| Title: | Digital PostScript printers and their associated software |
| Moderator: | REGENT::LASKO HER |
| Created: | Wed Jan 24 1990 |
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 7230 |
| Total number of notes: | 31971 |
VMS/AXP 6.1
A landscape document generated by WPS-PLUS, when printed on a LN14 printer
produced this error
ERROR: syntaxerror
OFFENDING COMMAND: To provide a prompt and efficient compensation..
STACK
-savelevel-
Note the value given by "OFFENDING COMMAND:" was in fact a text line
on page 3 of a 25-page document
The printer hardware/firmware status report showed
o RAM: 3Mb
o Firmware version:
PostScript/PCL 5 version: 2014.103
Firmware level: 76
o Fonts:
PostScript: 35
PCL: 20
o Other settings:
Resolution: 600 x 600 DPI
Print Enhancement Technology: Medium
and the queue settings were essentially
Terminal queue XXXXXX idle, on XXXXXX::LTA60:, mounted form DEFAULT
(stock=DEFAULT)
......
/DEFAULT=(FEED,FORM=DEFAULT) /PROCESSOR=LATSYM
I obtained the source PS file and printed to an internal LN14 confirued with
DCPS$SMB and it worked fine.
Customer first had print problem inside ALL-IN-1; so a test was done by
obtaining the output to a disk file (i.e. not printing directly to the queue
but producing the disk output file) , then $ PRINT this file from DCL. Same
problem existed.
The involved PS source file can be found as
RIPPER::USER$TSC:[LEH.CORE]Q50092.PS;1 168 blocks (RWED,RWED,RE,RE)
Thanks for any help
Hong
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7201.1 | don't use LATSYM for PostScript printers | REGENT::POWERS | Thu May 15 1997 09:36 | 17 | |
LATSYM is not a reliable PostScript symbiont. My first guess would be that LATSYM is inserting line feeds or form feeds into the file to force its expectations of page formatting. The reported errant line is quite long, over 132 characters (there are four lines in the file longer than 132 characters). This is exactly the kind of boundary LATSYM looks for. However, "syntaxerror" is a rather unusual PostScript error for this situation. Normally it applies to broken constructs like unterminated procedure bodies or quoted strings, so there is a possible connection here. But the bottomn line is that LATSYM is NOT a robust PostScript-capable symbiont. If someone MUST use LATSYM, make it as clean and non-intrusive as possible, removing autowrapping of lines and pages and making sure that no characters get stripped (escape sequences and control characters). - tom] | |||||
| 7201.2 | moving away from LATSYM | GIDDAY::LEH | Thu May 15 1997 21:49 | 10 | |
Tom
Your assessment of the problem is spot on as the customer has been
manually padding spaces to work around the problem.
They're testing DECprint Supervisor, as suggested
Many thanks
Hong
| |||||