T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
380.1 | It takes one to know one... :-) | INK::KALLIS | Hallowe'en should be legal holiday | Fri Jun 12 1987 16:38 | 5 |
| By having equivalent powers oneself. If someone with such powers
_really_ didn't want the people without such powers to know they exist,
They'd be successful.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
380.2 | Is Empathy the Key?? | IKE::BUCUVALAS | | Fri Jun 12 1987 17:22 | 17 |
| Ahhh....I was hoping to catch your attention......if someone were
to have certain abilities them selves, would they be able to
"pick up" on ... say ..... certain vibrations in the "air" if the
person in question were applying their abilities at the time???
For example, I was told by a spiritualist (a person whom I and 5
others can verify the existence and effects of her particular gifts)
that my aura was a strong light green with turqouise highlights.
She said that this signified an unusually high level of healing
energy. If this were accurate and valid then I would assume that
a high degree of empathy, which I imagine, would be attendent along
with the primary talent, would be integral and active.
Could a high level of empathy (empathy=sensitivity??) pick up on
the use of other psi/paranormal abilities??
Samurai Writer
|
380.3 | checkpoints I look for.... | SSDEVO::ACKLEY | | Fri Jun 12 1987 18:24 | 20 |
| Yes, these people can be located. If you see auras, that is
one way, easier still just watch the person in action. The powerful
healthy psychic is detached, purposeful and "lucky". Try looking
at people with all the sensations of your body, not just your eyes.
Look for people who don't fear the "unknown", "unconscious",
etc.... Look for evidence of right brain/left brain integrated
thinking abilities. Look for someone who is relaxed (ie, not
carrying a lot of extra chronic tensions). Look for someone who
is running on their own inner guidance and not so dependent on
rules and rituals. Look for a person who is able to control
their emotions, yet also able to give in to them.
Many successful psychic people will deny they have abilities,
prefering to seem "normal". But questioning them you may find
they have highly developed visualization abilities, and they know
this ability is related to their success.
Good psychics are relativly common. Finding one who also
knows something about the occult is MUCH more difficult.
Alan.
|
380.4 | | SIVA::JESSOP | Brontosaurs had gastroliths... | Thu Jul 16 1987 18:56 | 20 |
|
re. -1
I don't know if this belongs with this note, or even in this
file, but in Taoism (philosophy, not religion), one tends to have
this "go with the flow (with one or two interjections at key points)
and everything will work out in due course" type of attitude, or
feeling. Sort of like, relying on luck. I'm not "heavy" into Taoism
, but I have done a "little" bit of study with it, and I do sort
"go with the flow" and tend not to let road blocks bother me, I
know they will move out of my way. And I have to say that it actually
works. I mean, everything I do seems to "work" right at the last
second. And if it doesn't work out just as I wanted, it tends not
to be too severe.
I don't know if any of that made sense, but I just thought I'd
get it out and see if there would be any comments...
Mike
|
380.5 | Hmmmm... | SIVA::JESSOP | Brontosaurs had gastroliths... | Thu Jul 16 1987 18:58 | 8 |
|
Now that I think about it, maybe I'm just plain LUCKY!
:^)
Mike
|
380.6 | Murphy was a Taoist | HPSCAD::DDOUCETTE | Care for life. | Fri Jul 17 1987 12:02 | 7 |
| I have always noticed that people get into situations that are "fitting
justice" to their personalities, both good and bad. Someone who
constantly rolls "00" to get out of a situation in a FRP game, or
someone who stumbles from one increadible relationship into another, or
leaves one job for good/bad reasons to find themselves in an even
better/worse job than before. You know they didn't do anything on his
own to get it. Is this Tao at work?
|
380.7 | | SIVA::JESSOP | Brontosaurs had gastroliths... | Mon Jul 20 1987 13:18 | 15 |
|
re.-1
I believe it has to do with not tipping the scales. The idea
is to not make waves, and therefor not leaning to one side or the
other (neither + nor - )... You realize that every action you
make DOES make some sort of a wave, so you try not to make waves
carelessly, and you sort of learn to use it to your advantage.
Does this make sense? Tao was just the philosopher that realized
this, and taught about it...
(as far as I'm concerned, that is)
Mike
|
380.8 | Finding The Tao. | PBSVAX::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Mon Jul 20 1987 18:07 | 40 |
| The word "Tao" is a Chinese word meaning roughly "way" or "path"
(martial arts buffs will recognize it as cognate with Japenese "Do"
as in juDO -- way of yielding, buDO -- way of the warior, aikiDO
-- way of strong spirit, karate-DO -- way of the chinese hand).
It is a central concept in all of chinese thought.
In Confusionism it represents "correct action", and basically
represented quite specific rules of conduct, not necessarily
particularly "natural" or "easy".
The strongest association is with Taoism, which is frequently classed
as a religion. Like many Eastern "religions", this labeling is
distinctly "fuzzy", and one can be both a Taoist and, for example,
a Moslem. Modern Taoism was essentially invented by Lao Tzu.
Although "going with the flow" is the central "message" in Taoism
its quite a bit more complex than that. (Or perhaps its so simple
it *seems* complex to those of us who have accreted a shell of
complexity). In particular, if it "seems" to you to have worked
out "right" at the last minute, then you were clearly *not* following
the Tao (as I understand it).
There is quite a bit of evidence that psi effects work best when
there is a state of relaxed, effortless will. This would seem to
be about half-way to the Tao (now just get rid of the will). Perhaps
this is a classic case of any effort for paranoramal effects preventing
progress (since if you learned to be truely effortless, you would
be part way to the goal (or lack of goal), but to produce effects
of being "lucky" you have to maintain the "will" part).
Oh yes -- pronounciation. You'll be much closer to the correct
pronounciation if you say "Dow", to rhyme with "Bough" as in Dow
Jones or Chemical. If you now mix in about 1/4 of how you might
think "Tao" should be pronounced, and let the pitch drop a bit from
the middle vowel (a or o) to the final vowel (o or w) then you'll
probably be as close as any English speaker without knowledge of
Chinese (such as myself) can hear.
Topher
|
380.9 | RE -1 | SIVA::JESSOP | Brontosaurs had gastroliths... | Tue Jul 21 1987 09:28 | 10 |
|
Oops!! Thanks for the correction on the name! Believe it or
not I DID know it, I just typed faster than I thought...
Well, I can see I still have a lot to learn about it. What
I saids before was just what I got out of it. Can you (Topher)
recommend any good books on Taoism?
Thanks,
Mike
|
380.10 | books for THE ROAD. | PBSVAX::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Tue Jul 21 1987 12:37 | 30 |
| RE: .9
It depends on what you want from the book. If you are interested
in a book about Taoism -- history, development of the ideas, whether
or not Lao Tzu actually existed, his deification by some sects,
his relation to the Tang Dynasty, etc, I have no particular book
to recommend. Go to the library and read the sections on Taoism
(generally relatively short) in the encyclopedia, in books of
comparative religion and on Chinese philosophy/religion. The I
Ching is considered by Taoists to be related to their beliefs (as
it also is by the almost polarly opposite Confusians; most
interpretations and translations emphasize the latter) so many of
the introductions of the I Ching talk some about it.
There is really only *one* book about Taoism, all others are really
commentaries on it. That is the Tao-te Ching generally attributed
to Lao Tzu (although non-Taoist scholars seem to believe it was
collectivly written, possibly from an oral tradition). The closest
translation to the name (i.e., the translation which makes the most
sense to me as someone completely ignorant of Chinese) is "The
Classical Book on the Way and its Power" (but watch out for the
last word -- it has completely inappropriate connotations in English).
I highly recommend this work. Find a translation which reads easy
to you and read it. Its quite short. You can read it again and
again and find some completely new -- even startling -- perspective
in it each time. Even if you disagree with its teachings entirely,
its worth reading.
Topher
|
380.11 | another book you might try... | SSDEVO::ACKLEY | No final answers here | Tue Jul 21 1987 13:58 | 6 |
| See "Tao, The Watercourse Way", by Alan Watts. It has
some interesting material on the difficulty in translating
the Tao Te Ching, and is very humorous.
It is also one of my all time favorite books.
Alan.
|
380.12 | Another book | SSDEVO::YOUNGER | I haven't lost my mind - it's Backed-up on tape somewhere | Wed Jul 22 1987 14:45 | 4 |
| See the _Tao of Pooh_, a humorous, but good book.
Elizabeth
|