| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 4877.1 | | NOVA::SMITHI | Don't understate or underestimate Rdb! | Fri Jan 03 1997 12:50 | 16 |
| 4877.2 | Maybe it is the insert that is quicker? | 10245::COBROWN | Colin from Danmark | Mon Jan 06 1997 08:17 | 5 |
| 4877.3 | | ORAREP::HERON::GODFRIND | Oracle Rdb Engineering | Mon Jan 06 1997 09:48 | 12 |
| 4877.4 | | ITVMS1::GTACCHIN | Giovanni Tacchini | Thu Jan 09 1997 08:58 | 12 |
| 4877.4 | I'm back | CHSR36::LCONS | | Thu Jan 16 1997 11:43 | 31 |
| 4877.5 | Bug ? | CHSR36::LCONS | | Thu Jan 23 1997 05:29 | 3 |
| 4877.6 | | ORAREP::HERON::GODFRIND | Oracle Rdb Engineering | Sun Jan 26 1997 16:01 | 4 |
| Well, if you have a reproduceable case that clearly exhibits a problem,
then I suppose, yes, open a bug.
/albert
|
| 4877.7 | | NOVA::SMITHI | Don't understate or underestimate Rdb! | Sun Jan 26 1997 16:43 | 11 |
| ~insert into test_lc1 select * from test_lc;
~insert into test_lc1 select * from test_lc order by col1;
why not run your test with the query order reversed.
insert into test_lc1 select * from test_lc order by col1;
insert into test_lc1 select * from test_lc;
Does that make a difference?
ian
|
| 4877.8 | | CHSR36::LCONS | | Mon Jan 27 1997 05:35 | 7 |
| I've not execute the query one time.
I've ran it many times, order first, order second, and i've always the same
result.
On my station the factor is only 0.5 beetween the twoo queries.
On the customer site the factor is 16...
Louis
|
| 4877.9 | What else is different... | BOUVS::OAKEY | I'll take Clueless for $500, Alex | Mon Jan 27 1997 10:49 | 8 |
| � <<< Note 4877.8 by CHSR36::LCONS >>>
�On my station the factor is only 0.5 beetween the twoo queries.
�On the customer site the factor is 16...
Sounds like time to start figuring out what else is different between your
environment and the customer's :)
|