| Title: | Digital Investing |
| Moderator: | a-61.tunnel.crl.dec.com::needle |
| Created: | Mon Nov 06 1995 |
| Last Modified: | Wed Jun 04 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 476 |
| Total number of notes: | 10632 |
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 418.1 | ESOP | FIREBL::LEEDS | From VAXinated to Alphaholic | Thu Dec 07 1995 17:36 | 9 |
| 418.2 | ever requested stock certificates? | ASDG::TREMBLAY | Hyperlinked to Cyberspace | Fri Dec 08 1995 09:22 | 2 |
| 418.3 | Basis of ESOP shares != 0 | TUXEDO::RAIZEN | twisted Alpha dreams | Tue Dec 12 1995 10:27 | 13 |
| 418.4 | cost basis for ESOP shares | ZYDECO::BODA | Realtime Expertise Center | Wed Dec 13 1995 09:17 | 9 |
| 418.5 | LJSRV1::RICH | i'm miss world | Thu Dec 14 1995 12:23 | 6 | |
| 418.6 | TUXEDO::RAIZEN | twisted Alpha dreams | Thu Dec 14 1995 14:31 | 15 | |
| 418.7 | LJSRV1::RICH | i'm miss world | Thu Dec 14 1995 16:04 | 7 | |
| 418.8 | Basis stepped to FMV at time of death | PX64::HO | Like money in the bank | Mon Dec 18 1995 16:19 | 6 |
| 418.9 | capital gain for S stocks ? | LEDER2::CHENG | Sat Mar 22 1997 11:00 | 20 | |
I sold all 13 shares of those 5/87 bonus stock in 1996. I am now trying
to figure what capital gain is. I have the 1987 1099-R form from
ESOP which has the following entries :
Box 1 : Amount includible as income (add boxse 2 &3)
Box 2 : Capital Gain : no entries
Box 3 : Ordinary income 801.27
Box 6 : Net unrealized appreciation in employer's securities
1383.20
Does this mean that the per shar stock cost is 1383.20 / 13
= 106.4 per share.
But Digital had already include 801.27 out of the 1383.20 as
Ordinary income for that year. I should report 1383.2 - 801.27
= 575.93 as my capitall gain for 1996. Am I right ?
Thanks
| |||||
| 418.10 | Isn't the cost basis on the statement of ownership? | UNXA::ZASLAW | Steve Zaslaw | Mon Mar 24 1997 11:41 | 12 |
A few weeks ago I sold the shares from 05/12/87 listed under "surrendered" on the stock ownership statement. Because there is an entry ($58.260) in the Cost/Basis column of my stock ownership statement, I figured that would be the basis for my loss when tax time comes again a year from now. I believe these stocks were given to us over a few years. I have a paper at home that summarizes the situation when the plan ended and we had to make a choice about what to do with the shares. I will see if it has anything to say that might help you in the unlikely event some wizard doesn't give you the answer shorty. | |||||
| 418.11 | who paid for those s-stocks ? | LEDER2::CHENG | Mon Mar 24 1997 16:13 | 5 | |
My stock ownership statement does not have a cosst/base for these
stocks. Did I pay for these stocks out of my ESPP money ? or did
Digital give them to me free ? If I paid $58.26 then I can take a
capital loss. If the company gave them to me, I then have a cap gain.
| |||||
| 418.12 | PCBUOA::KRATZ | Mon Mar 24 1997 16:32 | 4 | ||
Assuming these are the ESOP shares from the mid-late 80's, they were
freebies... i.e. your cost basis is 0.
.02 K
| |||||
| 418.13 | Was ESOP added to W2 in 87? | SALEM::HUTCHINS | Tue Mar 25 1997 06:26 | 5 | |
I sold my ESOP shares in 1995. The cost basis was 56.** because I had
to claim the 56.**/share on my 1987 tax return as income. I'm not sure
if this applies to you, but I think they added it to my W2 in 87.
Pete
| |||||
| 418.14 | My ESOP Shares went to an IRA | POWDML::HUSTON | Jeff Huston | Tue Mar 25 1997 08:58 | 8 |
You may want look up the actual documents. It may have been a one time
event, but was able to move my shares into an IRA at Merril Lynch. At
some point (when it was too late) I sold the shares and transfered the
results into another IRA account.
Regards,
Jeff
| |||||
| 418.15 | Your cost basis for cap gain/loss in $61.6362/share | UNXA::ZASLAW | Steve Zaslaw | Tue Mar 25 1997 10:28 | 73 |
> <<< Note 418.9 by LEDER2::CHENG >>> > -< capital gain for S stocks ? >- > > I sold all 13 shares of those 5/87 bonus stock in 1996. I am now trying > to figure what capital gain is. I have the 1987 1099-R form from > ESOP which has the following entries : > > Box 1 : Amount includible as income (add boxse 2 &3) > Box 2 : Capital Gain : no entries > Box 3 : Ordinary income 801.27 > Box 6 : Net unrealized appreciation in employer's securities > 1383.20 Usual disclaimer: Don't blame me if the following is totally wrong. I beleive it is correct. I believe your cost basis is $801.27/13=$61.6362/share. This is close to the $58.something listed as my cost basis on my Investor Services statement. Each of us will probably have a different cost basis depending on our salaries and how long we were in this ESOP program. [Gratitous editorial: The "net unrealized appreciation" quoted above is irrelevant today, IMO, and only serves to remind us how lousy an investment holding DEC stock has been, at least since 1987.] If, in 1996, you sold the shares for less than $61.6362, you have a long-term capital loss. Otherwise, a wash or a gain. This is what you must report on your 1996 return, IMO. I don't believe you need to read the following explanation since we now know what you need to do on your 1996 return. However, here's the explanation if you want it. I have all the relevant papers in hand (except the 1099R form that DIGITAL, then Digital, issued in January 1988, which reflected the "Payroll Amount Credited". I didn't look for it because I don't think I personally neeed it now because of the cost basis listed on my IS statement.). History: We were given, gratis, a small number of shares of DEC stock based on salary and stock FMV in each year 1983 to 1987. For example, in 1983, you might have received 1.9834 shares, and so on each year so that when the program terminated after 1987 you might have something like 13.1934 shares. In 1987, a change in tax law caused the company to end the program and give us three choices of what to do with the stock: 1. Hold onto the shares in a shareholder account with Investor Services; 2. Rollover the shares and/or fractional check into an IRA; 3: Sell your shares through Investor Services. The case being questioned is 1. (Why IS has a cost basis listed on my statement and not yours is a mystery to me.) In this case your whole shares were placed into your existing or new stock account on 12 May 1987. You received a check for fractional shares. That check is not relevant to the current calculations. You owed taxes on a portion of the value of your stock even though you had not yet sold it. The portion of the value on which you owed taxes is the value of the shares on the original date on which they were deposited into your account. This amount was shown in the column labelled "Payroll Amount Credited" in a statement that was issued as of 01-21-87. When you sold your shares, you became subject to tax FOR THE DIFFERENCE between the share price you receive for your stock and the "Payroll Amount Credited" amount on the statement. The "Payroll Amount Credited" is the same as on the 1099R form, which you have, so you don't need the statements. I've checked this out, and it works: If I divide the total "Payroll Amount Credited" by the number of whole shares issued to me, I get the exact same number as is listed as my cost basis on my latest IS statement of ownership. "Please remember, however, to consult a professional if you have tax-related questions." [IMHO, in this case, there's no need since that'd cost more than this whole deal is worth.] | |||||