Title: | Ask the Storage Architecture Group |
Notice: | Check out our web page at http://www-starch.shr.dec.com |
Moderator: | SSAG::TERZA N |
Created: | Wed Oct 15 1986 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 6756 |
Total number of notes: | 25276 |
I have 2 pairs of dual-redundant HSD30's with write-back cache enabled. I have been told that you cannot have write-back cache on only one of a redundant pair. What happens if the batteries fail on one HSD30? Can you leave the write-back cache enabled on just one? Thanks Andy Leslie
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6374.1 | SSDEVO::KOWALL | StorageWorks Engineering Support | Wed Feb 05 1997 10:36 | 21 | |
-< Dual HSD30's with write-back cache, battery fail query >- Yes, if the drives must failover to continue running, (sets) you will still have write back as long as one cache module has good batteries. The drives that stay on the controller with the bad cache batteries will do write-through. Please read 5.1 in the Service Manual to fully understand low battery consideration with the different cache policies. JK I have 2 pairs of dual-redundant HSD30's with write-back cache enabled. I have been told that you cannot have write-back cache on only one of a redundant pair. What happens if the batteries fail on one HSD30? Can you leave the write-back cache enabled on just one? Thanks Andy Leslie | |||||
6374.2 | SSDEVO::THOMPSON | Paul Thompson, Colorado Springs | Wed Mar 26 1997 15:07 | 5 | |
Just a clarification to -.1. When the batteries fail and the controller defaults to write-through mode, access to RAID and Mirror sets is denied because functional write back cache is a requirement to addres the "hole" issue in RAID and mirroring. |