Title: | + OpenVMS Clusters - The best clusters in the world! + |
Notice: | This conference is COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL. See #1.3 |
Moderator: | PROXY::MOORE |
Created: | Fri Aug 26 1988 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 5320 |
Total number of notes: | 23384 |
Hello, I would like suggestions to a problem which I posted already in the HSD05 conference. My original question is below. A customer observes very high network load since he installed HSD10 in a cluster. I switched off lock remastering by PE1 = -1 There is a quorum disk , but not on the HSD10's. One very strange observation is that the high network load keeps happen even after replacing back the older HSD05. The network load will decrease slowly after a week it is back to normal ( as it was before using HSD10's ). Help is highly appreciated! Jens <<< SSDEVO::DISK$NOTES:[NOTES$LIBRARY]HSD05_PRODUCT.NOTE;1 >>> -< HSD05/HSD10 Product Conference >- ================================================================================ Note 234.0 HSD10 slows down the Cluster;HSD05 not 3 replies HAMSC3::JPULLER "Jens Puller MCS Hamburg " 60 lines 7-FEB-1997 10:04 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The configuration Ethern. Ethern. | | ------- VMS 5.5-2 ------- | VAX | DSSI CLUSTER | VAX | | 4000- | | 4000- | | 300 | 37 Satellites CAD & Medusa DB | 300 | | | | | ------ ------- BUS0 | | BUS 1 BUS 0 | | BUS 1 | |____________________________________________ | | | | | | | | |_____|______|_______|__________|__________________| | | | | | | | | | | ------ ------ ------ --------- --------- |RF73| |RF73| |RF73| | HSD10 | | HSD10 | ______ ______ ______ | | | | Q-disk | RZ28 | | RZ28 | | | | | | RZ28 | | RZ28 | | | | | | RZ28 | | RZ28 | | | | | | RZ28 | | RZ28 | --------- --------- this Cluster worked quite well with HSD05 installed. The Customer change to HSD10 to get the feature of the mini merge. Since there are HSD10's installed the sattelite users complain about bad performance. The network groups reports very high load on the Ethernet. They use 3COM bridges and hubs. We can consider the network as one segment for this cluster. Indead most of the traffic is SCA protocoll staff ( 6007 ) Since they run the HSD10 the network is 60% saturared. This is not when using HSD05's. Analysing the system shows a very high usage of the interrupt stack. I had to tune pool parameters to avoid system buffer shortage. Pool looks fine now but hasn't change the overall performance problem. Also the very high interruptstack utilisation is still at 60% not allways but very often during that time the network load is also very high. From observation I would say whenever the network is that much loaded the interrupt stack shows a usage of more than 80%. Any ideas are highly appriciated Jens Puller Customer Support Engineer MCS in Hamburg Germany
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5238.1 | VAXLAVC04_U2055 installed? | CSC32::S_DANNEN | Live long and slobber | Thu Feb 27 1997 10:01 | 4 |
Make sure that the customer has the VAXLAVC04_U2055 installed. This eliminates SCA "babling". steve | |||||
5238.2 | UTRTSC::thecow.uto.dec.com::JurVanDerBurg | Change mode to Panic! | Fri Feb 28 1997 03:55 | 5 | |
Setting PE1 to -1 only works if the latest locking patches for V5.5-2 are applied. V5.5-2 out of the box does not use this parameter. Jur. | |||||
5238.3 | VAXLAVC04_U2055 was already in | HAMSC3::JPULLER | Jens Puller MCS Hamburg | Fri Feb 28 1997 08:19 | 14 |
Thanks for the quick reply, VAXLAVC04_U2055 had been already installed. We know that the HSD10 is capable of twice the tranfer rate. Due to this fact we probably reach the capacity of the 10mbs of the ethernet. On the other hand the networkers of that customer reported high traffic during night ( no one is working on the workstations ). We get for a period of about 1 minute or more high load over 40% to 60% then we have again quiet time several minutes. Nearly all traffic is SCA this only if HSD10's are used. Jens | |||||
5238.4 | is VAXSHAD09_U2055 ok? | HAMSC3::JPULLER | Jens Puller MCS Hamburg | Fri Feb 28 1997 09:30 | 3 |
.-2 VAXSHAD09_U2055 was installed. Did I miss one ? |