T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
857.1 | Why do we have guardians? | USACSB::OPERATOR_CB | DO WHAT THOU WILT | Wed Sep 14 1988 08:41 | 34 |
|
Ill take a swing at answering this one...
I will be using an analogy that isn't great but any analogy falls
apart under...ect ect..
Q. Do you/we need protection/protectors in society/everyday life?
(Parents ect. and....pause...police? ;-})
Q. Are there individuals in society that would/could harm you if
those protectors wern't there? (mass murderers, ect)
Q. Chances are you hopefully will never use need (or run into)
this protection but arn't you more comfortable knowing the
protection is there? (that could go either way of course...but.)
Q. Are you able to function better in society and concentrate on
your day to day activities know that this protection is working/
present?
I guess the protection, in the case of opening yourself, is more
of a method of taking away the fear by imagining "guardians" around
you. This allows you to direct your energies into the task goal
you are trying to accomplish without the distraction/fear of
"beasties".
Maybe there are besties, maybe there arn't . Maybe the protection
works and maybe it is a delusion. It does seem strange that soo
many types of protection work, (prayer to God,Jesus,White Light,
Star Ruby :-), ect ect,) I guess its more the concept not the source,
unless you count yourself as the source. But Ill stop my babbling.
Hope I understood your question.
Craig
|
857.2 | Is there a bad guy? | BIGSUR::GRAFTON_JI | | Wed Sep 14 1988 12:15 | 56 |
| I appreciate your reply. Maybe my question is better phrased: Are
there evil beings out there with malicious intent from whom we need
protection? I don't feel I need to fear anything that belongs to
the All-That-Is because I wouldn't hurt myself in that way.
But first, let me answer your questions as I feel.
> Q. Do you/we need protection/protectors in society/everyday life?
> (Parents ect. and....pause...police? ;-})
> Q. Are there individuals in society that would/could harm you if
> those protectors wern't there? (mass murderers, ect)
We do have protectors in our society; that is true. As to whether
a "bad" person can *really* harm me, or not, I'm not so sure. I
can be raped, maimed, and killed, (hopefully not all three at the
same time or that would be a really bad day ;-) ) but my soul
continues to exist. So has any real harm been done? And I guess
I think the person who did these horrible things to me (my body)
has to work through his/her problems by him/herself.
> Q. Chances are you hopefully will never use need (or run into)
> this protection but arn't you more comfortable knowing the
> protection is there? (that could go either way of course...but.)
> Q. Are you able to function better in society and concentrate on
> your day to day activities know that this protection is working/
> present?
I don't know the answer to these since I have never been without
the protection.
> I guess the protection, in the case of opening yourself, is more
> of a method of taking away the fear by imagining "guardians" around
> you. This allows you to direct your energies into the task goal
> you are trying to accomplish without the distraction/fear of
> "beasties".
I can understand this because I can easily see how frightening some
of these experiences must be. For example, if I were in a plane
about to crash, I could become very "religious" in an instant.
And you would see me chanting the Lord's Prayer without a second
thought. (And I haven't said it for years!) Heaven knows what
my response would be to an entity existing on other plane who decides
to converse with me.
So are you saying that my requests for protection (Yup, I use them
but the inconsistency struck me funny) are to remove the fear of
the unknown?
Or is there something more? Are we really afraid that an evil, evil
entity has the power to divert our energies to some horrible deed?
What do you think?
|
857.3 | On the road to Nirvana. | WRO8A::WARDFR | Going HOME--as an Adventurer | Wed Sep 14 1988 12:42 | 20 |
| Hi, Jill.
I think that a distinction might be made between a reality
we allow versus one we direct. In either, especially in one that
is allowed, "evil" can and does exist for us. While perhaps at
some ultimate stage we do not experience "evil", we do at "these
levels." Do we have to? I do not think so. Do we have fear?
Definitely. Should we turn our backs on fear? No. How about
turning our back to evil? That depends...many times, yes...
no, if we aren't *sure* of how it got there because unless we
are aware of how it got there it is bound to stay or return, for
something (within us, I believe) put it there. So, while the
All-That-Is is not a danger to us, just as you say, for us on
this physical journey there are clearly hurdles standing in the
way...hurdles, incidentally, that we put there. So, until we
figure out how to *remove* the hurdles, we might want to wear
knee pads to protect our knees as we hit them.
Frederick
|
857.4 | ... asmong other things ... | MARKER::KALLIS | Anger's no replacement for reason | Wed Sep 14 1988 16:26 | 54 |
| Re .0 (Jill):
From your response in 855.19, I guess I'll have to take a stab at
responding here.
>I guess I'm working from the premise that we're all part of All-That-Is
>I'm not sure why I would need protection from something that is another
>part of All-That-Is as well.
Well, this is a good jumping-off point. Let's be completely mundane.
Using your model, if I am "part of All-That-Is," and a rattlesnake
is _also_ part of "All-That-Is," then using the logic that one part
wouldn't hurt another part, I shouldn't fear rattlesnakes.
Part of the problem is that if you accept a completely "created
reality" as your model (as in "I create my own ...") then being
in full control of your reality would _preclude_ harm, etc., unless
you "permitted" it. However, if there's an objective reality, then
you could be impacted by outside agencies anyway, whether or not
you wanted to. Actually, the _reductio ad absurdum_ of this model
is solipsism -- where you are the only reality (the entire rest
of the world is complete illusion).
The standard JudeoChristian world view posits supernatural entities,
some good, some evil, some neutral. Other religions/belief_systems
also do. In addition, and outside the purely religious context,
there are those who believe in ghosts, etc. As with non-ghostly
supernatural beings, ghosts could be good, bad, or amorally neutral.
Now suppose you want to be a "channel." This intrinsically requires
a belief in spirits (otherwise you'd be a little silly: "I don't
believe in spirits, but I'll try to channel one."). If you believe
in spirits, then you ought to consider that if they exist, they
might not all be benign (as not all critters are benign, such as
rattlesnakes); while they might not [or might!] be malefic, they
might be hostile if approached improperly. Further if there _are_
malefic ones, they might be the first in line to do harm to vulnerable
channels.
Re .2:
>I appreciate your reply. Maybe my question is better phrased: Are
>there evil beings out there with malicious intent from whom we need
>protection?
>...
>Or is there something more? Are we really afraid that an evil, evil
>entity has the power to divert our energies to some horrible deed?
The possibility exists. Think of it as "safe sex": it doesn't hurt
to take precautions. They might not be necessary, but why take
the chance? BTW: germs are also part of All-There-Is, and we [ought
to, anyway] take precautions against them.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
857.5 | If I chant, will the rattlesnake go away? | BIGSUR::GRAFTON_JI | | Wed Sep 14 1988 18:41 | 24 |
|
re: .4 (Steve)
> The possibility exists. Think of it as "safe sex": it doesn't hurt
> to take precautions. They might not be necessary, but why take
> the chance?
This response feels most comfortable: We don't know for sure, but
it couldn't hurt.
Since starting this topic, I have also been pointed to note #394
on Invisible Enemies. I'm going to read all the responses there
to see what folks think.
Because of circumstances with my husband's family, I have recently
been faced with the idea that evil, indeed, does exist. (No, they're
not evil but they relate stories of a person who may fit this
description.) The idea has been so completely foreign to me until now
that I wanted some ideas and opinions on the concept of a person
or entity being evil.
Jill
|
857.6 | more ramblings | USACSB::OPERATOR_CB | DO WHAT THOU WILT | Thu Sep 15 1988 05:44 | 32 |
|
RE: .2
Perhaps a "bad" (I hate that word) cant harm you but I am sure
it/he/she/they can disrupt your day/current project.
"Heaven knows what my response would be to an entity existing
on another plane who decides to convers with me."
Or how-bout if it just shows up for a visit?
"So are you saying that my requests for protection are to
remove the fear of the unknown?"
No, but mine are used in this fashion so that once the protection
is set up I can focus my all into what I am doing/working on.
"are we really afraid that an evil, evil entity has the power
to divert our energies to some horrible deed?
I dont know if "we" are. :-)
But I do know that I am afraid/fear that an evil entities power
would be flashy/great enough to awaken greed for power and start
a quest for individual immortality ect and tend to make me forget
The Law.
Are there "evil" beings? if there are that is their problem/choice.
Are there "good" beings? Ditto
|
857.7 | | FSLENG::JOLLIMORE | For the greatest good... | Thu Sep 15 1988 09:15 | 8 |
| .4 (Steve Kallis)
The rattlesnake is *indeed* part of 'All-that-is'. While I think you
should respect the rattlesnake, there is no need to fear it.
And yes, the entire rest of the world is complete illusion.
Jay
|
857.8 | This all a dream we dreamed one afternoon long ago... | JACOB::STANLEY | I need a miracle every day... | Thu Sep 15 1988 11:17 | 9 |
| < Note 857.7 by FSLENG::JOLLIMORE "For the greatest good... " >
>And yes, the entire rest of the world is complete illusion.
I agree. I think of it as a "physical dream". We are just the stars of
own personal dramas. All of our personal dramas overlap in an extremely
complex manner.
Dave
|
857.9 | All the world's a ... | LEDS::BATES | | Thu Sep 15 1988 22:18 | 4 |
|
And so it is indeed, from my spot on the stage...
Gloria
|
857.10 | It's all energy | NEXUS::MORGAN | Experiencing the Age of Xochipilli. | Sun Sep 18 1988 01:48 | 58 |
| Reply to .0,
Protections. Protections against what? whom? why?
Science tells us that at the lowest level everything is energy.
I'll defer to Steve, Topher and Earl to describe how this energy
gets to be seen as matter. I don't really understand the theory quite
yet.
Hence in my worldview things that are "evil" take energy from me
against my will or in a damaging, unatural way. "Good" things leave
me alone or participate in a positive, two way energy exchange.
Steve's snake could take my energy away if I place myself in an
unnecessarily risky position. The snake is not feared, but I'm
certainly not going to tempt it to natural defences.
At other levels there could be energy organizations, energy systems,
perhaps energy beings with differing grades of consciousness. I
generally operate under the assumption that they do exist. A good way
to demonstrate this is to look at the full spectrums of sound and
light. Humans only perceive a limited small part of these spectrums.
Part of the chaos theories is the theory of dissipative structures.
Basicly this theory states that in highly stressed open energy systems
the stressed energy system reorgainzes itself to the next higher step in
complexity in complete defience of the second law of thermal dynamics.
Now think of the most stressful open energy systems in the Universe.
The planet earth however small is a great demonstration of this theory.
However if the theory holds true for the planet then some really wierd
energy organizations exist within stars, star systems, neutron stars, so
called black holes, pulsars, etc. Perhaps these 'wierd' energy
organizations can exist in space, perhaps on earth. We can't see
all the way up and down the spectrum of light. We could be missing
many life forms because we aren't looking in the proper areas of
the light spectrum.
It has been specualted in the past that planets and stars are conscious
in their own way with planet and star "thinking thoughts" taking 1000s
of years.
To bring this back to the subject it is entirely possible that even
limited intelligent energy forms are created and nurtured in Nature.
Some people call these elementals, some spirits, some angels, some
demons, and still others energy beings.
And it may be that the model presented in nature is that some open
energy systems absorb other open energy systems. Bigger fish eat
littler fish.
Protections are needed, if for nothing else than for peace of mind.
Since the physical world is the most dense it seems reasonable to
think that other non-physical energy organizations are in the less
dense, more spectral realm; the realm of ghosts, of spirits, yes,
even of the Gods themselves.
|
857.11 | weell, not "fear" | MARKER::KALLIS | Anger's no replacement for reason | Thu Sep 22 1988 09:33 | 13 |
| Re .7 (Jay):
>The rattlesnake is *indeed* part of 'All-that-is'. While I think you
>should respect the rattlesnake, there is no need to fear it.
I perhaps overstated the case to make my point. Actually, I don't
_fear_ rattlesnakes (nor spitting cobras, coral snakes, anacondas,
or boomslangs), but I treat them with circumspection. Point is,
the idea of protections is to guard one against harm (I don't _fear_
a circular saw, but I might wear protective goggles while operating
one, depending on circumstances).
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|