| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 1841.1 | | VAXCPU::michaud | Jeff Michaud - ObjectBroker | Fri Feb 21 1997 16:27 | 12 |
| > I'm moving my environment from DECnet Phase IV to DECnet-Plus. In this
> process I have to convert my Notebook entry to DECnet-Plus format, i.e.
> Notes> MODIFY ENTRY xxxx/FILE=DEC:.site-code.nodename::notes_file_name.
> I have to find site codes of all Notes file entry. Is this true?
Not true. Almost all easynet nodes have their Phase IV node
synonyms also registered in the DEC: namespace, so you don't
need to modify all your notebook entries.
I'm been using NOTES on a Phase V node for years for example,
and all my notebook entries use Phase IV nodenames (except
for the ones I connect to via TCP/IP of course).
|
| 1841.2 | Use either syntax | FUNYET::ANDERSON | Where's the nearest White Castle? | Fri Feb 21 1997 17:12 | 11 |
| You don't have to use the DECnet-Plus node name style. Using it avoids a
synonym translation the first time you access the conference, but the node name,
whether Phase IV or -Plus style, will be stored in your local CDI cache anyway.
My notebook has a mix of DEC:.site.node::conference and NODE::CONFERENCE
entries, although when adding a new conference I usually put the site code in.
You can use the FINDNODE utility (I forget where I got it from) to quickly find
the site code for any DECnet node.
Paul
|
| 1841.3 | | VAXCPU::michaud | Jeff Michaud - ObjectBroker | Fri Feb 21 1997 18:24 | 12 |
| > You can use the FINDNODE utility (I forget where I got it from) to quickly find
> the site code for any DECnet node.
And if you are on Digital UNIX using DECnet/OSI and you have
the DNAUTIL subset (if it's still named that) installed, you
can use the syntofull utililty:
vaxcpu> /usr/field/syntofull funyet vaxcpu humane rdgeng
funyet => DEC:.mro.funyet
vaxcpu => DEC:.zko.vaxcpu
humane => DEC:.mro.humane
rdgeng => DEC:.REO.RDGENG
|
| 1841.4 | namespace name in my node name was wrong | 60326::KAGEYAMA | Trust, but Verify | Sat Feb 22 1997 02:35 | 11 |
|
Thanks, Jeff and Paul.
Now it works with my Phase IV style entry.
First I got "remote node is unreachable" error message. The problem is
the DECnet full name of my node is not defined in a DEC: namespace on my
node, although I defined the DEC: namespace as my default name space.
After I changed it with DECNET$CONFIGURE.COM, eveything went fine.
- Kazunori
|