T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
967.1 | | IOSG::CARLIN | Dick Carlin IOSG, Reading, England | Tue Feb 04 1997 10:55 | 14 |
| Exactly which directories do they want to synch?
PMDF-X500
Digital X.500
DDS
others?
Do you have the documentation on Innosoft's synchronisation tools?
(Who are you? I have an interest in this topic)
Cheers
Dick Carlin
|
967.2 | Digital X.500 Directory Synchronizer | GOBUCS::COOLEY | Megan and Michelle's Daddy | Tue Feb 04 1997 14:47 | 8 |
| Well - there's always XDSU - see:
http://clmnte.cop.dec.com/products/xdsu.html
It is perfect for synching a bunch of heterogeneous directories via X.500.
Regards,
Warren
|
967.3 | PMDF X.500 provides some tools | 30753::WIEGLEB | Voracious schools of lottery girls | Sat Feb 08 1997 01:18 | 27 |
| I've been starting to play with PMDF X.500. Their DirSynch tools look
like they might be worthwhile, but I haven't yet been able to find
anyone in Digital who's used them in a production environment.
(The question was posted in the THEBAY::PMDF conference, but has not
received any replies as of yet. KP7 to add it to your Notebook.)
The PMDF X.500 DirSynch tools don't look nearly as powerful as XDSU,
but one benefit is that they are packaged with the X.500 product at no
extra cost. PMDF X.500 looks like a good solution for customers
running other PMDF products like the SMTP backbone, and who have less
demanding X.500 requirements. (It's a 1988 Quipu implementation).
I've worked with DSU for some time and it's a great tool for DirSynch.
Having seen the docs for XDSU, it looks like an even more powerful one
than DSU. For larger sites with complex directory synch needs, they
will probably want to invest the extra money and do it right with XDSU.
DEC X.500 Soapbox Alert: Another benefit of PMDF X.500 is that they
offer LDAP access on their X.500 product on VMS, unlike a certain other
company I can name. This issue has caused no end of problems trying to
sell DEC X.500 into VMS shops. People want LDAP and they don't want to
have to maintain multiple operating systems to get it. This means we
usually stand to lose most ALL-IN-1 shops right off the bat. I really
wish we would resolve this problem quickly. Thanks for letting me get
that off my chest.
- Dave
|
967.4 | Agree that LDAP on VMS is needed | MAKREL::COOLEY | Megan and Michelle's Daddy | Sat Feb 08 1997 04:28 | 19 |
| Dave,
Thanks for the nice writeup on Dirsynch - you will have to try XDSU
sometime, though. :-)
Re: LDAP support on OpenVMS
I noticed that libldap.h from a Digital Unix system has a few of the
following:
#ifdef __VMS
Is/was an OpenVMS version available and just not being released for some
reason? Maybe another group could help port/support a VMS ibxd (ldap
server) if X.500 doesn't have the resources. (not to mention ibxlookupd).
It does seem that a directory w/o LDAP support is a loser at this point.
Warren
|
967.5 | Client code for VMS | wookpc.ogo.dec.com::LEE | | Tue Feb 11 1997 17:39 | 5 |
| Remember that DXDLU is an LDAP client, so the VMS specific ifdefs are
probably to support that. I think there is also VMS code for the UMich
LDAP distribution, but I don't know if there is an LDAP server port.
Wook
|