T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
262.2 | heard this before | SPIDER::PARE | | Wed Dec 10 1986 16:12 | 3 |
| I have a friend who works here at DEC who had a similar experience
with the Church of Scientology. I wouldn't touch them with a ten
foot pole.
|
262.3 | | INK::KALLIS | Support Hallowe'en | Wed Dec 10 1986 16:35 | 10 |
| I once heard from a relative that the Scientologist "Church" bought
a hotel in Florida for several million in cash[!].
Whether true or hearsay, it points up one thing: it's good, when
looking for enlightenment to chyeck out the organization's financial
aspirations. Those who require hefty fees should generally be viewed
with some suspicion as opposed to others that don't.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
262.4 | They want it ALL | FLOWER::JASNIEWSKI | | Thu Dec 11 1986 07:58 | 10 |
|
I too once, while in a depressed state, picked up a copy of
the L Ron Hubbard book "Dianetics". A couple of friends spied it
sitting on my coffe table and remarked "Be careful; the people
behind that WANT IT ALL". One said "read it if you like but be
aware of that aspect". Somehow, I felt much better throwing it in
the trash -
Joe Jas
|
262.5 | Other Hubbard writings | LEZAH::LIBRARIAN | Learning is Returning | Thu Dec 11 1986 09:14 | 11 |
|
Another thing to think about is that L. Ron Hubbard has
written quite a lot of science fiction. Nothing wrong with
that (I like science fiction) but the Dianetics stuff is
the only supposidly non-fiction that I am aware of him
writing. Makes me wonder what the foundations of his
theories are.
Lance
|
262.6 | Cavaet Emptor | INK::KALLIS | Support Hallowe'en | Thu Dec 11 1986 09:41 | 11 |
| Re .5:
L Ron Hubbard _started_ as a science-fiction/fantasy writer. Some
of his better stuff includes _Final Blackout_, "Fear," and "Triton."
There are periodically surfacing stories that his Dianetics (which
was introduced in the pages of _Astounding Science Fiction_ [as
_Analog_ was called in those days) was a conditional success, leading
him both to develop Scientology and the "Church" to go with it.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
262.8 | Is that why... | NEXUS::MORGAN | Walk in Balance... | Sat Dec 13 1986 23:37 | 7 |
| So is that why L. Ron had a rush of books out in the last two years?
Seems to me there would be nothing to do but write books while living
in exile on a ship at sea.
Who did all the bucks go to after he died?
Mikie?
|
262.9 | shoot the shiesters | NEXUS::MCCLOSKEY | Gort,Klatuu Brata Nickto | Mon Dec 15 1986 16:59 | 21 |
| Hi all,
I read Dianetics a couple of years ago when I was in same frame
of mind as 262.5 I found it was dull boring and just a bunch of
rambling thoughts that did'nt make sense sounds like "the church"
works the same way E.S.T does another mind bending scam contrived
to help the origenator of said "help" fill his pockets with the
bendee's hard earned cash in his pocket.traditional "help" works
if the person "helping" is not looking out to fill said pockets
also I went using HMO so there was no incentive to drag out "treatment"
for 4-5 years.Rev. Moon,Mr. Hubbard,Eairhart are just a bunch of
shiesters looking to fill there coffers anyway possable.
I still look at it like this,as soon as someone sez-
"Tell you what I'm gonna do for you"WATCH OUT!!!
(folding up and storing soapbox)
have a merry Xmas,happy new year to all
Kevin
|
262.10 | Pointer | INK::KALLIS | Support Hallowe'en | Mon Dec 15 1986 17:09 | 7 |
| Re .9, earlier:
The latest issue of _Fate_ has an excellent lead article, "Beware
of Bogus Gurus," which is excellent reading in this matter.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
262.11 | A very expensive hobby | SALES::MAYER | | Mon Dec 15 1986 18:15 | 19 |
| several years ago the Reader's Digest did a terrifying expose
of what happens to "potential trouble makers" the family and
friends of Scientologists who don't think its the greatest thing
going. It was a terrifying story...I won't go into details.
A member of my family just left Scientology after 15 years--
he was an early member--be ware--they treat computer scientists
very well--but still this relative was sucked dry of some 6-digit
amount of money over the years. He finally left in disgust over
the restrictions on personal life. And he never got 'clear' after
all that! Its definitely a cult--and they use celebrities (Karen
Black, john travolta?, Priscilla Presley and her daughter Lisa,
to show the world that they are cool...but from one affected by
it as a family member--it was a heartbreaking experience--very much
a cult and a money-making operation that uses techniques that are
similar to blackmail or extortion to keep members involved and
contributing).
My family is glad--after 15 years--to be free of the L.Ron.-shadow!
|
262.13 | The things one sees on Boylston St... | VAXWRK::NORDLINGER | To reach the unreachable STAR | Sun Dec 21 1986 21:35 | 23 |
| > Not to be a wet blanket, but some people must consider Scientology
> their religion (as opposed to their "cult"), so be a little bit
> careful about how you phrase your criticisms.
So what. It is a cult. People involved have been taken. How do
you say that politely?
> It sounds like a money-making scam to me too, but any non-believer could
> say that about any organized religion
You're right, and they'd be right.
The Church of Scientology has some sacred writings, available only after
years of study, which are said to reveal the mysteries including creation.
Fortunately the Boston Globe saved us countless thousands and printed
these writings (The Church said if anyone not ready read these they would
become warped). Obviously I read them and they sound remarkably similar
to L. Ron's own stuff. I'm not implying that he fabricated religious
documents, rather he took sacred writings known only to him and used them
as the foundations to his literary efforts. He plagiarizes from GOD.
John ;^)
|
262.14 | FYI | WATNEY::SPARROW | You want me to do what?? | Mon Dec 22 1986 12:50 | 6 |
| In doing a search for my kidnapped son, I came across a number
for help with emancipation from cults---703-268-5827.
I talked to them, they are concerned, helpful kind people.
vivian
|
262.15 | | MASTER::EPETERSON | | Wed Jan 28 1987 18:31 | 16 |
| I had a very short experience with the group. I had a friend who
was involved. He encouraged me to come in for a sort of "evaluation".
During this procedure you take some tests, speak to several people
(etc) all in turn. After two of the tests and speaking with one
guy who seemed anoyed that I asked him some questions (and they
were only in honest curiosity) I decided to leave before the next
set of tests. I took my coat and left. One of the members (who
I found out later was supposed to be watching me!) came running
out on to the street and gave me a very hadr time about leaving.
That only turned me off more, so I went home. Later I got calls
from many and various other people begging, pleading, and finally
ordering me to come back. Even the guy that was supposed to stop
me from leaving called me and told me that he would be in big trouble
if I didn't come back. I don't know if that was true, but I think
it could have been. Needless to say I never went back. From what
I have read and seen since, I guess I was lucky.
|
262.16 | one voice in defense.... | WORM::ACKLEY | alan the plasmoid | Thu Jun 11 1987 14:18 | 63 |
| The dianetics movement started in 1950 with the publication
of "dianetics" and an article in Street + Smiths Astounding Science
fiction magazine. It was a farily healthy movement, until the
US government and the AMA opposed it and started to prosecute people
for practicing medicine without a liscence. Then L. Ron left
the country and bought his yacht, and the church was formed. At
this time the fees were started.
The fees charged are similar to those charged by any psychiatrist,
and as with psychiatrists, there are good ones and bad ones.
My parents were running a "dianetics" group in our house in
the early 1950's, and were founding members of the church, but dropped
out later as the movement degenerated. None of us were ever
hassled for leaving, although I know others have been.
L Ron Hubbard wrote the book "Dianetics", but used a lot of
material generated by others, without giving credit. When the
church was formed, researchers that disagreed with Hubbard were
left out of the group, and he took credit for all the advances.
Many splinter groups have formed, and some forms of therapy are
based on technique similar to Dianetics ( for instance "Primal
Scream" therapy, from Arthur Janov)
When the AMA came down heavy, Hubbard militarized his
organization (he was an Annapolis graduate, someone told me,
the roommate of Robert Heinlein.) and I don't really blame him,
since the war waged against him was somewhat unfair. I think
he visualized the church as an army of healers, trained to save
the world from repressed trauma. IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN HOW
MUCH GOOD OR EVIL WILL COME OF THIS MOVEMENT. The judgement
is not all in yet !
The scientologists have done some good in opposing the abuse
of electro-shock therapy, and have also harrased and hurt people.
It is clear that the therapy method IS NOT FOR EVERYBODY !
It does a lot of people good, but some people are harmed, and have
ended up in institutions.
I am not a member of the church, although I took a few classes
to find out more about my own family history. Scientology is
not entirely a negative, *evil*, group of people. There are many
good scientologists, and many people have been healed or helped
by them. It is also a money grubbing business organization.
The church has degenerated over time but still contains a lot of
good potential.
Finally: EVERYTHING they teach for maximum $$$ is available
free in your public library. Dianetics started as a science, where
theories could be challenged and changed. Hubbard was FORCED to
start the church, but now theories have become dogma, for many of
the members.
Hubbard apparently became disgusted with the organization a
few years ago, and went back to writing sci-fi. Some people tried
to wrest control of the church from him in court (including his
family members). His recent fiction mentions NOTHING about
dianetics or scientology. I hear he died recently.
I do not ever intend to get involved with these people again,
but would not count out all possibilities. Scientology still
fascinates me, and I do not think the movement can be properly
characterized as either all good or all evil. I really do expect
some good to still come of it. Lets not throw out the baby with
the bath water.
Alan.
|
262.17 | | GRECO::MISTOVICH | | Wed Jun 17 1987 13:48 | 3
|