Title: | Ask the Storage Architecture Group |
Notice: | Check out our web page at http://www-starch.shr.dec.com |
Moderator: | SSAG::TERZA N |
Created: | Wed Oct 15 1986 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 6756 |
Total number of notes: | 25276 |
Are there any performance metrics on how much degradation occurs when a member of a SA450 RAIDset fails? Related...are there guidelines on how long the recovery from a hot swap drive back to a replaced/repair RAIDset member takes? I understand one can "adjust" the rebuild speeds, trading off levels of performance in doing so. Is there more information like a white paper on this? Thanks, Steve
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6728.1 | No easy answer because of the parameters | SSDEVO::RMCLEAN | Thu May 29 1997 11:16 | 11 | |
The performance definately is not the same but it is VERY dependent upon the location of the data, the chunk size and the size of the raidset. If you have a 14 member raidset and you are only doing reads then only reads to the missing member will be slow. The others will be at full speed. Writes have a different characteristic in that the speed should be faster when the missing member is the parity member otherwise the writes should take about the same amount of time. As for the rebuild speeds I would recommend leaving it at the default unless you have a good reason to change it I.E. you are doing nothing else on the system and desire to get the rebuild done quicker. |