T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
197.1 | An interesting approach ... | SHALOT::HUNT | A single ping please, Vasily. | Wed Mar 28 1990 10:55 | 11 |
|
� Differential y, Differential x,
� To hell with differentials, we want SEX! ;-)
Nice cheer but usually a candlelight dinner, some soft music, and
dimming the lights is a more successful approach.
Let me know, though, if you Techsters have had some luck with
this approach. Hey, I can deal with it if it works.
Bob Hunt
|
197.2 | Yeah, down at the water treatment plant! :^) | GENRAL::WADE | Is it the shoes! | Wed Mar 28 1990 10:56 | 1 |
|
|
197.3 | maybe we should run em outa town | FTMUDG::REED | OklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling Championship | Wed Mar 28 1990 10:58 | 11 |
| > Anyone know where Ga Tech fans are congregating in Colorado Springs on Saturday?
> Differential y, Differential x,
> To hell with differentials, we want SEX! ;-)
I haven't seen any unusually strange-looking characters around lately.
And it's still too early for tourists. How can you identify these critters?
Do Georgians travel by haywagon or by stockcar? 8^D
Cowboy
|
197.4 | Having fun, guys? | AZTECH::RYER | | Wed Mar 28 1990 11:24 | 15 |
| Awright, awright, enough already. 8^)
When I was at Tech (late 60's), there were approximately 8,000 students. Only
100-200 were female. So, when the cheer originated, there were lots and lots
of horny Tech students. It was meant only as a signal to true Tech fans
(i.e., if you ain't been to Tech, it don't mean nothing to ya). By the way,
is this what you guys do for a living, read the sports notes file? I know
it's in Riggen's job description. Come on, Jeff, get your two cents in quick.
Here's another one for you:
Tangent, secant, cosine, sine,
Three point one four one five nine,
Convergent series, Poisson's Brackets,
Dis-integrate them, Yellow Jackets.
|
197.5 | | PNO::HEISER | hanging 10 with E.T. | Wed Mar 28 1990 11:33 | 1 |
| Do Techsters travel on Dawgs?
|
197.6 | | LEVERS::STROUT | Bo knows Fahrvergn�gen's! | Wed Mar 28 1990 11:38 | 8 |
| >Tangent, secant, cosine, sine,
>Three point one four one five nine,
>Convergent series, Poisson's Brackets,
>Dis-integrate them, Yellow Jackets.
Geeks! 8^)
sean
|
197.7 | | AZTECH::RYER | | Wed Mar 28 1990 11:48 | 9 |
| re: .5
Some do, put I prefer transportation that isn't quite so ugly. :-)
re: .6
Yup, no argument here.
Pat
|
197.8 | 8^D | FTMUDG::REED | OklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling Championship | Wed Mar 28 1990 16:40 | 16 |
|
> When I was at Tech (late 60's), there were approximately 8,000 students. Only
> 100-200 were female.
Question: What do you call an 18 boy that enrolls in a school who's
students purchase more slide rules than condoms?
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* *
* S U P E R T E C H N O W E E N I E *
* *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
|
197.9 | Don't know much 'bout diffrentials, but sheeeyit... | CAM::WAY | Be excellent to each other | Thu Mar 29 1990 06:53 | 14 |
| And what's wrong with Stock Cars...
There as much a part of Americana as Motherhood, Apple Pie, Baseball,
Crack in the Streets, George Bush's dislike of Broccoli and drinking
whisky.
My dad used to race modifieds a long time ago, and to me, there's
nothin' like a Friday night at the track, with a few beers, some
brutal bumping going on the in the corners, and some bodacious
ta-tas to watch in between races.
Go Geoff Bodine!
Chainsaw
|
197.10 | | LUNER::BROOKS | No, idiot ! Not Bush ...BROOKS ! | Thu Mar 29 1990 07:58 | 7 |
| re .4
Uh, we had a very simular chant at Rice .... r u sure that it's
(tm) ??? :-)
Not to mention our spelling out William Marsh Rice Institue Of Science
and Technology .....
|
197.11 | | COMET::JOHNSTON | Your suffering will be legendary!! | Thu Mar 29 1990 08:47 | 11 |
|
� Not to mention our spelling out William Marsh Rice Institue Of Science
� and Technology .....
Docker George P. Manyzeros
I love it! That would drive people nuts! By the time you got to the
`Y' people would be sleeping, puking, leaving, fighting..... then you start all
over again, Right? GIMME A DUBBAYA!
MIKE JN
|
197.12 | More Rice cheers | FTMUDG::DUGGAN | | Thu Mar 29 1990 09:44 | 17 |
| I thought the favorite Rice cheer (as explained to me by a Rice
alumnus), was
"Our band's better than your band!"
Another that he said was quite popular, usually started late in the
fourth quarter, was
"We Scored!" (sometimes "We Scored Last!")
or
"There goes the shutout!"
8*)
...mike
|
197.13 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | No, idiot ! Not Bush ...BROOKS ! | Thu Mar 29 1990 11:06 | 13 |
| re .12
NAh .... our favorites at the end was :
"We won the toss !" or "Our players graduate !"
And after a Rice turnover (which happened pretty often), there was,
"Awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww S--T !!!! GOD__MM !!! F--K !! SonOfAB--CH !!!
(Abashed) Gee Wally .... Hi Mom !"
dem was the days ....
|
197.14 | | FTMUDG::DUGGAN | | Thu Mar 29 1990 11:07 | 6 |
| re .13: HARRR!
I forgot those...
...mike
|
197.15 | | REFINE::ASHE | So many nights, I sit by my window | Thu Mar 29 1990 11:57 | 25 |
| >Tangent, secant, cosine, sine,
>Three point one four one five nine,
>Convergent series, Poisson's Brackets,
>Dis-integrate them, Yellow Jackets.
x x
Sounds like shades of the e dy/dx e dx cheer from RPI,
only ours ended
log root cube root log of pi
Disintegrate them RPI...
We spelled out Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute too...
Then the band came up with wonderful cheers like
"We're not nasty, we're not mean...
We're gonna root for the other team...
Go (insert your own expletive deleteds here) go"
Or the new one...
"We eat oat bran, we keep fit,
not like the other team, they eat sh....readed wheat..."
-Walt
|
197.16 | | LEVERS::STROUT | Is that Wilt DISGUISED as Jordan?? | Thu Mar 29 1990 12:00 | 7 |
| > "We eat oat bran, we keep fit,
> not like the other team, they eat sh....readed wheat..."
HAHAHHAHAH!!!! destined to be a classic. Sounds like the stuff
we chant at Rochester Institute of Technology games 8^)
sean
|
197.17 | | GENRAL::WADE | Is it the shoes! | Thu Mar 29 1990 12:09 | 4 |
| I went to a fairly rough high school. One of the favorite cheers
of the time was: "Shut up! You're ugly!".
Claybone
|
197.19 | | UPWARD::HEISER | Red Sea Beach Club | Thu Mar 29 1990 13:07 | 5 |
| When at St. Johns (S), we had a field day with some of the opponents
like "Lemonsta", "Shoesbury", and "Woosta".
Everyone on our side would be rollin' just copying "Lemonsta's" cheers,
complete with accents! ;-)
|
197.20 | Watch it MikeH | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers...Pants for |CENSORED|s | Thu Mar 29 1990 13:47 | 1 |
|
|
197.21 | | UPWARD::HEISER | Red Sea Beach Club | Thu Mar 29 1990 15:06 | 1 |
| sorry Slasha, forgot you live in Lemonsta
|
197.22 | another cheer | DEMING::MCKAY | | Thu Mar 29 1990 16:20 | 10 |
| This was a funny one from a comedian whose inner city cheerleaders
were the toughest.
we don't give a damn about the scoreboard
we are still the balls
while y'all won the ballgame
we stripped your cars!!!
Jimbo
|
197.23 | | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | The Dirtiest player in the game!! | Fri Mar 30 1990 10:14 | 5 |
| When I was in high school we were killing some school like 42-0 in
football when their cheerleaders started going "We got spirit, yes we
do, we got spirit how 'bout you." Then our cheerleaders yelled "So What
we're kicking your *ss!" I was roooolliinnngg. I guess they had been
waiting all week to try that one out.
|
197.25 | | COMET::JOHNSTON | Biggus Dikkus...Wewease Wodewick! | Fri Mar 30 1990 16:00 | 6 |
| The gagnouncers will probably open up by telling us all about
`That Sinderfella team, that Lethal Weapon 3 that all America has clutched to
it's bosoms (or ta tas [ or hooters ] as the case may be). The upstart
underdogs (or underbitches, as the case may be) that we're all rooting for.
Mike JN
|
197.26 | | WOODS::KINGR | FUR...the look that KILLS... | Fri Mar 30 1990 20:35 | 10 |
| Last August my brother-in-law (who lives in Atlanta and works for
Grace) gave a sweatshirt to my son (Jesse age 2).. FROM Georgia Tech!!!
You can bet your sweet buns that when they win it all he will be
wearing it for everyone to see!!!
Proud Daddy..
ANd have a nice day!!
|
197.27 | Congratulations to Georgia Tech for a great season. | RHETT::KNORR | VMS Workstations Support | Mon Apr 02 1990 13:26 | 44 |
| > What approach is that, Bob Hunt?
> Same one like where they paid the ref to rob a_already won game
> from its rightful victors, the Michigan State Spartans?
Leave it to MrT to suggest that a bad call by the refs was the result
of a pay-off. Give us a break, will ya? And you wonder why your
credibility is lower than a snakes belly around these parts ...
Credit Jud & Smith from Michigan State with having the class to not blame
the refs for the loss. Credit MrT with ridiculous accusations and
classless sour grapes.
> Final Four trivia:
> - Has any other totally undeserving team ever appeared in the Final Four?
Tech played some great ball to get to the Final 4. They were as deserving
as anybody. If you want to look for injustices, try on the fact that they
were seeded fourth in (arguably) the toughest region and forced to play in
the backyard of their first opponent, despite being ranked in the Top 10,
winning the ACC Tournament, and being undefeated outside the ACC. All in
all, I'd say they were a pretty deserving finalist. The fact that Michigan
State didn't get the call at the end of the game was a tough break, but don't
lose sight of the fact that a) The Big 10's best and #1 seed couldn't put
away the ACC's 2nd or 3rd best and #4 seed (hah!) in regulation; b) M-State
coulda taken matters into their own hands by having their best player make a
free throw; and c) M-State still could've won the game in overtime.
> - Will the NCAA, in a sudden jag of concern ver its credibility, force
> the Yellowhackers to sew a_asterisk to each uniform?
No, nor should they. The Jackets should be proud of their season and the
only people clammering for an asterisk are the classless Big10 Bigots.
> Hmmm, probably "no" to either. But, come to think of it it's high
> time that the NCAA got a little pro boxing in its veins and Ga. Tech
> is perfect for playing the part of Mike Tate in this drama...
100% ridiculous and absurd.
- ACC Chris
|
197.28 | | OURGNG::J_WARDLE | Better get a T-O Baby!!! | Mon Apr 02 1990 14:14 | 11 |
| Hey ACC_Chris....
Mr. T is just sore cuz there was a bad call against the only BigTen
team that had a shot at winning the tourny that Mr. T himself claims he
could care less about. Of course, he wasn't whining last year when
Michigan got that lame foul call on Rumeal that gave them the
Champeenship.
Translation...Mr. T is a first class hypocrite.
JoJ
|
197.29 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Mon Apr 02 1990 14:21 | 17 |
|
MSU did take the matters into their own hands by putting just enough
pressure on Tech so they couldn't get off a shot before the buzzer, yet
not committing a foul. It worked perfectly except for the fact that
Anderson was permitted to shoot very obviously after the buzzer. Then
one clown tried to give them the game right there by calling it a
3-pointer. That too, was not a close call. He was obviously over the
line. Right then I gave MSU no chance in OT. If they were going to rob
MSU that badly in regulation, there is no way they were going to be
allowed to win in OT.
Free throws are not a given. That's why they shoot them instead of just
chalking up a point. The fact remains that MSU stopped Tech from
scoring and won the game only to get screwed.
HOOT
|
197.30 | | RHETT::KNORR | VMS Workstations Support | Mon Apr 02 1990 14:55 | 31 |
|
> MSU did take the matters into their own hands by putting just enough
> pressure on Tech so they couldn't get off a shot before the buzzer, yet
> not committing a foul.
Sounds to me like a nice way of saying their star chocked at the free
throw line.
> It worked perfectly except for the fact that ...
Yup, worked to perfection. That's why Michigan State got to go home
after the game and Tech went on to the Final 4.
> Right then I gave MSU no chance in OT. If they were going to rob
> MSU that badly in regulation, there is no way they were going to be
> allowed to win in OT.
What a load this line is. No way "they" were going to let [let them
win]. Gimme a break Hoot, you can't believe this. The only possible
defense you can give is that the refs made blattant pro-Tech calls in
the OT, which they didn't.
> Free throws are not a given. That's why they shoot them instead of just
> chalking up a point. The fact remains that MSU stopped Tech from
> scoring and won the game only to get screwed.
No, that's a fack. The FACT is that Tech won the game and went to the
Final 4, while the Big 10 champs didn't even make the Final 8.
- ACC Chris
|
197.31 | | HEFTY::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Tue Apr 03 1990 09:30 | 28 |
|
re: Hoot
Hoot, are you going to tell me that you were watching Anderson's
feet when he took that shot? If you say yes, then you were the
only 3 (2 of the 3 officials) who were watching that. And if you
were watching his feet, how do you know the shot was late? You
know, that is one of the reasons they have 3 officials...so they
can help each other and cover the court properly!
What few people realize is that the trail(ref) is responsible for
calling a shot good at the end of the game. The lead and the other
off official will help if it is close. Usually they will focus
on the 3 pt line and give the trail as much help as the needs.
The call was made correctly whether you want to believe it or not.
The trail was told by the other two officials that the shot
was only a 2 pointer and that was an amazing call given that it
took slow motion and a couple of camera angles to show that anderson's
foot was indeed touching the line.
State's problem was that they missed the 1 and 1 that would
of put the game away, plus they let Anderson dribble 60 feet without
making him give up the ball. Don't blame the ref's for a call that
MSU could of avoided by hitting their foul shots and preventing
a guy from getting a shot off with time running out.
goose
|
197.32 | | ODIXIE::HARPER | This name intentionally left blank. | Thu Apr 05 1990 10:27 | 17 |
| > MSU did take the matters into their own hands by putting just enough
> pressure on Tech so they couldn't get off a shot before the buzzer, yet
> not committing a foul. It worked perfectly except for the fact that
> Anderson was permitted to shoot very obviously after the buzzer. Then
> one clown tried to give them the game right there by calling it a
> 3-pointer. That too, was not a close call. He was obviously over the
> line. Right then I gave MSU no chance in OT. If they were going to rob
> MSU that badly in regulation, there is no way they were going to be
> allowed to win in OT.
> Free throws are not a given. That's why they shoot them instead of just
> chalking up a point. The fact remains that MSU stopped Tech from
> scoring and won the game only to get screwed.
>
Boo hoo hoo! Wah! Wah! Wah!, gurgle sniff sigh!
|
197.33 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Thu Apr 05 1990 17:19 | 3 |
|
Now there is one intelligent individual. Wonder why "Dueling Banjos"
just popped into my head?
|
197.34 | I dunno, Hoot. Didja lose all your teef ??? | SHALOT::HUNT | A single ping please, Vasily. | Thu Apr 05 1990 17:28 | 8 |
| � Now there is one intelligent individual. Wonder why "Dueling Banjos"
� just popped into my head?
Rollward, Hoot ...
Squeal, piggie, squeal ...
Bob Hunt
|