T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
131.1 | | HYSTER::HITCHCOCK | Chuck Hitchcock | Mon May 12 1986 12:28 | 46 |
| One of the most promising "revisionist" movements within the
Craft is the grafting of Shamanic techniques onto the tradition.
In the Boston area there is a group that has been doing this kind
of work (publicly, I might add) for several years. In Wisconsin
the national networking group (called "Circle") is based on what
they call Wiccan Shamanism.
Many people who have been involved in Gardnerian or Alexandrian
Wicca eventually become disenchanted ;-) with those groups
because they're very hierarchical and the rituals are more boring
than high Episcopal services. (I've probably started a psychic
war with that last sentence, so I'd better throw in a disclaimer
that there are many groups who are an exception.)
The significance of combining Shamanism and Witchcraft (I'm going
to refer to it as "SW" for Shamanic Wicca, henceforth) is that
the Shamanic element provides the techiques for breaking down and
rebuilding the personality while the tradition and rituals of
Wicca provides the grounding necessary to "find your way back"
(ie., stay grounded) while doing this work.
Techniques derived from Shamanism are directed toward finding
power spots, becoming aware of the universe as a living,
intelligent source of insight and personal teachings, creating an
alternate personality (referred to as the Magickal Self in SW)
and developing the ability to Shape Shift.
Combined with the techniques of Wicca that symbolize the powers
of the earth as the four elements, the transitions of the year,
and the power of a small group of fellow travelers, SW can be an
amazing experience in combining self-exploration with a psychic
community. I've been to hundreds of groups who are doing
different kinds of psychic development work, but by far and away
there is nothing that comes close to a group of people who come
together in sacred space (the Wiccan Circle) and have developed the
ability to Shape Shift (which is not easy even by oneself), and
then build on that energy and for astral journeying, healing,
past lives regression, charging crystals, divination, what have
you.
The work usually provokes enough anxiety in people that a great
deal of the preliminary work in SW is working with confronting
one's fear of the unknown...the terror that is the core of our
beings.
/chuck
|
131.2 | Some Additional Resources | HYSTER::HITCHCOCK | Chuck Hitchcock | Wed May 14 1986 11:29 | 40 |
| I went through my library this morning to see what was lying
around on this subject. A Briton who lives in Austrialia named
Nevill Drury has an interesting set of books out, the two most
recent of which discuss many similiar themes to Shamanism and
magic. They are "The Shaman and the Magician: Journeys Between
the Worlds," 1982 Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd. (in Europe: 39
Store Street, London WC1E 7DD, England; in the US: 9 Park St,
Boston MA 02108) and "Vision Quest: A Personal Journey Through
Magic and Shamanism," 1984 PRISM Press (published in England by
Purnell & Sons, Paulton, Bristol).
Appendix B of "Vision Quest" lists several resources, none of
which I can vouch for, but here they are:
For Magic
The D.O.M.E. Foundation: 217 W. San Francisco, Sante Fe,
NM, 87501
Servants of the Light (SOL): PO Box 215, St Helier, Jersey,
The Channel Islands
The Source: PO Box 367, Lane Cove, Sydney, Austrial 2066
For Shamanism
The Center for Shamanic Studies: Bos 673, Belden Station,
Norwalk, CT 06852
Human Dimensions West Institute: PO Box 5037, Ojai CA
The Australian Shamanic Centre: PO Box 193, Lidcombe,
New South Wales, Australia
2141
Both these books discuss his experimentation with shamanism. He
comes from an interesting family: both his father and grandmother
were very involved in Theosophy. Imagine being raised by
theosophists! Awesome.
Another person who is doing a lot of work with popularizing
Shamanism is Michael Harner whose book "The Way of the Shaman,"
Harper & Row, gives several techniques on shamanism. He also
does numerous workshops all over the country, which people seem
to get a lot out of (I've been told).
/chuck
|
131.3 | the NEW MAJIC | BRAT::WALLIS | | Thu May 22 1986 10:06 | 22 |
| I get a kick out of the general population who keep using the w`ords
"MAJIC" and " PSYCHIC" like it is something only a few possess.
It is only another sense which, I grant, many are afraid of,
but often use without knowing about it! It's just another ability
which needs to be developed and people are finding that out slowly
but surely.
In ref to the new "majic" it is the wave of today and just part
of the evolutionary process of becoming more aware. Healers
have been involved in this kind of work for a while. I can give
anyone names of some fine healers in the area who work with the
subtle energies and get very good results. The more cleansing
the healer does on him/herself the more they are able to help
others and there are some folks moving at an accelerated rate.
Therefore you're begining to see people integrate all the forms
of healing - as they are based on the same universal laws, the
difference is in how people can relate to them so an eclectic
becomes preferred.
|
131.4 | Several Interesting Points in .3 | HYSTER::HITCHCOCK | Chuck Hitchcock | Tue May 27 1986 18:13 | 44 |
| Re: .3
>I get a kick out of the general population who keep using the w`ords
>"MAJIC" and " PSYCHIC" like it is something only a few possess.
>It is only another sense which, I grant, many are afraid of,
>but often use without knowing about it! It's just another ability
>which needs to be developed and people are finding that out slowly
>but surely.
I agree with the general flavor of your point, namely that this
is "stuff" we (us humans) have access to--and use--as a matter of
course. But what is the difference between magic and psychic
[ability]? You may be interested in the discussion specifically
on magic in note 129.
I've often wondered why people are afraid of their psychic
ability. I know that when I've experienced my own psychic
abilities it does have the tendency to freak me out a bit, but I
haven't really understood why. Culteral conditioning?
And is your spelling of magic as "majic" representative of a
specific use of the word or just a misspelling on your part?
>In ref to the new "majic" it is the wave of today and just part
>of the evolutionary process of becoming more aware.
I've been wondering if there really is any evolutionary process
to the human race. It seems to me the metaphor of evolution has
been applied to just about everything. In fact, I don't think it
would be too difficult to make an argument that when it comes to
psychic development, the human race is DE-evolving. Has anyone
ever adequetly explained how the pyramids were built? What
about the genius of the ancient Vedic literature? If we're
evolving, then why hasn't there been anything surpassing that? The
late Mircea Eliade, who was well acquinted with the occult,
believed that our psychic talent is fairly fixed as a race.
>Healers have been involved in this kind of work for a while. I
>can give anyone names of some fine healers in the area who work
>with the subtle energies and get very good results.
Please feel free to add you references to note 117.
/Chuck
|
131.5 | Well ... | INK::KALLIS | | Wed May 28 1986 09:11 | 41 |
| re .4:
The construction of the pyramids has been explained "adequately"
by Egyptologists. A problem in discussing mildly abstruse things
is that often people _want_ to look for the mysterious. Case in
point:
There have been reams of articles and not a few books written on
the "mystery" of the statues of Rapa Nui [aka Easter Island]. These
statues of long-eared people were considered particularly mysterious
because "no known means" was available for the natives to carve
them in the numbers they did nor to erect them without power tools
beyond their available technology. This "mystery" was explained
from everything from spacemen to native magical or psychokinetic
powers to levitate the statues into place.
Then, the amateur anthropologist/archeologist Thor Heyerdahl visited
Rapa Nui. He checked with the natives, who showed him both the
carving technique and the methodology by which the statues were
erected. Both were surprisingly simple in execution (the carving
was a sophisticated technique but was achievable with simple tools),
and he documented both methods photographically. When he commented
that until he was shown these things, the processes were unknown.
The native leader shrugged and said, "Nobody asked us." [Anyone
who wants to read of these, I suggest you read Heyerdahl's book,
_Aku-Aku_, where he details the techniques. It's a pleasant read
anyway.]
Regarding "evolution" and its reverse, it's early to say what's
happening in the parapsychological arena. I suspect that the advance
of medicine is doing strange things to the gene pool (more types
survive than before), so it'll take even longer than "natural" to
find out.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
P.S,.: If memory serves, a fairly good description of pyramid
construction is in L. Sprague Decamp's book _The Ancient Engineers_.
-S
|
131.6 | the term evolution! | BRAT::WALLIS | | Wed May 28 1986 15:48 | 27 |
| The comments about the evolutionary developement in regard to
the paranormal is interesting and a topic for a lenghty discussion.
As you're well aware of, the "secrets" have long been available
to those who have dedicated their lives to it - the Veda chants
are a good example however, it's my impression (and it may not
be correct) that this is the first time in our history, excluding
the isolated cases of Atlantis and MOO when the energies have
presented themselvesto the general populace - ie the deva world is
again presentingitself to help us raise the general vibration of the total
environment -internal and external.
Of course, another way of looking at it may be the coming of the New
Age (and I realize that's a loaded term) may have something to it as
it professes to ushers in the higher vibrations - therefore
affecting all who are willing and capable at this point to
participate.
Awareness is a funny phenomenon and may have a lot to do with
how we judge ourselves and others - who can really say who's
more aware than another, I wouldn't want to have to call it!
However, to clear up any misconceptions, I'd like to qualify
my use of "evolution" as it pertains to the gradual spreading within a species
of something different.
-Lora
|
131.7 | Also Paranormal Learning | HYSTER::HITCHCOCK | Chuck Hitchcock | Wed May 28 1986 16:32 | 35 |
| Re: .6
Your last comment sparked something that was in the back of my
mind in my earlier reply, but I forgot to mention.
I've been doing (I'd have to say, "a little") reading on the
concept of morphogenic fields, which is the concept that learning
or awareness is not bound by space and time.
Apparently there was an experiment done with teaching rats
something (on the order of pressing a lever for something), with
the experimental group in the US and the control group (the group
of rats that weren't being taught anything) in the UK. The
results were that the UK rats picked up the same trait! (I don't
know what kinds of controls there were, such as double blind or
whatever).
But to your reply specifically, I actually *do* hold this weird
belief that because there definitely is an increase in paranormal
development throughout the world (many instances have been
mentioned in this notes file) that perhaps the other energies
that share the planet are beginning to respond to the increased
intention in this form of communication.
One thing that I know for sure (I've mentioned elsewhere) is that
belief mediates our perceptions of reality, and the more one lets
go of disbelief,[*] the more one's natural tendency to accept the
world as a matrix of interrelated energies tends to emerge.
At least, I *think* that's how it works!
Chuck
* I guess I would elaborate on that to say the it's the belief
that we have no psychic rapport with our environment that's so
constricting.
|
131.8 | Think of it as evolution in action | VLNVAX::DDANTONIO | DDA | Wed May 28 1986 18:23 | 24 |
| Physical evolution is still proceeding and will never stop. It is a
relatively simple process and cannot help but do things. The human
race is interfering by keeping alive gene traits that are destructive.
So physical evolution is being "subverted" in this regard. But it still
does operate. But it is a slow process so don't expect humans to mutate
(baring Chernoybl) quickly into something else!
Cultral evolution works in the Lamarckian (sp?) mode, namely the elders
(and others) pass solutions to problems they have discovered IN THEIR
LIFETIME onto their offspring. The media and communication in general is
passing HUGH amounts of information to us daily so it doesn't suprise me
that interest in and inquiry into psychic phenomenon. There is more
information available about EVERYTHING and more people who are investigating
anything.
If there is a gene combination that allows psychic abilities, there is a
fairly good chance it will get expressed today, even if it has negative
side-effects (as long as it isn't lethal). People aren't killing witches
anymore (at least not usually). Research is taking paranormal abilities
far more seriously, despite the fakes. If there is a physical basis for
paranormal abilites, it will probably be found.
DDA
|
131.9 | Global Polarization | HYSTER::HITCHCOCK | Chuck Hitchcock | Thu May 29 1986 12:13 | 26 |
| Re: .8
Actually, the way I see it is that your comment represents one
side of what's happening; which is to say it's no incorrect, but
consider this:
The other side is a world-wide trend to force the structures of
societies and cultures into a rigid mode. Most obvious case in
point is the global shift towards fundamentalism. Both in the
political scheme as well as the religious (Islam is probably
better at this than Christianity is in many ways).
This other side is the reactionary side. Why is this happening
along side the more expressive, expansive, intuitive, "I'm
responsible for my own reality" [Ugh!] type thinking, as
represented by interest in Shamanism, "Acting locally, thinking
globally" expressions?
Well, I think there's a polarization occuring in the world
centered on a fundamental belief: Do we believe we live in an
abundant universe that will always take care of us? Or do we
believe in a limited universe in which I'd better get mine now
before it runs out?
Abundance vs. Limitation. What do you think?
/chuck
|
131.10 | Oppositions | 2LITTL::BERNSTEIN | The 10th Doctor | Thu May 29 1986 14:20 | 29 |
| Forces rising in opposition to one another:
Expansive Contractive
--------- -----------
Youth Elders
Shamanism Fundamentalism
Communication and Cooperation Domination and Seperation
Incorporation of all cultures Ethnocentrism
Act Locally, Think Globally Act Globally, Think Locally
Freedom from the past Preserve the past
Learn from the children Indoctrinate the children
All things are connected All things are seperate
I grow in the growing of any I grow at the expense of all
------ ----
Female Male
This is getting a little beyond the usual realm of this
conference, but it is important to understand that the mechanisms
behind things like politics are consistant with a subtle and simple
yet powerful law of the universe. The many mystical traditions agree
to an amazing degree because through hundreds of generations, a
body of data was collected, understood, incorporated, and passed
down that would make the scientific research of the last 100 years
look like a drop in the bucket.
Now I forget, how did we get on this subject? Maybe we could
use another note...
Ed
|
131.11 | Spreading The Wealth or Blame | INK::KALLIS | | Thu May 29 1986 14:59 | 25 |
| re .9, .10:
I think it's a little more complicated than the classic Yin-Yang
construct.
.9:
There are concentrations rather than polarizations, since
"polarization" implies a dualism. The CSICOP type who is as adamantly
opposed to serious investigation of the paranormal is just as bad
as the religious fundamentalist who is adamantly opposed to the
investigation of paranormal phenomena, but for entirely different
reasons (the average CSICOP is likely to be opposed to the religious
fundamentalist's view in other areas). A perusal of other areas
will show similar complexities.
.10:
Your model is a little too simplistic, for some of the reasons
mentioned above. How about "evasive" and "confrontational" forces,
or whatever?
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
131.12 | more on reality | BRAT::WALLIS | | Thu May 29 1986 15:25 | 49 |
| re .7
Awareness is and isn't a subjective experience. Awareness become thoughts
and are energy forms directed by our intent and beliefs, pushed
into manifestation by desire and emotion - if the environment can
sustain them while they form(we could get into a whole discusion on
clearing the neg energies etc...but later for that).
When blocks or letting go of limiting beliefs break it breaks the
energy for the person. It also frees up the cumulative
environmental energy*. I believe the momentum is becoming stronger
because there is literally more room for folks to let go and expand.
When we were in the Picean Age the energy was so constricted that folk
s could hardly breath (certainly not psychically) - this was
also witnessed in the Pilgram times when folks were burned as
witches....they almost had to go nuts to break thru the
denseness!
Fear and anger are low vibrations and functions of the
lower chakras. They become disruptive and interfere with the
functioning of the higher side of the charkras unless here is balance.
For every being who becomes more realized there are others who
are vibrating at the same frequencey who aslo have a release
and therefore can make personal choice at that time to clear
and "purify" if you will at that junction - or not!
You may be interested in some of Seth material such as Seth Speaks
and the Nature of Personal Reality. His main theme is that we
create our own reality and are responsibile for it. He aslo
speaks to multiple dimentions/realities coexisting. It has been
my experience that this is true. We tend to believe in linear
time and space because everyone else does - it kinds of holds
our world together.I suggest it is only a belief and a limitation
The miracles which are happening in healing and other realms
with the subtle energies can attest to that- at least for me
personally and others I know.
- Lora
* there is a documented (I believe) story called the 100th Monkey
where (and I take license here) an island of rare monkeys somewhere
in the So Pacific began eating a certain fruit or food
not normally consumed. The same behavior, at the same time was
exibited in the same kind of monkeys in Australia. I have also
experiencesd this phenomenon myself.
|
131.13 | Abundance or no | BRAT::WALLIS | | Thu May 29 1986 19:15 | 11 |
| re: < Do we believe in an abundant universe that will always
take care of us or.....
My vote: most of the human species believes the world (most directly
our particular form) and maybe the universe is a hostile place
(reference also the principal of being seperate i.e apart from
the whole) and to be feared. We have done a fine job of what's so
fondly referred to as the "self-full-filling prophesy"
|
131.14 | opps | BRAT::WALLIS | | Thu May 29 1986 19:19 | 5 |
|
principal should be principle - but you already knew
that!
|
131.16 | 100 monkey syndrome | MARIAH::DENHAM | Keep Smiling. They'll wonder what you're up to | Fri May 30 1986 11:33 | 7 |
| The impact on the "100 monkey" experiment is that it is being used
by people, who by agreeing to join with others at the same time
across the world to meditate at a certain time on issues like world
peace, hope by the same mechanism to transform everyone to
peacefulness.
Kathleen
|
131.17 | Start general, get specific later. | 2LITTL::BERNSTEIN | The 10th Doctor | Fri May 30 1986 12:41 | 30 |
| re .10 model:
I wasn't really trying to build a comprehensive theory, just
note the forces of opposition. Just as with Yin and Yang, nothing
exists as a pure form of one or the other, everything is a subtle
mix of the two. The problem is the imbalances that arise. What I
was trying to show were tendencies...when a strong contractive
political force exerts itself, the expansive force needs to rise
to counter it, or else the balance is lost.
In Chinese diagnosis (for example) more than the simple dualism
of Yin and Yang are used. I've seen the use of the Five Elements
in terms of foods (Earth, Air, Fire, Water, and Metal), where each
of these categories is again broken into the fudamental dialectic
of Yin and Yang. I'm sure there are literally hundreds or thousands
of further subdivisions, given the Chinese obsession with detail.
Still, any Taoist or Buddhist analysis needs to begin at the simple
fundamental tendencies of Yin and Yang, Male and Female, dark and
light, Earth and Heaven.
The West's "Scientific Method" has a lot to learn from the
approriateness of detail used in the East. The dialectic is also
something which has been used in the West many times, discovered
independently, but never well understood by anyone except the
discoverer, and without ever reaching the mainstream of accepted public
knowledge. For example, Hegel, Maxwell, and Dirac each used a very
Yin-Yang like metaphor which lead to some immense leaps in
understanding the universe.
Ed
|
131.18 | Many Words, One Reality...Sort of | HYSTER::HITCHCOCK | Chuck Hitchcock | Fri May 30 1986 13:12 | 20 |
| I think every analysis is an artificial snapshot of fluid reality
regardless of whether you're talking about political, social,
economic or spiritual movements. Even the terms we use--the
words--are representations of perceptions. So, I agree with the
previous few comments.
Re: .11
> There are concentrations rather than polarizations, since
> "polarization" implies a dualism.
I think the concentrations are the manifestation of
polarizations, and that it implies a dialectical movement of
opposites forming new alliances and being changed in itself.
Hegal was very influenced by Schopenhauer who based a great deal
of his stuff on the Vedanta and Upanishads.
Working with the movement of energy and learning how to channel
it according to one's will is the heart of the Craft and Shamanism.
/chuck
|
131.19 | Personal power - individual responsibility | MILRAT::KEEFE | | Fri May 30 1986 13:53 | 110 |
| RE: the last few
The problems being faced by the human race today - nuclear
holocaust, war, massive famine, starvation and disease, economic
collapse - all abound because the individual has failed in his
responsibility to claim his own connection to the shift in
consciousness. Instead, each tentatively waits for some other
person to correct the imbalance, some politician, scientist or
religious leader.
The responsibility for living harmoniously rests with each
individual. As each person spiritually and cosmically comes of
age, claiming his/her attunement and therefore his involvement in
the business of mankind, a beautiful new energy will be released
which will gradually swing the Earth into alignment with the
universal forces of harmony and peace. This period of awareness
will happen, but only when each man and woman looks beyond the
exterior to the interior of their being to discover their own
personal power through their connection to the Ultimate of All
Energies. Realization of ones own connection is a gift to all
others, for it signifies one's own readiness to participate in and
use one's own energies for a world where love and awareness are
the core.
Now the Earth exists as a place of unrealized and unaligned
energy. Because it is struggling does not mean people have chosen
a wrong path; for there is no wrong path. They simply have yet to
choose a path that aligns with the higher forces. The result of
this is that Earth is in "neutral." Too many citizens of the
planet wait hesitatingly for something or someone to claim their
allegiance. Most have inadvertently frozen their dynamic choices
and allowed neutrality to win the day.
But "neutral" can be a very dangerous space, as people are
discovering. For "neutral", by it's very definition, means
assuming a non-choice or refraining from making a choice, and in
this case no choice is a choice. It is a choice for the status
quo. Unfortunately there is no status quo. Nothing remains the
same for even two consecutive seconds. Change is a dynamic which
must be recognized and embraced. Acceptance of change will be
crucial as the Earth shifts into forward gear.
Earth is embroiled in an intense power struggle. This conflict
exists between countries, states, cities and individuals, as well
as between the spiritual and physical aspects of each individual.
The basis is always the same: to be recognized, even honored, for
possessing the most power. More and more countries are vying with
each other for the world's resources and prestige, both through
political and physical manipulation. It is a time of strict
demarcation of boundaries as each separate group of peoples
struggles unsuccessfully to bolster changing economic and national
value systems. The people of the world are being pulled this way
and that, with governments scrambling to prove that the prosperity
of the past is just ahead in the form of a new economic package or
a new war against a supposed aggressor.
There have always been a few farsighted people speaking out on the
issues involving humanity. But now, more and more will listen and
learn, question and decide that they too wish to opt for the
presence of a harmonious world community; the emergence of a
balanced planet. These voices, while at first considered strange,
will be gradually integrated into the mainstream of everyday life.
Herein lies the basis for the great conflict.
There will be strong elements of the world's societies which will
tenaciously cling to the old, remaining with the inhumane and
unsupportable economic and social policies of the past. These
groups will violently oppose the new voices raised in love,
calling for world peace and a change in the repression, violence
and non-productive leanings of the past. The struggle will be
creative against static, vision against rhetoric.
The world as a group can remain a poorly integrated and
ineffective body or it can become a viable unified group. The
world group has options. It possesses the power to manifest
mammoth planetary devastation, destroying much of Earth's life in
its wake. The world group also holds the power to creatively
manifest a different reality, a reality of spiritual awareness,
each according to his own vision. The sooner the individual
becomes aware of his responsibility to himself and his world
group, the sooner the wars and aggression-oriented thinking will
stop. Personal power is the issue at the very heart of the
disaster crisis. For without personal power, the individual will
remain frozen and inactive too long, and all will gradually slide
beyond recognition into depression. With personal power, the
individual and world group will invite planetary awareness into
their lives and openly live a broader view of their spiritual
beliefs. The people of this planet must become cognizant of their
God-given right and responsibility to challenge the course of
human evolution, making course-corrections to change the destiny
of man.
This is the ultimate challenge of survival. Either we discover who
we really are, or we perish from ignorance of our true connection.
The choice is each person's, to use personal and group power as it
can be used for the advancement of mankind or to use one's
God-given potential for the destruciton of mankind and the
disruption of the Earth. It is the responsibility of all who are
aware to make this tenuous balance known, that none may later say
they did not understand that all was being held in the balance. As
each person moves through each day, he must realize he is choosing
not only his own course but also the course of his planet. Every
voice is heard and counts in this rush to understand and explain
the direction in which Earth moves. The choices that are made this
day will determine the planet's future or lack thereof. As man
recognizes his physical limitations, he effectively opens himself
to the vision of the future, and this vision becomes the course by
which he sets his standards. Let us all hope that enough make the
choice soon.
|
131.20 | | HYSTER::HITCHCOCK | Chuck Hitchcock | Fri May 30 1986 15:52 | 2 |
| Re: .19
Wow!
|
131.21 | Upward Mobility | INK::KALLIS | | Fri May 30 1986 16:25 | 28 |
| re .19:
I can agree partially with this, but it overlooks factors. the
occultist, Gareth Knight, posits in various writings a model of
humanity starting with mythopoetic "Atlanteans," who were "civilized"
but who lacked individuality (i.e., were a sort of homogeneous gestalt
race). "Modern man," he suggests, was created by a level of
consciousness raising so that people developed individuality (a
form of increased awareness).
This evolution hasn't ceased. Despite the seeming diversities and
lapses, the _overall_ human consciousness has been raised immensely
through the centuries, and has been accelerated via communication.
The droughts in Africa would be of no copncern to the majority of
people in the world as little as 100 years ago; now many care.
This process continues. If it appears that we're still as insensitive
and uncaring as we used to be, recall that in the Old West of the
U.S. a century ago, a public hanging was a festive occasion, where
people would come for miles to watch men dance on the end of a rope.
In short, there is evolution where there may seem to be none: what
looks like circular travel really is a helix.
The Light to you all.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
131.22 | FREEDOM | BRAT::WALLIS | | Fri May 30 1986 16:48 | 12 |
|
re .19
BRAVO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
YOU SAID IT ALL - NICE WORK BILL
PS You might want to consider publishing this, it's too important
not to be shared with others outside DEC.
|
131.23 | For now... | LATOUR::EBERNSTEIN | Listen like thieves | Sat May 31 1986 03:52 | 9 |
| re .19:
How about posting it in MLOKAI::PROSE? That's a place to collect
notes that stand out as text (as well as a place to post stories,
articles, and other prosey things).
I liked it too.
Ed
|
131.24 | Dawning Consciousness and the Great Years | NATASH::BUTCHART | | Wed Jun 04 1986 10:43 | 107 |
| Re: .19
A conversation about this evolved at the Gathering and some people
asked if a shift in consciousness was indeed indicated astrologically
and how and when this type of thing happened. What is the Age of
Aquarius, anyway?
The Ages are tied to the astrological Great Years, which are tied
astronomically to what is called the precession of the equinoxes.
The sign the Sun is in when it crosses the equator for its journey
north (in spring) and south (in fall) changes slowly since the Earth's
axis rotates, much like a top spinning on a table. (It always interes-
ted me as a child to find out that we'd have a different Pole Star
in a few zillion years; another result of the spinning top phenomenon.)
Going back into history, both recorded and prehistoric, we find
that the equinoxes have precessed through the signs Cancer, Gemini,
Taurus, Aries, and our current Age of Pisces.
Psychologically, springtime (and the equinox) has the feeling of
beginnings and initiations. Thus, whatever sign the Sun is _really_
in when it crosses the equator tends to be the starting point for
the dominant ethos and character of the cultures of the world.
To be sure, there are holdovers from other Ages throughout the world
but the world "soul" itself tends to take on the feeling of the
sign the Sun is really in when the equinox occurs. Thus, the
archetypes of the Mother Goddess and the start of agrarian work
was part of the Stone Age cultures in the Age of Cancer (which has
to do with the Mother and food, among other things). The initial
rise of civilasations that organized and recorded their culture
was charactistic of the Geminian Age (Gemini has to do with the
mental faculties and communication). The woman-powered civilisations
were at their peak during the Taurean Age (Taurus is a power sign
and also "female" or yin in nature). The Arian Age began the patri-
archal cultures, and also seems to be when the astrological principles
that we still use and know today were codified (I find this interesting
because with the equinox _truly_ in the sign Aries, the springtime
sign, it would seem that those principles could have been most easily
perceived.) The Age of Pisces saw a change in ethos from the joys
of war to the ideal of peace (Pisces is a compassionate and ethereal
sign). The most powerful exemplar of the Piscean Age was Jesus,
who refused to lead his disciples to war, indeed suggested that
the struggles the Jews were then involved in were not the real issue;
He worked for a beautiful vision of a spiritually united world.
His death was also a good example of what happens when the Great
Years are in transition. There are the people who perceive the
future and run forth to meet it, and the reactionary factions who
desparately wish to cling to the safety of the old consciousness.
This could be what is happening today, that the New Age is indeed
dawning. The "official" beginning of the Age of Aquarius won't
happen for another 325 years. The equinox precesses at the rate
of approximate one minute of celestial longitude per year, so it's
slow. But maybe by then we'll be more truly ready for it.
Because the Age is indeed on the horizon; it is dawn. Just as daylight
appears long before the Sun actually rises, so the light of a new
Age appears long before it actually begins. When interpreting transits
for people, astrologers often give an approaching transit a wide
orb of influence, which means that the person will feel the first
stirrings of the change before the transit is exact. An orb of
as much as 5 degrees is sometimes used for approaching transits,
and the equinox is at approximately 5 degrees of Pisces. The stirrings
of change in the psyche often bring about uneasiness with the old
order, a sense that change is due, and a desire to cling to the
old, especially if it is greatly loved. This seems to be what is
happening today.
An interesting detail to note is the sign on the other side of the
zodiac from the sign the spring equinox has precessed into. It
often provides the complement to the chief energy of the age. So
what can be said about the Age we are passing out of and the one
we are passing into? The two energies of the Piscean Age were faith
and sacrifice (Pisces) and reason and logic (Virgo). The vicious
arguments of the people who wholly espouse only one side of this
coin are well known to us. It is more of a challenge to make the
two serve each other, as we who are interested in psychic phenomena
know. The ethos of the Aquarian Age will be humanitarian detachment
(Aquarius) and empowerment (Leo). Already I hear the same type
of arguments rising between people who believe that societal/world
concerns for the good of all are incompatible with having personal
power. You can see it in the governments of countries after a
"liberating" revolution, wherein the new government decides that
the collective should be more powerful than any individual and ends
up with a regime at least as restricting as the old.
We are also hearing passionate arguments between proponents of the
ethos of both ages. The people who claim that spiritual faith (Pisces)
must not be corrupted by a shred of intellectual perception (Aquarius),
the people who claim that you cannot be yourself (Leo) if you also
serve (Virgo). I don't believe the actual world events themselves
are any more or less terrible than at the dawning of other Great
Years. But what we _do_ have, I believe, is more awareness of them,
as was so eloquently pointed out in another reply to this note.
This awareness is, in itself, very Aquarian. The notion of one
world and the idea that what one does personally (Leo) affects us
all (Aquarius) is part of the feeling of the new age also. "We
are the world (Aquarius), we are the children (Leo)" says the song.
The poignant impact of that song and the effort that drove it speak
to how strongly many feel the new energy.
This is indeed a dangerous time, for the ones who would see the
new age enter with the human race intact must exert all their
intelligence and craft and patience to attain that end.
I believe we are the midwives, folks.
Marcia
|
131.25 | | HYSTER::HITCHCOCK | Chuck Hitchcock | Wed Jun 04 1986 12:28 | 23 |
| Re: .24
Thanks for that analysis, as I was one of the people who had
asked for your explanation. There's a lot to digest, but one
comment you made toward the end is open for debate, namely,
>I don't believe the actual world events themselves
>are any more or less terrible than at the dawning of other Great
>Years.
It seems to me that the *capacity* to annihilate the world
several times over, to the point where it can not sustain life in
any form forever after, is fundamentally different than at any
other time in history. True, the "actual world events
themselves" are probably still about the same on the
pleasure/pain continuum, but the ability to completely wipe out
life on our planet is having a major impact on how we view
ourselves and our relations.
In light of your analysis, especially regarding how the
influences of the dawning age are starting to influence this
current age, I'm curious how you see this.
/chuck
|
131.26 | (Not Unlimited) Faith In People ... | INK::KALLIS | | Wed Jun 04 1986 12:48 | 13 |
| re .25:
The capacity to destrioy life on Earth several times over was first
realized by the close of World War I when various types of poison
gas were developed.
That they never were used on as large scale during or after World
War I is a good sign.
Maybe there _is_ some sort of dawning consciousness.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
131.27 | More on the Aquarian Age (and faith) | NATASH::BUTCHART | | Wed Jun 04 1986 14:01 | 60 |
| Re: .25 & .26
That is, indeed, a good point about humanity's capacity to destroy
itself. I think that the power has been given us, in a way, in
order to make us realise, at last, that we hold our destiny in our
own hands. To shock us into the necessary Aquarian awareness.
It is this awareness, I feel that is fundamentally different.
To speak of atomic energy: that type of energy is said to be ruled
by the planet Pluto (plutonium?). Historically oriented astrologers
like to make much of the fact that Pluto was discovered at the same
time that atomic energy research was really getting underway before
the 2nd World War. The discovery of how to manipulate this energy
has given us the means to destroy ourselves, but the energy, (like
the planet) has been there all along.
Which brings up an interesting question: given that Pluto can
represent tremendous power with destructive capacity, how _did_
it manifest in older, less aware times? Were whole populations
ever destroyed by Plutonian means? You bet they were--by the Great
Plagues. Pluto, you see, is said to rule the tiniest seeds (atoms,
microbes, the human gametes) that can either create or destroy.
Microorganisms which cause life, but also disease, are Plutonian
in nature. It is sobering to realise that countries could be almost
completely depopulated by disease, a nasty historical fact of life
that we are usually (in the US anyhow) well protected from. Half
the population of Midaeval (sp?) Europe perished from Bubonic Plague.
The terror people experience around AIDS today used to be commonplace.
My own mother remembers being quarantined because of scarlet fever.
Before Pluto was discovered, people experienced disease as something
that "happened to" them. Many considered that sickness was either
God's punishment for sin or part of God's testing (a la Job) plan.
It wasn't really til the mid 20th century that people really began
to get a handle on controlling disease on a mass scale. Not long
after the discovery of Pluto, come to think. Then, with atomic
research, it almost seems like The Great Designer was saying, "okay,
you've learned how to master _that_ Plutonian manifestation, let's
see how you do with _this_ one. Maybe this one will make you realise
that control of this energy is the key to your survival. If this
doesn't wake you up, nothing will."
Well, as you allude, it seems control of nuclear power really is the
key to our survival. We still have to see how well we midwife this
one. But the other events, the droughts, famines, natural disasters,
et al have been going on for a good, long time. The positive thing
I find is that our (admittedly flawed) efforts to control the Plutonian
energy have resulted in a global awareness that makes us increaslingly
and poignantly aware of the state of our fellows elsewhere. The
real heartbreaking question is not "Why is this all happening now?"
but instead "S___! You mean these things have been going on all
along and we never knew it?" It almost seems as if the atomic crisis
was a necessary spur to the development of real humanitarian
consciousness.
These are definitely my own thoughts and views. I have tremendous
hope along with the fear and so I am encouraged to keep trying instead
of folding up.
Marcia
|
131.28 | Gaia would still live | GALACH::MORGAN | Protector of all good mice. | Sat Jun 07 1986 21:29 | 13 |
| I would like to add very quickly that we cannot destroy the world...
We can only destroy ourselves and other living things. 100,000
years later new life forms would have appeared on Gaia. So when
we speak of destroying or changing something lets please be specific
about what we are talking about.
My fear here is that if we change our enviroment so that it will
not support the usual life forms then we will have to go through
many evolutions before being reborn again into this world. It's
not a question of what kinda' world your children will be born into...
Its a question of what kinda' world will you be born into again.
(*)
|
131.29 | ...Except For Spoinsports | 24579::KALLIS | | Fri Aug 01 1986 12:38 | 12 |
| Re .28:
>I would like to add very quickly that we cannot destroy the world...
Unless we _really_ put our mind to it. I imagine if we were
sufficiently serious about it, we could come up with a technological
widgit that could vaporize the planet.
Steve Kallis, Jr
(who has a few ideas how is might be done, but who's unwilling to
share them)
|
131.30 | The New Age | FDCV13::PAINTER | | Thu Jul 30 1987 16:17 | 16 |
|
To everyone - it might be a good time to go back and read .19 in
this particular note topic. Thanks, Bill, for pointing it out to
me, being a relative newcomer to the conference.
It all fits.
M.Scott Peck writes this exact same message in "The Different Drum",
and in addition, offers some possible alternatives and solutions
to the problem (within the framework of the U.S. Government and
the Christian Church in the US).
The message is the same, it is just the method/medium of delivery
which is different....coupled with the timing, of course.
Cindy
|
131.31 | | NONODE::JOLLIMORE | | Fri Jul 31 1987 08:35 | 2 |
| Thanks Cindy, Thank you Bill.
Jay
|
131.32 | Just because you're paranoid... | NEXUS::MORGAN | Human Reality Engineering, Inc. | Wed Apr 20 1988 03:31 | 29 |
| ...doesnt' mean they're not out to get you. B^)
Associated Press, April 15th
LONDON (AP) -- Witchcraft is sweeping Britain and must be
outlawed so British children don't fall into the "sordid, sexual
and diabolical grasp" of those who practice it, a lawmaker told
the House of Commons.
Geoffrey Dickens, of the governing Conservative Party,
asserted Thursday that many people convicted of child abuse had
been involved in witchcraft initiation ceremonies.
"People laughed when I spoke nine years ago about child abuse.
Most people are listening now," said Dickens, asking for a debate
on the subject. "I now warn the House -- witchcraft is sweeping
the country."
His comments were met with laughter from other lawmakers.
House leader John Wakeham rejected the call for a debate but
urged Dickens to pursue the subjects he thought important.
Later, Dickens said he would urge the introduction of
legislation banning witchcraft, with prison sentences for
offenders.
"These are extremely devious, evil people," he said. "If we
are to protect children from their sordid, sexual and diabolical
grasp we must bring in new laws to wipe witches off the face of
the earth."
He said he had evidence that a vicar in northern England had
surveyed 300 14-year-old pupils, and 87 percent had said they had
dabbled in the occult.
"I have not gone mad," he said. "This is a serious and growing
problem which must be exorcised." [sic]
|
131.33 | | NEXUS::MORGAN | Human Reality Engineering, Inc. | Wed Apr 20 1988 03:33 | 3 |
| Reply to .32,
Sounds like the Wolf is crying "Sheep! Sheep!"
|