T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
5066.1 | | HOTRDB::LASTOVICA | Is it possible to be totally partial? | Mon Feb 24 1997 10:39 | 6 |
| since only a RW user can write to the snapshot files, once would have
to assume that perhaps the customer is a little confused. How about
this, the next time the users are removed from the database, truncate
all the snaps down to nothing. Then, the next day, run RMU/SHO STAT
and look at the stall messages screen. Look for any processes stalled
'writing' anything.
|
5066.2 | | HOTRDB::PMEAD | Paul, [email protected], 719-577-8032 | Mon Feb 24 1997 11:30 | 3 |
| If the areas are truly "read only" then why not set them to "READ
ONLY". Then, when their applications all blow up, they will find out
which ones are writing to those areas.
|
5066.3 | ...and the snapshots keep on growing | 10245::COBROWN | Colin from Danmark | Mon Mar 03 1997 05:15 | 20 |
| CT has been truncating snapshot files when database is taken off line
every night. Monitoring the stalls waiting for writing shows that only
two applications that are expected to do updates are in fact doing so
and their transactions are short.
Monitoring, according to the CT, does not show any long running read
transactions.
Observing the two write applications, reveals that each time they start
a new transaction they need to extend the snapshot files. It appears as
if snapshot space is never released and reused.
This problem seems to have started with version 7.0-00. A second
production system at this CT is also showing increased snapshot growth
since 7.0-00 was introduced, but it is not so extreme.
(This reply has had to be reentered, as thursdays update got lost in
the move.)
Colin
|
5066.4 | Seems there WAS an active process. | 10245::COBROWN | Colin from Danmark | Wed Mar 12 1997 10:49 | 12 |
| Just to close this the customer had a SQL/services executor hanging
arround with a prestarted transaction.
When we set the min executors to 0 and idle time out to 300 seconds the
problem mostly went away.
They still have snapshot growth on the RDB$SYSTEM and no tables in
there.
At least if I can trust them this time:-)
Colin
|
5066.5 | | HOTRDB::PMEAD | Paul, [email protected], 719-577-8032 | Wed Mar 12 1997 11:19 | 6 |
| > They still have snapshot growth on the RDB$SYSTEM and no tables in
> there.
They can disable cardinality updates if they would like (after
understanding all of the side-effects that can cause). That should
prevent snapshot growth on the system area.
|