T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
192.2 | Menstrual Lunar Cycles | VAXUUM::DYER | Define `Quality' | Sat Aug 16 1986 15:00 | 9 |
| Topic #32 has touched on this a bit . . .
It seems that women in civilizations that don't have lights
on at night can reliably menstruate during the new moon, since
ovulation is inspired by the light of the full moon. It can
be said that women in civilized society - where electric lights
are on all over the place at night - are in a different "living"
environment.
But that's light, not tides and gravitation . . .
<_Jym_>
|
192.3 | View from the stars | NATASH::BUTCHART | | Fri Aug 22 1986 12:55 | 40 |
| Astrologically speaking, it could be a real nightmare--although
if one was investigatively minded, it could be extremely interesting
to colonize another world.
Astrological symbolism evolved within our solar system from a
geocentric standpoint. What kind of different factors would be
introduced if one were born on, say, one of the moons of Jupiter?
And if one was born in a different star system altogether none of
the old rules would apply. It would take many, many generations
of observation to correlate people's characteristics with the local
planets, moons, and whatall.
The thing I am curious about is: the planets, considered on a mythic
and psychological level, represent basic drives in the human nature.
If it is indeed true that the planetary positions at our birth
influence our nature, would our basic nature change as a result
of no longer being on the earth? Interesting to contemplate.
BTW, even though astrologers speak of the planets as "causing" the
traits that appear in people, the fact is that we don't truly know
_why_ the correspondence exists. Astrology was developed through
empiric observation, and provides a model for the human nature.
_No one really knows why this model works._ My favorite phrase
about this is "correlation does not automatically imply causation",
a fact that many forget in the ordinary affairs of life. Just because
I can use a correlative method to predict does not mean I know what's
causing it.
Anyway, back to living on other worlds: it is also reasonable to
assume (it seems to me) that living on another planet would slowly
physically alter the population in some way. Different exposures
to different radiations, light wavelengths, magnetic fields--who
knows what could happen to the gene pool? One wonders if there
would be those who would "fail to thrive" because their systems
could not adjust to local conditions. Would _anyone_ thrive, for
that matter? If not, would we have to carry around our own little
environmental bubbles to simulate earth-y conditions?
Marcia
|
192.4 | View from the poles. | PBSVAX::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Fri Aug 22 1986 14:53 | 8 |
| RE: .3
I've seen similar speculations about the astrological effects of
being born above the Arctic circle: a very different apparent
astrological environment than the sub-sub-tropical region where
astrology was developed.
Topher
|
192.5 | Basically true, but there is a way we handle it | NATASH::BUTCHART | | Mon Aug 25 1986 17:33 | 29 |
| re: The view from the Poles
All of the astrological house systems in use today, with the exception
of the Equal House System, go to considerable lengths to figure
out just how long it takes each zodiacal sign to cross overhead
at "your" latitude. Anyone born north of about the 35th parallel
and not born close to the equinoxes is likely to have at least one
sign pair "intercepted" in his/her natal chart. The intercepted
sign pair has no house cusps crossing it. I am still working on
interpreting interceptions (they are difficult to "read" easily)
but I have noticed that finding the right "outlet" (read House Cusp)
for the energies of the sign pair seems to be something of a
preoccupation with anyone who has an interception. This can be
an occasional annoyance or a massive compulsion, depending upon
the rest of the chart.
I read an interesting account in one of my texts of a person born
in Alaska who had _3_ sign pairs intercepted in her chart! The
astrologer writing the book said that she recalculated her client's
chart 5 times, not believing what she was coming up with. When she
was finally satisfied she was correct, she found that her client's
life and psyche had indeed lived up to her unusual chart.
Calculating and interpreting interceptions is one of the more modern
astrological techniques. As Topher says, the basic system evolved
in tropical climes and this type of thing was unaccounted for in,
say, ancient Babylonia.
Marcia
|
192.6 | Making the Adjustment | AKOV68::FRETTS | | Tue Sep 09 1986 17:18 | 12 |
| re .3.4.5
It seems that as man has evolved and has become ready to deal with
certain energies, new planets have been discovered and astrology
has had to make room (and purpose) for them. Part of me feels that
we as spirit have participated in the setup of the blueprint or
map which we call our birthchart. If at some future date we begin
to colonize other planets, and spirit incarnates there, those beings
will have already constructed the blueprints to fit the energies
at work. Wouldn't it be great to see Earth in a birthchart??
|
192.7 | we bring our history, not our planet | TERZA::ZANE | | Tue Nov 10 1987 17:40 | 28 |
|
Hmm. Neat topic. But, I don't understand. Why wouldn't the colonists
eventually adjust to their new world with all of its new rhythms and
eventually develop their own astrology? In fact, it might be fun to
"create" things we already know and understand in a completely new context.
Wouldn't it be fun to rediscover astrology and really understand (by
first-hand experience) how it all came about?
Really, I would think that each world had its own spirits and possibly
unexplored mythology in the same way that it would have its own flora
and fauna.
Maybe the original colonists would have difficulty adjusting to 16 or
28 hour days, for example, and would artificially set up cycles that
they were used to. But, eventually, the colonists would become natives
and cycles that are odd to us Earthlings would be completely natural
to them.
To take this even further: suppose that lightning always preceded rain
on this planet. The natives might engage in lightning dances, not rain
dances. And so on. I think it would be fascinating to see just how
much the "earth", the planet affects the history and development of
its peoples...
Terza
|