[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference 7.286::sports_90

Title:OURGNG::SPORTS - Digital's daily tabloid
Notice:Please review note 1.83 before writing anything.
Moderator:VAXWRK::NEEDLE
Created:Thu Dec 14 1989
Last Modified:Fri Dec 17 1993
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:438
Total number of notes:50420

353.0. "Kids and Sports" by CNTROL::CHILDS (Bubby's just another Momma's boy\) Mon Sep 10 1990 11:40

	 Reprinted without permission from usa today because it's interesting
         and not everybody gets the paper but everybody should read this..
         ************( and I need the typing preactice)*****************

	Twenty million U.S. kids from preschooler to teens are climbing into
 uniforms this fall, folowing coaches'orders, sweating to win. Is all this
 organized or supervised activity good?

	A USAtoday/NBC poll of 645 families' attitudes shows that they see
 benefits: It's a fun, and it teaches confidence and fitness. But the poll
 also shows that parents and their children are not blind to the shortcomings:
 Sleepless nights, tales of poor sportsmanship and injuries attest to that.

	The poll was conducted by the Gordon S. Black corp has a 4% margin
 of error.

 > the effect of pressure on the kids:
 	
	More than 4 out 10 kids say they have awaken in the middle of the
   night worring about an upcoming event. "you want to go to sleep, but you
   stay awake thinking about everything," says Jon Dewar 11 of Baltimore. Of
   tournement games "they get you so hyper, you get overtired and you stay up.
   Most of the time I watch TV and fall asleep around 1:00 o'clock."

	One in three kids say they've played sick or hurt because they thought
   they had to. "She hates to let the team down. She's got that kind of drive,"
   says Keith Little of Wichita Kan. of his daughter Angie, who has pitched 
   with a sore arm.

	*****37% would rather not have parents watch them play.***
   "they get too hyper," Dewar says of parents. "You want them to say good
    stuff, then the pressure is on. People watching makes you nervous."

    "I'd be so embaressed if I messed up," says Micahel Estrada 15 of El Paso.

 > Parents and kids see poor sportsmanship particularly in their peer groups:

	51% of the kids see other kids act as poor sports frequently; only 27%
   see it happen with parents.

        52% of parents see it in other parents only 22% see it in kids often.

 	The pressure in organized sports prompts many kids to prefer pickup
  games. "You just go out to have fun and play," says Marcus Griffin of Selma.
  "The coaches put emphasis on winning and loosing...You go out to win in 
  organized sports in street games it doesn't matter wether you win or loose."

	"It's too much pressure," says Nicole Gerard 17, of Grand Rapids. "Too
  much is expected of you, I think." Nicole says she has "come close" to 
  dropping out of softball. About 75% of kids are out of organized sports by
  the time they're 15. Experts say it's because parents and coaches apply 
  their values not the kids.  It takes away all the fun.

	" how many times do you hear a professional athlete say he's quitting
  because it isn't fun anymore? Why should it be different for a 7, 8 or 9
  year old says Mike Pfahl executive director of the National Youth Sports
  Coaches' Association.

 > The poll debunks several popular theories crtical of youth sports:

	Kids play sports because their parents want them to.
   Only one of 73 kids (1.4%) say parents wishes are the main reason they
   play; 93% say they play because they want too, 4% because friends do.
	"I like to play organized sports because I don't have to play with
   people who do not know how to play the game," says Justin Edmonsdson 13
   of Hollbrook. and he adds no kids are cheating cause they don't know the
   rules "it makes it easier".

 > Kids don't play sports on their own:

   Actually their just as likely to play sports on their own as in a structured
   setting: 50% play organized sports atleast twice a week: 48% play pick up
   games in the neighborhood with the same frequency.
   "There's a lot of people around where I live and there's usually nothing to
    do, so we go down to the school and play on our own" say Dewar.
    But not all kids have the same opportunity" There just aren't as many open
    fields or empty lots around anymore. And "in some cases playgrounds are 
    unsafe," says Vern Seefeldt director of youth sports at Michigan St. U.

 > Kids believe natural ability, not hard work is the key to success in sports:

	Three out of four believe that success is the results of hard work.
   (Black parents feel especially strong: 67% attributed success to hard work,
    compare with 45% of white parents who responded). "Like my father says,
   you can't be a star by just hopping out of bed. You have to train for
   it, Edmondson said.

 > Organized sports are making kids too competitive:

     Most kids don't care about keeping score: 71% said it would make any
  difference if no one kept score: 12% said they enjoy it less and 17%
  said they enjoy it more. "If you play good that's all that counts," says
  Dewar, a soccer goalie who hears teammated yell at him when the opponents
  score. "You can't pay attention to them. If they were in goal they'd
  screw up just like you."

  " I just like going against other girls," say Keisha Simpson 13 of Cinncy.

> Soccer is the up and coming sport in the USA:

	Soccer is heavily played 45% (third on list) but it's not the most
  popular. 7% of the kids list it as their favorite sport to play with 
  friends when no adults are involved. The honor of favorite to play goes
  to basketball at 26%.

 > Parents see their kids as couch potatoes:
   
	62% say their children are more involved in sports than they were,
  and 86% say their kids are more fit or equal as fit as they were at the 
  same age.

	These perceptions are not suppported by studies on youth fitness.
  The President's council on Physical Fitness and Sports, which has been
  testing kids since 1958, and the Chrysler Fund Amatuer Athletic Union
  on Physical Fitness program which has tested for 10 years say youth
  fitness is not improving and in some cases is declining.

	The consenus: While our sports programs produce some superbly
  conditioned youths many more are unfit. A new school of thought says
  sports and fitness are not necessarily the same thing, that more time
  should be spent educating children about fitness than sports.

	But despite the overzealousness of coaches and parents and the 
  hidden pressures it creates, kids give a resounding thumbs up to
  organized sports. The majority feel sports "help a lot" in boosting
  self confidence (76%) and keeping them out of trouble (63%). More than
  that 88% say sports help a lot just for having plain fun.


 
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
353.1Great articalBSS::BAUDSHOPOh Well, Try Again Next YearMon Sep 10 1990 14:0311
    That was a great artical, thanks for sharing it. The one thing I would
    like to see addressed in youth sports is the competence of the people
    who are coaching the players on the feild. There are so many people
    who know the game but know nothing or at least very little about proper
    conditioning of these kids. I feel there should be some kind of 
    ceritification for those individuals who coach kids in sports. Does
    anyone know of such a requirement? I know there are required
    ceritifications for jr high coaches and high school coaches but what
    about the park and rec type of coaches?
    Thanks again for sharing the artical.
    
353.2Foot halfway implanted in cheek :-)AKOV06::DCARRJust call me Carr-nacMon Sep 10 1990 14:5811
    I read the article in the paper, and the one thing I couldn't believe
    is that 71% didn't care if they kept score or not!   What are we
    raising here, a bunch of tofu-eating wimps with no competitive drive? 
    No wonder we lose in Little League to the Orientals...
    
    Geez, fantasy sports future doesn't look too good in THESE kids hands,
    eh?
    
    ML
    
    (My apologies to those that eat tofu, like it, and aren't wimps :-)
353.3Good article Mikey. Author needs a dictionary though. :-) SASE::SZABOTue Sep 11 1990 11:1214
    Re: certification, etc.
    
    It's hard enough to recruit parents for coaching Little League
    Baseball, Youth Soccer, and other sports and activities for the younger
    kids, but if you force certification programs on these people, these
    sports would not survive.  I also feel that the less formal you keep
    these things, the more fun the kids will likely have.
    
    Being a parent who coaches and/or assists at every sport both my kids
    get involved in, I would not be able to afford the time and money to
    attend formal certification training for everything.  Bottom line- the
    kids wouldn't benefit at all, I think.
    
    Hawk
353.4exSASE::SZABOTue Sep 11 1990 12:5039
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
	Well, someone pointed out to me through mail the advantages of 
        certification of youth sports coaches and I must admit that I
        agree.  Here's what he said........
     
    
<Header removed to preserve anonymity of sender>
    
Subj:	Respectfully disagree
    
Hi John,

		Have to disagree with you on this.   Parents who want
to coach should go through certification programs.  The point of the
programs is to teach the parent/coach that these are KIDS that you are
dealing with.  These programs do not take very long(mine were 4hrs hours
apiece) so time is not really an issue plus they do not cost very much, and 
most leagues will reimburse you for all/part of the cost.

		Having a coach/parent go through certification will hopefully
help get rid of the bad coaches.

Later
Leo Lapointe  IDAHO::LAPOINTE  ACO/P59  dtn:232-2562  Big Bruins fan

PS. I do agree that it is hard to get parents involved. :-)
353.5QUASER::JOHNSTONLegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.!Tue Sep 11 1990 13:245
�    (My apologies to those that eat tofu, like it, and aren't wimps :-)

              That'd be like apologizing to air (nobody there)

   Mike JN
353.6Coaching certificationBTOVT::TATRO_BTue Sep 11 1990 13:2624
    re .1  coaching certfication:
    
    It's required in our town that anyone who coaches anything
    ( any sport, any age until high school ) be certified by the
    National Youth Sports Coaches Assosciation that Mike mentioned
    in the article in the base note. Certification is a result of 
    watching a series of videos on the psychology of kids, on conditioning,
    first-aid and specific coaching tips on the sport the coach is
    involved with. Videos are followed by discussions and a written exam. 
    The benefit of the program is twofold; this professional training
    through the videos teaches a great deal and succesful completion 
    of the exam certifies the coach and automatically entitles him/her
    to $500,000 in liability and if every team in whatever league he's
    in ( Little League, soccer, etc. ) has at least one certified coach
    than the league is covered for $1,000,000 in liability insurance.
    I would highly recommend the program to all of you as it helps good
    coaches get better and helps those coaches who coach out of ego or
    only to win get a different perspective on sports. I've got the
    NYSCA address; if any of you are interested, send me a note.
    
    Bart   
    
    
      
353.7FSHQA2::AWASKOMWed Sep 12 1990 08:0317
    I know that I've always appreciated coaches that had at least some
    first aid training, and a minimal certification sounds like a good
    idea.  
    
    I also know that last winter, we had one soccer team (indoor,
    U-19's - high school seniors and juniors) that basically didn't *have*
    an adult coach.  Whatever parent was there that night got asked to
    stand in the box and look 'official' to fulfill the 'you must have an
    adult coach' requirement.  The kids wanted to play that badly, and
    because of internal politics, had been specifically included *out* of
    any officially coached team.  Sometimes ya gotta roll with the punches.
    
    
    Has anyone got yesterday's USA Today?  I'm interested in the whole
    week's series, and didn't get a copy of that issue.  
    
    A&W
353.8SASE::SZABOWed Sep 12 1990 09:2012
    I believe it was NBC that aired a special last night to coincide with
    the USA Today series on this topic.  Unfortunately, because of the
    programming delay from the President's speech (or whatever he did), the
    time it aired got pushed way out and I just couldn't watch much of it.
    
    One thing I'm really curious about.  Why did they say that tackle
    football turned out much safer than other sports such as soccer, for
    instance?  Just when they went into explaining it, I got interrupted.
    
    Interesting stuff.....
    
    Hawk
353.9haCOBRA::DINSMORERodney Hampton...ROYWed Sep 12 1990 09:477
    hawks,
    
    ya got interrupted?  ha.. was the woodie acting up?
    
    
    dinz
    
353.10leave it tO the dinz!SASE::SZABOWed Sep 12 1990 10:007
    
    dinz, the hanDle was only shellaced halfWay up so i Decided to fInish
    the job........
    
    send me mail :-)
    
    haWk
353.11CAM::WAYBatman plays rugby...Robin plays softballWed Sep 12 1990 10:1117
Send me femail ;^)

I didn't see TV lasted night.  This is just a guess, but I'd bet that
tackle football is safer than the other sports for a few reasons.

First, I've seen young kids play, and the pace of the game is fairly
slow.  Probably the most prevalent injury in football is knees, and logically
one could postulate that the incidents of knee injuries goes up with
the pace of the game, so that you start seeing them first in high school.

Second, because the game is a contact game, people are much more aware
of the safety aspect, and pay special attention to equipment and 
conditioning.

That'd be my best guess....

'Saw
353.12only saw a little bit...CSTEAM::FARLEYHave YOU seen Elvis today??Wed Sep 12 1990 11:1215
    By the time I got home from class last night, it was almost 11:00PM
    (yawn!) and the show had just begun (i guess) to cover the injury
    issue.
    
    Fottsaball was rated as safer than most FOR THOSE WHO HAVEN'T HIT
    PUBERTY.  The kiddies are lightweight and cain't hit,tackle, etc.
    with much force.  When they get to HS, the injury dastistics(tm)
    go thru the roof. (oh yeah, the pads, helmets etc. w/the little
    ones also help.)
    
    HTH,
    
    maybe more later,
    Kev
    
353.13CAM::WAYBatman plays rugby...Robin plays softballWed Sep 12 1990 12:5619
Agreed Kev --

During our warmup run last night at practice we circled by a
football field in Colt Park several times.  There was a midget football
game going on.  

The pace of the game was so SLOW.  It was almost like watching pro
football in slow motion.  The QB took the snap, and made the handoff.
The DL breaking through was coming so slow I almost could have
yelled out to the other back in the backfield to block him, and
whammo (again in slo-mo) the DL hit the RB for a three yard loss.

In that time I must have covered 20-30 yards, and I'm just a slow
old guy....;^)

Once these kids hit puberty, the pace picks up, muscle mass increases,
and the injuries start....

'Saw
353.14Mixed messages - evidence rampant in this notesfileAUSTIN::MACNEALBo don&#039;t know rugby!Tue Sep 25 1990 15:248
    It was interesting reading some of the comments in here after reading
    the "if you can't win it all, don't bother" arguments in the Red Sox
    notes.  What kind of message are we sending kids when at one point we
    get on Little League coaches/parents for pushing kids too hard and then
    start yelling at the hometown team on the tube for failing to win the
    big one.  The Pros are expected to act professionally, yet get blasted
    when they start treating the game as the job it really is, or when they
    don't seem to be taking it seriously enough.
353.15Hypocrisy runs rampant, but don't expect anybody to confess.RHETT::KNORRI&#039;m off to see Dean!Tue Sep 25 1990 15:5013
    re: -1
    
    Excellent comments.  What more proof do you need than having Dean Smith
    be labeled "overrated" when his academic record is almost unmatched and
    his integrity beyond question.
    
    (These same people who moan about how overrated Dean is will be quick
    to point out what a joke academics is for college jocks though.)
    
    :^(
    
    
    - ACC Chris
353.16Excellent point, MacBUILD::MORGANBogg Watch: 19 to goTue Sep 25 1990 16:191
    
353.17Different messages - not mixed (IMO)AKOV06::DCARRToo bad we cant vote the DEC ins outWed Sep 26 1990 12:3641
    Mac, tho' I know whatcha mean, I don't agree with all of your points.
    
>    It was interesting reading some of the comments in here after reading
>    the "if you can't win it all, don't bother" arguments in the Red Sox
>    notes. What kind of message are we sending kids when at one point we
>    get on Little League coaches/parents for pushing kids too hard and then
>    start yelling at the hometown team on the tube for failing to win the
>    big one.  
    
    I don't think parents are sending conflicting messages at all here:
    
    The kids are supposed to be playing a "game", and the pros are supposed 
    to be "working".  Parents should push kids to excel at THEIR job (i.e. 
    get A's in school), but shouldn't put the same emphasis on sport.  
    Clearly, parents put too much emphasis on winning in Little League.
    
>    The Pros are expected to act professionally, yet get blasted
>    when they start treating the game as the job it really is, or when they
>    don't seem to be taking it seriously enough.

    If I'm not mistaken, nobody in REDSOX was blasting the PLAYERS at all.
    My beef (and, I believe, the others that agreed with me) was that the
    ORGANIZATION (i.e. owners, front office, management) does not appear to
    be willing to "sacrifice the future to win it all now"...  In fact, Lou
    Gorman admits as much every time he explains why he didn't make his
    latest trade:
    
    "Wellitshardtomakeatradewithonly10daysleftintheseasonandbesideswetried
    tomakeatrade,severaltradesinfact,buteverybodywasaskingtoomuchfortheir
    playerandI'mnotwillingtosacrificeourfutureforhelpnow,especiallyifthat
    playerisafreeagentandmaynotbearoundnextyear."
    
    It's this type of attitude by management (just be competitive, draw 2.5
    million, don't pay any free agents too much, and we can all make money,
    get a tan and have a nice summer playing outside :-) that we (I) am
    blasting...   I want the Sox to be like the A's (or even the Blue
    Jays) and trade every freakin' farmhand they got! if it will bring us a
    world championship!!!
    
    ML
    
353.18FSHQA2::AWASKOMWed Sep 26 1990 13:2119
    At some point, probably during high school, maybe during college, an
    individual decides on his/her career objectives.  For some, the
    objective becomes being a player in professional sports.  (In fact,
    there may be multiple points where this decision is remade.)  Prior to that
    decision point, parents should encourage their children to treat sports
    as something done 'for fun'.  After that point, the individual athlete
    starts to focus his attention at becoming the best that he can be. 
    That's the point where winning becomes the object.  I would argue that
    for both high school and college sports, you have a mix of athlete
    'types', and the games should be regarded in that light by the fans. 
    The athletes themselves know and recognize which camp they fall into. 
    Their expectations and mind-set and the amount of work they put into
    their sport(s) reflects that.  (Sometimes this drives the serious
    athlete crazy, when their primary team consists of non-pro focused
    teammates.)  I would feel that my role as a parent at that point is to
    ensure that my child had a 'fall-back' objective that they were
    prepared for if the high-risk athletic career didn't pan out.
    
    A&W
353.19CAM::WAYHappiness is a loose ruckThu Sep 27 1990 13:5913
I saw this on the back of a rugby t-shirt, and in my idealistic
naivet�, it represents the essence of sports (any sport including
that manliest of manly sports from whence it came) and what I will
ultimately teach to my children on day.....



	To win the game is great.
	To play the game is greater.
	To love the game is greatest.


I couldn't say it any better....
353.20SASE::SZABOThu Sep 27 1990 14:276
    That is great, 'Saw!  Perhaps some technoweenie could somehow enlarge
    it so it doesn't look so lost on an 8x10 piece of paper?  I'd like to
    take it home to hang on the fridge so my kids'll see it everyday when
    they hang-up their day's schoolwork......
    
    Hawk
353.21MCIS1::DHAMELThumb screws; The rack; Red SoxThu Sep 27 1990 15:088
    
                   "Did you enjoy the game, my son?
                    Quite a lot, I'll bet.
                    No matter that you lost or won;
                    Tis all in how you sweat."
    
    Henry Gibson Dickster
    
353.22CSC32::J_HERNANDEZJump back!!! What&#039;s that sound?Thu Sep 27 1990 15:424
    It ain't whether you win or lose...
    
    
    Until you lose!!!
353.23AXIS::ROBICHAUDDockers... Pants for |CENSORED|sFri Sep 28 1990 06:515
�                    Tis all in how you sweat."

	Nice Dick, real nice telling kids to take drugs.

				/8^)
353.24CAM::WAYHappiness is a loose ruckFri Sep 28 1990 08:436
I dare say a man learns more of his measure in a losing effort than
in a winning effort.  Everyone loves to win, but it takes more strength
to lose a game, stand and cheer your victorious opponent, and then shake
his hand.

'Saw
353.25:-)SASE::SZABOFri Sep 28 1990 08:476
    > ....it takes more strength to lose a game, stand and cheer your
    > victorious opponent, and then shake his hand.
    
    ....without slapping him upside his haid.....
    
    Hawk