[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference ssag::ask_ssag

Title:Ask the Storage Architecture Group
Notice:Check out our web page at http://www-starch.shr.dec.com
Moderator:SSAG::TERZAN
Created:Wed Oct 15 1986
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:6756
Total number of notes:25276

5501.0. "Alphaserver 2100 + KFESA INVALID BUFFER NAME" by GIDDAY::FLAWN () Tue Apr 09 1996 04:04

T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
5501.1Looks Like I Have Flawn SyndromeDABEAN::REEDThu Feb 06 1997 17:0216
    I'm going out on a similar call tomorrow evening. My customer is
    getting similar errors on both 2100RM's in a DSSI cluster. The
    cluster communicator in this case is the EISA to DSSI adaptor,
    a KFESA on one system and a KFESB on the other. I'm wondering if
    this problem was ever solved. Larry Gamble is helping me dig up
    data on this problem. Tomorrow evening's scheduled shutdown will be
    an info- and rev-gathering session; although I've ordered a couple of
    KFESB's to swap in, I don't expect much from changing hardware.
    
    The systems run Open VMS v6.2 (no sub-rev, just 6.2). Does anyone out
    there know (or even suspect) that a change to KFPSA's will fix this?
    Note 1208 would seem to indicate that other DSSI adapters are
    implicated. SHAC chip problem? I hope not...
    Watch this space- facts to follow.
    
    Chris Reed MCS East Providence, RI
5501.2New SYS$PADRIVER for INVALID BUFFER NAME errorsCSC32::L_GAMBLEThu Feb 13 1997 14:4838
Subj:	IPMT: Case HPAQ2052A (CFS.48698,Sev: 3,UMASS OF DARTMOUTH) has a new solution proposed by Mary Ann Sentance; Product: KFESA-AA

From:	RISSAL::LEVANGIE     13-FEB-1997 14:49:41.87
To:	PROXY::AVSRPE
CC:	LEVANGIE
Subj:	IPMT 48698 - Umass


Briefly, INVALID BUFFER NAME errors are a known issue that occur as a result 
of an incompatability (or "race condition" as mentioned in the original case 
text) in certain hardware where there is a different perception of when a 
DSSI packet has been "received" as good. If a reset occurs during this time 
(before BUS FREE), the initiator will resend the packet to the target that 
has allready accepted the packet as "good". If the resent packet is the last 
in a buffered data transfer, the retransmit attempt may not occur until after
the the target has invalidated it's buffer descriptor resulting in the error. 
This appears to happen in systems at times of heavy I/O activity.

SYS$PADRIVER has been modified (as mentioned in the case) to make these errors
less "severe" by closing the VC to the node which caused the error as opposed 
to closing the port. According to the maintainer of the driver, the modified 
version is included in the release of Alpha AXP OpenVMS V6.2-1H2. Obtaining 
the updated driver requires upgrading to that version (or above) of OpenVMS. 

There is no engineering plans to make any hardware modifications for this 
issue. In past cases, the updated SYS$PADRIVER has been proposed as the 
solution for the condition described above. Keep in mind that the updated 
SYS$PADRIVER does not eliminate the errors, it only makes them less severe.

The stars article you had mentioned in the case was a QAR and the answer was
from the maintainer of the SYS$PADRIVER. 

The proposed engineering solution is to upgrade OpenVMS to V6.2-1H2 which 
includes the updated SYS$PADRIVER that reduces the severity of the Invalid
Buffer Name errors.

 
	Dave