T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
476.1 | Universal Rules | LISVAX::FONTAINHAS | Pedro Fonta�nhas | Fri Sep 04 1987 13:25 | 22 |
|
Quite impressive experiences, Helaine.
Have you tried to think along one of the following axes ? ...
1. There is no Time. Whatever was, or will be, just IS !
2. Pre-conditioning. You live whatever your deepest levels of
subconsciousness dictate, and they themselves are governed by a
very simple set of universal rules.
3. Others ?
... would like to deepen the subject ...
Regards,
Pedro
|
476.2 | some suggestions | INK::KALLIS | Raise Hallowe'en awareness. | Fri Sep 04 1987 13:40 | 20 |
| Re .1:
>1. There is no Time. Whatever was, or will be, just IS !
One approach, sometimes taken by various Eastern mystical schools
of thought. Deterministic.
>2. Pre-conditioning. You live whatever your deepest levels of
>subconsciousness dictate, and they themselves are governed by a
>very simple set of universal rules.
Another possibilility is that subconscious clues/suggestions made
someone a) see the HUNTS label, and b) made people seek out mates
with the proper names. Improbable, but not impossible.
>3. Others ?
Precognitive ESP, for one.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
476.3 | definitly interesting | STAR::DICKINSON | | Fri Sep 04 1987 15:56 | 39 |
|
| Another possibilility is that subconscious clues/suggestions made
| someone a) see the HUNTS label, and b) made people seek out mates
| with the proper names. Improbable, but not impossible.
But how could one "see" the hunts label ?
I would think it difficult to physically see a small label at a
distance. Did you mean "see" in a different way
What/Who are the entities that supply information to the board users?
I have had some experiencess using the board (since i'munsure of
the spelling, I'll say board) that cannot be explained by anytihing
I've evercome across - for example:
The first time I ever 'seriously' used wit was with two friends. Both
of these woen and myself were soulmates. When we used the board,
we asked for the name of the entity controling the board movements,
we were given the name Jerome.
While using the board, I had my eyes closed, and i remember seeing
a cave. At one point I was in the cave. Jerome mentioned the name
of another entity whose name I can't recall.
A few days later Iwas telling my mother about this, and she became
very excited. She told me a story that she had never told me before
regarding her fathers famil. Briefly, the story entailed her fathers
brothers working a silver mine in Canada. Thier seemed to be some
buisness involving the three brothers wherin one of the brothers,
named Jerome somehow met in an acciden, and the other two walked
away with rights to the mine. All of the brothers names had been
given toume while we were using the board. My mother was astonished
when she realized I knew their names. My grandfather refused to
discuss it when I mentioned it to hi, but my mother is still very
interested. There is more to this story, but this is already getting
too long. Suffice it to say, there is something about those boards
that cannot be explained through conventioal means.
peter
|
476.4 | Misc. Ouija notes. | PBSVAX::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Fri Sep 04 1987 16:23 | 28 |
| RE: previous
"Precognitive ESP" (or simply precognition) is a label for whatever
is happening here (to the extent that it cannot be explained by
"conventional" mechanisms), rather than an alternative explanation.
It is surprising what *can* be seen or inferred which the subconscious
can make use of. Parapsychologists consider an ESP test conclusive
only if noone who has had even a glimpse of the target is present
in the room with the percipient, or has been in contact with them
since seeing the target.
There is a question with the Ouija board (the name, though generally
pronounced "we gee" comes from the French and German words for yes
and so is spelled this way) whether the board is controlled by
external "spirits" or by the users subconscious. There is vast
amounts of evidence that the personalities who show themselves on
the Ouija board are created (collectively in this case) by the users
subconscious. The subconscious needs to somehow get any accurate
information it passes on, and among the mechanisms seems to be that
which we label ESP. This does not exclude the intervention of spirits,
however, since the spirits might be the source of the ESP. This
still requires the spirits to have clairvoyance (to non-physically
"see" whats going on near the board and elsewhere), precognition
(to determine future events to be communicated) and telepathy
(in order to talk to the users' subconscious).
Topher
|
476.5 | St. Germaine Connection | BARAKA::BLAZEK | | Tue Sep 08 1987 15:21 | 10 |
| Earlier this morning I added 8.36, giving my views/
interpretations of the Ouija board. Although there
are now only five entries to this second Ouija notes
file, it seems to be much more upbeat than the original
one, which is how it should be.
I'm interested in knowing whether anybody out there has also
had success in channeling St. Germaine. He is a "teaching"
entity, and is who my meditation group mostly communicates with.
|
476.6 | | CSC32::WOLBACH | | Tue Sep 08 1987 17:13 | 13 |
| Wow! What a thought! Am I understanding correctly?
Should those who work with Ouija boards 'share' the
name(s) of those who 'come thru' and see if there
are common personalities (spirits) contacting each
of us who communicate thru DEJAVU? Is there a common
bond or link between all of us? Has "something" drawn
us together in this file?
Sort of like finding out that your great aunt's next
door neighbor was a dear dear friend of your best
friends mom....
|
476.7 | * No Such Thing As Coincidence * | BARAKA::BLAZEK | | Wed Sep 09 1987 11:00 | 19 |
| It's my feeling that we should share all that we know -- not
to embrace other people's beliefs, but to perhaps open our
minds even further.
I do believe that there is a REASON for all of us to be part
of DEJAVU. One of the teachings that makes sense to me is
that because each of us is in charge of our own lives and
occurrences in each life, then there is no such thing as
coincidence. This would also mean there is no such thing
as luck.
I will happily share with "whom" my group channels to. We
make no attempts whatsoever to ever contact a known deceased
person, because that's not where any of us are at. We want
to learn and love, and therefore the entities (masters) who
speak to us give us just that.
CB
|
476.8 | Waiting and Wondering | FROST::BATES | | Wed Sep 09 1987 12:42 | 15 |
|
Way back in December 1986 a couple of my friends were using a board,
just asking all kinds of questions. They asked how many children
I was going to have, what sex they would be, and when the first
would be born. The board told them I would have two children, first
a boy then a girl, and the first one would be arriving January of
1988. Well quess what? Though my husband and I were not thinking
of, or planning on having children at this time, our first is due
January 9, 1988. I'm anxious to see if it's going to be a boy.
This is something I certainly have no control over. Should be a
pretty good test.
Jennifer
|
476.9 | ASKING THE WRONG QUESTIONS | BAXTA::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Wed Sep 09 1987 13:19 | 29 |
|
JUST in the last couple of weeks i have been thinking about the
idea of having a note to be a base for Ouija board experiments.I
have made a lot of entries about Ouija boards in this conference
and have had some of you ask me questions about my experiences.Most
people do not take it seriously and only think it is a game to be
played and ask it questions,which can for the most part,not be answered
accurately.I have been using the board steady for the past year
and made many discoveries,which are scattered throughout this
conference. I have had some of you ask me things off line and so
far there seems to be a lot of fear surrounding it,especially when
i tell you what i have learned.
I am not going to go through what i have already said elseware,except
to say that the board operates by energy fields and telepathy.The
spirit contact uses telepathy and the energy field to move the pointer
which is where the energy focases.That is why the board operates
better with two people,because of the combining of the energy from
two makes the field stronger.
Has anyone here ever taken the time to ask who they were speaking
to on the board and find out about that spirit and when they were
last on earth and about there life here?Ever ask where they are
now and what it is like there?
I've heard a lot of comments about theories and brief encounters,
but not much real experiments or investigation.
PEACE
MICHAEL
|
476.10 | Asking The RIGHT Questions | BARAKA::BLAZEK | | Wed Sep 09 1987 14:05 | 30 |
| I've touched briefly on the answers to a couple of your questions,
Michael, so will elaborate a little more.
First of all, my meditation group uses the Ouija board each week
and all of us take it very seriously. I think the reason that
some people fear it is because you cannot take its power lightly,
you should not use it as a game. Because of the non-serious
attitude of some people (good examples are the negative experiences
had by many people when they were teenagers) they don't have the
powerful, peaceful, and GOOD messages given by the Masters.
When we use the Board, the entity who speaks to us always
identifies himself. For instance, St. Germaine always makes
a large G on the Board, Helos makes rapid little circles before
giving us his message. St. Germaine is the spiritual guide to
our group, so it is he who usually speaks to us.
Futuristic questions should not be asked. We always begin our
meetings by meditating for approximately an hour, and ask that
all less than Christ's perfection be barred from us. Afterwards
we use the Board, and once we make contact we ask if they have a
message for us. After we get the message, then individuals will
ask questions about certain events in their life. Our spiritual
leaders will NOT tell us anything about the future and they are
very quick to point out that they will not tell us WHAT TO DO.
I hope this helps...
CB
|
476.11 | more questions | MTBLUE::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Wed Sep 09 1987 15:48 | 18 |
| CB,
Are you willing to reveal what "messages" you receive?How about
a couple of examples?Do you have someone take down what is said?
Did you ask for verification of the spirits claim about who he is?
Do you ask about where he is and what it is like?
I have so many questions!;^) But,i am very curious about your work
and findings.I would be interested in comparing notes.
I hope you would be willing to give more info.
Thanks.
PEACE
MICHAEL
|
476.12 | Sharing... 8-) | BARAKA::BLAZEK | | Wed Sep 09 1987 17:08 | 37 |
| Michael,
I don't think that St. Germaine has ever been incarnate; like I
said before he is the "records keeper." My meeting is tonight,
so I will find out for sure. But the peaceful energy that comes
from communicating with him is wonderful! I'm still very much
in a learning process myself!
As for where he is -- he and all the entities are HERE and
everywhere. It's been described to me that it's like a
radio frequency -- you don't get anything unless the dial
is in the right place. And there are thousands of channels,
some more loving than others. It's a matter of your mind
tuning into the station/channel/frequency that you seek.
I've been taught that we are constantly surrounded by our
spiritual guides even though we can't visually see them.
They are with us to help, to teach, and to learn themselves,
because not all of them have lived in the human form.
St. Germaine says that the joy, peace, and happiness that we
experience when we pass on is indescribable, and like nothing
we have ever known on Earth. We ARE energy in the most peaceful
and loving sense of the word.
I am more than willing to share with you -- I have a notebook
full of messages we get each week from the Board, and would
be delighted to share them with you. The entities love to
communicate with us -- it is really a shame that so many people
are so afraid... The power within us is great and should not be
feared.
Carla
"Fear and regret are twin thieves that rob us of today..."
|
476.13 | SHARING SOME EXPERIENCES | FANTUM::GRENIER | | Thu Sep 10 1987 19:47 | 34 |
| When I was a teenager, my girlfriend and I played with the "board".
We had been instructed to identify the spirit who communicated with
us. We found it to be two indian girls who were put to death because
they were lovers. One of them was very friendly and talkative, while
the other was not. She seemed to me to be jealous and hateful,
especially of men. She would not talk when I was sharing the board,
but would when my girlfriend's sister did. They told us that they
were put to death around 1600ad.
Ocasionally we would test their insight and abilities and to our
constant amazement they were often correct. The best test was when
I lost a ring given to me by my girlfriend. She was of course upset,
so we gave it a try. They said we would find it in my backyard under
a tree. Well there are many trees in the yard, so we got everybody
to stand in a different spot in the yard. Then we asked who was
closest to the ring. Then we got everyone to stand around the person
closest and asked again who was closest. After the next answer,
we all started looking real hard around that persons feet, and lo
and behold, up turned a metal washer, silver just like the ring.
Skepticism took over, as well as darkness, so we gave up the search.
About a week later though, the ring popped up in the backyard under
a big tree.
Sometimes the messages would be confused, or morbid, or increadibly
filthy. These reasons caused us to begin fearing the use of the
"board". To this day I have never used one.
My new SO has one in her closet. She says that she is scared to
use it too, but she won't throw it away.
I would like to start using it again under controlled conditions.
I definitely believe in its abilities, or our abilities, but they
can be scary when they get out of control.
I really like this conference
Rich Grenier
|
476.14 | ? | MASTER::EPETERSON | | Fri Sep 11 1987 11:43 | 8 |
| re: .12
Carla,
I don't understand. If St. Germaine (my middle name, by the way)
was not ever a human, how is he/she/(?) a saint?
Marion
|
476.15 | More questions | BAXTA::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Fri Sep 11 1987 12:43 | 18 |
| CARLA,
I would really like to know the kind of messages that are being
given.Would you please share that with me?
Do you contact other spirits on the board and do they give any
history of their life on earth?
What about senses,such as smell,touch,what do they say about this?
I am still looking to compare notes and do some experimenting with
anyone who is interested.
Thanks.
PEACE
MICHAEL
|
476.16 | I wanna know | VINO::EVANS | | Fri Sep 11 1987 13:25 | 28 |
| I find the notes on Ouija especially interesting, and I hvae no
doubt that they do what people *say* they do. BUT:
Well, look.
I mean, there's gotta be a Ouija Board Factory somewhere, right?
Cutting, or stamping, out Ouija Boards from some perfectly ordinary
material, right?
Ditto for the planchette.
Perfectly ordinary instruction sheet, perfectly ordinary paper,
right?
I've read in WIccan-related literature how to make a "power staff".
It involves picking a *particular* kind of wood, in a *particular*
spot in a forest, at a *particular* time of year, with *particular*
accompanying rituals.
Yet here we have you basic Ouija Board Assembly Line, making and
packaging Ouija Boards for Toys-backwards-R-Us, in presumably a
very oridnary manner.
So *HOW COME* these things work the way they do? As opposed to a
piece of plywood from the garage, or whatever?
Huh?
Dawn
|
476.17 | I'm Pedaling As Fast As I Can | BARAKA::BLAZEK | | Fri Sep 11 1987 14:49 | 17 |
|
I didn't find out if St. Germaine has ever lived, but I plan
on doing some research this weekend and will let you know first
thing Monday morning.
There are what's known as "The Masters" who are on the highest
plane -- it is they whom I contact and turn to for guidance.
Since I'm not familiar with many, many specifics, I do not know
if it's possible to become a St. without ever incarnating -- but
please note that I don't think this has anything to do with
Catholicism and that kind of stuff.
And Michael, I'm bringing the message that we got last night and
I'll enter it here after lunch.
Carla
|
476.18 | Differing traditions, differing practices. | PBSVAX::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Fri Sep 11 1987 14:49 | 28 |
| RE: .16
I believe that the OUIJA board is the patented product of Parker
Brothers.
You are comparing too different traditions. The Wiccan tradition
emphasizes (among many other things) the power that things get by
means of ritual, place, and time.
The OUIJA board comes from the Spiritualist tradition. In that
tradition, although an object may get additional power -- good or
bad -- through a history of use, a tool's basic "power" comes from
its suitability in form for use by the medium (whether or not they
are formally trained) who is the part of the bridge between worlds
which is the point. In other words, in the Spiritualist tradition
(and in other related traditions which have adopted the OUIJA) the
power comes from the "other" side, is mediated by the medium, and
is manifested, through ordinary or otherwise means, in an appropriate
physical instrument (note that many Spritualists accept that the
OUIJA board is being moved by unconscious movements of the workers,
but believe that the movements are directed from the other side).
The original (non-comercial) form of the OUIJA board used an ordinary
smooth table, with letters drawn on it for the occasion, and an
inverted wine glass as the planchette. The OUIJA planchette was
originally a holder for a pen used with automatic writing.
Topher
|
476.19 | this old board ... | INK::KALLIS | Raise Hallowe'en awareness. | Fri Sep 11 1987 15:23 | 47 |
| Re .16:
That depends a lot on the way you view symbolism/ritual/mechanisms.
Those that believe, for instance, that Ouija operations are
subconsciously driven (that is, "internal"), are able to believe
that there is no necessary ritual to manufacture, since the
participants are doing their thing (BTW: you can also get a planchette
with built-in pencil for a form of writing [automatic or channeled,
depending on your perspective] without a board needed).
>So *HOW COME* these things work the way they do? As opposed to a
>piece of plywood from the garage, or whatever?
Who says a home-made Ouija-type board won't work? The operative
idea of a board is that it allows you to concentrate. Likewise,
most "crystal" balls are really not crystal, but glass (a ball composed
of real crystal -- usually quartz -- is nearly an order of magnitude
more costly than glass). Lately, acrylic "crystal" balls have been
coming into the marketplace because of their relative low cost.
However, on ritualistic stuff:
>It involves picking a *particular* kind of wood, in a *particular*
>spot in a forest, at a *particular* time of year, with *particular*
>accompanying rituals.
Yes, because they're attempting one or another form of magic (the
real stuff). The particular tree is associated with a god, goddess,
or other such entity, the location might be a power spot or energy
concentration, the time of year would have paraastrological
significance, and the ritual would be used to activate the stuff.
The difference here is that the person(s) doing this do so to make
use of the most powerful resources available.
Now, suppose you want to make a really powerful Ouija-type board.
You might use willow-wood for the board, ink using resin from the
dragon's blood herb for the lettering on the board, and a planchette
composed of tin with a quartz window. If its assembly were done
close to, and on the eastern side of a natural body of water about three
hours after sunset in the spring on a Saturday night with the moon
phase between half and full. Any external aspects would probably
be amplified by such a board; however, if anybodty wants to try
that kind of a board, it should be done under strict control,
preferably in the presence of an experienced occultist.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
476.20 | Please elaborate | HPSCAD::DDOUCETTE | Common Sense Rules! | Fri Sep 11 1987 15:49 | 18 |
| Re: .16
>> Now, suppose you want to make a really powerful Ouija-type board.
You might use willow-wood for the board, ink using resin from the
dragon's blood herb for the lettering on the board, and a planchette
composed of tin with a quartz window. If its assembly were done
close to, and on the eastern side of a natural body of water about three
hours after sunset in the spring on a Saturday night with the moon
phase between half and full. Any external aspects would probably
be amplified by such a board; however, if anybodty wants to try
that kind of a board, it should be done under strict control,
>> preferably in the presence of an experienced occultist.
I'm curious, how did get such a combination? what is so important
about the combination? And who else is interested in making a board
like this (I have some maple, is that good enough? :-) ).
|
476.21 | Cross reference. | PBSVAX::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Fri Sep 11 1987 16:45 | 10 |
| RE: .17
Note 407.* and following are about an historical and several legendary
people known as Comte de Saint-Germain. I would doubt whether you
are being contacted by the actual spirit of this interesting rougue.
Rather, I would say that your spirit contact has chosen this name
to tell you something -- probably relating to one of the legends
of the real person.
Topher
|
476.22 | I hope this clarifies things ... | INK::KALLIS | Raise Hallowe'en awareness. | Fri Sep 11 1987 17:07 | 28 |
| Re .20
>I'm curious, how did get such a combination? what is so important
>about the combination?
The original question concerned why one could apparently get results
out of a mass-manufactured item of no symbolic significance in the
case of a Parker Brothers board while one had to go through all
kinds of trouble to make a certain Wiccan item. I took it to its
conclusion by discussing how one could use materials having their mystic
traditions to amplify results. The combination I chose was primarily
to enhance manifestory powers, and on the basis of what was affordable.
I could have, for example, chosen Agrippa's "speculum" material
for the board, but the alloy of gold, silver, iron [in filing form],
mercury, lead, tin, and copper would take at the minimum a year
(and possibly as long as eight!) to mix _properly_; I could have
suggested an inlay of onyx for the letters, a gold-mercury amalgum
alloy for the planchette, and an open hole surrounded by opals for
the top of the planchette. That would have equivalent (even a little
stronger) manifestory powers, but not only would be harder to make,
but _far_ more expensive.
However, again, anyone wanting to use a natural-amplifier board
like that should take care, and have an experienced occultist around
to make sure things stay under control.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
476.23 | HELLO OUT THERE! | MTBLUE::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Mon Sep 14 1987 12:58 | 14 |
|
WELL,i am still interested in the messages being sent.
I guess no one is going to take me up on my challenge to do some
experimenting and comparing notes.
Has there ever been a serious scientific investigation of Ouija
boards,and if so,where can we get the imformation?
I am so impatient.Its a part of my personality ;^)
PEACE
MICHAEL
|
476.24 | 'Fess Up Guys | BARAKA::BLAZEK | | Mon Sep 14 1987 13:46 | 15 |
| Sorry Michael, it's been busy in my neck of the woods and when I
come in to work so early in the morning |-\ I seem to have a hard
time remembering to bring in my "Wednesday Night" notebook.
I will enter the message we got last week later this afternoon or
first thing tomorrow morning (promise!).
As far as experimenting goes, what do you mean by that? One of
the more interesting aspects of your entries is that you know the
Ouija board isn't a game... I, too, have a very strong belief in
that. Am I the only one out here who uses the Board on a regular
basis? I can't believe it!!
Carla
|
476.25 | | MANTIS::PARE | | Mon Sep 14 1987 14:38 | 1 |
| We're almost ready Michael... just a little more time.
|
476.26 | More Questions | MTBLUE::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Mon Sep 14 1987 15:28 | 20 |
|
Hi all,
Thank-you i am anxiously anticipating your entry Carla.
I am a regular user of the board,and,have made many contacts with
many different souls in the last year.
Carla,how do you work the board?Is it handled by two persons or
one?Do you have certain ones that use it?How about if you have two
males or two females or one of each?
Do you have a person writing the letters down seperate from the
users?
By experimenting i mean setting up conditions and seeing the results
and comparing notes.
PEACE
MICHAEL
|
476.27 | Thank you | VINO::EVANS | | Mon Sep 14 1987 16:54 | 6 |
| Thanks, Steve, Topher.
Once again, I learn something from this conference!
Dawn
|
476.28 | Get The Juices Flowing | BARAKA::BLAZEK | | Mon Sep 14 1987 18:08 | 21 |
| Our group usually consists of 3-7 people. Two of the people (one
male, one female) have an incredible energy together so when they're
both present it is the two of them who are on the Board. The male
portion of that duo is always there, and if the woman is not then
it's usually myself who pairs up with him, since the two of us
also share a good energy. If I'm not on the Board, I write down
the messages; if I am on the Board, someone else does. We pretty
much go with the flow on who's there, and who's in what kind of
mood.
I've never tried the Board all by myself, but do know of a woman
in Denver who has the most powerful energy and that planchette
just wisks around spelling out messages like a little powerboat!
Michael, if you give me some more specifics on what type of
experiments you'd like to conduct then I'd be able to tell you
if my group would be interested.
Carla
|
476.29 | Kids on the board ??? | CHARON::PAGE | Cal Page | Tue Sep 15 1987 09:54 | 6 |
| What if I let my two kids, aged 7 and 5 use the board? Neither
can spell anything so if spirits really direct the thing, sensible
words should come out?
Any ideas?
|
476.30 | experiments | MTBLUE::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Tue Sep 15 1987 11:21 | 34 |
|
Thanks Carla.
It would be interesting to see what happens when the man is replaced
with someone else.If he is always present i would suggest as an
experiment for him to let someone else take his place and see the
results.
Cal,Your suggestion on the children would be interesting,but,it
should be strickly controlled,and the children should not be allowed
to use the board by themselves.Because of their age,there may not
be enough energy available.It should be a boy and a girl for the
best results.
My wife and I use the board regular,and i have used it by myself,but
there wasnt enough energy to make it work well when i was alone.
I have had my wife call out the letters while i had my head turned
away from the board and vise versa and it still functioned fine.
We talked with a spirit that was a German soldier and he would,at
times,speak to us in German.We would ask him to translate it for
us,which he did.Later we would check in a bookstore for a
German/english dictionary and confirm that the translation was
correct,which it was.
Another experiment would be to blindfold both people on the board
and have a third party write down the message without speaking.
How about the messages?I'm still Impatiently waiting ;^)
PEACE
MICHAEL
|
476.31 | Tidbits | FRSBEE::HIGGINS | | Tue Sep 15 1987 13:10 | 11 |
|
From my Ouija experiences years ago:
"Spirit" = Debbie
Comments - Said I was married to her in a previous life!
Told me that my wife would kill me using Drano at
the age of 35! (gonna stay single for awhile)
Mark
|
476.32 | The lady plumber | VINO::EVANS | | Tue Sep 15 1987 13:47 | 10 |
| RE: .31
*DRANO*?????
REALLY??!?!?!?!?
Sure her name wasn't Josephine? :-)
Dawn
|
476.33 | Rigorous experiments. | PBSVAX::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Tue Sep 15 1987 16:18 | 89 |
| RE: .29
To mean anything at all the experiment would have to be conducted
so that no adult was present in the room. Ideally, the experiment
would be monitored with a video camera from a location which was
out of earshot of the kids.
The reason is something called the "Clever Hans Effect." Without
going into too many details, Clever Hans was a horse who seemed to
be able speak intelligently by means of an elaborate hoof-tap code.
Clever Hans' owner did not even have to be present. It turned out
that Clever Hans was "reading" slight muscle reactions on the part
of people standing with him, which indicated what they subconsciously
expected him to tap out next. In other words he was acting exactly
like a OUIJA board according to conventional explanations of its
operation.
Anything that a horse can do, I would expect that a child of 7 or
even 5 could do subconsciously.
Even then the experiment would be only "suggestive" not conclusive.
First off, there is the possibility of direct ESP, without any
real spirits involved, could cause the results.
Secondly, you cannot really assume that your children do not "know
how to read." All you know is that they are not consciously able
to read. The subconscious is amazingly "intelligent" and can
remember and learn from many things which the conscious mind does
not remember at all. Your children have certainly been exposed
to reading, and so may have subconsciously learned it. I know this
sounds fantastic, but equally fantastic examples of subconscious
learning have been demonstrated on many occasions. Even keeping to
conventional science we are, each of us, much, much more than we credit
ourselves.
As MICHAEL points out, a failure of the experiment would not be
conclusive either -- it would simply indicate that the children
involved do not have enough of what it takes (whatever that is) to get
results. So a positive result would be inconclusive (though suggestive
and interesting) and a negative result wouldn't mean much at all.
RE: .30
Boy/Girl combo -- worth a try but not everybody agrees that such a
combination is any better than other combinations. Even if this *is*
true for adults it does not follow that it applies to children before
sexual maturity (or at least the *start* of sexual maturity). Is the
power of male/female combinations because of the ubiquitous sexual
interaction (in which case, for example, homosexuals should be paired
with homosexuals of the same sex for greatest efficacy) or because of
a more archetypal combination of opposites.
Not looking at the board -- afraid nothing much can be concluded from
this. First of all, contrary to simplified descriptions of the
conventional explanation for the operation of the OUIJA board, the
resulting personality arises from the interaction of the participants,
including, to some extent, bystanders via the Clever Hans mechanism.
So each of the participants may independently carry on with the other
looking away. A positive result (the OUIJA failing to operate
coherently when one or the other participant looked away) would have
meant something, but a negative result in the one person looks away
test doesn't mean anything.
Secondly, if the OUIJA continuing to operate while one or both
participants aren't looking meant something we would have to conclude
that everyone who touch types is, unbeknownst to them, channeling a
spirit.
Here is a "blind" OUIJA test which *would* be pretty rigorous (though
it still would not distinguish spirits from subconscious ESP): Choose
a cipher randomly and secretly, perhaps using a computer. No one
in the room must know which cipher was chosen. The code could be
displayed where none of the incarnate participants could observe it
(e.g., on the screen of a CRT which is facing a non-shiny wall), or
you could depend on the spirits clairvoyance or precognition to
discover it. The OUIJA board would be expected to spell out a message
"in code" which could then be decoded to reveal the "real" message.
Ideally, a spirit could be talked into producing a specific message
(once its decoded), but any comprehensible message of moderate length
produced this way would be *VERY* impressive. You would have to be
very careful about how you would go about choosing the random code. A
simple substitution cipher would be adequate, and would not be very
taxing to the spirit, but with such a simple form of cipher, any
information to the participants about the decoded message would require
that a new cipher be selected. If you actually wish to go through
with this test, I'd be glad to advise you on the nit-picky details.
Topher
|
476.34 | Sorry For The Delay... | BARAKA::BLAZEK | | Tue Sep 15 1987 19:20 | 34 |
| The theory of a boy/girl combination can be questioned when you
consider the fact that our true selves (our soul, if you will) are
neither male nor female, and since it is our "true" selves that
the higher entities are connecting with it shouldn't really matter
too much if it is a boy/girl combination on the Board. I've had
equally powerful energy experiences with other women -- I really
think that it depends on the individuals. In my experience. 8-)
And my dear Michael, you've been very patient. Here's the message
we received last week from St. Germaine:
"Be sure that all of you here tonight are helping many more
than you know. Even when others are not ready for your teaching,
they register on a subconscious level also. You teach by action
as well. This is why it is so important to control your thoughts
at all times."
There were some personal questions and messages to members of the
group. Then I asked for a message for a friend of mine who is having
some troubles in her own -- the message could well be applied to all
of us...:
"Tell her that she always has the love and support of many and
she is never alone. We are with her always and we share her
joys and sorrows. All she need do is ask and we are there.
When we have outgrown a learning situation we must change.
If we do not do so by choice then the universe will do so for
us. All change is needed, for that simply means that we have
graduated to another class."
Carla
|
476.35 | One More Thing To Read | BARAKA::BLAZEK | | Tue Sep 15 1987 19:24 | 6 |
| I forgot to add something -- if anyone is interested (and please
tell me if you are), I will enter the messages we receive each week.
Would anyone like me to do that?
Carla
|
476.36 | | DECWET::MITCHELL | The Disney Channeler | Tue Sep 15 1987 19:39 | 8 |
| RE: .34
Must have taken a long time to spell all that out letter-by-letter.
John M.
|
476.37 | | SNOV17::MYNOTT | | Tue Sep 15 1987 20:18 | 5 |
| re: 35
Yes please, I for one would love to hear more messages.
...dale
|
476.38 | | NONODE::JOLLIMORE | | Wed Sep 16 1987 08:42 | 5 |
| .35 Carla;
I'd be interested. Yes, please do.
Jay
|
476.39 | | AKOV68::FRETTS | Shine your Spirit! | Wed Sep 16 1987 10:12 | 6 |
|
Me too, Carla.
Carole
|
476.40 | | SPIDER::PARE | What a long, strange trip its been | Wed Sep 16 1987 12:20 | 1 |
| Me too Carla
|
476.41 | Put me on the list ..... | WITNES::DONAHUE | | Wed Sep 16 1987 13:14 | 1 |
| Me, too, Carla!
|
476.42 | | MTBLUE::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Wed Sep 16 1987 13:25 | 36 |
|
Thank-you Carla,my impatience is calmed for now ;^)
I also would like to have the messages written in here each week.
Would it be possible to give you some questions to ask?
If you are interested i have hundreds of pages of material that
has come across the board in the past year.I would enter some of
it here(more interesting stuff),if you want.
I do disagree with what you say about the soul.I believe that the
soul is male or female,but not neither or both.This is only my belief
and not backed up by any real definite proof.You did state that
it was a fact,therefore it must be supported by evidence.What evidence
do you have to back up your statement?
There was some other questions i had asked you earlier that you
havn't answered as yet.Would you check my earlier responses to see
which ones you could answer for me?I am really quite interested
in your work and want to compare notes.
As far as experiments go,I am not a scientist and therefor probably
would not do as they would do,but in place of getting too complex
about it,i think some simple tests could be done to get a better
idea of what might be taking place.
So i will put this question out to whoever wants to respond to it:
How would you explain being talked to in German,a language niether
my wife or i have ability to speak,then having it translated to
us,then later we verify the translation as correct?
Enough for now.
PEACE
MICHAEL
|
476.43 | It's An Earful 8-) | BARAKA::BLAZEK | | Wed Sep 16 1987 15:53 | 82 |
| First I would like to say that if I said something was a
"fact," I only meant it as being my belief. I'm in no way
trying to convince you to embrace my beliefs, so I apologize
for stating it that way.
Michael, I went back and re-read your entries in 476, and I
will answer the questions I haven't yet. But please know
that I am still very much in a "seeking" mode myself, and
sometimes haven't explored certain things as much as I
eventually will. 8-) So...
re: .11 << Did you ask for verification of the spirits claim
about who he is? >>
No I did not, mainly because I don't feel the need to. Maybe
I'm too unquestioning sometimes -- there are parts of me
that DO doubt -- but there is ONE part of me that knows, and I
suppose that's where my truths and comforts lie. I don't feel
that I would be a positive energy myself if I were to start
firing questions at St. Germaine or any of the entities who
come to our group -- we are there to learn, love, relax, and
just BE. This is why we quietly receive an initial lengthy
message each week. We all have and ask questions, but mainly
we try to give more than we take, and that includes giving to
the entities what THEY seek -- trust and love. So, in summary,
we don't ask for verification, and even if we did I don't quite
understand how they could "prove" anything. The purpose to
this lifetime of mine is learning to trust and accept (this
is something I know), and that does not only include other
human beings.
re: .15 << Do you contact other spirits on the board and do
they give any history of their life on earth? >>
We do contact several other entities, but as I've said before
they are on the highest plane. I do not know very much about
them. Helos is a very high/positive entity who is the spiritual
guide to one of the women at my group. BK (I'll give you his
full name tomorrow) is a no nonsense entity who does not beat
around the bush -- very intense, but still loving. One night
I got an anonymous entity who just filled me with the most
INCREDIBLE energy -- and he moved the planchette around with
such force that I thought it might break. He would not identify
himself, and Germaine would not reveal to us who he was either.
That was a little strange, but it was still a positive thing.
Germaine did say that he was a lord of the universe (I don't know
what that means).
In summary of that (boy, I'm really long-winded today!), I've
never contacted someone who said "I used to be so-and-so."
re: .42 << Would it be possible to give you some questions to
ask? >>
Yes, of course. But they must be positive, or I won't ask them.
re: .I forgot the number:
You asked about receiving a message in German and then verifying
the translation. My thoughts on this are simple. The contacting
of entities (spirits) does not only occur in the U.S. and England.
It is worldwide and it is inconceivable for me to believe that
Germaine contacts a German or Swedish group in English. The
entities can contact you in whatever language it is you speak --
remember WHERE and WHAT they are! They know no boundaries, as
we do in the human form.
And finally, I wanted to add a comment about the gender of our
soul. The theory that I believe in has to do with soulmates, and
that is this: at one time our soul was WHOLE. Then, in order to
experience life as a human being, it was necessary for our soul to
split so that at the same or different times we could both incarnate
and experience life simultaneously as different sexes. I'm afraid
I'm not explaining this very well, but I've never known anybody
whose soulmate was of the same sex. And for the record, my
soulmate IS a man!
But it's all in what and how you believe, so PLEASE COMMENT on
what I wrote and maybe someone out there can offer some theories
a little clearer than mine. If not, I hope I've given everybody a
big enough earful!
|
476.44 | Subconscious polyglotalism | PBSVAX::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Wed Sep 16 1987 16:06 | 59 |
| RE: .42
I would not presume to explain it, I do not have enough information.
I *can* present some possible alternative explanations, along with
my personal evaluation of how likely each is, a priori. I would
absolutely reject none of them (this is, by the way, not meant to be
a complete list of possible explanations).
1) Spiritist -- you have been in contact with a spirit who knows German
(personal evaluation of probability: very, very low).
2) Parapsychological -- one or the other of you found the right words
by means of ESP (personal evaluation of probability: low).
3) Cryptonesiac -- one or the other of you have subconsciously picked
up enough German to create this effect. (personal evaluation of
probability: very high).
I know the third possibility sounds fantastic -- and it is. Never
the less, we all are geniuses enough -- subconsciously -- to
accomplish it. I have a report (in a recent issue of, I think, the
Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, but perhaps
it was the Journal of Parapsychology) which describes a similar case.
A man underwent (spontaneously, after hypnotic induction) past-lives
regression. He "became" a WWI French fighter-pilot. Although he
normally spoke no French, and knew no-one who did, he spoke French with
seeming ease. He revealed an apparent knowledge of many obscure
facts, many of which, when checked out turned out to be true.
However, the investigator demonstrated quite conclusively that all the
facts which were correct were hidden memories. Facts which he had no
opportunity to have seen he simply was wrong about.
The speaking of French? When a native French-speaking linguist
listened to the tapes, she pointed out that although seemingly quite
fluent, the vocabulary was actually quite small. All the words were
ones likely to be found in comic books and war movies (both of which
the "channel" was into). There was a heavy emphasis on English
cognates (i.e., French words which are similar to the equivalent
English words) which are easier for an English speaker to remember.
The grammar was poor -- frequently it was English grammar with French
words substituted. The "channel" was completely unaware of any of
this.
[I may have details of the above incorrect, but the whole is pretty
much as I've summarized it.]
Many people are unaware of how few words are really needed to
communicate fluently. The entire Bible, for example, has been
translated into a subset of English, called Basic English, which
contains only 1000 words. The same artificial dialect has been
used to translate and to write many other documents. I have, for
example, a book entitled "The Basic English Dictionary of Science".
If you are free to say only what you know how to say, a much smaller
vocabulary still would be adequate.
Topher
|
476.45 | Even more | BAXTA::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Thu Sep 17 1987 13:25 | 40 |
| Thank-you Carla for your response to my questions.I am a lot less
accepting than you.I always question,and in that way i learn a lot
more about things.I have been using the Ouija for a year now and
i am still asking many questions and learning a lot in the process.
I dont always agree with things that i am told by the spirits.My
contacts tell me they are in Hell and i also talk with other spirits
who say they are from the higher level and come to the lower level
to help.
Would you please ask the spirits if they know of a man called Robert
Green and what they can tell you about him.
Also ask about Jesus and his work there.
Heres a good one:I was told the last time i talked on the board
that Charles Manson is the same spirit as Jack the Ripper.Also that
Adolph Hitler escaped from Germany and lived in Argentina until
his death.I was also given the name of the man who was Jack the
Ripper.Of course i dont have any way to confirm any of this and
it really doesnt mean much,but i thought it was interesting.
Topher,I read that story about the French pilot.You sent it to me
a while back.It was interesting,but inconclusive.What would be your
explanation of how the plancette moves?I hope you dont say vibrations
in your fingers,otherwise how could you explain the plancette being
pulled right out of your hand,and also how could vibrations do 360
degree turns?
Carla,what do the masters say about reincarnation?
I believe in soul mates,my wife is mine.I believe when the spirit
is split that you are male/female and you remain that way.
Carla,what do you think about my suggestion to have two different
people use the board?there seems to be a common person.Did the
gentleman who is always on the board start your group?
Peace
Michael
|
476.46 | Dad, call home | TOPDOC::SLOANE | Bruce is on the loose | Thu Sep 17 1987 14:39 | 7 |
| Try to contact my father. He died about 15 years ago, and, a skeptic
to the end, he claimed he would get in contact if it were at all
possible.
I've been waiting.
-bs
|
476.47 | AN INTERESTING STORY | USMRM1::MMCCARTHY | | Thu Sep 17 1987 17:02 | 55 |
| MY BROTHER HAS USED A QUIJA BOARD FOR THE PAST SEVEN YEARS OFF AND ON.
HIS FIRST EXPERINCE WAS WHAT HOOKED HIM. THE MESSAGE WAS SUPPOSEDLY
FROM A HIGHER PLANE THAN MOST. THE POINTER WAS MOVING SO FAST THAT
THEY ONLY HAD TIME TO RIGHT LETTERS DOWN. THEY THEN TRIED TO BREAK
IT INTO WORDS AFTERWARD. MUCH OF THE MESSAGE SPOKE OF A LOVING GOD
AND THAT OUR PURPOSE WAS TO WORK TOWARD BELIEVING THAT. MANY OF
THE WORDS AND PHRASES WERE UNKNOWN TO MY BROTHER, BUT HE BROUGHT
HIS NOTES TO A ENGLISH PROFESSOR AT CLARK UNIVERSITY WHO HELPED
WITH DEFINITIONS ETC.
FROM THAT MOMENT ON HE WAS HOOKED, HE BOUGHT HIS OWN BOARD AND WITH
HIS WIFE BEGAN TO RECORD HIS SESSIONS, THEN TRANSCRIBE THEM TO PAPER.
ALL OF US WERE QUITE SKEPTICAL BUT WE DECIDED THAT WHEATHER IT WERE
REALLY SPIRITS THEY WERE CONTACTING OR A SIDE OF OUR SUBCONSCIOUS
IT WAS WORTH THE EFFORT. FOR THE FIRST FEW YEARS THERE WERE MANY,
WHAT WE CALLED POLTERGIST, WHICH WERE PEOPLE WHO WOULD LIE OR SWEAR
ON THE BOARD. ONE DAY MY MOTHER AND BROTHER WERE DOING THE BOARD
WHILE MY SKEPTICAL FATHER WAS WATCHING. "SUPOSSEDLY" MY IT WAS
WAS MY FATHER'S UNCLE ON THE BOARD. WE ASKED MY FATHER TO ASK HIM
SOMETHING THAT ONLY HE COULD KNOW. WHEN THE SPIRIT PRODUCED THE
RIGHT ANSWER (WHAT TOWN WAS HIS BROTHER KILLED IN THE WAR) MY DAD
TURNED WHITE AS A GHOST.
THERE WERE MANY OTHER VERY INTERESTING SESSIONS IN THOSE FIRST FEW
YEARS BUT A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO "CHARLES" APPEARED ON THE BOARD.
CHARLES WAS FROM ENGLAND AND SPOKE IN A ENGLISH ACCENT. HE CALLED
US BLOKES & CHAPS. HE TALKED ABOUT THE WENCHES HE HAD MET IN THE
PUBS OF LONDON. MY BROTHER HAD JUST MOVED TO GRAFTON WHEN CHARLES
FIRST APPEARED. ONE DAY HE SAID THERE WAS SOMEONE WITH HIM THAT
USED TO BE FROM GRAFTON. HE DID'NT COME ON THE BOARD BUT HE GAVE
THE MAN'S NAME, DATE OF BIRTH, AND WIFES NAME. MY BROTHER WENT
DOWN TO THE CEMENTARY (WHICH HE & HIS WIFE HAD NEVER BEEN TO)
AND FOUND THIS MAN'S GRAVESTONE WHICH WAS EXACTLY RIGHT.
OVER A PERIOD OF SEVERAL MONTH'S CHARLES ADMITTED THAT IT WAS
NOT BY ACCIDENT THAT HE HAD COME TO THERE BOARD. HE BEGAN TO
TELL THEM THAT THEY HAD BEEN RELATED TO HIM IN A PRIOR LIFE.
HE GAVE THEM THEIR NAMES AND A TOWN IN NEW HAMPSHIRE WHERE
THEY HAD LIVED. HE ALSO GAVE THEM THEIR OLD DATES OF BIRTH ETC.
MY BROTHER AND SOME FRIENDS TRAVELED TO THE TOWN (WHICH THEY
HAD NEVER EVEN HEARD OF) AND LO & BEHOLD FOUND BIRTH RECORDS
OF EVERYTHING CHARLES HAD TOLD THEM. CHARLES TOLD THEM THAT
THE REASON HE HAD DONE THAT WAS TO GAIN THEIR TRUST. HE TOLD
MY BROTHER THAT HE WAS HIS SPIRITUAL QUIDE AND THAT IS WHY
HE HAD COME TO THEIR BOARD.
SINCE THEN THEY HAVE TALKED ABOUT MANY SUBJECTS INCLUDING
SOMETHING CALLED "LAY LINES" AND THE VARIOUS PLANES OF THE
SPIRIT WORLD ETC. IT IS ALL VERY POSITIVE AND USUALLY VERY
SPIRITUAL. LIKE I SAID WE HAVE ALWAYS KEPT AN OPEN MIND AS
TO WEATHER THIS IS REAL OR SUBCONSCIOUS BUT EITHER WAY IT
HAS BEEN EXTREMELY FASCINATING.
MICHAEL
ACCENT. HE WAS FROM 19TH CENTURY LONDON.
|
476.48 | | AKOV68::FRETTS | Shine your Spirit! | Thu Sep 17 1987 17:56 | 11 |
|
Re: .46
Bruce,
What means have you used to allow your father to communicate?
What have you tried? I'm sincerely interested.
Carole
|
476.49 | RE: An intesting story. | PBSVAX::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Thu Sep 17 1987 18:10 | 6 |
| RE: .47
Thanks, that is an interesting story (but please, DONT SHOUT).
Topher
|
476.50 | Curiosity overules... | VICKI::BUSTA | | Mon Sep 21 1987 15:54 | 4 |
|
re: .45 Curious. What was the name given to you as to who Jack
the Ripper was?
|
476.51 | Keeping It Safe | BARAKA::BLAZEK | | Mon Sep 21 1987 18:02 | 28 |
| re: .45
In response to the question: "What do the masters say about
reincarnation?", I think you'll find that it's what you've
been hearing all along -- we continue to incarnate as humans
in order to learn the lessons we have not yet learned. That,
of course, is an extremely simplified version, but sometimes
the basics that are the easiest to accept.
I haven't asked the questions posed by Michael in .45 yet,
but I will. I really must consider the other members of my
group -- the "mood" has to be right and I always defer my
questions if someone else has some urgent ones. So please
know that I'm not putting you off (and I know you're im-
patient!), but please try to understand.
I've never heard of being contacted by someone from Hell.
What is the atmosphere in the room like when they are
communicating on the Board? Do you personally believe in
Hell? If it disturbs you to communicate with them (it would
me), envision yourself surrounded by the White Light and say:
"I transmute all that is less than Christ's perfection."
Carla
P.S. Are you in a prayerful state before using the Board?
|
476.52 | An open mind | GERBIL::MORAN | When money speaks the truth is | Tue Sep 22 1987 17:01 | 6 |
| Having my BS in Accounting I find it very difficult to believe that
there is not a logical explanation to what is happening when one
uses the Ouija board (however I certainly can't think of one).
As I am somewhat skeptical (very ignorant of the subject) would
it be possible to observe some people on the Ouija board? This
topic and people's experiences has aroused my curiousity. Any takers?
|
476.53 | "The Board" on reincarnation | MIST::IVERSON | It's all been said before, but... | Thu Sep 24 1987 00:18 | 21 |
| re : request for ouija reincarnation info
My only expeience with "the board" is indirectly and from quite
a few years ago before my eyes were opened to the possibility that
not all experiences have textbook explanations.(i.e. I was a skeptic:-)
A sister of a friend of mine was in contact with a "spirit" and
we considered it "entertaining" to hear the latest info from the
world beyond. (She on the other hand was quite serious about this.)
One statement that for some reason has always stuck in my mind dealt
with reincarnation. According to the entity we are born in the "sun
sign" as our last time of death. So that our date of death determines
our astrological entry point for our next life.
Any confirmation on this from other "entities"? Of course accepting
that statement assumes you consider ouija, entities, reincarnation,
and astrology plausible, which blows it out of the water for most
people right away anyway. ;-)
Thom
|
476.54 | AT LEAST INTERESTING | MTBLUE::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Thu Sep 24 1987 13:02 | 33 |
| Hello all,
Its been a weird week.Seems like there has been an extra amount
of problems to deal with all around.
I was given the name of Jack the Ripper and i will look through
my notes and print it here,hopefully tomorrow.
I have used the white light ever since i started to use the board.It
has been noticed several times by the spirits i talk to.My religous
beliefs have always been more or less agnostic,but in the last 5
years have become more a combination of Christian and mystic.
I have been told that reincarnation is possible on the higher levels
(that is,higher than what we would refer to as hell),but,it is a
choice of the individual and according to their progression.I was
told that you stay in the same family and that members of your family
in the spirit world keep track of you until you return,at which
time,someone will meet you as you make the transition.I was also
told that I have lived 10 lifetimes and my main spirit contact claims
to be my father in a previous life,which occured in the late 1700s.
He tells me a lot of stories about his life and times.He also talks
alot about what i was like and the things i would do,etc.I have
also talked with my first wife(died in 1986) and had many conversations
with her before she moved to a higher level.I am in contact with
a spirit who claims to have been Moses,The Prophet Joseph Smith(Mormon
prophet)and a catholic bishop by the name of Robert Green,who resided
in Baltimore.
If not true,at least interesting :^)
PEACE
Michael
|
476.55 | | DECWET::MITCHELL | Memory drugs: just say ..uh.. | Thu Sep 24 1987 17:24 | 6 |
| RE: .54
Mike, ask Joseph Smith if he was right.
John M.
|
476.56 | MORE | MTBLUE::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Fri Sep 25 1987 08:05 | 23 |
| I had some trouble entering my note yesterday.I got cut off by the
system.I will try again.
I have limited time to talk with Robert Green,who says he was Moses
and Joseph Smith,he is always in a rush to do other things.I did
ask him about his vision and he told me that Jesus Christ did appear
to him but,that the Father did not.He said he made a mistake about
the Father,and that only Jesus Christ appeared.I havnt been able
to question him much,its hard to get in touch with him.I have to
set up times with him,and then i only get a few minutes to talk.
My contact Jim told me that Jack the Rippers name was Walter Benjamin
Turner and that he committed suicide and had his body cremated by
a friend.
Jim also said that he knew of the person that calls himself ST
Germaine. He said that he is a dangerous person and is trying to
get people in his confidence to control them.Be very careful Carla,
of this.Do you discuss religion with St. Germaine and if so,what
is his attitude?
PEACE
MICHAEL
|
476.57 | Help! It's Deep Stuff! | BARAKA::BLAZEK | | Wed Sep 30 1987 12:36 | 22 |
| Don't know whether this should go in 499 or here, but I
decided to put it here...
The other night, for the first time, I was able to use the
Ouija Board by myself! I was feeling INCREDIBLE energy
within myself so decided to give it a go. It took a while
for the entities to assimilate my energy field, but once they
"got used to me" the messages just flowed and flowed. Much
of what I got was personal and about my soulmate, and that in
itself is another topic for discussion. Anyway, I got the
following message -- it is in relation to soulmates -- and I
am really having a hard time interpreting it. So here it is:
"Our botanicals are biomagnetic bonds which bond and
sometimes make blood contact an ionic attachment in a
non-mobile atmosphere."
The word *blood* was defined as *life*, and was referenced to
more than once.
Carla
|
476.58 | Beats me. | PBSVAX::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Wed Sep 30 1987 14:37 | 7 |
| RE: .57
I'm pretty sure that its nonesense on a literal level, so you'll
have to deal with it on a symbolic level. Symbols are very individual
things.
Topher
|
476.59 | Can the Oiuja entities channel? | PUZZLE::GUEST_TMP | HOME, in spite of my ego! | Wed Sep 30 1987 20:57 | 16 |
| Carla--
Have you every asked any of these spirits if they could channel
through one of the members of your group? Also, why or why not?
This weekend I picked up some tapes of St. Germaine from my
girlfriend's hairdresser. I started to listen this morning but
I dozed off. I get the same feelings I get listening to this that
I get from Ramtha or from my very brief observation of Mafu. It's
interesting how very similar the language and the accents are and
also the "tone." I will make an effort to listen to the entirity
of the two tapes I borrowed; until then I am not terribly qualified
to talk about this St. Germaine.
Frederick
|
476.60 | | DECWET::MITCHELL | Memory drugs: just say ..uh.. | Thu Oct 01 1987 04:46 | 7 |
| Problem with St. Germaine:
Elizabeth Clair Prophet claims to be the reincarnation of St Germaine
(who was not a saint, BTW). How then can he be a discarnate entity?
John M.
|
476.61 | Well, .... maybe.... | MANTIS::PARE | What a long, strange trip its been | Thu Oct 01 1987 10:50 | 9 |
| Maybe Elizabeth Clair Prophet is wrong. Maybe the essence of what
the being "St Germaine" is cannot be contained in a single entity.
Maybe the personality entitled "St Germaine" exists in a series
of component souls that together form the known sentient intelligence.
Maybe discarnate entities are not "people", as we know them, but
rather pure thought/emotion. Maybe on the level of conciousness
that St Germaine is at, he is not limited by the physical laws of
our universe. There must be a myriad of possibile answers for that
question... lets think about them for awhile.
|
476.62 | | SSDEVO::ACKLEY | No final answers here | Thu Oct 01 1987 16:17 | 15 |
|
I think Elizabeth Claire Prophet is "channeling" St. Germain.
In her books I have run across no reference to her being his
reincarnation. Since she says St. Germain is an "Ascended Master",
the implication is that he has advanced beyond the need to
incarnate. She has written many channeled books, only a few of
which are "by" St. Germain.
I suppose there is no final way to "prove" that a given
channeled entity is the same as an entity coming through another
channel, even if the same name is used. Even if he were to
materialize in my room, I might still entertain sceptical doubts.
The only indisputable fact here is that St. Germain has become
a part of the New Age mythology.
Alan.
|
476.63 | | SSDEVO::YOUNGER | This statement is false | Thu Oct 01 1987 17:35 | 8 |
| re: (John)
There is no reason that an entity that is currently incarnated cannot
also exist on a spiritual level, and speak to other people as the
previous incarnation.
Elizabeth
|
476.64 | Drop that Shell, Stranger! | NEXUS::MORGAN | Welcome to the Age of Flowers | Thu Oct 01 1987 19:39 | 9 |
| Reply to .60; Mitchell,
One explaination is that a deceased person leaves a shell on the
etheric or astral plain, much like peeling an onion, after an
individual departs physical life. Some think this shell can be
communicated with by sensitive individuals.
In the model of reincarnation I'm contemplating, one could drop shells
and still reincarnate over a period of time.
|
476.65 | Shell game | DECWET::MITCHELL | Memory drugs: just say ..uh.. | Thu Oct 01 1987 21:02 | 15 |
| RE:.63
Sorry, Elizabeth, I don't buy it. If that's the case then I claim
that I also exist "out there" and hereby challenge any DEJAVUer who so
dares to channel me.
I promise unparalleled wisdom!
RE: .64 (Mikie)
What is this shell of which you speak? Bodies?
John M.
|
476.66 | Shells and great wonders... | NEXUS::MORGAN | Welcome to the Age of Flowers | Thu Oct 01 1987 22:07 | 15 |
| Reply to .65; Mitchell;
Theoreticlly, as far as I can make out, these shells are like core
memory that retains a charge after power is turned off. Actually
that is a bad methapor because no charge is retained if the core
is taken away completely.
I think I have experienced at least two shells in OOBE's. The first
shell retains some resemblence of human life or memory of life. The
other was more like a free electon, zooming about with no care or
concern. (Does this give new meaning to "free electron shell"?? B^)
Yeah right, unparalleled wisdom. I certainly hope you've been stocking
up on Doonesbury for this extravaganza. B^) BTW, could you, by chance,
give us a peek of what's in store for Doonesbury tomarrow?
|
476.67 | :-) | SPIDER::PARE | What a long, strange trip its been | Thu Oct 01 1987 22:37 | 4 |
| RE .65
You DO already exist out there John .... and I accept your challenge
to channel you. I will conduct my first channelling session tonight.
Stay tuned for the results.
|
476.68 | | AKOV11::FRETTS | Shine your Spirit! | Fri Oct 02 1987 10:10 | 6 |
|
I can't wait for this!
C.
|
476.69 | | FSLENG::JOLLIMORE | For the greatest good... | Fri Oct 02 1987 10:18 | 8 |
| .67 (Re: .65)
*I* ws gonna say that. John, I agree with mary, you do exsist 'out
there'. Or rather your higher self exists out there. But, I believe only
you can channel you, (or your higher self) [no, not the kind of higher].
I would like to see Mary channel you though, could be interesting ;')
Jay
|
476.70 | OK, c'mon! I'm waiting! | MASTER::EPETERSON | | Fri Oct 02 1987 14:04 | 1 |
|
|
476.71 | Some people think I'm already in the ozone layer | DECWET::MITCHELL | Memory drugs: just say ..uh.. | Fri Oct 02 1987 14:12 | 53 |
| RE: .65
Oh Mikie, come out of your shell! :-)
> BTW, could you, by chance, give us a peek of what's in store for
Doonesbury tomarrow? <
No. I can't stand Doonesbury.
RE: .67 (Pare)
> You DO already exist out there John .... and I accept your
challenge to channel you. I will conduct my first channelling session
tonight. Stay tuned for the results. <
Hmmmm.... Now that I've seen this, maybe YOU'RE the reason I had such a
lousy sleep! I had nightmares all night that I was living in a haunted
house and I was "possessed."
Next you'll be sending a crystal salesman to my door. ;-)
RE: .69 (Jay)
> I would like to see Mary channel you though, could be interesting ;')
<
You'll know she has been successful if she:
1. Begins to babble coherently
2. Goes on food binges and develops a love for '78 red Zinfandels from
the San Luis Obispo region
3. Becomes obsessed with her weight
4. Starts "interpreting" for dogs
5. Starts annoying SOAPBOX readers with incessant animal rights tirades
6. Starts "correcting" Topher and Frederick
7. Can't get enough of cheap horror flicks
Maybe Mary will reconsider now. Don't say I didn't warn her! ;-)
John M.
|
476.72 | Assumptions. | PBSVAX::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Fri Oct 02 1987 16:51 | 7 |
| RE: Last bunch
Why do you assume, John, that you would recognize your "higher self"
if channeled through another?
Topher
|
476.73 | You mean that's not me in the mirror when I shave? | DECWET::MITCHELL | Memory drugs: just say ..uh.. | Fri Oct 02 1987 17:31 | 9 |
| RE: .72
The same way I recognize my right foot, obviously.
Really, Topher, if I can't recognize myself then who can? If such
is the case then anyone could say ANYTHING and claim it came from
my higher self.
John M.
|
476.74 | Mary, contrary, and John | PUZZLE::GUEST_TMP | HOME, in spite of my ego! | Fri Oct 02 1987 18:33 | 17 |
| re: last two
(Poor Mary, keep on rolling...)
What I think Topher means is that what you described is *you*
(the "limited self" *you* that Lazaris talks about.) Your Higher
Self is responsible for ALL of your incarnations, so it could very
well pass on to Mary your life as Omar the tentmaker or Snafu,
the killer tomato, etc.
So, if you wish to have Mary channel *you* then you need to
depart from your body for a little while.
For all of you who know Mary, if you find her doing strange
things in the Men's room, we'll have this to use as "proof" of why
that could have happened.
Frederick
|
476.75 | Soul in search of a guest home | DECWET::MITCHELL | Memory drugs: just say ..uh.. | Fri Oct 02 1987 21:21 | 12 |
| Whoa, Frederick! Are you saying I do strange things in the Men's
room?! ;-)
OK, Mary can get in touch with me and tell me when to leave my body.
Then she is free to channel me. I promise not to give away any
of her secrets, (bust size etc.) after I take over her body. Deal?
Maybe it would be a better idea for YOU to channel me, Frederick.
Then again, Lazaris would NEVER forgive you! :-)
John M.
|
476.76 | | FSLENG::JOLLIMORE | For the greatest good... | Mon Oct 05 1987 14:11 | 10 |
| .71 John
>2. ........................develops a love for '78 red Zinfandels from
> the San Luis Obispo region
Red or blush? Any specific label(s)?
In case Mary DOES channel you, we need specifics! (Also, I'm always in
search of good California wine.)
Jay
|
476.77 | Distinguishing your right foot from your elbow | PBSVAX::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Mon Oct 05 1987 14:17 | 20 |
| RE: .73
You recognize your right foot, not because it shines out with
"you-ness" but because you have seen it before. I've been watching
my daughter learning to recognize her own body and that it is
connected to her. Very much of a learning process.
Presumably, you've never seen your higher self directly.
As for me, I sometimes have trouble recognizing things I wrote only
a couple of years earlier (though I may remember writing it).
Presumably, what I wrote reflects, in content and style, part of
my personality. I would expect my "higher self" if it exists, to be
less recognizable than something I can actually remember writing.
In scientific terms, I don't see how this experiment can be conclusive
(though, like some other experiments John which has proposed recently,
it may have *interesting* inconclusive results).
Topher
|
476.78 | Help... | CURIE::TZELLAS | | Mon Oct 05 1987 14:47 | 10 |
|
I just bought a Ouija board last night. I was wondering if anyone
can give me some tips. I never used the board and I am a little
scared of it. How do you call a spirit? Can you call a particle
one? If anyone can give me some pointers, I would appreciate it.
Thanks,
Kathi
|
476.79 | back to .57 ... | EASEL::LIBRARIAN | just guessing | Tue Oct 06 1987 10:22 | 13 |
|
> "Our botanicals are biomagnetic bonds which bond and sometimes make
> blood contact an ionic attachment in a non-mobile atmosphere."
For some reason when I saw the word botanicals I immediately thought of
flowers. The reference to atmosphere continues to suggest flowers to me
due to their scent. Not knowing the context of your question other than
that it "is in relation to soulmates" it is hard to guess much more.
Are you searching for your soulmate? Could be the board is recommending
the use of a particular perfume or something.
Lance
|
476.80 | re: .59, .78, .79 | BARAKA::BLAZEK | | Wed Oct 07 1987 13:38 | 34 |
| re: .59
I don't think anybody in my group has ever specifically asked
any of our spiritual guides if any of us could channel any of
them. I know it hasn't been asked for as long as I've been
going. Interesting question, and I will ask that tonight at
my meeting.
re: .78
Kathi, please be sure that before each use of the Ouija board
you are in a prayerful state. You'll have to find your own
way to accomplish this, but I always meditate for at least a
half hour. Envision yourself being surrounded by the White
Light (or pink) and try asking for your spiritual guide. You
will feel the energy, and you will know immediately if you
*connect*. Please don't let fear enter into your mind, because
that may open you up to other less loving entities that are
out there. As in all circumstances of life, you get what you
seek -- if you are truly seeking love and peace you will never
have any problems on the Board.
re: .79
Thanks for your input! I'm not spiritually searching for my
soulmate - I know who he is on both the spiritual and physical
level. But physically I suppose I am searching for him, because
we have not yet physically met face to face in this lifetime.
I am searching for the right way *to* meet him.
Any other ideas??
Carla
|
476.81 | | DECWET::MITCHELL | Memory drugs: just say ..uh.. | Thu Oct 08 1987 01:59 | 12 |
| RE: .76 (Jay)
When I say RED Zinfandel I mean RED, not blush. White Zin is a waste of
a good grape (do you not agree?).
If Mary wants to channel me, she should wait till I'm over this virus.
Maybe if I had a crystal... :-).
John M.
|
476.82 | | FSLENG::JOLLIMORE | For the greatest good... | Thu Oct 08 1987 08:44 | 8 |
| .81 John, You *did* say red, sorry I didn't notice. White has it's place.
Not as flavorful as red, 'specially if you chill it. It's not a waste if
you take the skins and use them to make an extra deep red (or do they do
that only with pinot noir?).
What was the topic of the note??
Jay
|
476.83 | | BUMBLE::PARE | What a long, strange trip its been | Thu Oct 08 1987 12:04 | 3 |
| .81
I have to wait before I channel you John. Your higher self has
the flu...(or he may be hung over from all of that red wine)_:-)
|
476.84 | | HPSCAD::MBOLLAK | | Mon Mar 07 1988 13:42 | 18 |
|
I don't know if anyone is reading this note anymore, but I have only
recently discovered ouija and this note, so i will add my entry anyway.
I have been ouija-ing fairly regularly for the past week or two, with
some interesting results. I do it by myself. I have seemingly spoken
with a number of entities. Most of the things I have been told are
about the entity or about me. Almost all of the messages i have
gotten are either unverifiable (My name is Randy. I was killed by a
tiger in Sumatra in 1780.) or have yet to occur. The few things i have
been able to check are untrue. Some things i will know by the end of
the year. I have also gotten contradictory information. Once, when this
happened, I asked the entity if he was sure. He said, "no." I said, "are
you sure of anything?" He said, "yes. Nothing is sure." Many times i get
garbled letters interspersed with decipherable words. I have not been able
to get a correct answer to a question to which someone else already knows
the answer, and i do not.
-Marla
|
476.85 | Once again - warning to be careful | SSDEVO::YOUNGER | Enjoy your life. If you don't no one else will | Sat Mar 26 1988 22:32 | 8 |
| I would be very leery of any entity that was giving me obviously
bogus information - you've said some of what it has told you is
false. Please ask whomever you worship to protect you, and surround
yourself with a blue or white light when working with the Ouija
board. Or better yet - leave it alone. You may be calling up entities
that mean you harm. Please be careful.
Elizabeth
|
476.86 | Litmus Test for Entities | GRECO::ANDERSON | Home of the Convoluted Brain | Fri Sep 23 1988 12:48 | 31 |
| This note has been dormant for a while, but I thought I'd get some
feedback on an experience.
My fiance and I had talked about her experiences with the Ouija
and related matter. She worked the board regularly many years ago
until she discovered that the entity she had been conversing with
was malevolent. At that point she was instructed to burn "her"
board and the entity, who went by the name Cave (pronounced "ka vey"
would be cut off from further influencing her.)
Last night I went out and got a board, and we sat down with it. After
taking precautions suggested in this note, we almost immediately we
connected with a presence. This entity wished to be call "Lemen"
(pronounced "lee men"). Upon further questioning, Lemen said that she
has never taken human form (which suggests that her essence was
feminine rather than female as we know gender), and that she was the
entity of our new condominium. She also said that she knew Cave, but
that she wasn't afraid of him and that there were a couple of other
entities present. She also said that I was in my 6th life and that
my fiance was in her 5th life.
I have a couple of questions: Has anyone ever met Lemen? Has anyone
ever met Cave? Has anyone ever heard of an entity taking the form
of a condominium, not the entire building but just our unit (this
reminds me of the fairy tales about Tomptas, the resident spirts
of Swedish homes - I am 50% Swedish by genetics though I suspect
somewhat moreso by spirit.) I also want to make sure that Lemen
is benevolent or at least benign. Are there questions which one
can ask which "force" entities to reveal their true colors?"
All comments are appreciated.
|
476.87 | Condominium or cave dwellers. | WRO8A::WARDFR | Going HOME--as an Adventurer | Fri Sep 23 1988 12:59 | 10 |
| RE: -.1
If personal opinions matter, then mine is that the
spirit in question is pulling your leg. Often they start out
strong and interesting, then somewhere along the way once
their interest wanes, they change their tune. Either this one
is very confused or it's joshing with you, I think.
Frederick
|
476.88 | Somebody's got to be kidding... | ATLAST::LACKEY | Make haste slowly. | Fri Sep 23 1988 13:19 | 16 |
| I think Frederick's comment is very valid and maybe under emphasized.
Another miscellaneous comment, speaking in general terms and not
addressing any previous reply:
It never ceases to amaze me that there is such a strong tendency in
people to associate such power and intelligence with the disincarnate.
So much time is spent with Ouija boards, etc., trying to make contact
with those on the "other side", when the wisdom on *this side* has not
been spent and is so much more readily available and far more
verifiable.
Oh well, the grass is always greener... I guess. But it still amazes
me.
Jeff
|
476.89 | Perhaps a play-on-words, but not a joke. | PBSVAX::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Fri Sep 23 1988 14:28 | 25 |
| I don't think that a joke is involved, at least in the usual sense
of the word. This type of "connection" is very common in channeling
as well as in subconscious material (this similarity is easily
explained if you believe, as I do, that they are the same thing).
Cav� --> cave --> a-spirit-of-a-dwelling is quite unremarkable.
The concept of a minor deity or spirit associated with a dwelling
is a common one throughout the world. I rather suspect that
in modern cultures which continue to take the concept seriously
you would find an equal number of such household deities in
apartments and condos as in the private homes of people matched
in education and socio-economic class. Such spirits are typically
more associated with the "home" than with the "house": while the
structure is part of the association the people who live there are
also an important component.
The word "leman", by the way, is an obsolete term meaning "sweetheart"
(gender non-specific). A much older meaning of the term (archaic
rather than simply obsolete, to use the lexographers distinction)
is a specifically illicit lover. Offhand I don't know but I rather
suspect that the plural of "leman" is "lemen", if this is so and
if this is the source of the personalities name, then we have another
plural personality (very common in channeling).
Topher
|
476.90 | Lemen is Phonetic for Leman | GRECO::ANDERSON | Home of the Convoluted Brain | Fri Sep 23 1988 16:45 | 6 |
| I just looked up the word "leman" and sure enough, it is an archaic
word meaning 1. Lover. 2 Mistress. It is from Old English/Germanic
which accounts for "Lemen's" affirmative response to our question
as to if she was "german". In the appendix of the dictionary, the
lexography (is that the corect word) traces to the latin forms of
libere, meaning to be dear, and libido, meaning pleasure and desire.
|
476.91 | IDIOT ENTITIES | USACSB::OPERATOR_CB | DO WHAT THOU WILT | Sat Sep 24 1988 03:39 | 14 |
|
If boards are somehow connected to spirits, and your board only
receives this one spirit, does that mean that you have in a weird
sort of way........"bought a Lemon?"
Remember...Just because they dont have a body doesn't mean
they are smart.
"finding true colors"
I dont know but some interesting questions would be...
Q. Why is she connected to the condo?
Q. where was she before here?
Craig-no-rest-for-the-wicked-Brown.
|
476.92 | AN EXPERIMENT | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Mon Sep 26 1988 13:17 | 15 |
|
I have never heard of those entities.
You might ask it where it is,and,what is its purpose?
Are you interested in an experiment?If so,ask the entity if
it knows of "James Michaels" or "Robert Green".
Also ask it about "The red Room".
I am interested in the response you get.Are you interested?
Peace
Michael
|
476.93 | An Experiment It Is | GRECO::ANDERSON | Home of the Convoluted Brain | Mon Sep 26 1988 13:59 | 8 |
| Okay, I'll ask the question. We got on the board the next night,
and learned a bit more about "Lemen," in particular, that she is
a he and that he was pulling our leg. Consequently, I am not prone
to beleive much of what has been said. We'd ask a question and
Lemen would not answer directly, (s)he would make us guess at the
answer. Also, Cavey (prounounced ka vey) showed up and we had to
shoo him away so to speak.
|
476.94 | THIS COULD BE INTERESTING | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Mon Sep 26 1988 15:24 | 15 |
|
Great!also note any response other than written,that is,is the
plancette move to the bottom of the board,or,if a real quick response
is given.
There may be many entities involved here.I have spoken with at
least a dozen different ones.Each one has its own personality,and,
manner of manipulating the plancette.You can also tell emotional
state by the way they respond.
I'll be waiting to hear what happens.Thanks.
Peace
Michael
|
476.95 | Results of the Experiment | GRECO::ANDERSON | Home of the Convoluted Brain | Tue Sep 27 1988 11:48 | 235 |
| Michael,
Okay, we got on the board last night and here is what transpired. I
captured about 75% of the session on tape. Some of it makes sense and
some does not. I will enclose editorial comments in brackets "[]."
We meditated for a short period on the white light and a white room,
then we asked if any(one/thing) was present. We received something of
a tentative and halting "yes." I asked if it was Lemen, and it
responded, "yes." I asked if it knew what the "red room" was and it
responded "yes" in a tentative fashion. I asked, "what can you tell us
about the red room?" It spelled out "B-A-D" very precisely. I asked,
"Bad? Is that what you want to say? The red room is bad? Is the red
room bad?" It moved the plancette very quickly to "yes." The I asked,
"Do you want to talk about the red room?" It responded with a quick
sweeping "No." [This seemed like an emphatic "no." This particular
entity will make low, sweeping moves, almost down to the numberals,
between no and yes.] So then I asked, "Do you know a 'Robert Greene?'"
The entity moved the plancette back to yes, I do not remember the
quality of the motion, but on listening to the sliding sound on
the tape, it seems easy, smooth and reasonably quick.
[I'll continue in dialoge format from here on out. I will denote
my questions with "ME," my fiance's questions with "SO" and the
entity's parts with "ENTITY." This is condensed.]
ME "Tell us something about Robert Greene. Is Robert Greene in
the red room?"
ENTITY (Quick smooth move to no.)
ME "Was Robert Greene a person?"
ENTITY (Quick smooth move to yes.)
ME "Is he dead now?"
ENTITY (A looping move away from and then back to yes.)
ME "Did he die recently? [I don't recall the entity's
response, but I don't hear any significant sliding sounds on the
tape. Which I believe means a yes. Often this entity will not
move the plancette if the answer to the question is the same as
the answer to the previous question. It loops off and returns when
we are moving quickly through conversation, if you can call it that.]
ME "Do you know where I work?"
ENTITY (Quick smooth move to no.)
ME "Do you know any of the people I work with?"
ENTITY (Quick smooth move to yes.)
ME "Who?"
ENTITY "B
ME "Name the people I work with, who do I work with? Anyone."
ENTITY (Moved the plancette around, but couldn't seem to put
any coherence to the movement.)
ME "Can you tell us something about Robert Greene? Tell
us something about Robert Greene. Anything."
ENTITY "A"
ME "Tell us something about Robert Greene. Who is Robert
Greene?"
ENTITY "A B E N"
ME "Is N the last letter you told us?"
ENTITY (Quick smooth move to no.)
ME "What was the last letter?"
ENTITY "A"
ME "I'm going to ask you about all of the letters. Was
A the first letter."
ENTITY (Quick smooth move to yes.)
ME "Was B the second letter?"
ENTITY (Quick smooth move to yes.)
ME "Was E the third letter?"
ENTITY (Quick smooth move to yes.)
[This was a real struggle. I had to ask several times about the
letters. Finally, the entity got it out.]
ENTITY "A B E A N"
SO "BEAN?"
ME Is Robert Greene a bean?
ENTITY (Quick smooth move to yes.)
SO "Is that his form?"
ENTITY (Make a quick looping move away from and then back to
yes.)
[At this point we started to laugh.]
SO "What kind of a bean? A lima bean?"
ENTITY (Quick smooth loop yes.)
ME "Are you joking with us?"
ENTITY (Quick smooth loop yes.)
[We started laughing again.]
ME "Really, we want to know about Robert Green."
SO "Robert Green's a bean."
ME "A green bean, right?"
ENTITY (Quick smooth loop yes.)
ME "Very clever. I have a friend who asked me to ask about
Robert Green. Tell me something that I can tell my friend about
Robert Green. [We didn't get anything intelligible from this.]
SO "Do you know who Robert Green is?"
ENTITY (Quick smooth loop yes.)
SO "Is he dead?"
ENTITY (Quick smooth loop yes.)
SO "Does he have another form?"
ENTITY "B E A N"
ME "He's a bean."
ENTITY (Quick smooth loop yes.)
ME "Are you still joking?"
ENTITY (Quick smooth loop yes.)
ME "Do you think this is funny?"
ENTITY (Quick smooth loop yes.)
SO "Is this Cavey?"
ENTITY (Quick smooth loop yes, more emphatic than the others.)
ME "Would you please get out of here Cavey."
SO/ME "Lemen? Is Lemen there."
ENTITY (Smooth yes.)
ME "Do you know Robert Green?"
ENTITY (Away and then back to yes."
ME "What is Robert Green's form?"
ENTITY (The plancette moved around and around five or six times."
ME "A circle?"
ENTITY "B E A N"
SO "Who is this Robert Green guy?"
ME "I have no idea."
SO "Who asked you to ask about him?"
ME "This guy right here." I showed her the note.
SO "Okay, lets go. Let's ask it some good ones. Forget
this Robert Green. Lemen, are you there?
ENTITY (move to yes)
SO "Lemen, where are you?"
ENTITY H E R E
SO "ARe you here?"
ENTITY (Move to yes.)
SO "What is your purpose?"
ENTITY "N I N E"
Phonetically, nine is "no" in german, which supposedly is Leman's
ethnic background. The net of this conversation is that the entity
said that it had no purpose. We asked if the entity knew James
Michaels. It said yes that that James Michaels was alive and ninety
years old and knew Robert Green. Then we took a break.
After that we got into some religious/spiritual questions.
Unfortunately we did not record this part of the session. This part
makes me feel uncomfortable. We asked if there was a God and the
entity said "yes." When asked what it called it's god, it spelled the
word, "YAFON." I have no idea what that is or if it is even spelled
correctly. We asked some more questions and got some contradictory
answers around who this YAFON is and if YAFON is the God we know as
Jesus. The entity said that YAFON was not the God as we know him. I
started to ask questions about who the entity bows to and who it
serves. It said that it bowed to Jesus, but that it also bowed
to and served the the "angel of light." At that point my SO broke
off not wanting to get into that realm. However, I still want to
check out what I'm dealing with.
That's about it.
|
476.96 | Everybody wants to be a comedian/comedienne | WRO8A::WARDFR | Going HOME--as an Adventurer | Tue Sep 27 1988 12:28 | 10 |
| Recently a group (the name has at least temporarily slipped
my mind) released their version of an old Elvis song (actually,
there are no new Elvis songs so I guess that is redundant) ;-)
and, so, a local popular radio station has offered something
new...a version of the group's songs sung by Elvis...if you send
away for either tapes or compact discs, they will send you a
Ouija board along with your order.
Frederick
|
476.97 | To CONTINUE ON? | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Tue Sep 27 1988 13:54 | 39 |
|
ref .95
It seems like these entities understand about "the red room".Their
response is as I would expect from them if they had knowledge of
it.
Also it is obvious that they know the entities "Robert Green" and
"James Michaels",but,are very careful not to say anything about
them,and,managed to avoid it by playing games with you.
Usually when the plancette moves in circles or doesnt move in a
smooth manner,it is an indication of confusion on the part of the
entity,or agitation.
Its not likely they will say anymore about the entities i mentioned,
but,you could tell them that you know someone who is friends with
both of them,to see what the response is.Do not give them my name.
Here are some more questions if you wish to continue the experiment.
Who is in charge there?
Are you cold and in darkness?
Why are you there?
They may try to get you to tell them my name,so,be aware.
This may seem strange,but,this is DEJAVU,and,anything can happen
:^)
Thanks for the report,and,the detail of it.I will be awaiting the
results of your next session.Its very interesting already.
Peace
Michael
|
476.98 | Can You Put the Board on A Table? | GRECO::ANDERSON | Home of the Convoluted Brain | Tue Sep 27 1988 14:23 | 7 |
| The gating factor in continuing the experiment will be my SO's willingness
to do so. I do have a couple of questions.
1. Can you sit at a table with the board on the table rather than
on ones knees?
2. Any take on "YAFON" or anything close????
|
476.99 | | NEBVAX::PEDERSON | Keep watching the SKIES! | Tue Sep 27 1988 14:39 | 9 |
| pardon my ignorance, but....
what is the "red room"? Is it an evil place? Can someone
provide a little detail here or point me to where it is discussed
elsewhere? My curiosity was peaked with the entity's reaction
to "the red room"........
thanx
|
476.100 | Possibly... | PBSVAX::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Tue Sep 27 1988 14:42 | 3 |
| Is this the "red room" of The Shining?
Topher
|
476.101 | | JACOB::STANLEY | Steal your face right off your head... | Tue Sep 27 1988 14:57 | 7 |
| < Note 476.100 by PBSVAX::COOPER "Topher Cooper" >
> Is this the "red room" of The Shining?
Wasn't that "red rum"?
Dave
|
476.102 | MORE ON OUIJA | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Tue Sep 27 1988 15:27 | 30 |
|
Yes,you can put the board on the table,it will work fine.Also,
you need only use one hand.
The reason the entity reacted as it did,was,because,the "RED ROOM"
is a place of punishment.
The reason i have not said who Robert Green and James Michaels are,is,
so not to give any imformation that would spoil the experiment.
Now I can.Robert Green is an assistant to Jesus,and,James Michaels
is my Ouija Board contact.
I am a bit uncomfortable about saying very much,since,I have developed
a trust,that i donot want weakened.
It is very hard to know something,that,probably most people would
think is crazy.I take a risk revealing things like this.
I have plenty of evidence to show that I am in contact with spirits,
but,it is of a personal nature.I am not out to prove anything,just
to offer my knowledge to those who wish to receive it.
My experiment with Craig just gives me more of an understanding
of things in the other world.
Peace
Michael
|
476.103 | session report | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Wed Sep 28 1988 08:03 | 17 |
|
I communicated with my contact last night.I asked him about Lemen
and Cavey.He said he did not know them,but,that they might know
of him.He then said his master was there and he asked him.He said
his master knew them,but,would say nothing about them.
I asked him about YAFON.He said it was a code word,that,each letter
was a word.He said one letter was missing.It should be YAFONE.He
said it meant:You Are Frightned Of Nine Evils.Apparently a reference
to weaknesses.
He also said his "angel of light" was Satan.
Peace
Michael
|
476.104 | well, he was up front about it ... | MARKER::KALLIS | Anger's no replacement for reason | Wed Sep 28 1988 09:14 | 12 |
| re .103 (Michael):
>He also said his "angel of light" was Satan.
Two observations:
An alias for Satan is Lucifer, or light-bearer.
Any contact who says his "angel of light" is Lucifer/Satan, I'd
be a bit wary of.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
476.105 | wary of NINE? | POBOX::CROWE | I led the pigeons to the flag.. | Wed Sep 28 1988 16:49 | 14 |
| Something struck me as odd while I was reading these past notes,
so I've gone back and re-read some of the significant ones. Up
front I want to say that I have never used the board myself but
have a great deal of respect, curiosity and a touch of fear concerning
it.
In .95 ANDERSON's contact Lemen said it's purpose here was NINE.
It also said it bowed to Jesus but served the angel of light.
Mike later mentioned YAFONE and it's Nine Evils. Did anyone else
notice the "NINE" tie, or am I just seeing (well, reading :^} ) things?
Still curious --
Tracy
|
476.106 | NINE reference | NEBVAX::PEDERSON | Keep watching the SKIES! | Wed Sep 28 1988 17:03 | 6 |
| re: .105
Yeah, me too. I noticed that there was a reference to NINE.
What does that mean? Is Lemen one of the "nine evils" or
connected with evil in some way?
|
476.107 | Satan exists | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Thu Sep 29 1988 07:19 | 21 |
|
It is my belief that the Ouija board is used for monitoring and
to play on the weak,to gain control over them.I therefor,based on
my experience,consider it a tool of Satan.
The "nine evils"I believe,are weaknesses,that,if they could get
us to do,it would put us in Satans control.
What better tool than a game in the toy section.But then,Satan is
a very confident,clever entity.I have been told that he looks more
animal than human.I have had occasional short conversations with
him,because of my contacts position.I recall in one conversation
that he said to me: "You have a price,like all humans".He is very
confident that he can tempt anyone.He looks for your weakness.
All for now.
Peace
Michael
|
476.108 | "Un-be attitudes from sermon in the hole?" | USACSB::OPERATOR_CB | DO WHAT THOU WILT | Thu Sep 29 1988 07:32 | 9 |
|
RE. .107
Mike,
Would it be possible to get a list of what the "nine evils"
are??? I am not sure if they are beings or actions.
Craig
|
476.109 | EVIL DEEDS=LOWEST PLANE | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Thu Sep 29 1988 11:10 | 15 |
|
Craig,
I will have to ask my contact next time about it.He will be gone
for a week(he didnt say what for or where).I suspect they would
be actions that would cause us to be on the lowest plane,which is
controlled by Satan.Murder would be one evil.Suicide would also
cause us to be in his domain,although,most people who commit suicide
dont stay long and are not mixed with those who do worse things,
like murder.
Peace
Michael
|
476.110 | | ASIC::HURLEY | | Thu Sep 29 1988 12:52 | 6 |
| When I was a young girl probably ten or eleven I used the board
and innocently asked if Satan was there. I got a yes reply and
I'll tell you it scare me silly. That was the last time I use
it.
Denise
|
476.111 | Suicides | SCOPE::PAINTER | Wonders never cease. | Thu Sep 29 1988 14:53 | 20 |
|
Michael,
Would you please elaborate on your mention of suicide and how it
ties in with Satan? I'm curious about this connection because...
I happen to believe that all deaths are ultimately suicides, and
believe that we all choose our time and method of 'death', no matter
how unconsciously. There was a time when I didn't/couldn't believe
this, however I've seen too many of my relatives recently who were in
the process of deciding to leave this life, speaking of relatives who
had passed on, reminiscing of their youth, etc., and then subsequently
'dying' of 'natural' causes. The most recent one was my husband's
grandmother. I knew that the one thing she was living for had taken
place in her life (a family reconciliation) and at that point it was
only a matter of time. I even told my husband this and sure enough,
she passed away peacefully a week later. Something very similar
happened with my grandfather a few years earlier.
Cindy
|
476.112 | | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Thu Sep 29 1988 15:37 | 13 |
|
Cindy,
From my experience and investigation,I believe,that if we take
our own life,knowing exactly what we are doing,we will initially
place ourselves on the lowest level plane,where Satan has dominion.
However,I believe that such souls are isolated and are visited by
souls from the higher level,to explain and prepare them to advance
higher,once they have served their time there.
Peace
Michael
|
476.113 | | CSC32::WOLBACH | | Thu Sep 29 1988 16:25 | 25 |
|
Michael, any entity could come thru on the board and identify
itself as Satan. Just as someone could call you onthe phone
and say "Hello, this is Satan." Is that person on the other
end REALLY the person you identify as "the real Satan"? For
that matter, there could be more than one entity (or voice on
the phone) by the name as Satan. If you spoke with a person
named Adolph, would you assume it was Adolph Hitler of WWII
fame (infamy?)....
I personally do not believe thathere is a 'real' Satan.
We create our own evil and we create our own good, and one is
often the other, depending upon ones' perspective.
Suicide or free will? We each choose our time of entering an
earthly body and our time of departing. Suicide can be viewed
as positive or negative, and your view will make it just that,
but only for you.
We each experience what we need to experience.
Deb
|
476.114 | rather than re-invent the wheel ... | MARKER::KALLIS | Anger's no replacement for reason | Thu Sep 29 1988 16:36 | 13 |
| Re .113 (Deb):
>I personally do not believe thathere is a 'real' Satan.
A matter of belief. Others, including me, believe there is.
>We create our own evil and we create our own good, and one is
>often the other, depending upon ones' perspective.
Please read note 12 ("Rushing In") on my thoughts about moral
relativism.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
476.115 | | PBSVAX::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Thu Sep 29 1988 17:21 | 4 |
| Satan, by the way is not really a name -- it is a title. Roughly
speaking it means "The Opponent".
Topher
|
476.116 | Tonight and 2-days with Lazaris--happy birthday 2 me | WRO8A::WARDFR | Going HOME--as an Adventurer | Thu Sep 29 1988 17:55 | 6 |
| I agree with Deb...except to add that any entity aligning
itself with Satan can't be too terribly enlightened, in my
view.
Frederick
|
476.117 | my favorite holiday is commin up!!! | USACSB::OPERATOR_CB | DO WHAT THOU WILT | Fri Sep 30 1988 02:40 | 11 |
|
Re: .116
Hava-happy-B-Day
I dont think Good or Evil has anything to do with the level of
comprehension or intelligence one has. Matter of fact, if I knew
almost everything, I would be more likely to go Evil.
Goddess, delete my need to know!
Craig, ;-)
|
476.118 | | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Fri Sep 30 1988 07:29 | 9 |
|
Theres always the possibility that He is lying,and,that He is not
Satan.I went by his attitude(to me,he acts like Satan),of course,
that would be my own perception,and,by other entities confirmation.
Of course they all could be lying.
Peace
Michael
|
476.119 | A story | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Fri Sep 30 1988 12:46 | 15 |
| Craig,
Have you had any further contact on the board since your last report?
I once was asked by a friend to see if I could contact her mother,who,
recently died.I asked my contact and he did find her,and,gave me
a message from her.There were things said that I had no way of knowing
about,like pet names for children,concern for health problems I
knew nothing of,etc.My friend was several hundred miles away when
i received the message.She later confirmed all that was said was
correct.Pretty convincing to me.
Peace
Michael
|
476.120 | Is everyone out there? | POBOX::CROWE | I led the pigeons to the flag.. | Fri Sep 30 1988 14:28 | 8 |
| Mike,
Thanks for sharing with us your experiences with the ouija board.
I, for one, would love to hear more.
But a question, do you think it's possible to contact _anyone_ who
has died or are there limitations that exist either by a contact
or some "force" in their existence?
|
476.121 | | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Fri Sep 30 1988 14:44 | 17 |
|
I can only speak from my own experience and belief.There is so much
I dont know.My contact is reluctant to try to contact other souls,but,
sometimes he will do it as a favor to me.
At this point in time I believe there are many planes of existance.My
Ouija board connects with the lowest plane.My contact can,at times,go
one level higher,or,send messages to the higher level.I have received
several messages from my father this way,since he is on a higher
plane.Its not likely you will get much cooperation from entities
on the board.I have worked for a long time to develop a trust with
my contact.We may not be able to contact anyone we want,since some
of us may decide to reincarnate,and others not.
Peace
Michael
|
476.122 | question | DPDMAI::SWENSON | | Fri Sep 30 1988 18:37 | 2 |
| How many peoply are required to work with a Ouija board??
|
476.123 | | USACSB::OPERATOR_CB | DO WHAT THOU WILT | Sat Oct 01 1988 02:50 | 16 |
|
-<"You mean I was supposed to stand INSIDE the triangle ?!">-
Michael,
I have never worked with a "talking board" and I no longer deal
with these folks directly.
Time has passed and memories have warped but if I am remembered
by anything/anyone...say "Hi" to Wendy, and ask that she never have
her boss visit me again without warning!!! Oh...and tell DAVID that
"I dont know how I would have made it without him".
Was it a slip that you addressed this to me.....I sorta hope
so.
perhaps there is another Craig in this Conf???
(rationalizing) Craig ;-)
|
476.124 | varies | 37993::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Mon Oct 03 1988 12:13 | 7 |
| RE .122
That rather depends on the people. Most beginners need two or three
people to get it to work. With experience some people find that
they can do it alone. A few people can use it alone from the start.
Topher
|
476.125 | Burned The Board | GRECO::ANDERSON | Home of the Convoluted Brain | Sat Oct 08 1988 10:41 | 8 |
| Yes, there is another Craig in the conference, me. Mike, based
on the unfavorable character of the responses and the alignment
of the entity(s) coupled with some VERY strange and undesirable
events (coincidence) we burned our board to a fine ash which we
washed away. We decided that we're not going to dabble with something
that we don't understand.
The other Craig
|
476.126 | | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Mon Oct 10 1988 15:16 | 16 |
| ref .125
Hi Craig,
I was wondering what had happened to you.It can be a very scary
experience working the board.I guess,for you,and your friend,it
was a good decision to trash the board.I'm glad you destroyed it
instead of passing it on.It was an interesting experiment.I think
it got some people thinking and,perhaps,showed some evidence for
it being more than just a toy or our subconscience.
Thanks for trying it.Anybody else?(:^).
Peace
Michael
|
476.127 | Huh? | ERLTC::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Mon Oct 10 1988 15:53 | 32 |
| RE: .126 (Michael)
Michael, I must have missed something -- or was something said
"off line". I'm not going to bother arguing that what took place
was due to subconscious manifestations -- you have your opinions
and I have mine, and I don't see anything in what has been posted
here which argues strongly for my opinion.
However, I really don't see anything in what was posted that isn't
perfectly consistent with a subconscious explanation -- even without
psi which I do think comes into the picture sometimes. In other
words, what was posted seemed to me to be a complete wash as far
as evidence for one viewpoint over another.
The closest to evidence was the identification of the "red room"
as BAD. But in the context, this was an obvious guess: red is the
traditional color of rage, blood and of the flames of Hell. If
I were trying to fake things (and let me emphasize very strongly,
I am in no way suggesting that anyone is, I think that a very remote
possibility at most) its the response I would have made in that
context.
I am not attempting to challenge you, or anything. Really! I'm
just trying to understand what you saw which I missed or saw
differently.
(Let me add that I agree that this was a demonstration that the
Ouija is *not* a toy. Whether they come from within or without,
the Ouija can tamper with some very powerful, essentially
incomprehensible "forces".)
Topher
|
476.128 | Hi (:^) | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Tue Oct 11 1988 08:36 | 20 |
|
Topher,
I know you have a different approach to these things.I believe
it to be communicating with spirits,based on my experiences.I have
only entered a few of the more interesting ones here,but,there are
months of written text i have saved from my sessions.
I felt that my experiences have shown a slant against the
subconscience explanation,and,toward either PSI or SPIRIT.I chose
the spirit.I wasnt directing my comments specificly to you,but,the
theory.
I respect your opinions,even if i dont agree with them.I dont know
if we will ever know for sure,until our time comes to leave this
world,or,even then.It is interesting to compare experiences,and,thats
what I try to do.I am,however,trying to keep an open mind,and therefor
not totally convinced of my own theory.
Peace
Michael
|
476.129 | Just the facts...for now. | WHEEL::DONHAM | Waste is a terrible thing to mind | Tue Nov 01 1988 17:08 | 85 |
|
I had my first experience with a Ouija board last night, and
I'd like to share it with all of you. The session was
unfortunately short due to sleepiness, and my partner and I
received no startling revelations, but it was altogether an
enjoyable and enlightening time.
After about three minutes of silent meditation, the planchette
began to move, at first slowly and then more rapidly, in
sweeping circular motion around the perimeter of the board.
Me: What is your name?
Board: Random letters (no vowels) for a few minutes.
Me: Do you have a name?
Board: No.
Me: Do you have something to tell us?
Board: No.
Me: Is there someone there who would like to talk
with us?
Board: Yes.
Me: Go and get them.
At this, the planchette stopped moving for about 30 seconds.
Me: What is your name?
Board: Bev Ditz.
Me: Where are you?
Board: Random letters
Me: Do you know where you are?
Board: No.
Me: Would you like to tell us something?
Board: Dew never he else
Me: Dew never he else? Is that it?
Board: Yes.
Me: Else what?
Board: Random letters
Me: Bev, how old are you?
Board: 6.
Me: Is there someone else there who can speak to us?
Board: Yes.
Me: Get them now.
Again, the planchette stopped moving for about thirty seconds.
Me: What is your name?
Board: GDH
Me: GDH? Are those your initials?
Board: Yes.
Me: What would you like us to call you?
Board: He.
Me: How old are you?
Board: 47.
Me: Tell me something about Ariel (my friend).
Board: Remember get...I'm 66.
Here, Ariel was about to drop off into sleep.
Me: Can we speak with you another time?
Board: Yes.
Me: Goodnight, He.
Board: (Planchette zips to bottom of bboard and falls to
the floor)
As I said, nothing earth-shattering, but interesting to me. The
planchette moved differently with each change of character;
Bev's communication seemed slow, and the planchette spent a lot
of time searching for letters. He's method was more sure; the
planchette moved swiftly from letter to letter, pausing only
briefly each time.
Both Ariel and I remarked at how the planchette felt...we
rested our fingers very lightly on it, and I had trouble
"keeping up" with it as it zipped around under He's influence.
Ariel said the same thing. I kept my eyes closed to preclude
knowing what letter was where, although I did have a general
feel of how the alphabet was laid out on the board.
The next morning I realized that Bev had made reference to
He..."Dew never he else"...but I can't imagine what she meant.
I haven't decided what I believe about this phenomenon. As I
think about it some more, I'll enter my opinion.
Perry
|
476.130 | | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Wed Nov 02 1988 07:13 | 12 |
|
Hi Perry,
Thanks for your entry.I have communicated with at least a dozen
different entities,each one with its own way of operating the board.
Many of them are poor spellers.I can tell which entity is on the
board by their style.Let us know more,i find this subject quite
facinating.
Peace
Michael
|
476.131 | hello out there | BSS::BLAZEK | Dancing with My Self | Wed Nov 02 1988 14:16 | 8 |
| Perry,
Good luck in your Ouija board sessions. The entities you
contact can be comforting and friendly, and I wish you all
the luck in the world (this or any other!).
Carla
|
476.132 | The Experiment | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Fri Jan 13 1989 06:18 | 14 |
|
This subject has been quiet for a while.Anyone have any new stories
to tell about your sessions?
I was on my board last night.I remembered that someone had asked
if we ever tried to operate the board without looking,so,i tried
it.I had my son write down the letters while my wife and I closed
our eyes and looked away from the board.It didnt make any difference
at all.We still was able to communicate with our contact,no problem.
Hmmmm.
Peace
Michael
|
476.133 | roll up roll up | SUBURB::ABSOLOMT | | Thu Aug 09 1990 07:48 | 5 |
| Any U.K noters know where I can get hold of a board. I've lost mine,
(long story!), good ���� paid. I'm very experienced!?!
Tony Absolom @rdl
|