[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
| Title: | + OpenVMS Clusters - The best clusters in the world! + |
| Notice: | This conference is COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL. See #1.3 |
| Moderator: | PROXY::MOORE |
|
| Created: | Fri Aug 26 1988 |
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 5320 |
| Total number of notes: | 23384 |
5292.0. "DUAL REDUNDANT HSJ'S SAME CI NODE NUMBER" by IB001::JAGOMEZ (JOSE ANTONIO GOMEZ @SQO) Tue Apr 22 1997 08:29
CROSS-POSTED IN HSJ40 AND CLUSTER CONFERENCES
Hi all,
I'd like to know if this configuration could give some
problem and if it's supported:
Two HSJ's in dual redundant configuration, connected to
two different Star Couplers and with the same CI node
number in the same cluster. Of course, each host in the
cluster has two CI interfaces, each one to one S.C.
I think it's a valid configuration, but I'd like to be
sure...
Thanks in advance,
Jose A. Gomez
| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 5292.1 | Looks VAlid to me. | PROXY::MOORE | Tom Moore PK3/N85 DTN-223-6309 | Tue Apr 22 1997 14:09 | 6 |
| The ci node numbers used on one star are independant of the other star.
This means that you are able to assign the same number formatching
devices on each star. Both adapters in each system and both parts of a
dual redundant HSJ pair can have the same number. I also believe VMS
supports dual redundant pairs to be attached to two stars.
|
| 5292.2 | See 5277.* | XDELTA::HOFFMAN | Steve, OpenVMS Engineering | Tue Apr 22 1997 14:22 | 0
|