T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
143.1 | All Plan B Team, a try | JUPITR::MOK | Charles P. Mok | Sat Feb 03 1990 14:13 | 33 |
| My All-Plan B Team:
QB Tommy Kramer (Minn.), Doug Williams (Wash.), Doug Flutie (N.E.)
C Mike Webster (K.C.), Doug Smith (Rams)
G Joe Devlin (Buff.), Jeff Bregel (S.F.), Max Montoya (Cin.)
T Damien Johnson (Giant), Newt Harrell (Raiders)
TE Ozzie Newsome (Cleve.), Brent Jones (S.F.)
RB Curt Warner (Sea.), Ottis Anderson (Giants), Joe Morris (Giants),
Sammy Winder (Den.), Ronnie Harman (Buff.)
WR Wesley Walker (Jets), Mike Wilson (S.F.), Greg Garrity (Phil.),
Ron Brown (Rams), Dennis McKinnon (Chi.), James Lofton (Buff.)
NT Jim Burt (S.F.), Fred Smerlas (Buff.)
DT Shawn Miller (Rams), Mark Messner (Rams)
DE Art Stills (Buff.), Ed Jones (Dal.)
LB Reggie Willians (Cin.), Keena Turner (S.F.), Al Harris (Phil.),
Eddie Jonhson (Cleve.)
S Todd Bell (Phil.)
DB Hanford Dixon (Cleve.), Devon Cherry (K.C.), Leroy Irvin (Rams),
Raymond Clayborn (N.E.), Eric Wright (S.F.)
CB Mark Haynes (Den.), Dwayne Woodruff (Pitt.), Mark Haynes (Den.),
Eric Everett (Phil.)
P Mike Horan (Den.), Barry Helton (S.F.)
K Mike Lansford (Rams), John Carney (T.B.)
KR Gerald McNeil (Cleve.)
This team may not be that bad, I guess they can finish with more wins
than at least Dallas, maybe....
Charles
|
143.2 | All Qbs available | JUPITR::MOK | Charles P. Mok | Sat Feb 03 1990 14:17 | 26 |
| For all you Plan B QB hunters out there, here's all those who are
available:
Scott Campbell (Atl.)
Gale Gilbert (Buff.)
Turk Schonert (Cin.)
Babe Laufenberg (Dal.)
Blair Kiel (G.B.)
Tom Ramsey (Ind.)
Don Strock (Ind.)
Ron Jarwoski (K.C.)
Mark Herrmann (Rams)
Cliff Stoudt (Miami)
Tommy Kramer (Minn.)
Doug Flutie (N.E.)
Jeff Rutledge (Giants)
Pat Ryan (Jets)
Neil Lomax (Phoenix)*
Todd Blackledge (Pitt.)
David Archer (S.D.)
Kerwin Bell (T.B.)
Joe Ferguson (T.B.)
Doug Williams (Wash.)
* retired
|
143.3 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | ACC=ACookedCrisp | Mon Feb 05 1990 08:15 | 6 |
| Supposedly Lansford was told by the Rams not to worry about
being a Plan B, that he was going to be signed. The league is
investigating. I have no idea what the punishment would be if the
Rams are found guilty.
/Don
|
143.4 | | FSCORE::PAVEZKA | I didn't start the fire....did U? | Mon Feb 05 1990 08:22 | 4 |
| Apparently, teams do not protect any kickers. There is an unwritten
rule amongst teams not to sign any other teams' kickers.
pete
|
143.5 | Re... | JUPITR::MOK | Charles P. Mok | Mon Feb 05 1990 10:41 | 10 |
| The "secret arrangement" kind of thing is done by most teams anyway.
The 49ers reportedly do this all the time and tell their veterans just
"stay" and they will be rewarded. If the Rams is "caught" they will be
the team singled out, which is unfair.
About not signing anyone else's kicker, well, if there's is such a
rule, then it will be a clear violation. Also, some teams protected
their kickers I think, am I correct?
Charles
|
143.6 | Get out the checkbook, Dick Steinberg | HOTSHT::SCHNEIDER | When it hits, you feel okay | Mon Feb 05 1990 11:33 | 7 |
| Is there any compensation for signing a Plan B guy? I see a few guys
out there I think the Jets should nab, particularly Dixon and Irvin in the
secondary and any offensive lineman you can fog a mirror. These guys
may be a little long in the tooth, but if there's no fee, they probably have
a few more useful years.
Dan
|
143.7 | | AUSTIN::MACNEAL | Big Mac | Mon Feb 05 1990 11:39 | 1 |
| Dan, I'm pretty sure there is no compensation for a plan B free agent.
|
143.8 | | COMET::MONTGOMERY | Bible,Koran,Donk Newspaper | Mon Feb 05 1990 11:49 | 9 |
| > Dan, I'm pretty sure there is no compensation for a plan B free agent.
that's right Big Mac, No compensation.....
Whoever comes up with the most money win's!!!!
Monty
|
143.9 | | FSHQA1::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Mon Feb 05 1990 12:27 | 4 |
| Not only is there no compensation, in fact, their current team cannot
even talk to a Plan B Free Agent until April 1.
John
|
143.10 | | JULIET::MAY_BR | Wimp football rules! | Tue Feb 06 1990 19:26 | 5 |
| I don't think the Jets want Irwin. He was cut by the Rams this
year and was re-signed after they had a few injuries. They could
have had Irwin this year.
Bruce
|
143.11 | On Irvin | JUPITR::MOK | Charles P. Mok | Tue Feb 06 1990 21:21 | 8 |
| Irvin did not play too bad, but he has other problems. He got into the
fight promotion business and there are reports of some shady dealings
with underworld people etc. The Rams may not mind getting rid of him
for less distraction. Irvin himself said at the end of last season
that he would not mind quitting football altogether and plunge into his
"business."
Charles
|
143.12 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Here comes the SUN! | Wed Feb 07 1990 10:41 | 3 |
| Wouldn't George Allen simple have loved Plan B!
Sarge
|
143.13 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Is Nothing Sacred? | Wed Feb 07 1990 10:55 | 8 |
|
re: .10 ::MAY_BR "Wimp football Rules!"
Hey Bruce, does this P-name refer to football rules that are wimpy,
or do you mean it as in "Wimp football *ROOLZ* (v. trans.)
-Just curious
|
143.14 | Some interesting TE's available..Plan B | IAMOK::AHEARN | | Wed Feb 07 1990 12:52 | 17 |
| I would think that Jay Novacek (Phoenix Cardinals Tight End/H-Back)
would be highly sought after in the Plan B market. Any team that
incorporates the TE in their passing game would be wise to give him a
look. With Mickey Shuler coming off of an injury...with the Raiders
going back to 'Raider Football'.....with Ozzie Newsome nearing
retirement (even though they have Lawyer Tillman....Tillman would
prefer to remain a wide-out)....with Pete Holohan in his
thirties.....any one of these teams could use a TE with Novacek's
talents (pass catcher....not much of a blocker!!). I'd like for the
Pats to sign him, but they're too hung up on having an OL for a TE
instead of a pass-catcher (Eric Sievers had a good year for them in
'89, maybe they'll continue to go to the TE in the '90s...and Sievers
is in his early to mid thirties).
Nelly
|
143.15 | Anything's an improvement | HOTSHT::SCHNEIDER | When it hits, you feel okay | Wed Feb 07 1990 13:24 | 8 |
| >I don't think the Jets want Irwin. He was cut by the Rams this
>year and was re-signed after they had a few injuries. They could
>have had Irwin this year.
You should've seen Bobby Humphrey play this year. If Irwin's not on
crutches, I'll take him,.
Dan
|
143.16 | | JULIET::MAY_BR | Wimp football rules! | Wed Feb 07 1990 19:18 | 3 |
| re wimp football rules:
Last year MrT said the 49ers played wimp football.
|
143.17 | ??? | HPSRAD::SANTOS | A monster is being built. | Thu Feb 08 1990 12:00 | 8 |
| I have a question these plan B guys. If they don't sign with anybody
else by April 1, there present team gets to resign them. Does that
mean they get a new contract or do they just continue with the contract
they had before Feb 1st. What happens if there team doesn't want them
back, do they still get the money from the contract they had or is that
contract void too.
Chuck
|
143.18 | One-year deals make it work | SHALOT::HUNT | Thirtysomething Mutant Ninja Daddy | Thu Feb 08 1990 12:29 | 27 |
| � I have a question these plan B guys. If they don't sign with anybody
� else by April 1, there present team gets to resign them. Does that
� mean they get a new contract or do they just continue with the contract
� they had before Feb 1st. What happens if there team doesn't want them
� back, do they still get the money from the contract they had or is that
� contract void too.
One of the things that makes this Plan B thing work is that *most*
of the player contracts that are called "multi-year" are in truth
just a series of one-year deals.
I'm sure you can recall reading about or hearing about Joe
Linebacker "signing a series of 4 one-year contracts for a total
of $1.25 million" or something similar ...
So given that Joe Linebacker had a separate contract for 1988,
another for 1989, yet another for 1990, and so on, it then becomes
easier to see how Plan B works.
If the team puts Joe on the Plan B list and another team signs
him, then his old team is released from the rest of the one-year
deals. If no other team signs Joe, his original team just
executes the next year's deal and the cycle continues.
At least, this is my understanding ...
Bob Hunt
|
143.19 | | SALEM::RIEU | We're Taxachusetts...AGAIN! | Thu Feb 08 1990 12:29 | 4 |
| According to Bob Woolf, NO teams have shown any interest in Dougie
or Don Majkowski. Majik however, would require 2 number 1 picks to
the Pack in return.
Denny
|
143.20 | | COOKIE::MJOHNSTON | Life'sAfemaleDog!? WhatayaMean? | Thu Feb 08 1990 12:35 | 6 |
| I'd really be surprised if the Raiders show no interest in Majkowski. He seems
to fit the Raider image: a hard nosed kid who takes no crap and has a real
drive to win, and the skills to make it happen. I was surprised he didn't make
the All-Madden Team (or did he?).
Mike JN
|
143.21 | | FSHQA2::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Thu Feb 08 1990 13:04 | 31 |
| Long-term, NFL contracts are either the type Bob Hunt talks about,
a series of 1-year deals, or a true multi-year contract. The reason
few people move after the expiration of a contract is the NFL
compensation rule. A team signing a Plan A free agent (one of the
37 protected players whose contract has just happened to expire)
must give compensation to the team losing the player. That was
why the Redskins had to give the Bears a couple of draft choices
for Wilber Marshall.
What the team is saying to a Plan B free agent in effect is to go
ahead and make his own deal with someone else, the player is free
to do so. If a player isn't interested in leaving or if no one
else is interested in that player, he's no worse off than he was
before. If he's got a multi-year contract, the team that he was
with must either retain him or cut him loose. If he's got a contract
that has expired, then the team has the choice of whether to exercise
its option on him.
The only differences with the existence of Plan B are that a player
can go out and change teams without any compensation being due to
the original team (which should theoretically allow for more player
movement), and a player in the middle of a true multi-year contract
can make a move instead of being bound to a team.
Keep in mind the following: Unlike basketball and baseball, which
have true multi-year contracts that are guaranteed, there are no
guarantees in the NFL. A player can be cut loose at any time with
no guarantees, except for money owed for playing during the season,
and the half-season minimum for vested veterans.
John
|
143.22 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | WitnessProtectionProgram | Thu Feb 08 1990 14:18 | 4 |
| John's right as usual. I read where there are 4 or 5 guaranteed
contracts in the entire NFL.
/Don
|
143.23 | | COMET::MONTGOMERY | Bible,Koran,Donk Newspaper | Thu Feb 08 1990 14:30 | 8 |
| re: john
Then is it true that , if a QB has 2 years left on his contract and is on Plan
B and a team from the Dark Side wants him, that his contract is now void with
that team(last team played for)??? I thought that the contract was legal
binding type of thing?????
Monty
|
143.24 | | COOKIE::MJOHNSTON | Life'sAfemaleDog!? WhatayaMean? | Thu Feb 08 1990 14:38 | 13 |
| � Then is it true that , if a QB has 2 years left on his contract and is on
� Plan B and a team from the Dark Side wants him, that his contract is now void
� with that team(last team played for)??? I thought that the contract was
� legal binding type of thing?????
Monty
The QB doesn't HAVE to sign with the team that wants him. If they want
him, and he wants the move, and the money offered, he can go... current
contract nullified. If he doesn't want the team or the money, he can stay,
contract in force.
Mike JN
|
143.25 | All Madden | JUPITR::MOK | Charles P. Mok | Thu Feb 08 1990 15:15 | 5 |
| Maj was one of the 3 QBs named by Madden (Montana, Elway other two) not
counting Cunningham as a punter.
Charles
|
143.26 | | SALEM::RIEU | We're Taxachusetts...AGAIN! | Thu Feb 08 1990 15:23 | 2 |
| Yeah but didn't he drop Mr. Ed when he say him in the wimp suit?
Denny
|
143.27 | more details... | FDCV07::GARBARINO | | Fri Feb 09 1990 10:09 | 13 |
| As someone said, there are only 4 or 5 guaranteed contracts in the NFL.
All other players MUST MAKE THE TEAM EACH YEAR TO GET THEIR MONEY.
Therefore, if a Plan B free agent has a multi-year deal with "former"
team, doesn't sign with a new team, and isn't kept by "former" team,
he's not only unemployed, he doesn't get a paycheck.
If Plan B free agent's contract has expired, and he doesn't sign with a
new team, "former" team can sign him, but it must be for at least 100%
of the value of his previous contract. If "former" team doesn't sign
him between 4/1-4/15, he is again free to negotiate with any other team.
Joe
|
143.28 | ug | COMET::JACKSONTA | No football = less Junk noting | Fri Feb 09 1990 10:33 | 5 |
| I think all these new rules are getting confusing. There are quite
a few good players left unsigned, and it will be interesting to see
what happens.
Tim
|