T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
496.1 | | NONODE::JOLLIMORE | | Wed Sep 23 1987 08:59 | 5 |
| Shouldn't that be Autumnal Equinox??
Many happy returns to you also...
Jay
|
496.2 | next stop: Hallowe'en | ERASER::KALLIS | Raise Hallowe'en awareness. | Wed Sep 23 1987 09:36 | 16 |
| Re .0:
Time is out of joint; O cursed sprite
That ever I was born to put it right.
-- some Danish kid, per Willie Shakespeare
re .1:
Kerrect.
re everybody:
And the happiest equinox to you _all_.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
496.3 | | SPIDER::PARE | What a long, strange trip its been | Wed Sep 23 1987 10:28 | 1 |
| Blessed be.
|
496.4 | And have a nice lunation! | NATASH::BUTCHART | | Wed Sep 23 1987 10:29 | 4 |
| And don't forget the Moon is new also! Double hit of start-up energy
here. . .
Marcia
|
496.5 | The moon is new... | WAGON::DONHAM | Born again! And again, and again... | Wed Sep 23 1987 11:36 | 3 |
|
...which means l' shana tovah! (Happy New Year!)
|
496.6 | | DV780::WILSONP | alias DVWPS::WILSON | Wed Sep 23 1987 12:06 | 6 |
| For those of you who do not know what date Autumn Equinox is,
It is on September 21st.
BLESSED BE
PAT
|
496.7 | | NONODE::JOLLIMORE | | Wed Sep 23 1987 12:11 | 6 |
| .6
Not this year... it was today at 9:15am (I think anyone know the exact
time?) Actually, the dictionary (great source, eh) defines it as the 22nd
or 23rd.
Jay
|
496.8 | MISTAKES HAPPEN | DV780::WILSONP | alias DVWPS::WILSON | Wed Sep 23 1987 12:18 | 12 |
| RE: .7
Sorry, I had looked it up in on of my reference books at home which
said it was the 21st.
I looked it up in the dictionary just now and it did say Sept. 23rd.
Thanks for pointing it out.
BLESSED BE
PAT
|
496.9 | anyway, today's the day... | ERASER::KALLIS | Raise Hallowe'en awareness. | Wed Sep 23 1987 12:27 | 18 |
| Re .6, .7:
[aside: OmiGawd! A lesson in simple orbital mechanics and ....]
Actually, the Equinox is that time when the lighted and dark portions
of a day ["day" and "night"] are of equal duration. The spring
version is called the Vernal; the fall version, the Autumnal. The
Vernal is generally in the 20-21 March area; the Autumnal, generally
22-23 september. The reason for this apparent anomaly is due in
part to the cockamamie calendar we've been stuck with; another is
that the Earth's orbit is elliptical and thus the time between
equinoxes isn't exactly 182.65... days.
Then, there's the Leap Year problem....
See how simple it is?
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
496.10 | Who let all those nits in here? | FDCV13::PAINTER | | Wed Sep 23 1987 12:44 | 12 |
|
Re.-1
Details, details! (:^)
Side comment - I wonder if the sun uncorked a good bottle of dry
champagne to celebrate the event......
It's a good excuse for a celebration......
Cindy
|
496.11 | | NONODE::JOLLIMORE | | Wed Sep 23 1987 14:29 | 26 |
| .8 Pat What refernece book was that? I happen to hear it on the radio
this morning on the way in (WGBH Boston a program call _A New Day_ nice
show).
.9 Steve Real simple, eh?
.10 Cindy Any excuse'll do!
o o . O
o . .
___________________
\ o . /
Cheers! \ . /
\ o /
\ o . /
\ /
\ o . /
\ o /
\ /
\ /
I
I
I
I
-------
|
496.12 | | DV780::WILSONP | alias DVWPS::WILSON | Wed Sep 23 1987 14:42 | 6 |
| RE: .11
The book is the EIGHT SABBATHS FOR WITCHES.
PAT
|
496.13 | Re: When did you say it was? | NATASH::BUTCHART | | Wed Sep 23 1987 14:54 | 12 |
| In addition to what Steve said, another way to state it is that
the Sun is at 0 degrees declination when viewed from Earth. That
is, its "shadow" (what would one call a shadow of light, anyway?)
falls directly on the Earth's equator.
The 21st of September is referred to in many books as the general
guideline date for the Autumnal Equinox. Even though the 21st is
the "usual" date, it can vary a few days either way each year.
I've known years when it was right on the 21st, others when it
was the 20th, the 19th, the 22nd, etc.
Marcia
|
496.14 | | WAGON::DONHAM | Born again! And again, and again... | Wed Sep 23 1987 15:26 | 7 |
|
So is the moon always new at the equinox? This occurs (I think)
when the moon and sun have the same declination. I've lost my moon
calendar from last year; my guess (intuition ;^) ) says no, but
it pays to ask.
Tananda
|
496.15 | The changes feel good. | NEXUS::MORGAN | Welcome to the Age of Flowers | Wed Sep 23 1987 15:51 | 10 |
| Yeeeeeessssss! It's celebration time. These two have caught me
unawares. Our circle will celebrate the Autumnal Equinox tonight and
for the next full moon, which is my birthday, there is a lunar eclipse.
The change feels great.
The Aspens are at their peak this week, perhaps even today. I can
feel the days getting shorter even now. Skiable snow is on the way.
Look! Outside my window, was that a snowflake?
Blessed Be!
|
496.16 | Fall is a wonderful time. | MIST::IVERSON | It's all been said before, but... | Wed Sep 23 1987 16:28 | 7 |
| and its one of the few remaining Earth holidays that hasn't been
overshadowed and commercialized by "them" ;-)
Enjoy the season,
Kind thoughts to all.
Thom
|
496.17 | For all you nits out there... | MOSAIC::GARY | The Door is within, the key is in your hand | Wed Sep 23 1987 16:44 | 11 |
| According to my "Old Farmers Almanac" fall began at 9:45 am EDT this
morning.
Also according to the OFA the harvest moon will be the first full
moon in October that is Oct. 6....
-vicki
|
496.18 | Re: .14 | NATASH::BUTCHART | | Wed Sep 23 1987 16:45 | 21 |
| No, the Moon is not always new at the equinox.
The new Moon means that the Moon and Sun are what the astrologers
call "conjunct" (sitting on top of) each other. When these
conjunctions are _very_ exact, you have solar eclipses.
The declination effect occurs because the Earth is tilted on its
axis. This means that (from our Earthbound perspective) as the
year progresses the sunrise and sunset points appear to "travel"
from south to north and back again. The most southerly and northerly
points are called the solstices, and occur around the 21st of December
(winter) and 21st of June (summer). The points where the sun is
right at the equator are called the equinoxes, and occur around
March 21st (spring) and September 21st (autumn).
The lunation cycles are another thing altogether and follow different
timing. It's just an interesting occurrence to have the equinox
and lunation occur within a day of each other (heck, within 12 hours
of each other this year).
Marcia
|
496.19 | This and that | FDCV13::PAINTER | | Wed Sep 23 1987 19:16 | 20 |
| Re.16
Shhhh, not too loudly now. Someone from Hallmark cards might hear
you!
Re.14
Snow?!?!? Where?!?!
Time to get the boards tuned and checked. Heard from my Aussie
friend the other day - they had excellent conditions downunder.
He and his family stayed mid-slope and had door to door skiing -
true luxury! Ah, cool drinks on the sun deck, crashing and burning
gracefully, hot cocoa....it's all coming back to me now.
.....er, sorry, got carried away....wrong notes conference....
*<(8*)|
Cindy
|
496.20 | Thanks | DONNER::EVANSM | | Wed Sep 23 1987 19:16 | 6 |
| Gee Thanks, John.
From the death of the harvest, comes life in the spring.
Meg
|
496.21 | | DECWET::MITCHELL | Memory drugs: just say ..uh.. | Thu Sep 24 1987 05:41 | 8 |
| Oops, you're right, y'all. I meant equinox (unless that is what
you get if you cross a horse with an ox).
Hope it was happy.
John M.
|
496.22 | can't resist this. Or is this something metaphysical? :-) | ERASER::KALLIS | Raise Hallowe'en awareness. | Thu Sep 24 1987 09:25 | 13 |
| re .21:
> ... if you cross a horse with an ox).
you get:
A cross ox! :-)
Oxen don't breed. They can't.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
496.23 | (All Sing) M I C - K E Y - M O U S E! | FDCV13::PAINTER | | Thu Sep 24 1987 11:03 | 10 |
|
I think that in light of the festivities that we should all chip
in and buy John Mitchell, our resident Disney channeler a subscription
to 'New Age Journal' or some other relevant New Age publication.
Or would you prefer a Mickey Mouse T-shirt.....?
(;^)
Cindy
|
496.24 | RE: .23 | DECWET::MITCHELL | Memory drugs: just say ..uh.. | Thu Sep 24 1987 14:08 | 8 |
| I could do with a nice crystal, Cindy...
...as in diamond, ruby, or emerald! :-)
John M.
|
496.26 | | DECWET::MITCHELL | Memory drugs: just say ..uh.. | Fri Sep 25 1987 14:48 | 8 |
| RE: .25
Tell you what. Why don't you keep your quartz and take me out for
a few pints? ;-)
John M.
|
496.27 | Minor corrections | SSDEVO::YOUNGER | This statement is false | Fri Sep 25 1987 14:51 | 8 |
| re .12 (Pat)
The name of the book is _Eight_Sabbats_for_Witches_, by Stewart
and Janet Ferrar.
Witches don't have Sabbaths - we have Sabbats.
Elizabeth
|
496.28 | Minor tweak of minor corrections :-) | ERASER::KALLIS | Raise Hallowe'en awareness. | Fri Sep 25 1987 14:59 | 10 |
| Re .27:
>Witches don't have Sabbaths - we have Sabbats.
Wiccans and other white witches have Sabbats. The black kind have
Sabbaths.
An interesting way to differentiate 'em.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
496.29 | After a while you start to smile | GLORY::WETHERINGTON | | Mon Sep 28 1987 10:44 | 14 |
| RE .26
Let's go! You can help me root the Tigers on to a pennant victory
against the wicked Toronto Blue Jays.
"yes, and maybe it's the time of year
and maybe it's the time of man
and I don't know who I am,
but life is for learning."
CSN, Woodstock
DW
|
496.30 | How about a *real* challenge | SSDEVO::YOUNGER | This statement is false | Mon Sep 28 1987 12:24 | 8 |
| re .29:
I'm rooting for the Cubs. They are only (I think) 18 games out.
Let's go for a *real* challenge!
:^)
Elizabeth
|
496.31 | a question and a observation | VINO::EVANS | | Mon Sep 28 1987 13:51 | 10 |
| RE: Wiccan Sabbat
Pronounced how?
Interesting about "H"'s - Put one on the end, you got a Christian
thing, put one at the beginning, you got a Jewish thing, take it
out, you got a Wiccan thing....
Dawn
|
496.32 | | DV780::WILSONP | alias DVWPS::WILSON | Mon Sep 28 1987 15:21 | 6 |
| RE: 27
I typed that reply at work and did not have the book in front of
me. I do know the difference, I just made a mistake in typing.
PAT
|
496.33 | | WAGON::DONHAM | Born again! And again, and again... | Mon Sep 28 1987 16:55 | 5 |
|
re: Divine origin of the H
Heh counts for two of the four letters of the Tetragrammaton.
|
496.34 | | INK::KALLIS | Raise Hallowe'en awareness. | Mon Sep 28 1987 17:43 | 14 |
| re .33:
Were you going to title that "heh-heh"? :-D
Interestingly, the Tetragrammaton [YHWH or JHWH] is purely consonantal,
[unless you insist in treating "Y" as a vowel] whereas various
derivations of the name of a Supreme Being are based on vowel sounds;
especially the Gravesian derivation (from _The White Goddess_) and
the ultimate god of the ancient Egyptians (Uay [more or less, with
character limitations]; "neter" meaning any god), who was alluded
to but not worshipped directly (apparently the Egyptian gods did
that).
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
496.35 | HEH, yourself! | PBSVAX::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Mon Sep 28 1987 18:11 | 15 |
| RE: .34
That raises an interesting thought: Since classical Hebrew doesn't
have true vowels, a pure-vowel name-of-the-Supreme-Being would have
to be spelled as a blank. Think of the mystic significance of that.
RE: .33
Actually, though I don't speak/write/read Hebrew I'm pretty sure
that Shabbas (various transliterations) doesn't contain a HEH. The
sound transliterated with "sh" in English is I think the single
letter "shin" in Hebrew. Sabbath and Sabbat are both derived (through
intermediaries) from the Hebrew.
Topher
|
496.36 | | WAGON::DONHAM | Born again! And again, and again... | Mon Sep 28 1987 18:26 | 16 |
|
re: .35
Right, Topher, one would not combine an S sound and an H sound to
get SH in Hebrew...it's shin, which looks a bit like a fiery W.
Shin is one of the three Mother letters from which the rest of the
22 letters in the alphabet are derived (the other two are Aleph
and Mem, I think, or maybe it's Yod and Mem...).
In Qabala the four letters of the Tetragrammaton are assigned to
fire, air, water, and earth. If I remember correctly, the last Heh
looks different from the first Heh - Heh final is closed on the
bottom, resembling a weathered box, while Heh is open on the bottom
(been a while since I looked at any Hebrew...).
Tananda
|
496.37 | Pronounce it like... | SSDEVO::YOUNGER | This statement is false | Mon Sep 28 1987 21:12 | 6 |
| The first syllable of Sabbat is pronounced like the first syllable
of Sabbath. The second syllable is pronounced BAT, like the flying
rodent. The accent is on the first syllable.
Elizabeth
|
496.38 | Well .... | ERASER::KALLIS | Light up the Jack O'Lanterns | Tue Sep 29 1987 09:39 | 18 |
| Re .35:
>That raises an interesting thought: Since classical Hebrew doesn't
>have true vowels, a pure-vowel name-of-the-Supreme-Being would have
>to be spelled as a blank. Think of the mystic significance of that.
Actually, wouldn't there have been spoken vowels? If classical
_written_ Hebrew has no true vowels and the Name was nopthing _but_
vowels, the significance would be that it couldn't be written directly;
that in turn could have led to the tradition that it _shouldn't_
be written directly, which in turn would lead to a belief/tradition
that it shouldn't be written or spoken. I find it noteworthy that
when I've seen references to the Supreme Being by Jewish writers
who feel it's improper to spell out "God," they drop the vowel,
thus: "G-d."
St-v- K-ll-s, Jr.
[just kidding, folks :-D]
|
496.39 | | AKOV11::FRETTS | Shine your Spirit! | Tue Sep 29 1987 10:03 | 14 |
|
Though we are straying from the topic of this note, I did want to
share that we have worked with the symbology of the letters Aleph
and Shin quite a bit in my church. The Aleph symbolizing the
silence before you speak, a silence that is totally full - the Shin
symbolizing the shattering, the breaking apart of structures that
no longer are working and allowing for rebuilding. I find it very
interesting that the symbol of the Shin looks very much like the
symbol used for the planet Uranus, whose symbology matches that
of the Shin in astrological terms.
Carole
|
496.40 | | WAGON::DONHAM | Born again! And again, and again... | Tue Sep 29 1987 11:28 | 14 |
|
re: .-1, others
Carole, sounds like an interesting church!
Written Hebrew _does_ have vowels...they are placed under the letter
and are pronounced after the sound of that letter.
re: saBAT...in Hebrew one would say either SHA-bas or sha-BAT,
depending on whether the Sephardic or Aszkenazi (never could spell
that one!) convention was being used.
Tananda
|
496.41 | Yes, in modern Hebrew. | PBSVAX::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Tue Sep 29 1987 11:39 | 8 |
| RE: .40
That's why I said "classical" Hebrew (yes, Steve, I should have
said classical *written* Hebrew). The "vowel marks" are a modern
invention. Besides, with a word/name without consonents, there
wouldn't be anything to put the vowel marks *on*.
Topher
|
496.42 | | VINO::EVANS | | Tue Sep 29 1987 13:32 | 9 |
| RE: .37 Thank' yoo_ (pitcure diacritical marks) :-)
RE: last several
Gee, this conference is great, even when we get 'way off the topic!
I *love* this place!
Dawn
|
496.43 | | CIMNET::KOLKER | Conan the Librarian | Tue Sep 29 1987 18:37 | 4 |
| re .35
Shabbat is spelled shin, bet, tov in Hebrew.
|
496.44 | | CIMNET::KOLKER | Conan the Librarian | Tue Sep 29 1987 18:44 | 17 |
| re .40
The sub linear vowels were invented around 200-300 c.e. by Rabbis
in the Babylonian yeshivot. They also aranged the verses in tanach,
to form the socalle Maseritic Text. Masertic is from the Hebrew
M'Surah which means traditional or what is received.
Hebrew in Isreal is rarely pointed. Only "foreign" words which are
transliterated are pointed (voweled). A Hebrew reader would know
from context what the vowels ought to be. We have that in English.
For example.
Wntd. Thr Rm Frn Apt Nr Sbwy.
A form of shorthand called speed writing makes use of the fact that
most vowels in words that appear in context, are redundant..
|
496.45 | pagan questionnaire | LEZAH::BOBBITT | love means letting go.... | Fri Nov 08 1991 15:19 | 89 |
|
This wasn't really deserving of a whole new topic, so I put it here
"to all you pagans...."
A friend of a friend is doing this, and requests responses to her
within a week, if you wish to respond.
-------cut here-------
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 91 18:10:49 -0500
From: [email protected] (Elena O'Malley)
Subject: Re: pagans and such
My name is Elena O'Malley. I am an undergraduate at Harvard University
taking a class called Folklore and Mythology 108. I am writing a paper
for this class on the subject of the differences between the perceptions
of Neo-pagan women and men about their beliefs. This paper will not
be published, and any notes or transcipts having to do with this paper
will be viewed only by myself. If, for some reason, this situation
changes, I will ask your permission to release any data you have
given me. Unless you request otherwise, you will be arbitrarily
assigned a letter of the alphabet (i.e. Informant C) if you or the
information you give me is referred to anywhere in the paper.
You do not have to answer all the questions, but please provide as much
explanation as you can to the questions you do answer. Any information is
helpful.
1. Gender
2. Age
3. What do you call your religion/organization/belief system, and what
is your (official) position within it?
4. How long have you been a part of this religion/organization/belief
system?
5. How did you become involved? (Did a person inform you, did you
read about it, brought up that way, create it yourself?)
6. What were you before?
7. Are you part of a group, or is your practice/beliefs solitary?
If yes, what is the group organization, and how or by whom is
the group led?
8. Are you part of a national/international movement? (Is it
primarily political or religious, or other?)
9. If your religion/belief system/organization is religious, do you
have gender-specific deities? Who or what are they?
10. Do you worship a deity or deities because of its/his/her/their gender?
11. How do you perceive, or do you in fact perceive, gender roles as being
different from your previous religion/belief system/organization or
surrounding society? (Or how are your perceptions different from those
around you?)
12. Do you find yourself assigned or choosing roles in your religion/belief
system/organization based on your gender?
13. Are there any rituals/beliefs/practices that are gender-specific in your
religion/belief system/organization?
14. Do you feel at all persecuted, either within your religion/belief system/
organization because of your gender, or outside your religion/belief
system/organization because of your religion/belief system/organization.
(Also, if relevant, how does your family view your religion/belief system/
organization?)
15. Is there anything (gender-related or otherwise) you think I have not
considered and want to comment on? If so, please feel free.
16. Any questions or confusions? Please contact me if so. I apologize for
the wordiness of some of the questions, but I am not entirely sure of
what the word "pagan" means to different people. If you've gotten
this far, thank you for your time and cooperation.
Elena O'Malley
3 Sacramento Street
Cambridge, MA 02138
USA
(617) 493-6634
[email protected]
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
|
496.46 | How to send your replies to the surveyer. | CADSYS::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Fri Nov 08 1991 15:32 | 14 |
| RE: .45
Note, to reply to this from a VMS system on the ENet, you can send
your response to:
DECWRL::"[email protected]"
Note the quote marks. If you are sending direct from the DCL line,
where you would normally put quotes around the mail address, you
will need to write:
"DECWRL::""[email protected]"""
Topher
|