T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
3848.1 | These are Motif 1.2 bindings; look in examples area | KMOOSE::CMCCUTCHEON | Charlie McCutcheon | Tue Feb 25 1997 09:53 | 14 |
| >Xm_Convenience.Traversal.Is_Traversable
>Xm_String.Nmwm_functions_ptr
I just did a quick check, and I find these two just fine in V3.3 for
Digital UNIX in the examples area. These are apparently Motif 1.2
specific. The default in the predefined library is Motif 1.1.
Look for the *x5m12*.ada file names.
I assumed the other symbols are there (I picked unique looking ones
for easy searching), and that the VMS targets also have them.
Let me know if I missed something.
Charlie
|
3848.2 | Default installation? | COMICS::EDWARDSN | Dulce et decorum est pro PDP program | Thu Feb 27 1997 04:13 | 7 |
| Given that Motif 1.1 has been pretty much dead for a while now,
wouldn't it be nice to have the 1.2 bindings loaded by default on
an install?
Thanks for the prompt response, I hadn't thought of that angle.
Neil.
|
3848.3 | | KMOOSE::CMCCUTCHEON | Charlie McCutcheon | Thu Feb 27 1997 10:29 | 8 |
| >Given that Motif 1.1 has been pretty much dead for a while now,
Last I asked, 1.1 isn't dead on VMS 6.1. That's our lowest required
VMS operating system.
It's easy to upgrade to 1.2. (If not, give us feedback! ;-)
Charlie
|
3848.4 | Also... | COMICS::EDWARDSN | Dulce et decorum est pro PDP program | Fri Feb 28 1997 10:53 | 32 |
| For some reason, and it's a while back, so I can't remember installing this
nor do I remember tampering with it...
I just have a look in:
/usr/ccs/lib/cmplrs/ada_320/examples/X11R5_Motif_1.2
and did a diff on
motifbindingx5m12_xm_convenience_.ada
with the X11R4 one.
They would appear to be IDENTICAL!
This is probably an ancient mistake (perhaps on my part) but that's
what led me to believe that there was a problem here. When I looked in
the examples under the Unix box, there were no matches found.
I have a little system management to perform here, since the Unix box
we have is more or less tied up most of the time so upgrading is hard.
But I'll get to 4.0B and install the latest kit and see what happens.
> Last I asked, 1.1 isn't dead on VMS 6.1. That's our lowest required
> VMS operating system.
Didn't it die at the end of Jan? (Or become unsupported?)
bye for now,
Neil.
|
3848.5 | | KMOOSE::CMCCUTCHEON | Charlie McCutcheon | Fri Feb 28 1997 10:57 | 18 |
| >/usr/ccs/lib/cmplrs/ada_320/examples/X11R5_Motif_1.2
>...
>with the X11R4 one.
>...
>They would appear to be IDENTICAL!
Yes, this is a bug caught during the V3.3 field test. For V3.3, these
bindings should now be different.
>> Last I asked, 1.1 isn't dead on VMS 6.1. That's our lowest required
>> VMS operating system.
>
>Didn't it die at the end of Jan? (Or become unsupported?)
It's possible, but I haven't heard. No one's requested Motif 1.2 to be
the default (except you!).
Charlie
|