T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
8.1 | | SNICKR::FIELD | | Thu Sep 26 1985 09:33 | 21 |
| OUIJA WHAMO!
I knew some people who were very much into the occult frame of
mind who viewed use of a ouija board as very dangerous. They claimed
that when one does use a ouija board he becomes a channel from the 4th
plane of existense to the 3rd plane (here). The 4th plane is where you
go from here when you die and you either recide there or get recycled
as in reincarnation to do some more time on the 3rd plane. Well the danger,
as they claim, is in the fact that you are opening the door to bad or ignorant
spirits (i avoid saying evil because they believe there is no evil). These
spirits will use you to their ends and could care less if they hurt you along
the way. They claim a group of high school students in this area did it a
few years back and suffered injury and one suicide because of it. In a series
of books by Jane Roberts called "Seth" she has daily contact with a personality
called Seth from the 4th plane. She doesn't need a ouija board anymore to
simply become Seth. But that is how Seth originally got in.
Take it for what it's worth!
From the 3rd plane!
Jorge'
|
8.2 | | PEN::KALLIS | | Thu Sep 26 1985 10:09 | 30 |
| There are three (not entirely mutually exclusive) theories of OIUJA oper-
ation [by the way, you might be interested in knowing that the name, which has
an oriental flavor, is really a cojoining of the French and German words for
"yes":, "oui" and "ja"]: One Jorge' has more or less outlined -- that there
are spirits from "the beyond" who inflyence the pointer. A second is that
there are discarnate entities, some benign and others malign, that masquerade as
spirits (this ties in with the Medieval notion of obsession) and motivate the
pointer. The third is that the subconscious minds of the participants force
the answers.
With regards to explanation one, this hypothesis makes the board a
chancy thing to play with, for the reasons stated above. The second hypothe-
sis makes the board a _very_ dangrous thing to play with, particularly if
one or more of the participants has what occultists call The Talent (e.i.,
the ability actively to manipulate occult forces rather than just being sen-
sitive to them; such peple are said to be in the minority), since they can
open an _unprotected_ channel to a malign plane. The third hypothesis also
shows the board to be potentially risky, though nowhere near what explana-
tions one and two, because if some people believe internal thoughts and
opinions to be external-factual, they might make horrible mistakes.
In the 1950s, a book and spinoffs caused a lot of damage. The book
was called _The Search for Bridey Murphy_, and concerned a "researcher's"
"proof" in reincarnation. The book was later shown to be ... well, at best
a mistake and at worst a hoax, but in neither case actually factual. Yet
because of the excitement it generated, at least one teenager committed
suicide so he or she (I forget which) could see what the next incarnation
might be like.
The message, anent hypothesis three, should be evident.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
8.3 | | FURILO::STANLEY | | Thu Sep 26 1985 10:20 | 19 |
| About five years ago I got into the OUIJA board with my wife and sister-in-
law. My sister-in-law (Kristine) had been fiddling with it for several years
prior to that. She told us that she regularly spoke to someone by the name
of Nick. He was quite mean and had been alive until the 1940s. As soon as
we tried it, Nick immediately announced himself. He had told Kristine a
year or so before that he had committed several crimes while he was alive.
To test the validity of the board, my wife (Linda) and I asked some questions
without Kristine's hand on the cursor. We found out that he had committed
rape and murder several times and he thought it was funny. Kristine verified
that this is what he had told her. It was quite creepy.
Another thing that bothered me about it was that Nick didn't like me and
was angered by any questions I posed. He swore violently (the cursor moved
rapidly) and he threatened to kill me. I don't know much about the 4th plane,
but it makes sense from my experience with the OUIJA board.
BTW I don't play with the OUIJA board anymore.
Dave
|
8.4 | | SNICKR::FIELD | | Thu Sep 26 1985 11:10 | 23 |
| I'd like to add a little fuel to the fire of it being an unwise thing
to mess with a ouija board. The spirits on the 4th plane most likely to try
a contact with the 3rd plane are the ones that either can't make it on the 4th
plane or have unfinished business here. The ones that can't make it on the 4th
plane have not lived their lives on the 3rd plane in such a manner as to earn
the permenant 4th plane existence. So they have to incarnate back to the 3rd
plane to try it again. It only makes sence that these individuals most likely
have been led astray and are most likely criminal in nature. The entities
that have unfinished business here usually are consumed with guilt becuase of
something they did here. Any person consumed with guilt is dangerous and
irrational on any plane.
In the case with "Seth" he claims he is a permenant 4th-5th plane
entity who is a teacher by nature on all planes. His perpose was to enlighten
us all thru Jane Rroberts as to the true nature of reality and history. Some
of his stories as to historic personalities, events, and the future are very
interesting. He doesn't claim to tell the future but he does point to the
most probable futures. He does say that you can't predict the future but
hopefully you can have some control over the present as to stear us into the
future. "Free-Will" still lives.
Just PLANE me!
Jorge'
|
8.5 | | PEN::KALLIS | | Thu Sep 26 1985 14:44 | 27 |
| Re .4:
The "Fourth Plane" concept is a model, generally put forth by some mystic
schools that are based on a particular (Eastern-derived) form of theology.
Not everybody agrees that this is an appropriate model. See, for instance,
Qabbalah, which posits an entirely different metastructure.
However, if we accept the idea of additional continuua ("planes"), and if we
assume they are inhabited; particularly if we assume (per above) that the
inhabitants are for the most part nonbenificent, then I'd suspect that such
beings wouldn't necessarily be telling us the truth.
For those interested in the "Seth" phenomenon, I'd suggest another book,
_Conjuring Up Philip_, wherein a group "created" a personality collectively,
outlining "his" life, characteristics, etc., and then successfully "raised"
the "spirit" in a seance.
As humorous neopagan publication pointed out, "Never conjure up Anything
you can't dismiss." Meant jocularly, but there's truth in it.
My personal feeling is that a Ouija board, a planchette, or anything else
designed to open the wielder up to another being is very dangerous to fool
around with; less so if you have the training/discipline to know what to
do and what to look out for, but nothing to "play"with as entertainment, even
for experts.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
8.6 | Jamming the reception | NATASH::BUTCHART | | Wed May 07 1986 12:05 | 30 |
| My own experiences with the Ouija board are minimal, but one was
quite interesting. It concerns the man I was going with in high
school, who is now my husband. When we played with Ouija boards
in high school, they "went dead" whenever he was in the room. I
noticed that if he would wander off into the kitchen or wherever,
the planchette would move for the participants, but when he would
return to watch the action over someone's shoulder, there wouldn't
be any (action, that is).
I'm pretty sure this was not operating from power of suggestion
because for the longest time I didn't tell anyone what was going
on. Finally I told him; intrigued, he and I would repeat the
experiment without telling anyone. We finally did mention this
interesting coincidence to our friends, and after that they would
instruct him to leave the room if they wanted the board to "talk",
although a few times, they sprung his "power" on people who didn't
know about it, just to see if it would work. It always did.
Explanations? Theories? If it was the power of suggestion working,
in the beginning it was only my suggestion, which makes me a whale
of a silent suggester. I've never noticed that I could influence
anyone's minds without saying something first. If it was coincidence,
(always possible) it sure behaved consistently. And finally, if
one assumes The Talent, and psychic sensitivity in particular, it
is possible that some have a Talent for jamming the ether, or being
a psychic short circuiter.
Interesting . . .
Marcia
|
8.7 | Calling All Psis ... Anybody There? | INK::KALLIS | | Wed May 07 1986 12:19 | 24 |
| re .7:
Isaac Bonewits in his book on magic suggested precisely that there
were what he called "anti-psi" people who would act as the equivalent
of psychic jammers or short-circuiters. This might be a case of
it.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
P.S.: There's a story about someone who was putting on a psychic
exhibition back in the 1930s who one evening was having _no_ luck
whatsoever in doing her normal routine.
"I just can't do it," she said.
"_Now_ you'll be able to," said one of the observer, and left.
After his departure, she had no more trouble.
[Sorry I can't be a bit more specific; I heard the story more than
25 years ago.]
-S
|
8.8 | Jammers, cont'd | NATASH::BUTCHART | | Wed May 07 1986 13:33 | 14 |
| It's also interesting to speculate on just what is getting jammed.
Steve K. put forth 3 theories of Ouija board operation, two of which
posited that the planchette was moved by Otherworldly types, the
last which said that it was moved by the subconsciouses of the players.
If my husband is indeed a jammer, I wonder what he's jamming--the
entry of other entities, or other people's own subconscious mental
activity? (which might include any telepathic, clairvoyant or other
"interpersonal" talents?) On the other hand, a person's ability
to contact discarnate entities might be called an interpersonal
talent (of sorts) and without the proper "receiver" the interested
entity can't make contact.
Marcia
|
8.9 | Hidden energy? | FRSBEE::HIGGINS | | Thu May 22 1986 12:02 | 20 |
|
I had an experience about 5 years ago on Christmas eve using a Ouija
board. We used an inverted wine glass because it flowed smoother
on the surface. After 6 or 7 people used it we had everyone put
their fingers on the glass to attempt to lift it off the table.
To everyones surprise the glass rose about 6 inches off the board
for between 3 to 5 seconds. Since most of us had a few drinks in
us there were numerous explainations as to what happened including
one person saying that they had lifted the glass as a joke. I think
this was done because we are brought up believing that these sort
of things just don't happen so we pretend that it didn't. Further
attempts at lifting the glass resulted only in the glass rocking
in a circle and then tipping over. To this day some of the people
involved still discredit what happened-so people won't think they're
crazy? I often wonder why it happened on Christmas eve and may try
it again next Christmas. I think that we needed the energy of more
than two people to do it and that's why we couldn't duplicate what
happened with just two. Anyone else experienced a similar happening?
Mark
|
8.10 | Just browsing on a quiet saturday night | TLE::BRETT | | Sat Jun 21 1986 23:09 | 7 |
|
Sticky fingers...
/Bevin
[A confirmed cynic]
|
8.11 | | HOMBRE::WILLIAMS | | Wed Jun 25 1986 14:57 | 26 |
| I had an experience with Ouija a few years back and just for
entertainment I'll mention it.
I friend of mine and I got discussing Ouija one afternoon and decided
to get it out and see what we could get out of it. We asked standard
questions like "Will I earn alot of money?" and "When will I meet 'that
special girl'" and what not. After a few questions like this that got
answered simply "No" or just "N", the "spirit" seemed to get quite
irriated and spelled out "I no do future" or some broken phrase to that
effect. Needless to say, we were quite excited by that and we both
immediatley accused the other of horsing around. Intrigued, we
continued and found out that the "spirit" was a Russian immigrant - I
can't rememeber if he gave a name - who had been killed in an
automobile accident in the early forties. After a while of "talking" to
him, we started asking more personal questions (like "what's it like to
be dead?" and were you married, did you have children?" We were going
to try and find evidence of his actual existance) and he broke things
off and we couldn't get any movement any more. A few weeks later we
tried again and he said something to the effect of "I can't talk - too
sad"!
When it came right down to it, we didn't find out anything about
"him", which makes the skeptic in me say that my friend was pushing
the board. But, who knows?
lowell
|
8.12 | Another true-life Ouija experience | WOMBAT::FELDMAN | | Thu Jun 26 1986 17:38 | 52 |
| In talking about the Ouija, let's keep in mind that the "standard"
board is a gamed marketed by Parker Brothers. However, one need
not have the Ouija Board to get results. One book I read described
a number of experiences which were the result of writing the alphabet
and numbers on a bar-room table and using a whiskey glass as a
planchette.
I have only had one experience, many years ago. I was visiting
my parents house and my mother and a cousin (on my father's side)
went off to use a Ouija Board. I was quite cynical and followed
to observe the antics. Nothing exciting happened for a while, but
then a confused series of messages began to appear. Suddenly, I
was convinced that someone else was in the room. I looked around,
but there was no one else. However, the feeling that someone had
entered the room was very very strong. I also was positive that
I knew who it was. I said nothing. I only told my cousin to ask
if it wanted me to sit down at the board. The immediate reply was
yes. Now my thought was that it presence wanted the two people
at the board to be blood relations; since my mother was there, it
would seem that I should have replaced my cousin. However, I asked
my mother to get up, and shared the planchette with my cousin.
She then asked who the presence was and the planchette immediately
pointed out my Father's mother's name - our shared grandmother.
This confirmed my earlier feeling that I knew who was in the room
- my paternal grandmother.
During the exercise, I deliberately kept my eyes off of the board
- as did my cousin. Our eyes were locked on each other. From the
experession on her face she was as surprised as I was at what was
going on. My mother read the letters off as they came
up. As far as I can tell, neither my cousin nor myself was exerting
any influence over the direction the planchette moved. In fact,
on the few times I tried, I had no problem changing the direction
of motion; however, it never came to rest until it wanted to.
Was I scared. YES! All three of us KNEW that someone was in the
room. My cousin and I now share a special feeling for each other
that we never had (we were never that close - she's a few years
older than me), and none of us have ever touched Ouija again.
I have related this experience to other people with more knowledge
in psychic and occult phenomena and have been warned NOT to fool
around with the board.
One man's experience. Take it for what it's worth.
As for Jane Robert's and Seth, I have read the first two Seth books
and would welcome a discussion of Seth theory of reality and
personality.
Ben
|
8.13 | -< messages from beyond >- | HITECH::BUCK | | Thu Sep 11 1986 15:58 | 37 |
| I've had several prophetic of accurate Ouija exp's.
1. Once I was on a double-date with a guy, Noah, just up from Boston,
my friend Bob, and his girlfriend, Barbara Potter. Well, Noah and
I both knew Bob, but we didn't know each other or Barbara, so conversa-
tion was a bit awkward, so I asked if anyone wanted to Ouija, and
Noah gave me a lift to my house to get it.
I always first as I there is a message for anyone in the room
(after a proper "hello"), and it immediately spelled out, "Barbara,
tell mother to marry again." Her father had died one year ago that
day (for coincidences). Next, "B. Quit you job." --she was a
kindergarten teacher and wasn't happy with it. Barbara then asked
us to ask it questions that she knew the answers to, ie. "What frat.
were you the Pres. of?" It said, "Sig Ep." --which was the one
her father had been Pres. of when he was at Dartmouth. The list
goes on but I don't want to get too long-winded.
Anyway, the popular concensus of those in the room during this
occurance was that it was Barbara Potters father. --Oh yes, like
one of the former observances, when Bob (Barbaras date) tried to
do it with me the planchette went wild and was swearing like a
sailor. I guess he didn't approve of Bob going out with his daughter.
2. My girlfriend was preg. and we asked girl or boy.
It said boy died girl. Turns out that when she must have miscarried
during her 2nd or 3rd month cause when she went in for her 6-mo.
check-up the doc said "you're only 3 mo. preggers." At the end
of a year of being pregnant she had a girl.
3. Danger of Sebago Lake was the message, so I warned my father
not to go out in his boat that day, but he doesn't give ANY credence
to Ouija boards or anything extra-normal, so he went anyway, and
sure enough he hit rock and had a wicked leak in his boat -- call
the reverse bucket brigade!! --
G O O D B Y E --Janice
|
8.14 | Spirit lives on many different "levels" | AKOV68::FRETTS | | Fri Oct 24 1986 17:57 | 42 |
| There are a couple of references in this note to the 4th dimension
or astral plane. I just want to pass along one of many possible
structures to the planes that we exist on. The one I have been
taught is as follows:
1 - physical (+ etheric)
2 - astral (emotional)
3 - lower causal (mental)
4 - higher causal (mental)
5 - spiritual (buddhic)
6 - monadic (christ)
7 - divine
When our physical body dies, we then experience in our astral bodies
on the astral plane. This experience can last for different lengths
of time. Some spirits can get stuck on this plane and never move
on, however they do not reincarnate from this plane. A "normal"
process would be to spend some time in the astral plane and continue
the process that we were working on here. At a certain point, we
experience death of the astral body and then are in the mental body.
We also experience the death of this body and return to our higher
mental body which can be considered our higher self. As long as
we need to reincarnate and have physical experience, we use the
causal body to recreate the three "lower" level bodies for each
incarnation. While we are in physical form, there is a part of
us that exists on all these
When we are in communication with spirits, they are usually on the
astral plane. It is important to have some guidance and discipline
when opening ourselves up to this plane because we create a "light" on
the astral plane that spirits are attracted to.
There are also those spirits that dwell on the "higher" planes,
and these are usually our guides or teachers, or "guardian angels".
Some have been with us for many lifetimes, others may be with us
only a short time, depending on our needs.
It's quite a fascinating area of study, and one of which we will
always have something to learn about.
Carole
|
8.15 | RE 8.14 | EDEN::KLAES | Singing Pumpkin carols! | Fri Oct 31 1986 13:39 | 11 |
| I found your explanations very interesting, and your comment
about guardian angels ties in with the Roman Catholic belief of
guardian angels "assigned" to watch over everyone.
What I would like to know is WHERE did such information come
from? I am not asking what reference books did you get this from,
I would like to know the original source of these concepts, and
where and how did they learn (or make up?) such things.
Larry
|
8.16 | Spirit authors | AKOV68::FRETTS | | Fri Oct 31 1986 16:16 | 18 |
| Re: .15
This information was passed to me through a teacher who is also
a minister and an evidential medium. He has put together some
very interesting classes dealing with spirit and the subtle
bodies. His source (though not limited to) are the works of
Alice Bailey. She was a medium whose spirit teacher The Tibetan
wrote many books using her as his instrument. It is from his
teachings and the teachings of others in the spirit realms that
this information comes to be. What spirit bases this teaching
on I don't know.
Alice Bailey, I believe, was a Theosophist.
Carole
P.S. I was wondering if anyone was going to read my note response!
|
8.17 | RE 8.16 | EDEN::KLAES | Welcome to Olympus, Captain Kirk! | Mon Nov 03 1986 10:36 | 4 |
| What is a Theosophist?
Larry
|
8.18 | Theosophy | AKOV68::FRETTS | | Thu Nov 06 1986 08:58 | 26 |
| re: .17
I wanted to make sure I had the definition of Theosophy correct
before answering your question, so I verified it with the
Theosophical Society in Boston. Here goes:
Theosophy embodies three objects. They are:
. Belief in a universal spirit, and working toward forming
a nucleus of a brotherhood of humanity.
. Members are encouraged to study all world comparative religions,
world philosophies, and world science.
. Exploring the laws of nature and the cosmos, as well as the
emerging powers of human beings as spiritual entities.
(Madame) H. P. Blavatsky is considered the founder of the Theosophical
Society. They also have a very good book shop on the premises (Quest
Books), and sponsor lectures and workshops on a regular basis.
Hope this helps.
Regards, Carole
|
8.19 | RE 8.18 | EDEN::KLAES | Welcome to Olympus, Captain Kirk! | Thu Nov 06 1986 09:06 | 7 |
| Yes, thank you.
I'm sure it also helped those who were also unfamiliar with
Theosophy.
Larry
|
8.20 | Who was at the board? | ORION::DONAHUE | Peter 1-2658 | Tue Nov 18 1986 13:08 | 6 |
| re: .13
Janice, concerning 1., who was at the board when the information
about Barbara was spelled out?
peter
|
8.21 | MAKING CONTACT | NEWVAX::FALCO | Love means nothing to a tennis player | Thu Nov 20 1986 00:24 | 35 |
|
RE .18
Are you a member of the Theosophical Society? Is there one in/near
Washington, D.C.? I would be interested in finding people in the area
who share an interest in the works of H.P. Blavatsky or A. A. Bailey. I
came across some of Bailey's books many years ago, but you are the first
person who has ever mentioned her works. I feel like I've just bumped
into an old friend.
As to Ouija boards, my thought is that they serve no useful purpose, but
serve largely destructive ends. (who's ends is another question). My
suggestion for people who might choose the board to contact deceased relatives,
or for insight/personal advice is to use meditation, prayer or lucid
dreaming.
I had a friend who died the summer after high school graduation. Some time
after that I began to see her in my dreams. This continued over the course
of months, at first, so I began to take note and decided to communicate with
her in my dreams. She was surrounded with much negativity at first, but over
the course of several years, she changed. It is very difficult to describe
in words, and this is the only time I have ever said much about it, but I
believe that I was communicating with another spirit, which I knew, and was
able to help her in some way to move closer to the Path.
The reason I should mention this now, is not without cause. I earlier
read a note/replies on lucid dreaming, and another on Ouija boards and
contacting loved ones on the other side. Additionally, though I've read
this notesfile infrequently, this is the first I have contributed. I was
waiting for something to click. I saw tonight a need to make contact.
Regards,
Pat
|
8.22 | Welcome | AKOV68::FRETTS | | Thu Nov 20 1986 16:36 | 28 |
| re: .21
Hello and welcome.
I'm not a member of the Theosophical Society, though I've attended
some lectures there. As I mentioned in my previous note, a teacher
whose classes I have attended bases much of his material on Alice
Bailey's work, as well as C. Leadbeater (sp?). I have read a couple
of Bailey's books - they are so full of information and some of
the concepts are so different that it takes me a long, long time
to finish a book. Being an astrology student, the one I'm fascinated
with is her work on Esoteric Astrology - still have not finished
this one!
I don't know if there are chapters of the T. Society in the D.C.
area. You might try calling the Boston society, I'm sure they
would be more than willing to talk with you. They are located at:
Theosophical Society
122 Bay State Road
Boston, MA 02116
617-266-0410
Again, welcome and I look forward to hearing from you again.
Regards, Carole
|
8.23 | re. 20 -- peter | TPLVAX::FOX | | Mon Dec 01 1986 14:08 | 13 |
| peter,
Noel (my blind date from Boston) and I were at the ouija while
Barbara and Bob sat on the couch just watching -- neither Noel
or I had met Barbara before, but we both knew Bob -- also, it
was a spontaneous idea to play with the oiuja brd. (mine), so
that information was either esp or spirit influenced or a dam-
good guess(s)
why, have you had any uncanny exp.'s with the weegee?
janice
|
8.24 | re. 23 -- Janice | ORION::DONAHUE | Peter 1-2658 | Tue Dec 23 1986 14:51 | 12 |
| re: .23
If Barbara had been at the board, I'd say she could be influencing
the movements of the planchette. But because she was watching, and
because she was a stranger to you and Noel, it was a very
interesting situation.
My theory of the Ouija is that it's a neuromuscular phenomenon of
some sort rather than a connection to a spirit world. But your story
has certainly made me think!
peter
|
8.25 | ouija operation theory | BAXTA::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Wed Jan 28 1987 04:31 | 16 |
|
I believe the ouija board operates by pcyshic energy and that there
is a field of energy around the person or persons using it.Some
observations i have made:
1.The last time we used the board my girlfriend Diane tried
it by herself.It worked but moved slowly.I noticed if i touched
her or came too close to the board it would stop moving and start
again when i moved away.I believe i was interupting the field.
2.If i joined her on the board the pointer moved a lot faster.
I believe our energy combined at that point.
3.I notice that the more positive we are when we use the
board that the pointer moves much faster.I believe positive thoughts
and manner increases our energy level thereby allowing better operation
of the board.
MIKE
|
8.26 | Moving right along ... | INK::KALLIS | Hallowe'en should be legal holiday | Tue Mar 10 1987 09:43 | 4 |
| This conversation is continued in note 242
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
8.27 | <"Believe it or not"> | EDSVAX::MAKO | | Fri Mar 27 1987 16:38 | 19 |
| Here is a strange experience that happened to me. I still do not
know what to think of it. Maybe some of you would be interested.
...When I was around twelve years old, four of my cousins and I
were playing with the Ouija board on the ice on an old Cranberry
bog (my Aunt Butchie would give us a lickin' if we got caught in
the house with it). Well, we got some guy who was a real sarcastic
person (ghost, spirit....). He said some things that sounded sort
of creepy. Said alot of sadistic things about "little boys". At
the time, we truly did not understand what he was telling us. Soon
he became annoyed with us and said "do not wish to speak" we still
continued to talk and ask him questions. The board went nutso and
the ice cracked under us so badly that we had to run leaving the
board behind us. For a very long time after that we all had dreams
of a "bad man". To say the least I am horrified by the Ouija board.
Please comment
Samantha
|
8.28 | I believe it. | PBSVAX::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Sat Mar 28 1987 17:21 | 14 |
| RE: .27
You were obviously tapping into some personality, whether external
or subconscious or (I don't think that we've mentioned this one
before) arising by conventional or paranormal means from the "group
dynamic", which was dominated by hatred and the desire to create
fear. Being able to "handle" such a personality (i.e., being able
to avoid psychological harm from contact with one) is one of the
necessary prerequisites for undertaking any form of "channeling"
experience. Children are emphatically *not* ready to deal with
this. Many adults who are attracted to this activity are not either.
It is not a question of maturity but of a type of sensitivity.
Topher
|
8.29 | " ******** are Evenly Distributed " | CURIE::COSTLEY | | Mon Jun 22 1987 15:47 | 13 |
| I've never had the simple persistence to work the OUIJA board as
a character-by-character data-xfr device. It certainly has been
'poisoned' by its representation in popular films, etc. as the
prankish device-of-choice of charlatans. It seems to me that it
is no more inherently evil than a telegram note-pad. It's just
who's sending the messages that might cause some concern. My S/O
always observes" "Assholes are evenly distributed" (here & There)
as a simply deflationary caution. Why must They be better than Us?
They Are us! just a mite deferred; some are itching to stay connected,
& some are working off karmic debts (as a previous note described).
As ever, the 'management of expectations' is a preliminary stage.
- Boleslaw
|
8.30 | Confused?! | CURIE::DECARTERET | | Wed Jul 01 1987 00:50 | 6 |
| On and Ouija board, how does the thing move? Does it just move
by itself while you watch it or do you get signals where to move
it. Is it really true that it is dangerous to use an Ouiga board
if your unexperianced. If so, why is it that it is sold as a kids
game, like monopoly?
-=*>Jason<*=-
|
8.31 | have you read from the base note forward? | ERASER::KALLIS | Hallowe'en should be legal holiday | Wed Jul 01 1987 08:47 | 19 |
| The usual technique is that the participants placce their hands
on the planchette. Motion might be caused by some entity working
through the person or people participing, currently being called
"channeling," these days, or it might be the unconscious prompting
of one of the participants. Either way, contact is required [except
in Hollywood films :-)]. Using a Ouija board _can_ be dangerous
(do a dir/title=ouija to check all the notes on ouija experiences),
though with proper controls, it needn't be.
> ... If so, why is it that it is sold as a kids
>game, like monopoly?
Because:
1) there's money in it, and,
2) the manufacturers apparently don't see it as something to be
taken seriously.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
8.32 | | VIDEO::MORRISSEY | I'm a Nightstalker... | Wed Jul 01 1987 17:23 | 26 |
|
I haven't had much experience with a Ouija board but I did have
one that just came into light.
My brother, a nextdoor neighbor and myself used a Ouija board
one evening, just around dusk. We asked if there was a spirit present
and it replied with a yes and then we asked who it was. All we
got was a "DR" and then my dog jumped on the door so contact was
destroyed and could not get it back.
At the time I thought it was my brother or Dina (my neighbor)
trying to be funny and pushing it with their fingers (they were
14 and 13 at the time). This all happened about a year and a half
ago.
Well, just this past weekend, we had a yard sale at my house.
One of our 'customers' said his mother used to live up the street
from us and mentioned that a Dr. Colby may have lived in our house.
Could the "DR" that the spirit mentioned been the beginning of trying
to spell out Dr. Colby??
Just seems weird. I haven't had a chance to do research
on the house but I think now maybe I will.
Judy
|
8.33 | Another Ouija Experience | GRECO::MISTOVICH | | Mon Jul 06 1987 14:08 | 26 |
8.34 | Another Ouija Board Experience | PNEUMA::MCNALLY | | Fri Jul 24 1987 14:52 | 21 |
| I myself never had an experience with an Ouija Board... but ...
a friend of my sisters did... She had just started dating this guy
and he had brought her over to a friend house. They were sort of
bored and one of the girls decided to mess around with the Ouija
Board. Well, they came in contact with some spirit by the name of
Joe. The asked him how old he was when he died and he said 13.
They asked him how he died and the board spelled out "Mommy did
it"... My sisters friend thought that it was corny, so they tried
it again and came in contact with another guy who died at age 30.
They then asked how he died and the board spelled out murder. When
one of the guys started talking to it, the spirit must have got
mad and started spelling out all sorts of swears and then the board
spelled out "K-I-L-L". They asked who he wanted to kill and the
board spelled out my sisters friends last name... None of the people
there knew her last name except for her date who was in the other
room at the time... Well, he took the board and threw it across
the room and told them never to take it out again in front of him.
She was a little upset about it, but she says that she will never
fool around with it again. As they say, "YOU SHOULD NEVER FOOL AROUND
WITH THE UNKNOWN"..
|
8.35 | my experience with Ouija | LEZAH::BOBBITT | face piles of trials with smiles | Fri Jul 24 1987 15:17 | 13 |
| I'm not sure how much of this was real, or imagined, but there were
probably 4-7 people using our Ouija board several times a week when
I was around 12 or so. The "spirit" of the board was named Tarjos.
He seemed Indian, and was nice. There were "fun spirits" named
Rusty and Dusty, and a nice young female named Sarah, who was always
being hassled (punished) by an evil female spirit named Hester.
One of the more powerful spirits to visit us was Jade. He first
made the candle flicker green, when asked for proof that he was
there (never do this, folks, it may be BAD)....and then we all thought
we saw his outline on the wall. Maybe overactive imaginations.
But I don't fool with the stuff anymore.
|
8.36 | Any interest still out there? | HOGAN::KIMMEL | | Thu Feb 11 1988 08:53 | 27 |
| Well, it seems this conference has "died", but maybe I can get it
goinh again. I don't use the WeeGee, but I do what that call "Walking
the Table". (Or Rapping the table). It's the same principle as the
WeeGee, but you use a four legged, wooden table, and it "raps" by
bumping up and down. Three raps for yes, two for no, and it will
"rap" out letters by counting the raps ans eaqating the letter of
the alphabet.
I "inheireted" this trait from my maternal grandmother who could
do this and automatic writings. I don't really know if I "contact"
other entities, or my sub-conscience is linking into others, or
it's just my sub-consicence. As this has been a long-statnding
phenomena in my family, we all accept it, not as fact, but as fun.
I won't "walk the table" in front of anyone who takes it too seriously,
as I don't know what is really going on. We just have a lot of fun
with it, and have had some "predections" come true. I've also
"converted" a few skeptics because of the "knowledge" of things
I was able to relate.
I am personally on a "search", but it doesn't dominate my life.
I've had quite a few "wierd" experiences myself, but don't try to
turn them into proof of anything.
Well, can we start these discussions again?
Earph (nickname given to me by a Haunted
House Hunter - he found 2 he could never explain)
|
8.37 | Actually, its frequently discussed. | PBSVAX::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Thu Feb 11 1988 13:50 | 193 |
| RE: .36
Fear not, although topic 8 has not been that active, the topic of
Ouija boards has been a frequent topic of discussion (One might
even say it has been rather "topical", though you might perfer not
to :-).
Below you will find a directory of all notes containing the word
"Ouija" assembled with the aid of the ENOTE batch NOTE program.
Several limitations of this listing to keep in mind:
1) ENOTE lists the topic note in the directory whenever a
reply contains the word searched for.
2) Many mentions may be completely trivial.
3) Notes which talk about Ouija or are relevant to Ouija may
not explicitly use the name. For example, your note does
not appear since in your only reference you spelled it
phonetically.
4) I made this listing mostly to show that the topic is hot,
and to allow people to look at a few notes whose title may
be intriguing. If you want to just look for all (or almost
all) notes containing the word OUIJA, you're better off
using the NOTES SEARCH command (Say HELP SEARCH), or the
ENOTES EXTRACT command with the /CONTAINS qualifier.
Topher
_______________________________________________________________________________
$ ENOTE DIR/CONTAINS=OUIJA DEJAVU *.*
Listing notes from DEJAVU (conference DMATE2::DEJAVU)...
<<< DMATE2::DUA0:[NOTES$LIBRARY]DEJAVU.NOTE;1 >>>
Psychic Phenomena
Created: 22-JAN-1986 14:01 653 topics Updated: 11-FEB-1988 12:01
-< Know more new notes (643 is just FYI) >-
Topic Author Date Repl Title
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 DR::BLINN 25-SEP-1985 36 Ouija boards
SNICKR::FIELD 26-SEP-1985 8.1
FURILO::STANLEY 26-SEP-1985 8.3
SNICKR::FIELD 26-SEP-1985 8.4
PEN::KALLIS 26-SEP-1985 8.5
NATASH::BUTCHART 7-MAY-1986 8.6 Jamming the reception
NATASH::BUTCHART 7-MAY-1986 8.8 Jammers, cont'd
FRSBEE::HIGGINS 22-MAY-1986 8.9 Hidden energy?
HOMBRE::WILLIAMS 25-JUN-1986 8.11
WOMBAT::FELDMAN 26-JUN-1986 8.12 Another true-life Ouija experience
HITECH::BUCK 11-SEP-1986 8.13 -< messages from beyond >-
NEWVAX::FALCO 20-NOV-1986 8.21 MAKING CONTACT
TPLVAX::FOX 1-DEC-1986 8.23 re. 20 -- peter
ORION::DONAHUE 23-DEC-1986 8.24 re. 23 -- Janice
BAXTA::PUSHARD_MIKE 28-JAN-1987 8.25 ouija operation theory
EDSVAX::MAKO 27-MAR-1987 8.27 <"Believe it or not">
CURIE::COSTLEY 22-JUN-1987 8.29 " ******** are Evenly Distributed "
CURIE::DECARTERET 30-JUN-1987 8.30 Confused?!
ERASER::KALLIS 1-JUL-1987 8.31 have you read from the base note forward?
VIDEO::MORRISSEY 1-JUL-1987 8.32
GRECO::MISTOVICH 6-JUL-1987 8.33 Another Ouija Experience
PNEUMA::MCNALLY 24-JUL-1987 8.34 Another Ouija Board Experience
LEZAH::BOBBITT 24-JUL-1987 8.35 my experience with Ouija
14 MOTHER::PHILPOTT 2-OCT-1985 39 detecting a presence.
VIDEO::MORRISSEY 1-JUL-1987 14.31
INK::KALLIS 1-JUL-1987 14.32 details help
VIDEO::MORRISSEY 2-JUL-1987 14.33
16 BELKER::STANLEY 5-OCT-1985 180 Who are you?
FREMEN::WMSON 7-OCT-1985 16.5
OEDPUS::PHILPOTT 21-OCT-1985 16.19
WFOVX3ESCARCIDA 17-DEC-1985 16.29
ATFAB::VINDICI 8-SEP-1987 16.132 Out on a Limb?
27 23-OCT-1985 323 UFO's
ARCANA::CONNELLY 19-MAY-1987 27.170 less-than-holy communion?
37 LEHIGH::WATSON 6-NOV-1985 12 Personal Experiences Anyone?
CLOUD9::WMSON 21-NOV-1985 37.5
HITECH::BUCK 12-SEP-1986 37.7
52 NEXUS::MORGAN 7-DEC-1985 9 Jane and Bob.
PEN::KALLIS 10-DEC-1985 52.2
121 INK::KALLIS 29-APR-1986 75 The Satan Connection: Watch Out For It!
GRECO::MISTOVICH 20-FEB-1987 121.39 ENOUGH IS ENOUGH
GRECO::MISTOVICH 23-FEB-1987 121.53 WHO'S BEING RIDICULOUS?
127 WFOVX3::ESCARCIDA 5-MAY-1986 34 How about a Gathering?
PBSVAX::COOPER 5-MAY-1986 127.6 GREAT!
150 AKOV03::DALPE 12-JUN-1986 15 Proof?
CSMADM::SAWYER 24-JUN-1986 150.10 final proof...
242 14-NOV-1986 29 ouija board experience
ERLTC::COOPER 14-NOV-1986 242.4 Technique.
INK::KALLIS 18-NOV-1986 242.19 Good Intentiona All Around
INK::KALLIS 10-MAR-1987 242.28
244 MTBLUE::PUSHARD_MIKE 20-NOV-1986 24 lets try again
PSYCHE::DECAROLIS 24-NOV-1986 244.15 y
INK::KALLIS 24-NOV-1986 244.17
ERLTC::COOPER 24-NOV-1986 244.18 Dangers
INK::KALLIS 24-NOV-1986 244.19
BAXTA::PUSHARD_MIKE 25-NOV-1986 244.20 summing it up
INK::KALLIS 25-NOV-1986 244.22
252 INK::KALLIS 1-DEC-1986 8 A Sinister Seance
INK::KALLIS 15-JAN-1987 252.7 Investigate, but do so professionally
275 BPOV09::PERRY 5-JAN-1987 18 Sensitive Animals ?
PBSVAX::COOPER 9-JAN-1987 275.15 To seer or not to seer.
288 TSG::MASON 22-JAN-1987 93 Trance Channeling
PBSVAX::COOPER 24-AUG-1987 288.29 Female Channeled Personalities.
BSS::BLAZEK 18-JAN-1988 288.93 Jap Herron
290 ORION::HERBERT 26-JAN-1987 35 PARANORMAL EXPERIENCES
BEANCT::TEMPSEC 30-JAN-1987 290.6 see-thru lids
316 MTBLUE::PUSHARD_MIKE 25-FEB-1987 77 Mediums/Channelors
MTBLUE::PUSHARD_MIKE 3-MAR-1987 316.9 TO CONTINUE....
319 ORION::HERBERT 27-FEB-1987 15 The shape of things to come?
COLORS::TBAKER 2-MAR-1987 319.4 The lion and the wind
325 AKOV68::FRETTS 3-MAR-1987 21 Afterlife Experiment
MTBLUE::PUSHARD_MIKE 5-MAR-1987 325.16 the search for...
329 MLFS1::DALPE 9-MAR-1987 29 About the warnings
CHUCKL::SSMITH 10-MAR-1987 329.7 Can anyone be more specific?
INK::KALLIS 10-MAR-1987 329.8 But don't do it for frivolous reasons
PBSVAX::COOPER 10-MAR-1987 329.9 Principles (rather than procedures) of safety.
GOJIRA::PHILPOTT 10-MAR-1987 329.12
MRPRD8::PLACEMENT 11-MAR-1987 329.13 Have we gone to far? How far can we go?
ERASER::KALLIS 11-MAR-1987 329.14 The key is _Responsiblity and Knowledge_
ZEKE::LINEHAN 11-MAR-1987 329.16 ***OUIJA BOARD***
VAX4::JOLLY_S 9-JUN-1987 329.17 I'm with Steve, sorta!
332 MTBLUE::PUSHARD_MIKE 13-MAR-1987 3 "WITCHBOARD"
INK::KALLIS 22-JUN-1987 332.3 addendum
358 INK::KALLIS 4-MAY-1987 98 Truth, Faith, and Reality
PUZZLE::GUEST_TMP 29-MAY-1987 358.46 "how can I release this prison door I'm holding?"
368 SKYLRK::CIACI 22-MAY-1987 13 Seth
NEXUS::MORGAN 14-JUL-1987 368.11 Rupert and Joseph
394 SSDEVO::ACKLEY 24-JUN-1987 61 Invisible enemies?
MTBLUE::PUSHARD_MIKE 7-JUL-1987 394.51 Seek out the answer
BIGALO::PUSHARD_MIKE 7-JUL-1987 394.55 invited guests?
401 THE780::MANSFIELD 7-JUL-1987 7 Sahaja Yoga and Realization
MLCSSE::SU 1-DEC-1987 401.7 A Unique Discovery
403 STING::MOREAU 8-JUL-1987 20 Psychics - Be prepared
NATASH::BUTCHART 31-JUL-1987 403.12
406 GRECO::GADDIS 15-JUL-1987 24 Lazaris And Concept:Synergy
BARAKA::BLAZEK 7-DEC-1987 406.18 Or we could...
DECWET::MITCHELL 7-DEC-1987 406.19 A Ouija board with two extra O's...
CLUE::PAINTER 8-DEC-1987 406.22 Going downhill quickly
418 WOWBAG::MARSH 21-JUL-1987 176 August 16-17th
BAXTA::PUSHARD_MIKE 21-JUL-1987 418.6 pieces of the puzzle
421 MORGAN::MOREAU 21-JUL-1987 3 Ouija Boards
USFSHQ::SMANDELL 21-JUL-1987 421.1
433 SKETCH::BASSETT 31-JUL-1987 1 Ouija board question
PBSVAX::COOPER 31-JUL-1987 433.1 Relative danger and performance
443 USRCV1::JEFFERSONL 11-AUG-1987 91 Any demons in the house?
FDCV13::PAINTER 12-AUG-1987 443.21 Further explanation
455 DECWET::MITCHELL 17-AUG-1987 145 What's Wrong with New Age Thinking
PBSVAX::COOPER 26-AUG-1987 455.40 Return to normalcy
DECWET::MITCHELL 26-AUG-1987 455.42 Hardly dangerous
SSDEVO::ACKLEY 27-AUG-1987 455.47 subconscious minds �
DECWET::MITCHELL 19-JAN-1988 455.99 Next I'll be hearing from Shirley Mclain
GENRAL::DANIEL 22-JAN-1988 455.112 Butter is made from milk. The sun's leaking.
476 ATFAB::VINDICI 4-SEP-1987 83 More Ouija
PBSVAX::COOPER 4-SEP-1987 476.4 Misc. Ouija notes.
BARAKA::BLAZEK 8-SEP-1987 476.5 St. Germaine Connection
CSC32::WOLBACH 8-SEP-1987 476.6
BAXTA::PUSHARD_MIKE 9-SEP-1987 476.9 ASKING THE WRONG QUESTIONS
BARAKA::BLAZEK 9-SEP-1987 476.10 Asking The RIGHT Questions
VINO::EVANS 11-SEP-1987 476.16 I wanna know
PBSVAX::COOPER 11-SEP-1987 476.18 Differing traditions, differing practices.
INK::KALLIS 11-SEP-1987 476.19 this old board ...
HPSCAD::DDOUCETTE 11-SEP-1987 476.20 Please elaborate
MTBLUE::PUSHARD_MIKE 14-SEP-1987 476.23 HELLO OUT THERE!
BARAKA::BLAZEK 14-SEP-1987 476.24 'Fess Up Guys
FRSBEE::HIGGINS 15-SEP-1987 476.31 Tidbits
PBSVAX::COOPER 15-SEP-1987 476.33 Rigorous experiments.
BAXTA::PUSHARD_MIKE 17-SEP-1987 476.45 Even more
GERBIL::MORAN 22-SEP-1987 476.52 An open mind
MIST::IVERSON 23-SEP-1987 476.53 "The Board" on reincarnation
BARAKA::BLAZEK 30-SEP-1987 476.57 Help! It's Deep Stuff!
CURIE::TZELLAS 5-OCT-1987 476.78 Help...
BARAKA::BLAZEK 7-OCT-1987 476.80 re: .59, .78, .79
477 ARCANA::CONNELLY 4-SEP-1987 39 What's Wrong with Science-oriented Thinking?
UTRUST::DEHARTOG 25-SEP-1987 477.36
489 DECWET::MITCHELL 16-SEP-1987 32 An Experiment
CHGV04::ORZECH 25-SEP-1987 489.23 This is embarrassing. A grown man...
SSDEVO::YOUNGER 25-SEP-1987 489.24 More threats :^)
DECWET::MITCHELL 25-SEP-1987 489.30 Here they are!
497 STING::MOREAU 23-SEP-1987 16 Pendulums...?
PBSVAX::COOPER 23-SEP-1987 497.6 What you know you know.
499 BARAKA::BLAZEK 24-SEP-1987 16 Ouija Messages
DECWET::MITCHELL 27-JAN-1988 499.9 Temporal problem
38146::STANLEY 28-JAN-1988 499.10
INK::KALLIS 28-JAN-1988 499.11 Quick, Watson!
CLUE::PAINTER 28-JAN-1988 499.12 I just hadda do it.
PSI::CONNELLY 29-JAN-1988 499.13 <groan>
PBSVAX::COOPER 29-JAN-1988 499.15 Like fast hunt and peck.
576 HPSCAD::DDOUCETTE 23-NOV-1987 15 Destiny
AIS11::VINDICI 23-NOV-1987 576.6 Probable Realities
639 CNTROL::GEORGE 28-JAN-1988 4 Has the New Age gone mainstream?
29633::BLAZEK 30-JAN-1988 639.4 Looking for the Light
647 28912::CALLAGHAN 2-FEB-1988 32 What of our own End?
MTAVAX::CHRISTENSEN 3-FEB-1988 647.11 Getting Older
|
8.38 | | 5691::PARE | What a long, strange trip its been | Thu Feb 11 1988 15:36 | 4 |
| re .36
Walking The Table sounds facinating. How does it work and have you
found out any interesting things that you can tell us about?
Mary
|
8.39 | Historical note. | PBSVAX::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Thu Feb 11 1988 16:35 | 17 |
| RE: .36
Table walking is anscestral to the Ouija board. This phenomena
was frequent at seances. Michael Faraday, the great English
experimentalist, placed small boards beneath the sitter hands,
these boards in turn were placed on pieces of slippery waxed paper
which in turn were placed on the table. Faraday showed, by this
device that the table was actually being moved by small, presumably
unconscious, movements of the sitters hands. Undaunted, the
spiritualists adapted and adopted his device to form the planchette
which made automatic writing much easier. This evolved into
the modern Ouija board.
Table walking is also known as table tipping by the way.
Topher
|
8.40 | Confused | BSS::BLAZEK | Dancing with My Self | Sun Feb 21 1988 13:49 | 28 |
| re: .36 (Earph)
>> Three raps for yes, two for no, and it will "rap" out letters
>> by counting the raps ans eaqating the letter of the alphabet.
Doesn't that take quite some time, not to mention unwavering
attention, to get any sort of message through? Was the "two
for no, three for yes" method passed along to you from your
grandmother? Does the table actually lift (however minutely)
off the floor?
>> As this has been a long-statnding phenomena in my family, we
>> all accept it, not as fact, but as fun.
I'm not quite sure I understand why you are doing this if you
don't take it seriously. As has been indicated in many Ouija
stories, people tend to get what they've sought. If you seek
thrills and/or sensationalism you're undoubtedly going to get
it. I would like to offer a peaceful word of caution to you:
Please don't fool around with this in a frivolous matter. I
believe the authenticity of whoever it is you're "contacting"
is minimized and the possibility for less-than-positive exp-
eriences enhanced by any display of frivolity.
Forgive me if I've completely misunderstood your entry!
Carla
|
8.41 | scared stiff | CSCMA::SNOW | | Wed Feb 24 1988 13:48 | 6 |
| I have never messed with one of those boards and never will only
because of my old roommates experience with it. I came home one
day from work and she and one of her friends were messing with one
of the board and then about two weeks later she started getting
these weird letters from Europe..These letters were things about
Satanism, which I could not understand..A month later I moved out.
|
8.42 | Do you know... | SSDEVO::YOUNGER | Calm down, it's only 1's and 0's | Thu Feb 25 1988 23:32 | 9 |
| Re .41:
Did your roomate know the person sending the letters from Europe?
Or were they *really* mysterious letters?
wondering...
Elizabeth
|
8.43 | Please protect yourself | BSS::VANFLEET | | Wed Jun 22 1988 18:21 | 34 |
| As with any dealings in the spirit realm one has to be careful
what one lets into this realm. Ouija boards are merely tools
like Tarot cards, a pen and paper (as in automatic writing) or
the medium (as in channeling). The danger comes when people
"play" with the board allowing any entity to come through. The
best way to begin experiments with the board is attempting to
contact a spirit one is familiar with i.e. a spirit guide,
relative, etc. I always start each session with all the
participants and observers closing their eyes and imagining
surrounding the area in white light. This provides a psychic
protection. It also helps to say a short prayer to the effect
that we come here to learn and allow only positive energies to
share this physical space. If by chance a negative energy does
come through you might try telling the entity it is not welcome
and to GO AWAY in no uncertain terms. Then take a break and
come back using new "operators". Sometimes a person can attract
negative entities without being aware of it. Try the same
person on the board another time and the results will probably
be completely different.
Something that I believe is that a spirit cannot enter this physical
realm unless someone here opens the door for them, so to speak.
This is our dwelling place, not theirs. Also it's best not to
experiment with psychic phenomena around teenagers. You know
they'r at that point where their changing social scene and their
hormones can make them do really strange things. Personally I
think that energy combined with psychic energy can be pretty
dangerous. (Did you know that most poltergeist experiences have
been found to originate in homes with teenagers? Once they're
through puberty the phenomenon usually goes away.)
Nanci
|
8.44 | Yet another warning... | CSSE::BLANEY | Welcome to the JUNGLE....... | Fri Jun 24 1988 12:11 | 73 |
|
Hi,
I have been in this notes file for a couple of months now, and
I have replied to a couple of notes, but this note is a personal
issue for me, and I would just like to add a little of my own
experiences. There are no flames, nor am I trying to pass judgement
on anyone, I would just like to share my perceptions and experiences.
I have used a Ouija board for over 15 years. I have always been
the "easiest receiver", and therefore in great demand. My family
has always been very big on psychic phenomenom (sp?), and I was
raised in an environment of "just do it" -- caution to the wind. As
you can probably guess, this has led to more than one horror story.
I have had various experiences with "friendly" and "unfriendly"
entities. I agree emphatically with everyone who has suggested that
this is not a toy. I have had other psychic situations occur which
I am <<POSITIVE>> were directly related to ouija experiences. Is
there any one out there who can be ABSOLUTELY sure that the entity
which is expressing itself is not a threat?
Not to preach, but consider for example: If an entity wants an
avenue to this "plane" and KNOWS that to achieve this it must appear
"friendly" even if its intentions are not. I have to believe that
intellegence (even at a simple level) would dictate that in its
initial introduction, the entity would attempt a congenial meeting.
I realize that there are many experiences where the entity has
immediately made its intentions known, but through my various
experiences, I have found that on initial contact, the entity is
usually amicable. It is VERY tempting to re-establihs contact at
a later date, especially if the first contact was "successful" (i.e.
some accurate information was provided). I'm sure anyone can see
that this can begin a pattern which may become [nearly] addictive.
I have been privy to such a situation and it is very difficult to
reverse. There are a lot of notes within this file that I know
little or nothing about, but this is one that I feel I have some
experience. Ouija's are not harmless toys and I do NOT believe
that you can "protect" yourself from "evil" when using one. I accept
that some people feel safe(r) when utilizing one of the various
methods described in the previous replies, but if you feel that you
have to use one, then you understand the danger involved. It may
seem exciting, but WHAT IF your style of protection doesn't work?
Over the past 5 years I have not touched a ouija board, but recently
decided to try my hand at it again. The truly terrifying feeling
that went through my body when I placed my fingers on the planchet (sp?)
was unbelievable, I went physically ICE cold and I got real
"hot" in my head. Needless to say that was more than enough to
convince me that 5 years wasn't long enough.
I guess all I'm trying to say is BE VERY CAREFUL. There are many
well meaning people in this conference who may not agree with me, and
they are intitled to their opinions, but IF they use some type of
"protection", then aren't they in reality saying that there are
definitely "dangers"? Sometimes experience is the best teacher, and
unfortunately it is rare that we learn from other's mistakes. Just
be very thoughtful and take into consideration all the replies that
you've seen in this note.
Well, that's basically it, a REAL long-winded BE CAREFUL! Sorry if
this seems too long, I just have real intense feelings about this
one, and I apologize if I have offended anyone, 'cause that was not
my intention.
Thanks for hearing me out.
Laurel
|
8.45 | Re.-1 | CLUE::PAINTER | | Fri Jun 24 1988 13:07 | 8 |
|
Laurel,
Thanks for entering that.
Always best to be safe than sorry....and your note reinforced that.
Cindy
|
8.46 | eenie beanie, chili beanie ... | ILLUSN::SORNSON | Please adjust your set. | Mon Jun 27 1988 17:28 | 9 |
| This note has reminded me of a question I've wondered about (though I
don't encourage people to go out of their way to find out the answer).
Has anyone ever asked their ouija board spirits if there is a "correct"
or true religion, and if the answer was yes, was a specific religion
identified?
-mark
p.s., does this topic give anyone else the willies?
|
8.47 | credibility from an unknown and unverified source | MARKER::KALLIS | Don't confuse `want' and `need.' | Mon Jun 27 1988 18:05 | 21 |
| re .46 (Mark):
>Has anyone ever asked their ouija board spirits if there is a "correct"
>or true religion, and if the answer was yes, was a specific religion
>identified?
If one did, would you believe it?
One problem with Ouija-evoked entities is that they _could_ be okay,
but maybe not. Suppose you encountered a total stranger on the
street and asked him or her that question. Would you risk everything
on the answer the stranger gives?
Caution is the watchword here.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
>p.s., does this topic give anyone else the willies?
How does it give you the willies? Using such an instrument is
voluntary, after all ...
|
8.48 | Fear evokes negativity | BSS::BLAZEK | Dancing with My Self | Mon Jun 27 1988 18:29 | 9 |
| This topic does not give me the willies because I'm comfortable
with the always-positive communication I have with my guides,
and with the knowledge that if were to ever feel anything from
the board, it's *MY* hand and I can pull it away if necessary.
(For the record, I've never had to, but I have protections I
set up which have been very positive and successful.)
Carla
|
8.49 | questioning the question doesn't answer it | EDWIN::SORNSON | Please adjust your set. | Mon Jun 27 1988 23:30 | 67 |
| re .47 (Steve)
> If one did, would you believe it?
I didn't ask the question so that I could stake my beliefs upon it,
and whether I'd believe it or not should have nothing to do with the
answer (should it?).
> One problem with Ouija-evoked entities is that they _could_ be okay,
> but maybe not.
True, but that doesn't mean that they could not give an answer to
the question, if posed to require a direct, unambiguous answer. (Maybe
it's just my impression, but many of the allegedly spirit-originated
messaged posted in this conference are rather vague and generic, as if
they purposely were composed with a lack substance, as if to avoid
controversy that might cause one to question the merit and/or
truthfulness of the message.)
Whether or not the answer might be a lie is beside the point. The
question is, has anyone ever asked such a question, and with what
result? If so, then the merits of the answer can be discussed.
Hasn't anyone else ever thought to ask such a question? For my own
reasons, I wouldn't pursue contact with the spirit realm, but if I
didn't have the reservations that I do, I think my curiousity would
impell me to make that one of the first questions I'd ask.
> Suppose you encountered a total stranger on the
> street and asked him or her that question. Would you risk everything
> on the answer the stranger gives?
Not necessarily, but as I said above, I didn't mean to imply that I
was searching for an answer to stake my personal beliefs on. If I WERE
searching for the answer to such a question, though, I'd probably ask
more than one person, and make a decision only after having heard the
answer or answers. Again, what I personally feel to be the answer to
my own questions is beside the point.
The reason I think the matter is different than asking the 'man on
the street' is that many of the world's religions contain an aspect of
the supernatural, and both presume and teach the existance of God or
gods and/or other beings that exist invisibly to man's sight in the
spirit realm. If they do exist, then they, moreso than any human,
should be aware of the true state of affairs in the spirit realm.
Obviously, if one did ask a ouija board spirit what the true
religion was, if it answered, that would give one something to think
about. To my mind, this is a question with a potentially hard answer
to swallow. Are people only looking for easy answers to the easy
questions?
> Caution is the watchword here.
Given the substance of Laurel's reply, a few back, I couldn't agree
more, and as I said to begin with, I'm not suggesting that anyone
should go ahead and ask such a question (if they haven't already).
As to my "p.s.," it was meant somewhat rhetorically, since it's
obvious that a good many noters have no fear whatsoever of ouija board
communication. To me, that doesn't seem to be a very sensible
attitude, but then, that's just my opinion.
Re Laurel's reply; it seems that there's been a lot left unsaid.
Sounds like she's had a devil of a time of things.
-mark.
|
8.50 | Hope this sheds some Light | BSS::BLAZEK | Dancing with My Self | Tue Jun 28 1988 00:17 | 50 |
| re: .49 (Mark)
>> Hasn't anyone else ever thought to ask such a question?
I've never asked such a question, and doubt I ever will. For one
thing, defined religions don't interest me, therefore no desire's
present to find a "true religion" other than what's right for me,
which doesn't include anyone's definitions but my own. My truth,
my beliefs, my convictions, and my own experiences. That's about
all I can deal with. =8*)
>> I think my curiousity would impell me to make that one of the
>> first questions I'd ask.
In which case you must be more religion-oriented than I.
>> If they do exist, then they, moreso than any human, should be
>> aware of the true state of affairs in the spirit realm.
Ah yes, but it's all matter of perception, is it not? And this'd
be what you described below as "easy answers". For me, bypassing
lessons is not the way to growth. It may be easier to take an
airplane from Point A to Point B, but I'll miss a heckuva lot of
scenery and experiences, not to mention be putting faith in the
pilot, since I am unqualified (at present) to fly the plane on my
own.
>> Are people only looking for easy answers to the easy questions?
That's for individuals to answer. Speaking for myself, no. And
my guides give me anything but easy answers. Sometimes can take
months before I understand what their messages were conveying. I
don't do this for profit or for thrills, I do it for myself (and
my Self).
>> As to my "p.s.," it was meant somewhat rhetorically, since it's
>> obvious that a good many noters have no fear whatsoever of ouija
>> board communication. To me, that doesn't seem to be a very sensible
>> attitude, but then, that's just my opinion.
Cautionary practices are always advised, but fear? Similar to
worrying, I haven't found it accomplishes much other than to focus
negative energy on a situation. As the old adage says, "You get
what you give." In seeking positive guidance, I've been fairly
successful in achieving what I want. Don't believe adding fear
would be productive, it would be directing pure negativity. And
I'm not overly fond of what negativity attracts in *any* realm!
Carla
|
8.51 | further off track | EDWIN::SORNSON | Please adjust your set. | Tue Jun 28 1988 02:08 | 69 |
| re .48 & .50 (Carla)
> I've never asked such a question, and doubt I ever will. For one
> thing, defined religions don't interest me, therefore no desire's
> present to find a "true religion" other than what's right for me,
> which doesn't include anyone's definitions but my own. My truth,
> my beliefs, my convictions, and my own experiences. That's about
> all I can deal with. =8*)
Well, in that case, you can't really address my questions directly,
can you? But perhaps no one can. (Nevertheless, thanks for expressing
your thoughts.)
> In which case you must be more religion-oriented than I.
Maybe so, but I suspect that our views of what "religion" should be
all about (as opposed to what most religions are all about) may differ
somewhat. I don't think I would be amiss to label the kind of
spiritual pursuits you seek (to establish your own truth, beliefs,
convictions, and experiences) as "religious", though. It just might
not be 'orthodox.'
> >> If they do exist, then they, moreso than any human, should be
> >> aware of the true state of affairs in the spirit realm.
> Ah yes, but it's all matter of perception, is it not?
No, I don't think so. Either they exist, or they don't. If they
exist, they'll do so regardless of who does or does not perceive them.
The problem is that since ouija-board spirits evidently have a
propensity to lie to those that contact them, humans, having no direct
way of verifying the truth of anything they say, are limitted by their
individual, personal judgement. This personal judgement might well be
called "perception," but perception doesn't define reality. Such
perception is only an interpretation of (or reaction to) reality (or
what we might be told is reality).
> It may be easier to take an
> airplane from Point A to Point B, but I'll miss a heckuva lot of
> scenery and experiences, not to mention be putting faith in the
> pilot, since I am unqualified (at present) to fly the plane on my
> own.
At the moment, it's not my intention to lecture people as to what
'trips' they should or should not take. Speaking generally, though,
it's not always necessary to take a particular trip to know [with a
fair degree of certainty] that the trip is more trouble than it's
worth. Laurel's reply, which is evidently based on personal
experience, seems to confirm this general notion. If you've had a
different experience, then so be it -- but that gets off the subject of
my original inquiry.
> >> As to my "p.s.," it was meant somewhat rhetorically, since it's
> >> obvious that a good many noters have no fear whatsoever of ouija
> >> board communication. To me, that doesn't seem to be a very sensible
> >> attitude, but then, that's just my opinion.
>
> Cautionary practices are always advised, but fear? Similar to
> worrying, I haven't found it accomplishes much other than to focus
> negative energy on a situation. ...
> I'm not overly fond of what negativity attracts in *any* realm!
Well, if it's necessary to use cautionary practices, there must be
some danger, or at least the potential for danger. Fear of negative
consequences needn't be an abject, quaking fear; but rather, it can be
viewed as having a healthy respect for something that could easily
go out of control. Sometimes negativity "attracts" safety.
-mark.
|
8.52 | Yes,I asked | RANGLY::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Tue Jun 28 1988 08:57 | 24 |
|
Mark,
I have been using a Ouija board a couple of years now.I have several
hundred pages of material written down.My experience tells me that
I must understand that i am dealing with other souls,individual
personalities,each one different.Therefore,i must relate to them
just as i would meeting other souls here on this plane.A relationship
must be established over a period of time,in order to know the person.
In this way you are able to discern whether you believe what they
may tell you.
To answer your question,Yes,i have asked that question.Whether
you will believe it,is your choice to make.I was told that "God
loves all religions that are based on his basic commandments"If
you look at all the established religions and their basic moral
standards,you will find a common set of rules,common to all.They
are all influenced by his spirit.God deals with us each individually
based on whether we follow those basic commands,whatever we may
believe.
Peace
Michael
|
8.53 | Short request | SCOPE::PAINTER | | Wed Jun 29 1988 11:35 | 22 |
|
Thanks Mike, for providing the answer to the question that Mark
asked, which seemed to have almost gotten lost back in the defensive
rhetoric somewhere.
Just my own opinion/observation - there were quite a number of
assumptions made by everyone involved in the last oh, 15 notes or
so - assumptions that seemed to me to be a little unfair, and then
the whole issue became compounded (which is usually evident when
people start extracting and replying to prior messages....again
just my own observation).
Could we perhaps adopt an "I'm OK, you're OK" attitude with regard
to using a ouija board please? In other words - it's OK for those
who wish to use a ouija board, and it's OK for those who do not wish
to use a ouija board. I happen to be in the latter group for my
own valid reasons, however I will not pass judgment upon those who
do use ouija boards.
OK?
Cindy
|
8.54 | I'm okay??? | MARKER::KALLIS | Don't confuse `want' and `need.' | Wed Jun 29 1988 11:48 | 22 |
| Re .53 (Cindy):
>Could we perhaps adopt an "I'm OK, you're OK" attitude with regard
>to using a ouija board please? In other words - it's OK for those
>who wish to use a ouija board, and it's OK for those who do not wish
>to use a ouija board. I happen to be in the latter group for my
>own valid reasons, however I will not pass judgment upon those who
>do use ouija boards.
Cindy, I don't think I ever "passed judgement" on those who use
Ouija boards. I did and have posted cautions about them, specifically
that I don't consider them toys or parlor games, and that treating
them as such is not a good idea.
However, if someone asked me, "I've never used a Ouija board, and
I wonder whether or not I should," I'd probably advise against him
or her doing so. But not that this person has not _yet_ used one.
As for those that have, it certainly would be presumptious of me
to say, "Stop that!"
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
8.55 | Yes, you are. And so is every one else. | SCOPE::PAINTER | | Wed Jun 29 1988 14:13 | 7 |
|
Um...Steve...I didn't mention your name or anyone elses. It was
just meant as a general observation, that's all.
Don't feel so guilty! (;^) You're OK.
Cindy
|
8.56 | ;^) | SWSNOD::DALY | Serendipity 'R' us | Thu Jun 30 1988 11:22 | 3 |
| Yeah, Steve. You're way past OK - all the way up to OKEY-DOKEY!
Marion
|
8.57 | "Where the Streets Have No Names" | BSS::BLAZEK | Dancing with My Self | Fri Jul 01 1988 17:17 | 51 |
| re: .51 (Mark)
>> Well, in that case, you can't really address my questions
>> directly, can you? But perhaps no one can.
*You* can. 8-)
>> I don't think I would be amiss to label the kind of spiritual
>> pursuits you seek ... as "religious", though. It just might
>> not be 'orthodox.'
I'd be happier with spiritual pursuits rather than religious.
Call it semantics, but the word "religion" inspires thoughts
of churches, boundaries, and restrictions. But that's just
me!
>> The problem is that since ouija-board spirits evidently have a
>> propensity to lie to those that contact them
I would say that people who get on a Ouija board and ask for
"whoever is out there" are not using good judgement in their
practices. Somewhat similar to walking down a street wearing
a blindfold and calling out for strangers to gather round and
answer questions. Not necessarily advisable, eh? However, I
believe we all have guides (guardian angels, if you like) who
travel with us throughout lifetimes. Because I don't ask my
guides for advice nor ask futuristic questions (they wouldn't
give such answers anyway) I'm not concerned with being lied to.
My guides are lovingly present in my life for positive support.
As Mike said, you build a relationship with them, you learn
about their personalities and energy, and you develop a level
of trust.
>> Speaking generally, though, it's not always necessary to take
>> a particular trip to know [with a fair degree of certainty]
>> that the trip is more trouble than it's worth.
I agree. But my point had to do with not taking shortcuts or
looking for easy answers, something you mused Ouija board
users could be after.
>> Well, if it's necessary to use cautionary practices, there must
>> be some danger, or at least the potential for danger.
Seems you're intent on labelling the Ouija board as negative.
Many people seek thrills, many people find thrills. Whatever
you're into is what you'll find no matter what tools you use.
At least in my experience.
Peace, Carla
|
8.58 | | ILLUSN::SORNSON | Please adjust your set. | Fri Jul 01 1988 18:00 | 69 |
| re .57 (Carla)
> >> Well, in that case, you can't really address my questions
> >> directly, can you? But perhaps no one can.
>
> *You* can. 8-)
Can do, but won't. :)
I absolutely agree that the word "religion" tends to inspire
thoughts of "churches, boundaries, and restrictions", but it's still
sufficiently broad a word to apply to more unstructured "spiritual
pursuits." It appears to be true that many people have simply replaced
'structured' spiritual pursuits for 'unstructured' (or less orthodox)
ones. It strikes me that many of the pursuits advocated by DEJAVUers,
though being very "unbounded" by ecclesiastical authority, are still
somewhat ritualistic. The associated ritualism alone could easily lead
one to see them as "religious." (Is not paganism an alternate form of
religion when contrasted to the world's major monotheistic religions?)
> I would say that people who get on a Ouija board and ask for
> "whoever is out there" are not using good judgement in their
> practices. Somewhat similar to walking down a street wearing
> a blindfold and calling out for strangers to gather round and
> answer questions. Not necessarily advisable, eh?
I find it easy to agree with this statement.
> However, I
> believe we all have guides (guardian angels, if you like) who
> travel with us throughout lifetimes. Because I don't ask my
> guides for advice nor ask futuristic questions (they wouldn't
> give such answers anyway) I'm not concerned with being lied to.
> My guides are lovingly present in my life for positive support.
The thing about this is that neither you nor I has the ability to
confirm whether or not the spirits that act like "guardian angels" are
any more legitimate than someone that comes to the beckonning of a
blindman in the street. You are still simply taking them at their word
as to who they are (if they have said who they are), or you are simply
believing the inclinations of your imagination.
Now, since you feel that they have been a loving and positive
influence in your life, I'm not going to argue with you about it, since
1) that would truly be negative :-) and 2) I don't feel the need to
impose my reservations on the whole matter of spirit contact upon you.
(My stating that I have reservations is no need for you to get
defensive, in other words.)
> I agree. But my point had to do with not taking shortcuts or
> looking for easy answers, something you mused Ouija board
> users could be after.
Actually I didn't intend to make any assertions at all about what
Ouija board users could be after. I think you've read more into my
comment about "easy answers" than I had intended.
> Seems you're intent on labelling the Ouija board as negative.
If you mean that I'm intent on convincing YOU that using the Ouija
board is negative, you're wrong. True, I see it as dangerous, but
that's only my own view, which I have made no attempt to make binding
upon you or upon anyone else. My only goal was to see if anyone was in
a position to answer my original questions.
There's no need for everyone to be so defensive.
grins,
-mark.
|
8.59 | Who's knocking on my brain? | BSS::BLAZEK | Dancing with My Self | Fri Jul 01 1988 18:47 | 25 |
| re: .58 (Mark)
Sorry Mark, I didn't mean to come across as defensive!
>> The thing about this is that neither you nor I has the ability
>> to confirm whether or not the spirits that act like "guardian
>> angels" are any more legitimate than someone that comes to the
>> beckonning of a blindman in the street.
I agree. But I would (hopefully) know within a matter of time
whether I liked and/or trusted the person who approached me,
assuming I was the blindman in this scenario.
>> you are simply believing the inclinations of your imagination.
Can be quite self-amusing at times, often very fulfilling.
=8*)
>> (My stating that I have reservations is no need for you to get
>> defensive, in other words.)
No worries!
Peace, Carla
|
8.60 | Religious Semantics | USAT05::KASPER | Life is like a beanstalk, isn't it... | Mon Jul 04 1988 00:33 | 19 |
| RE: .57, .58
About the word religion... (this is a quote from _The_Power_of_Myth_).
<begin quote>
MOYERS: Well then, what is religion?
CAMBELL: The word "religion" means religio, linking back. If we say it is
the one life in both of us, then my separate life has been linked to the
one life, religio, linked back. This has become symbolized in the images
of religion, which represent that connecting back.
<end quote>
I didn't like the word either until I understood what it really meant.
I have to say that my spritual quest *is* an attempt to link my Self back
to The Source, First Cause, God, the Absoulte (or whatever one chooses to
call It), therefore, in this context, it is a religious quest...
Terry (playing_with_semantics)
|
8.61 | MONOPOLY TOO | VENTUR::FLAIG | The Waiting is the Hardest Part | Thu Aug 11 1988 14:15 | 6 |
|
I mean this without insult to anyone, I don't understand why a game
board made by Parker Brothers is part of a link between two levels
of exsistence. Would the same effect occur if people sat around
a Monopoly board? How is it that this concept developed?
|
8.62 | maybe this will help | MARKER::KALLIS | Anger's no replacement for reason | Thu Aug 11 1988 14:31 | 26 |
| Re .61:
The Ouija was developed when there was a high interest in spiritism.
It evolved from the planchette, where a simpler planchette with
a pencil was used to enable people to write out messages [whether
what was coming out was "channeled" information or from Something
Else is not relevant; what is relevant is that the methodology was
known]. The Ouija Board was just meant as a simple and nonambiguous
way of receiving messages.
>......... Would the same effect occur if people sat around
>a Monopoly board?
No. An analogy: years ago, you could by "chemistry sets." These
were available over the counter at toy stores. With such sets,
you could amuse yourself with tricks (e.g., "turning water to wine"
or vice versa using phenolthalein), making things of some utility
(e.g., making "invisible inks"), or even manufacturing dangerous
substances (all had the ingredients necessary for producing gunpowder,
for instance). Does the fact one bought the set at a toy store
prevent it from being used destructively? Likewise the Ouija: there
was an _intense_ interest in things involving spirits when it came
out. Parker Brothers manufacture(d) it as something to be used
for entertainment; that it may be something more is something else.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
8.63 | Monopoly as transcedent experience... | AITG::PARMENTER | Laws don't change by obeying them | Tue Aug 16 1988 09:51 | 20 |
| re .61:
I don't know, but somehow whenever *I* play Monopoly, I can feel
the spirits welling up inside me. Indeed, I might say that Monopoly
*does* bridge the gap between levels of reality. Imagine a reality
where Atalantic City is arranged in a humoungous square, with the
county jail at one corner. For the effort of going through this
mystical city block, you are paid 200 dollars (provided you are
not on your way to Jail). You can own railroads without trains,
and pay for utilities that do not exist. *Very* Zen-like. The
streets are straightand paved in colors and every building is a
stark green house or a monolithic red hotel. These identical buildings
are everywhere! If you are really lucky, you'll make it to the
boardwalk. People are transported in what appear to be hats, shoes
and racing cars around and around, eternally exchanging brightly
colored currency for the privilege of existing in this strange world.
:-)
- Dan
|
8.64 | - | USAT05::KASPER | Life is like a beanstalk, isn't it... | Tue Aug 16 1988 10:40 | 6 |
| RE: .63 (Dan)
Sounds more like the 'Twilight Zone'...
Terry
|
8.65 | Stirrin' up the silt. | SCOMAN::RUDMAN | Overeat,v. To dine. | Tue Aug 16 1988 16:20 | 26 |
| re: .62 Mr. Kallis, I do not think your analogy fits. A test tube
or two of gunpowder and applied flame can loose you body parts.
"Misuse" of an ouija board (an MB special or an ornate
hand-made one) does what? Sounds like we need a note on
Bad Ouija Board Experiences to get the feel of the
consequences of misuse. Has anyone, using an O board,
contacted a "spirit" whose becoming a spirit was directly
related to the misuse of his/her board while on the physical
plane?
re: .63 Change a few words and you could enter it in a Dream or
Mystical Experience note. Well done!
My experience with an O board was indirect (the planchette just
sat there when I tried it) and was odd to say the least. Some of
the questions asked of it were accurately answered (nothing heavy;
just a bunch of guys with time one their hands and no burning
questions); half were posed w/o knowing the answers but were confirmed
later. This was in 1969, and I had no further interest in it, chalking
it up to coincidence. Lately I've leaned of those who positively will
not have one in their home. A singular reaction to flat pieces of
plastic and pressed board.
Is the movie WITCHBOARD based on a actual occurance? :-)
Don
|
8.66 | | GENRAL::DANIEL | still here | Tue Aug 16 1988 17:19 | 7 |
| >Mr. Kallis, I do not think your analogy fits.
"Mr. Kallis" ???
How do you know it's not "DR." ?
:-)
|
8.67 | | MARKER::KALLIS | Anger's no replacement for reason | Tue Aug 16 1988 17:49 | 15 |
| Re .65 (Don):
>.............. Sounds like we need a note on
>Bad Ouija Board Experiences to get the feel of the
>consequences of misuse. ...
I think in some of the current notes there are already examples.
You might want to check out notes 242, 421, 433, 476, and 499.
>Is the movie WITCHBOARD based on a actual occurance? :-)
No. I've reviewed it in this and in the MOVIES Conference.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
8.68 | AREN'T WE OFF TRACK HERE??? | JULIET::THOMPSON_LI | | Wed Aug 17 1988 18:05 | 13 |
| I'm not a Ouija board user.....I don't know if I ever will be...however
I must admit my interest sure has been sparked by this conference.
At the start, there were some *really* great "accountings" of peoples
experiences with the Ouija board, and very interesting opinions
of various situations.
My point: haven't we gotten a bit off the subject here? Do we
have to analyze everyones comments & remarks. How about getting
back to some *good* Ouija board experiences??? That IS what this
note is about, right????
Interested Observer
|
8.69 | | GENRAL::DANIEL | still here | Wed Aug 17 1988 19:43 | 9 |
| In my early teens, a friend of mine and I used the OUIJA to ask who we were
going to marry. I had a crush on a guy named Ron at the time, so when I saw
R-O as the first two letters, I got thrilled, but then the third letter was a
D. I thought, Oh No! and was disappointed.
A little over a year ago, I started seeing Rod, and we are making wedding plans
now.
;-)
|
8.70 | Opinions for free | DECWET::MITCHELL | The Cosmic Anchovy | Thu Aug 18 1988 17:14 | 8 |
|
> Is the movie WITCHBOARD based on a actual occurance? <
The movie is such a turkey, don't even bother to find out.
John M.
|
8.71 | one of many | BIGALO::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Fri Aug 19 1988 11:30 | 14 |
|
I could write a book on my Ouija experiences.I have entered several
in this conference.The only way to know about something like this,is
to experience it.I have.Just last night i communicated with a girl
who was a slave in the 1800s.
Just one experience i had that i think is quite interesting.I
once asked my contact where my son was,and,he discribed who he was
with,and where.Later i confirmed it with my son.I did not know the
people he was with.
To tell my story,would take about 500 pages.
Peace
Michael
|
8.72 | Have your Astral Elephant Gun Ready... | NEXUS::MORGAN | Experiencing the Age of Xochipilli. | Sat Aug 20 1988 00:33 | 25 |
| I have to echo some of Steve's sentiments here.
It takes a lot of energy to move a plachette and typically lower astral
entities have energy to shed. These entities can be sportive too,
somtimes telling the truth and other times leading one on a merry
chase.
I am working with a fearful woman who made contact with an 18th century
opera singer Bob who says that see will not find a sastifying
relationship with a man until after she dies. Nice story!
We have pointed out that she will have to let go of this connection
before it drives her insane (by manifesting himself in her reality
sphere uninvited).
The moral here is that if one wants to communicate with higher powers
they should communicate with those entities that have already learned
to economize their remaining energy, ie, sporting is a waste of energy
so they give truthful and correct answers the first time or better yet
they do not communicate with the physical.
Still one has a choice and the adventure lies in following a path to
its end to see what's there. Just remember that on the lower astral all
sorts of ickky things abound. Have your 8 gauge astral elephant gun
ready. B^)
|
8.73 | BEWARE | BIGALO::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Sat Aug 20 1988 08:15 | 13 |
|
ref .72
If BOB could convince her of that,and,she took her life,she would
be on his level,which is what he wants.She is in a very vulnerable
position,and,if THEY see this,they will work on her.This is one
of the dangers of using the Ouija.
Peace
Michael
|
8.74 | Just another Ouija recollection. | NAMBE::AWILLETO | Set spirit_level=divine | Tue Oct 18 1988 13:22 | 42 |
|
-< Hmmmm, interesting! >-
I have read this topic with an interest which caused me to remember
an Ouija experience of my own.
I was a child when it happened. My family was given an Ouija
board by a neighbor, my parents had no interest in 'the thing' so
it was stored away and forgotten. We never really had any interest
in such things - being from a proper 'christian' family - so my
sisters and I weren't all that curious about the Ouija board.
That is until one day a friend of my sister spotted it in our
basement and was intensely excited about trying it - for fun(!).
Well, we saw no harm in it and proceded to follow the instructions
of play. At first we had no response, but we soon found that the
planchette worked for a certain pairing of us at the board at a
time! The best responses were obtained when my younger sister and
I were partnered at the board - I couldn't believe it actually moved!
We continued to play 'the game' for weeks - asking silly childrens'
questions. I don't remember any of the questions we asked, except
for one - "Who is answering our questions?".
'D O N ' T A S K', was the reply. Were we ever spooked by
that answer. Needless to say, we never played the Ouija again.
But, now I wonder if the spirit was kind enough to warn us against
continued play so that we can avoid future harm? From reading previous
notes it does seem that it was a danger for us then. I don't delve
into such 'occult' activities and don't really mean any real harm,
but I do have an interest - I find this a curiosity!
Any opinions?
Regards,
Anthony
|
8.75 | | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Tue Oct 18 1988 14:57 | 12 |
| HI ANTHONY,
It is possible that the spirit was warning you.It would be interesting
to know how many people use the OUIJA board on a regular basis,and,for
what reason.
I wonder if any scientific study has ever been done on Ouija boards?
I could tell you some responses i've gotten that would stand the
hair up on the back of your neck!
Peace
Michael
|
8.76 | It hurts every time I hit myself with this hammer. | WRO8A::WARDFR | Going HOME--as an Adventurer | Tue Oct 18 1988 15:54 | 25 |
| re: .75 (Michael)
You know, Michael, I've been reading your replies since the
first time I entered these notesfiles one and a half years ago
and I am somewhat puzzled. What I am puzzled about is why it is
that you choose to dabble in so much negativity? You have repeatedly
indicated that there are dangers and that there are "demons" who
warn about "hell" and other negative concepts/ideas/places and
yet you continue to use the OUIJA as a source for what? enlightenment?
[Please note that the "Tone" of this is supposed to be mild, not
confrontational or abusive...I'm just not sure of how to ask this
in a serious manner and not sound that way.]
Surely there are better sources of information than OUIJA boards,
aren't there? I mean, we keep talking about positivism and
hope and spirituality (in the positive sense) and yet OIUJA boards
clearly are a mixed bag...there are other "bags" available on this
plane, in this reality, that aren't even a little bit negative.
Why not access them, instead? It's almost as though you "get off"
on the negative potentials...
Any truth for you in what I say?
Frederick
|
8.77 | moved by moderator | MARKER::KALLIS | Anger's no replacement for reason | Tue Oct 18 1988 16:04 | 18 |
| < Note 891.0 by FRICK::ROSADO >
-< Ouija boards >-
As I wrote in another notesfile (before I finally figured out
how to add dejavu to my files), the ouija board really works.
How many of you have ever tried using one? I mean, just as a
game, not like I'm REALLY into this, but I've tried it a couple
of times with a friend of mine (years ago). Both of us were
convinced that the OTHER person was moving the triangle.
It has to played in a dark, quiet, room and you have to both
concentrate. (No laughing). And ask serious questions, not
like: Whats tonights lottery number or when is the world gonna
end. A couple of times I used the board by myself (Yes, it worked
I Knew I wasn't moving it). Well, I gave up fooling around with
it when it was getting just a bit too scary. (Ever watched the
movie "Witchboard" on HBO? I'm talking hearts pounding here.
Has anything really scary happened to you using Ouija?
|
8.78 | moved by moderator | MARKER::KALLIS | Anger's no replacement for reason | Tue Oct 18 1988 16:05 | 20 |
| < Note 891.1 by FHQ::OGILVIE "The EYES have it!" >
-< NEVER AGAIN.... >-
I'll have to just "sum" this one up real quick:
When I was fifteen and my "boyfriend's" sister was fourteen, we
both figured we "fool" around with my ouija board. Summing it up,
her "boyfriend" (also my neighber) was going to be in a car accident
on a street beginning with the letter "W".
A couple of months later, she and her brother were killed in a car
accident, driven by my neighbor.....on Water Street!
That was IT!! Into the trash it went......I wouldn't allow a ouija
board in my house ever again!
Cheryl
|
8.79 | Re. 74 | FRICK::ROSADO | | Tue Oct 18 1988 16:44 | 14 |
| Anthony, that reply you got was weird. When I used the board,
the first question I asked it was: what is your name? Then I ask,
how old are you? My boards name was Samuel,when I asked his <--(?)
age, it said: 17. I mean, every board has a name. Keep in mind
of course that these "names of the boards" are dead people. Now
don't even THINK of trying the Ouija by yourself. I've tried that.
NO WAY, EVER AGAIN. At first, I figured, oh this isn't so bad. here
I've got a board who calls itself Samuel....no problem.....
I know a lot of people who would laugh this off but until you really
try it.......I wonder about the person who invented this game...wonder
how it works, how it knows things.........
|
8.80 | Reliving the moment | NAMBE::AWILLETO | New car, caviar, 4-star daydream. . . | Tue Oct 18 1988 18:56 | 18 |
|
RE: -1
Yes, it was weird. I can almost refeel the chill up my back
and the sence of someone nearby - watching.
RE: .75
Yes, tell me more.
Regards,
Anthony
|
8.81 | | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Wed Oct 19 1988 13:19 | 30 |
|
Fredrick,
Well,to me,my experience has been enlightening,in that,i have
learned quite a bit in the process,not only about myself,but also
of others.I see my experience as dealing with the negative aspects,
and,at the same time getting some positive use of it,such as my
making contact with my father thru "JIM",and also my first wife
as well as the mother of a good friend.It helped my friend and her
family to deal with her death.
It would be hard to explain the relationship i have with "JIM"
without spending several hours explaining it.I will say that for
me,i have a great curiousity about whats happening in the spirit
world,and,the Ouija board has given me some insight into it.If i
had gotten totally negative from my experience,i probably would
have put the board away.
I continue to warn people of the board,because,if you dont know
what you are dealing with,it could be hurtful to you.I have two
boards,one which i use very seldom,since all the spirits i have
talked to on it have been very evil.
I dont think i will repeat what i was told by that board,since
it could be upsetting to some who read this conference.
I dont spend much time now on the board,only occasionally.
This might be interesting,or,it may have been a coincidence,but,
my contact once told me that Satan was in Pakistan.The very next
day i read in the news paper that the President of Pakistan was
killed in an airplane crash.Now they are saying that the plane was
sabotaged,but,didnt know how or with what.
|
8.82 | ...walking the planchette... | WRO8A::WARDFR | Going HOME--as an Adventurer | Wed Oct 19 1988 14:03 | 17 |
| re: .81
Mike, thanks for the reply. Clearly the board has had
a great deal of value for you.
I tend to look for the greatest value at times, without
recognizing or acknowledging "other" values...and greatest values
to me may not be so to someone else. In any case, what I was
attempting to convey and you helped clarify is: avoid using the
OIUJA board unless it is known precisely what one is attempting
to find out and, if known, is this the most elegant way to do so?
Moreover, information coming from the board may not be of high
quality, and this needs to be kept in mind.
Does this appear to be a fair approach?
Frederick
|
8.83 | | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Wed Oct 19 1988 16:23 | 12 |
| Fredrick,
I can only speak from my own viewpoint,based on my experience.Of
course,that could change at any time.I would say you have expressed
what i feel about it,as of today.We should always proceed causiously
when dealing with things we have little understanding of.We must
decide what we do in life,whether evil or good,based on our personal
values and beliefs.
Peace
Michael
|
8.84 | "About to Try" | DELNI::STUCZYNSKI | | Wed Oct 19 1988 16:41 | 13 |
|
Hi Mike,
I have an amazing curiousity for the board. As a matter of fact
I'm about to embark on my first adventure this evening. Is there
anything you can tell me that will give me a reasonably "good"
experience ??? I'll be using it with a friend of mine that has
used a board of her own. She's been in contact with a rather
undesirable fellow. We'll be using a different board tonight and
she's wondering if this guy will appear even though we aren't using
her board. What do you think ?????
"D"
|
8.85 | | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Thu Oct 20 1988 08:02 | 26 |
|
Hi "D",
There are several places in this conference that talks about safety
and discusses methods.Many have suggested visualizing being surrounded
by white light,or,praying for protection from any negative
influence.You might want to read all the entrys on Ouija,if you
havnt already.
Its not likely you will have the same person that your friend
has on her board.Each board has a different spirit assigned to it,
but different ones may be assigned at different times,so,if you
were not using the board for a while,you might find someone different
the next time you used it.
I have had "JIM",who is my contact,break in on a conversation
i was having with someone on another board.I also have had
conversations with the contact on my neighbors board,thru "JIM".
Some spirits have more than one board assigned to them.My contact
"JIM" has several.He even had one in the same town.He told me who
the person was,and,where they lived.I checked it out and found it
to be true.I didnt make contact with the person who had the board,
since i had promised "JIM" that i wouldnt.It was a matter of trust,
and,he wanted to show me that he was real.
Peace
Michael
|
8.86 | "Worked out well" | DELNI::STUCZYNSKI | | Thu Oct 20 1988 14:31 | 29 |
|
Hi Mike,
Thanks for the reply ! My friend is a little more experienced
in using the board than I am. Although, she still isn't sure how
to start. I had some success last night in speaking with my
Grandmother. It sure was an eerie feeling ! I wanted her to prove
to me that it was really her so I asked questions that only she
would know. Something interesting happened too. She asked me to
help her and when I asked her what she wanted, she said "Come Now".
I probably should have asked her where she wanted me to go but I
didn't think of it till later.
Tell me, is it ever possible to contact someone when only one
of the persons using the board believes ??? And is it advisable
to use the board by yourself ??? Before I spoke with my Grandmother
we got some strange responses. Someone was definitely there but
we couldn't get the person to tell us who he or she was. The board
made no sense at all. At one point, there was someone there that
we thought may speak a foreign language. When we questioned the
person the board went to the number 6, twice in a row, and the place
it stopped next was between the 5 and 6. I'm not really up on the
subject of you know who but my friend said that three 6's is REAL
BAD. Will a person build a relationship with a spirit based on
how often the board is used ???? I'm really looking forward to
using the board again though. I just hope I continue to have good
experiences. Have you had any not so good experiences ????
"D"
|
8.87 | take it slow | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Fri Oct 21 1988 08:11 | 21 |
|
"D",
I dont know if you have read all the Ouija entries yet,but,you will
find quite a few of mine,which will tell you what i believe concerning
the boards.I have had some contacts that were not good,and,had to
terminate our contact.I have communicated with one that knew German,
and would,at times,spell out in German,and i would have to ask him
to translate.I'm curious if your grandmother told you anything that
would prove it was her?The boards have spirits that control it,and,it
is through them that you would get contact,and,only if she was on
the same spirit plane.The 666 response would be in accord with my
belief.Usually there is more energy with 2 people working the board,
so,it makes for better contact.It would take some time to get to
know the spirit,and,whether it would be willing to develop a
relationship with you.You would have to be very careful to scrutinize
your communication with it.
Peace
Michael
|
8.88 | "Maybe yes, maybe no" | DELNI::STUCZYNSKI | | Fri Oct 21 1988 09:57 | 16 |
|
Hi Mike,
These are things I asked my grandmother......
What is my mother's name ???
When was she born ?? Month ?? Day ??
What day did you leave us ?? Month ?? Day ??
What year were born ??
What's my boyfriend's name ?? (When she died I was married)
She got all the answers right ! Do you think it could not have
been her ???
Debbie
|
8.89 | ex | LEDS::BATES | | Fri Oct 21 1988 10:18 | 9 |
|
I have a rather naive question -
Don't you have to ask for answers that you yourself might not know
but could check up on later? Since you're one of the people controlling
the planchette, it would seem to me that the disposition would be
to supply (subconsciously) answers that you already knew.
Gloria
|
8.90 | Be skeptical | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Fri Oct 21 1988 12:40 | 16 |
|
Debbie,
I think the only way you would know,would be to remember your
grandmothers mannerisms and personality.After a time you can sense
these things.I would hope that it wasnt,because its not a very good
place to be.It could be that if you own the board,the spirit gathered
imformation on you and your family,in order to trick you when you
used it.I have had my contact ask me things about things that took
place in our house,when we were not on the board.One time he told
us something our son had done while we were away from home.Dont
you think our son was surprised!
Peace
Michael
|
8.91 | Theories | ERLTC::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Fri Oct 21 1988 14:32 | 109 |
| RE: Last bunch.
Debbie, you can believe whatever you wish, and I would be the last
person to call you foolish or to in any way look down on you. I
certainly have no monopoly on the truth, and my opinions could easily
be wrong, but consider the alternatives.
First off, I think it important to keep in mind that Michael is
speaking from his own experience (as he would be the first to say).
When, for example, he says that each spirit is associated with a
particular board that is what he has found to be true and/or has been
told by the personalities he has "spoken to" through the board. Others
have had the same experience, but still others (perhaps a slight
majority) have a radically different experience -- that the people
using the board (as a group, and including, to some extent "active
onlookers"), along with their intentions and mood determines who they
contact and whatever board they use is largely irrelevant. Similarly,
the cosmology discovered by each independent group of users through the
use of the Ouija board tends to be quite substantially different,
though most are based on the basic Judaic/Christian model (I know of no
studies of cosmological models developed from Ouija or related
techniques from "operators" with non Judaic/Christian backgrounds -- it
would be interesting).
There are basically 7 theories about how the Ouija works:
1) It doesn't.
2) It's fraud on the part of one or more of the operators.
3) It is the result of expectations on the part of the operators
manifesting through a level just below the conscious.
4) It is the result of a complex subconscious interaction among
the operators, and others present, effected by group dynamics,
expectations, desires, fears, knowledge and beliefs manifesting
through multiple levels of the subconscious -- from the almost
conscious to very "deep" levels very divorced from the conscious
personality.
5) As in 4 but with the belief that some information comes into
the subconscious via ESP (telepathy, clairvoyance, precognition,
retrocognition, etc.)
6) It is the result of subconscious manipulations but that those
manipulations are directed by personalities which are independent
of the operators.
7) It is the result of direct manipulation of the planchette by
independent personalities who use the operators only as a
means of activation or as a source material energy.
The questions you would want asked, Gloria (in .89), are those
necessary to distinguish 4 or (more weakly 5) from 6 or 7. The intent
seems to be to determine the truth of the statements made by the
spirits about their identity under 6 or 7. Note that under 6, your
questions would be more appropriate since it is reasonable to suppose
that a spirit who can speak through your subconscious can pick up the
answers to such questions the same way.
Without bothering with the details, we can say that people who believe
in the first three possibilities are simply unfamiliar with Ouija
boards. Very little familiarity with them allows brings about
observations inconsistent with those theories.
I personally, subscribe to 5. There are very few cases of events
inconsistent with number 4 and those are quite adequately explained by
reference to 5. A very, very few cases require a bit of stretching
from 5. Theories 6 and 7 are also consistent with all the available
observations (indeed, its a little hard to imagine what observations
they would be inconsistent with) but very frequently require a great
deal of stretching to make them work.
Since almost everything needed for 5 to be true has already been
established by other means, while almost everything needed for 6 and 7
to be true is based entirely on the Ouija board or similar mechanisms
(e.g., automatic writing). Confidently I can say that the universe
implied by 6 or 7 is orders of magnitude more complex than that implied
by 5. If someone sees another person drop a coin and you go over and
look and find a quarter, you do not assume that they actually dropped
another coin but a vast armada of spaceships arrived conquered the
Earth, switched coins and forced everyone to go back to where they were
moments before they arrived then blanked everyones mind of the event.
It *might* be true, but when there is a much simpler explanation for
everything you observe you can't say that you have any real evidence
for the more complex explanation.
Four (and thus 5) is scary for a lot of people. They are comfortable
with the idea of the subconscious (i.e., that there are parts of their
mind that they are not aware of and do not control) only if it is a
little "closet" tucked away in the back, or at most a small dark
cellar. They are uncomfortable with the idea that the conscious --
what they consider themselves -- is only a tiny piece of the whole
mind, no more than the tiny vestibule on the front door of a vast
skyscraper.
What 4 and 5 presume is that anything which the operators might have
had the opportunity to learn, or guess or deduce (even if they would
have to be very, very smart to make such a deduction) might be known to
the subconscious. Phrases in a foreign language, and sometimes even
substantial amounts of the language, can, for example be picked up from
very casual contact. In addition, it can be shown that people can
signal to each other using body language, so anything known by anyone
in the room during a session is consistent with 4 -- without even
invoking the ESP in 5.
Well I've rambled on quite long enough (longer actually).
Topher
|
8.92 | I can only speak for myself | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Fri Oct 21 1988 16:22 | 12 |
|
I guess i would say that i believe 5-7,that is why i suggested that
Debbie read all the Ouija material,to get a broader perspective.It
is something we each have to decide for ourselves based on knowledge
and experience.Like Topher says,its only my beliefs,based on my
experience with it.Its an area that has no solid proof,but,a lot
of theories.Perhaps at some point in time we will know for sure
what we are dealing with.
Peace
Michael
|
8.93 | Info anyone? | PENUTS::CIMICS | | Fri Oct 21 1988 16:56 | 9 |
|
Hi, I have been reading these Ouija notes for a while, and I have
a question. Where can I find information about Ouija boards? I
cant seem to find a book anywhere. I had an Ouija board 4 years
ago, used it a little without much luck. It broke and I got another
about a year ago, haven't used it yet. Is there anywhere that I
could get more information about this?
Curious......Sheila
|
8.94 | The Rise and Stall of the Third Reich | USMRM1::MMCCARTHY | | Sat Oct 22 1988 00:03 | 34 |
| In an earlier note my brother, Michael, told the story about my involvement
with an entity named Charles Robert Hanover III. We have now been
in continuous contact with Charles--via the Ouija board--for over
three years. All of the conversations have been taped and subsequently
transcribed. The transcriptions now fill two large three-ring
notebooks, and we are now about to start on the third. Suffice
it to say that we have covered numerous fascinating (a weak adjective
when describing this) subjects. There is SO much I could tell you
about Charles and our discussions with him. However, given the
limitations of space and the enormity of the subject matter involved,
I will relate one story for your perusal and comment.
In one of our sessions, Charles was holding forth on one of his
favorite subjects: the ley line. VERY briefly, the ley line is one
continuous line of "energy" which spirals around the earth. This
line affects our world in the physical, mental, and--most
importantly--spiritual realms. In one example of the power of the
ley line, Charles told of situation which occured in Czechslovakia in
1944. It seem that on a particular road in the countryside,
automobiles would
pass a certain spot on the road and simply die--the engines would
stall out; the operators could not restart the engines, no matter
how hard they tried. This went on for months, and according to
Charles, was a result in a shift in the Ley line. What he found
most humorous about this story was the fact that the Czechs believed
that the neighboring Germans had developed some sort of "ray" which
would enable them to zap their cars. Charles told us that we could
find an account of the story in the New york Times. He gave us
the month and the date of the issue. The next day, I went to the
Worcester public library and looked up the particular issue he had
told us about. I had to search through microfilm to find it, But
I DID find it, in the exact issue where he said we'd find it--including
the little aside about th "ray." Wonderful story from a wonderful
man
|
8.95 | | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Sat Oct 22 1988 08:46 | 13 |
| ref .93
I have been able to find books on the Ouija board at the public
library.
Ref .94
Thats an interesting story.Have you ever asked Charles about where
he is,and,what its like there?
Peace
Michael
|
8.96 | | SCOMAN::RUDMAN | The Posthumous Noter | Thu Nov 10 1988 17:26 | 6 |
| re: .81
Go ahead, put it in. Put an <FF> before it so we all have a choice.
After all, we survived the end of the world...
Don
|
8.97 | | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Fri Nov 11 1988 06:55 | 10 |
| Don,
I am not going to put that in here,because i feel that it is not
useful.I will say that it concerned the way in which he killed his
wife.It is something I dont like to think about,that is,knowing
how much evil exists around us.
Peace
Michael
|
8.98 | ARRRRRRGH! | BSS::BLAZEK | Dancing with My Self | Fri Nov 11 1988 09:33 | 5 |
| Then why not focus on the POSITIVE?! Man oh man I'm so tired
of these evil-obsessed people! Lighten up!
Carla
|
8.99 | I WANT TO SING | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Fri Nov 11 1988 12:23 | 21 |
| Carla,
I agree 100%,we need to focus on the positive,but,we need to know
about the negative,in order to survive.Unfortunately,there is so
much evil in the world,and,its getting worse.What are we to do?This
is my plea,from a song I wrote:
So lets turn away from anger and hate
face our fears and change our destiny
look towards tomorrow with faith and hope
a new age of peace and joy
copywrite 1988
I have learned from using the Ouija board,that,we have many challenges
to face,and,what i have learned could some day help to turn the
tide of evil.Knowing your foe and his activities is a good strategy.
Peace
Michael
|
8.100 | | STRATA::RUDMAN | The Posthumous Noter | Fri Nov 11 1988 12:39 | 9 |
| re: .97
O.K., Mike, thanks for the clarification. I wasn't interested
in the gory details; I thought it was a revelation which you
thought would blast our eyes. I always try to get as much data
as I can to base my opinions on.
Don
|
8.101 | Blind Ouija | DPDMAI::SWENSON | | Fri Nov 11 1988 17:22 | 7 |
| Has any one tried this. Blind fold everyone that sets at the Ouija
board. One person not setting at the board takes notes. The board
is placed on the table but those setting with it will not know how
it is facing. After the questions and answers see what the persons
who has taken notes has down. It seems this way if the Ouija board
is working there won't be any interferance from the people setting
there.
|
8.102 | I can't help myself....hee hee | FHQ::OGILVIE | The EYES have it! | Mon Nov 14 1988 10:52 | 9 |
| RE: 85 & 87
I can just see all of these little "spirits" standing next the the
Ouija Board assembly line, pointing their little "spirit" hands
at the board of their choice, saying: "that one is *mine*"....
8*) 8*) 8*)
Cheryl
|
8.103 | | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Mon Nov 14 1988 11:42 | 7 |
| Cheryl,
How did you know thats how they do it? :^)
Peace
Michael
|
8.104 | Stop being logical | DECWET::MITCHELL | The Cosmic Anchovy | Mon Nov 14 1988 18:44 | 6 |
| I think the blindfolded test is a good idea.
Really, why don't the spirits just move the planchette themselves?
John M.
|
8.105 | | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Tue Nov 15 1988 06:57 | 8 |
| I have tried being blindfolded while my wife read off the letters
to me.It didnt make any difference.I havnt yet tried having a third
party copy while we were both blindfolded.I think i will try this
and let you know what happens.
Peace
Michael
|
8.106 | The blindfold is a GREAT idea! | STRATA::RUDMAN | The Posthumous Noter | Tue Nov 29 1988 13:11 | 9 |
| In an early reply someone mentioned a "spirit" is assigned to each
board. The assembly line comment triggered something: In later
reply people have stated the firsts contact wasn't making sense
so a 2nd (or 3rd, etc.) "spirit" was requested. Also, I'm getting
the impression the "spirit" contacted has much to do with the person
operating the board. Very conflicting; or is it (d), All of the
above?
Don
|
8.107 | | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Wed Nov 30 1988 10:09 | 10 |
| I havnt been in contact on my board in the last few weeks.Some of
the things that my contact says just doesnt make logical sense,and,
i question it.However,when we talk about television to him,he doesnt
understand how all those things get in that small box.Just as it
is hard to explain television to him,its as hard for him to explain
his world to me.
Peace
Michael
|
8.108 | curious about the board. | NRADM::COLLETON | | Wed Nov 30 1988 17:59 | 7 |
| Mike,
Does your contact in the other world beleive he will return to
earth in a physical form? what is his (?) feelings or am I being
presumptious in assuming that you communicated with him (?) about
this. also can he be reached via another board just curious. can
any enity you wish to speak to be reached this way?
Bill-
|
8.109 | | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Thu Dec 01 1988 07:03 | 13 |
| Bill,
My contact says that you cannot return to the physical plane from
his plane,but,you can from higher levels than his.I have communicated
with him on another board.My contact says that if I wished to
communicate with someone it would be two possible ways,either directly
on the board,if the person is on his plane,or,by message,if they
are on a higher plane than his.I have communicated with family members
by both methods.
Peace
Michael
|
8.110 | | DECWET::MITCHELL | The Cosmic Anchovy | Thu Dec 01 1988 19:17 | 12 |
| RE: .107 (Michael)
> However,when we talk about television to him,he doesnt understand
how all those things get in that small box. <
But he does understand how to communicate through a ouija board.
That hound don't hunt.
John M.
|
8.111 | | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Fri Dec 02 1988 07:25 | 7 |
|
Yes,John,he does know how to communicate using the Ouija.I know
how to access this conference,but,dont ask me how it all works.
Peace
Michael
|
8.112 | recollections... | LEZAH::BOBBITT | follow your bliss | Fri Dec 02 1988 10:50 | 7 |
| I recall when we used our ouija board, there was a single spirit
through which we contacted all other spirits. He would "access
them" for us. I assumed that all ouija boards had a single spirit
that acted as a go-between, but I'm sure I could be wrong.
-Jody
|
8.113 | y | CTHULU::YERAZUNIS | Why are so few of us left healthy, active, and without personali | Fri Dec 02 1988 17:49 | 11 |
| In other words, there are spirits that act as network routers for
oujii boards?
Kind of like spiritual LATs? :-)
Brings a whole new meaning to $SET GHOST :-)
(sorry, couldn't resist. I blame it all on a goofy mood :-) )
-Bill
|
8.114 | cute | DECWET::MITCHELL | The Cosmic Anchovy | Fri Dec 02 1988 20:21 | 7 |
| RE: .113
"Set ghost." Hahahahahahaha!
What do these spirits do when not talking on the board?
John M.
|
8.115 | In the spirit of the moment. | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Mon Dec 05 1988 08:07 | 9 |
|
John,
When they are not on the board,they are having very spirited parties
;^) .
Peace
Michael
|
8.116 | Back to the future... | COMET::PINAR | | Tue Dec 06 1988 01:06 | 12 |
|
One of the dumbest things I ever did was asked a Ouja board
how old I was going to be when I died...I was only about 8 or
9 years old when I did it (I think my babysitter was playing
with it). Sure do regret it - because I don't think I"ll ever
be able to get that age out of my mind! Maybe I'll be senile
by that time ... ;') Oh well...I don't recommend asking
such a question to anyone else.
Bill P.
|
8.117 | | STRATA::RUDMAN | The Posthumous Noter | Thu Dec 08 1988 13:21 | 25 |
| re: .107
Mike, When you say he has trouble describing his world, is that
where he is now or where he was before? I'd say it would be easier
for you to understand his time on earth than he yours.
Which brings me to another thought: What is the percentage of spirits
communicated with ex-earthians? Or have they always been where they
are now, or did they come from someplace else?
Do they commute?
Maybe someone should suggest the spirits assign themselves to computer
boards instead of Ouija boards. :-)
The next time the spirit moves you (sorry), try a hand on the
keyboard and a hand on the Ouija board. If it can make a planchette
and 2 hands move it should be able to push keys. It can interpret
the words/letters on an O board so it should be able to do the same
for a keyboard and doesn't have to know how the computer puts
letters on the screen.
Just doing my bit to bring Spiritualism into the '80s. ;-)
Don
|
8.118 | | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Thu Dec 08 1988 15:29 | 12 |
| Don,
I meant that my contact has trouble decribing his spirit world in
a way that I could understand.He can describe his world on earth
and I can relate to it.All the spirits I have communicated with
all say they had an earthly life.Each one has a story to tell,and,
each story coincides with the time period that they lived,right
down to little details.
Peace
Michael
|
8.119 | | VITAL::KEEFE | Bill Keefe - 223-1837 - MLO21-4 | Fri Dec 09 1988 09:55 | 9 |
| re. 117 by STRATA::RUDMAN "The Posthumous Noter"
> Maybe someone should suggest the spirits assign themselves to
> computer boards instead of Ouija boards. :-)
Apparently, alot of them have done just that. Just look at all the
"channeled" books that are being published.
- Bill
|
8.120 | Remote Node Unavailable ;') | ELMAGO::AWILLETO | Beat those heathen drums... | Wed Mar 01 1989 12:48 | 9 |
| RE: <.113>
$ SET G*HOST LAUGHTER::SPIRITED
hahahahahaahahah!
T
|
8.121 | Knowledge please? | THOTH::SCHRAGER | | Wed Mar 01 1989 14:07 | 16 |
|
I am new to this note and enjoy it. I have a question concerning
something that was mention way back in this file. What is
"The Talent"? I have had my cards read a few times in the last
6 years, by 3 different readers, in 3 different areas and have been
told that I possess this "Talent". They have all suggested that
I pursue the Occult but to be very careful for evil is close.
I went to these card readers with an open mind, but I must say I'm
alittle concerned. I have been thinking about buying an Ouija board,
but do not wish a bad experience. I had few(what I would call)
pyschic experiences in my life, but these readers say its something
that I have not learned to tap into and in turn could be dangerous.
I guess I'm quite baffled by this and could use some guidence before
I embark on an Ouija board experience. Can anyone help?
K
|
8.122 | ouija - yes? Or no? | FNYFS::DONALDSON | Okay! The green *rabbit* leaps... | Fri Mar 03 1989 12:18 | 29 |
| Re: .121 THOTH::SCHRAGER - Knowledge please?
Well K, you haven't had a reply yet, so here's my
five pen'worth.
> What is "The Talent"?
I don't know. But, I would guess that in this context
it means some 'psychic ability'. How someone would know
this about you is another matter.
The person(s) who told you "you have 'The Talent' - but watch out"
should, I think, have given you a bit more advice than that.
> alittle concerned. I have been thinking about buying an Ouija board,
> but do not wish a bad experience. I had few(what I would call)
> pyschic experiences in my life, but these readers say its something
> that I have not learned to tap into and in turn could be dangerous.
> I guess I'm quite baffled by this and could use some guidence before
> I embark on an Ouija board experience. Can anyone help?
I would say get into this very carefully. Do some gentle meditation
(for example breath counting). Read some of the books
mentioned in this conference. Respect and consider your dreams.
And if you *still* want to dabble with something as quirky as
ouija - then go ahead, but read all the good advice about that
in this conference first.
John D.
|
8.123 | A SIMILAR EXPERIENCE | COGITO::MCMENIMAN | | Mon Mar 06 1989 15:49 | 33 |
| < Note 8.122 by FNYFS::DONALDSON "Okay! The green *rabbit* leaps..." >
-< ouija - yes? Or no? >-
Re: .121 THOTH::SCHRAGER - Knowledge please?
Well K, you haven't had a reply yet, so here's my
five pen'worth.
> What is "The Talent"?
I don't know. But, I would guess that in this context
it means some 'psychic ability'. How someone would know
this about you is another matter.
The person(s) who told you "you have 'The Talent' - but watch out"
should, I think, have given you a bit more advice than that.
> alittle concerned. I have been thinking about buying an Ouija board,
> but do not wish a bad experience. I had few(what I would call)
> pyschic experiences in my life, but these readers say its something
> that I have not learned to tap into and in turn could be dangerous.
> I guess I'm quite baffled by this and could use some guidence before
> I embark on an Ouija board experience. Can anyone help?
I would say get into this very carefully. Do some gentle meditation
(for example breath counting). Read some of the books
mentioned in this conference. Respect and consider your dreams.
And if you *still* want to dabble with something as quirky as
ouija - then go ahead, but read all the good advice about that
in this conference first.
John D.
|
8.124 | a very similar response | FNYFS::DONALDSON | Okay! The green *rabbit* leaps... | Wed Mar 08 1989 11:13 | 4 |
| Hi COGITO::MCMENIMAN, perhaps you'd like to have another
go at entering your reply - instead of mine! :-)
John D.
|
8.125 | GHOSTLY EXPERIENCES | PEKING::BECKC | | Thu Mar 09 1989 10:11 | 26 |
| I would like to report my experiences as far as spooks go etc,
spiritualism has been in my family for many years, but none of us
have really got in to it in depth, but I had one experience which
frightened me to death. I had gone to stay with some friends of
mine, we had gone to bed and like all girls together we got chatting
about this that and the other, anyway my friend put the light out
and we all settled for the night, but not me, I lay there and I
felt my whole body go very hot and then very cold, and I had this
feeling of being totally paralysed, so on when the light and my
friends thought that it could be the fact that I was laying between
twin beds and that there could be a draft, so I shared one there
beds, and sure enough as soon as the light went out it happened
again, only this time it was more intense, carolyn, who I was sharing
with couldn't believe the change in temperature on my body.
When I went home, I spoke to my grandfather about it, and he said
that what I had described was the feeling of a presence i.e. ghost,
I must admit it really did frighten me and it was along time before
I would go back to that house.
Anybody else have any similar experiences.
Regards
Chrissie
|
8.126 | Skeptic | NEATO::CAMHI | | Fri Mar 10 1989 15:21 | 8 |
| re .125
Not to make light, but I have had a similar experience--a fever.
Also happens during dizzy spells related to nervousness or after
over-exerting.
-Keith
|
8.127 | A changed skeptic | TYCOBB::TPSEC | Lynne S..A self confessed Noterholic | Wed Mar 15 1989 13:31 | 21 |
| Ok now I can say I read every single response. It is funny, I have
always been a skeptic of the weejee since it is sold in stores like
Toys 'r' Us, I always thought it was harmless. When I was young
I wanted my parents to buy me one, but they always told me it is
not good to dabble with the unknown. Still I was skeptical. Anyway
buy reading this notes file and reading all the other noters
experiences with the board...Now you all got me wondering, honest,
reading some of these experiences sent chills up my spine. A few
months ago my husband were in Caldor's Department we were in the
toy department and my husband had one in his hand....we both wanted
to buy it...though we were hesitant, and even though I was skeptical
about it, something inside of me said"Lynne don't...." I am glad
that I listened to that something inside...because after reading
all these responses, I have to admit, I would not even attempt to
purchase one...yes it is a frightening thing to dabble with, and
I do agree with all the others that say that it can be a dangerous
thing.
I admit I do believe,
Lynne S.
|
8.128 | Just wondering... | CSG::SCHOFIELD | | Mon Mar 27 1989 17:11 | 12 |
| Michael,
you said you 'spoke' with family members thru the weejee. I just
wondered... can you contact someone that doesn't want to be contacted?
Also, how would you go about contacting someone? I've never really
used the board (when I was about 12 we asked it which boys liked
us, etc, but not since then). I do have a family member I've though
about contacting, but am not sure if I really want to. What if I
find out something horrible.?
Thanks for any input you may have
Beth
|
8.129 | Does Management Advice Apply? | WMOIS::REINKE | S/W Manufacturing Technologies | Mon Mar 27 1989 17:34 | 6 |
| Re: -1
Dave Stone (now Digital VP in Europe) once suggested I should never ask
a question if I didn't want to hear the answer.
DR
|
8.130 | OUIGA HISTORY? | LOWRID::KELLEY | | Mon Apr 03 1989 12:39 | 7 |
|
I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW THE HISTORY OF THE OUIGA BOARD..ANYBODY GOT
ANYTHING ON THAT?
|
8.131 | Relatives | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Tue Apr 04 1989 12:22 | 13 |
| Hi Beth,
I just saw your note.I havnt been reading much here lately.It
isnt that easy to talk to relatives,especially if they are on higher
planes.You would then have to use your contact to attempt to find
them,which isnt easy either.I might have lucked out on the ones
I have had contact with.I have tried others on my wifes side and
mine,as well as a couple other people,but,have not been able to
get in touch with them.
Peace
Michael
|
8.132 | Wouldn't know where to start | CSG::SCHOFIELD | | Wed Apr 05 1989 17:35 | 7 |
| Thanks Michael,
I guess it wouldn't be that easy. Just as well, I'm kind of scared
of using the Ouija anyway. I don't know enough.
Thanks,
Beth
|
8.133 | | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Sat Apr 08 1989 10:51 | 10 |
|
Beth,
It can be scary,it has at times with my experiences,but,probably
no more than what the first explorers from Europe,or,the first time
astronauts venture into space.Life is an adventure for us all.Take
care.
Michael
|
8.134 | | CSG001::SCHOFIELD | | Mon Apr 10 1989 17:22 | 6 |
| Thanks Michael, maybe when I find someone who knows a bit more and
is experienced (none of my friends - that I know of- are much on
this) I will try it. I'd like to learn more. But don't think I should
fool around with it on my own. Thanks, I'll let you know if anything
comes up (or anyone!!!) 8-)
Beth
|
8.135 | WHERE CAN I GET ONE? | SUBURB::ABSOLOMT | | Fri May 19 1989 13:43 | 18 |
| Over the last three years I have used the oujia board on many
occasions. The problem being, I don't have a real board. My
friends and I use a round table & pieces of paper. I have been
told that it must be at least two or three people, is this true?
Is this the case when using a real board ?
On one occasion when on holiday last year we were with people
we'd met there. They wanted to join in, so we said o.k. We con-
tacted a boy who they used to go to school with. By the end, all
four lads were crying openly because of what they had experienced.
It was the most convincing experience of oujia I have had.
Finally, is it true that it is very dangerous to use the oujia
for financial gain, i.e "What will win the Derby" ?
Also, can anybody tell me WHERE I can get a ouija board in
England.
Also will it work if I do it on my own
TONY ABSOLOM
RDL, QUEENS HOUSE, READING, ENGLAND
|
8.136 | Probably whereever you can get "Monopoly" | CADSYS::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Fri May 19 1989 15:41 | 21 |
| 1. There is nothing "magic" that the manufacturer does, so I see no
difference whether or not it is homemade. Of course, the easier your
"planchette" slips over the surface the better.
2. I don't believe that it is any more dangerous to do it for money,
but some operators find that the "spirits" are likely to be resistant
or cagey about such information. Also there is no reason to suppose
that they will be particularly reliable.
3. Have no idea where you can get it in England, but the manufacturer
is Parker Brothers (in the U.S.) Check at the library and see if they
have British offices or affiliates.
4. People generally find that it is much harder to work the board with
one operator than with two. It is not impossible, particularly if you
have some practice working with other operators.
5. This is your decision, but there have been many warnings posted in
this conference. You should read them and think about them.
Topher
|
8.137 | Toys | CECV03::US_ES_ADMIN | | Fri May 19 1989 18:35 | 7 |
|
Ouija Boards are found in toy stores or the toy section in a department
store. They are usually found with games.
Joanne
|
8.138 | One more warning | SSDEVO::YOUNGER | Spring is the time of the Maiden | Fri May 19 1989 18:41 | 21 |
| Re .135
I've said this in here before, and I'll go through this again.
OUIJA BOARDS ARE DANGEROUS! Even in the case that you experienced,
you have no way of knowing that it really was your school friend
you contacted, or if it was a good imitation. Some of these beings
are very nasty to deal with and to get out of your life. There
are other means to be sure of who you're contacting, and Ouija,
especially when viewed as a parlor game, has none of these safety
features. It's essentially the same things as living in an inner-city
tough neighborhood, and opening your door at midnight Saturday night,
hoping to find someone interesting to visit with. You might get
someone nice, you might get a serial murderer. You're doing the
same thing in the spiritual realm.
As for money, I suppose it would be a little more dangerous when
using it for money, as spirits who have a high interest in greed
tend to be worse than the "general" crowd.
Elizabeth
|
8.139 | mirrors behind the shades | USACSB::CBROWN | jus gotta'get use to it | Mon May 22 1989 05:51 | 26 |
|
I dont know bout dis.
It would seem to me that a spirit would have to be close to
a person already if something like a ouija board were to be
effective.
Or some emotional stress / vibration would have to be present
to manifest such a result.
In either case there is a spirit/energy showing itself that
was there all along. Are these boards simply tools that tell us
what is in the static around us? Possibly trying to get into our
conscious? Spirits or emotional energies manifesting from without
for our own ease in handeling or expressing them? Energies that we
have drawn to ourselves?
Certainly in learning to like, accept and love ourselves we have
drawn energies that could have taken the form of "shady charictors"
;-) Is it possible that we have drawn or created these images from
ourselves and only use the board to glimps them? When we look through
the board do we see ourself? and our own creations/vibrations of our
own energies returning as an echo from the deep?
Can they possibly be of any more danger than we are to ourselves
already? ;-)
|
8.140 | thoughts | LESCOM::KALLIS | Anger's no replacement for reason. | Mon May 22 1989 09:08 | 41 |
| re .139 (CB):
>It would seem to me that a spirit would have to be close to
>a person already if something like a ouija board were to be
>effective.
>
>Or some emotional stress / vibration would have to be present
>to manifest such a result.
Well, assume you're out in the desert, weak from lack of thirst,
and as you crawl along the sands, vultures start circling overhead.
Seems that, using the observation, the vultures would have had to
be close to you or they'd never appear....
Any "I'm available" vibration, including an emotional turmoil, might
be enough to attract spiritual predators or scavengers.
>In either case there is a spirit/energy showing itself that
>was there all along. ...
See above anent vultures.
>Certainly in learning to like, accept and love ourselves we have
>drawn energies that could have taken the form of "shady charictors"
>;-) Is it possible that we have drawn or created these images from
>ourselves and only use the board to glimps them? When we look through
>the board do we see ourself? and our own creations/vibrations of our
>own energies returning as an echo from the deep?
That's one possibility. Another is that we're "tuning into" the
shasdes of the departed (even then, you couldn't be sure whether
it was _really_ the spirit you were after). A third is that some
other kind of supernatural entity is masquerading as a shade, and
not to the benefit of the person "calling."
>Can they possibly be of any more danger than we are to ourselves
>already? ;-)
Without the smiley face, yes.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
8.141 | :-)))))))) | USACSB::CBROWN | jus gotta'get use to it | Mon May 22 1989 09:30 | 45 |
|
RE .140 Steve E.
> Well, assume you're out in the desert, weak from lack of thirst,
> and as you crawl along the sands, vultures start circling overhead.
> Seems that, using the observation, the vultures would have had to
> be close to you or they'd never appear....
I dont know if I understand. If I was in an emotional/psycological
desert I would expect to see vultures. I again have placed myself
in the desert... I have started the vibration by placeing myself
there.. arn't the vultures a return of my innitial vibration of
my mental/sprititual/emotional state?
A GOOD ADVERTISEMENT FOR FOLKS GETTING SOME COUNSELING ECT IF
SERIOUSLY CONSIDERING RESEARCH IN THIS AREA.
> Any "I'm available" vibration, including an emotional turmoil, might
> be enough to attract spiritual predators or scavengers.
I again think it depends on the enviornment one is in personally.
predators should always be watched and respected however we can
deal with them if we ar physically and mentally fit...... another
good advertisement....
> That's one possibility. Another is that we're "tuning into" the
> shasdes of the departed (even then, you couldn't be sure whether
> it was _really_ the spirit you were after). A third is that some
> other kind of supernatural entity is masquerading as a shade, and
> not to the benefit of the person "calling."
possibly. However if one truly has an intrest to do such things
and takes things slowly and doubtfully ;-) it will possibly lead
to a degree of self realization. Of course there are risks... some
of which make it fun.
> >Can they possibly be of any more danger than we are to ourselves
> >already? ;-)
> Without the smiley face, yes.
ALWAYS WITH the smiley face... heaven forbid we take these things
we dont understand seriously!! ;-)
Craig
|
8.142 | DID YOU KNOW? | SUBURB::ABSOLOMT | | Tue May 23 1989 12:15 | 0 |
8.143 | | USACSB::CBROWN | jus gotta'get use to it | Wed May 24 1989 08:23 | 7 |
|
> RE .140 Steve E.
?!?!? I havn't the slightest idea where the "E." came from Steve.
The "E" isn't even close to the "K" on the keyboard.
Sorry... I dont know what got in to me. ;-)
|
8.144 | | AKOV13::BOWERS | | Thu May 25 1989 13:22 | 58 |
| Finally! I've just read through this entire note. I'm wondering
several things...I recall using a Ouija board as a child (can't
remember the age exactly). I used it with several friends, and
even though we followed the instructions, none of us could ever
get ANY response. When I tried, nothing happened at all. Over
the years I had forgotten about it, until reading this note.
I've always been fascinated by the paranormal, but growing up strict
Catholic, that subject was severely frowned upon. The entire group
of us were all same religion...could that have had an effect on
things? We were all "God fearing" at that time. Since then, many
things have changed for me...and I've had interesting experiences
with a card reader and a channelor. (sorry, about to go somewhat
offtrack) Both of these women (who don't know each other) and who
did readings a year and a half apart, told me the same things...things
which no one else could know. They both told me that I have "the
talent" as well. The channelor was a woman I met through work,
who made it her business to meet me, get to know me and after enough
time had gone by, to tell me that she was the only psychic who would
"come forward to me" because she "had a message". I admit at the
time, I was a skeptic. She used a crystal ball to channel the spirit,
who was with me for nearly two hours. I was so amazed by what he/she
was saying, it never occured to me to ask anything about who it
was. What did happen was that I was convinced
for ever more. The spirit told me things to verify that I would
believe, very personal things from my childhood that I've never
shared with anyone.
After the 'believing lessons' the advice came. To make a long story
short, I was told that this was the only psychic that would ever
come forward, that from now on I must search. The search would
help me to develop and overcome problems which I was having at the
time. And that focus on 'higher' thoughts would help me not to
'dwell' on current/past problems.
This first time I took notes, and have refered to them many times.
Searching for my next contact was something I never considered,
just thought was interesting. About a year and a half later, I
happened upon an ad for psychic readings done at the Psychic Learning
Center in Salem. I had no reason to take an interest in the ad,
so I ignored it. Over time, I kept finding it and re-reading it
until I eventually called. The woman did over-the-phone readings
or in person (I chose phone) using Tarot cards. She did an hour-long
reading, which I found to be unbelievable because she told some
of the same 'secrets' that the first woman knew about...that no
one else still knew. She also told me many things about my abilities,
so what I am wondering (thanks all for reading on...and on) is:
I am getting the same feeling about Ouija that I had about going
back to the ad again and again. I really don't have anyone who
would seriously try it with me though, so does anyone have any advice?
If you have the 'talent' is it better/worse to use the board? Should
I leave well enough alone? Michael, I hoped you would be able to
shed some light on my questions. I am a believer, but very afraid
of experiences going awry.
|
8.145 | | AKOV13::BOWERS | | Thu May 25 1989 13:24 | 5 |
| RE: .144
I forgot to sign that last one...it's
Nancy
|
8.146 | | AKOV13::BOWERS | | Thu May 25 1989 17:09 | 18 |
| I've been thinking about this some more (non-stop) and have a few
more questions for those of you well-versed in the subject.
One note mentioned a reference to 'once you've let a spirit 'in',
it may be hard to get it 'out' of your life'...how do you suppose
this could be possible? It seems that the spirit could only speak
to you through the board, and if you were disturbed by it, the solution
would be not to use the board again. Also, would using a different
board make a difference? Could a spirit 'haunt' you, in dreams,
thoughts, or some other way that I am unaware of?
Also, could someone please tell me a little about 'Wicca'? I keep
hearing the name only, but no reference to what the term means.
Some type of witchcraft?
Regards,
Nancy
|
8.147 | | NEXUS::MORGAN | Celebrating the Cybernetic Age. | Thu May 25 1989 17:49 | 15 |
|
Re: < Note 8.146 by AKOV13::BOWERS >
>Also, could someone please tell me a little about 'Wicca'? I keep
>hearing the name only, but no reference to what the term means.
>Some type of witchcraft?
Yeah? What do you want to know? There's Wicca and Craft which are
joined to form WiccaCraft which became Witchcraft. This is the American
flavor of course. B^)
Try reading _Drawing Down the Moon_ by Margo Adler or _Spiral_Dance_
by Starhawk. You can probably find them in your public library though
they are usually always checked out. B^) Most retail bookstores
have them.
|
8.148 | better to never attract their attention; | SSDEVO::ACKLEY | Mediumfoot | Thu May 25 1989 18:17 | 35 |
| RE: Note 8.146 AKOV13::BOWERS Nancy,
> One note mentioned a reference to 'once you've let a spirit 'in',
> it may be hard to get it 'out' of your life'...how do you suppose
> this could be possible? It seems that the spirit could only speak
> to you through the board, and if you were disturbed by it, the solution
> would be not to use the board again. Also, would using a different
> board make a difference? Could a spirit 'haunt' you, in dreams,
> thoughts, or some other way that I am unaware of?
Having read many accounts of such things, it appears that
spirits will follow people around, sometimes. People who
move into a haunted house may move to escape then found that
the haunt has followed them. (as in the Amityville Horror story)
I recently read about a man who was involved with a succubus,
the legendary type of female demon who materializes to have sex with
some man. She began to dominate his life, wanting him every
single night, so he moved from Europe to Canada to escape, but
she was still with him when he got to Canada.
It appears that such creatures (if they do in fact exist
as separate creatures, and are not just psychological projections,
which would be *expected* to follow one around) may be a little
like people, in that they follow what arouses their interest.
Thus one danger of the Ouija is that a link is formed that flags
the attention of those 'on the other side'. Once they 'have your
number' they may not be willing to forget. It could be harder
than keeping out harrassing phone calls, since you can change your
phone number, but it may be really hard to block out something
that accesses your mind directly. How would you get a persistent
suitor to let you alone? How much harder would it be if the
suitor was not visible to the naked eye, and could walk through
walls?
Alan.
|
8.149 | WHO KNOWS? | SUBURB::ABSOLOMT | | Fri May 26 1989 14:10 | 13 |
| DID YOU KNOW?
OUIJA BOARDS ARE ILLEGAL IN THE U.K?
THEY SUPPOSED TO BE PASSED ONLY WITHIN THE FAMILY?
ANYONE HEARD OF SPIRIT CODES?
ANYONE HEARD OF SPIRIT LEVELS? (i.e 1-6)
ANYONE HEARD OF THE POWER OF THE WHITE LIGHT?
HAS ANYONE SPOKE TO AN IMMEDIATE MEMBER OF FAMILY,DECEASED OF COURSE?
DOES ANYONE THINK THEY HAVE CONVERSED WITH THE BIG "D"?
TONY ABSOLOM, RDL, SPOOKSVILLE, U.K
|
8.150 | This could turn into a rathole for the topic | LESCOM::KALLIS | Anger's no replacement for reason. | Fri May 26 1989 15:07 | 44 |
| Re .149 (Tony):
Please don't use all caps (SHOUTING); it's harder to read.
>OUIJA BOARDS ARE ILLEGAL IN THE U.K?
Really? Do you happen to know why?
>ANYONE HEARD OF SPIRIT LEVELS? (i.e 1-6)
Yes. Carpenters and bricklayers use them to determine when things
are truly horizontal or vertical. A fluid is put into a small curved
tube, and it has a bubble in it; when the bubble is between two
marks, the ends of the tube are level (usually the tube is mounted
in a holder); advanced versions of this, with multiple tubes (usually
3-4) can determine whether things are vertical as well as horizontal.
>ANYONE HEARD OF THE POWER OF THE WHITE LIGHT?
Depends upon whom you talk to. A lot of people visualize "white
light" as a spiritually cleansing agent, or as a form of protection.
Opinions vary on what might constitute "the White Light," and it's
not clear that there's a single thing that can be singled out as
"the" White Light.
Light, itself, is frequently thought of as "good" as opposed to
darkness as "evil"; thus, Satan, for example, is called "the Prince
of Darkness" to illustrate his evil nature. A person who's come
to knowledge is said to be "enlightened," and an erring person brought
to his or her senses is said to have "seen the light." However,
there are ambiguities; for instance a (or the) chief devil is known
as Lucifer, meaning "light-bearer."
>DOES ANYONE THINK THEY HAVE CONVERSED WITH THE BIG "D"?
By that, am I correct is assuming you're asking whether anyone thinks
he or she has had a run-in with a devil? Perhaps Satan?
A question of this sort can be entered frivolously, seriously, or
confrontationally. I doubt that there is a person in this Conference
who would welcome, or even seek out, a conversation with any sort
of devil, much less the leader of the host of Infernus.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
8.151 | Stamped Addressed Envolope! | SUBURB::ABSOLOMT | | Wed May 31 1989 07:59 | 13 |
| O.K ,
Can anyone in the good ol' U.S of A tell me how i can purchase
a board from America?
There must be a company who makes them who has a mailing service.
If anyone has any information ( telephone numbers, addresses etc.
I would be very grateful,
TONY ABSOLOM
|
8.152 | | USACSB::CBROWN | I switched to Maxwell House | Wed May 31 1989 08:18 | 16 |
|
RE .151
Well there is only A company that makes them... Parker Brothers.
I was interested to hear that the UK doesn't have them. There
is an economy store by me that brought a whole bunch of them
and is selling them for about 8 dollars each. I was thinking
of doing my holloween shopping early and bying a gross
to cover me for christmass and all the major holidays. ;-)
I will see if they have a mail order thing going. This may
sound stupid.... but is there any law agains sending one overseas?
I doubt it... but laws is screwing things some times.
Craig ;-)
|
8.153 | MY EXPERIENCE | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Wed May 31 1989 08:32 | 20 |
|
I have been at training the last couple of weeks,so,had some catching
up to do.Nancy,I believe,that,being able to use the Ouija board,is
an indication of a talent.It is preliminary to channeling.The energy
required to operate the Ouija is less than what is required to channel.
My wife and I have worked the board for about 3 years now.I have
wrote of some of our experiences throughout this conference.I donot
plan to try channeling,because,I see it as very risky.You dont really
know who,or,what,you are dealing with.To "open" the door for unknown
entities by inviting them in,is taking a big chance.
Tony,I have had conversations with my first wife directly on the
Ouija.I also have sent and received messages from my father,who,is
on a higher plane,and,cannot communicate directly.I also have had
conversations(not solicited)with an entity that claimed to be Satan.
He wanted me to know that He was in charge,and,that I had no power
over him.
Peace
Michael
|
8.154 | PARKER GAMES?-WHERE ARE THEY? | SUBURB::ABSOLOMT | | Wed May 31 1989 12:02 | 9 |
|
Cheers Craig,
Could you,or,anyone else supply me with a number for PARKERS in
the U.S. I would be eternally grateful!!
This would be much appreciated, PLEASE,PLEASE,PLEASE.
TONY AB. RDL
|
8.155 | It's like dialing random phone numbers | BSS::RJONES | Sow there! | Wed May 31 1989 12:44 | 15 |
| One of the most incredibly mystical (and spooky) experiences
I had in my life was with a group of friends and an Ouija board.
We contacted a entity who called him/herself simply "Friend". He/She
said his/her function was to influence dreams. I don't remember
all the details, but I remember we all accused each other of moving
the "pointer", and of course, we all denied it. So we had all who
were touching the pointer look away from the board and each other,
and an observer wrote down the messages. The spirit still spoke
coherently; which we were having trouble doing ;-).
Other times since I have witnessed visitations by darker spirits; full
of lies and contradictions.
Richard
|
8.156 | ENERGY FIELDS | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Wed May 31 1989 13:15 | 13 |
| Richard,
My wife and I have experimented by having our son take down
the letters while we were both looking away from the board and each
other.It didnt make any difference.I have been told that it is caused
by vibrations in the hand,but,we hardly touch the pointer,and,at
times,it moved from under my hand until the contact was broken.I
believe it operates by energy not yet detectable by scientists,and,
by using more than one person,increases the energy by combining
each persons energy fields.
Peace
Michael
|
8.157 | Address for Parker Brothers | CADSYS::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Wed May 31 1989 14:05 | 15 |
| From The National Directory of Addresses and Telephone Numbers, 1987
edition from the DEC Hudson (Mass.) library:
Parker Brothers and Co. Inc.
5303 Navigation
Houston, Texas 77011-1025
(713)926-4461
I'm sure that they *must* have a British subsidiary or associate --
they are the largest manufacturer of board games in the world. As well
as Ouija they own Monopoly, Risk and Ping-Pong (every one else sells
"Table Tennis").
Topher
|
8.158 | Ouija tests. | CADSYS::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Wed May 31 1989 14:30 | 62 |
| RE: .156
Michael, that test signifies nothing, though your open mindedness in
testing competing hypotheses does you credit. Subconscious
"touch-typing" is way to easy for an experienced user of the board and
peripheral vision could help a great deal with the way you did it.
To be meaningful:
1) All operators would have to be completely blindfolded.
2) The board would have to be *randomly* reoriented after
blindfolding and before the hands are placed on the planchette
and again frequently throughout the session.
3) Any time a hand, wrist, arm, etc. or the planchette came in
contact with the edge of the board it would have to be
reoriented (*randomly*) again. Alternately a special circular
board could be used.
4) The person taking down the results should give absolutly no
feedback as to what is going on. Much better would be to use
a video camera and simply record the session.
The light touch is as expected (the Ouija board is carefully designed
to only require a light touch) as is the moving away from your fingers.
What would be surprising is significant movement after it has left
contact with everyones fingers.
The ball-bearing test can be definitive. Place some ball bearings on
the planchette and immobalize them with modeling clay (the clay should
not come between the ball-bearing and the planchette nor cover the top
of the ball-bearings). Place a second surface (piece of plastic or
stiff cardboard) on top of the ball-bearings and operate the board.
If it does not "work" at this point the test is inconclusive since
there is an adequate explanation within both theories: either the
ball-bearings/extra-surface insulates the "psychic energy" or the
operators are subconsciously blocking the procedure either because they
believe that the "psychic energy" will be blocked or because of a
subconscious fear of a definitive test.
Now remove the clay so the ball bearings can roll freely. The
"subconscious movements" theory predicts one of two things will then
occur when an attempt is made to operate the board:
1) Nothing noticable will happen since the feedback loop which
directs the small movements into consistent macroscopic
movements is broken, or
2) The planchette will stay in place while the extra surface
moves around a bit and possibly slides off.
The "unknown energy" theory predicts:
3) The planchette will slide out from beneath the ball-bearings.
Note that many occultists believe that the board is moved by small
movements of the hands which are directed through the subconscious
by discorporeal entities -- essentially that the board is an easy
and limited form of channeling.
Topher
|
8.159 | BUT TOPHER ;^) | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Wed May 31 1989 16:24 | 20 |
|
Topher,
I guess,in the scientists point of view,the test would not be
of any validity,which after reading your reply,I could see your
points.However,I still hold to the theory of Energy Fields.I know
there are many things we are not aware of,I believe this is one
area we are in the dark.I think the energy is connected with the
Aura,and,comes from our spirit body.Of course,it is only a theory.
I dont think scientists will get proof,if the proof will not be
given.I challenged my contact to use one of his other boards,and,give
the person on the other end my phone number,a code word,and for
that person to call me,with the code word,and my contacts name.He
has not yet accomplished it,because I dont believe they are allowed
to offer proof of it.I would think it would be pretty convincing.
Thanks for the scientific process,an area I have limited knowledge.
Peace
Michael
|
8.160 | into the rabbit hole? | LESCOM::KALLIS | Anger's no replacement for reason. | Wed May 31 1989 17:05 | 25 |
| Re .158 m(Topher):
> 3) Any time a hand, wrist, arm, etc. or the planchette came in
> contact with the edge of the board it would have to be
> reoriented (*randomly*) again. Alternately a special circular
> board could be used.
Alternatively, the board could be either painted in a large surface
(such as the table) which is movable, or it could be under glass
so the operators cannot feel an edge.
>Note that many occultists believe that the board is moved by small
>movements of the hands which are directed through the subconscious
>by discorporeal entities -- essentially that the board is an easy
>and limited form of channeling.
This brings us full circle. If we assume that the subconscious
is responsible for moving the planchette, than it could be:
a) channeled entities (ghosts, demons, whatever)
b) a secondary personality
c) a manifestation of a paranormal talent (e.g., clairvoyance) detected
by the subconscious.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
8.161 | Curiouser and Curiouser. | CADSYS::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Wed May 31 1989 18:19 | 16 |
| RE: .160 (Steve K.)
> Alternatively, the board could be either painted in a large surface
> (such as the table) which is movable, or it could be under glass
> so the operators cannot feel an edge.
The glass is a good idea, if it does not interfere (via "insulation" or
psychological mechanisms) with the boards working "in the clear"
(without blindfold). The table doesn't really help matters -- unless
it is circular (in which case it is the "special circular board" with
legs) -- since it would be too easy for the operators to learn
something about the orientation by contact of the table edge with their
bodies. A table-sized circular board would eliminate the tendency of
the planchette to fall off the edge in a blindfold test.
Topher
|
8.162 | Had to indulge myself... | BTOVT::BEST_G | Ghost of the Aragon | Wed May 31 1989 22:17 | 14 |
|
Okay, how about a painted glass table that's round and *motorized* to
turn constantly with a randomly varying speed within certain limits,
or we could, instead of paint, also have the letters moving randomly,
by using lasers. Then house the entire set-up (with room inside for
the participants and an observer) in a giant molybdenum steel ball that
rotates at .005 Hz and randomly aligns itself with either the position
of the sun or with Mrs. Hazel Farcus' rhubard (also selected randomly).
Then we could house all of this in a warehouse where various other
random events are taking place - I don't know why, but random events
just seem like good things to have around test environments. :-)
Guy
|
8.163 | Sorry, we don't stock those. | SUBURB::ABSOLOMT | | Thu Jun 01 1989 07:53 | 16 |
| RE:8.157
Topher,
The British side of Parker Bros. don't sell boards. Although
they are not illegal in this country, they are ilegal to make.
There are alot of funny laws in this country.For instance,
the Prime Minister is allowed to drive sheep over London bridge!!!
I wish someone would drive the Prime Minister over London bridge
TONY ABSOLOM, ENGLAND.
P.S Frank Bruno nearly knocked out Iron Mike.
|
8.164 | | WAGON::DONHAM | I'll see it when I believe it. | Thu Jun 01 1989 15:27 | 6 |
|
Hmm...has anyone tried using two boards to set up a communication
link? Pick a text or idea at random and try to "send" it to the
second board which is at some remote location.
Perry
|
8.165 | Fascinated!!!! | BREW11::GRIFFITHS | | Fri Jun 02 1989 12:18 | 41 |
| I havn't read all of the replies but most of them - thought I'd
add my thoughts (this is all new to me..)
When I was about 7 I can remember watching my mum, sister and friends
sitting around a table talking to people through a glass. I found
it absolutely fascinating , and was drawn in some kind of way?
In later years I decided to ask my mum what had been going on -
she explained it very briefly, but that it was not something that
should be done, and that she regretted it very much.
I decided when I was about 15 to have a go with some friends one
evening very late, I was taking the whole situation very seriously,
but my friends were not. Something did happen though the glass
began to move - it appeared to be very angry and the glass shattered
into pieces. My friends left and I was left to ponder.
About 4 years after that incident I eventually persuaded my mum
and sister to indulge me and we began. We lit a candle and the
atmosphere was very tense. The first ?spirit? that announced itself
claimed to be my Grandmother - and described a a lot of things about
me (that I certainly hadn't told my mother - nor did I want her
to know!!). That spirit left suddenly - and it seemed to be very
upset. The second spirit to announce itself began to ask us to
pass messages onto living members of its family i.e. tell Karen
if she doesn't get her act together I'll have to sort her out.
We never did find out who Karen was. The third was quite dreadful,
and actually threatened us with violence. We all became very
frightened (during the whole of the this time the candle was going
crazy and eventually blew out). My mother threatened myself and
my sister not to let go of the glass, otherwise dreadful things
would happen, we had to ask the spirit to leave the room. We did,
and eventually it did.
I later went to discuss these happenings with friend who was a psychic
(who had previously told me I had the power???) and she warned me
against dabbling with things so sensitive. Reading some of the
notes - I now know why. I'm still fascinated though.
And am enjoying DEJAVU enourmasly!!!!!!!
Sarah
|
8.166 | YACHI DA | SUBURB::ABSOLOMT | | Fri Jun 02 1989 13:27 | 19 |
| HOORA & BALYHOO!!
I have finally contacted Parker Brothers, Massachussetts. They were
quite happy to give me all the information I needed.
It will cost me $18.10 post & package, and $13.00 for the actual
board. I found it curious that a company that, by law, cannot sell
these items in this country, are willing to sell them by mail order.
Hopefully I will be able to add more contributions to this conference
now.
By the way, do any of you moguls know if you can use a real board
on your own?????
!!!!!!! I NEED TO KNOW THIS!!!!!!!
Cheers chaps,
TONY ABSOLOM, RDL, ENGLAND.
|
8.167 | I WISH I were! | CADSYS::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Fri Jun 02 1989 13:36 | 13 |
| RE: .166 (Tony Absolom)
Well, last time I checked I wasn't a mogul (i.e., a rich and powerful
person), but the answer to your question is -- maybe.
Some people can use the OUIJA alone, most can't. Some people who can't
initially, find that they can after they've had group experience for
awhile.
Good luck with the board, and be carefull -- even skeptics believe that
OUIJA boards can cause problems.
Topher
|
8.168 | IT'S FRIDAY NIGHT | SUBURB::ABSOLOMT | | Fri Jun 02 1989 14:25 | 8 |
| RE: .167 (Topher)
Can you?
T.A.
|
8.169 | It's Friday afternoon. | CADSYS::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Fri Jun 02 1989 14:50 | 16 |
| RE: .168 (T.A.)
I've never tried. I've only used the board a dozen or so times. My
knowledge is principally from less immediate sources: casual
conversations and more "formal" interviews with users of all levels of
experience, some observations of sessions and lots of reading on
this and related subjects.
You might want to experiment with the "pendulum" before you spend
money on the "board". Its clumsier and less spectacular, but most
people can do it by themselves, and it appears to be less dangerous
(perhaps because it provides such a "narrow", clumsy communication
channel). There are directions from several people elsewhere in this
conference.
Topher
|
8.170 | HOGGING THE SPACE | SUBURB::ABSOLOMT | | Fri Jun 02 1989 14:59 | 21 |
| RE: 21. "WINNING MEGABUCKS"
Now don't get me wrong, (Steve,Topher!), I wouldn't attempt this
as I've been told it is dangerous.
Has anyone ever used the board to make money? If not why not.
A friend of mine once asked a 'spirit' what was going to win a race.
The horse duly won.
The curious thing being, he hadn't seen what was running in the
race, and so there for couldn't have urged the board to tell him
this particular horse's name.
Fevered with excitement he asked again later on, the "spirit"
answered. Only this time it lost.
Obviously you cannot trust everything a "spirit" says, but do have
knowledge of such future occurences? If so, how?
Answers in plain,(and I mean plain), English please.
TONY ABSOLOM ,RDL,ENGLAND.
|
8.171 | A MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE | SUBURB::ABSOLOMT | | Fri Jun 09 1989 08:29 | 6 |
|
WAS IT SOMETHING I SAID?
|
8.172 | a question with countless answers | USACSB::CBROWN | did you think you were pure? | Fri Jun 09 1989 08:40 | 10 |
|
I dont think it was something you said.. your last question was
something like...
"Do spirits have knowledge of future events and if so...how?"
How can anyone even start to list the possible answers? all of
which could.. and most likely are.... wrong.
Craig
|
8.173 | WHICH FLOOR | SUBURB::ABSOLOMT | | Fri Jun 09 1989 13:19 | 15 |
| Once when myself and a few 'friends' were using the board they asked
questions which were weird.
We asked if we were going to heaven or hell. The board informed
us that three of us were going to heaven, and three to hell. We
then asked,(those of us who were going to hell!), whether it was
something we had already done, the answer, no. Now, I didn't want
to know what I was going to do, but my friends did. The first one
asked why he was going down, the board spelt out, H.I.T.A.N.D.R.U.N
This is when
|
8.174 | RE: 173 | SUBURB::ABSOLOMT | | Fri Jun 09 1989 13:26 | 12 |
|
RE: 173
< This is when...>
This is when I decided these were not good questions.
Now this is the weird bit, the headlines in the next days paper
(Daily Mirror, 5/7/88,) were, HIT AND RUN KILLINGS.
Now thats weird.
Tony Ab.
|
8.175 | Time to get out the good ole Monopoly board.... | WITNES::FUNK | send all inquiries to xibita::mm_temp | Fri Jun 09 1989 14:21 | 11 |
|
re: 173 & 174
Did your friend who asked why he was going to hell have a good
alibi at the time of the hit-and-runs?
Or do you suspect him.....?
(I agree those were not good questions!)
/Greg Aharonian
|
8.176 | Response, fwiw | AIRPRT::PAINTER | Back from OZ, and the Wizard said... | Fri Jun 09 1989 14:54 | 14 |
|
Re.170-1 (Absolom)
Tony,
>Was it something I said?
Yes indeed. You asked for...
>Answers in plain, (and I mean plain), English please.
Nobody felt up to the task that particular day! (;^)
Cindy
|
8.177 | ? | SUBURB::GLOVERP | I'll have a Tanglefoot | Thu Jun 29 1989 09:15 | 12 |
| Tony Absolom,this is your future speaking.......:->
Alex Rex will win the 2.30 at Newbury on the 6th July,Christine
Marsh is also a good each-way bet................
You will not go to hell,rather you will be banished to an eternity
in death park..........
your jp&r will be twarted by the introduction of giles newth as
cmo controller........
PHil........
|
8.178 | Never again! | WMOIS::D_OCONNOR | | Thu Jun 29 1989 18:34 | 15 |
| WHen I was a teenager my best friend and I used the board everyday
for about 6 months. We asked all the typical questions (99% of
the answers came through). Both my friend and myself came from
very religious upbring. One day we asked it (I'm starting to get
the creeps) when the answers came from and the board responded "satan
the devil." Well we were getting pretty spooked by this itme but
continued to ask it questions relating to biblical facts. This
is not lie - the pointer started moving rapidly all by itself.
We finally flipped out when we asked it if it believed in Jesus
the pointed spelled out "F U" all by itself and the pointer was
then into the ceiling and the board was flung across the room.
We never ever touched another board again. The feeling both of
us had was sheer terror. I will never in my life ever go near one
again. Just needed to share this.
|
8.179 | Sorry about the typos | WMOIS::D_OCONNOR | | Thu Jun 29 1989 18:36 | 5 |
| Just read my reponse and didn't realize all the bad feelings that
were coming thought again. However looking at all the typos and
spelling errors I realized it is still difficult to even address
that experience.
DOC
|
8.180 | Response | AIRPRT::PAINTER | Celebrate life! | Fri Jun 30 1989 14:01 | 9 |
| Re.178/9 (OConnor)
Thanks for entering that.
It's never a good idea to play around with high voltage when you
have no idea what it's all about. If you choose to though, then
it's wise to be properly educated and protected beforehand.
Cindy
|
8.181 | More details if you wish to supply them. | CADSYS::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Fri Jun 30 1989 14:24 | 46 |
| RE: .178 (D_OCONNOR)
Thank you for sharing that, it was obviously difficult for you, and
I appreciate it (I suspect rather strongly that others in this
conference do to). I have some questions, but it is perfectly OK
if you do not wish to answer, or wish to answer privately via MAIL.
1) I assume that the "religious upbringing" for both your friend and
you was Christian. Correct?
2) What part of the world did you grow up in?
3) What do you mean when yousay that the pointer moved "all by itself?"
Do you means your hands were not in contact with it when this occured?
Or do you mean that it felt exceptionally independent of your fingers,
though they were still in full contact? Or were you simply emphasizing
that at that time, as at other times, you were not moving it?
4) When you said that the pointer spelled out "F U" did you mean
literally that it spelled out those two letters, or were you
abbreviating so as not to offend (I would not by any means disapprove of
this or consider it "prudish", concern for the feelings of others is
*not* prudishness)?
5) What was your feelings about its truthfulness when it identified
itself as the devil? How about later? How about now? Why?
6) Was the board on a table, the floor, your knees or where? How were
you sitting?
7) Did the pointer go straight up or in an arc? If the latter how did
the direction compare to the way you and your friend were sitting?
Which direction did the board go, relative to you and your friend and
relative to your friend? Was it flung across the room high or low?
Thats all for now at least.
Let me emphasize once again that you are under no obligation -- even
"social" -- to answer these questions. I do not in any way wish to
pressure you to do something you do not wish to do. My reasons for
asking are "curiosity" but *not* idle curiosity. I wish to understand.
Thanks for your attention, and thanks once again for sharing what you
have with us.
Topher
|
8.182 | | SUBURB::ABSOLOMT | | Mon Jul 10 1989 08:21 | 10 |
| Phil you liar,
Alex fell at the first, Chris took the wrong the course.
Mind you, I think Giles is now Master of the Universe.
**** MESSAGE ****
When I get a second I have some good stuff to add to this file,
anyone heard of Lucifer?
|
8.183 | giles,hoho | SUBURB::GLOVERP | I'll have a Tanglefoot | Tue Jul 11 1989 08:48 | 16 |
| Tony,
Chris didnt take the wrong course,she got excited when alex went
down...........
Lucifer has a note put in much further down in this file,if I remember
correct,hes the bringer of light,doesnt make much sence to me,but
then again..
Did you see the making of the Evil dead last night? That film may
be funny but what effects!! I like the bit where they trap the 'ol
beastie in the celler,trap its head and stamp on it..its eye pops
out and hurtles throught the air, straight down a screeming girls
gob!!! Sikkkooo!!
Phil
|
8.184 | | VCSESU::COOK | VAXcluster Engineering In-House Musician | Tue Jul 11 1989 09:35 | 6 |
|
re; last two
You flunk the rationality test.
/prc
|
8.185 | LUCY WUCY | SUBURB::ABSOLOMT | | Tue Jul 11 1989 15:06 | 11 |
| While doing the board a couple of weeks ago, I was speaking to a
`spirit' named George. When carried on for around about twenty minutes
until without any reason,(i.e he was spelling nothin nasty), my
friend asked if his name was really George, "No", "What is your
real name," "Lucifer". Well apparently Lucifer isn't the nicest
bloke around. CAN SOMEONE TELL IN PLAIN ENGLISH WHO HE IS.Is he
something to do with the Devil?
Also my friend has acquired this trick when we get this spirit
Zelum, of asking questions without saying a word. We checked he
wasn't lying with the usual family names,birthdays etc. It was all
correct.CAN ANYONE ELSE DO THIS?
|
8.186 | Yes and Yes. | CADSYS::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Tue Jul 11 1989 15:46 | 29 |
| RE: .185
Yes Lucifer is the devil. According to tradition it is the name he had
in heaven before his revolt and consequent fall from grace. I would
not believe him, however, in his claims of being Lucifer. The devil
is supposedly the 2nd most powerfull being in the universe -- why would
he bother to have a personal conversation with you? Lucifer is lies
incarnate (if he is anything at all). If he were Lucifer then nothing
he would say could be believed at all -- including his claim that he
is Lucifer. We may safely conclude that George is a liar, one way or
another, and nothing he says can be trusted.
Whatever the nature of the personalities who communicate through Ouija
board, it is *very* clear that many or even most of them enjoy shocking
or even scaring the operators sometimes.
If your friend was anywhere in the room, much less operating the board,
then you may find it worthwhile to know that being able to come up with
such personal information is entirely explainable in "normal" terms.
It is to be *expected* that the personality would know such things.
That does not mean, of course that those "normal" explanations are
correct in this case. Much more interesting is if the personality
knows things that no one in the room knows or could ever possibly
have known (since the subconscious remembers many seemingly trivial
things that we have consciously forgotten) or guessed (since the
subconsious is extraordinarily good at deducing and guessing things
that we consciously find surprising).
Topher
|
8.187 | | CSC32::MORGAN | Celebrating the Cybernetic Age. | Tue Jul 11 1989 17:23 | 39 |
| Re: 8.186, Topher,
> Yes Lucifer is the devil. According to tradition it is the name
> he had in heaven before his revolt and consequent fall from grace.
Repsectfully I disagree. The noun Lucifer was mistranslated in
the O.T. It is "son of the morning" and astrolonomically is Venus. My
nearest guess is that Venus was seen as a counterfiet Sun.
Consequently confusion exists when "astrological" knowledge of
perhaps the Babylonians, their captors, is mixed in with Hebrew myth
cycles. Sorta' a mixture of fishes and worms.
Such a mixture of myth systems is expected when one culture is a
captive of another. Previously the Egyptians were the Hebrews
captors and the same happened with the Opposer of Job being
transformed into Set/Set'hen/Satan.
The Devil is a relatively new occurance. Somewhere about 300 to
400 C.E. the church tried to wipe out Pan/Cernnunos worship. Pan,
along with Dionysus (from 1800 BCE or so and very strongly worshiped),
is from Arcadia and was typically represented with horns and goats
leggings. Pan/Cernnunos was turned into the Christian Devil to repel
the common folk away from the Nature based religions. A henious crime
indeed.
> I would not believe him, however, in his claims of being Lucifer.
In my experience a communication or vision based upon mixed or
confused myth cycles is just that, confused. There seems to be a
reason though...
> Whatever the nature of the personalities who communicate through
> Ouija board, it is *very* clear that many or even most of them enjoy
> shocking or even scaring the operators sometimes.
My personal experience with entites such as these is they get
off scaring incarnates. My guess is they feed upon emotional
energies. It's sorta' a form of speed for them. Maybe a form of
feeding.
|
8.188 | You mean I can't do my Rodney Dangerfield impression? | CADSYS::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Tue Jul 11 1989 18:16 | 43 |
| RE: .186
Somewhere you'll find that I recently wrote something about the origin
of the name Lucifer.
I was not aware that it appears in any translation of the OT (although
I am no biblical scholar). The devil as such does not appear anywhere
in the OT (the Serpent of Eden was traditionally interpretted as a
Serpent; Satan, literally Opponent, in the story of Job was a term which
was part of the ancient Hebrew system of justice and is best translated
into modern terms as Prosecuting Attorney). It is the Latin name,
not Babylonian and was no longer used in astrology by the time of the
Roman Empire (it refered only to the Morning Star, and not to the
Evening star).
My strong impression is that the association of Lucifer with Satan did
not come about until roughly the time of Dante.
However by the beginning of the C.E. the concept of the Devil existed
as part of the common belief system of many Jews. This can be found
from reading various Appocrapha. Its source is probably three-fold:
Iranian (it shares the concept with Mithraism), Helinistic (the concept
of the Dialectic) and Gnostism (the concept of the Alien God and the
evil rulers of the Universe). I am not sure at what point it became
part of official Christian doctrine but it almost certainly existed
at least unofficially from the very beginning. (Correct me if I am
wrong but doesn't Satan -- now clearly literally God's opponent rather
than companion -- appear in the NT to tempt Christ).
The Pan association is one very good contender for the source of the
traditional *image* of the Devil, but his roots are much deeper.
All myths come from mixings and borrowings and learnings from "foreign"
sources.
In any case all this is irrelevant. A name is a name, and if there is
a Devil, then his name is unlikely to be directly renderable or
comprehensible on an English based Ouija board. The personality chose
to give a name for the Devil which is in common use, and which is
supposed to be, unlike either Satan or the Devil, a *name* rather than
a title.
Topher
|
8.189 | You always have my respect. B^) | CSC32::MORGAN | Celebrating the Cybernetic Age. | Tue Jul 11 1989 19:11 | 76 |
| re: <<< Note 8.188 by CADSYS::COOPER "Topher Cooper" >>>
> Somewhere you'll find that I recently wrote something about the origin
> of the name Lucifer.
Thanx, I'll look for it.
> The devil as such does not appear anywhere
> in the OT (the Serpent of Eden was traditionally interpretted as a
> Serpent; Satan, literally Opponent, in the story of Job was a term which
> was part of the ancient Hebrew system of justice and is best translated
> into modern terms as Prosecuting Attorney).
It seems to me there is a differencce between "devil" as demons and
"Devil" as teh Evil One. The Devil is so recent it wouldn't appear in
the O.T.
> It is the Latin name,
> not Babylonian and was no longer used in astrology by the time of the
> Roman Empire (it refered only to the Morning Star, and not to the
> Evening star).
I think it was something like "Hespathos". And the Latin name probably
would predominate in the Latin Vulgate.
> My strong impression is that the association of Lucifer with Satan did
> not come about until roughly the time of Dante.
> However by the beginning of the C.E. the concept of the Devil existed
> as part of the common belief system of many Jews. This can be found
> from reading various Appocrapha. Its source is probably three-fold:
> Iranian (it shares the concept with Mithraism), Helinistic (the concept
> of the Dialectic) and Gnostism (the concept of the Alien God and the
> evil rulers of the Universe).
Ok, is that "Devil" or "devil"? And what is the relationship between
the Asian Indian "deva" and "devil"?
Rulers of the Universe?? The Evil Demiurge?!! Run away! Run away! B^)
> I am not sure at what point it became part of official Christian
> doctrine but it almost certainly existed at least unofficially from the
> very beginning. (Correct me if I am wrong but doesn't Satan -- now
> clearly literally God's opponent rather than companion -- appear in the
> NT to tempt Christ).
True the Devil appears to Christ. But was that in the original or added
later? And what is meant by the Aramaic word? I don't know now. It get
very confusing when archaic languages are translated.
> The Pan association is one very good contender for the source of the
> traditional *image* of the Devil, but his roots are much deeper.
A theory of mine is that since Dionysus and Pan came from the same
place that they were, perhaps intentionally, confused together. The
Dionysusian rites were very violent, probably indicating a rebellion of
women (Maenads ?) against the strongly patriarchial sociatial norms.
> All myths come from mixings and borrowings and learnings from "foreign"
> sources.
I don't know. There seems to be a kernal of a tribal myth cycle mixed
with more advanced myths of more advanced cultures as they were
contacted. Siffening out the original myth cycles is enlightening.
> In any case all this is irrelevant. A name is a name, and if there is
> a Devil, then his name is unlikely to be directly renderable or
> comprehensible on an English based Ouija board. The personality chose
> to give a name for the Devil which is in common use, and which is
> supposed to be, unlike either Satan or the Devil, a *name* rather than
> a title.
A truer statement has not be said in a while. B^)
|
8.190 | | CSC32::MORGAN | Celebrating the Cybernetic Age. | Tue Jul 11 1989 19:29 | 27 |
| re: <<< Note 8.185 by SUBURB::ABSOLOMT >>>
> While doing the board a couple of weeks ago, I was speaking to a
> `spirit' named George. When carried on for around about twenty minutes
> until without any reason,(i.e he was spelling nothin nasty), my friend
> asked if his name was really George, "No", "What is your real name,"
> "Lucifer". Well apparently Lucifer isn't the nicest bloke around. CAN
> SOMEONE TELL IN PLAIN ENGLISH WHO HE IS.Is he something to do with the
> Devil?
Lucifer was a rather minor Roman deity. You might start with that in
the Library. Perhaps a reference on local Roman deities would provide
the starting point.
> Also my friend has acquired this trick when we get this spirit
> Zelum, of asking questions without saying a word. We checked he
> wasn't lying with the usual family names,birthdays etc. It was all
> correct.CAN ANYONE ELSE DO THIS?
I had an interesting run in with one of these. My guess is that the
entity is an extension of yours or his being. It knows what you or he
know. After realizing that it is another part of your being it usually
goes away, knowing the gig is up.
The real Lucifer usually shows up, uh, expresses itself, as flashes of
bright light. Generally no words are offered. Your experience
apparently is a Trickster.
|
8.191 | well ... | LESCOM::KALLIS | To thine own self be candid. | Wed Jul 12 1989 09:38 | 55 |
| Re .187 (Mikie?):
>> Yes Lucifer is the devil. According to tradition it is the name
>> he had in heaven before his revolt and consequent fall from grace.
> Repsectfully I disagree. The noun Lucifer was mistranslated in
>the O.T. It is "son of the morning" and astrolonomically is Venus.
The passage you have in mind, I suspect, is Isiah 14:12-14 --
"How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning!
how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!
"For thou hast said inb thine heart, I will ascend into heaven,
I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon
the mount of the congregation in the sides of the north:
"I will ascend above the heights of the clouds: I will be like the
most High."
Now here, clearly, the writer is _not_ talking about a devil (or _the_
Devil); rather he is writing of one who would emulate one. This
is paralleled by the Satan story (Rev 12:7-9) --
"And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against
the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels.
"And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven.
"And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent called the
Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out
into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him."
> Such a mixture of myth systems is expected when one culture is a
>captive of another. Previously the Egyptians were the Hebrews
>captors and the same happened with the Opposer of Job being
>transformed into Set/Set'hen/Satan.
The Set to Satan connection is hardly proven, or even demonstrated.
The so-called "Set'hen" explanation is discussed in some detail
in the RELIGION conference under "Temple of Set" discussion, and
seems scholastically dubious.
re Venus:]
>I think it was something like "Hespathos".
I believe that in early times, "the Morning Star" and "the evening
star" were thought to be different. The Morning Star was "Phosphoros"
and the Evening Star "Hesphoros." "Phosphoros" eventually was changed
to "phosphorus" when referring to a chemical, but that's another
matter. Later, the Morning and Evening Stars were identified as
a singler planet, Venus.
Under any circumstances, whatever the entity who's involved is _really_
is, ther key point is that it might not be smart to take its messages
without question.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
8.192 | don't follow leaders, watch your parking meters... | HYDRA::LARU | goin' to graceland | Wed Jul 12 1989 10:46 | 8 |
| � Under any circumstances, whatever the entity who's involved is _really_
� is, ther key point is that it might not be smart to take its messages
� without question.
I suggest that it is smart NEVER to take ANY messages without
question.
/bruce
|
8.193 | QUE? | SUBURB::ABSOLOMT | | Wed Jul 12 1989 13:53 | 2 |
| Can I just say that you boys know some really heavy stuff, is this
a long-term hobby or what?
|
8.194 | | CSC32::MORGAN | Celebrating the Cybernetic Age. | Wed Jul 12 1989 15:43 | 7 |
| re: <<< Note 8.193 by SUBURB::ABSOLOMT >>>
>Can I just say that you boys know some really heavy stuff, is this
>a long-term hobby or what?
Let's just say it's a way of life. B^)
|
8.195 | | MRED::DONHAM | I'll see it when I believe it. | Fri Jul 14 1989 13:00 | 15 |
| < Note 8.191 by LESCOM::KALLIS "To thine own self be candid." >
> The passage you have in mind, I suspect, is Isiah 14:12-14 --
>
> "How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning!
> how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!
> "For thou hast said inb thine heart, I will ascend into heaven,
> I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon
> the mount of the congregation in the sides of the north:
> "I will ascend above the heights of the clouds: I will be like the
> most High."
This sounds to me like a description of a very bright comet.
Perry
|
8.196 | It's kind of a club... | UBRKIT::PAINTER | Celebrate life! | Fri Jul 14 1989 19:33 | 8 |
|
Re.193 (Absolomt)
They're just bliss followers.
(;^) Especially Mikie.
Cindy
|
8.197 | phew | SUBURB::GLOVERP | pigpens have more fun.... | Tue Jul 18 1989 09:02 | 8 |
| I think I'll have to agree with Tony,Its a great subject
to read on,but,and this is not a critisism S.K.jr, when you
are trying to describe a topic,could you at least keep the reply's
abit more understandable,if just for a while,huh?
tankxs in advance
Phil.
|
8.198 | worth pointing out | LESCOM::KALLIS | To thine own self be candid. | Tue Jul 18 1989 09:26 | 25 |
| Re .197 (phil):
> ........ but, and this is not a critisism S.K.jr, when you
>are trying to describe a topic,could you at least keep the reply's
>abit more understandable ....
It's worthy of a criticism, and one for which I must offer an apology.
I was trying to throw half a dozen points together in my reply while
simultaneously being involved with a telephone conversation; I hope
I was less obscure on the phone.
My basic points were that 1) Lucifer was indeed mentioned in the
Old Testament, and that the reference was keyed to the idea of some
person or entity that, from the text, appeared to be trying to emulate
the chief rebel of the Heavenly Host, as described in the New
Testament; and 2) that "Lucifer" as an astronomical object may have
been synonymous with the planet Venus, but that the usual names
for the planet were "phosphoros" [which I rather incoherently pointed
out was a name later modified slightly and tagged to one of the
chemical elements] and "hesphoros," depending whether it were the
evening or morning star at the time.
I'll try to be less rushed in the future. Sorry.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
8.199 | More info required. | PEKING::BECKC | | Tue Jul 18 1989 09:37 | 16 |
| Phil,
You ought to get one of these things for your party, it could be
very interesting.
One thing I don't understand, is if you haven't got a ouji board,
how do you make one out of paper, as is suggested in earlier notes,
I'm very interested in this kind of thing and have never dabbled.
If truth be known, I'd be scared witless.
Regards
Chrissie
|
8.200 | | VCSESU::COOK | VAXcluster Engineering In-House Musician | Tue Jul 18 1989 09:48 | 5 |
|
Heck, if anyone wants a board, I'll give mine away. Don't have the
pointer though.
/prc
|
8.201 | Yet some more questions????? | PEKING::BECKC | | Tue Jul 18 1989 10:06 | 8 |
|
Whats a pointer thou, and what do both the board and pointer look
like, sorry if I appear to be dumb, but I've never seen one of these
things before.
Cheers
|
8.202 | since you ask | LESCOM::KALLIS | To thine own self be candid. | Tue Jul 18 1989 10:14 | 17 |
| re .201:
The "pointer" is generally called a "planchette," though a planchette
with a pen attached can be used by itself in obtaining messages.
The usual planchette for Ouija is an arrow-shaped (or triangular)
object, usually with legs or rollers to enable it to traverse the
board easily. Some planchettes have holes in their centers for
letters to show through.
With some larger boards, a small glass is occasionally used as a
planchette substitute. Actually, any object that isolates a single
letter (or other indicator) from the rest can be used.
Ther board itself has a row of letters and numbers in an arc across
its surface and a few short-response choices like "yes" and "no."
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
8.203 | Home made Ouija | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Tue Jul 18 1989 12:39 | 13 |
|
You could make one out of poster board,using the shiny side as the
surface.Make the letters in an arc from the left side starting at
letter A thru M in one and,under those,the letters N thru Z.Put the
word YES in the upper Left corner.The Word NO in the upper right
corner.Put the numerals 0 thru 9 in a straight line under the
letters.The planchette can be a piece of plastic in the shape of a
triangle with a hole in the middle.Glue some small felt feet on each
point of the plastic piece.
Peace
Michael
|
8.204 | YIKES !!!! | WITNES::FUNK | Correspondence to XIBITA::MM_TEMP | Tue Jul 18 1989 14:58 | 9 |
|
In my naive years, my friends and I made and used a piece of paper
with the alphabet, "YES", "NO" and 0-10 written on with pen. For
a pointer, we just used a quarter. Though it was small, it worked.
When asked what it thought of Anton LaVey (sp?) it spelled
"A 1" ! ! !
/Greg Aharonian
|
8.205 | Curiosity Cured. | PEKING::BECKC | | Wed Jul 19 1989 07:54 | 10 |
|
Steve
Thanks for explaining, somehow, I don't think I will be dabbling,
curiosity got the better of me, and prompted me to ask.
Cheers
Chrissie
|
8.206 | | SUBURB::GLOVERP | pigpens have more fun.... | Wed Jul 19 1989 09:36 | 6 |
|
AW,Chrissie,
Wot,no dabbling on party night *-:-)))))))))
Phil-who-loves-a-dabble-
|
8.207 | Glad to have Info | WLDWST::BTKACIK | | Wed Jul 19 1989 12:37 | 26 |
| I'm not sure if I'm replying quite right, since this is only the
second time I've written in notes. But I'll try.
I have always been very afraid of the weejee, since I "feel" danger
or something very close to it when ever I am near one. I am rather
curious though. I have been told that I am one who should never
try this particular method of communication since I am very "sensative"
by nature.
Can the Planchette be moved without touching it or the board? Some
how I feel it could be moved by the energy of the users, but I am
not sure.
Is it possible for a "spirit" or whatever to inhabit a person from
this experience? I'm sorry the word has escaped me for this term.
I am very glad that you give the warnings that you have in this
conference, even though I have not played around with this particular
method of communication I believe in its danger. I have tried seance
(sp).
Thanks for a great reading list and the history. I'd be interested
in learning more.
Beth
|
8.208 | Alone in a dark room,on a stormy night. | SUBURB::IN_HOUSE | | Fri Jul 21 1989 09:32 | 9 |
| Kal my man,
None of my friends want to use the board when I do,so I want
to know if there is more danger involved doing it alone.
I remember the girl in `Witchboard' went a bit squey after she
had used it alone.
Tony Ab
|
8.209 | | TRUCKS::WRIGLEY | Brain the size of a peanut | Fri Jul 21 1989 12:08 | 24 |
|
My only experience of a Oiuja board was a round pub table with letters written
in chalk around the edge. There was a girl there, who was well into
spiritualism, who explained that the idea was to trap a spirit in a down-turned
glass. If you got the devil you should immediately turn the glass up, otherwise
if the glass flew of the table and smashed every one at the table would die
horribly in the near future.
Any one heard of this?
Another lad there said he'd previously and windows had blown open, pictures
fell of the wall and they got the general impression that some one out there
didn't like them.
Neither of these two would take part, but undaunted, myself and three other
sceptics tried, and it worked far to well for my liking.
I am now convinced that playing with Ouija boards can be dangerous for your
health.
Alan.
|
8.210 | just a little humor-very little! | BTOVT::EVANS_D | LOST AND PROFOUND | Tue Jul 25 1989 11:47 | 10 |
| < POOPER SCOOPER >
Well, I finally broke down and got a Oiuja board.I tried it out last
night,and the results were amazing!I contacted a spirit named
euirhtg,and it told me, among other things,that both John and Bobby
Kennedy would be shot,men would walk on the moon before 1970, and
that Joan Collins would die from complications from a botched face-
lift.With that,the board lifted straight off the table,and flung
itself into the trashcan,where it remains to this very day!
- Convinced
|
8.211 | ---- | BAHTAT::STURROCK | Times tide will smother me... | Tue Aug 01 1989 10:49 | 9 |
| O.K. once you've got your board and pointer is there anything else
you need such as a candle. I heard that you should have the 4 elements
situated around the table (candle, soil, water, air). The lights
should be out yes???
Also how do you make actual contact...I mean after watching so many
movies saying 'IS ANYBODY THEEERRRREEEE????' would seem really silly!
Bruce, Leeds
|
8.212 | When all else fails. Read the directions 8^) | COMET2::TIMPSON | Comfortable Chair | Tue Aug 01 1989 11:04 | 1 |
|
|
8.213 | Say: "Hi,my name is -----" | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Tue Aug 01 1989 12:35 | 8 |
|
You donot need anything else,just the board and the pointer.You donot
need the lights out,it will work fine in broad daylight.
Peace
Michael
|
8.214 | B,B & C | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | Inflict kindness | Fri Aug 04 1989 21:06 | 9 |
| Last time a group of us use the Ouija, we had on hand a candle,
an open Bible and a bell.
I was advised that the bell, book and candle were old and powerful
symbols for driving away evil spirits.
Well, it didn't hurt!;-)
Richard
|
8.215 | My experience... | GIAMEM::K_GREELIS | | Wed Aug 09 1989 19:00 | 38 |
| Hi, I'm new to this conference and the Ouija subject attracted my
attention. I read all the notes on it, and despite the warnings
received, my curiosity got the best of me.
I had a long conversation with a spirit that was supposedly my gaurdian
angle. He told me he was there to protect me and he could do me
no harm. Well, part way through the conversation, we broke contact
and this aweful spirit came on and told me that my sister, who is
pregnant right now, is going to have a baby boy. Then he said that
the baby was going to come out fine, and the mother wasn't. I asked
it if my sister would live and it spelled out "No". Needless to
say, I just wanted to take that board and find the nearest trashcan.
Well, I decided that I would not be able to live with myself thinking
that, so I tried again and got in contact with the spirit that was
supposedly my guardian angle. He told me that the other one was
evil and was just trying to scare me. I was relieved, in a way,
but it still frightens me.
We continued the conversation and at the end he told me that the
Ouija was a cult, and that he was evil and would hurt me if I continued
using it. He told me I should throw the thing away. I did just
that. We (the other person I was doing this with was my boyfriend-I
wasn't alone) hacked it up then burnt it. I never want to touch
another one again.
I admit, I was skeptical at first, but after all that I saw and
heard today, I don't doubt a single thing anyone says about it.
The story I told was shortened, but I told most of it. I feel better
telling people about it. Especially people that understand, and
won't think I'm nuts.
I just want to know about my sister. I don't know what to believe,
and even though I don't want to believe what that other spirit said,
and my "guardian angle" said it wasn't true and not to worry, I
still wonder what to believe.
Any comments?
|
8.216 | relax. | CADSYS::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Wed Aug 09 1989 19:31 | 14 |
| RE: .215
Whatever the mechanism of the ouija:
The personalities which manifest through it frequently seem to have as
their goal to scare the bej**s out of the operators. They say whatever
is apropos which will do that most effectively. Although there are
exceptions, the ouija rarely proves to be a reliable way of learning
things about this plane which we don't already know.
I wouldn't worry about it, I really woudn't. You've been talking to
some thug who gets pleasure from scaring you -- that is all.
Topher
|
8.217 | | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Thu Aug 10 1989 09:12 | 8 |
|
I would not believe what you were told. These entities must have sensed
your fear,and,had their fun with you. They will do that. I know from
experience.
Peace
Michael
|
8.218 | | GIAMEM::K_GREELIS | | Thu Aug 10 1989 22:13 | 3 |
| Thanks. I hope you're right. They did a pretty good job at it
though. Have you (or anyone) found the entities reliable in predicting
the future? Just curious.
|
8.219 | NO | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Fri Aug 11 1989 07:29 | 6 |
| As far as predictions,I have not found them to be reliable,in fact,
my contact stated that he could not predict future events.
Peace
Michael
|
8.220 | PRAY FOR PROTECTION! | DEMING::BARKER | | Fri Aug 11 1989 16:57 | 15 |
| My stars!! From reading some of the notes in this file, you'd think
the Ouiga Board was a channel for all sorts of malevolent entities
to get their chance to mess up the minds of earth-bound creatures.
I have never had any reaction from the board at all. Maybe,
the "pond scum" that can inhabit the other side are intimidated
by my close ties to my sister-in-law who is a Dominican nun.
Actually, I can just picture one of my deceased grandmothers arm-
wrestling with anyone who tries to mess up my mind with false and
predatory garbage.
Mary who has become a bit cynical about it all!!!
|
8.221 | | CSC32::WOLBACH | | Fri Aug 11 1989 23:58 | 23 |
|
.218
I have had an 'entity' (personality) accurately predict a
future event.
15 years ago the personality with whom we corresponded mentioned
that I would have 1 child. At another time he told my husband
he would have 3 children. I remember being mildly confused, but
didn't think much of it.
I do indeed have one child. My husband and I are now divorced
(a situation that was inconceivable to me 15 years ago). In ad-
dition to his child, he is also the stepfather of 2 more children.
Future events cannot be predicted. Possible futures can be dis-
cussed, but nothing is set until the individual actually sets in
motion the events necessary to cause the predicted future to be-
come reality.
Deborah
|
8.222 | LIGHT OF GOD | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Tue Aug 15 1989 10:20 | 23 |
|
Kathy,
I am responding to you here instead of the new note. I'm sure the
moderators will help you move your note. I am sorry to hear about your
sisters situation. I would be very concerned too. In her state of
mind,I would be sure to keep close contact with her,and,try to be with
her as much as possible. I would be very concerned about the
children,as well. Its hard telling what she might do. I would suggest
she continue to get medical treatment. In addition to that,there is a
number of things you could help her do concerning the Ouija board. Look
thru these notes for suggestions. I would get rid of the board first.
Another thing that could be done is a cleansing of the place where she
lives. By meditation,visualize a strong,powerful light surrounding the
place where she lives. Have the light penetrating thru,and,surrounding
your sister,and,her children. Have her do this also,as often as
needed. She should visualize this light as a protector,that,she carries
it with her,and,can draw from it at any time. I wish you the
best,and,hope things work out.
Peace
Michael
|
8.223 | Do's and don'ts of Ouija | HPSTEK::EVANS | Lost & Spaced | Tue Oct 24 1989 12:29 | 17 |
| In light of recent tragedies involving Ouija boards, I have compiled a
list of safety measures to insure against accidental Ouijiisms.
1.NEVER clean a loaded Ouija board!!!This cannot be over stated.When
cleaning,always point planchette AWAY from others.
2.When transporting a board, keep planchette pointed at the ground.
3.Never store board and planchette in the same place- always keep
planchette in a separate, locked case, out of children's reach.
4.Do NOT mix Ouija board with other board games.Mixing Ouija with
Monopoly has caused wild stock market fluctuations.An Ouija and Clue
combination caused Mrs.Lurleen Fuddpucker of Bedpan,Ohio to be
budgeoned to death in the library by Colonel Mustard.
5.And last but not least, avoid semi-automatic Ouija boards, as their
erratic bursts of electroplasmic energy have caused major appliences
to malfunction.
I hope this list prevents any more Ouija misfires.
Sincerely,Dr.I.C. Beyond
|
8.224 | Ouiji-wizz | BTOVT::EVANS_D | Bring back Tailfins! | Tue Oct 24 1989 13:06 | 4 |
| FLASH!!!!!NEWS UPDATE!!!!!!
My Ouija board is still in the trash, and in the SAME PLACE I LEFT
IT!!! Amazing coincidence, or Satan? YOU DECIDE!
Dave's Clone
|
8.225 | Are you a condo owner too? | CGVAX2::PAINTER | One small step... | Tue Oct 24 1989 18:41 | 13 |
| Re.224 (Clone) on trash
Nah - just a lazy housekeeper. I leave my trash in the same place for
WEEKS.
...except sometimes it's been known to take on a whole new life of its
own and walk away by itself...sometimes in the direction of the
dumpster...
Hm...y'know, it might be Satan after all. I'll remember to tip him
well when the holidays roll around. *<(8*)
Cindy
|
8.226 | Satan, or lazy slob? | HPSTEK::EVANS | Lost and Profound | Thu Oct 26 1989 15:37 | 4 |
| re.225:
Cindy,
I think it's satan after all.My trash stinks like hell!
- Me
|
8.227 | Kind of nervous | SALEM::SMORIN | | Fri Oct 27 1989 12:45 | 32 |
|
Hello to all DEJAVU noters.
I don't know where to begin. I've read all of the notes in this
conference. It has been very interesting. I want to say that I
beleive in the ouijai (sp.) board. It took me a couple of days
to get through all of the notes. In those days all I could think
about was going out and buying one of these boards. As I progressed
in the notes, I began to think should I buy one or not? I have
thought about who I would use it with and it would probably be my
fiance (sp.) anyways I don't know if she would want to do this.
Or even want to try and uderstand why I would want to do something
like this.
I've read all the warnings about the ouijai board. I know
that you should imagine the white light and say a prayer before
using the board. I want to have a good experience. I think if
we had a bad experience with the board, it would scare my fiance
very much.
QUESTION:
How would you end your encounter with the spirit after you
have had enough excitement for the evening?
Does anybody have anything they would like to tell me? Please.
Shawn
|
8.228 | ancient oriental secret | SALEM::TAYLOR_J | | Fri Oct 27 1989 17:07 | 9 |
| Fold up the board,put it back in the box,put the box away!
Learned from a Buddist Monk in Tibet
JT
|
8.229 | try something else first | GVAADG::DONALDSON | the green frog leaps... | Mon Oct 30 1989 03:30 | 15 |
| Re: .227
Hi Shawn, in case that board is still open, just
a few thoughts from me. Ask yourself carefully why
you want to do this. If it's because of an urge to
'inner growth' then have you tried some of the many other
options available? (Many detailed in this conference).
Don't do this for excitement. And don't involve your fianc�e
if she isn't keen on the idea.
Finally, if you still want to go ahead then try to do
it with someone who has experience of this.
John.
|
8.230 | well, this is one way | LYRIC::BOBBITT | at night, the ice weasels come... | Wed Nov 01 1989 12:33 | 21 |
| Well, to close out a ouija session, we used to do the following.
Dismiss the summoned spirit with whom we were conversing
Thank the "spirit of the board" (we had a "resident" spirit who
would get other spirits' attention so we could converse with them)
for his efforts
Slide the planchette ALL the way off the board (no particular
direction) and move it back and forth across the edge of the board
several times (we were under the impression that a spirit could
be within/touching the planchette ON the board, but not when it
was OFF the board, so we'd kind of "wipe the spirit" off the
planchette, if that makes any sense).
Put the board away (I assume some people wrap the board/box in a
special scarf or put it in a special place - as one might do with
tarot cards - but we didn't)...
-Jody
|
8.231 | | BSS::BLAZEK | baby shot formaldehyde | Wed Nov 01 1989 14:28 | 8 |
|
That's interesting, Jody, I used to wipe off the planchette too
but it was more to cleanse the energy of the board of MY energy
rather than that of the spiritual entity's. I never had really
thought about it the meaning before.
Carla
|
8.232 | thanks | SALEM::SMORIN | | Mon Nov 06 1989 17:20 | 25 |
| Re.229
John,
Sorry that I took so long to reply, but we had P.I. last week.
This is the first time I've had a chance to write back.
Well, I thought about what you said, and I don't think I'm going
to try it yet. For one, Becki was not to keen on the idea.
For two, what you said about doing for excitement hit home with
me. Don't get me wrong I believe that there are spirits out there
that can be reached. But I don't think I'm ready for them yet.
I figure that if I meet someone who has more experience with this
sort of thing and they wan't to give it a whirl I'll go for it.
Thanks for your reply, I really appreciate it.
I would love to here more about anybodys experiences with the ouija
board. I find them very interesting.
Shawn
|
8.233 | haunting little town-salem | NRADM::COLLETON | magicians do it with their hands! | Tue Nov 07 1989 09:18 | 6 |
| GEESH maybe some of your warnings should be on the back of the box
that the board and planchette come together in?
interesting thought
weird how the board is manufactured in that little infamous
town of SALEM MASS. wonder if theres a connection?
Bill-
|
8.234 | fess up | SALEM::SMORIN | | Tue Nov 14 1989 09:38 | 5 |
|
Come on theres got to be somebody out there with a story to tell.
shawn
|
8.235 | | BSS::BLAZEK | walls as wide as lovers eyes | Wed Nov 15 1989 11:41 | 14 |
|
Shawn,
Many people have relayed many stories about Ouija experiences,
some good and some not-so-good. My own personal experiences
have been good but they've also already been expressed, or at
least the ones that I want to share, here.
And experiences can be so personal that the individual is not
ready to share it with others, especially in a public place as
DEJAVU. Please respect that with patience.
Carla
|
8.236 | | SALEM::SMORIN | | Wed Nov 15 1989 12:12 | 6 |
| Carla
I'm not trying to pry into anybodys personal experiences. I was
just intersted in anything somebody would like to share.
shawn
|
8.237 | right town, wrong state | CTOAVX::BALDYGA | | Wed Nov 15 1989 16:47 | 7 |
|
RE.233 (et al)
not to mislead, but i do believe that node "SALEM" is in NH not
MASS.....is that right Shawn?
|
8.238 | Cow Hampshire | SALEM::SMORIN | | Thu Nov 16 1989 09:26 | 3 |
| Yes you are right SALEM (NIO) is in N.H.
Shawn
|
8.239 | | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Thu Nov 16 1989 12:45 | 16 |
|
Shawn,
I have,on a regular basis,entered some of my experiences here in
DEJAVU. A lot of what I do is personal in nature. I have been
communicating for the last 3 years or so. I havnt much lately. I have
been able to communicate with many different spirits,some
interesting,some not. I occasionally use it to find out things that may
have occurred when I am not around. Sometimes the imformation has been
given to me. I have been able to get messages from some relatives and
for some friends. I dont understand how and why it works,but it does.
My wife and I work it together.
Peace
Michael
|
8.240 | CURIOUS | SALEM::SMORIN | | Thu Nov 16 1989 18:44 | 8 |
| Michael
Thanks for writing. If you don't mind, I have a question.
What do you mean when you say "I occasionally use it to find out
things that may have occured when I am not around." If it is
personal I understand. ;*)
curious
Shawn
|
8.241 | THE WATCHER | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Mon Nov 20 1989 12:33 | 12 |
|
Shawn,
My contact on the Ouija board sort of "watches" over things when my
wife and I are away. He has,on several occasions,told us of things that
happened while we were away. We have confirmed this. So,sometimes,I
will ask him about it if I feel a need.
Peace
Michael
|
8.242 | THE WATCHER 2 | SALEM::SMORIN | | Tue Nov 21 1989 14:35 | 6 |
| Michael
I'm not sure I understand. Do you mean that he watches over things
at your home, or things that happen in his world?
Shawn
|
8.243 | HOME WATCHER | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Wed Nov 22 1989 10:16 | 14 |
|
Shawn,
Both. His position of authority in his world requires his "watching"
over his area of responsibilities. He also seems to watch over our home
when we are at home or away,because he will mention things that
happened when we are home,and,if we are away,he will tell us about
things which we have confirmed many times. I dont understand how any of
this works,although I have some theories of my own. I am just amazed at
it and,my curiousity keeps me working with it.
Peace
Michael
|
8.244 | Need Advice, please respond | WMOIS::MBROWN | | Fri Dec 08 1989 15:43 | 31 |
| Hello,
I am a newcomer to this file. I am very interested in this topic and I
am eager to try the Ouija Board. I understand that the board can be a
dangerous tool, however I have read nearly half of the replies on this
file and I must say, alot of it scars me. I will not attempt the board
until I am totally in a "positive" state of mind.
What I wish to accomplish from the board, is to contact my broght who
was killed in a car accident 10 years ago. Can I accomplish this from
the Ouija Board? Should I do this alone? My father just died in June,
and I have 2 other very close relatives who also passed away within the
last 5 years, could they be considered "guardians" of mine?? I still
live in the same house I grew up in, would it help if I tried it there?
Or does the place matter?
The only thing I'm concerned with is contacting a negative entity.
I've even gone as far as to make a few calls to people I know that have
tried this, and asked for guidance on protection and cautions.
I'd like to try this with one other person using the board with me, and
another writing the responses down on paper. Should I ask people who
knew my brother? Or should I ask anyone at all?
All responses welcome, PLEASE!
Thank you in advance,
Melissa
|
8.245 | "Oops" | WMOIS::MBROWN | | Fri Dec 08 1989 16:13 | 9 |
| RE:8.244
It was my brother who was killed in the car accident (typo "broght").
Thanx,
Melissa
|
8.246 | RE: 8.223 "Cleaning"? | WMOIS::MBROWN | | Fri Dec 15 1989 11:26 | 12 |
| re: 8.223
When you mentioned "CLEAN" a loaded board, what does this mean? I do
not understand the term "Clean". Do you mean actually "clean" it, like
with a household cleaner, or "clean" it of spirits? How would this
"Cleaning" be done?
Just asking.
Thanx
Meliss
|
8.247 | DEAR NEWCOMER | SA1794::LIVE | | Wed Dec 20 1989 07:15 | 12 |
|
MELISSA
WELCOME TO THE FILE. I AM A NEWCOMER MYSELF. I FIND
IT VERY INTERESTING THAT YOU WANT TO FIND YOUR DECEASED
BROTHER BY USING THE OUIJA BOARD. IF YOU DO USE THE
BOARD I SUGGEST THAT YOU BE VERY CAREFUL. I HEARD LOTS
OF STORIES. I MYSELF WOULD BE SCARED TO FIND SOMEONE I
LOVE BY MEANS OF EVIL.
JOHN
|
8.248 | Gone an alternate route! | WMOIS::MBROWN | | Wed Dec 20 1989 08:53 | 13 |
| John,
I've decided to go another route, in regards to contacting by Brother.
A co-worker told me of a medium who practices locally, So I've made an
appointment and I'm off to the medium.
We'll see. It's almost as if my brother needs to speak to me for some
reason. I have a very strong desire to do this, yet, in the past, I
never would have gotten involved with this sort of thing.
Thanx for responding.
Melissa
|
8.249 | CURRIOUS MIND'S | SA1794::LIVE | | Wed Dec 20 1989 09:40 | 10 |
| MELISSA
I WOULD REALLY APPRECIATE IT IF YOU WOULD RESPOND TO ME AFTER
YOUR APPOINTMENT TO LET ME KNOW HOW IT WENT! ONLY IF YOU REALLY
WANT TO OK! WELL GOOD LUCK!
JOHN
|
8.250 | information | SUBSYS::NEUMYER | | Thu Dec 21 1989 13:15 | 14 |
|
Another newcomer here. I have only used a ouija board once nad not too
seriously. I am still waiting for the one future event to happen to
verify what the board said.
I would like some clarification....
1. Many replies have stated that its dangerous to use the
board, but not one has said what will happen. Also no one has said
anything bad has happened directly to them because of the board. How
about some specifics.
ed
|
8.251 | dir/title=ouija | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Fri Dec 22 1989 06:11 | 10 |
| ED,
The imformation you seek is contained in this conference. You might
want to do a dir/title=Ouija to find all the notes on the subject,which
discusses the pros and cons. I have been working the Ouija for the last
3 years.Some of my experiences are written in this conference.
Peace
Michael
|
8.252 | My experience w/the medium | WMOIS::MBROWN | | Wed Dec 27 1989 09:11 | 41 |
| Hello dejavu readers,
I'm back!! I had my appointment w/the medium last night. I felt that
she was very accurate in her impressions. I brought my mom along for
the session, she also thought she was accurate. First she took
something of mine (my watch) which I wear everyday, and she began
telling me all about my life, past present and future. *This woman
only knows my first name, she does not know where I live, how old I am,
or any other personal iformation about me. When I made the appointment
I told her my first name and gave her my work #, if she had to change
the appointment for any reason. I didn't even tell her how my brother
died.
Any way, she really said alot of things that hit the nail on the head!!
After reading me, she took my mom's watch and told her all about her
life, past present and future! My mom was shocked w/some of the things
she said!! Very accurate!!! The medium (Ann) claimed that my brother
was right in the room w/us and she could feel his presence VERY strong!
Also she could see and feel my Father's presence very strong. She
decribed him to a "T".
I asked her to ask him (my brother) if there was something he wanted to
say to me, (I felt that he brought me to her because he had something to
say to me)she told me that he stressed to her for me to pray for his
progress and elevation!! He told he to tell me to "let go" so he can
progress to higher elevations. He told me that the more I mourn him,
the slower it makes his progression, that I must let him go towrards
God. He and my father also wanted us to know that they are at peace.
She said one thing that both me & my mom can't understand what it
means, but she said that if she says things that didn't make sense,
than someday they will, it just hasn't happen yet!
We were there for one solid hour! I will go again, She told me that I
have spiritual powers within me, but I haven't figured out how to use
them yet. She told me that someday she could see me doing the same thing
she was.
I am enlightened. I'm glad I went. And I will pray for him, although
it will be hard to let go.
Melissa
|
8.253 | real answers please | SUBSYS::NEUMYER | Remember Charlie,remember Baker | Thu Dec 28 1989 13:13 | 9 |
| re .251
OK , I looked thru the notes. Still no evidence of "bad" things
happening because of the ouija board. All I see is a lot of "Ooohhhh,
it's spooky " and the like. What physical things have happened and how
many spirits have made it back thru the board.
ed
|
8.254 | A LITTLE OUIJA STORY... | CSCMA::PERRY | | Thu Jan 04 1990 12:52 | 52 |
| Here's a bad thing...
When I was a teenager (I had just gotten my license so I was about
16 yrs old.), My sister, freinds Jean, Rose, Bonnie, and myself
(maybe others) fooled with a ouija board.
We contacted someone who called himself Captain X (meaning I
don't remember the name he used with Captain). We asked
about the future and he warned us of something that was to
happen on September 13th (or was it the 9th), in the afternoon
while driving. This took place some time in the early spring,
I remember it was kind of chilly out.
So time went by and we really never gave it any thought. That summer
I got my license. My sister (older) had just gotten a car
(a used piece of junk) with her boyfreind. September rolled
around, and we would venture out for fun, smoke you-know-what
and just kind of do things. One day we went out to the 'flats'
(located at the Grafton/Westboro line in MAssachusetts) to fly
a kite. It was a blustry warmish day. When it was time to
go home, I BEGGED my sister to let me drive. She did.
We were rounding the bend on route 30 in Grafton when this grasshopper
fly in the window. Of course it scared the life out of me, I
remember it just repulsed me terribly (I don't usually mind bugs).
I veered off the road and hit the guardrail. I put a nasty dent
in the car and my sister was totally P O 'd. At the time I
remembered about the OUIJA incident so we checked the notes we
made at the session. (We wrote down the responses and stuck
them into the OUIJA box and forgot about them). The date
was that days date and the events were accurate.
My opinion is that Capt. X was either being helpful to warn
us or was the one who caused it...kink of playing games with
us down (or in) here.
I wouldn't suggest using a OUIJA board unless you understand
the spirit (or 'other') world alittle. This way you'll
know how to deal with the situation...In my opiinion with
out protecting yourself first (a thought of a circle of
white light or something aloong those lines - there's a
note on that somewhere), then you danger yourself by opening
up your thoughts to a world we don't know alot about
(unless you are an experienced magus or adept in some
spiritual thing).
So I agree with the initial warning given by Mr. Kallis
at the beginning of this conference....
Many blessings.
joe p.
|
8.255 | Who is responsible. | CADSYS::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Thu Jan 04 1990 13:39 | 15 |
| RE: .254 (joe p)
It's also possible that this was an example of unconscious
self-fulfilling prophecy. That you did not *consciously* remeber the
date has no bearing at all -- people often act unconsciously on things
they have forgotten consciously. Your atypical panic reaction to
the insect might have been because you unconsciously associated it with
the suddenly unconsciously remembered prediction, and the panic
resulted in the accident.
I see no particular reason in anything that was said here to believe that
Captain "X" caused the accident in any more direct way. I don't blame
the weatherman on TV if it rains.
Topher
|
8.256 | | SUBSYS::NEUMYER | Remember Charlie,remember Baker | Thu Jan 04 1990 16:17 | 5 |
|
So far not one incident of DIRECT spirit induced danger. Come on, put
up or shut up.
ed
|
8.257 | | CSCMA::PERRY | | Fri Jan 05 1990 09:10 | 9 |
| re .255
yeah you are probably right. I know I didn't conciously
cause the accident - but maybe what you suggest is
accurate.
ed: so dive in! See what happens.... but don't say we didn't warn
ya!
joe p
|
8.258 | | CSCMA::PERRY | | Fri Jan 05 1990 12:30 | 6 |
| yo ed...
check out conference # 1108 having to do with someone's expereince
with a O - board....
joe p
|
8.259 | That wasn't very nice... | CGVAX2::PAINTER | And on Earth, peace... | Fri Jan 05 1990 20:33 | 11 |
|
Re.256 (Neumyer)
>Come on, put up or shut up.
Excuse me??? For a moment I thought I was in a conference other than
DEJAVU - a place where all are welcome, their stories and all. If you
would rather not read them, then please use the <next unseen> key as
opposed to writing words like the above.
Cindy
|
8.260 | Appraisers of games or occult items??? | LEDS::MORRILL | | Wed Jan 10 1990 10:26 | 20 |
| Hello, Dejavuers,
I have an old ouija, and am trying to find an appraiser of old
games and toys. Dunbar's of Milford has placed a price of $50. on
this item, but believes someone more familiar with this type of
thing could give me a better estimate.
The board was purchased at a yard sale in 1967 by me, and I paid
$20. for it then. On the back is a label of directions and origin
stating the mnf. was a WM. FULD, 1306 W.Central Ave, Baltimore, MD USA
Factory & Showrooms 1226-1228 N. Central ave.
Does anyone out there know of any game or occult article
appraisers? I would hate to sell this item only to find out
it was very rare and worth more.
It is in good condition, with a maple veneer front and back. No
planchette came with it.
Any info, let me know, Thanks, Kristin
|
8.261 | Answers please | POBOX::BAJUS_K | | Sat Jan 20 1990 01:39 | 9 |
| Hello,
I have been thinking about trying this for some time. I guess I
just have to know for myself if something from another world exist.
I am afraid from all of the responses that I have read but am still
consumed with the thought of using it. I wonder what is out there
and must once and for all find out for myself if there is more than
I am aware of. Can anyone offer me any info about how to go about
contacting someone from beyond. It would scare the heck out of me
but I just have to know!
|
8.262 | BE CAREFULL | JGO::HANSSEN | | Tue Feb 20 1990 08:44 | 29 |
| react 261
There are several ways for contacting the "others." Some of them will
be already bescribed somewhere in this conference. I have used till
now, three methods ;
- the ouija-bord.
- making a cross out of two pieces of wood. A nail right in the
center of the cross, with the point sticking out. Write on a little
paper the letters of the alphabet, the figures 0 - 9 and yes and
no. Let four people put one side of the cross above the spot were
the letters and figures are. The nail will touch the papers, when
the "others" answer.
- using a glass. Put your finger ( at least 3 people) on a glass
on a table. Use the figures and letters and put them in a circle.
Yes and no on opposite sides. The glass will slide for answers.
WARNING !
Watch out carefully. Do not do any of this method if you don't feel
you can do it. I believe that we all have an inside mechanism that
warns you to do this or not. If you feel insecure, don't do it.
The powers you call upon you, either your own unconsious or from
outside, can take over control. You need an experienced spiritist,
medium or even an exorcist if you can't keep control !
If you are lucky, nothing will happen. If you are still interested,
only try it out with people who did it before out of interest, not
only for excitement !
Questions ? ^O^
|
8.263 | FIRST TIME | CECV03::LEBEL | | Tue Feb 27 1990 12:13 | 27 |
| Hows everyone doing? I put a few notes in this conference back in
November and December. My user name was SALEM::SMORIN but now I'm at
another DEC in Billerica Ma. Anyways in my last note I said that if
an oppurtunity arose that I would try it out.
Well last Sunday night 2/25/90 that oppurtunity came. I was with a
couple of friends, (Tammy & Greyson) one who had used A ouija-board
before. We were at my house and Tammy brought the ouija-board with
her.
We started by sitting on the floor with a couple of candles lit.
We all sat around the board with our fingers on the board and
concentrated on a white light surrounding us. After about 5 minitues
I asked if there was anyone in the room with us. The planchette
started to move very slowly towards YES. I then asked the spirit
his/her name. It spelled BEN. We asked what year he died. His reply
was 3/14/32. Before we could ask it another question it continued to
spell H E L P. We then asked where he was. He then spelled H E L L.
Well needless to say we were all a little shaken up. None of us new
what to ask it next. The planchette continued to move to the bottom of
the board to goodbye. Thats where the planchette stopped moving. It
was so weird, you could almost sense him leaving the room.
Does anyone have any comments about this experience. I would be very
interested in anything anyone has to say.
Shawn
|
8.264 | Hmmm .... | LESCOM::KALLIS | Pumpkins -- Nature's greatest gift. | Tue Feb 27 1990 14:18 | 30 |
| Re .263 (Shawn):
>I asked if there was anyone in the room with us. The planchette
>started to move very slowly towards YES. ..
> ...
> ... We then asked where he was. He then spelled H E L L. ...
Sounds like "Ben" has a little positional difficulty.
> ... We asked what year he died. His reply was 3/14/32.
"32" could take in a lot of years. (1932, 1832, 1732, ... etc.)
It's hard to check the validity of such an experience. It could
be a real spirit, something passing itself off as a spirit, a form
of telekinesis, etc.
However, accepting "Ben"'s comments at face value (a rash thing
to do), two points:
1) Conventional Hell doesn't come with furloughs. ["Abandon all
hope, ye who enter here.']
2) The question, "How can we help?" might at least have supplied
further data. Whether one wished to act on such data might be
another thing altogether.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
8.265 | Waiting for second experience | CECV03::LEBEL | | Wed Feb 28 1990 11:54 | 13 |
| Steve
The question, "How can we help?" did come into mind but, I could'nt
ask it. I think I was afraid of its reply.
In my last note I did'nt mention that we tried it again afterwards.
This time we talked to some one named RANDAL. Every time we asked it
something, all it did was move from R to E and vice versa. After a
while RANDAL left. Does this mean anything to anyone?
Shawn
|
8.266 | Putting on my skeptics hat. | CADSYS::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Wed Feb 28 1990 12:31 | 16 |
| RE: .263 (Shawn)
I have no way of knowing what caused the events which you experienced
and report in .263, but it does seem worth mentioning that the events
described are completely explainable -- and entirely expected under
the circumstances -- in terms of well understood psychophysiological
principles. These explanations do not in any way require or imply that
you or your companions are or were fraudulent, gullible, stupid,
weak-minded or otherwise wierd. They only require that you be human.
Of course, that events can be conventionally explained does not mean
that the conventional explanation is the correct one, but nothing
you reported would indicate that your experiment didn't simply
demonstrate one of the amazing but well understood characteristics of
the human mind.
Topher
|
8.267 | but,..... | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Thu Mar 01 1990 09:44 | 17 |
|
There are times that I put on my skeptic hat,then,I talk with Jim,my
contact,and,he stuns me with information that I have no knowledge
of,which I have confirmed several times! Well,something here is not
normal. My children dont like the Ouija,because it tells on them! Just
recently Jim told me of some things my children were doing. I
confronted them with it,and,they denied it,until Jim told me exactly
where I could find the evidence. He knew in detail. They know they cant
hide things from Jim. Whether it is a spirit at work here,or,something
else,it is very much paranormal. I allowed a friend of mine to talk
with Jim over the week-end. I was not on the board,just my wife and my
friend. The character did not change. It made no difference,it was
still Jim. Still amazed by it.
Peace
Michael
|
8.268 | | NRADM::COLLETON | magicians do it with their hands! | Thu Mar 01 1990 10:56 | 5 |
| Mike,
Have you tried having someone in your family hiding something
with you not knowing the object or the hiding place and see if
"JIM" can tell you waht and where it is. very interesting.
Bill-
|
8.269 | The watch Ouija.. | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Thu Mar 01 1990 11:32 | 9 |
|
well,no,but,I have had Jim tell me where things were without either my
wife or I knowing about it. Jim told us exactly where our children had
hidden things they didnt want us to see. When confronted with the
facts,they had to reveal it to us,or,we would have found it anyway.
Peace
Michael
|
8.270 | Caveats. | CADSYS::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Thu Mar 01 1990 13:11 | 83 |
| RE: .267 (Michael)
Michael, I am the last person to deny the existence of paranormal
phenomena, nor that the Ouija board may be, at times, a medium by which
such phenomena manifests, but, some points to keep in mind:
- That the personality which manifests through the Ouija board has
access to apparently paranormally obtained information does not mean
that the personality is distinct from the Ouija board's operators.
People seem to be able to subconsciously tap into paranormal sources of
information without any sign of intervention or mediation by
disincarnate personalities. (I know from previous discussions with you
Michael that you understand this; I am making this point for others.
- That paranormal manifestations for some operators, boards, sessions,
etc. occurs does not imply that such paranormal manifestations are
universal or even common in using the Ouija board. The evidence is
quite overwhelming that most personalities which manifest through the
Ouija board are products of the operator's subconscious (NOTE: this does
*not* make them savory characters, nor does it make playing games with
your own subconscious a harmless game). These personalities have much
the same "reality status" and independence as the people you meet in
dreams -- they are quite independent of your "consciousness" but they
are not independent of "you". The question is not whether or not the
Ouija board generally produces paranormal phenomena nor whether the Ouija
board generally communicates paranormal information -- those issues
are both strongly settled to the negative. The question is whether
there are exceptional positive answers among the vast majority of
negative ones.
- I was commenting on a specific incident. There was absolutely
nothing in that report to distinguish it from the majority of Ouija
experiences which are produced by conventional (but not simple)
subconscious mechanisms. I realize that the "I am in Hell" answer is
one familiar to you from your interactions with Jim, but it is
essentially a "stock answer" -- Heaven or Hell are the only answers
that are really expected by people with a Christian background (even if
they have consciously placed that background behind them), and Hell
fits with most operators feelings of tampering with the forbidden.
Whether or not it is true for Jim, it is the answer which one would
expect to be the most frequent from subconsciously generated
personalities.
- If any of the operators already knew Jim, then it is completely to be
expected that Jim's personality would remain substantially intact with
the introduction of a new operator. I know your wife has previously
met Jim, so this really gives no evidence for his independent
existence. If Jim were to manifest for a set of operators none of whom
had ever met him -- preferably without any of Jim's aquaintences
present -- and Jim's personality were identifiable under double-blind
conditions from transcripts, then there would be evidence (not proof,
but good evidence) of Jim's independence.
- I can't emphasize this enough. A fact known by any of the operators
will be expected to be known by the Ouija personality. Anything which
any of the operators knew, or might have known, at any previous time,
even if they have consciously forgotten it, and even if they have
consciously forgotten having once known it; might easily be known to
the Ouija personality. Anything which might be deduced or guessed at
by the operators on the basis of any piece of consiously remembered,
forgotten, noticed or unnoticed information, even if it would take a
"genius" to do so, might be deduced or guessed by the Ouija personality
(which is why I refer to him/her as the "Sherlock Holmes in your
Head").
- Generally *anyone present in the room*, whether or not they are in
contact with the planchette, *can be considered to be operators*. The
Ouija board is marvelously designed for unconscious playing of "hot-
warm-cold." Is it amazing that two people can use the Ouija in that
way to communicate highly detailed knowledge without either being
consciously aware of it? Without question -- conventional human
capabilities are truely amazing. Does that imply that anything
paranormal is taking place? Absolutly not! If your children were
not present when Jim revealed where the evidence was than this incident
*might* be evidence for paranormality (depending on how unlikely it
would be for a very, very smart and observant person to deduce or
guess). If your children were present than, no matter how amazing, it
is not evidence for paranormality (NOTE: once more, that it is not
evidence of paranormality does not mean that it is not paranormal, only
that we do not have a basis for distinguishing it from conventional
phenomena).
Topher
|
8.271 | ok,but... | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Thu Mar 01 1990 15:29 | 12 |
|
Yes,Topher,I am aware of your viewpoints,and,I agree with the major
parts of them. I also however,have experienced some things that I would
consider to be paranormal. The imformation we were given about the
children was given when they were not present. We confronted them later
with the facts. Neither my wife or I had any idea or suspicion that
anything was going on. This happens on a regular basis,and,not while
they are present. If not paranormal,then,a very good case for it.
Peace
Michael
|
8.272 | how about this ? | JGO::HANSSEN | | Fri Mar 09 1990 05:06 | 36 |
| re .270
Hi Topher,
I can follow your comments and I believe in many cases you are right.
Many times I did it I had the same idea as you have. There were
however some exceptions ;
Once we had a spirit who gave a full name and adress ( the house
where we did our seance), job and date of dying. He gave us very
detailled description of the surroundings, only from about a 100
year before. He told some amazing things and also said he could
see our future. Sceptic as I was, I asked him were I would be the
next day at 3.00 A.M. He gave an answer I really couldn't believe,
my plans were completely different. But, you understand already,
next day I was sitting at 3.00 o'clock sitting on the place he
mentioned. It was in a pub were a very old clock was hanging...And
at three the thing did bang-bang-bang (as it should do). Only, the
barkeeper said that the thing hadn't worked for ages....And I had
forgotten what the spirit had said, untill that moment....
Still I believed it would be my own or others subconsious untill
somebody found out that name and adress and job did exist ! Somebody,
not attending the seance had searched that for us. And speaking
later to older people I found out that the description of the
surroundings also was fabulous.....Also other details of the house
we found out later ( and no one of us could know) appeared to be
right....
The other moment was the time when a girl, did ouija for the first
time. At first laughing and believing it was all nuts...but suddenly
she looked very serious and got very pale. I described this moment
in another note TERZA::PSYCHOLOGY. I had the feeling that a unknown
power had "taken her over." I really had to concentrate ( don't
ask me how I did that) to let the force disappear.....
For me a reason to stop with the ouija. Frightened that I can't
control it next time.....
John ^O^
|
8.273 | Good stories thanks, ... | CADSYS::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Fri Mar 09 1990 11:52 | 72 |
| RE: .272 (John ^O^)
- Let me reiterate. I believe that there do exist phenomena which have
to be described at the present time as "paranormal" (meaning we
fundamentally do not understand them). These existence of some of
these phenomena, specifically ESP and PK, have been established under
rigorous laboratory conditions. These studies indicate that these
phenomena are best described as *subconscious* abilities. Since the
Ouija board seems to be a fairly effective method of tapping into
certain aspects of the subconscious -- manifesting by the creation
of artificial, subconscious personalities -- it is not only possible,
but even probable that paranormal phenomena, specifically ESP, may
sometimes manifest. That is, I would expect that the subconscious
personalities manifest in the Ouija board would be able, *occasionally*
to use information obtained via ESP to support the illusion (which, in
some sense, they share) of their independent existence.
I do not, therefore, in any way, deny or question that the Ouija may
occasionally be the medium for the manifestation of paranormal
phenomena.
- However, you should also know that there is much, much more that we
can know or guess subconsciously than we consciously know we know.
There is no way to rule out the possability that all the information
about the surroundings 100 years ago came from hints and guesses that
you were completely unaware of: a newspaper article which you don't
remember reading -- or which was visible to you for a while even though
you didn't, consciously, read it; subtle discolorings and bumps in the
walls indicating old positions of furniture, doorways, walls etc.;
old woodcuts casually seen; conversations not consciously overheard;
general deductions on the basis of general knowledge of the period
which you have consciously forgotten; etc., etc., etc.. Remember that
there is a Sherlock Holmes living in your head.
- Since you give no details of how your plans ended up changing its a
bit hard for us to know how much weight to give to the incident of
you ending up in the pub. If you could have subtly or not-so-subtly
influenced the probability of you being in the pub at that time, then
there is absolutely nothing to explain. It should be no surprise that
the subconscious can effect our actions without our being aware of it.
It seems rather significant to me that you *did not* remember the
prediction from just the night before.
- Again it is rather hard to judge just how much weight to give to the
clock incident. Amazing coincidences happen all the time. It is
astoundingly unlikely that a particular astoundingly unlikely event
will occur, but it is almost certain that out of the many, many
astoundingly unlikely events which could happen, that some *will*
happen. On the other hand, it might be a legitimate example of PK.
- Overall the evidence is only moderate that anything paranormal took
place here (at least on the basis of what you have reported). Even
if something paranormal did take place, then I see no strong evidence
that a completely independent personality was involved.
- Once again -- lack of evidence is not the same of evidence of lack. I
don't know whether or not there was paranormal phenomena involved, and
if so whether or not an independent "spirit" was involved. But, so
far at least, you have given me only a weak reason to believe the
former and virtually no reason to beleive the latter.
- As far as the apparent brief "possession": I have said it before,
that most (all?) Ouija personalities are products of the subconscious
does not make it safe to muck with them. Nothing you said makes
me believe that the "possesing spirit" was external to her, but that
does not make the "possesion" any less likely a serious incident. On
the other hand, nothing you said has excluded that she was only
suffering a momentary muscular spasm or a petit mal seizure (which she
might suffer periodically without you being aware of) or whatever.
Your "feelings" count a great deal -- but not as evidence.
Topher
|
8.274 | Still my doubts.... | JGO::HANSSEN | | Mon Mar 12 1990 04:47 | 40 |
| re.273 (Topher)
Hi Topher,
I hope you didn't red my reply to you as an offense, I'm still
brainstorming myself. I think you have a point there, a point I
see often in this conference. It is very difficult to find evidence
that could give the one and right answer to these phenomena. It
stays guessing and interpretating things that occur to us.
I found it a pity to write down my story (.272), so many extra
information got lost by writing in stead of telling it to you.
Let me be clear to you, I really believe that most of the ouija
experiences are from the subconsious. But some incidents make me
doubt a lot. If I understand you well, it's the same with you, right
I cannot let to tell another story. Not to offend but to give you
more info about my doubts.
Once I attended a seance as observer. You know, a group of older
ladies, coming together once a week to ask questions like ; "will
I be in love again, when do I die and so on." The answers however
were always very diplomatic and sometimes very funny. Suddenly the
boyfriend of the daughter of the house appeared ( not on the table
ofcourse). The spirit said he had a message for that guy. He didn't
believe the whole theatre so he asked what it was. "Your Mother
is dead !" Well, it wasn't a secret that the woman was very ill.
But she was improving, and the boy, just returning from the hospital
got very angry." I can't laugh with these jokes, tell me, great
ghost, what's the name of the doctor who controlled that ?" The
answer was dr X ( I don't remember). The boy replied :"You see it's
a lie, only a quarter of an hour ago the only doctor was dr Y.
Exactly on that moment dr X called to tell him that his mother died...
Dr Y had to visit somebody suddenly and X had just arrived to replace
Y. You can imagine how the boy felt. He never deared to come in
the house when the ladies were meeting........
I know, also in this story it could be possible that the subconsiouses
were working. Especially people who just die cab sent out very strong
messages..... But, something made me doubt much.....
OK, for so far,
still thinking but also giving best greetings,
John ^0^
|
8.275 | You'll have to still them for yourself... | CADSYS::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Mon Mar 12 1990 14:50 | 58 |
| RE: .274 (John ^0^)
> I hope you didn't read my reply to you as an offense,
Not at all -- if anything just the opposite. Someone who is willing
to discuss these issue and provide data in the form of there own
experiences is doing me a favor. Even if they don't entirely agree
with me (which I'm not sure is the case for you).
It seems to me there are several issues:
1) Does the planchette move the operator's hand, or does the operator's
hand (without the operators conscious knowledge) move the
planchette?
2) Are the personalities manifest in Ouija sessions external to the
operators (e.g., they are spirits of the dead, or are demons) or
are they sophisticated manifestations of the operators'
subconsciouses?
3) Is the information presented in a Ouija board session obtained from
conventional sources or is it obtained paranormally.
All three of these questions need to be answered in terms of frequency:
"always thus", "almost always thus", "sometimes thus" "never thus" etc.
In my opinion the evidence is very strong that the "conventional"
answer is correct almost all the time.
The major evidence that the Ouija personalities are "spirits" rather
than manifestations of the operator's subconscious is that they are
able to present information which the operator could only have obtained
paranormally. Sidestepping the issue of how very, very difficult it
is to rule out conventional sources of information, we nevertheless
know both from spontaneous instances and laboratory studies, that
people seem to be able to obtain information paranormally without the
apparent need for the intervention of spirits.
The argument then comes down to claims that the amount or coherence of
the information rules out ESP. But we know virtually nothing about
the limits of ESP. Until we understand it better (something which I
am trying to do) arguments based on its supposed limits are weak at
best. Furthermore, given the support of the conventional mechanisms
which the "skeptics" try to force into explaining all such phenomena,
the amount or coherence of the information may not be that high.
While I am willing (even anxious) to be convinced otherwise, I think
that the Ouija board simply provides an outlet for subconscious
personalities to express themselves. They almost always use
information obtained in conventional ways, although sometimes the
conventional ways are extremely subtle. Occasionally, the
subconsciously generated personalities add small amounts of
paranormally obtained information to support the illusion of their
independence.
None of the cases you described seem at variance with these beliefs.
Topher
|
8.276 | HOW...... | JGO::HANSSEN | | Tue Mar 13 1990 04:17 | 22 |
| Hi Topher,
There is a point in what you say. My problem is, how can we put
up some good evidence in that. In all the sessions I did I tried
this, but as you saw there is always some sort of explanation.
Only, an explanation is an interpretation, and not a waterproof
evidence.... I studied parapsychology and stopped because I had
to deal with two ways of looking at phenomena ; one who just did
research on telepathy by putting someone in a room. In the room
next door someone would draw something and the guessing was a fact.
When somebody scored more than the statistical chance (don't ask
me what) he was paranormal ( watch the word ; here it means every
phenomena which has no scientifical explanation (then telepathy
wasn't scientifical evidence as now). The other group was against
the way science is doing research on the world. Instead of trying
to set up an alternative they dived away in philosophy. Interesting
but no base to put your theory on.....
For that reason I only believe now what I feel. Believing your feelings
is for me a way to look at the world, not the truth.....
Sorry have to stop, I continue later....
John ^O^
|
8.277 | cont. story, part 2 | JGO::HANSSEN | | Tue Mar 13 1990 07:17 | 23 |
| Back again.....
What I wanted to tell is, you state that the evidence clearly is
pointing to the subconsious. In many situations I believe it could
be so ( because I feel it that way) in other I'm not sure. The evidence
is not clear to me, it doesn't prove anything. The evidence doesn't
give any direction if we are dealing with a other "entity" or the
subconsious of a living human being. I wish it would be that clear.
That's the reason why we try to explain these things, but the actual
truth ? Who knows. Or do you have clear evidence to state the
subconsious of the operator is actually the source ? Please, let
me know....
Something else I didn't write here yet is that the Ouija-bord isn't
used much here in the Netherlands. Instead of that we use a turned
glass and put our fingers on it. So more people can join and the
control (muscle-movements, or the touch of the glass) is better.
Doing this with serious people, while others watch, is a way of
controlling someone's pushing ( don't care un- or consious).
Around the glass we have spreaded the alphabet, numbers and the
words yes and no. Sometimes the glide is so fast you can hardly
follow which letters it's pointing.........
Has anyone suggestions how we can improve our evidence ?
still thinking......John ^O^
|
8.278 | brief reply. | CADSYS::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Tue Mar 13 1990 15:57 | 11 |
| RE: .277 (John ^0^)
I'd like to answer more fully when I have a chance, but as for:
> Has anyone suggestions how we can improve our evidence ?
There has been a lot of thought put into experiments intended to
demonstrate post-mortem survival. I direct your attention to note
1105 where one test is discussed.
Topher
|
8.279 | no revenge ! | JGO::HANSSEN | | Wed Mar 14 1990 09:24 | 6 |
| re.278 (Topher)
Just a quick and dirty from my side ( I am not playing the game
you answer short, I answer short). It's because I have a meeting
What do you think of 1205 ?
Hope to get soon back on you, ciao...
|
8.280 | Without "venge", how can there be REvenge? | CADSYS::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Thu Mar 15 1990 10:47 | 12 |
| RE: .279 (John O^O)
I think that it is an excellent example of a apparition phenomena, and
a touching story as well. But except that the visual channel is a bit
more resistant (but far from completely resistant) to such overt messages
from the subconscious, I don't see that it is evidentially any
different from Ouija board experiences with possible paranormal
content.
(Sorry, for my continued brevity -- I'm really bogged down with work).
Topher
|
8.281 | ^O^ not O^O, flying not glassing | JGO::HANSSEN | | Fri Mar 16 1990 09:32 | 17 |
| re .280 (Topher)
How do you know I wear glasses ?!
You are really tough, aren't you ? But let me still trying to turn
the getting evidence around. For me the 1105 was no evidence
enough...You have very logical interpretation and explanation, but
still not the hard evidence that these phenomena are from the human
subconsious. In the 1105, I think someone living and strongly telepatic
could find it out.......
On the other hand I'm very impressed about the unexplored powers
of the human mind. I can imagine that we are able to do much more
than we actually know.
In any case, Topher, thanks for your inputs. I think we will meet
again in this topic or conference, right ?
I have to work now too .......I have to watch not to loose to much
time here in notes !
Wish you a good weekend...John ^O^
|
8.282 | roll up roll up | SUBURB::ABSOLOMT | | Thu Aug 09 1990 07:16 | 5 |
| Any U.K noters know how I can get hold of a board.???
Good money paid.
p.s I am very experienced in this field!!
|
8.283 | | USAT05::KASPER | Being dreamed by the BIG Dream | Thu Aug 09 1990 11:25 | 7 |
| This should probably go in a humor note somewhere but...
I heard a short piece by Howie Mandell. He said he went to a
restaurant called "The Ouija". His comment, "The food was great
but the tables kept moving around".
Terry
|
8.284 | | UGOTIT::REPRO | | Wed Nov 14 1990 17:26 | 9 |
|
The closest I've come to speaking with evil on the board is, once,
when I asked who we were speaking to, the planchette moved to D..E..V
and then my friend and I immediately removed our hands!
Does anyone know if it is bad to use the Ouija board too much?
Someone told me you shouldn't use it every day. Just wondering.
CG
|
8.285 | Ouji board fears | SUBWAY::FORSYTH | LAFALOT | Wed Nov 14 1990 20:39 | 29 |
| I have never written (or talked) about Ouji boards, because I only ever
did anything with one when I was about 12. I was with my sister and
cousin (female - so am I) and my cousin brough out the board. I don't
remember any of the question we asked except one: I asked "how old will
I be when I get married?" I remember this question, and I remember the
answer, AND...I rememeber "testing" by having all of us take our
fingers off at the same time.....AND IT KEPT MOVING FOR A SECOND OR
TWO! I was NEVER so scared....I "tested" right after I got the answer
to my question..it answered "23"...being 12, that was an eternity. But
I never forgot.
When I was 22 I met a man that I REALLY liked, and for the 1st time in
my life I was a tiny bit ggressive. He started going out. My first
REAL love....and lover. Well, he dumped me after 1 year....he had been
engaged to another woman since 2 months AFTER we started seeing each
other. He never told me (she was in another state) until 6 months
later....I worked with him so I quit my job. I WOULD have married
him..he admitted he wasn't in love with me at first, but really was at
the end....long story (she pressured him, he thought I was "too quick"
(mentally) for him (ANGER!!!!!!) ..etc) anyway, I WAS 23!! Butsine he
dumped me (thank God, in retrospect)..it's been 3 more years and no
go..marriage wise.
I waited 11 years for that D*MN Ouji board prediction, only to say a!
You were wrong!
Sorry for babbling...but I was SO SCARED, that I believed it for 11
years.... was I a total jerk or what?
|
8.286 | | SUBWAY::FORSYTH | LAFALOT | Wed Nov 14 1990 20:42 | 3 |
| RE .-1 sorry for the typos....evidently the noise on this modem line
has a mind of it's own when it "accepts" my reply.
|
8.287 | | XLIB::JACKSON | Collis Jackson | Fri Dec 14 1990 11:16 | 2 |
| Just read the two previous Ouija board experiences. Even if I weren't
a Christian, it sounds like you're playing with fire.
|
8.288 | Who's there? | POBOX::FREICHELS | | Mon Dec 17 1990 15:38 | 10 |
| could someone tell me how you can find out the name of the spirit of a
particular board? We've been able to call up a spirit from another
friend's board, and he tells us which spirits are evil. But I've been
too scared to just ask "Who is the spirit of this board?" because I've
heard that it spells out S-A-T-A-N. Is this true?
Thanks!
Jennifer
|
8.289 | ask them directly | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Tue Dec 18 1990 06:35 | 12 |
|
Jennifer,
You may,or,may not,get an answer. Be direct,and,ask their name. If
you dont,they will play along and make it a game. The main thing is to
show a genuine interest in who they are. If they answer by saying
Satan,then,continue to ask who "they" are,really.
Peace
Michael
|
8.290 | more questions | POBOX::FREICHELS | | Tue Dec 18 1990 15:04 | 21 |
| Thank you for your answer. I have another question. If it does say
Satan, that doesn't mean it is an "evil spirit"? How can you tell if
the spirit is evil? We always surround ourselves with light, and when
Rick, a spirit that we've befriended, is on the board, we know because
he shows us a sign that we have. He also gave us nicknames, so we know
for sure when we are talking to him. But when the planchette starts
moving differently, we get kind of scared because there are some
spirits that aren't all that friendly. When a spirit spells out Satan,
we get off the board.
Also, is it possible for a spirit to try to warn one of the people on
the board of the other person on the board. I was on the board with a
girl that I haven't always gotten along with. Rick wouldn't answer any
questions, and instead asked, "Lori (the girl), who do you hate?" At
that point the phone rang. My friend got on with me, and immediately
the board spelled out Andrew, which is who was on the phone when Lori
answered it. After Lori was off the board, it spelled out EVIL, and
BEWARE. My friends who were there with me told me later that they
thought Rick was trying to warn me about Lori. What do you think?
Jennifer
|
8.291 | | DNEAST::PUSHARD_MIKE | | Wed Dec 19 1990 07:00 | 22 |
|
Jennifer,
If you havnt already,I would suggest you read all the notes in here
on this subject. The answers to your questions is there. There are many
notes about this,so,it may take you a while,but,will give you a lot to
think about. IMO,anything you are told by these spirits should be
tested and questioned. Dont let them lead you on unless there is solid
hard evidence of the truth. They may not like your friend,for one
reason or another and want to start trouble. These spirits are
individuals,and,should be dealt with as you would deal with people you
would meet here in the physical world. Each one will have a different
personality and operate the planchette differently. You will be able to
tell their moods by the way the pointer moves,sometimes very
energetic,sometimes slow methotical,sometimes quick,agitated,missing
letters. It is very interesting,but,use your head,dont let them be in
control,you be in control.
Peace
Michael
|
8.292 | "Ouija" Good Reading! | RAVEN1::ADAMS_A | UNOYIPACA9 | Thu Jan 17 1991 18:35 | 14 |
| Just wanted to say Thanks! to all of the people that participated
in this note file. I had only one experience with the ouija and was
to young to remember what happened. I think we were just playing
around. I'm very facinated about the board but not enough to buy
my on board. Maybe one day I'll try it, but I'm not in any hury.
It makes interesting reading, from .1 to .291. Again thanks
for the stories.
Later,
***************
* *
* Awesome Ant *
* *
***************
|
8.293 | A question regarding the planchette | CGHUB::LAPIN | | Wed Apr 24 1991 18:00 | 10 |
| I have a question. The planchette I have has a hole in it covered by
a clear piece of plastic. The plastic has a small hole in it the size
of a pinhole. When I borrowed this board, the brass tack that origi-
nally came with the planchette was missing. I tried replacing it first
with a straight pin, then a plastic-covered metal tack. I got
absolutely no response from the board. Can anyone tell me if that
brass tack is mandatory to receiving a response or does it not matter?
L.
|
8.294 | Its just a pointing device. | DNEAST::BERLINGER_MA | LIFE IN THE ASTRAL PLANE | Thu Apr 25 1991 13:14 | 13 |
| re..293
As I understand it the brass tack is just a pointer
device to help in determining which letter or number is indicated.
I further understand that a simple inverted (stem type) wine glass
will work too.
Later,
Mark
|
8.295 | ready to try | WLDWST::KAPELLER | | Sat May 04 1991 05:41 | 15 |
| Hello,
I've been reading this file with great interest. My husband used a
weejee before I met him, he said he has contacted his best friend and
blood brother, Mark, Mark shot himself last october and says he has to
stay here and learn what he did wrong. My question, my husband is an
alchohlic and drug addict, we are both clean and sober now for a while,
I have brought up trying to contact Mark again, but was wondering if
something other than Mark was contacting my husband at the time since
his mind and body where in such bad shape and maybe he didn't realize
it. Can we decide who we want to reach and has anyone else heard of a
spirit staying here to learn?
Thanks,
Caroline
|
8.296 | no garantee | UTROP2::HANSSEN_J | | Tue Jun 11 1991 09:54 | 17 |
| re .295
Hi Caroline,
it's nice to see that you can ask a question and answer it yourself :
it could be possible that you had the right spirit, it could also be
another one. You never no, you have no facts who can tell....
I always try to find out what I feel. I mean, if I feel well, I think I
have a friendly spirit. If I feel bad, I stop immediately.....but a
100% garantee, no way.......
I have heard from people who indeed did stupid things, after they did
ouija.....others got mentally sick......
So I can only say, don't rely to much unless you are absolutely sure...
Hope this helps......
John ^O^
|
8.297 | Another OUIJA tale.. | HURON::TAYLOR | | Thu Jan 02 1992 15:44 | 13 |
|
During the holidays I brought up the topic of the Ouija board and I
heard an interesting story.
Apparently , my friends were camping this past summer in northern NH.
They had been using the board while sitting around the campfire one
evening. They apparently had been conversing with a spirit. They had
asked many questions of it and finally, almost jokingly asked it to
show itself. The next message from the board said "Grey Fox" and this
is the truth, a moment later a Grey Fox (which is quite rare to appear
near humans) walked through their camp and then back into the woods !
Todd
|
8.298 | as told to me | FUTURS::JACKSON | | Tue Jan 21 1992 07:26 | 24 |
| This is an experience as related to me by a friend. When she was
married and living in London, England herself and her husband along
with another couple would often use the Ouija board. She said they
almost always got a response especially if she was present and was
asking the questions. While they never really took it seriously always
doing it 'for a laugh', once she said they all took their fingers off
the glass and it carried on moving. They never had any real thought
provoking experiences until one night when asking the 'spirit' where
he lived the reply was 'in a house built on this land before the house
they were in as built' - last century some time. They then asked
personnal details about his name, birth/death date and how he could
prove it was true, he said he was buried at the bottom of the garden
and there should be a headstone there. They all laughed after this
but after a couple of days as there was no headstone at the bottom
of the garden decided to dig it up and found the headstone with the
details given. I can only vouch for the person who related the
experience to me as obviously one of the others could have set the
whole thing up by burying such a headstone in the night, but it was
quite a thought provoking experience.
regards
Lewis
|
8.299 | I've met a ghost !!! | LARVAE::GULLEY_G | Gillian Gulley | Thu Apr 16 1992 12:00 | 20 |
| Guys
I believe in : telepathy, premonitions, ouji boards and ghosts. I only believe
because I have experienced all four at close quarters.
I also believe in life and really enjoying the few years we get to spend on this
planet. I've seen death up close and believe me life is sweet.
What I do not believe is the absolute fascination many of you seem to have with
death and evil forces, while I do not dispute that they exist I would really
appreciate it if you would LIGHTEN UP A LITTLE.
Less of the Doom and Gloom please guys ?
Gillian
|
8.300 | Doom and ...? | HELIX::KALLIS | Pumpkins -- Nature's greatest gift | Thu Apr 16 1992 12:19 | 16 |
| Re .299 (Gillian):
I believe the responses are less "doom and gloom" than cautionary. The problem
with a Ouija board, to take that first, is that it's highly unselective.
"Is anybody there?" isn't very specific (at least in a standard seance, the
medium looks for a specific entity such as the proverbial "Uncle Charlie").
With respect to ghosts, I suppose some want to make sure that what they're
encountering is really a ghost rather than something else masquerading as one.
(Hamlet had a similar concern in Willie Shakespeare's drama of that name.)
Telepathy and premonition are inherently subjective experiences.
SWho hasn't lightened up?
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
8.301 | Keep digging. | STRATA::RUDMAN | Always the Black Knight. | Mon May 04 1992 00:34 | 24 |
| re: .298
Lewis, why did they stop digging??? Speculation on whether the
headstone was a "plant" is one thing, but human remains, now that's
something else, considering an M.E. would get involved, and etc.
I understand about possibly not wanting to disturb someone's remains
(especially when you've just spoken with him), but this seems to be yet
another instance of not taking an event to its logical conclusion to
give a more completeness to a paranormal occurance.
I just realized something: I've been maintaining nothing paranormal
(or extraterrestrial, for that matter) would ever happen to me as
I either "just miss it" or whatever was supposed to happen doesn't
happen when I'm there (I've also been accused of having "negative
vibes"; that is, my skepticism prevents the occurance or angers the
"powers that be" to refuse to perform), but the last two Ouija Board
stories caused me to make the connection to an exprience involving
an Ouija Board, a slightly "spooky dude", and a Dark and Stormy night
'way back in 1969. The ol' memory is a bit hazy on the details, so
I'll have to work at it to put it all together & post it here. (If
I haven't already; after all, this *is* Dejavu.)
Don
|
8.302 | Nasty Business? | SUBURB::TAYLORJ | | Tue Jun 30 1992 12:09 | 46 |
|
There have been a few enquiries as to what unpleasantries can occur
when things don't go exactly as hoped for. I have one story that may
interest those who are curious and/or worried about using the board.
A group of youngsters, some of whom had used the board before with
varying degrees of success, got together one evening and after a period
of absolute silence from the board established contact with an
individual who literally burst in on them. The story has it that he had
the same effect on them as a bull in a china shop. Apparently he was
the victim of a fatal motorcycling accident and was really very angry
at having his physical life snuffed out so quickly. The contact was
immediately aggressive and threatening, and the youngsters were aware
of a presence in the room with them. They broke off the contact and
later got rid of the board, however the contact did not end there. The
aggressor managed to keep the "channel" open and began to pick on one
lad who had been present at the ouija meeting. Over the next few months
this boy was subjected to threatening behaviour; crockery flying off
shelves at him, stumbling down stairwells, and feeling a threatening
presence in his room with him at night. Bad enough an experience for
anyone, especially a young child. It would seem that the aggressor had
decided to "hound" the boy, and apparently this lasted for a long time
before gradually subsiding in frequency.
I read this account in a reference book on the paranormal, and the
above transcript is obviously somewhat compressed. It struck me how
much it resembled the poltergeist film "The Entity" (I think, anyway!).
Whatever the similarities and however credible the story is (I wouldn't
stake my life on it), it does point to the possibility that just because
an operator may sever a contact doesn't mean that the "spirit"
contacted has to follow suite, especially if you have contacted a
powerful entity, or are inexperienced. As far as potentially bad or
hazardous occurences I would suggest that if you are a new or novice
user of the ouija you would not realise that something might be about
to go wrong. This may well be one of the most worried about parts of
experimenting with the board.
Thus, perhaps it may not be such a good idea to try it unless you are
confident that you can handle what you are doing; it may be that this
confidence is what "wards off" potential troublemakers. Whether you
give the above story any credibility or not, it would be interesting to
hear peoples opinions on points raised here.
Jeremy
|
8.303 | how young was this boy? | HELIX::KALLIS | Pumpkins ... Nature's greatest gift. | Tue Jun 30 1992 12:45 | 12 |
| Re .302 (Jeremy):
>I read this account in a reference book on the paranormal, and the
>above transcript is obviously somewhat compressed. It struck me how
>much it resembled the poltergeist film "The Entity" (I think, anyway!).
_The Entity_ was the story of a woman who was repeatedly and brutally
raped by an invisible [and possibly demonic] being. The film is
unpleasant, though the edited-for-television version isn't too bad.
Did anything of that ilk happen to the boy in question?
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
8.304 | Not as bad as that!! | SUBURB::TAYLORJ | | Tue Jun 30 1992 13:27 | 24 |
| Re. 303
Glad to see that someone's still watching! This conference started many
moons ago and so I doubted whether people would still be writing in by
1992.
No, memory tells me that the boy wasn't molested sexually, although he
was subjected to lesser physical assault (flying objects, things thrown
through his windows, etc) and, at least at the beginning, a virtually
continuous torrent of intimidatory behaviour. Not pleasant. The most
violent action by the aggressor was to "seize" the boys hands whilst he
was riding his bike and jerk the handle-bars out of his grip. I know
that a number of my freinds have also heard of this story, but they
understand that the boys family moved from their house, believing it to
be haunted and the aggressor followed them; I'm not sure about that,
however........
The boy in question was in his early teens, which would tie in with
the theory the poltergeist activity centres around adolescents; in this
case possibly triggered by fear, so resulting in a series of aggressive
subconcious incidents. Alternatively the aggressor could have been a
very real threat. The account written in the story was slightly
sensationalised, but based on fact.
|
8.305 | Ouija on Halloween | COMET::FARMERA | | Fri Sep 25 1992 14:37 | 13 |
| Some friends and I are planning to have a Ouija session on
Halloween. The site we have chosen is VERY close to a grave-yard that
dates back to the 1800's. Many who are interned there died from
cholera, exposure, Indians, gunfights and animal attacks. Colorado was
a very tough place to live in when it was still part of the Kansas
territory. Does anyone have any opinion, facts, stories or anythings
else they can share on the subject of a Halloween Oujia session and\or
performing it near an old grave-yard?
Thanks,
Drew...
|
8.306 | recommendation against .305 | SITBUL::GRIFFIN | Practice random kindness and senseless acts of beauty | Fri Sep 25 1992 15:32 | 7 |
|
On contacting the spirits of the dead in general: wait until AFTER
midnight. Given what possibly is occurring on this night, plus the
general risks involved with a Ouija board, makes this a BAD plan unless
you really know what you are doing.
Beth
|
8.307 | Danger... | STUDIO::GUTIERREZ | I'm on my break. Do you care..? | Fri Sep 25 1992 15:56 | 12 |
|
I agree and second the motion of .306,
unless you are thoroughly familiar with
the inhabitants and risks of the Astral plane,
which are the ones you will be contacting, you
are putting yourself at risk by doing that.
Of course, the ultimate decision is yours,
you know the saying: You can take a horse
to the water, but you can't make him drink.
|
8.308 | | WMOIS::CONNELL | and still the balefire FLASHES! | Fri Sep 25 1992 16:36 | 14 |
| I agree with the others. Using a Ouija Board on All-Hallows Eve, in a
graveyard, especially one with a history of death to the inhabitants by
illness, or violence, is IMHO very dangerous. You leave yourself open
to all sorts of things by doing this.
You know, I was just thinking, (don't laugh gang. I have been known to
occasionally practice this method of coming up with ideas.) One of the
reasons for the danger of Ouija Boards might be that when one is using
it, chances are that one has not cast the proper protective spells or
wards or circles. This leaves a person open to all sorts of nasties.
If this has been stated before, then I apologize. It just came unbidden
into my brain.
PJ
|
8.309 | Suspicious | CADSYS::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Fri Sep 25 1992 16:47 | 7 |
| RE: .308 (PJ)
> It just came unbidden into my brain.
From where I wonder? :-)
Topher
|
8.310 | | WMOIS::CONNELL | and still the balefire FLASHES! | Fri Sep 25 1992 17:06 | 4 |
| Topher, probably from where most of my thoughts come from. Some dank,
dark, disgusting, rat infested sewer. :-)
PJ
|
8.311 | Oh! That explains a *LOT*! (;^) (;^) | TNPUBS::PAINTER | worlds beyond this | Fri Sep 25 1992 17:23 | 1 |
|
|
8.312 | | WMOIS::CONNELL | and still the balefire FLASHES! | Fri Sep 25 1992 17:56 | 3 |
| Thank you Cindy. :-)
PJ
|
8.313 | Book | COMET::FARMERA | | Wed Oct 07 1992 11:26 | 7 |
| Can anyone tell me anything about the book "Ouija, The Dangerous
Game"? Any info would be helpful.
Thanks
Drew
|
8.314 | Has anyone heard from Drew? | DNEAST::BERLINGER_MA | LIFE IN THE ASTRAL PLANE | Tue Nov 17 1992 11:55 | 9 |
|
Drew,
What did you decide?
Later,
Mark
|
8.315 | Interesting night | COMET::FARMERA | HISTORICAL AMBIGUITIES | Wed Dec 09 1992 11:01 | 20 |
| We were unable to use the Ouija on Halloween night. Our friends
could not find baby-siters for their kids on that night and my wife
and I did not wish to "go it alone". We had a site near an old(very
old) graveyard in a house that should be on a Hollywood set! It was
dissapointing not to be able to work with the Ouija on that particular
night so we vowed to do it in the near future. A few of my old college
friends showed up a couple of weeks ago and were really "gung Ho" so to
speak. To cut a long story short, it was very intriguing.(sp?) Im not
prepared to say what happened that night except to say that my, as
well as everyones present, heartbeat reached upper subsonic levels.
It was quite an experience. I now know why my sisters threw theirs
away. Im not ready to go to that extreme yet, but I thought about it.
I don't think anything bad/evil happened on a long term level. But the
night was something that made you go, "Hmmmm, now why would he/she/it
say that? Anyway, sorry I didn't write in this file for awhile, like I
said before, I'm not really ready to talk openly about it yet.
Thanks
Drew
|
8.316 | | GOLF::JANOWSKI | CitizensAgainstContinentalDrift | Wed Dec 09 1992 11:51 | 3 |
| Wow. That was interesting. Kinda reminds me of the day I went somewhere
to buy something. It was very interesting.
|
8.317 | | HOO78C::ANDERSON | I'll think about that tomorrow. | Thu Dec 10 1992 01:35 | 3 |
| Yup, it had me on the edge of my chair too.
Jamie.
|
8.318 | | COMET::FARMERA | HISTORICAL AMBIGUITIES | Thu Dec 10 1992 08:23 | 12 |
| Sorry guys, it's just some of the things that were spelled out were
things that i'm not sure I really wanted to know. The house we were in
was in itself interesting, the kind of house that makes you feel
uneasy. If you've ever been in a place that gives you the feeling that
you know something is wrong, or out of place, that's how we all felt.
Whether it was because of what we were going to do there or not I don't
know, but we were really jumpy. Does anyone know if that can effect
what happens when using a Ouija? Well to me, just exploring an old
house, especially at night, is fun and interesting. Sorry I cannot add
more.
Drew
|
8.319 | | HOO78C::ANDERSON | I'll think about that tomorrow. | Thu Dec 10 1992 08:57 | 4 |
| Oh how I wish that I has the ability to explain thing as concisely,
vividly and with such detail as Drew.
Jamie.
|
8.320 | How long til I get crucified for this? | ICS::ODONNELL | It's hard being string all the time | Thu Dec 10 1992 13:24 | 6 |
| Re -1
I would think that in an `enlightened' conference such as this suggests
it is, people wouldn't be so judgemental. I tire of all the negative
energy that gets slung around in this conference so I believe I'll step
out.
|
8.321 | | UHUH::REINKE | Formerly Flaherty | Thu Dec 10 1992 14:32 | 10 |
| << <<< Note 8.320 by ICS::ODONNELL "It's hard being string all the time" >>>
<< -< How long til I get crucified for this? >-
Hope you'll reconsider and stay. Yes, there are always some who will
spout negativities and be downright cruel with their judgements and
namecalling. But it would be a shame if they were allowed to drive
others out, by their lack of understanding and empathy.
Ro
|
8.322 | | REGENT::BROOMHEAD | Don't panic -- yet. | Thu Dec 10 1992 14:57 | 6 |
| If you like, I will crucify you for being so judgemental and negative
yourself.
But I have the decency to stick around and wait for the responses.
Ann B.
|
8.323 | more please | TNPUBS::PAINTER | worlds beyond this | Thu Dec 10 1992 15:28 | 8 |
|
Let's get back to the topic.
Drew, please continue. I'm interested in what you have to say.
The rest of the comments...well, it was a full moon last night...(;^)
Cindy
|
8.324 | | HOO78C::ANDERSON | I'll think about that tomorrow. | Fri Dec 11 1992 01:49 | 6 |
| >Drew, please continue. I'm interested in what you have to say.
Cindy, we would all be interested in what he has to say. So far he has
written two replies in which he stated absolutely nothing.
Jamie.
|
8.325 | Clearing the air. | COMET::FARMERA | HISTORICAL AMBIGUITIES | Sat Jan 30 1993 21:03 | 10 |
| I would like to appologize to all those interested parties for the
in-appropriate responses that I have given. I do not want to talk about
what happened that night but I felt compelled to note something to all
of those who were interested. Unfortunatly I did not do a very good job
at it. At some point I may dictate the night's events but until that
time I again appologize.
Thanks
Drew
|
8.326 | Hell..he's got more guts than I have!!!! | CHEFS::BECKC | | Wed Feb 24 1993 12:23 | 16 |
| Hi
I'm fairly new to notes, and to this conference, I have just spent the
last couple of weeks reading all there is to know about Ouji boards.
I have to say, I take my hat off to Drew, although my interest is
incredibly high, my fear is very close behind and prevents me from
going any further, there is no way, I would have ever put myself into
the position that he did.
I guess it must have been something really horrendous for Drew not to
want to relive it.
ciao
Chrissie
|
8.327 | | ARRODS::OHAGANB | Hail Freedonia! | Fri Feb 26 1993 11:21 | 5 |
| re. 8.142
A ghost in the machine I presume?
barry.
|
8.328 | What does it mean when..... | DKAS::GALLUP | Have faith in you and the things you do! | Mon Nov 29 1993 12:06 | 30 |
|
A friend and I have been asking a Ouija board some questions about an old
house. In the course of our encounters with the Ouija board, we've found
two spirits that "belong" to the house, and they tell us something is hidden
in the house.
One spirit has already led us to a hidden compartment (nothing was in it)
but the spirits say there is another one.
Unfortunately, we don't understand everything the board is telling us. It
makes certain movements that we don't know how to interpret because over
the years the instructions with this board have been lost.
Can anyone answer what the following movements mean:
1. There is a Sun near the YES and a Moon near the NO. To answer
some questions, the planchette moves to the Sun. Sometimes it
cycles from the Sun to the Moon and back. What do these symbols
mean?
2. What does it mean when it cycles back/forth from A-N?
What does it mean when it cycles back/forth from O-Z?
3. Can I assume that if it moves faster and faster (usually
from O-Z) that it's annoyed/angry/etc?
Thanks.
Kath
|
8.329 | Ask them ! | UTROP1::HANSSEN_J | are you serious ? | Thu Dec 02 1993 05:39 | 11 |
| re-1
It's hard to say what the movements mean ; in fact you have to feel
what it means. If you feel anger/agression it can be agression. In all
the times I used the bord there where movements unknown to us. When
there were no other clear messages we found out that we were dealing
with 'forces of disturbance', just there to play with us. If there were
clear messages we asked simply what it meaned. Many times the answer
was trying out or just the kick of communicating with us ( movements to
the sun !).
^0^
|
8.330 | anyone still around? | MKOTS3::WIGHTMAN | | Mon Apr 18 1994 05:49 | 41 |
| Well, I'm really new here, in April 94 no less, but I had an
interesting experience with the Ouija as a kid too. My sister and I
"played" with one a few times and got the normal gobbledy-gook mixed in
with some interesting messages, warnings that came true, etc.
After one particular incident where my sister was warned to beware of a
pan of water two days before my mother swung around from the stove and
sprayed my sister with scalding water we decided to try something a
little different.
We did the night-time bit with the candles and a little twist... a tape
recorder. See, I had read abit about what was possibly happening and
seen a show on tv that had spirit recordings and such so I figured if
it was possible to have images appear on film it might also be possible
to have things appear on tape that were inaudible. During the session
you could hear our voices asking questions and spelling out the answers
like you would expect, but what we didn't expect came from before we
got going.
We started with the basic "is anyone here" (I know, I know, dumb thing
to do), and asked for some sound or sign that there was actually
someone (thing) there. We didn't get anything and went on, contacted a
being and had a normal session. Afterwards we listened to the tape and
in that space after asking for a sound (about thirty seconds) there was
mostly silence until there came a roaring sound. I don't know quite how
to describe it, not like a train or a lion, maybe like a man with a
deep voice. It started low and grew quickly, then faded out again, like
there was a windup and winddown. rrrrRRRROOOOOAAAAAARRRRRRrrrrr.
Nothing else strange on the tape but to this day I can hear that sound
and get the same prickly hair on the neck.
On a similar note, a couple of years ago I took a class on channeling
(it was a requirement) and had another experience with a tape recorder.
I was "channeling" and a partner was asking questions that I had pre-
written. You could hear her ask the questions, you could hear people
all throughout the room, but you couldn't hear ONE answer I gave, even
though she also wrote the answers down. Spooky, eh?
Steve
(not just a new age knucklehead)
|
8.331 | Ouija Boards | MSBCS::GONELLI | | Thu Sep 29 1994 17:22 | 11 |
| Well you just spooked the h*** out of me... I had a very weird
incident with a Ouija board and until this day, I never wanted
to think about it or talk about it. But when I was a little
kid we did the same thing with Ouija boards, just fooling around
type stuff. Until one day the Ouija board was sitting on top of
our piano down stairs and I swear to god that thing that moves
around on the board was moving by itself. I still get chills
thinking about it.. and no I haven't lost my mind...and I
believe your story..
Nancy
|
8.333 | | BOBSBX::RAMSAY | | Mon Mar 04 1996 10:47 | 10 |
| Kath (I believe that's your name from other notes you've written),
happy to have you here exploring everything! Hopefully you've read all
the replies regarding Ouija boards in this note 8. My own personal
experience with Ouija boards is, I tried one a few times years ago but
stopped when a friend whom I respect begged me not to do it any more
because she believed (via her religion) that it was controlled by the
devil or satan also; and after reading everyone's experiences in here,
I have no desire to do so.
*Stella*
|
8.334 | | MKOTS3::STARBRIGHT | | Mon Mar 04 1996 11:04 | 14 |
|
I, personally, do not advocate the use of Ouija boards. I also do not
believe in Satan. But I do believe that when you are using a tool (the
board) you can easily open yousrelf up to lower entities which can
cause you great harm. Usually people tend to treat the board as a toy.
(In my experience anyway) It is not a toy, it is a tool and tools not
handled safely and properly are dangerous.
There are special ways to dispose of ouija boards. I do not think that
tossing them into the trash is a good idea either. I have a friend that
does a cleansing and buring ritual of boards.
Serenity Starbright
|
8.335 | | WMOIS::CONNELL | Story does that to us. | Mon Mar 04 1996 18:42 | 8 |
| I agree 100% with Serenity. Ouija Boards are not to be fooled with. It
would take a very strong will indeed to control what entity comes
through on a Ouija board. One also needs the proper safeguards and
unless you are trained and have a strong will, you're taking chances.
Bright Blessings,
PJ
|
8.336 | | BOOGIE::TAYLOR | | Wed Mar 06 1996 13:08 | 32 |
|
I often wonder why you see them stacked to the ceilings in toys-r-us.
I had one as a kid, and had fun with it , we thought it was a fortune
telling tool, similar to a crystal ball or something !
We would ask questions about the future.
Nothing malicious like demonic posesson or anything ever occured
fortunately. {:') I guess we were protected by the light.
If the board itself is merely a means to communicate with the spirit
world then I wonder why satan and evil seems to be so prevalently
associated with them ? Are these evil entities always around ?
Or perhaps that's exactly what these entities do , which is to prey
on the innocent.
I was given a board as a gift about 5 years ago and have yet to
really use it. I've tried a couple of times by myself without
success.
I have been warned by others to not get involved with it.
I find this pretty interesting due to the fact that most ancient
as well as non-western cultures believe in evil spirits and their
possible influence on our lives.
Perhaps there is some truth to this after all and that this evil
is exactly what they were referring to.
/todd
|
8.337 | | BIS1::BRIGGS | Chicken Tikka Jalfrezzi | Mon Jul 29 1996 09:52 | 16 |
| I have never messed with an Ouija board, my fianc�e has. When I was at
college I was warned by a teacher who recounted a particular tale about
a guy who messed with one of these, turned from an outgoing
personallity into a recluse, and within a few weeks was found hanged in
his room one day.
I'm interested, but it frightens me. And I will never mess with one.
I have been reading a few early replies and .298 onwards and I find all
the information very interesting, however, I do have a couple of
questions
i. What is a Ouija board and is it made out of anything special?
I look forward to any responses.
Denzil
|
8.338 | Strange goings on... | CHEFS::MAYJ | Oh Smeg indeed matey! | Wed Jul 31 1996 15:56 | 36 |
|
Hi again Denzil,
A Ouija Board can be made of anything.
Its just a flat surface with the letters of the alphabet,
numbers 0-9 and YES and NO on it.
Mirrors are favourites with somepeople. They draw the letters and
numbers etc on. Mirrors seem to have a strange connection with the
paranormal.
Waddingtons, the board game manufacturer, actually sold it years ago as
a board game.
My sisters once did one when they were at school, some 15 years ago.
They did it in my Grandmothers house with a few of their friends.
They said it did move all by itself and being in the house by
themselves it really scared them and they all ran out screaming.
So they said.
There was a strange presence in that house though. My Grandmother, who
lived alone, said on a few occasions, that she felt a hand on her
sholder. On turning round, noone was there.
She died a few years ago now. My parents were left the house and were
re-decorating it to sell it. One day they took me and my Girlfriend
down there to see how things were going. We all went upstairs to have
a look around and there was a tin plate being used for the decorating
in some way on a pasting table. We all went into another room and
heard this plate fall on the floor. We all rushed in and it was on the
floor a couple of feet away from the table. We were all sure it wasn't
on the edge of the table before it fell, but maybe it was or maybe...
Anyway, I have been present when some friends from school tried to do a
Ouija board. They had no luck. Or perhaps they 'were' lucky.
John...
|
8.339 | hello?? | ASABET::DENARO | | Wed Jan 22 1997 10:35 | 1 |
8.340 | | BGSDEV::RAMSAY | | Thu Jan 23 1997 10:27 | 1
|