T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
354.1 | Surmises from a couple of people's memories | SSDEVO::YOUNGER | I haven't lost my mind - it's Backed-up on tape somewhere | Thu Apr 30 1987 22:39 | 15 |
| I'm probably the someone you are thinking of. I don't know quite how
karma is served. I know of one other person who is part of a split
soul. We were discussing this one day, what we have been able to
remember and/or be regressed into remembering, and in both our cases,
it was caused by someone or a group of very powerful person(s)
deliberately trying to destroy us. In her case, she was powerful
enough to make several people afraid of her - they had to do something
take her down, although she was not abusing her power. In my case, I
tried to stop someone from doing harm, and he needed me out of his
way.
Hope this helps...
Elizabeth
|
354.2 | Where's my soulmate? | PANIC::CARTY | Teresa @London City | Fri May 01 1987 05:48 | 6 |
| Is splitting the same as twin souls or soulmates? My hazy understanding
of these is that we ALL have a twin soul, who may or may not incarnate
at the same time as us, we may meet them in this lifetime, we may
not ....Jane Roberts' twin soul was Seth
Teresa
|
354.3 | Just to add to the complexity | ERASER::KALLIS | Hallowe'en should be legal holiday | Fri May 01 1987 09:27 | 6 |
| In the Egyptian (Khemite) religion, each person had a soul and a
soul-double. The soul departed a body, which was visited periodically
by the soul-double after death.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
354.4 | Soulmates and splits | SSDEVO::YOUNGER | I haven't lost my mind - it's Backed-up on tape somewhere | Fri May 01 1987 11:10 | 8 |
| Not quite. Someone with whom you have split souls is either in
any given respect either the same as you, or the opposite. This
often does not make for a good relationship, as you would expect
from soulmates. A person can have quite a few soulmates, with whom
she has spent several or many lifetimes. These are kind of like
friends whose friendship lasts more than a lifetime.
Elizabeth
|
354.5 | ka-bal | WAGON::DONHAM | Spending the year dead for tax purposes | Thu May 07 1987 10:11 | 8 |
|
re .3
Steve, are you speaking of the _ka_ and the _ba_? I may have to
unbox a few reference books...
-Perry
|
354.6 | Will my answer mean you _will_ or _won't_ have to unpack the refs? | INK::KALLIS | Hallowe'en should be legal holiday | Thu May 07 1987 10:27 | 5 |
| Re .4:
Yes.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
354.7 | clarification is needed here!! | MILVAX::SOUZA | | Mon Apr 25 1988 11:11 | 4 |
|
What exactly IS a soulmate, and how would you know you had one??
-renee.
|
354.8 | read on... | GNUVAX::BOBBITT | showtime, Synergy... | Mon Apr 25 1988 15:58 | 7 |
| It doesn't go into a whole lot of detail about the soul-splitting
soul-rejoining concept, but I found the most comprehensive work
on soulmates to be "The Bridge Across Forever" by Richard Bach (the
same guy who wrote Jonathan Livingston Seagull and Illusions).
-Jody
|
354.9 | togetherness? | REGENT::NIKOLOFF | Meredith | Mon Apr 25 1988 17:03 | 20 |
|
Soul-splitting?
I was a twin at birth, but my little friend, didn't completely develope
and died before he/she was born. But,I feel I will link up with them at
some point in this life...Could this be possible?
Soulmates are terrrific.
A friend or lover that you feel connected with emotionally/spiritually.
someone with whom you feel their happiness is more important than your own.
By making them happy, you become happier. Its the closest thing to
unconditional love I've ever felt....Its also a warm feeling inside *just*
because you know they are there. How do you know when you meet one?
Well, you feel like you already know them and automatically like them.
Atleast this has been my experiences. I also read that you hang around
with the same group each carnation, thou they may change sexes and places?
|
354.10 | Soulmates & Twin-rays | SHRBIZ::WAINE | Linda | Tue Apr 26 1988 13:28 | 11 |
|
The definition of a soulmate that I've been told and that I agree
with is at the initial time of incarnation the soul became polarized
and split into to souls, one yin, one yang. You can only have 1
soul mate. He/She is your "other half".
There is also something called Twin-rays. Twin-rays are people
who have at least 4 of the 7 bodies of consciousness in alignment.
Linda
|
354.11 | So close, so far... | BSS::BLAZEK | Dancing with My Self | Tue Apr 26 1988 13:49 | 20 |
| re: .10 (Linda)
This is the first time I've heard mention of Twin-Rays. Any
other information you can provide would be much appreciated!
Am honestly surprised this topic hasn't taken off more than
this, but attribute it to the fact that (I feel) a Soulmate
and one's relationship with him/her is the ultimate in Things
Personal, a relationship extremely intense and even more so
private. Especially if only one of the two is aware of the
connection.
Wonder which is more difficult to deal with--knowing who your
Soulmate is and being able to see him/her regularly without
possessing present ability to incorporate him/her into your
day-to-day life, or having no idea who he/she is and living
in a state of blissful unawareness?
Carla
|
354.12 | Soulmates & Twinrays cont. | SHRBIZ::WAINE | Linda | Tue Apr 26 1988 14:04 | 25 |
|
To go into twin-rays further, I need to mention what the 7 bodies
or vehicles of consciousness are:
1) The Physical Body 5) The Monadic Body
2) The Emotional Body 6) The Vibrational Body
3) The Intellectual Body 7) The Astral Body
4) The Spiritual Body
To be a twin-ray the person would have to have at least 4 of the
7 bodies in alignment (or atunement) with yours.
You can have more than 1 twin-ray. You can have a twin-ray that
is not involved with you in a physical relationship (in which case the
physical body is not one of the bodies in alignment with yours,
4 other bodies are).
A soul-mate may have NO bodies in alignment with you. Hopefully
your soul-mate at least has the physical body in alignment if you
wish that type of relationship with your soul-mate. Twin-ray
relationships (romantically speaking) can actually be better (easier)
than a relationship with your soul-mate if your soul-mate is not
a twin-ray with you (i.e. less than 4 bodies in alignment).
Linda
|
354.13 | | DECWET::MITCHELL | Art imitates life imitates TV | Tue Apr 26 1988 16:45 | 5 |
| How do yin/yang soulmate advocates explain homosexuality?
John M.
|
354.14 | re: .13 | SHRBIZ::WAINE | Linda | Tue Apr 26 1988 18:18 | 21 |
| re: .13
Very Easily....
First of all, Yin/Yang refers to male/female characteristics, not
genitalia. Everyone has yin and yang characteristics. The trick
is to try and maintain a balance of the yin with the yang within
yourself.
In a relationship that is harmonious, there also has to be a yin/yang
balance. (I.E. If both people try to "wear the pants" - yang -
in a situation, there will be arguments, problems). It does not matter
what the external sex organs are in a harmonious relationship. In
order to have a harmonious relationship, for a given situation one
person should be the yin counterpart, the other the yang counterpart.
Soulmates can incarnate as the same sex. It all depends on their
karmic situation, what the individuals are to learn in this life,
and what the individuals are to learn within the relationship.
Linda
|
354.15 | | DECWET::MITCHELL | Art imitates life imitates TV | Tue Apr 26 1988 18:57 | 11 |
| RE: .14 (Linda)
> It all depends on their karmic situation, what the individuals are
to learn in this life, and what the individuals are to learn within the
relationship. <
To what end?
John M.
|
354.16 | Entities of different natures!!! | NEXUS::ENTLER | | Wed Apr 27 1988 11:11 | 42 |
| RE: .15
> It all depends on their karmic situation, what the individuals
are to learn in this life, and what the individuals are to learn within
the relationship. <
> To what end? <
If one believes in reincarnation and that as one reincarnates
each time in order to reach a higher understanding of one's self
or the whole, then one must have a reason to reach a higher under-
standing.
Such as it may be or have been that in one life an individual
lacked understanding or acceptance of other individuals because
of their beliefs, race, religion, cause, or in the case as mentioned
in .13, then it may be in the next life this entity may reincarnate
into exactly that form to which they could not cope in a previous
life.
In this manner they may gain a greater understanding of the
other existences that they themself had a problem with in the past.
Now they may find themselves living the same existence, experiencing
the same persecution by others such as that that they may have been
a part of in a past life. They may begin to see and understand
that the reasons why certain entities exist in certain plains can
be many. They may be by choice, by their upbringing, by influence,
by some unknown cause, by lack of understanding, or by desire.
Regardless of ther reasons behind one's pattern in life or
devotion to cause, to each his own, for one only has to find
satisfaction in our own cause, whatever it may be. The reach one's
higher self, once must reach an understanding that each other entity
that they come across in this existence at least deserves the right
to their own beliefs regardless of politics, race, sexual preference,
religion, etc.
If you choose not to agree with anothers beliefs then this
is fine. Again you have a right to your own beliefs, but you should
not persecute others for theirs or you may find yourself in their
shoes at another time and in another place!
****Learn in this life, or learn the hard way in the next******
|
354.17 | Learning is the key. | SCOPE::PAINTER | | Wed Apr 27 1988 13:11 | 14 |
|
Re.16 (Entler)
That was superb!
Reading recommendation - "Androgyny", by June Singer. She was a
student at the Jung school in Switzerland, and this book received
an excellent reviews from many people, including Joseph Campbell.
I'm only partway through and don't recall reincarnation being addressed
specifically, however it does present some new ideas in this area.
If anyone wants to see the table of contents, I'd be happy to bring
in the book and post that information here.
Cindy
|
354.18 | | SHRBIZ::WAINE | Linda | Wed Apr 27 1988 13:25 | 8 |
|
Re. 16 (Entler)
That was great! I couldn't have said it better myself!!!
Ditto...
Linda
|
354.19 | FINALLY AN EXPLAINATION!! | MILVAX::SOUZA | | Wed Apr 27 1988 14:32 | 22 |
| re: .9
_Wow_! Thank you, this explains mine and my SO's relationship to
a T. Also my best friend and I, who haven't seen each other in about
two years, but still are extremely close. (she lives on the west
coast and I in Ma!)
When I met my SO, I was a confirmed Man-hater. They all did me wrong
so the hell with them!! Then HE walked in and it was just like you
just explained!! All the other guys I had had "relationships" with
(and I use that term loosely!) were always a struggle, a feeling
of constant insecurity. Not this one, I think of him and get
unexplainable chills all over. I thought it was _just_ love, but
now that I've read on I know it's much more. I'll think something
without saying it and he'll say it!! I always wondered what the
term for that was!!
Thank you again!!
-renee.
p.s.
HAPPY SECRETARIES DAY!!! :^)
|
354.20 | | DECWET::MITCHELL | Art imitates life imitates TV | Wed Apr 27 1988 17:08 | 8 |
| RE: .16
Well written. But what is the supposed goal of all of this
"perfection?" And why do spirits not start off perfect from the
very beginning and save all the trouble?
John M.
|
354.21 | BEING ONE WITH THE UNIVERSE & ALL THAT IS! | NEXUS::ENTLER | | Wed Apr 27 1988 17:58 | 38 |
| RE: .20
> Well written. But what is the supposed goal of all of this
"perfection?" And why do spirits not start off perfect from the
very beginning and save all the trouble? <
Let me answer the second question first. Life is a learning
experience, thus as we learn of our imperfections and reconize them
then we become more perfect as you may put it, I would prefer to
say more knowledgeable and understanding of what goes on around
me.
As a young child, growing and learning about life as we grow
older, just how much would you learn if everything was given to
you on a "silver platter". No matter what you did wrong or even
right, no one was ever there to tell you. When you finally reach
the age of 18 or 21 or whatever is acceptable in your place in society
to move out and be on your own, do you think you would be ready
to cope with life, with your neigbors, with other entities? I very
much doubt it!
I don't know about you, but if everyone and everything was perfect
from the beginning, life would be very boring, there would be no
surprises. There would be no need to make an effort to move forward,
but rather we could become stagnate on one plane of existence.
Then "What is the supposed goal of all of this PERFECTION?"
To reach a greater understanding of your relationship to other
entities. Being accepting of the many different existences that
are possible. Acknowledging that material items carry no real value
personally unless perhaps you use them to help others less fortunate
than yourself. Eventually a greater understanding of yourself and
your growing need to expand your innermost thoughts. Moving forward,
progressing to higher levels of existence, becoming a greater part
of the whole!
The goal to reach a point of understanding that everything you
do and say has an effect on others around you and the overall purpose
to use your words or thoughts depending on your plane of existence
in a positive helpful manner!
(DO YOU REALLY WANT TO STAY WHERE YOU ARE TODAY FOREVER?)
|
354.22 | Smart aleck reply | SCOPE::PAINTER | | Wed Apr 27 1988 18:13 | 13 |
|
Well, being a vegetarian in California probably isn't all that bad
of a life. For some.
Pity though, that John is probably going to wake up one day just
like Woody Allen did in "Sleeper" and find out that sugar and
preservatives are on the path to true enlightenment (right up there
with the Orgasmatron - a replacement for those who write shopping
lists or lie there and think of England), and truly discover what
he was missing for all those years back in the 1980's.
Cindy
|
354.23 | sigh... | LAGUNA::THOMAS_TA | my violent heart, in the dark | Wed Apr 27 1988 18:21 | 7 |
| re: 11
Carla,
Not knowing...;->
TL
|
354.24 | Some are amazed, some are devoted, some are slaves | BSS::BLAZEK | Dancing with My Self | Wed Apr 27 1988 20:35 | 6 |
| re: .23 (Tade)
See you in mail over this one, my love...
Carla
|
354.25 | The position of "being one with the Universe" is already filled... | DECWET::MITCHELL | Art imitates life imitates TV | Wed Apr 27 1988 21:39 | 37 |
| RE: .21
> I don't know about you, but if everyone and everything was perfect
from the beginning, life would be very boring, there would be no
surprises. There would be no need to make an effort to move forward,
but rather we could become stagnate on one plane of existence. <
I disagree. All that is required is a system where perfection is
satisfying. If perfection were a natural part of life, you, as
a creature operating under its constraints, would find it the normal
way to be. Imagine a perfect being discussing OUR lives and remarking,
"Wouldn't it be a bitch to go through all that?"
Birds are born knowing how to fly south. They attain their goal
without having to study it. Flying south in the winter is of supreme
importance to a bird, so nature has chosen to give it the knowledge
it needs without having to waste precious time learning to fly south.
By the same token, if the supposed spiritual perfection were the
supreme goal of humankind, why wouldn't we just be BORN that way?
If it's really that important, it should just be there; like an
instinct.
Forgive me, but I still don't see the point in all this supposed
"learning." Once you reach perfection, you will be perfect forever,
right? So what's to stop you from getting bored then? Anyway,
infinity is infinity. It really doesn't matter if an entity who
has been perfect for 50 trillion years was born that way or not.
> (DO YOU REALLY WANT TO STAY WHERE YOU ARE TODAY FOREVER?) <
Regardless of my wishes, the Grim Reaper has the last word.
John M.
|
354.26 | Correction | DECWET::MITCHELL | Art imitates life imitates TV | Wed Apr 27 1988 21:51 | 7 |
| RE: .22
Er...Cindy, I'm a vegetarian in *Seattle* (although I come from
sunny CA).
John M.
|
354.27 | Perfection's only in the eye of the beholder! | NEXUS::ENTLER | | Thu Apr 28 1988 11:57 | 52 |
| RE: .25
> Forgive me, but I still don't see the point in all this supposed
"learning." Once you reach perfection, you will be perfect forever,
right? So what's to stop you from getting bored then? <
Well, John, first let me apoligize for not being clear. I was
rushed during that reply with calls and was not satisfied when it
when I logged off.
The whole purpose is to develop yourself spiritually with the
hope of reaching a greater understanding that you are only a part
of a greater entity or force in the universe. Each persons actions
affects others around them. Just as beating on a drum affects the
molecules in the air and are eventually passed across great distances
to someones ear as the sound of beating on a drum.
Even your replies to me and many others throughout this conference
has a great effect on others. I am coerced into responding to your
replies by your lack of understanding and repeated questions regarding
the subject at hand. Even though we may not agree with each other,
the end result is that we are affecting others that are taking the
time to read these notes, and in some cases responding. They may
add value to the subject matter, perhaps doing a better job of
clarifying the topic then either of us may be capable of!
>So what is the point of all of this learning? Once you reach
perfection, what's to stop you from getting bored!<
The point of all of this learning, is that you will gain more
knowledge and understanding of the things around you. Since we
all do not learn at the same speed and it may take us several
reincarnations to reach specific goals in our spiritual development
then those who have already reached those levels may become teachers
helping others to understand and grow spiritually.
Unless everyone were to reach perfection at the same time, then
the universe will never be perfect. Again I don't like that word
[PERFECT] for it is only perfect in the eye of the beholder. What
may appear perfect today, may be improved tomorrow thus being more
perfect, IMPROVED, the development may continue forever to new levels,
such as within yourself on the spiritual plane. Since others will
not reach perfection at the same time, then all is not perfect!
Then it may be up to you to help them achieve perfection on certain
planes. Others still on higher planes above you may help/teach
you the knowledge and understanding to reach upper levels.
Last you mention of the Grim Reeper having the last word! Not
unless you do not believe in life after death!!!!!!!!!!!
Dan
|
354.28 | free choice? | BPOV09::GROSSE | | Thu Apr 28 1988 12:54 | 7 |
| What happens to a soul who does not wish to learn? For if
all this is learning process that one MUST go through - where
does free choice enter into this. If a soul chooses not to
endure a teaching process then it seems to be punished for
this choice by being subjected to more and more difficult
lessons until in the end it submits.
|
354.29 | What a way to grow.live | GRECO::GADDIS | | Thu Apr 28 1988 12:57 | 19 |
|
re: .9
Thanks, this explains our relationship to a T.
When I met my Sue, I was going through a divorce and really was not
interested in trying to build another close relationship. Then WE met
and it was just like you explained!! It almost feels like we have always
been together and yet, at the same time, as if we just met. We now are
married with 2 intelligent (keep'um on their toes types) children (boy - 5
and girl - 2) but it still feels like we only met yesterday.
The best part is that I (we) am still learning from her (from each other).
Its great.
Thanks,
peace
|
354.31 | awareness/growth/operfection/etc. | ULTRA::LARU | peace, love, and the blues | Thu Apr 28 1988 13:44 | 44 |
|
re .27 NEXUS::ENTLER
� The whole purpose is to develop yourself spiritually with the
� hope of reaching a greater understanding that you are only a part
� of a greater entity or force in the universe.
It seems to me that the goal is to *be aware of* how one fits in to the
universe, whatever that relationship may be. I think that predefining
the awareness to be gained as [any concept] prejudices the outcome.
� ...... I am coerced into responding to your
I don't think one is coerced to do anything. If one responds, one does
so by choice.
re .28 BPOV09::GROSSE
� What happens to a soul who does not wish to learn? For if
� all this is learning process that one MUST go through - where
� does free choice enter into this. If a soul chooses not to
� endure a teaching process then it seems to be punished for
� this choice by being subjected to more and more difficult
� lessons until in the end it submits.
I think it is the choice of each individual. At some level, one is
always learning (something...).
If the choices that an individual makes points one in a direction
away from spiritual development, at some point the individual will
get to make the same choice again (and again....).
My preferred definition of "perfection" is the process of being as
aware as one is capable of being at any particular instant. I think that
it is that awareness that leads to growth (greater awareness).
bruce
|
354.32 | You said it! | NEXUS::ENTLER | | Thu Apr 28 1988 14:00 | 42 |
|
RE: .28 Sorry about .30, terminal locked and ^c out, aborted
message.
RE: .28
I think you did quite well in answering your own question!
> If a soul chooses not to endure a teaching process then it
seems to be punished for this choice by being subjected to more
and more difficult lessons until in the end it submits. <
Isn't this true throughout life? As a child when you did something
wrong, your mother or father often repeated the word "NO". At first
it didn't make since to you, or perhaps have any affect. Perhaps
accompanied by a little slap on the rump or being picked up and
put back in your playpin something eventually clicked and you began
to realize that when you heard "NO", it meant to stop whatever you
were doing. You also got rewarded, they didn't slap you on the
rump on put you back in the playpin!
In life, things are not always so simple. There are many habitual
criminals that either have never learnt or choose not to learn the
acceptable paths that are open to them. They will no doubt die
without ever learning anything of value from there experience.
"So what happens to them?" These criminals may end up coming
back in another life and become the victims of the vary type of
crimes that they committed in their prior life! Now they may pass
on again, but having experience both sides of the issue. Perhaps
they may have learned what needed to be learned as the victim. Perhaps
not. It may be necessary again to return as a criminal and see
if they reform after being identified as such. If not then the
process may be repeated, with variations, over and over again until
this entity submits and becomes enlightened by experience!
I know that some of you might say, "GEEE, this could take forever!"
For some it may, but what is time but something that we in the physical
sense have made up to set our routines to. On the Spiritual plane
time, as we know it, may not exist.
Dan
|
354.33 | Re: .28 | SHRBIZ::WAINE | Linda | Thu Apr 28 1988 14:36 | 20 |
|
Re: .28
It is my understanding that a soul, prior to an incarnation, chooses
or agrees to many factors of the up-coming life, factors such as parents,
children, relationships, which karmic lessons to learn from in that life,
etc. So even if the soul refuses to learn all the karmic lessons of that
life or creates more karma (which all of us have done or we wouldn't
still be here...), it's still in the life-death-cycle and will have to work
it out in the next life(s). Since the soul created the karma in
its life, it is up to that soul to work off their karma. No one is
punishing the soul, other than that soul. It was the soul's free-will
choice to create the karma, and it is the soul's free-will choice
when and how it can be worked off. That soul is totally responsible
for its lives.
Once all the karma has been worked out, then the soul will ascend
to the next plane of existence, a plane of higher consciousness.
Linda
|
354.34 | And for a slightly different view | CSC32::KACHELMYER | Dave Kachelmyer, CSC/CS VMS-SPACE | Thu Apr 28 1988 22:01 | 56 |
| My understanding is quite close to Linda's in .28. However, I've
got a slightly different view of Karma; perhaps just one of the
many different ways of looking at something.
My understanding is that the soul decides, with the help of guides
and advisors, on the lessons it wants to learn in an incarnation.
Then, again wth help, a particular life is chosen that is likely
to afford the opportunities to facilitate those lessons. My
understanding is that that life plan is called Karma. It's not
earned or assigned, but chosen by the spirit.
Then once incarnated in human form, and with much of it's spiritual
awareness tucked back and away in the unconscious, the spirit/human
then proceeds along with it's life and it's lessons.
It is (certainly) possible that the Karma or life plan won't be
followed exactly, or that something is done that, upon later review,
could use further study to understand fully.
After the physical body is shed, the spirit, along with advisors,
reviews the events of the past incarnation. The things that were done,
not done, etc are analyzed and a new Karma/life plan developed.
My understanding that once a lesson is finally learned, that the spirit
may not necessarily have to spend extra incarnations trying to balance
the ledger (so to speak). After all, the idea is to learn, not to work
off demerits, and expending incarnations in this manner would only serve
to hinder progress.
The discussion on soul-splitting brings to mind a description I read of
the relationship between God/{name-of-your-choice},higher selves
and ourselves.
In a nutshell, it was something like a large glowing sphere connected
by gold cords to a multitude of smaller glowing spheres. These
smaller spheres were, in turn, connected by silver cords to a number
of still smaller glowing spheres.
The largest sphere was the source (God/{name-of-your-choice}). The
next smaller spheres were spirit entities that correspond with our
higher self. And, the next smaller spheres were the individual
entities that were the various experiences that the higher self
was engaged in (like an incarnate human or whatever). Once the
individual entity was developed, I believe that it, along with all
it's experiences, were merged back with the higher self. In turn,
the same thing ultimately happens between the higher self and God.
I believe that this description came from 'the Laz book' (Lazarus'
'The sacred Journey', to the more formal ;-) )
As a side comment, the ol' ego initially wasn't too pleased to learn
that it was effectively a spawned subprocess! :-) :-)
Kak
|
354.35 | | BPOV09::GROSSE | | Fri Apr 29 1988 10:09 | 19 |
| re. .31 .32 .33 .34
I am still confused on the matter of "free choice" as it seems
that if Karma dictates what needs to be learned then the soul
has no choice but to choose situations that will teach this
or that. I, personally, find it unsettling to think that there
is no choice allowed in this matter. i.e. why can't a soul
learn in between incarnations what it should have learned
as a result from its former life and decided right then and
there not to repeat the same errors and in doing so choose
not to endure any further lessons in a next life as the
soul in question "has learned" from the most recent life?
I hope this question is less confusing than I am regarding
this as it really concerns me to think that there is no
free will to say enough is enough.
cb
|
354.36 | Right! | NEXUS::ENTLER | | Fri Apr 29 1988 10:57 | 6 |
| RE: .34
I couldn't have said it better myself!
Dan
|
354.37 | Karma- ya can't live with it..... | REGENT::WAGNER | | Fri Apr 29 1988 11:37 | 33 |
| re: .35
Very good question. I will try to complete the answer with
what I understand. Karma Impells it does not compel. It does not
dictate-it guides. .34 was very well put. probably not all lessons
have to be learned on the physical plane but there are a few lessons
tied to physical gratification that seems quite necessary to confront
on the physical plane of existance. I used to have the same question
about Karma: if we never took that first step into physical life
then we would never have to worry about negative or positive karma
and learning lessons-until I realized that just by becoming soul
entitiees separate from the God-force we are subjected to the influence
of Karma. I want to take this idea one-step furthur and say that
we as souls separate from the god-force and eventually take on physical
life so that we may gain in total self awareness which in turn
increases total self-awareness of the God-force enabling "God" to
grow in awareness. I think that words attributed to "God" such
as "omnipotent" ect are only labels provided by humans because of
our limited understanding. I want to remove the label and allow
God to grow even beyond our vaguest understandings of what WE think
the word omnipotent means.
Gettinhg back to choice. Not choosing to take on Karma is
a choice. And in its own way the act of "not choosing" prevents
one from actively choosing to become aware and return to the
God-force, which becomes a hell in its self. When a soul takes
on physical life, it can only determine if it actually learned the
lesson by participation. One can intellectualize whether a lesson
is learned but to actually experience the situation is "proof of
the pudding".
did I muddy it up any more or perchance lessen your confusion
to any degree (I hope).
|
354.38 | it's my karma and i'll cry if i want to | ULTRA::LARU | peace, love, and the blues | Fri Apr 29 1988 12:08 | 23 |
| I hate to wait in line. Any line. For any reason. No matter what
line I choose, that's the one with the slowest checkout person.
That's the register that needs new paper. That's the one where
everybody is either writing a check or is overdrawn on their
credit card of has merchandise that is not priced.
Perhaps one of my life lessons is to learn about my
relative unimportance, about the meaningless of our
concepts of time, or just to be prepared and always
carry something to read [I already know everything about
Elvis' love tryst with the space aliens that wish to know
(maybe my karma is to learn not to scoff at space aliens)].
I think it's difficult to truly know what one's karma is; it
seems to me that the best one can do is to deal with *all*
aspects of life as best as one can, to try to understand
as much as possible from as many different perspectives as
possible, and to not worry about whether it's "karma."
I have it on good authority that god/goddess/all-that-there-is
gives extra credit, and that neatness counts. attendence is
mandatory.
bruce
|
354.39 | impelled to compel? | GENRAL::DANIEL | If it's sloppy, eat over the sink. | Fri Apr 29 1988 12:38 | 32 |
| re; < Note 354.35 by BPOV09::GROSSE >
> I am still confused on the matter of "free choice" as it seems
> that if Karma dictates what needs to be learned then the soul
> has no choice but to choose situations that will teach this
> or that. I, personally, find it unsettling to think that there
> is no choice allowed in this matter.
From my personal experience, I have come to the following conclusion (and of
course, conclusions are subject to change when more experience is added);
A later reply said "Karma impels, it does not compel". What I think, includes
that.
From reading tarot cards, I realized that what I was saying to people was based
upon where they were at that particular moment; their fates were headed in a
certain direction, but only *at that moment*. Anything and everything that the
person did from the time of the reading, on, effected the direction (of the
fate) in which they were moving. This leads me to think that, at any time, we
can change our mind about the lessons we choose to learn here. Once again,
like with the magic mirrors, a change in decision about life's lessons is one
which sounds pretty easy, but involves layers and layers, like an onion. You
have a general direction set in which you are moving; everything you have done,
have been, have known, has led you to choose your direction for the "future",
but you can change the plan, which means re-perceiving (!wow, a new word!) all
of your beliefs about yourself and your life (or, at least the ones that are
pertinent to whatever change you want to make).
It all impels. It is *we* who chose to perceive it as compelling. (Did I do
ok on that one?) ;-)
Meredith
|
354.40 | re.38 question | BPOV09::GROSSE | | Fri Apr 29 1988 12:55 | 19 |
| re.38
first I want to say that sometimes when writing things they are
micnstrued as snide, so to prevent that from happening I want
to clarify that what I want to ask is a sincere question seen
from my point of view.
You mentioned that standing in the check out line waiting so
long etc etc. may be happening to teach you that you are
one of many of the masses so to speak...
So here's my question, I am forever ending up inthe slowest
line but looking at how difficult it is for stores to find
help this is almost inevitable that there are more new
people behind the registers and therefore slower than there
are experienced help. Wouldn't it be possible that ending
up in the line with such people is merely good odds that
anyoe will rather than believing that the experience is
karmic?
cb
|
354.41 | learn what you want... don't blame it on karma | ULTRA::LARU | peace, love, and the blues | Fri Apr 29 1988 13:05 | 18 |
| re .40
I tried to say that it may or may not be karma... if we all wait
in line, maybe we all have that aspect in our karma... maybe there
are many lessons to be learned from the same situation...
in any event, i would rather not be annoyed... so my choice, as
i see it is to learn to accept it, or learn to deal with it
another way... learn to live without lines, learn to meet new
friends, solve differential equations, etc... it almost
doesn't matter how i deal with it... i don't see any point
in making myself miserable just cause i'm waiting in line (or
for any other reason, either)... there are lots of "productive"
things to do in life... and one can define "productive" any
way they like...
bruce
|
354.42 | | BPOV09::GROSSE | | Fri Apr 29 1988 13:20 | 13 |
| re.39
Merideth,
I found the same thing regarding Tarot reading, it seemed that what
was being said at that point of time could very well be true like
"if all things contiunue in this manner" however in the event
of the reading someone could make a decision that they would like
to change the direction they were "at that moment" heading.
you explained it all very well and I am less confused "at this
point in time" ;_)
cb
|
354.43 | Is the Me or is that Me?! | BSS::BLAZEK | Dancing with My Self | Fri Apr 29 1988 18:54 | 6 |
| Well then, what would cause a soul to split? Would the
two halves incarnate at the same times? How long would
they be separate, and just how separate are they?
Carla
|
354.44 | Sounds better than it is. | WRO8A::GUEST_TMP | HOME, in spite of my ego! | Fri Apr 29 1988 21:33 | 58 |
| re: .37 (Wagner)
I like your explanations on this one.
Karma exists only if you want it to. You have the choice to
either keep it or release it. You are not somehow "stuck" with
it.
Nothing "causes" a soul to split. If all time is simultaneous
(except for our illusion of the physical plane) then all our lifetimes
are, too. It has been said (by guess who?) that we could have
overlapping lifetimes but that it would be *unlikely* that any of
us would have that happening for very long (that is, maybe a year
or two, e.g.) You are not, therefore, likely to mate with the
"other half" of yourself. Each of us is a whole unto ourselves.
That you choose to consider someone a "soul-mate" is real nice,
but it is a CHOICE. Does this mean you have a past-life connection?
Maybe yes, but not necessarily. It is a choice, only. *YOU* decide
that the connection is strong (by whatever criteria) and again
decide that this person(s) (or animal) is one you wish to be with "forever."
I don't know if I read this in DEJAVU or it came from elsewhere
but it is an interesting thought: A man and a woman decide to be
"soul-mates". The woman dies within a few years. The man, after
perhaps several years, meets someone whom he loves deeply and after
a period of time, decides he wants to be "soul-mated" to her. This
can be compounded, but leaving it simple...what happens when they've
all died? Is the man "soul-mated" to the first or second woman?
Is the second woman "soul-mated" to the first? From this one can
see how ludicrous the concept of soul-mates *CAN* become. It should
be clear that the soul-mating occurs moment-by-moment, only. That
it is there only because of a decision and by a choice. It also
implies cooperation and a mutual decision, which can be kept or
broken at "free" will.
I think the term "soul" is being misused here. If one sees
the soul as a lens to God/Goddess/All-That-Is, it is not likely
to see it as "splitting." If, on the other hand, one speaks of
the Higher Self and sees within that all lifetimes and all events,
then it is much easier to see a connection between aspects of
"self" to "others." It is not a splitting, at least not anymore
than multiple lifetimes could be similarly considered. I do not
feel I am a split of anything...but I do feel that I am an aspect
of something much "greater" than I am. I have met many people in
my life (mostly women) with whom I have felt a great and wonderful
bonding. It is clear from the life that has ensued, that we are
not "soul-mates" for we've moved on (for the most part.) At the
present I have a special person in my life who *could be* a soul-
mate...and then, again, maybe not. If one reads all the books about
soul-mates, one will very often find that the mates the author had
has since moved on to another, or vice versa. Seems to me that
that puts a chink in the armour of this whole concept of "soul-mates."
My suggestion is that not too much weight be put on the idea. That
it, like karma and destiny, is a choice. And like everything else,
it is subject to change at THOUGHT.
Frederick
|
354.45 | Not all souls split. | SHRBIZ::WAINE | Linda | Mon May 02 1988 17:16 | 15 |
|
Re: .43
It is my understanding that the splitting of a soul occurred(s) during
the FIRST incarnation of that soul. It occurred when it first
undertook a physical form. The splitting is due to a polarization
of the soul that occurred just prior to incarnation. (I don't know
if it is the initial force of taking on a physical body, or what.)
Not all souls split. There are people who have no soul-mates because
of this. When both soul-mates have broken the life-death cycle
and ascended, it is up to them whether or not they want to merge back
into one soul again. It is not a necessity to merge back to one
soul.
Linda
|
354.46 | Re: .44 | SHRBIZ::WAINE | Linda | Mon May 02 1988 17:41 | 42 |
| Re: .44
It is my understanding that you do NOT CHOOSE your soul-mate.
As I've mentioned in previous notes, you only have 1 soul-mate,
but you can have many twin-rays. A lot of people make an
assumption that just because a relationship is very good and
very strong that it is a soul-mate relationship. This is not
true. Soul-mate relationships can be the most difficult
relationship possible for the individuals. Soul-mates can HATE
each other in a life-time. I think that a lot of people do
not fully understand the concept of a soul-mate and that a lot
of times the relationships are with twin-rays, and not soul-mates.
Sometimes for a given life-time, the best relationship for a
person is with a twin-ray and not his/her soul-mate. It all
depends on the karmic lessons that the person needs to learn in
that life-time.
I agree with you that each of us is a whole unto ourselves.
That is one of the karmic lessons that we must learn due to the
splitting. Because the balance was not maintained and a split
was caused, the two resulting souls must maintain the balance
within themselves, and eventually a balance between themselves.
As for the story you told.... The man cannot choose to be
soul-mated, but he can choose to be married for eternity.
These two concepts are vastly different.
I want to stress that you can only have 1 soul-mate, but many
twin-rays. And I want to stress that just because soul-mates
have a relationship in a life-time does NOT mean that life
will be all rosy & wonderful. Soul-mate relationships can
be the most difficult relationships of all the types of
relationships; and just because soul-mates have a relationship
does NOT mean that they will spend the rest of their lives
(this life or the next lives or the prior lives) in perfect
bliss.... Soul-mates can break up their relationships.
If you can master a relationship, regardless of it being a
soul-mate or a twin-ray relationship, you can break the
life-death cycle.
Linda
|
354.47 | Question | CLUE::PAINTER | | Tue May 03 1988 18:23 | 6 |
|
Linda,
How would one "master a relationship"?
Cindy
|
354.48 | heavy metal | ULTRA::LARU | peace, love, and the blues | Wed May 04 1988 10:29 | 6 |
| re .47
� How would one "master a relationship"?
whips and chains??
|
354.49 | mastery | GENRAL::DANIEL | We are the otters of the Universe | Wed May 04 1988 12:14 | 21 |
| re .47
� How would one "master a relationship"?
cute on the control devices, bruce!
personal opinion;
there are moments when mastery of a relationship exists
those moments when you are you and you are letting the other person be, too
and love is flowing between you
and the walls have dropped
and the projections have faded away
and for that moment, you feel good about who you are
and good about who is that special other person
it is at that time that you (both) have mastery of the relationship
treasure the moment
for in the real world
it will surely slip away
and appear again, as does a wave.
|
354.50 | Mastering a Relationship | SHRBIZ::WAINE | Linda | Wed May 04 1988 12:31 | 16 |
| Re: .47
It is my understanding that in order to "master" a relationship one
thing that must happen is that a person must maintain the balance
& harmony within the relationship while maintaining the balance &
harmony within him/herself.
It's really a very simple idea when you think about, but, boy, can
it be difficult to do!! The difficulty, I believe, stems from the
fact that the person you have a relationship with "pushes" certain
"buttons" in you, some good, and some bad. If a "bad" or negative
"button" is pushed, the emotional body gets out of balance, unless
the person, whose button is being "pushed", can learn to "ACT, NOT
REACT".
Linda
|
354.51 | One or all? | SCOPE::PAINTER | | Wed May 04 1988 14:41 | 11 |
|
Is it just for marriage-type relationships or is it for friendships,
etc. also?
I'm hoping that after the divorce happens that we can work on a
deep and long-lasting friendship and that is our goal.
Everything happens for a reason.....just have to keep reminding
myself of that.
Cindy
|
354.52 | Re: .51 | SHRBIZ::WAINE | Linda | Wed May 04 1988 16:12 | 20 |
| Re: .51
Cindy,
I would assume that it would be for marriage-type relationships,
i.e. the "ultimate" commitment. In friendships, you usually don't
have to deal with the person day in & day out; and the commitment
is not the same. If you want to break up a friendship, it is a
lot different than breaking up a marriage-type relationship.
I stress, though, that this is only ONE way of mastering.....
I think it's really good that you are trying to maintain a friendship
with him. This will enable you & him to keep on working out the
karma between you two.
Remember, everything does finally work out for the highest & the
best....
Linda
|
354.53 | Free choice | SSDEVO::YOUNGER | Everyone is entitled to my opinon | Fri May 20 1988 17:28 | 13 |
| RE .35
There is a choice. If one has Karma (good or bad), it needs to
be worked off. You have the choice of correcting the situation
(it may be painful), or to run away from it (it will tend to catch
up).
You're going to move, one way or another. If you choose not to
work on improving yourself, you will regress into something less
than you are now.
Elizabeth
|