T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
132.1 | GET READY FOR THREE-PEAT | LUDWIG::GARRY | Helllpppp | Sun Jan 28 1990 23:24 | 13 |
| I enjoyed this game immenseley as I had the 49ers and over the total
pts for some pocket change,as for the game there really wasn't one
it looked like a typical niner practice ,these 2 teams were definitely
the best there conferences could offer,in the AFC the Broncos wrapped
up the division by week 11 and coasted ,and SF had the best record
in football.I really think that the niners are this good and they
could've made the score worse if they wanted too.That now ties the
competition at 12-12 in the big game but the only team from the
AFC to win in the last 10 years is the Raiders,the bottom line is
the NFC is far superior and I don't see it changing for a while.
Tom
|
132.2 | Niners In A Beating! | CSC32::G_MCINTOSH | Vom Hochland German Shepards | Mon Jan 29 1990 04:19 | 19 |
| Well that was some beating the 49ers handed out. Must REALLY be
frustrating for Bronco fans.
Congratulations to the 9ers. Truly the best of the decade.
It's unfortunate that Mecklenberg may have to have knee surgery. On
the leg whip by the 49er Offensive Lineman (I don't remember who) Meck
took the blow. KOA Post Game Show interviewed Meck and he said that
he'll have athroscopic surgery on Tuesday AM, and will probably need
knee surgery following.
Additionally, the "Voice of the Broncos", Bob Martin of KOA Radio was
admitted to a New Orleans hospital early yesterday morning for surgery
for bone cancer and didn't announce the game on KOA. I wish you well
Bob!
Live from Charger Central....
Glenn
|
132.3 | | SAGE::ROSS | Custer,Mondale,Cooney,Elway | Mon Jan 29 1990 05:21 | 6 |
| Elway made Terry Bradshaw look like Albert Einstein.... and that's not
easy to do.
My only question: Who will claim credit for the innovative shovel pass
blitzkrieg offense that took Denver out of the game from the start?
|
132.4 | | COOKIE::CHAVEZ | Dale - CXN Colo Spgs | Mon Jan 29 1990 06:40 | 25 |
| Does it get any easier to swallow these kind of losses?? Hell no!
Do I still love the Broncs? Hell yes! Did someone get the number
of that train yesterday? It's hard to believe that Montana keeps
getting BETTER each game...gawd the Niners were awesome.
Not much you can say about Denver...never in my wildest dreams did I
think it would be this big of a blowout. It's hard to pinpoint any
particular weakness (short of saying it was a 'team loss'). There is
something in the preparation that prevents Denver from being mentally
and emotionally ready for each Super Bowl.
Little things that are going to make the off-season a long one (granted,
they probably wouldn't have made much difference in the outcome):
- Mark Jackson's drop
- Humphrey's fumble
- Mark Haynes untimely appearance in the game
- Atwater's unability to make a presence (again)
- Elway's very off day...played like a rookie
'Nuff said. I know you anti-Donk fans are anxious and waiting...
so....let the bashing begin.
Dale
|
132.5 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Is Nothing Sacred? | Mon Jan 29 1990 07:00 | 6 |
|
Bashing the Donks at this point would be nothing more than beating
a dead horse. Let 'em rest in peace.
-Dick
|
132.6 | One for the thumb in '91? | DECWIN::JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Mon Jan 29 1990 07:25 | 15 |
| If any one factor can be identified as "what made the difference", I
think it was the 49ers pass protection. No secondary in the world can
cover Rice, Taylor, and co. forever. When a QB gets the amount of time
to throw that the 49ers offensive line afforded Joe Montana yesterday,
someone WILL get open sooner or later. I'm sure much will be written
both in this conference and the press about John Elway's off day, but
the fact that "Montana wasn't even knocked down" was I think much more
significant.
Gonna be tough to bet against the 49ers to "threepeat".
py
P.S. If Bubba Paris is 299 then I'm Mike Tyson... :-)
|
132.7 | When will the "rehash" begin? | SASE::SZABO | | Mon Jan 29 1990 07:39 | 8 |
| The base note, .0, is in extremely poor taste. Sorry guy, but why
create a "SuperBowl rehash" note without a sigle rehash of the game?
You could've bashed the Broncos and their entire dismal SB history in
the Broncos note.
I agree with Dick H. Bashing them now is just totally useless......
Hawk
|
132.8 | No Joy In Mile High City | CECV01::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey's Dad - born 1/1/90 | Mon Jan 29 1990 08:05 | 19 |
| I know there are a lot of Bronco fans in the conference, and I guess
they knwo how the Pats fans felt after playing the Bears. That
year there was no team in the league that was going to beat the
Bears, and this year nobody was going to beat the Niners.
Go easy on Elway. All season the Niner defense played very controled
and professionally, but yesterday they looked really pumped and
emotional. The secondary did a great job covering, and that resulted
in a lot of pressure, rushed trows, etc.
The thing that made the game watchable, despite teh score, was the
skill of the Niner passing game. Montana and his receivers seem
to know each other so well, that they really click. The most exciting
play in football is Montana hitting Rice over the middle and watching
him run.
Hang in there Bronco fans - the team had a great year.
=Bob=
|
132.9 | Bad base note | BROOKE::LAZARUSD | Dave Lazarus NYA DSS 321-5183 | Mon Jan 29 1990 08:24 | 8 |
| re: .7
You're right. I put the base note in after just having watched the
game. Those were my gut reactions immediately afterward.
I might have more accurately titled it as "bash the broncos
note".
|
132.10 | Go Broncos !!!! | QUASER::HUNTER | Jack's Diner, No Brains, No Service | Mon Jan 29 1990 08:25 | 8 |
| Hate to rehash this thing but I have to make one point.....
The Bronocs are still better than anyother team in the AFC.
Yea, Elway Choked and the rest of the team followed him right
down the tubes but I'm still behind them. The Broncos are
a good team and exciting as hell to watch, well in regular season
anyway... ;^) Hope the donks can come back from this..
Big Game
|
132.11 | How many played on all four? | SHALOT::MEDVID | Sacrifice for a new nirvana | Mon Jan 29 1990 08:47 | 11 |
| RE: one for the thumb in '91
Just curious, how many of the 49ers have played in all four SBs? I
know Montana and Lott did. Who else has a chance for five rings?
RE: .10
You're reaching now. I guess losers have to. Even the Oilers would
have held up better.
--dan'l
|
132.12 | | DECWIN::JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Mon Jan 29 1990 09:05 | 7 |
| re .11:
I believe that Keena Turner has also played on all four Super Bowl
teams.
py
|
132.13 | 4 SB vets / Purdue etc. | JUPITR::MOK | Charles P. Mok | Mon Jan 29 1990 09:22 | 18 |
| Yeah Keena Turner (another Boiler :)
Also: Wilson and Eric Wright. All together 5 of them. There is an
article on the 5 of them in last week's SI.
Talking about Turner, Purdue has players (in fact starters) in all of
the final four teams in the playoffs:
SF: Turner.
LA: Everett, Strickland; Herrmann
Denver: M. Jackson.
Pitt: Woodson; (I think maybe one other reserve RB whose name I
forgot?)
Which (any) other college claims that?
Charles
|
132.14 | | CSCOA5::ROLLINS_R | | Mon Jan 29 1990 09:33 | 7 |
| > Talking about Turner, Purdue has players (in fact starters) in all of
> the final four teams in the playoffs:
> Pitt: Woodson; (I think maybe one other reserve RB whose name I
> forgot?)
Pittsburgh didn't make it to the conference championship; Cleveland did.
|
132.15 | | COMET::MONTGOMERY | The Denver Vikings | Mon Jan 29 1990 09:34 | 10 |
| >There is
>something in the preparation that prevents Denver from being mentally
>and emotionally ready for each Super Bowl.
Yes Dale it's called Dan Reeves... hahahahahhahahahahahahahah8^)))))))))
|
132.16 | Joe Montana - Mr BIG in the BIG game!! | FRSBEE::WORRALL | | Mon Jan 29 1990 09:41 | 10 |
| Well once again "THE MAN" showed why he is the best in the pressure
games. And Imagine all this got started way back when. The Fighting
Irish behind the Cougars of Houston by many. Mr Montana brings the
Irish back from the dead. Time and time again, he is performing in
the big game on another level. My hat is off to Denver, what can you
do in a game like yesterdays??? John Elway needs to face a mortal team
in the superbowl. There is no need to rub it in or bash, you saw the
game yesterday, no words or descriptions are needed.
Greg
|
132.17 | | COOKIE::MJOHNSTON | Putcher money whereyer mouse is! | Mon Jan 29 1990 09:56 | 17 |
| If the same people who voted for the mythical College National
Championship were to vote for the NFL World Champions, The Green Bay Packers
would now own the title.
Rationale:
SF 49'ers (Notre Dame) = reigning champs
SF 49'ers (Notre Dame) Lose to Green Bay ( Miami Hurricanes )
SF 49'ers (Notre Dame) Win over #1 AFC Champs Denver (#1 Colo Buffs)
SF 49'ers (Notre Dame) has best overall record.
Decision????? Simple right?
Championship to Green Bay ( Miami ).
Whadda cuntrry!!!
Mike JN
|
132.18 | | SASE::SZABO | | Mon Jan 29 1990 09:58 | 5 |
| Mike JN, I see that the hallugeons (tm) haven't worn off yet......
:-)
Hawk
|
132.19 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Bradshaw knows Elway | Mon Jan 29 1990 10:01 | 8 |
|
Actually Monty, when you have a QB that chokes like "The Duke" (hahaha
hahaa I love that nickname) Lombardi could be your coach and it
wouldn't matter......
mike
|
132.20 | So who's Florida State ??? The Vikings ??? | SHALOT::HUNT | Thirtysomething Mutant Ninja Daddy | Mon Jan 29 1990 10:16 | 13 |
| Mike,
Your analogy comparing the Miami Hurricanes to the Green Bay
Packers would ring true if for only one small detail ...
Green Bay lost 6 games while the Hurricanes lost only 1 game
therefore San Francisco's loss to Green Bay is rightfully
considered a huge upset while Notre Dame's loss to Miami was *no*
upset at all.
Otherwise, nice try.
Bob Hunt
|
132.21 | Congrads San Fran and Denver!!!!!!!!!!!! | FROSTY::CONNOR | | Mon Jan 29 1990 10:19 | 21 |
| To all of you Bronco fans I feel your pain but don't hang your
heads!!!!
I remember watching poor Eason and Grogan getting crushed by the
Bears and losing the way New England did was painful. But like
Elway said "at least we got our chance at bat" Hey Denver keeps
on making it to the Super bowl that's a hell of alot better than
our Patriots could do,we had one flash in the pan and see you later.
Congrads to Denver and 9er's you were the best the game had to offer
and I enjoyed the entire NFL season!!!
As a total New England Patriot and Doug Flutie fan (God only knows)
You can bet your boots Denver will be there next year,Elway has
alot to learn and a long career ahead of him!!!
"one mans opion"
JIMBO
|
132.22 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | Remember the Massachusetts 54th ! | Mon Jan 29 1990 10:26 | 26 |
| If Lombardi was coach, he'd had started Kubiak ....
The Niners have a chance to become THE dyansty in NFL, maybe pro
sports history. The Steelers won 4 titles with essentially the same
team. When the old guard went out, the Steelers faded from the scene.
Back in 1980, few people really thought that "One For The Thumb"
was likely. Not so in this case. This is a pretty young team.
Craig, Lott, Montana, and Hicks are the elder statesmen. Looka t
the 81 team :
Montana, Elliott, Solomon, Clark, Board, Lott, Williams, Harris,
Hicks, Stuckey, Wersching.
In 84 Craig, Turner, Montana, Dean, Solomon, Tyler, Kelcher, Johnson, and
Monroe.
Now add Rathman, Holt, Millan, Fuller, Brooks, Rice, Taylor, Jones,
Cofer, Young, McKyer, Griffith, ect.
You don't see this type of quality turnover on very many teams,
let alone perennial champions.
Not only is SF a quality team, but they have a quality front office.
And that's why SF will have a very good shot at being team of the
90's.
|
132.23 | | JUPITR::MOK | Charles P. Mok | Mon Jan 29 1990 10:26 | 1 |
| Re:.14 you're right :)
|
132.24 | no disgrace | CSSE::POTTER | | Mon Jan 29 1990 11:20 | 13 |
|
9ers were simply the best this year.
I don't see the reason to bash Elway or the Broncos. They have lost
the SB 3 times (4th was in the 70s), all 3 times they were overmatched.
Should they be be belittled because they were second best in the league
3 out of 4 years? I don't think so...
Elway's best game would have only made the score respectable as in
35-21 or something. So he had a bad day and the guy is human.
Montana I'm not so sure about...
Corn
|
132.25 | Not that it would have changed a thing... | SHALOT::MEDVID | Sacrifice for a new nirvana | Mon Jan 29 1990 11:45 | 5 |
| Did anyone else besides me and Madden notice the shot Lott delivered to
a receiver's head in the second quarter. It was really blatant. I
don't see how the refs missed that one. 15 and a first down.
--dan'l
|
132.26 | | CSC32::MENDEZ | | Mon Jan 29 1990 11:48 | 14 |
| .24
I agree the 9ers were on a roll this year. The 9ers could have put the
same score up on the vikings in the first playoff game. As awesome as
the 9ers looked it is a fine line between a three-peat and missing the
playoffs entirely. I was watching the game with a bunch of bronco fans
and I was really feeling sorry for them because NO ONE would have
beaten the 9ers yesterday. I thought that Denver would have better
coaching then they did. The Broncos NEVER adjusted defensively or
offensively. The Broncos were not prepared from any standpoint for
what they faced. The funny part is that contrary to popular belief in
this notesfile, Denver was the BEST that the AFC had to offer. If
Cleveland had showed up it might have been a shutout.
Frank "9er" Mendez
|
132.27 | Joke | SHALOT::MEDVID | Sacrifice for a new nirvana | Mon Jan 29 1990 11:54 | 14 |
| And one more before I kill this conference today and get some work
done...
Came up with the following in an extremely productive meeting this
morning:
The Broncos *did* have two long drives yesterday...
To and from the SuperDome!
--dan'l
|
132.29 | Broncos Will Be Back! | CX3COM::J_COTANCH | | Mon Jan 29 1990 11:55 | 22 |
|
The 49ers wouldn't have lost to anyone yesterday, even a team "from
Mars" wouldn't have beat them, as Roger Craig put it. I'm just
disappointed that the Broncos didn't put together a better performance
for the nation, because they aren't nearly as bad as they showed
yesterday. I'm still very proud of the season they had, considering
not very many "experts" were picking them to even make the playoffs,
let alone the Super Bowl. It seems all we heard about preseason
favorites to win the AFC were Cincinnati, Buffalo, and Houston.
Also, Denver should be even better next year, with rookies like
Atwater and Humphrey having a year of experience in the NFL.
As for you guys saying that Notre Dame should be #1, give it a rest.
ND and Miami both had one loss, but the Canes whipped the Irish!!
Sounds pretty simple to me.
Congratulations to the 49ers, and they do deserve to be called the
Team of the 80's in the NFL, just as Miami is the Team of the 80's
in college football.
Joe
|
132.30 | | COOKIE::MJOHNSTON | Putcher money whereyer mouse is! | Mon Jan 29 1990 12:09 | 7 |
| One thing I was pleased about with regard to the Superbowel (tm)
(if a Donk fan could find anything to be pleased about), was that the Refs did
a pretty good job of keeping their hankies in their pockets and letting things
move along. Win, lose, or draw, I hate it when the Refs litter the field on
every play.
Mike JN
|
132.31 | #1 if AFC =/= #2 in NFL | DECWET::CROUCH | Grand marshall of the dork parade | Mon Jan 29 1990 13:29 | 16 |
| re .24
I don't see how being the best in the AFC automatically means you are
the second best in the league. In recent years, the top few teams in
the NFC appear to be better than the AFC has to offer.
I was driving home after the game and was listening to the post-game
show on the radio. Pinhead Musberger had a plan. He would like to
see the playoffs set up without regard to conference, so that the Super
Bowl would be the best two teams. Of course, when asked about details,
he couldn't make up any on the spot, so he said he just thought he'd
throw that "grenade" out there. Stop it, Brent, your just a
controversy machine!
Pete
|
132.32 | the REAL reason | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Tarhells,Dean:==Broncos | Mon Jan 29 1990 15:41 | 48 |
|
I've done some thinking. It wasn't John Elway, or Dan Reeves, or
Bobby Humphry or and Bronco player that cost them this game, and
other Super Bowls, but it was nature. Specifically, water. That's right,
H2O, the giver of life - water, as in oceans, or lakes, or mighty
rivers.
Most of the winning Super Bowl teams come from water places - Oakland,
San Francisco, Miami, Pittsburth (3 rivers), the Jets and Giants,
Chicago, Kansas City (the mighty Mississippi) - all with the favor of
WATER. I don't know enough about Green Bay's water situation. The
one aberration is Dallas, but they lost 3 games, and there two
victories include only one over a water team (the Dolphins), and one
over a fellow non-water team (the Broncos).
Ah, you say, what about Minnesota, land of 10,000 lakes - ah yes, but
look at the teams they lost to - Kansas City - the Mississippi,
Oakland, the Bay, Pittsburgh- the 3 rivers, and Miami - the Atlantic
Ocean. Poor Minnesota was outclassed.
Yep, it's water. Not a good situation for Denver fans - perhaps a
large lake built downtown would work? Nah, it has to natural.
The Broncos only hope is to play another non-water team - and
there are few - atlanta, dallas, houston, phoenix...
Dallas - part of the Texas problem - for all of it's swaggering, the
Cowboys have the only 2 pro champeenships for the great state of Texas -
directly attributable to their overall lack of water. And Houston went
one step further by building a dome, and thoroughly p*ss*ng the water
gods off! That's why Dallas left the hole in the stadium - to appease
the gods of water!
And back to Minnesota - they snubbed the water gods that let them down
by building the dome. The Vikings may never reach the Bowl again!
And I thought about Seattle - a place perfect for the water gods to shine
on - but no, another DOME! The Seahawks are doomed by the Dome. Water
power is strongest here, and they snubbed it.
So folks, that's the real reason behind the blowouts. How are non-water,
totally dry teams like the Broncos going to beat teams with the
power of the Hudson and the Atlantic, the Potamic and Cheaspeake Bay,
and the San Francisco Bay and the Pacif Ocean behind them! A tough road
to hoe.
Think about it.
JD
|
132.33 | | COOKIE::MJOHNSTON | Putcher money whereyer mouse is! | Mon Jan 29 1990 15:51 | 5 |
| You may have just uncovered a major find, JD!
BRING ON THE SAHARA BEDOUINS! THE DONKS'LL * K I L L * `EM!!
Mike JN
|
132.34 | | NRADM::KING | FUR...the look that KILLS... | Mon Jan 29 1990 19:20 | 5 |
| Even Macdonald's feels sorry for the DOnks. After all the hoopla
about the the 2 hamburgers be cheaper Macs decided that after the
Mcbashing the Donks too that they can have a cheap burger too.
REK
|
132.35 | no mas | 33328::BMCWILLIAMS | Improvise if you have to ... | Mon Jan 29 1990 20:20 | 12 |
| Why don't they start playing the conference title games in a "neutral" stadium,
like they do the Super Bowl?
That way, odds are Denver won't manage to win the AFC championship again next
year, and we can see how someone else does against the NFC's best.
Pittsburgh vs. 49ers: now THAT would have been a real David/Goliath matchup.
Denver had no right standing in the way of destiny. For that reason, I took
some satisfaction in seeing Denver get thrashed. But enough is enough. Keep
these guys away from the big game next year.
Brian
|
132.36 | | RT32::KAUFMANN | It's a boy! | Tue Jan 30 1990 06:58 | 11 |
| RE: .32
>> Chicago, Kansas City (the mighty Mississippi) - all with the favor of
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
JD,
Er, ahem, KC is in western Missouri, and the Mississippi borders
the eastern side of the state. The Missouri River flows past KC.
Bo, a geography buff
|
132.37 | liquid assets | AUNTB::HAAS | Die, laugh I thought I'd | Tue Jan 30 1990 07:44 | 9 |
| JD, one small nit in your otherwise loquacious aquarian theorem:
KC ain't on the Mississippi. It may be on the Missouri and you're back to
your water angle again.
I guess if you extend the idea, it would predict where to go for
expansion teams.
TTom
|
132.38 | | GENRAL::WADE | That'sprettyboldtalkfora1eyedfatman | Tue Jan 30 1990 08:25 | 12 |
| re .35
Every team has 8 home/away games. If you don't want Denver to
have the home field advantage throughout the playoffs, have your
team put up a better record.
Denver had the most "right" of any AFC team to be in the Super
Bowl. Anybody that thinks their AFC team would have fared any
better is talking out his a$$ cuz his mouth knows better. "no
right to stand in the way of destiny"...what a ludicrous statement.
Claybone
|
132.39 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Tarhells,Dean:==Broncos | Tue Jan 30 1990 08:26 | 7 |
| OOPS - the Might Missouri folks, yeah, that's what I meant. Just
wanted to show I could spell Mississippi!! So, what about Green
Bay - I mean the Bay part sounds like water to me. I predict the
Tampa Bay Bucs will win a super bowl before the Houston Oilers or
Phoenix Cardinals, simply due to the water power of Tampa Bay.
JD
|
132.40 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jan 30 1990 09:35 | 6 |
|
Green Bay, as seems logical, is on Green Bay, an inlet off of Lake
Michigan. I'd say that counts. Pretty good theory.
glenn
|
132.41 | The Third Coast | AUSTIN::MACNEAL | Big Mac | Tue Jan 30 1990 09:42 | 3 |
| The Dallas/water relationship: Although Dallas is pretty far inland
and there isn't a major river nearby, Texas does boast a very large
coastline.
|
132.42 | got my goat going | CNTROL::CHILDS | Bradshaw knows Elway | Tue Jan 30 1990 13:02 | 15 |
|
Claybone and the rest of the denver jihad you guys got a lot filberts
talking about Pittsburg like that. They clearly outplayed the Donks
in donkeyland but due to outside interference we're left a point
short. Talk about pulling horseshoes out of your butt, the donks used
so many that day they had none left for the niners.....
And yes the Steelers would have given the niners a better game. Why?
because Reeves and Elway aren't on the Steelers. Bobby H. made some
good yardage on the field goal drive but the minute they got down 11
Reeves disdain the run and passed with a QB who was clearly not up to
the task. Plus the Steelers secondary doesn't behave like my breakfast
bread....
mike
|
132.43 | | GENRAL::WADE | That'sprettyboldtalkfora1eyedfatman | Tue Jan 30 1990 13:57 | 9 |
| Mikey C.
What did I say about Pittsburgh? What outside interference?
Did the football gods make their center hike the ball to
Bubby's ankles? Your generalizations are getting tiresome.
Geez, do you guys take numbers and then bash the Donks when
your number is called?
Claybone
|
132.44 | and of course my standard Elway sucks just for you | CNTROL::CHILDS | Bradshaw knows Elway | Thu Feb 01 1990 06:42 | 19 |
|
I don't wait for my number to be called Claybone I bash the donks
whenever I can. ;^)
Outside interference was the refs, who failed to review questionable
plays that when they had ruled them in the donks favor (Worley's
fumble, Nittel's supposed reception) or to allow Bubby to audiablize
by asking the crowd to tone it down a bit or penalize the donks for
excessive noise. While I really don't like the rule it was certainly
there but wasn't enforced. Shall we talk about the amount of
penalities? what was it 12 to 1? How many offisdes did they call on
Pitt? about 7 or 8 yet Kay is clearly moving forward on a touchdown
but no call?
Or the goddam fg that hit crossbar and bounced through? Denver was out
played every phase of the game except the score....
mike
|
132.45 | | CAM::WAY | The Saw is Family | Thu Feb 01 1990 07:06 | 26 |
| Re Water:
Yes, JD, you've hit the matter right on the (well)head, if I may say
so...
Green Bay held a magical charm over water. In the Ice Bowl, during
the huddle before the play where Bart Starr ran the QB sneak to get
the winning TD, he can be seen gently patting the ground and muttering
an incantation for the water to freeze harder....if anyone don't believe
me -- watch the films...
Green Bay had such a magical hold over water that they were able to
defeat KC and Oakland by turning the spirit of the Mighty Mo river
and the Bay against their home teams.
And I agree about domes....Seattle is in Washington, the Everwet state,
and all that rain would create wonderful mud for the Seahawks to play
in... In fact, they could be one of the dominant mud teams of all time.
Unfortunately, they couldn't serve Sushi to the folks from Bellevue
in the rain, so they built the dome, thus condemning the 'hawks
to a lifetime of mediocrity and barren seed.....
Chainsaw
|
132.47 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Thu Feb 01 1990 07:40 | 5 |
| So has the traditional "I'm going to Disney World" commercial been
aired yet?
py
|
132.48 | | HEURIS::METZGER | I will not Burp in class | Thu Feb 01 1990 07:42 | 9 |
|
I saw it the day after the bowl..
Joe Montana you just won your 4th super bowl and your third MVP what are you
going to do now ?
"I'm going to Disneyworld again"
|
132.49 | With a local flavor... | CAM::WAY | The Saw is Family | Thu Feb 01 1990 07:57 | 8 |
| The way I heard it:
"ACC Chris, you just duped countless noters with your fixed, rigged
crooked sham of a contest, and are now facing trial, what are you
going to do?"
"I'm going get the hell outta Dodge and go to Disneyworld!"
|
132.50 | | GENRAL::WADE | I mean what you know.... | Thu Feb 01 1990 08:32 | 7 |
| Steven, you beat me to it. See why I got on his case about not
being specific? Because his specifics sip! You forgot one
though....how does a "gd FG hitting the crossbar and going through"
help his case for the Donks being outplayed? I was rolling on
that one!
Claybone
|
132.51 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Marcos,TheShah,Duvaler,Knorr | Thu Feb 01 1990 08:45 | 7 |
| Mac,
You're right - the coast line must have helped the 'boys to their
two SB victories, but the distance from the shoreline weakened the
power when playing Pitts and Baltimore...
JD
|
132.52 | back at ya | CNTROL::CHILDS | Bradshaw knows Elway | Thu Feb 01 1990 09:29 | 18 |
|
Both play were questioned by the Steelers but the refs just set up the
ball and let the donks get at it. The donks to their credit got up and
ran quick plays in both instances to insure no overturn.
Bubby looked to the ref more than once for help with the crowd, the ref
looked away. If the crow noise wasn't a factor why then so may
offsides?
The FG just shows how incredible lucky the donks are.....
check the stats they were outplayed. the only good thing the donks
did all day was throw a couple of bomb.
and Steven the whinning doesn't help but I'm sick and tired of hearing
about the donks supposes superority when there wasn't any....
mike
|
132.53 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Go backoff in your own jack yard | Thu Feb 01 1990 09:32 | 7 |
| If you want to talk incredibly lucky, how about the extra point that
was blocked and fluttered, like a "Fudge" Kosar pass, over the
crossbar. Without that point, the game ends up in OT.
JaKe
|
132.55 | | GENRAL::WADE | I mean what you know.... | Thu Feb 01 1990 10:50 | 6 |
| Mike, please explain to me why the field goal making it through
was luck? Could it be that any time a field goal is made it
is luck that causes it to go through the goalposts? If so, I guess
all nfl teams are lucky...not just the Donks.
Claybone
|
132.56 | See who the best REALLY are | BUILD::MORGAN | | Thu Feb 01 1990 11:07 | 10 |
| Denver has the biggest home field advantage of any team in pro
football, between the altitude and the crowd. Therefore, their
won-lost record is tainted. Therefore, they get home field advantage.
Therefore, they get wacked in the Super Bowl which is played at a
neutral site.
As Cowboy says, it may be time to play the championship game at a
neutral site.
Steve
|
132.57 | | VIEW3D::MACGREGOR | | Thu Feb 01 1990 11:24 | 12 |
| First let me say that I'm a Raider fan and not a Bronco fan. That
said, I'll state that the altitude being a big home field advantage
is BS. It has been proven time after time that it would only be
a factor after 2-3 days. Since, during the regular season, teams
aren't required to show up that far in advance, they don't.
Thus, the regular season record isn't tainted by this "fact" and
it only becomes a factor during the playoffs, and ONLY if they have
home field advantage from better play during the season and if the
other team shows up 2-3 days in advance.
The Wizard
|
132.58 | | CAM::WAY | Vengeance is mine, sayeth the Saw | Thu Feb 01 1990 12:27 | 17 |
| Bubby did look at the ref during the last series...I saw him.
Also, anytime a field goal like that makes it it's skill. Ask the
kicker...what's he gonna tell you...I planned it that way?
Ask a goalie in hockey or soccer what he calls it when a shot beats
him and hits the poast? Luck. Ask a goal scorer what he calls
it when his shot beats the goalie and hits enough of the post to
bounce *in*? Luck.
The Broncos were lucky to win that game. Plain and simple. They
did not outplay Pittsburgh. Don't make it sound like the Broncos
are so great and that every break that goes their way is planned...
They proved just how "great" they are last Sunday...
JMHO,
'Saw
|
132.59 | | 8672::WADE | I mean what you know.... | Thu Feb 01 1990 12:52 | 18 |
| No Frank, you're wrong. Throwing dice and having them come
up a 7 is luck. Winning the lotto is luck. If it was luck
that the ball went through the uprights, they'd be kicking
them blindfolded! The kickers have a skill.....kicking the
ball between two goalposts. They use this skill to make
field goals. Some have better skill than others. On that
particular kick, Treadwell used his skill to put the ball
between the uprights. Did you guys even see the kick? It
barely grazed the inside of the upright. It's not like it
richocheted between the goalposts 149 times and them fell over.
Why can't I try to make things look like I think they do?
You anti's do it all the time! Denver won the afc
championship fair and square. Denver did not prove how
good they were Sunday.....the 49'ers proved how great they
are.
Claybone
|
132.60 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | C.Darrow,O.W.Holmes,MrT | Thu Feb 01 1990 13:12 | 0 |
132.61 | | CAM::WAY | Vengeance is mine, sayeth the Saw | Thu Feb 01 1990 15:16 | 30 |
| re .59
Well, I could go into quantum theory, and Shroedinger's Cat, and try
and convince you that every action of every second of every day is
a random chance event, but I don't have time 8^)
Seriously, I'm not disputing their skill, but when you talk about hitting
an upright, grazing a post, or clanging the post for a non-goal, I think
the outer bounds of skill are approaching randomness...
Consider the round hockey post. A puck can hit it such that it will bounce
into the net, or rebound away. A shooter cannot have such a granularity
of skill that he can control that. What basically happened was that
he was at the very edge of his area of accuracy, and it just happened to
be in enough that he scored.... To me, that's close enough to be called
luck.
Or, take the Immaculate Reception....was it not "luck" that the ball
bounced in such a way as to fall into Harris' hands? Was it not some
controlled randomness that Harris was within catching distance of it...
This really has me thinking...a new branch of Science...Sport Quantum
Theory!!!!
ahhh (sigh),
later,
'Saw
|
132.62 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Thu Feb 01 1990 15:59 | 3 |
|
With this most recent massacre hopefully the donks will finally get the
same officiating as everyone else.
|
132.63 | A mind is a terrible thing to waste...... | SASE::SZABO | | Fri Feb 02 1990 06:56 | 9 |
| Jeepums Crow, 'Saw, that was freakin' heavy sh*t you laid out there in
.61. After reading that, and understanding every word, my mind'll
never be the same...... I think I'll get a book about that Cat you
mentioned from the mall pet store. I want to keep this newly acquired
expansion of my mind going at full speed. Thanks!
You helped me.
Hawk'
|
132.64 | we'll be back | CNTROL::CHILDS | Bradshaw knows Elway | Fri Feb 02 1990 08:15 | 24 |
|
Claybone, you can call it skill if you like, I call it lucky. Let's
face it one of two things can happen it bounce back no good or bounce
thru. So imo it was lucky.
Steven you're right I never do call for stats cause I don't keep,
rarely check them so usually I get my foot in mouth when I refer
to them. In this case I will admit that they are closer than I though
but Pitt did get more yardage through the air and on the ground.
On the questionable calls you saw them one way I saw them another I
believe both of us are quilty of popb.....the fact of the matter is
that in most case you will see one of the refs step over the ball
and allow a review, we didn't in either case. While I'll agree the
fumble was a fumble, I'll never agree that Nattiel caught that ball.
Elway is notorious for short-hopping his receivers.
bottom line the donks won I don't believe they should have and I'll
have sourgrapes until the Steelers get a chance for revenge. With
that said I will not say anymore about this game as they are more
up to the minute issues that deserve attention....
mike
|
132.65 | | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | Beer me up Scotty | Fri Feb 02 1990 08:19 | 14 |
| > Ask a goal scorer what he calls it when his shot beats the goalie
> and hits enough of the post to bounce *in*? Luck.
No, the scorer will tell you he was aiming for the far/near post. He'll
say that's where he wanted it to go. It's like shooting at a target
with a gun. If you hit it, were you lucky? Hell no, that's what you
were aiming for. Treadwell hit the target, he just ended up hitting an
outer ring.
HTH
the devil dog
|
132.66 | More like this.... | CAM::WAY | Revenge is a dish best served cold... | Fri Feb 02 1990 08:29 | 18 |
| Gee, most of the interviews I see with guys like that, they usually do
the following:
(Big, wry, knowing smile) *Sure* I did exactly what I meant
to do. I purposely shot the puck at the goalie's filberts,
knowing that the trajectory of the puck off the goalies
jock/cup would be exactly enough for the puck to nick
the back 1/32" of his left skate blade, with enough
velocity and kinetic energy to rebound and hit the
inner arc portion of the circumference of the post,
dropping the puck onto the goaline with enough residual
velocity to have it move entirely cross the line.....*Yeah*,
that's the ticket...
Sometime, any hockey player will tell you, he gets a "lucky bounce"...
HTH 8^)
'Saw
|
132.67 | All the rest are just second best! | CSC32::MENDEZ | | Fri Feb 02 1990 08:37 | 7 |
| You guys could go on and on and on and on about the Broncos being
lucky and other teams being better than the Broncos. Remember
one fact the Champions of the NFL are SAN FRANCISCO 49ERS. And with
that all the other teams SUCK. smiley doodad goes here
Frank "9er" Mendez
|
132.68 | | GENRAL::WADE | I mean what you know.... | Fri Feb 02 1990 12:16 | 6 |
| It's funny that we consider a batter highly skilled who is successful
3 of 10 ten times. But, a guy who kicks a field goal is lucky even
though an average kicker is successful 6-7 times out of 10.....
whatever..........besides, my bladder is empty!
Claybone
|
132.69 | | COOKIE::MJOHNSTON | Putcher money whereyer mouse is! | Fri Feb 02 1990 12:41 | 7 |
| � Bubby did look at the ref during the last series...I saw him.
Actually, he looked at the Ref a lot. Bubble Blister (tm) was also
winking and making lewd suggestive motions at the ref. I think he may have
studied under Berni and Toni.
Mike JN
|
132.70 | | SCCAT::BOUCHARD | Ken Bouchard WRO3-2 | Fri Feb 02 1990 17:40 | 2 |
| There's definitely something to be said about getting totally blown out
in the SB.Take heart Bronco fans!
|
132.71 | SB Rehash?? | BOGUSS::ERICKSON | | Wed Feb 07 1990 12:31 | 2 |
| why do almost all of you create a sb rehash, then do nothing
except talk about how denver made through the playoffs??
|
132.72 | | CUJO::JOHNSTON | Kill em all, let God sort em out | Wed Feb 07 1990 12:47 | 5 |
|
JOHN DENVER WAS IN THE PLAYOFFS?!?!?!!?!?!?!?!!
MIKE JN
|
132.73 | | LEVERS::STROUT | Color our world blackened... | Wed Feb 07 1990 12:58 | 4 |
| Wait! Don't tell me! He was in the snoopy costume!!!!! dammit,
I thought I smelled grape nuts...
sean
|