T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
6691.1 | by the firmware... | SUBSYS::VIDIOT::PATENAUDE | Ask your boss for ARRAY's... | Thu May 15 1997 12:00 | 6 |
| The product name in the inquiry string for both devices IS RZ28M and/or RZ26N
The only indicator is the FIRMWARE. New drives run 1xxx and up, Original drives
use 466/568/616 or 744.
roger.
|
6691.2 | Thanks for the quick answer - Colin S. | SEDSWS::SIAREY | | Thu May 15 1997 12:30 | 1 |
|
|
6691.3 | What is a RZ28W | SEDSWS::SIAREY | | Thu May 22 1997 06:10 | 12 |
| Roger,
I have another quick question. In the RZ2x firmware directory there is
a firmware file for RZ28W, is this a different device to the RZ28 and
if so does the 'Product Identification:' say RZ28 or RZ28W?
If it says RZ28, can we tell the difference by using the 'Support for
16 Bit Transfers:' information?
Many thanks,
Colin S.
|
6691.4 | good point... | SUBSYS::VIDIOT::PATENAUDE | Ask your boss for ARRAY's... | Thu May 22 1997 11:53 | 10 |
|
re-1
The file you are refering to should actually read rz28-w and yes it is a wide
version of the original rz28 (i'll change it). And yes, if the drive reports
back that is supports 16 bit transfers, then that drive is considered wide.
However, in this particular drive family the firmware file is NOT the same
between narrow and wide drives so refer to the matrix.
roger.
|
6691.5 | RZ28 + 16bit = RZ28-W | SEDSWS::SIAREY | | Thu May 22 1997 12:09 | 18 |
| Roger,
Thanks for the quick reply.
Just to clarify, if under 'scu show device' the drive reports itself as
a RZ28 AND it has support for 16 bit transfers (set to 1), then we
should be loading the 442E code. Does this version of the RZ28 have the
same issues with electronic modules ie. P4/P5 etc.
I am writing a ultrix script to automatically interigate the attached
drives, assess if a code update is required and then offer the RIGHT
code to be downloaded, hence I need to understand how each device
reports itself and how to distinquish between the various flavours.
Many thanks for your help,
Best regards,
Colin S.
|
6691.6 | | SUBSYS::VIDIOT::PATENAUDE | Ask your boss for ARRAY's... | Thu May 22 1997 13:16 | 14 |
| >
> Just to clarify, if under 'scu show device' the drive reports itself as
> a RZ28 AND it has support for 16 bit transfers (set to 1), then we
> should be loading the 442E code.
Correct!
Mostly ;^) 442E was and is the only code ever released to the wide RZ28 so there
no need to reload it over itself.
> Does this version of the RZ28 have the
> same issues with electronic modules ie. P4/P5 etc.
Nope. Only 1 version exists...
|
6691.7 | Thanks again for you help Colin S. | SEDSWS::SIAREY | | Fri May 23 1997 10:30 | 1 |
|
|