T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
590.1 | Martha & Mike & David & Kate | SEINE::RAINVILLE | See you in the recent future! | Sun Dec 06 1987 20:57 | 13 |
| It used to be that when I was down, she would be up, and always
balnce me. Now that we are four, she and I have no energy left
to get excited about being up or down. David at five and Katie
at four are quite excited enough for all of us about being here.
As we watch our energy flow to them, their awareness expand and
their capabilities increase, we feel complete. I expect a time
when their interests take them else where and we will return to
the ups and downs of being just us, but this parnership of four
will endure over time and distance. And maybe grow.....I hope.
MWR
|
590.2 | I've heard about it too | FLOWER::JASNIEWSKI | | Mon Dec 07 1987 11:04 | 12 |
|
Any world of duality, or separateness, is created in our own
minds, in a vain attempt to attain the goal of happiness and
satisfaction, through our subject - object manipulations. By openly
communicating all of our thoughts and feelings to one another, we
soften our hard wired illusions of self-separateness. By dropping
expectations, as you said in .0, and fully accepting someone
"unconditionally" we can learn to accept ourselves and whatever
happens, here and now.
Joe
|
590.3 | | WAGON::DONHAM | Born again! And again, and again... | Tue Dec 08 1987 11:13 | 15 |
|
Pretty words, pretty concept. *SO HARD* to do! Sometimes I think
that the wounds I've suffered along the way aren't worth it...letting
go can be _terribly_ painful. Most of the time it hasn't worked
out, one of us had to cling even more tightly, and the relationship
has withered from the strangulation. The next step seems to be bitter
disappointment, then anger. Such a pity! to see a wonderful love
turn into a hideous thing.
I keep trying. I know that someday I'll find a partner, a REAL partner,
not just a bedmate for a season or two. Then I'll let you know if
it's been worth it.
Tananda
|
590.4 | retribalize | SSDEVO::ACKLEY | Aslan | Tue Dec 08 1987 12:27 | 30 |
|
I believe its possible to have the true partnership, but
very difficult in today's world. The relationship just
doesn't usually happen in total isolation. We need to heal
all the bonds between people, not only male / female bonds.
The healing I envison would be a "retribalization" of humanity,
when we begin to live together again, admitting our interdependence.
The modern breakdown in marriages, goes along with the trend
toward living alone, with shortages in one bedroom apartments,
and few people willing to care for the aged or the young. I
have sometimes wondered if the main lesson we have igonored, here
in America, is that we *are* interdependent. Although I am very
much an individualist, I sometimes wonder if pursuit of individuality
has not gone too far in our age. I believe there are hard times
coming which will force many of us to relearn hard lessons about
cooperation and dependency.
I hope that coming generations may find a social environment
where deep and stable relationships are more possible, and are
supported by society. I think that "true love" or "soulmate"
relationships could be the norm, rather than the rarity they
are today. That so much hard work is required to sustain a
loving relationship, is, I believe, a reflection of the
difficult times we are living in.
Guard the love you have found, for there is nothing more
precious.
Alan.
|
590.5 | Freedom | CLUE::PAINTER | Imagine all the people... | Tue Dec 08 1987 13:46 | 13 |
|
My true friends (and even 'friend' family members) over the many years
have been those who let me be me. They understand when I don't write to
them as often as I should or call or visit. And when we are reunited,
it is a celebration. These are the people in my life I cherish
most of all, and I try my best to treat them in the same way.
On 'expecting' - I do agree to a point. When there is any abuse
involved (mental or physical) though, then it is right to expect the
basics of life, liberty, dignity, respect and the right to live
a life of happiness. Somewhere there is a fine line.
Cindy
|
590.6 | Sharing for love | DUNE::GALLAGHER | Gallagher | Wed Dec 09 1987 17:18 | 34 |
|
-< Expect higher love and it will be yours >-
Personally, I'm here lookin' for that euphoric "seesee"
(that's a seesaw that only goes up).... or would that be
a "sawsaw"... no I think "seesee" must be right!!!!!!!!!
All seriousness aside...
.0
I agree...but the sharing of experiences isn't the bottom
line. Learning from one another for spiritual growth is!!!
Forcing your beliefs on someone else is definately the worst
thing any of us can do to each other. Sharing those beliefs
is the way we all learn and grow. I like the phrase used in
.1 "UNCONDITIONAL LOVE". I strongly believe that none of us,
because of our human nature, can even image what true
unconditional love is. In short my definition of this love
is the love of our creator, not jealous, not possessive, not
any of those limiting adjectives we all have attached to our
definitions of love. My bottom line (purpose for being here)
is the endless desire to understand how to love unconditionally.
Being there will be my eternal rest!
Sharing knowledge and experiences is definately a good way to
get there! To do this we all have to know how to listen as
well as speek!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
8^{*********************
ed
|
590.7 | On Unconditional Love | MANTIS::PARE | What a long, strange trip its been | Thu Dec 10 1987 11:08 | 13 |
|
It's the *act* of loving that really counts though,... not just
an understanding of it. There is no reason why we humans can't
practice "unconditional love" within the framework of our lives.
Nothing stops us but us. Its difficult and challenging but I believe
its a kind of initiation process and that once one has "actually"
experienced this kind of love, one changes and moves to a different
level of some kind. To love unconditionally means that one does
not think much about whether one is being reasonable, intelligent,
fair, or rational about that emotion one is expressing. One loves
not for the rewards (emotional or material) but for the sake of
love alone... because its the kind of person one chooses to be.
|
590.8 | Book recommendation | SCOPE::PAINTER | Imagine all the people... | Thu Dec 10 1987 14:40 | 5 |
|
There is a book entitled "Unconditional Love" by John Powell, S.J.,
which I highly recommend. It is small - 40 paperback pages or so.
Cindy
|
590.9 | Another Book Rec. | KYOMTS::COHEN | BOB | Thu Dec 10 1987 15:15 | 6 |
| "The Art of Loving" by Erich Fromm is quite interesting as well.
....Bob
|
590.10 | | SNOC01::MYNOTT | | Thu Dec 10 1987 20:00 | 5 |
| And any of the Jerry Jamblowsky (sp) books - Love is Letting Go
of Fear, Teach only Love and Goodbye to Guilt. Fun to read as well.
...dale
|
590.11 | I can say it | FLOWER::JASNIEWSKI | | Fri Dec 11 1987 10:30 | 10 |
|
Re .7
"Unconditional Love" is the basis of at least one kind of
philiosophy. I can explain the "kind of level" one changes and
moves to, if you'd like. I'm very happy to spread this kind of
thinking around!
Joe Jas
|
590.12 | the man who hugs the world... | GNUVAX::BOBBITT | a collie down isnt a collie beaten | Fri Dec 11 1987 11:37 | 5 |
| and almost anything by Leo Buscaglia restores my faith in human
nature...
-Jody
|
590.13 | elaborate | SPMFG1::CLAYR | | Fri Dec 11 1987 14:44 | 9 |
|
re: .11
Yes, please elaborate on the levels that one moves to in unconditional
love.
Roy 8:}
|
590.14 | Now that you mentioned it | BARAKA::BLAZEK | A new moon, a warm sun... | Mon Dec 14 1987 19:26 | 14 |
| When I think of unconditional love I think of the love which
exists in my family. No matter what I've done in my life my
actions have always been (eventually) accepted and forgiven.
And this is the love that I seek in all aspects of my life! I
have experienced this type of love with only one other person,
and I give thanks every time I think of him that he is in my
life. He allows me to be *me* with no reprisals or "I told
you so's" even if he doesn't agree with what I am doing. And
Tananda (.3), in my experience the pain I went through before
this time was worth the beauty of *now*.
Carla
|
590.15 | So what is it, really? | NATASH::BUTCHART | | Tue Dec 15 1987 10:51 | 35 |
| I suspect I have very little (practical, everyday) idea of what
"unconditional love" truly means. This doesn't mean I have no love
at all in my life, but it does mean (for me) that I was never loved
unconditionally. As an eldest child, my parents' love was very
much based on how I performed. This experience has probably led
to an improper understanding of what "unconditional" truly means.
I infer that I don't understand its meaning because my own attempts
at the practice of such a love have not brought the feelings of
spiritual or emotional completion everyone describes, but of depletion.
Shel Silverstein's piercing little children's book _The_Giving_Tree_
describes the pain of that kind of experience. The tree in the
story loves a little boy, and allows him over the years to chop
her apart, taking from her the things he desires, (her leaves, her
fruit, her branches, her trunk) until she is left a dead stump.
In my 20's I was especially drawn to the idea of unconditional love,
and wanted very much to practice it. It was so different from what
I'd experienced.
But after happily and diligently (if ignorantly) practicing what I
hoped was unconditional love through the years, I woke in my 30's
feeling like a dead stump. Nothing left to give, even to myself.
This has persisted for a good many years. On the days when I feel
like my "old self" I catch flashes of vision of myself clad in a
white robe with a cornucopia, joyfully distributing plenty of all
kinds to all those I care for, glowing at their happiness, grateful
that they are exactly who they are, expecting nothing else. Those
days are all too few; one day of joyful cornucopia-hood brings on
half a month dead stump-hood.
So what is true "unconditional love" anyway and how does it really
work? :-(
Marcia
|
590.16 | a journey, not a destination | GNUVAX::BOBBITT | a collie down isnt a collie beaten | Tue Dec 15 1987 11:41 | 14 |
| Oh, Marcia
can we take up a collection of warmth to provide you with the sunshine,
spring rain, and nutritious fertilizer for the soul to flourish again?
unconditional love is, indeed, an ideal. It seems much to me like
perfection - being a process rather than a final goal.
-Jody
one thing I've seen in several notesfiles - a milder version of
the same - unconditional like.
|
590.18 | | MANTIS::PARE | What a long, strange trip its been | Wed Dec 16 1987 10:00 | 13 |
| Paul,
Unconditional love is not restricted to spouses. Nor is it something
that sort of comes upon one... like puberty_:-). Love is a deliberate
act, a committment. If the opportunity to love unconditionally
presents itself in one's life, one might find it a very enlightening
experience to try it. It doesn't necessarily last forever, nothing
does... but to be loved unconditionally for awhile, or to love
unconditionally for even awhile changes a person forever. It means
getting involved to a very great degree of committment in the life
of someone who may possible be a stranger to you. It means continuing
on in the face of your own intellect and defenses screaming to stop
in your own mind. I think its an initiation of sorts.
|
590.19 | Reciprocity | NATASH::BUTCHART | | Wed Dec 16 1987 11:44 | 86 |
| Thank you, Paul, for your comment. This wonderful topic has given
me much opportunity to clarify thoughts I have on partnership, and
I can be a little clearer than I was a few replies back. These
are the thoughts that have been slowly developing over the past
two years.
I do not have unconditional love in my life. This does _not_ mean
I do not have partnership in my life. I have what I consider quite
close to a true partnership with my spouse. What are the features
of this partnership?
o each of us has the freedom to be who we are completely and
attempts never to hinder the other's being;
o each of us, on a very deep level considers the other more
important than anything else;
o each of us studies what backing we may give to the other and
then tries to give it, even if we are on different growth paths;
o each of us is free to contribute equal ideas to the continuing
growth of our union;
o each of us practices respect, kindness, forgiveness, charity,
love and with each other at all times, especially when the
other is down and out; definitely trying to live the "do as
I would be done to" maxim.
When I look at this list it seems pretty damn good; I _feel_ good
about these things!
But there is a condition. I call it Reciprocity. In my feeling,
true partnership, two people treating each other as equals of matching
worth and respect, implies that each person (whatever form or purpose
the partnership takes) strives for that balance of giving and receiving
in full measure to and from each other, and in order to do so, is
willing to lay all his/her cards on the table, and acknowledge that
the cards on the other side are just as valuable as (not more nor
less than) one's own. I now call this idea a "condition of
commitment" (thanks, Mary, for the idea that loving implies a
commitment) and without it, I don't feel true partnership is possible.
Because I have been in situations, primarily good friends and close
family, where I "loved unconditionally", by which I mean that no
matter what a person did, no matter how they behaved towards me
or anyone else, I loved them, forgave them, nurtured them, supported
them, gave them what they desired from me. Now, these were commitments
on _my_ part; but they were not partnerships because no similar
commitment existed on their parts.
What did happen instead? Mostly, two interrlated things, both of
which, ironically, strove for a balance in the relationship:
(1) I gave and loved unconditionally, and the other person inter-
preted this to mean that I was taking care of being the "good"
person in the relationship, so that in order to achieve
balance, (s)he could act like a complete jerk. The more I
loved, forgave, and supported, the worse (s)he acted towards
me.
(2) I gave and loved unconditionally precisely because I felt
unworthy and evil, damaged spiritual goods as it were, and
hoped by practicing this discipline to redeem myself. I
would love and forgive and support the other person, and act
like a complete jerk towards myself. And when I eventually
found myself too depleted to do it anymore, I interpreted
this as proof of my basic unworthiness, and vowed to try all
the harder--except that dead stump-hood had set in.
The combination of these two factors made all kinds of relationships
(friends, lovers, family, working) miserable. Fortunately, my
relationship with my spouse taught me a lot, precisely because it
has felt so good. But he has conditions! I have conditions! If
I were a person who displaced anger, for instance, by coming home
and shredding him to pieces, he would have been gone years ago. If
he were a person who did the same to me, _I_ would have been gone
years ago!
What I have begun to try saying, *out loud*, to other people
(especially family members) is: "I commit to love and support you
to the limit of my being, _AND I EXPECT IDENTICAL TREATMENT FROM
YOU_." And all of these relationships, as I make these first tentative
steps, even the most damaged, have begun to mend, to become more
reciprocal. More like--partnerships.
Marcia
|
590.20 | Not Unconditional Acceptance | GRECO::MISTOVICH | | Wed Dec 16 1987 14:09 | 31 |
590.21 | Well said. | CLUE::PAINTER | Imagine all the people.... | Wed Dec 16 1987 15:29 | 109 |
|
RE.20 Mary
You have put it beautifully.
My own story:
Up until last May, there were these sorts of people in my life (Peck's
'People Of The Lie' topic). For the life of me, no matter what
I did, it was never good enough in their eyes. I saw myself reflected
in their eyes and the reflection was very painful. If you tell
a child (or an adult, for that matter) for so long that they are
no good, worthless, ungrateful, etc., a person who is genuinely
trying to grow in their own right and thereby willing to take such
"constructive criticism" (and I use the term sarcastically) to change
their behavior accordingly will be open and vulnerable to any feedback,
be it constructive or (in my case) destructive. Such a person is
usually the ultimate victim and the punching bag ready and open to be
abused both psychologically and sometimes physically.
Through reading Peck's books, I finally realized that it wasn't
my own reflection in their eyes, but rather their own inability to
face that part of themselves which they couldn't stand and they
transferred their own self-hate onto me and others rather than accept
responsibility for their lives and work at growing in their own
right.
The cycle finally broke when I took a chance and trusted someone
with one situation (in this case it was a work situation). This
person (a senior manager who I'd known for many years) was not only
shocked at what had been going on, but went out of his way to help
me get past all that and to get on with my career. You see, the
manager I was working for was accusing me of all sorts of things
- 'not being a team player' was one of them. I found this difficult
to accept and told him so (especially due to the fact that I had
implemented a worldwide program without ever having travelled outside
of the country). Then on top of that he would reply with "There, you
can't even take constructive criticism! You have an attitude problem
to boot!". For the better part of 3 years I "thought it was me",
and carried that for a very long time. Then finally I spoke with
the senior manager (who is in one of the countries I worked with
on the project). He made me see that while it 'wasn't me', it wasn't
really my manager's fault, per se, either, and explained to me some
of the history of the organization at that point. I found out that
my manager was really the one who was not a team player because
he wasn't capable of 'networking' in the way that I was (and was
envious of my ability to effectively communicate - *that* was an
interesting revelation), and also that he had gotten a raw deal by
many of his past managers who he'd worked for by getting passed over.
So he took it out on me.
The senior manager who helped me is now a very close friend of mine.
Though he has never said it, I know for certain that he loves me,
because only a truly loving person would have done what he did.....and
he would do it for anyone in the same spot. For the very first time
in many years, I saw myself in a good light and the harsh feelings
from the past that I had carried simply melted away with the
understanding of what had really gone on. I took this knowledge and
applied it to all the people in my life who had ever caused me undue
pain and recognized the lack of love in their lives. The patterns
were the same. Realizing this doesn't make the pain go away, but
through understanding comes the ability to see things in a clearer
light (and made me see that it really wasn't "all my fault").
It was interesting - I began to write to my friend, and he sent
back many apologies because he just didn't have the time to correspond
appropriately. I managed to let him know that our friendship was
not based on a letter-for-letter exchange and that there are no
strings attached. So now I write him once a week and he writes
me 3 times a year. Works out just fine. That is what 'unconditional'
really means - NO conditions, save that of respect and kindness
on both sides of the relationship.
I also discovered this thing that keeps cropping up called 'personal
power'. When you place yourself in the hands of another who is
not capable of giving you constructive feedback which stems from
love and the desire to help you grow as a person separate from
themselves, then the image you see of yourself is distorted. This
is what is meant by the 'sins of the father passing through the
generations'. To break the cycle takes an immense strength, fortitude
and the drive to be the best you can be despite all odds. Depending
on the amount of abuse will determine how much strength (and love)
it will take to overcome an abusive past. Some people never grow up.
Peck writes that evil people are defined as those people who stunt
the growth of others, and that the most difficult thing to come
to terms with is evil in one's parents.
At this point, there are only 2 people in my life that I will accept
feedback from without question because I know absolutely that they
love me unconditionally to such a degree that they would suffer
greatly over how to tell me something that I need to improve on.
One is the person I wrote about above, and the other is a college
friend who I've been through the best and the worst in my life with.
As for everyone else, there are all sorts of levels of trust depending
on how well a person knows me and what their motives really are
in the end. The trick is to figure out early on if a person is
acting out of love and a genuine interest of your growth or if they
are merely reflecting (transferring) their distorted view onto you.
Peck's books helped me to work through that and knowing how this
all works has helped me immensely.
It is written that a true friend is one who loves you in spite of
yourself (or someone who knows your faults, yet loves you anyway).
I've found lots of friends right here in DEJAVU. Hi y'all! (;^)
Cindy
|
590.23 | Unconditional love comes from self realization. | 30841::GUEST_TMP | HOME, in spite of my ego! | Thu Dec 17 1987 01:09 | 36 |
| I will refer you to note 358.27 which briefly covers some
definitions of LOVE and to note 358.32 which also briefly covers
the concept of UNCONDITIONAL love.
It has been a great relief for me to discover that we are
*essentially* incapable of unconditional love. Having heard
that I should be doing that most of my life, it has always been
a source of anxiety to find out why I (and everyone else, for that
matter) never seemed to "cleanly" love unconditionally. Even as
late as 1981, when I spent two days with Ken Keyes, I felt that
I should be showing unconditional love. Thanks to Lazaris, about
a year or two later, I have learned that we simply are not
unconditional "lovers." Virtually all of our associations have
conditions on them. Marcia was very open about sharing her
experiences...and they underscore this point. What unconditional
love IS, though, is a goal, an ideal, that we need to strive for
but, like all ideals, not necessarily *expect* to achieve. As I
looked carefully at some of these last few replies which expressed
unconditional love, I was able to verify (for myself) that what
was being called unconditional love is not truly that. There is
an acceptance, yes, and very much a desire (hidden) for change.
There is also an undercurrent of resentment, not love. Should
you (we) feel guilty over this? NO! That's the point. NO, again,
do not expect to feel unconditional love...just work to attain it.
As for me, with as much honesty as I have, I will tell you
unabashedly that the only unconditional love I have truly sensed
has been from Lazaris. Additonally, I have more subtlely sensed
unconditional love from *aspects* of myself while in meditation.
Beyond that, I believe that all the remainder of my life's experience
has felt a great deal of varying degrees of love, but not
unconditionally.
For an incredible, deep, profound and complex set of information,
I urge you to listen to the Lazaris video tape entitled "Unconditional
Love". It will probably assist a great many of you.
Frederick
|
590.24 | a discovered note and comments | HPSCAD::DDOUCETTE | Tis the Season and Spice of life | Thu Dec 17 1987 09:33 | 20 |
| I was rumaging through my briefcase last night and found the following
on a piece of paper, I'm not sure where it came from but I think
it's apropriate.
True love is not expressed by words, but by a sparkle in the eyes,
a caressing touch, a smile expressed for no special reason. To
say "I love you" only confirms what has been said with every expression
I make towards you.
-----
Unconditional love comes from within. I believe that people can
love unconditionally, as long as they believe they can. Unconditional
love isn't something that you can force yourself to do. It's something
that grows from within. Accepting people for what they are, believing
in their hopes and dreams. Understanding that you can't change them,
they can only change themselves. This is the seeds that grows into
unconditional love.
Dave
|
590.25 | | MANTIS::PARE | What a long, strange trip its been | Thu Dec 17 1987 10:01 | 22 |
| Note 590.22
You are right about those conditions of "respect and kindness" Paul. That
is certainly not unconditional love. The blackmail issue isn't really a
problem though... you see, unconditional love is not defined by the beloved.
So one can love unconditionally and still not do everything someone else wants
them to do... because love is not obedience.
Tough love doesn't even come remotely close to unconditional love. Tough love
means I'm doing this for your own good and my own good... its what *I* feel is
best for you. It is a matter of control (in my opinion). Unconditional love
doesn't try to control or dominate.
When I said that it does not come upon one like puberty (:-) I ment that it is
not a quality that must be present in all love relationships. Some loving
relationships are ment for our own personal growth and emotional development.
On the other hand, love can be a concious choice. Unconditional love is
freely given with no expectations of anything in return. One loves regardless
of the consequences to oneself. One somehow separates the act of loving from
the self's need for gratification. One loves because one chooses to love.
|
590.26 | | AKOV11::FRETTS | you are a shining star... | Thu Dec 17 1987 10:28 | 30 |
|
I guess I have some confusion about unconditional love. There have
been those very rare few moments in my life when I've experienced
*something* that I think I can label unconditional love. But it
was a feeling that is very difficult to put into words. It has
never happened when I've been in a one-to-one interaction with
someone.
I have had these rare feelings come over me when I've been walking
down the street and have thought of all the people around me and
their struggles and then I am totally filled with an incredible
feeling for love for all of them *but it has nothing to do with
the personality they are expressing through in this life*. It has
to do with their essence and mine - that part of us which is
connected. Somehow I feel that when we are at the level of
personality we are not experiencing unconditional love.
I have also had this feeling about people I know and love, and of
those I have problems with and dislike, but only when I am alone
and allow myself to connect to them beyond the everyday crap that
can get in my way. It is extremely powerful.
This is not to say that I don't express affection, caring and love
with people one-to-one. It's just that when we are together and
our egos and personalities mix, I can't in honesty say that the
feelings we share are *totally* unconditional.
Carole
|
590.27 | Results of last evening's pondering | CLUE::PAINTER | Imagine all the people..... | Fri Dec 18 1987 11:22 | 17 |
|
After giving this some thought....
I probably was mixing unconditional love and true partnership together
when I mentioned 'respect and kindness'.
I believe that it is possible to love unconditionally (at some level),
however in the case of a true partnership, this love must be
intertwined with respect and kindness or a true partnership would
not be possible.
On unconditional love being a goal - yes, it is something that we
must strive for as opposed to thinking we are already there, because
the paradox is that if we think we are, then we're not. "Mister
God, This Is Anna" has a good section on this.
Cindy
|
590.28 | A slightly different view | CLUE::PAINTER | Imagine all the people..... | Fri Dec 18 1987 11:31 | 24 |
|
On 'giving and receiving' - the one area I haven't seen mentioned
is 'giving' to one's self.
Too often we are so hard on ourselves that we are our own worst enemy
in this regard.
In the recent seminar I attended where Peck was speaking, he told
us that we must be kind and gentle to ourselves. There is a sign
he has on his wall for those times where he thinks the weight of
solving the world problems are on his shoulders. It goes something
like this:
"You are not responsible for every little thing in the world
that needs attention. That is my job. Love, God."
Made a lot of sense to me. It is OK to give yourself gifts. Once
you are able to do this without feeling guilty (like taking a nap
or buying something special or treating yourself to a dinner out),
it becomes much easier to receive such things from other people.
Charity does begin in the home.
Cindy
Cindy
|
590.29 | CB on CB | BARAKA::BLAZEK | A new moon, a warm sun... | Fri Dec 18 1987 13:30 | 37 |
| If there's one thing I've learned from all of you it's that
every definition of everything, whether it's a belief, an
interpretation, or an ideal, is individualized. (And just
for the record, I've learned *LOTS* more, but this sort of
is the basis. *8-) ) So how I define unconditional love is
going to be different from everybody else, and how I perceive
what that love entails is also going to be different.
In my eyes, unconditional love means loving someone even if
you disagree with them. It means *accepting* them for what
they are and what they believe without trying to mold them
into something more suitable for me. I don't know yet if this
type of love is necessarily eternal, but I do know I *can*
experience it (because in my definition I have) if only for
a moment or two.
We are here to learn, I don't think that can be disputed.
I think most of us in DEJAVU (and hopefully elsewhere) are
constantly reaching to extend ourselves into realms previously
not understood, intellectually, emotionally, and spiritually.
In the same regard that I can't (yet) indefinitely retain the
loving peace I experience when I meditate, I also cannot (yet)
remain in a constant *ultimate* loving state for a similarly
undefined amount of time. This is one area I am striving to
extend *myself* and my capabilities.
And in the same sense that I can briefly tap into a beautiful
inner peace (the essence of my Soul), I believe I can also
tap into the Love of my Soul and *feel* and project that love
towards another person, towards myself, or towards a situation.
I'm not yet able to STAY tapped into that love and peace (maybe
I blow a fuse someplace??), but I *can* strive to bring out
the peace and love that I know are there somewhere within me
more frequently and even stronger than the last time.
Carla
|
590.30 | Unconditional Love is not Ownership | GRECO::MISTOVICH | | Mon Dec 21 1987 12:40 | 34 |
590.31 | hope this works! | FLOWER::JASNIEWSKI | | Mon Dec 28 1987 00:45 | 32 |
|
Wow - Frederick - you spent 2 days with Ken Keyes!?!
Ken speaks of dumping "the illusion of self" as part of attaining
a higher consciousness state, such as "unconditional love". That is, "dis-
identifying with the myriad of things we contain within our self boundary"
such as *my* religion, *my* path, *my* reputation, *my* space in time, *my*
opinion, etc.
He claims that we vigorously protect this "territory" in our
daily operating activities, so much that in fact it becomes a knee jerk
reaction for most people to do so. Supposedly the trick is to realize that
this is all just an *activity*, programmed into one's brain over the years,
NOT a graspable entity, or, a "somebody".
We generate the experience of alienation and anger toward's people
when they appear to encroach on this aforementioned "territory". Example:
"That SOB's gonna jump the green light (making a left hand turn)
and take *my* space in time"
Actually, the activity of protecting the "self"'s supposed "territory"
has generated the "anger and alienation" response. (We've all seen *numerous*
instances of this in NOTES) Perhaps dumping the illusion of self and it's
protectionary associated activities is part of the key to learning to love
unconditionally. All within reason, of course.
BTW, this has been a very inspiring note - I find myself grabing for
pencil and paper to write things down.
Joe Jas
|