T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
5016.1 | | NOVA::R_ANDERSON | Oracle Corporation (603) 881-1935 | Tue Feb 11 1997 09:11 | 8 |
| Well, you are comparing apples and oranges here.
I assume from your description that the local buffer case does NOT have record
cache enabled. This being probably the case, you cannot compare the I/Os
because of the completely different strategies that record caching uses for
migrating changes to disk...
Rick
|
5016.2 | okay and | UKVMS3::SHISCOCK | stand and deliver | Tue Feb 11 1997 09:24 | 11 |
|
Sure I'm comparing two different environments but it just seemed
odd that the database with GB and Row caching performs ZERO
async writes.
So are you implying that because caching uses a different write
stratergy it may or may not use async writes? Can you expand on
that further please.
thanks so far,
Steve
|
5016.3 | | NOVA::R_ANDERSON | Oracle Corporation (603) 881-1935 | Wed Feb 12 1997 10:34 | 5 |
| It's probably more likely that the record caching async write mechanism has not
yet been instrumented to record async I/Os (the RCS server does them in most
cases).
Rick
|
5016.4 | ta muchly | UKVMS3::SHISCOCK | stand and deliver | Wed Feb 12 1997 12:01 | 3 |
|
Thanks. It closed the call with that customer.
|