics. The basic idea is that the continents as we know
them ate drifting apart; reversing that, there was, implicationally,
a time when they were all a single land mass. That land mass was
given a name, Gondwanaland.
Now this is _not_ the same as the Atlantis legend. First, the split
took place millions of years ago, certainly before there were any
hominids, much less humans. Second, the Atlantis legend _as it's
currently evolved_ presupposes a "continent" somewhere in the Atlantic
Ocean that housed a supertech civilization and it sank suddenly,
killing most of its inhabitants. The actual legend derives from
two Platonic dialogues, which ... but that's what Note 154's all
about.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
904.2 | Merci Buckets..! | FHQ::OGILVIE | The EYES have it! | Thu Nov 03 1988 12:09 | 22 |
|
re: .1
Thanx Steve, I had hope you wouldn't move this to #154. That seemed
to cover the history of the theories of Atlantis.
Interestingly enough, thru a trance reading (a channelled entity)
I was to have been incarnated onto a place called (and this is
phonetic): Mu-ra-Mu - a portion of Atlantis that still existed after
the shift. Somewhere near/on Africa.
I'm not asking anyone to verify the Channel's reading, but am asking
if anyone can give any input, possibly thru their own experiences
as to what this could be, i.e. similar experiences (???) and if
anyone has ever heard of a "crystal bell"....
Cheryl
p.s. this is so much easier (To ask questions) than to sit in a
library...
|
904.3 | | RAINBO::HARDY | | Thu Nov 03 1988 12:44 | 6 |
| A crystal bell is an oscillator.
Welcome.
Pat
|
904.4 | and m,ore data | MARKER::KALLIS | Anger's no replacement for reason | Thu Nov 03 1988 13:33 | 17 |
| Re .2 (Cheryl):
>I was to have been incarnated onto a place called (and this is
>phonetic): Mu-ra-Mu - a portion of Atlantis that still existed after
>the shift.
Now for a further point of literary interest. A rival "sunken
continent" hypothesis was put forward. There was supposed to be
a place called "Lemuria," which was generally put in the Pacific
Ocean. In some accounts, it predated Atlantis, and the survivors
of Lemuria migrated to Atlantis. [I guess some people never learn,
for all their ultratecherie. ;-)] Lemuria was usually shortened
to "Mu." "Mu-ra-Mu' sounds like a mixture of Mu mythos with a tyouch
of Egyptian legend (Ra [generally, but not exclusively, pronounced
with a long A] was one of the chief Egyptian deities -- a sun god).
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
904.5 | From what I remember.... | SHRBIZ::WAINE | Linda | Thu Nov 03 1988 13:36 | 18 |
| It's been awhile since I've done reading/research on Atlantis, but
this is what I remember - "off the top of my head":
It is my understanding that Atlantis used some sort of
nuclear-generators that used huge crystals in some way to generate all
of their energy. So... maybe the "crystal bell" was a name/type of one
of these generators....
I had heard that Atlantis actually underwent 3 different disasters
over a span of many thousands of years, and that it was the last
disaster that "blew it to pieces". Before the last disaster occurred,
a lot of the inhabitants had moved to the Egypt-area and the
Mexico-area. The people that had eventually caused the last disaster
are known as the "Sons of Belial" and it is said that these people
are now incarnate on this planet today, many of which are in high
political and powerful places.... (Scary thought!!...)...
Linda
|
904.6 | WOW | FHQ::OGILVIE | The EYES have it! | Thu Nov 03 1988 13:41 | 8 |
| Steve!
You have given me the "willies"!! It so appears (and I say this
according to the reading) that I had Egyptian followers. How ironic
that it is beginning to roll into itself. Possibly a circle is
being completed.
Cheryl
|
904.7 | | FHQ::OGILVIE | The EYES have it! | Thu Nov 03 1988 15:13 | 15 |
| re: .5
Gee Linda, I sure ain't in no powerful nor political arena....yet!!
HA!
Seriously....that is an interesting concept. With the few books
I have read pertaining to the possible existance of Atlantis as
well as Soul experiences that have been written about (not necessarily
documented...how could they be), Atlantis seems to be a theme of
sorts relative. It would certainly give one a very, very old soul.
More????
Cheryl
|
904.8 | Historical tid-bit. | ERLTC::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Thu Nov 03 1988 15:36 | 26 |
| RE: .4 (Steve)
The existence of Lemuria was originally proposed as a strictly
scientific theory to explain the distribution of related species,
living and fossil, in, I think, Madagascar and Sri Lanka (then
Ceylon). The similarity between the organisms at the two separated
regions, with no connecting species in the otherwise plausible
migration path of Africa and Asia, suggested the existence of a
large land mass of which the two islands would be the last remaining
outposts. The name came from the major group of animals used to
justify the connection: Lemurs (a group of primates more "primitive"
than monkeys).
The existence of such land bridges can now be shown to be very unlikely
given the very different character of the rocks which make up sea
floor and continent, while the distribution of lemurs and other
life forms can be very well explained -- even predicted -- on the
basis of plate tectonics. The two pieces of land were not "connected"
by a significant body of now sunken land, but were, rather, adjacent
in the same way as Africa and South America were.
By the way, the "fit" between Africa and South America is even better
if you use the boundaries of the continental shelf rather than the
current shore lines.
Topher
|
904.9 | ...and hundreds of 1,000's of us are back... | WRO8A::WARDFR | Going HOME--as an Adventurer | Thu Nov 03 1988 16:04 | 27 |
| re: Steve
Last night I listened to a Lazaris tape I had never listened
to before (it was actually the oldest available at one time...it
was recorded on Easter Sunday, 1979.) In it he mentions (as I think
he subsequently mentioned, but I had "forgotten") the existence
of a land mass preceding even Lemuria...he called it Lemania (I
think.) He has not talked about it, to my knowledge, other than
just mentioning it. He has talked extensively about Lemuria, however,
and I believe I've entered notes on that elsewhere. From him,
moreover, he has made it relatively clear that Lemurians did not
settle in Atlantis or anywhere else...they were too evolved for
that. In fact, they were so evolved that they simply evolved
beyond density...i.e., they ceased to be physical, and took their
continental land mass with them. What they DID do, however, was
plant crystals around the planet, which Atlantians later uncovered
and used. Only the Atlantians abused them and used them in harmful,
manipulative ways. The final civilization of Atlantis involved
nuclear energy, according to Lazaris...it was a megapolis, a city
that stretched more than 600 miles, as dense as any large city
now existing. Finally, of course, they self-destructed.
There may be things missing, but I believe that is part of
the way in which Lazaris has described it.
Frederick
|
904.10 | More geological evidence. | CTHULU::YERAZUNIS | One Gun, One Bullet, One Foot | Thu Nov 03 1988 18:07 | 9 |
| Not only do South America and Africa fit, but if you look at the
types of rock layered over each other on the supposedly-joined
coastline, you find that they (and the embedded fossil types) match
as well.
In other words, the two continents look like a multiflavor torte
that's been torn in two.
-Bill
|
904.11 | Lemuria is Mu? | ATSE::WAJENBERG | Make each day a bit surreal. | Fri Nov 04 1988 09:41 | 6 |
| I thought that, while Lemuria was supposed to be in the Indian Ocean,
the continent of Mu was supposed to be in the Pacific. As I recall, a
fellow named Churchward claimed that its existence was recorded in the
ancient inscriptions of the lost civilizations of South America.
Earl Wajenberg
|
904.12 | ...some suggested reading. | RAVEN1::PINION | Havanna Daydreaming..... | Fri Nov 04 1988 23:01 | 9 |
| Just thought I'd "chirp" in on a few books that go a little
more in detail about most everything that has been mentioned. If
I remember correctly, "The World Before" by Ruth Montgomery gives
quite a detailed account of the Atlantis/Lemuria/Mu legend. Also,
there was a small but interesting book written from the Cayce material
on atlantis. I think it was written by Hugh Lynn Cayce. I'm unsure
of the name. Hope this helps!!!
Scott
|
904.13 | | FHQ::OGILVIE | The EYES have it! | Mon Nov 07 1988 08:56 | 11 |
|
RE: ALL
If there is more to discuss, please feel free.
I simply can't get over how warm and supporting you folks can be.
I have also discovered and added a few new words to my vocabulary
within the last month. And I appreciate all of your views both
on and off-line.
Cheryl
|