| Title: | DEC/EDI |
| Notice: | DEC/EDI V2.1 - see note 2002 |
| Moderator: | METSYS::BABER |
| Created: | Wed Jun 06 1990 |
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 3150 |
| Total number of notes: | 13466 |
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2928.1 | KERNEL::SIMPSONR | fred | Mon Dec 09 1996 11:58 | 6 | |
| 2928.2 | METSYS::THOMPSON | Mon Dec 09 1996 14:51 | 22 | ||
| 2928.3 | KERNEL::SIMPSONR | fred | Fri Dec 13 1996 14:30 | 20 | |
| 2928.4 | No is not a valid answer | SYSTEM::HELLIAR | http://samedi.reo.dec.com/ | Fri Dec 13 1996 18:00 | 11 |
| 2928.5 | METSYS::THOMPSON | Fri Dec 13 1996 18:54 | 4 | ||
| 2928.6 | ivp checksums worthless | CX3PST::MICK::M_BEACH | Mike, USCSC | Fri Feb 14 1997 23:20 | 7 |
ivp checksums has not worked correctly, consistently, since 1.2-0. you cannot imagine how many uscsc calls we get after each and every release. same answer everytime: "please ignore any/all checksum errors produced by dec/edi's ivp. we apologize on behalf of digital." i wonder how much money this costs us. oh well, as long as it is mcs money, who cares? | |||||
| 2928.7 | METSYS::THOMPSON | Sat Feb 15 1997 14:51 | 17 | ||
Mike,
THere is a new procedure in V2.1D that helps you analyze the
results.
$ dir edieng""::user2:[decedi_v21c_patches]*.com
Directory EDIENG""::USER2:[DECEDI_V21C_PATCHES]
DECEDI$FIXUP_IVP.COM;1
60 28-JAN-1997 15:41:03.00
Total of 1 file, 60 blocks.
M
| |||||
| 2928.8 | tanks | CX3PST::MICK::M_BEACH | Mike, USCSC | Fri Feb 21 1997 19:10 | 1 |
thanks...I'll take a look | |||||