Title: | Ask the Storage Architecture Group |
Notice: | Check out our web page at http://www-starch.shr.dec.com |
Moderator: | SSAG::TERZA N |
Created: | Wed Oct 15 1986 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 6756 |
Total number of notes: | 25276 |
Hello, I would like your opinions/recommendations on the following hardware disk configuration. I have a customer with several standalone 4700s' running VMS 6.2. They have an Informix database on a mixture of rz26s' and rz28s'in a SW 800 storageworks cab. They are running DSSI via HSD5s' and 10s'. They have stripesets all on one shelf volumeshadowed to a set of disks on the next shelf etc.. this configuration works but they are looking for a better way to do it. The major concern is data availability not so much performance but performance will become an issue in the future as the database grows. The system disk is also in the sw 800 shadowed. ******************************************************************* I would like to see them go to multiple KZPSAs' (two or four configured for redundancy) with dual redundant HSZ50s' using rz28s' or rz29s'. I would suggest that stripesets be created vertically across the shelves then the stripesets be mirrored and the devices accessed that way without being volumeshadowed. I would also recommend that spareset disks be used to take care of any stripe failures. Cable the KZPSAs' so that each shelf is accessed by both controllers then configure the HSZs' with preferred IDs' for better i/o tranfer. If there are too many gotchas in this configuration I could still recommend using Volume shadowing, but across the shelves vertically and create either mirrored stripesets or volume sets mirrored which ever would be prone to the best i/o As you my gather I am not all that up on all the pros and cons of Volumeshadowing, but I have configured HSZs' in somewhat of the config I have just described. Any suggestions or info on what I can and can't do or any questions I can answer or recommendatiosn would really be appreciated. I will be monitoring this notes file daily. Thanks in advance Dennis
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6568.1 | OTOOA::LAVIGNE | Thu Apr 10 1997 16:20 | 12 | ||
If you are staying in the VAX world with 4700's you have two choices, DSSI with HSD50's and I would recommend using at least 4 DSSI rails for performance (depending on capacity), or CI. Actually forget CI because 4700's don't support it. If you are moving to Alpha and you do not need clustering then you could move to dual redundant Raid 450's. Get in touch with your Storage Specialist and they should be able to help you out. Regards, JP Lavigne |