T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
838.2 | Let's try again | USAT05::KASPER | You'll see it when you believe it. | Tue Aug 23 1988 09:35 | 8 |
| Well, let me try again....
Try reading _The Tibetian Book of the Dead_. I understand it is a good
reference for post-death experiences.
Terry
|
838.3 | | SHRFAC::ADAMSM | | Tue Aug 23 1988 10:29 | 13 |
| .0...........
You're not alone. I get lost in this stuff myself. Interseting,
yes, definable, no way. For every weird thing that happens you'll
get a hundred explanations ranging from devil spirits to little
green men from outer space. What "moves the puck around the board"..
spiritual communication through medium or the nerves in your hand?
I take a very objective view of all this with a small dose of
skeptisism. A larger dose and I wouldn't bother reading this
conference. I *do* believe the personal name in .1 says it all:
When you believe it, you'll see it. My personal experience with
a spirit (824 I believe) chronicals a skeptic turned believer in
that with every occurance my belief increased and vice versa.
|
838.4 | | SSDEVO::YOUNGER | Heisenburg might have been here | Tue Aug 23 1988 17:27 | 18 |
| Re .0
Anyone who claims to have an easy answer to your questions is probably
wrong or at least short-sighted.
What happens after death? There are lots of theories. In addition
to the Tibetian book of the Dead, I would reccomend reading _Life
after Life_ and _Life Before Life_. I don't remember the author
of either of these books.
I happen to believe that there is a place of rest and repose that
spirits are supposed to go to after death before their next
incarnation. Some people may be tied to this world for a time.
As for the Ouija, it could be one of these dead stuck here, it could
be some other entity, or it could be the people using the Ouija
board. That's what I don't like about Ouija - too many unknowns.
Elizabeth
|
838.5 | So many theories, so little proof... | SEINE::RAINVILLE | The best view is close to the edge! | Wed Aug 24 1988 00:40 | 9 |
| I believe Science and its' close VooDoo ally, Engineering, provide tools
useful to predict nature & provide basic necessities of life. But, some of
our vaunted technology is sifted from 'superstitious' ideas & observations.
Taken to extremes, excessive control of nature damages life. Adherents to
yesterday's science are like apostles of discredited religions. Ignoring
information which doesn't fit our preconceptions, risks passing up chances
to increase comprehension and grow. Taking everything at face value, doesn't
develop discrimination or balanced growth. Consider all evidence & reports,
but be critical. Todays' spirituality may be tomorrows' physics. ;-) MWR
|
838.6 | Illusions? | SEINE::RAINVILLE | Qualified Speed Bump! | Wed Aug 24 1988 01:33 | 10 |
| But seriously, .0, I notice some culturally ingrained unproven
assumptions about spirituallity in your question. In terms of
absolute proof, the theory that the body is inhabited by a soul
at all is no more tenable than the theory that we are purely
mechanistic constructs having all the appearances of a soul with
the presumption of free will. If in fact a seperable 'soul' exists,
we have no real proof that it has an individual existence apart
from some vast pool of spiritual absolute other than its' temp-
orary residence in some corporeal entity....MWR
|
838.7 | The Answer is blowing in the Wind... | VIDEO::SU | | Wed Aug 24 1988 18:24 | 10 |
| Think of it is way -
"You are not this body
you are not this mind
you are the Spirit..."
Unfortunately, most of the noters prefer in pursuit the dead Spirit
and choose to neglect the living Spirit. Therefore, the separation
of body/mind and Spirit continues on despite the teach of many great
incarnation from the past.
|
838.8 | ? | FNYADG::PELLATT | Just what is it with Turkey ? | Thu Aug 25 1988 03:46 | 8 |
| >> Unfortunately, most of the noters prefer in pursuit the dead Spirit
>> and choose to neglect the living Spirit. Therefore, the separation
Any chance you could expand on what you mean by this, er "interesting"
statement ?
Dave ( a living Noter )
|
838.9 | "the answer has blown out your mind" :-) | USACSB::OPERATOR_CB | the khabs is inside the khu | Thu Aug 25 1988 03:52 | 33 |
|
RE: .0
Hi Cheri,
I think that the "theory" that you are asking about will lead to
different answers everytime you ask it.
> "I cant understand most of it."
Join the club! Most of us (I guess i would draw flack if I said
all.) will be in this state till we croak untill then we just go
on "belief"/"emotion".
> "...and goes on to the next plane. Then what happens to it?"
Again I must say that if you ask 10 people you will get 100
answers. No one really "KNOWS" they may strongly "BELIEVE".
Thats why there are so many different Religions, Beliefs, and Wars.
> "I just wish I understood more!"
I wish I could delete my need to understand! But your not alone...
just enjoy the reading, ask questions, and in no time you'll be
filled with big words, amazing stories, untold knowledge, and be
as confused as ever. :-) :-)
Then maybe you'll find a way of thinking that makes everything
fit together for YOU, (if you havn't already!) and maybe you can
be "The Just And Oblique Crusader!!" and call everyone else confused
and ignorant! ;-)
Hope this didn't add to your confusion!
Craig
|
838.10 | | WILLEE::FRETTS | Love our Mother Earth | Thu Aug 25 1988 09:20 | 9 |
|
Cherie,
I entered some information in note 8.14 outlining one perspective
of the different planes we exist on. It might be of interest to
you.
Carole
|
838.11 | Thanks... | LAGUNA::RACINE_CH | | Thu Aug 25 1988 16:12 | 23 |
|
Craig,
It's always nice to know that I'm not the only one wondering about
this stuff, and that alot of the terminology goes flying over the
heads of others!
and re .10 (Carole):
Thanks for the reference!
and thanks to everyone who's responded. I know there are no definite
answers to my questions, but I thought maybe someone could help
me clarify things. Now I see that most of the noters here each
have their own beliefs, etc., which makes it very hard to define
things. That's fine, eventually I'll get well-versed enough to
make a few decisions, too!
Regards,
Cherie
|
838.12 | Buzzing on caffeine? | WRO8A::WARDFR | Going HOME--as an Adventurer | Thu Aug 25 1988 16:45 | 18 |
| re: Cherie
re: Cherie, I like that. :-) (Reminds me of Stevie Wonder)
If you believe what you wrote, then I'd say you succeeded in
discovering a valuable lesson. Yes, it does appear (from my
vantage point as well) that reality is indeed subjective AND
there is not always an easy answer.
I've put these things in here before but I feel like putting
them in here again: (from Lazaris)
"Reality=(Beliefs + Emotions) multiplied by Imagination."
also, "metaphysicians are not the ones with all the answers,
they are the one with many solutions."
Frederick
|
838.13 | ! | RAINBO::SU | | Mon Aug 29 1988 11:48 | 17 |
| re. - .8
The truth, the reality is always hard for human being to face it.
Our free will - the freedom of choice always want to lead us to
the easy pass or the fun pass.
By "dead Spirit", I mean the spirit from a dead person; for instance,
the Spirit Channeling, Ouija board, psychic, witchcraft...to name
a few are all dealing with the dead spirit. They all lure you to
the past and the future - away from the present where we belong
to.
I believe most of the noters in Dejauv are the seeker, seeker of
the truth. We are the seeker of the reality - searching the meaning
of life (this life - the present one). Without discretion, we all
play into the hands of the unknown dead spirits.
|
838.14 | Do people with brown eyes see differently? | WRO8A::WARDFR | Going HOME--as an Adventurer | Mon Aug 29 1988 12:25 | 15 |
| re: -.1
Well, if the information we obtain can be taken for the
truth it is said to be, then *All* the entities we communicate
with are NOT dead spirits. In other words, while many may
be entities who were formerly in bodies, there is nothing to
indicate that all of them were (nor conversely, for that matter.)
People have repeatedly stated that we should all proceed with
caution. I think that is good advice, no matter what it is in
reference to; at least until one has developed the trust necessary
to sustain impeccable focus.
Frederick
|
838.15 | Can a Spirit be dead ? | FNYHUB::PELLATT | Just what is it with Turkey ? | Mon Aug 29 1988 13:16 | 18 |
| Re .13
Good point but...
Just because a Spirit / Soul is not currently incarnated ( certain such
as Lazaris et al *MAY* have passed beyond the level at which they need
to do this ) does not necessarily make it's message any less relevant
to our current lifetimes.
I agree with you that some 'seekers' may delve deep into blind alleys
by gazing into past or future through these means, but from what I've
read in this conference, most of us here *are* questing for *current*
truths, relevant and applicable to the present.
Dave.
P.S. There is quite a body ( no pun intended ) of opinion suggesting
that time is just an illusion anyway... (8^)
|
838.16 | How about a living spirit? | VIDEO::SU | | Mon Aug 29 1988 15:23 | 19 |
| The truth is not meant for you to believe or not believe but you
can experience it through you center nerve system. The truth is
not meant for you to understand through your mental level. This
is one main reason why Christ was preaching to the non-intellectual
instead of the educated individual. A truth will not change through
the age or social circumstances. You do not need a lot of money
in order to acquire that truth neither. Here, let me stress that
our human brain is so little used despite the size of it. By going
out and search for it, you will not achieve the knowledge of God.
If you are really interested at what kind of special person you
are, you can go on to note #401.7 - A Unique Discovery. I think
everyone owns him/herself an experience. And, you centainly deserve
the best in this world.
|
838.17 | Taking exception | SSDEVO::YOUNGER | Heisenburg might have been here | Wed Aug 31 1988 00:36 | 11 |
| RE .13
>the Spirit Channeling, Ouija board, psychic, witchcraft...to name a few
>are all dealing with the dead spirit.
Spirit channeling, and sometimes Ouija boards indeed with dead spirits.
Psychic phenomenon are probably a manifestation of human brains, and
often deal with the present. (Topher?). Witchcraft is not a means for
dealing with the dead - it is a religion.
Elizabeth
|
838.18 | dead applies only to the physical | ULTRA::LARU | put down that ducky | Wed Aug 31 1988 14:13 | 17 |
| re: < Note 838.13 by RAINBO::SU >
-< ! >-
� By "dead Spirit", I mean the spirit from a dead person; for instance,
� the Spirit Channeling, Ouija board, psychic, witchcraft...to name
� a few are all dealing with the dead spirit. They all lure you to
� the past and the future - away from the present where we belong
� to.
"dead spirit" seems oxymoronic.
It seems to me that "dead" is being used with a negative connotation.
I think "dead" applies only to physical bodies that are no longer
functioning.
Only each individual can decide where s/he belongs. Lessons
are everywhere to be learned.
|
838.19 | !! | RAINBO::SU | | Wed Aug 31 1988 16:49 | 6 |
| RE: .18
You are right. May be the definition of "dead Spirit" should be
"the soul which left a dead physical body"?
As long as you are still in control, I suppose.
|