Title: | Ask the Storage Architecture Group |
Notice: | Check out our web page at http://www-starch.shr.dec.com |
Moderator: | SSAG::TERZA N |
Created: | Wed Oct 15 1986 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 6756 |
Total number of notes: | 25276 |
I have a client who would like to install 2 x kzpsc's in his AS8400 but put the disks in a SW800 standing next to the system. He has been offered the following two solutions. 1. Each of the six (3 on each KZPSC) scsi busses has a DWZZB-AB connected (Standing on the floor) and on the other end of the BN21K a DWZZB-VW (With a loss of 6 x 1 SABB slot) 2. Move the DWLPB to the bottom of the SW800 cabinet with the help of a 17-03085-03 3.80m HOSE cable. With regard to solution 1, I have asked the client not to consider this for the reasons stated. With regards to solution 2, will there be a problem with timimg of the Hose cable? though technically speaking it should work, is it supported? (My client does not want the expense of purchasing an Expansion cabinet for the AS8400) What alternative does he have. He currently has an HSZ40 and has been led to believe that this is a dead horse and the KZPSC's will perform well in comparison. (OS is OpenVMS) Any comments? Regards Ivan
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6481.1 | OTOOA::LAVIGNE | Mon Mar 17 1997 16:04 | 7 | ||
Why on earth would he think the HSZ40 is a dead horse. If he want's the latest and greatest just upgrade the 40 to a 50. Personally I wouldn't use the DWZZB's but that me. Regards, JP Lavigne | |||||
6481.2 | OTOOA::LAVIGNE | Mon Mar 17 1997 16:06 | 4 | ||
Come to think of it why wouldn't you put the storage shelfs in the 8400. If you aren't using too many drives you could split the shelfs. JP | |||||
6481.3 | Restricted by DWLMA XMI | JOBURG::HARRIS | Tue Mar 18 1997 04:49 | 16 | |
Hello JP RE: Why on earth would he think the HSZ40 is a dead horse. Tell me more, I would like to see some io performance of the KZPSC. I found the HSZ40 and HSZ50 comparisons. Personally I like the Option of having the HS controller redundancy, P/S redundancy, ETC. And maybe soon the ability to have the two (Redundant HSZ) Controllers connected to Different SCSI FWD controllers. As far as using the System Space for BA356's in BA66x's...Unfortunately this system also has an XMI bus with the DWLMA in the sys cab. Later as the DSSI's are removed, this will dissapear Any Pointer to KZPSC performance will be appreciated. Regards Ivan |