T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
902.1 | | WRO8A::WARDFR | Going HOME--as an Adventurer | Tue Nov 01 1988 11:18 | 64 |
| re: .0
What an enormous question you have asked! *THAT* you have
asked it and have that much interest is perhaps the single biggest
asset that you can utilize. Congratulations for that.
I think it's a shame that so much of the planet never asks
that question and/or doesn't ever reach very far in answering or
attempting to answer it. How many answers are there? As many as
there are consciousnesses. So it is obviously up to you to make
the best choices you can (but you already know that.) Where does
one begin? You already have so no problem there.
I first got "serious" about that question in college when I
determined that I would use psychology (an elective at that time)
as a possible help in future parenthood. I became interested enough
to drop my original major and to switch to psychology. What I have
learned the past ten years virtually negates most of it...or at
least sheds it in a different light. I have a son now and often
wish that so many things I did I had done differently. There's
no reason to beat myself up for mistakes I made, however...that
was a different me "back then", a me I understand and empathize
with but don't sympathize with. So I work at forgiving myself
then and now and getting on with creating the future. The "results"
of my fatherhood (or maybe it should be "parenthood") speak well
as far as can be presently determined...but that is not as important
as the means.
The most important thing to teach your child? To love itself.
The most important thing you can do to teach that? Love yourself.
Show by example that you love, that you are loved and that you
respond to that love. Show that you love life and its "mysteries"
and complexities. Show that the world is a friendly place, not
an obstacle to be overcome. Remember that sometimes loving someone
or something is saying "no" to them. Respect your principles.
Respect their principles as they develop. You see, there is a duality
of sorts. On the one hand, you are a consciousness that is no
more valuable than it is. That side of you wants it to be a friend
on equal terms. On the other side is a responsibility which you
have agreed to to be a parent...which guides, shapes, molds thoughts
and ideas and feelings for that consciousness...at least until it
determines (as we all must) what ideas, feelings, thoughts, etc.
it wishes to have on its own (or to get back into harmony with.)
Specifically, it would be difficult to tell you what to do...each
of us has radically different criteria from the milieu in which
we grow, so it would be rather inappropriate to tell you with any
chance of precision what to do when he/she reaches for the bottle
of oven cleaner, e.g., beyond telling you that the oven cleaner
should not be drunk or toyed with. This is *your* opportunity to
take on this major responsibility. How much integrity do you have
with it? What is your intention? If you are always striving to
maintain the highest standards you can, then be content.
I think I'm starting to sound like something we've all heard
before...yet most of us ignore it (until we realize the damage
we've done or errors we've made.) So, I won't go on.
You are entering a world (that of parenthood) that will shake
you from the world you have known. Not better...just different.
Have fun with it for there are many beautiful lessons within it.
Frederick
|
902.2 | THE WAY OF THE LORD IS RIGHT | USRCV1::JEFFERSONL | HOLY GHOST POWER!!! | Tue Nov 01 1988 11:36 | 16 |
| Re:0
Bring a child up in the way that He/She shall go, and when they
get old they won't depart. A child is like a piece of software:
What ever you put in that child is going to come out. I'm not saying
that they are not going to rebel, because they are, but it will
only last for a season, then they will return. My advice to you,
is to: bring your child up in the way of the Lord Jesus Christ,
but before you teach it, (If you are not already) You must live
the life yourself. A good book to start reading in the bible, that
will help you, is the book of proverbs: it is a book of wisdom.
May the peace of our Lord and savior Jesus Christ be with you always!
LORENZO
|
902.3 | let your children keep their minds open | HYDRA::LARU | | Tue Nov 01 1988 12:27 | 5 |
| read _The Magical Child_ by Joseph Chilton Pearce for ways
to raise children without repressing their desires and capabilities for
awareness and spiritual growth.
happiness/bruce
|
902.4 | | CSC32::WOLBACH | | Tue Nov 01 1988 13:23 | 69 |
|
Wow! An invitation to explain my views on child rearing in a public
forum :-)
Seriously, the title of your note tells me that you already have a good
idea of what child rearing is all about. I'm not sure if the following
is really what you are looking for, but it may be worthwhile reading.
Remember, these are my opinions only.
This is what has worked for us:
Babies should be nurtured. Babies should be held frequently. Contrary
to popular belief, responding to an infants cry will not spoil the child.
It will teach the baby that his needs are met, thereby fostering a sense
of security. Babies (and children) should not be left to cry themselves
to sleep. I believe that a baby can never be held too much. Our son
slept with us for the first 6 months. I would not go so far as to recom-
mend this practice to others, because of rumors that infants can be crushed
or smothered.
Barring emergencies, strollers are right out. Babies should be carried
(Snugglies are nice). Strollers are so cold and impersonal. And what
kind of stimulation is a sea of legs? Being carried gives a child the
benefit of human touch, warmth, a chance to tune in to respiration and
heartbeat (a live person!). Babies are very attuned to faces.
Kids should follow their own natural rhythm for sleeping and waking.
Children of all ages should be treated with love, courtesy and respect.
Children learn best when treated in a positive, gentle manner. I do not
believe in physical punishment. I do believe in teaching children in a
positive manner. Above all, my child will be looking to me as a role
model. Kids are smart. Appeal to their intelligence, tell them WHY
particular actions are not appropriate, rather than punishing, or threatening
punishment, for misbehavior. Let children learn to avoid the act, not to
avoid the punishment.
Many children have 'imaginary' friends. In my mind, these friends are
guides, that we have trained (or been trained) not to see. Talk to your
child about these friends.
Dreams and nightmares can be very real. Again, look at it from a psychic
standpoint and help the child to deal positively with the experience.
Oddly, my son has never had 'imaginary' friends. And he has only rarely
remembered dreaming. He's never had nightmares.
Above all, be a good role model.
Basically, I've touched on the practical aspects of childrearing. I think
many of my practices contribute to development of an emotionally, mentally
and physically loving, secure and well-rounded child. Our goal was to
raise our son to be a responsible, loving and positive (that's a real key
aspect-so many child-rearing methods are negative) adult. We're half-way
there, and so far it looks very promising!
Coincidentally, today is my son's 9th birthday. Jamey is a loving, secure,
intelligent, polite and mischiveous little boy (am I a proud mom or what?).
Deborah
Congratulations! Having a child is a wonderful, fulfilling (frustrating
and tiresome!) experience. It truely is a 'blessed event'....
|
902.5 | so far so good.. | FHQ::OGILVIE | The EYES have it! | Tue Nov 01 1988 16:25 | 31 |
| RE: .0
I, too, had some of these concerns, regarding orthodox religious beliefs,
as well as the how's and why's of child-rearing. Believe me, until the
child is old enough to even know it's own name, you need not worry too much.
We have to teach them something. So I began with the "Now I lay me" and we
said our prayers every evening. The children need some sort of structure
and although we may disagree with or question some of the bible, it is the good
book and it's analogies and parables can be understood even by the most
ignorant. Good is better than bad. Simple. There is a basis.
I got particularly disturbed with the fact that children are not allowed a
quiet time in some schools, or a prayer period, so although I was not
Catholic I did enroll her into a Parochial school for 3 years. Here she
learned the basics. God, Christ, etc. She is 10 now and in public school.
I have become very "centered" recently and in my own discovering, so she is
discovering. I answer her questions about spirituality the best way I know
and hope that she will understand some day.
Love opens all doors...........
Cheryl
p.s. about 'feeling' what you are going to give birth to......looks 50/50
me ;^) ?? - they said it was a boy because of the heartbeats per/min
but lo and behold....a bouncing baby girl was born....and someone told
me once they saw my house tied up in a pink ribbon...
|
902.6 | A Hunch | SA1794::CLAYR | | Fri Nov 11 1988 14:38 | 21 |
| re: .0
This is just my intuition, but....It 'feels' to me that you
will have a child with very high moral values, dedication to working
for the salvation of mankind, and a fierce fighter as such. She
(I have the feeling it's a girl) will be almost a prototypic example
of some of the leaders of the 60's revolution. You will probably
first notice these characteristics when she is very young. As for
'how' to raise this child--you don't have to worry. You'll go through
a lot of frustration as she begins to express her strong will so
early in life, but I would guess that the only "formula" is to protect
her from time to time, encourage her explorations and her expressions
of feeling, and try not to force her to conform to society's values.
It seems you have the opportunity to present to the world, at a
time when we will most need it, a genuine force for humanity. Good
luck!
Roy
|
902.7 | Thanks for your wishes. | LEG::GURRAN | Spontaneity needs Practice | Mon Nov 21 1988 12:43 | 6 |
| Thank you all for your replies and wishes. I will let you know how things
turn out.
Thanks especially for .6 ... You took the hopes right out of my mind.
Martin
|
902.8 | Not detailed, but revelatory perhaps. | WRO8A::WARDFR | Going HOME--as an Adventurer | Mon Feb 27 1989 16:53 | 10 |
| Though I did not attend the four-day Intensive with Lazaris
that ended yesterday, my girlfriend did. She passed on to me this
little bit that came out of one of the one-on-one discussions:
...that we are responsible for three things in terms of our
children. 1. Their manners (in interacting with others)
2. Their education (responsibly doing the best we know
and 3. to teach them Self-love.
Frederick
|
902.9 | Everyone is a teacher | USAT05::KASPER | This space intentionally left blank | Tue Feb 28 1989 08:44 | 12 |
| re: .8 (Frederick)
> ...that we are responsible for three things in terms of our
> children. 1. Their manners (in interacting with others)
> 2. Their education (responsibly doing the best we know
> and 3. to teach them Self-love.
I agree but would like to add that it is possible for us to learn
these things from our children as well, sometimes in real profound
ways.
Terry
|
902.10 | Yes, but don't stay in the sandbox too long. | WRO8A::WARDFR | Going HOME--as an Adventurer | Tue Feb 28 1989 11:04 | 45 |
| re: .9 (Terry)
I agree that we *Can* learn from our children, and even
that we *Do* but not that we are responsible for doing so.
In other words, as responsible ADULTS, we are charged with
certain "duties". These do not include learning from our
children. It is a mistake, I believe, to make children out
to be great teachers somehow. They function with child
egos, which are different from adult egos (not better or worse,
just different) and can be as highly manipulative, etc. as
any adult's. That you see a certain beauty in children,
and see a lesson therein, is wonderful...but I wouldn't let
my life be "ruled" by it. It is dangerous, furthermore, to
desire returning to the child state (witness the old or getting
old in our society--who in their efforts to be young cause
major physical maladies to themselves.) What is important
is learning how to be an adult...contact with the child within
is perhaps essential, but can be done meditationally much more
effectively. This note had to do with that.
Last night I was talking to a friend on the phone with whom
I have talked before about "hanging on to parents." She has
consistently refused to "let go." As a result, she is constantly
having problems with her mother, who in the latest round told
her "I'm the mother, you're the daughter." As long as they
continue to hold those roles, trouble will always be just around
the corner. The point Lazaris was making is that those three things
are the only ones you need to be responsible for...beyond that you
do things because you WANT to, not because you HAVE to. Constantly
expecting things in return probably indicate HAVING. Freely giving
is likely to be because the person wants to do that. Parents who
take on guilt (sometimes as a result of a child's manipulation)
over the "results" of their responsible raising of their children
are doing themselves a major disservice. After the job of "raising"
them is done, wipe your hands and get going with your own life.
If the contact with the children remains, do so as adult to adult,
friend to friend. Sure, you'll always know who the biological/social
parent is/was, but that role will/should have been terminated.
One can argue this all they want...ultimately this solution is
necessary (each of us needs to be totally responsible for our
realities...as long as we have mommy or daddy or some substitute,
we cannot be.) Therefore, as a parent, we need to take the first
steps and not wait for our children to show us how.
Frederick
|
902.11 | I"m not a parent, but I see them on TV... | GENRAL::DANIEL | at least I'm not bored... | Tue Feb 28 1989 11:26 | 35 |
| >as responsible ADULTS, we are charged with
>certain "duties". These do not include learning from our
>children.
I'm not sure I agree. As people, we can all learn from one another. Each has
something to offer. Perhaps a "duty" (I'd prefer another word) for a parent is
to remember that the child is also a person and therefore has something to
offer from which the parent/adult may be able to learn. When adults take on
this kind of openness toward children, I would think it would override the "I'm
an adult and have had all of the experience and therefore know more than you do
about everything" attitude that I feel is destructive to the child's confidence
and creativity.
Children and adults are people; we can learn from each other; I think it
depends on what we perceive as the lesson.
>It is dangerous, furthermore, to desire returning to the child state
Maybe you mean something different by "the child state" than I think of when I
hear the term, so I'll change it to "the Egg". I like to think of myself as
being able to see things new, to not take things for granted (although I do
anyway sometimes; I try to be conscious of this), and to therefore be open to
what I might be able to hear or experience that is new.
>What is important is learning how to be an adult
I agree with this; I just don't think it's necessary to cut off being a child.
I think one does not necessarily preclude the other.
I agree that taking on guilt is doing the Self a disservice; however, it seems
to be a part of life; I know of no one who is guiltless all the time (I
associate guilt with regret). As for raising the child and then letting go
completely of the role of parent, I've not had the experience, but I have a
strong hunch that says it's easier said than done. As for necessary, I'm not
altogether certain that it's 100% completely necessary.
|
902.12 | Child's play? | WRO8A::WARDFR | Going HOME--as an Adventurer | Tue Feb 28 1989 11:51 | 16 |
| re: .11 MEredith
I chose my words fairly carefully/consciously. I wanted to
make it clear of what is NECESSARY, not what is DESIRABLE.
I used "duty" because I, too, am not happy with that word.
As for 100%, I said "ultimately". Again, as we set up ideals,
they are never met...they are just worked towards. We may never
be totally free of many of these things in our lifetimes (guilt,
e.g.) but that doesn't mean we don't set up ideals towards
eliminating some things or accomplishing others.
Again, I don't say we can't learn from our children, just
that we don't HAVE to.
Frederick
|
902.13 | Howdy duty | USAT05::KASPER | This space intentionally left blank | Tue Feb 28 1989 14:11 | 61 |
| re: .10 (Frederick)
> I agree that we *Can* learn from our children, and even
> that we *Do* but not that we are responsible for doing so.
> In other words, as responsible ADULTS, we are charged with
> certain "duties". These do not include learning from our
> children.
Remember, I agreed with your note (.8) but added the children
part as an additional observation. The first person we are responsible
for/to is ourselves. In everyone we meet there is potential for
learning. Particularily in first encounters since our impressions of
the individual are most likely projections of some inner part of
ourselves. We should pay close attention to these feelings and find
within where they are coming from and what this inner 'person' needs
from us. As far as duty (I don't like the word either, 'duty' is
what some folks call the stuff dog's deposit on the living room rug),
each of us has a purpose, to work towards that purpose requires learning.
It doesn't matter where or from who we learn, only that we eventually do.
Anyone can be a great teacher, including children, penniless wino's walking
the streets, parents, friends, Jesus, anyone. Sometimes from just
seeing or observing them, not necessarily having them 'preach' to us.
> It is a mistake, I believe, to make children out
> to be great teachers somehow. They function with child
> egos, which are different from adult egos (not better or worse,
> just different) and can be as highly manipulative, etc. as
> any adult's.
I don't think so, They can be teachers but no more that anyone else -
and I don't mean teacher such as an instructor, professor, guide, etc.
We can learn from their experiences and their observations. Their
perceptions are different than ours, their ego's are different but
not so tainted. The freshness in their outlook can be wonderful.
If we could believe in ourselves like children seem to believe in
theirselves, I wonder what we could do.
> I wouldn't let my life be "ruled" by it. It is dangerous, furthermore,
> to desire returning to the child state (witness the old or getting
> old in our society--who in their efforts to be young cause
> major physical maladies to themselves.)
I think you are mistaking a part of consciousness with the fear of
death that some elderly folks suffer. They are trying to hold onto
their physicality, not necessarily bring into their consciouness the
freshness of looking at life through the eyes of a child. Holding
onto anything, be it parents, youth, or a BMW can produce negative
results. Again, when we feel this we need to look inside to see
why/what we are projecting and find the real need and take care of
it.
This is from memory from "The Eyes of a Child" by the Moody Blues
that kinda says it nicely...
"In the eyes of a child, you must come out and see
Through their world spinning 'round and how life it can be,
A small part of the whole of a love that exists
In the eyes of a child you will see."
Terry
|
902.14 | No, he doesn't. | CLUE::PAINTER | Wage Peace | Tue Feb 28 1989 17:55 | 10 |
|
A friend of mine wrote to me recently that 'the greatest teachers
are also the greatest students'.
If we are all students and teachers at the same time, this is the
best of all worlds. It is only when a parent gets stuck in the
'I'm the parent and therefore I always know best and you never do'
(hm...sounds like a TV show) then it doesn't work anymore.
Cindy
|
902.15 | | GENRAL::DANIEL | at least I'm not bored... | Tue Feb 28 1989 18:28 | 8 |
|
Cindy,
Yeah! (Is this DEJAVU or what!!!!)
ha ha!
m
|
902.16 | No more time for dreams | HEAD::GURRAN | | Mon Jun 12 1989 09:34 | 21 |
| Hello again,
Just for completeness, my wife had a boy (sorry Roy.6)
on May 19th at 12:17pm BST in Reading, Berks. I know the time as my
wife had a Caesarian,and I was there.
Alexander was conceived via IVF (test-tube) and he was born 40 weeks
to the day that he was 'put back'.
I would be very gratefull if one of you astrologers out there would
do a brief chart on personality or future for him. Donations will
be made to any charity.
Does anyone have any thoughts on the implications of an assisted
conception and birth as apposed to 'natural' ones on the
spiritual/astrological development of a person ?
Thanks again for your best wishes earlier.
|
902.17 | Good news! | AIRPRT::PAINTER | Back from OZ, and the Wizard said... | Mon Jun 12 1989 13:33 | 4 |
|
Congratulations!
Cindy
|
902.18 | Request | AIRPRT::PAINTER | Back from OZ, and the Wizard said... | Mon Jun 12 1989 14:00 | 7 |
|
Re.0 (HEAD::GURRAN)
Please contact me directly - I'm trying to send a note to you offline,
however my node does not recognize yours (LEG or HEAD).
Cindy
|
902.19 | couldn't resist ... | COPA::CABANYA | | Thu Jun 22 1989 13:13 | 8 |
| ..... welll.....
Ceasar did okay ......
:-)
mary
|