| Title: | MAILBUS 400 User Forum |
| Notice: | kits 100-109 - Infocenter //www.digital.com/info/messaging |
| Moderator: | IOSG::MARSHALL |
| Created: | Thu Jun 11 1992 |
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 3210 |
| Total number of notes: | 9174 |
We have to state rapidly if 2-WAY alternate functionality is
intended to be supported on MailbUS 400
If yes in which release and with which interoprability ?
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3210.1 | Will be there! | ATZIS2::EHRLICH_K | Never met a Lady like her before! | Fri Jun 06 1997 09:40 | 8 |
Hi,
yes, MAILbus 400 V2.1 will include Two Way Alternate (TWA).
For details about the V2.1 release, please contact Geoff Oades (@REO).
Cheers
Charly
| |||||
| 3210.2 | testing req'ts | FORTY2::KNOWLES | Per ardua ad nauseam | Fri Jun 06 1997 09:53 | 9 |
�with which interoprability ?
Hmm. What does this mean? We will interoperate with (the few) other
MTAs that support the X.400 definition of TWA. The developers working
on TWA would be interested in knowing of any specific requirements (and
potential peers with whom we could test TWA). Again, please contact Geoff
Oades or the development manager, Carl Evans (also @REO) with any info.
b
| |||||
| 3210.3 | testing req'ts | FORTY2::KNOWLES | Per ardua ad nauseam | Fri Jun 06 1997 10:00 | 15 |
�with which interoprability ?
Hmm. What does this mean? We should interoperate with (the few) other
MTAs that support the X.400 definition of TWA. That's what standards
are supposed to be about. There may be problems in practice, but the
only way an implementer can avoid these is by advance-warning and
testing.
The developers working on TWA would be interested in knowing of any
specific interworking requirements (and potential peers with whom we
could test TWA). Is there, for example, a big French supplier or group
of suppliers that we need to work with? Again, please contact Geoff
Oades or the development manager, Carl Evans (also @REO) with any info.
b
| |||||
| 3210.4 | IOSG::MARSHALL | Fri Jun 06 1997 10:52 | 7 | ||
re .0 and .1 Note this is still a "future". You should discuss with Geoff Oades what is possible and prudent to tell the customer at this time, before releasing any information about our possible future implementation of TWA. Scott | |||||