T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
234.1 | all that frustration gone in 1 round | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Thu Aug 17 1995 17:45 | 1 |
234.2 | | ERICF::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Aug 17 1995 17:46 | 4 |
|
Tyson, 1st round knockout.
George
|
234.3 | | CAMONE::WAY | Officer on deck! | Thu Aug 17 1995 18:56 | 1 |
| If McNeely lasts 95 seconds I'll be surprised.
|
234.4 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | This is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding plan | Fri Aug 18 1995 07:49 | 4 |
234.5 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Aug 18 1995 09:24 | 5 |
| One thing I've noticed about McNeely's press conferences is that he has a
unique ability to make you less sympathetic about the beating he's going to
take. This guy has raised being obnoxious to an art form.
George
|
234.6 | 3 dings and you're out! | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Fri Aug 18 1995 09:47 | 7 |
| Tyson, Round 3 TKO
I think McNeely is going to have too much heart to go down, but won't know
how to defend himself.
zamboni
|
234.7 | 1 round KO | WMOIS::BUCKLEY_M | | Fri Aug 18 1995 09:53 | 1 |
| I heard last night that the over/under for the fight is 2 rounds!
|
234.8 | Don King *loves* Peter McNeeley | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Fri Aug 18 1995 10:00 | 10 |
|
Did anyone read the Globe article yesterday(?) (might have been by Ryan)
about how perfect McNeeley is for promoting this fight. Don King was raving
(yeah, I know, he *always* raves) about how McNeeley really puts his all
into promoting a fight.
If McNeeley puts up any kind of a fight at all before being pummeled, I bet
he gets a couple of future favors from King in terms of fights/prize money.
King's a blowhard but he's not stupid - he knows McNeeley's act is putting
money in his pocket, and he actually appears to be grateful.
|
234.9 | Could McNeeley be the next Buster Douglas? | WMOIS::BUCKLEY_M | | Fri Aug 18 1995 10:05 | 5 |
| Regardless if McNeeley wins or loses, he is known all around the
boxing world . . . I never heard of him until he accepted the
challenge from Tyson. McNeely has b*lls for stepping in the ring
with Tyson.
|
234.10 | | CAMONE::WAY | Officer on deck! | Fri Aug 18 1995 10:20 | 20 |
| >
> One thing I've noticed about McNeely's press conferences is that he has a
>unique ability to make you less sympathetic about the beating he's going to
>take. This guy has raised being obnoxious to an art form.
George, that's one thing that you and I *do* agree on....
This guy spouted a poem yesterday at the weigh-in, sort of quasi Ali-like,
albeit a poor imitation.
He WROTE IT DOWN AND READ IT.
At least Ali gave you the feeling it was extemporaneous....
McNeely lasts less than 95 seconds for his big payday....
'Saw
|
234.11 | fer grins | HBAHBA::HAAS | x,y,z,time,matter,energy | Fri Aug 18 1995 10:47 | 13 |
| Main, I don't know what you guys were expecting but I think McNeeley's a
hoot.
So, he's not a_Ali. It would be blasphemous to compare their boxing
prowess and it's apparent he aint got the quip of the Lip.
Reading the freakin bad poem makes it even funnier.
And did you catch the posing? Classic WWF!
It's Friday and we can all use a laugh.
TTom
|
234.12 | $$$ Talks, Brown Stuff Walks... | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Fri Aug 18 1995 10:49 | 12 |
| >King's a blowhard but he's not stupid - he knows McNeeley's act is putting
>money in his pocket, and he actually appears to be grateful.
Well he's not that grateful.
He's only paying McNeely $700k while Iron Mike is walking away with
at least $25m. You'd think the least King could do would throw another 300k
at McNeely to make it a nice round figure. Without McNeely's posturing, the
pre-fight hype woulda been as boring as the fight is likely to be....
zamboni
|
234.13 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Fri Aug 18 1995 10:55 | 13 |
| > He's only paying McNeely $700k while Iron Mike is walking away with
>at least $25m. You'd think the least King could do would throw another 300k
>at McNeely to make it a nice round figure. Without McNeely's posturing, the
>pre-fight hype woulda been as boring as the fight is likely to be....
My point is that King didn't necessarily know what he had on his hands
beforehand, so maybe McNeeley isn't getting what he's worth to King *right
away*, but I wouldn't be surprised to see him get some breaks further on down
the line to "make up" for it.
Even though it won't be a long fight, I don't think it'll be boring. McNeeley
is a self-proclaimed "brawler", not a boxer. Tyson's not going to have to go
looking for him...
|
234.14 | I'd put down $10 or $20 on McNeeley if I could | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Fri Aug 18 1995 11:12 | 13 |
| Roland,
There's a book out detailing the "Life and Crimes of Don King".
The Herald talked about it this week. King is one of those people who
live for cheating others.
Getting the 680k itself is far more the question than ever getting
anything else.
As for the fight, class usually tells in these things but since
there's an unkown factor, getting down on McNeeley at 18:1 wouldn't be
so bad. Think of all the revenue the state could get by allowing
betting on this one - they could have it done in no time - what
political element is keeping this simple process from happeining?
|
234.15 | A Glimmer of Hope.. | STOWOA::CIPOLLA | | Fri Aug 18 1995 11:16 | 6 |
| Not to play Devils Advocate but I was thinking last night about another
boxer who had a terrible reputation as well. James 'Buster' Douglas
was basically a washed up, no name as well--and he beat Tyson when he
was in his prime. Does anyone know how Busters record compares with
McNeeley's? Maybe he has a small, tiny chance (of making it to one of
the later rounds in the fight).
|
234.16 | | CSC32::MACGREGOR | Colorado: the TRUE mid-west | Fri Aug 18 1995 11:57 | 6 |
|
Hmm, $700k versus $25m, that's a 35 to 1 ratio, which is about the odds
given for the fight right 8^)
Marc
|
234.17 | good and better | HBAHBA::HAAS | x,y,z,time,matter,energy | Fri Aug 18 1995 12:05 | 10 |
| I'm sure McNeeley is feeling good about both the money and the noteriety.
I'm sure the 600-700K is about 35 times the mostest he's made in any of
his previous fights.
And he may have started a career with his 15 minutes of fame.
He could follow Jake LaMotta into the ex-boxer turned standup routine.
TTom
|
234.18 | | CAMONE::WAY | Officer on deck! | Fri Aug 18 1995 12:26 | 11 |
| >And he may have started a career with his 15 minutes of fame.
>
>He could follow Jake LaMotta into the ex-boxer turned standup routine.
One of the guys on WFAN yesterday was saying that he was browsing on the
computer, and was about to punch up (no pun intended) McNeely's record, and
then figured "why bother?"
I guess McNeely has fought his share of tomato cans too....
|
234.19 | NOW will be there | HBAHBA::HAAS | x,y,z,time,matter,energy | Fri Aug 18 1995 15:08 | 10 |
| Wail, it had to happen.
Shore 'nuff, them wommin are gonna protest this fight.
Supposedly, the Nevada branch of NOW will go to MGM Grand Saturday and
demononstrate against this travesty.
They're not too happy about Tyson's history of abusing women, either.
TTom
|
234.20 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Fri Aug 18 1995 15:21 | 1 |
234.21 | Let the man prove himself first. | STOWOA::CIPOLLA | | Fri Aug 18 1995 16:21 | 8 |
| I am afraid that I must agree. Although Tyson's abusive attitude
toward women in the past was terrible, he was caught, convicted and
served his time. ie.He paid his debt. He hasn't done anything abusive
toward women since he got out of jail has he? No. Leave him alone I
say. Hopefully he learned his lesson and won't continue the same type
of behavior. If he is foolish to try the same thing again, he will go
to jail again. Until then he is an innocent man. Maybe these women
should beat up on themselves.
|
234.22 | | CAMONE::WAY | Officer on deck! | Fri Aug 18 1995 17:35 | 5 |
| > Maybe these women
> should beat up on themselves.
Where do you buy tickets for that event? 8^)
|
234.23 | | AKEEM::GRONOWSKI | This is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding plan | Fri Aug 18 1995 17:55 | 3 |
|
I know one this, Heiser wouldn't last 15 seconds with Jake. Not that
Jake is a monster, but Heiser is a *wuss*!
|
234.24 | what a meanie | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Fri Aug 18 1995 18:13 | 1 |
234.25 | McNeely......yeah right! | FABSIX::E_MAXWELL | Oh flight attendent! | Mon Aug 21 1995 02:50 | 7 |
| Re .3> 95 seconds..
Nice guess......actual time was 89 seconds.
The Medfield Hurricane knocked down twice before being D-Q'd
for having his trainer enter the ring.
Lil Ed
|
234.26 | Tyson--future. | STOWOA::CIPOLLA | | Mon Aug 21 1995 08:53 | 6 |
| After the defeat of McNeeley, where does Tyson go now? Is he going to
continue to 'sharpen' his already razor sharp skills, or does he move
on to a Lennox Lewis, Michael Moorer, etc. fighter? Has he said
anything? I guess everyone knows what McNeeley will move on to.
GC
|
234.27 | | CAMONE::WAY | Officer on deck! | Mon Aug 21 1995 09:37 | 23 |
| My girlfriend and I were watching the late news Saturday night and they
gave a teaser on the results ("Tysons-McNeely results after this commercial")
I said to her "I'll bet that stiff from Medfah didn't last 95 seconds, that's
what I told the folks in Sports"
Sure enough, 1:29-something....
On Sunday, on ESPN I saw a couple of quick highlight clips -- McNeely looked
more battered in 1:29 that I've seen a lot of fighters look in 12 full rounds.
Well, where does Tyson go? He's got to fight someone decent next time, no
Tomato Can, otherwise folks (like me) are gonna think its all just a big
setup.....
Too bad I didn't "predict" last Friday's $21 million dollar Lotto with such
accuracy....
'Saw
|
234.28 | Bowe, Holyfield, McCall, Moorer or Foreman - that's it | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | How can people live in Florida? | Mon Aug 21 1995 10:59 | 9 |
| How's the beautiful Kim doin' 'Saw? Tell her I was axing about her.
As for Tyson, who in their right mind would pay $40 or $50 for that
fiasco Saturday night? But more to the point, who would pay to see him
fight again? I can see some curiosity aroused for Tyson's first fight
back, but unless he really steps up in class (please no Bruce Seldon!),
I can't imagine many suckers wanting to go the PPV route again.
NAZZ
|
234.29 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pick 'em up and strut | Mon Aug 21 1995 11:12 | 10 |
| > How's the beautiful Kim doin' 'Saw? Tell her I was axing about her.
Very well.
> As for Tyson, who in their right mind would pay $40 or $50 for that
Some looney in my complex did. I couldn't see it.
Hell, the 15 or so seconds of highlights I saw on the news for free was enough.
|
234.30 | Tank job? | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Steve Sherman @MFR DTN 865-2944 | Mon Aug 21 1995 11:15 | 7 |
| So far, all I know about this "fight" is what I read on CNN Teletext and
in here. Why did the trainer jump into the ring? Was his fighter in
that much trouble? Is it true the Commission is holding up the purse?
And how did Tyson look?
Steve
|
234.31 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Where is the grass greener? | Mon Aug 21 1995 11:27 | 8 |
|
Bruce Seldon is the current holder of the WBA heavy weight belt.
Tyson getting a belt might be the only way he can maximize his money
potential in the short term.
The Nevada Boxing Commission is withholding McNeeley's trainers
fee. They are investigating why in jumped in the rink.
Ron
|
234.32 | glad I missed this one | HBAHBA::HAAS | x,y,z,time,matter,energy | Mon Aug 21 1995 11:48 | 16 |
| Seldon fought on the undercard and by some accounts was the bestest
looking fighter of the night.
Earlier, Terry Norris won some kinda title from a guy he had already
beaten twice. Problem was that in both cases he knocked the guy out after
the round ended. Norris completely creamed the guy and ended it in about
5 minutes.
Meanwhile, I think was all should give pause and be thankful that
McNeeley wasn't killed and this fiasco is over. The trainer saw the
result and I guess he figgered that he might as well jump in. A towel
woulda been sufficient but I guess he wanted his 15 minutes of fame, too.
In holding is the 175K that he stands to get if'n he can convince the
commission that he was being merciful and not because he was paid off.
TTom
|
234.33 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pick 'em up and strut | Mon Aug 21 1995 12:15 | 10 |
| I didn't see the fight, but as I said, I saw some highlights on the news.
I don't know at what point in the 89 seconds the highlights were from,
but McNeely's face looks wicked swollen. He must've just waded in with his
hands down. Unreal.
I can sorta see why it was stopped.
'Saw
|
234.34 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Where is the grass greener? | Mon Aug 21 1995 14:39 | 10 |
|
Saw,
McNeeley decided to go head to head with Tyson. No Jabbing
or clutching. So Mike just teed off on him. Lets face it Mike has been
lifting weights in prison for 3 years. He is probably stronger now then
he was before. He just has to work on his timing/rythem and boxing
instincts.
Ron
|
234.35 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pick 'em up and strut | Mon Aug 21 1995 15:03 | 6 |
| Oh, no doubt Tyson was in shape for this fight.
But I've never seen a fighter look as bad as McNeely did as early....
'Saw
|
234.36 | Michael Spinks? | HBAHBA::HAAS | x,y,z,time,matter,energy | Mon Aug 21 1995 15:08 | 7 |
| Can you say Michael Spinks?
At least McNeeley went into the middle of the ring to at least attempt to
mix it up. Shore it was stupid but so was getting into the ring in the
firsted place.
TTom
|
234.37 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Rocky Mountain Ichthyologist | Mon Aug 21 1995 15:09 | 5 |
|
I heard one announcer say thst this is the first fight he saw Tyson win
as a counter puncher. I guess McNelly rushed him at the start and
immediatly went down from a right cross.
|
234.38 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Mon Aug 21 1995 17:09 | 7 |
234.39 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill! | Tue Aug 22 1995 11:37 | 14 |
|
>> Bruce Seldon is the current holder of the WBA heavy weight belt.
>> Tyson getting a belt might be the only way he can maximize his money
>> potential in the short term.
Tyson don't need no steenkin' belts. He's got the best title of all
as far as boxing is concerned - he's MIKE TYSON. Fresh out of prison
his first fight does more than a million homes at an average of $41
per. And the way the fight went will only whet the public's appetite
for more. If anything Mike Tyson is the one guy who can take an eraser
to the alphabet boys and clean up the mish-mash of sanctioning orgs
by not accepting any title belts.
|
234.40 | Does boxing have the right idea? | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Tue Aug 22 1995 12:01 | 7 |
| Just out of curiousity how did the gate and ppv plus cable replay
combined compare say to the average hockey team (Winnipeg fe.) in
revenue?
I think this is what Michael Jordan is essentially getting at: doing
away with 90% of the nba and just having the megastars doing
championships; norman of the pga tried something similar.
|
234.41 | Next Move | STOWOA::CIPOLLA | | Tue Aug 22 1995 12:27 | 3 |
| Tommorow Don King is supposed to reveal the next person that Tyson will
destroy. Personally I am waiting for Bowe to fight him. However, I
don't think that will happen for a while.
|
234.42 | | WMOIS::BUCKLEY_M | | Tue Aug 22 1995 12:34 | 3 |
| I would like to see Tyson fight Axel Schultz of Germany. Schultz
lost to Foreman by decision although I thought Schultz looked
impressive and won the fight.
|
234.43 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pick 'em up and strut | Tue Aug 22 1995 12:48 | 18 |
| There was some talk on the radio last night about Tyson having lifted a lot
of weight in prison. The guy was saying that weight-lifting muscles don't
translate into boxing muscles, and that Tyson had mentioned that he had
some "ring doubts" during his training.
You've got to know that Tyson wished that fight had lasted longer. I would
have were I Mike Tyson.
One can only wonder how much King's manipulation of the strings to maintain
power and control (in the boxing world, not just of Tyson) will hurt Tyson
in the long run.
I'm not convinced yet that Tyson will destroy anyone and everyone. There's not
many out there who could beat him, but I'd like to see him in a more
challenging test than Peter "Call me Mr. Tomato" McNeely.....
'saw
|
234.44 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Where is the grass greener? | Tue Aug 22 1995 13:01 | 10 |
|
George Foreman's promoter Bob Arum. Has sent Don King a proposal
for a Foreman/Tyson fight on Nov. 4th. Arum is trying to convince
King that with Holyfield/Bowe already being held on Nov. 4th. He
needs a big name in order for a Tyson/? to work on Nov. 4th. Who
are you going to watch Holyfield/Bowe? Or Tyson/stiff? After the
McNeely fight they won't get anything from PPV. So the money wouldn't
be there.
Ron
|
234.45 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill! | Tue Aug 22 1995 13:12 | 20 |
|
>> Who are you going to watch Holyfield/Bowe? Or Tyson/stiff? After the
>> McNeely fight they won't get anything from PPV. So the money wouldn't
>> be there.
HBO and Rock Newman live in fear that King will dog them by constantly
scheduling Tyson opposite Bowe/HBO fights. Tyson vs. Anybody would out-
draw Holyfield vs. Bowe III hands down. Neither Bowe nor Holyfield has
the aura that Tyson has - not even close. If either of those two went
away for three years and came back the interest would be minimal at best.
Tyson went away for three years and returns as the biggest draw in
boxing if not all of sport. In boxing the heavyweights are king and
Mike is the king of the heavies even though at this point Bowe is the
much better fighter and would clean Tyson's clock if the two were to
meet within the next year and Bowe came in in the right frame of mind.
As for Foreman, he had his window of opportunity and unfortunately it
closed before Mike got back in the ring. After effectively getting
beaten by a nobody named Axel Schultz, George has seen his box office
appeal plummet. Does anybody really want to see Mike beat the hell out
of old, fat and slow George? I really hope not.
|
234.46 | unfortuntely the list of worthwile challengers is short | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Tue Aug 22 1995 13:20 | 5 |
|
Tyson vs. Lewis or Morer would be fun. The only guy out there really
worth the PPV is Roy Jones..........
mike
|
234.47 | Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | How can people live in Florida? | Tue Aug 22 1995 14:38 | 12 |
| Tyson vs another Tomato Can will draw squat vs Bowe-Holyfield. There
was a large portion of the buying public that was curious to see Tyson
again after his absence, and McNeely did a very good job of hyping the
fight (nuch better than he had any chancc of doing in the ring). But
the way the fight turned out will not lead itself to attract those
curiosity seekers again, and the true boxing fan will definitely choose
Bowe Holyfield unless Tyson comes up with a legitimate opponent. I
would say only Oliver McCall and Michael Moorer would fall into that
category, beside Bowe and Holyfield. If King opts to match Tyson
against Tomato Can #2, he won't even draw flies.
NAZZ
|
234.48 | maybe bowe | BSS::MENDEZ | | Tue Aug 22 1995 14:40 | 10 |
| Tommy
I was talking to some fight fans here in Co Springs and there all big
on Tyson. Nobody could touch him and all that trash. However if
there is anybody who can beat Tyson it would be Bowe. He's got size,
reach, movement, good jab, AND unlike the rest of the heavies will
slip punches. If Bowe trains and gets his head together he could beat
Tyson... Anyway boxing has lost most of its appeal for me... It seems
to be mostly show and not much action. I don't think its fake but it
sure looks alot like WWF...
|
234.49 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill! | Tue Aug 22 1995 16:03 | 36 |
|
>> Tyson vs another Tomato Can will draw squat vs Bowe-Holyfield. There
>> was a large portion of the buying public that was curious to see Tyson
>> again after his absence, and McNeely did a very good job of hyping the
>> fight (nuch better than he had any chancc of doing in the ring). But
>> the way the fight turned out will not lead itself to attract those
>> curiosity seekers again, and the true boxing fan will definitely choose
>> Bowe Holyfield unless Tyson comes up with a legitimate opponent. I
>> would say only Oliver McCall and Michael Moorer would fall into that
>> category, beside Bowe and Holyfield. If King opts to match Tyson
>> against Tomato Can #2, he won't even draw flies.
I obviously don't agree with this at all. As despicable as Mike Tyson's
crime was to me, as a boxing fan (like thousands of other boxing fans)
the heavyweight scene is very interesting again and Mike Tyson is the
reason why. That holds doubly true for casual fans. That Mike Tyson
looked like the vintage Mike Tyson is a detriment? I ain't buying.
Millions upon millions of people were curious enough to cough up
the PPV dough to see whta Tyson would do and now their curiousity
is sated because Tyson rolled over McNeeley like a dump truck over
a chipmunk? And let's talk about Bowe vs. The Pipsqueak III. That's
more intriguing than the next Tyson fight against a better fighter
than McNeeley? More people care to see if Bowe can push himself away
from the dinner table often enough to beat a pipsqueak with a bad
ticker, who has been away from the game himself, than care if the
magic is really back with Mike Tyson? Again, I ain't buying. Bowe
is probably the best heavy out there right now but he has all the
charisma of a bowl of cold oatmeal. And Holyfield has the heart of
a warrior but he too is more bland than a very bland thing and was
always too small to be a true heavy. The next Tyson match won't do
the same amount of business as this first one but if it goes up a-
gainst Bowe vs. The Pipsqueak III - Tyson wins, referee stops contest
in the first round, HBO and Rock Newman will be forced to pick another
date.
|
234.50 | Holyfield vs. Brydie I | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Tue Aug 22 1995 16:21 | 16 |
| Tommy,
I just had this vision of you in a small room with Holyfield, calling
him "The Pipsqueak". It wasn't pretty...
"More bland than a very bland thing" has my eyes tearing up from
laughter, though...
People paid $40-45 to see Tyson fight a *nobody*. To think that
they won't pay to see him fight a semi-somebody isn't wise.
"No one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the
American people..." (apologies for any misquote)
Roland
|
234.51 | maybe it would be a *great* fight... | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Tue Aug 22 1995 16:22 | 5 |
|
Of course, I've never seen Tommy before. Maybe he could kick the
crap out of Holyfield. I'm just working on a vision of him as the
normal American male...
|
234.52 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pick 'em up and strut | Tue Aug 22 1995 16:36 | 33 |
| > Of course, I've never seen Tommy before. Maybe he could kick the
> crap out of Holyfield. I'm just working on a vision of him as the
> normal American male...
I think Tommy could give Holyfield a RUN for his money 8^)
Actually, IMO, Tommy looks like he could handle himself pretty well in the
ring, he's just not in the heavyweight class....
MHO:
It's more than just who the folks will pay for. Don King is
doing his best Jim Henson impression in the background, working and
playing the angles to get his boy the biggest payday and the biggest
draw (and the biggest cut for himself) when he finally goes after
the crown.
My guess is that if King controls a fighter now other than Tyson
who is capable of getting one of the four crowns semi-soon, Tyson
will fight that guy a year from now. The rest of Tyson's fights
will be warm ups.
I agree with Tommy -- Tyson is the most interesting thing on the
heavyweight scene since boxing started swirling down the commode
years ago. King will milk it for all its worth.
'Saw
|
234.53 | Tyson gets another shot at Buster -- Mathis that is | FABSIX::E_MAXWELL | Oh flight attendent! | Wed Aug 23 1995 04:52 | 11 |
| Tyson's next opponent will be Buster Mathis Jr. on Nov. 4 in Las
Vegas. Mathis is 20-0 but is a light hitter with only six knockouts in
his career. His biggest claim to fame came last year when his bout with
Riddick Bowe was ruled a no contest after Bowe hit him after he was
down in the fourth round. King defended Tyson's fight against McNeeley
but said he would drop pay-per-view prices for the Nov. 4 bout because
both he and Tyson feel bad about the way the fight ended with
McNeeley's manager, Vinny Vecchione, throwing in the towel. Gee, thanks
Don.
ESPNET SportsZone
|
234.54 | | STOWOA::CIPOLLA | | Wed Aug 23 1995 08:58 | 4 |
| You won't catch me even paying attention to Tyson again until he fights a big
big name fighter. On the other hand the Bowe/Holyfield fights have always
been great. I would pay $50 to watch Holyfield before I pay $5 to
watch Tyson pummel some bum for 2 rounds (or less).
|
234.55 | 'best'? | HBAHBA::HAAS | x,y,z,time,matter,energy | Wed Aug 23 1995 12:56 | 12 |
| Ya gotta like Don King!
He proclaimed Buster Mathis, Jr, the best contender out there and
declared that there is none finer.
Oh Don, how 'bout Lennox Lewis and Riddicke Bowe?
The guy that Tyson should fight, cause the money would be right is Ol'
George Foreman. Not that it'd necessarily be a good fight, but people
would pay for it.
TTom
|
234.56 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill! | Wed Aug 23 1995 13:08 | 29 |
|
>> You won't catch me even paying attention to Tyson again until he
>> fights a big big name fighter.
Er... you entered the basenote. I think that could be strongly
construed as "even paying attention".
Let's keep in mind that "boxing fans" is a fairly small group.
Big money fights like Holyfield-Foreman, Tyson-McNeeley make
their money on the huge sea of casual fans that will tune in for
only fights that they view as "events" - fights with more than
fistic excellence on dislplay because neither Foreman-Holyfield
or Tyson-McNeeley promised to be aesthetically pleasing. "Boxing
fans" made up a very small percentage of the folks who ponied up
for Tyson-McNeeley. The percentage could probably be measured
in the single digits. Just like the interest stateside in the World
Cup, the vast majority of folks who watched Tyson-McNeeley (and I
wasn't one of them) wanted to see a spectacle not a sporting event.
"Real boxing fans" aren't very interested in Bowe-Pipsqueak III
either. The first fight was exciting but the second was only close
because Bowe slacked off in his training and came in fat giving
Holyfield his only impressive victory as a heavyweight. If Bowe
trains for it, this next bout will be a blowout. It's just my
guess that there are still far more people who view the next Tyson
fight as an event than view the next Bowe-Holyfield fight that
way. As a boxing fan, I'd be infinitely more interested in watching
Roy Jones and Nigel Benn tangle than watching any two heavyweights
out there including Bowe-Tyson.
|